Here’s How China Can Crush US Tech Firms If Trade War Escalates

President Trump rattled stocks on Wednesday after the Commerce Department rolled out its list of Chinese products, representing $200 billion in imports, that could soon face 10% tariffs Tuesday night – the latest sign that the escalating trade war between the US and its largest economic rival is still heating up. And, echoing recent comments from Morgan Stanley, on Wednesday morning, Bloomberg pointed out that China could soon opt to “trip up” US tech firms operating in the region, something that MS analysts say could have serious repercussions for US equities which have yet to be adequately priced in by the market, and which earned the tech sector a downgrade to underweight.

Apple

Since China imports far fewer goods from the US than the US imports from China, the country has threatened to embrace other tactics as part of its retaliation, like imposing new taxes or adding regulation on US companies, slowing deal approvals, or encouraging citizens to boycott American products, the WSJ reported today.

Some companies that export goods to China have already reported unexplained holdups at customs or in other areas. And as Bloomberg reported Wednesday, US tech companies – which have led US the US equity market all year as the bulk of the S&P 500’s gains have been on the back of a handful of megacap tech stocks – are particularly vulnerable to the Communist Party’s wrath. Which is one reason why Morgan Stanley recently recommended that its clients stay long volatility into the summer. As Michael Zezas, Chief US Public Policy & Municipal Strategist at Morgan Stanley wrote earlier this month: “In equities, our team thinks that US tech is vulnerable as a sector where pricing has been insensitive to trade risks so far.”  

As a reminder, it is tech stocks that have been the pillar upon which the market’s 2018 gains were erected, with just the 5 biggest stocks responsible for nearly all the S&P’s upside in 2018.

Tech

Out of all US tech companies, Apple is perhaps most vulnerable to China’s retaliation. While President Trump has reportedly promised Apple CEO Tim Cook that iPhones will be spared from the Trump administration’s tariffs it’s likely only a matter of time before Xi Jinping becomes frustrated with Tim Cook’s ineffectual attempts to act as the tech community’s “chief diplomat” and decides to crack down on the world’s largest company. 

Apple is the master of global electronics supply chains. While the company is based in the U.S., China has arguably become its most important market. The vast majority of Apple products manufactured across China, and the company generated about 20 percent of its revenue there during its most-recent fiscal year.

Since launching bigger-screened iPhones in China and striking expansive wireless carrier partnerships with China Mobile and others, Apple has thrived there. The company has increasingly configured some of its hardware and software for the region – at a level beyond any customization for other markets. It also released a gold iPhone to appeal to Chinese consumers, added mobile-payment support for some of the country’s transit systems, and developed messaging features that mimic popular functions of local services like WeChat.

The company has also followed local laws, agreeing to relocate data storage for its iCloud services to state-affiliated servers in China. Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive officer, also visits China regularly for public and private events.

But while the crackdown on Apple remains one eventuality, the Chinese government has a more direct route: hitting M&A deals, like scuttling Qualcomm’s planned takeover of NXP. The US chipmaker has little more than a week left to close the deal before its agreement with NXP expires.

That chip deal is one of the most prominent hostages of the brewing trade war between the U.S. and China. Qualcomm promised investors that the transaction would be closed by the end of 2017. NXP has given Qualcomm until July 25 to close the deal or their agreement will expire.

Qualcomm already won clearance through the investigation phase of China’s approval process, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg earlier this year. The final announcement, though, may be held up amid the high-level standoff over broader trade issues and the fate of Chinese telecom equipment company ZTE Corp.

The complexity of politically infused, cross-border acquisition approvals is relatively minor compared to the global electronics supply chain, which binds China and the U.S. and creates domestic tensions for both countries. An Intel Corp. processor made in Oregon or Arizona will often head to Chengdu where it’s packaged for final installation into a computer. That computer can then be assembled for a U.S. company such as HP Inc. by a Chinese subcontractor and shipped to the U.S. for sale. It’s unclear which parts of this process would be affected by U.S.-China tariffs.

And here is why semis are especially vulnerable: chipmakers and other tech companies derive a larger percentage of their sales from China than any other US industry.

Tech

 

According to Deutsche Bank calculations, US-based companies have a trade surplus of $20 billion with China if US corporate revenues are factored in. Given this vulnerability, and with the US showing no signs of backing down, the question of whether Xi and the Communist Party will go after US tech giants that they once sought to court is no longer a question of “if”, but a question of “when.”

And if a true tech selloff gets rolling – one that even corporations couldn’t stop by stepping in and buying back their stocks…

Buyback

… it’s impossible to say where it will stop.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NLzPev Tyler Durden

Alt-Left Melts Down Over “Unmasking Antifa” Act

It seems the new “Unmasking Antifa Act” has ruffled a few feathers among the alt-left.

Introduced in the House last month by Rep Dan Donovan (R-NY), H.R. 6054 is a response to a spate of violent attacks provoked by masked members of Antifa, and would punish anyone wearing a mask who “injures, oppresses, threatens or intimidates” a person “in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege” with a fine and up to 15 years in prison.

The law is effectively a modern take on anti-mask laws dating back to the mid-20th century in order to stop the violent activities of the Ku Klux Klan – and the left is predictably pissed.

New York City anarchist Carmichael Monaco of the Metropolitan Anarchist Coordinating Council told Vice on Tuesday: 

“H.R. 6054 takes a pro-fascist stance in its very name, and doubtlessly in its enforcement. In the current political climate, antifascists who speak out against fascism, racism, xenophobia, etc. are routinely harassed, threatened, and attacked by the far right, often supported by the police, who are notably exempted here. Families and friends of antifascists also become targets of far right violence. The wearing of a mask is an act of self-defense often necessary to ensure one’s right to free speech.” 

Alt-left Twitter denizens were none too pleased either: 

(his pinned tweet) 

Of course, some on the alt-left are way ahead of the Unmask Antifa Act..

That doesn’t exactly obscure one’s identity while “punching a Nazi” – while footage of a Proud Boy knocking out a preppy kid in a polo shirt would instantly go viral. We can only imagine.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2LbBbOa Tyler Durden

Meet The Navy’s Newest Autonomous Helicopter Aboard A Stealth Combat Ship

U.S. Navy Public Affairs of the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron 1 reported that an autonomous helicopter has completed the first comprehensive Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E). Results from the IOT&E will inform naval officials on how to integrate the Navy’s brand-new autonomous helicopter with the littoral combat ships (LCS) and other platforms.

According to the report by Lt.j.g. Caroline Zotti, the Northrop Grumman MQ-8C Fire Scout, a crewless helicopter developed for reconnaissance, situational awareness, aerial fire support and precision targeting support, performed a series of mission-oriented scenarios aboard the USS Coronado (LCS 4), an Independence-class stealth littoral combat ship, last month.

Aviation Machinist’s Mate 2nd Class Salvatore Green, left, and Aviation Electronics Technician 3rd Class Jake Price, prepare the MC-8C Fire Scout to launch from USS Coronado (LCS 4), June 21. (Source: U.S. Navy/Ensign Jalen Robinson)

During the IOT&E, the MQ-8C Fire Scout program demonstrated cohesion between the USS Coronado in several mission scenarios off the coast of Southern California. It provided LCS with extended over-the-horizon intelligence-gathering capabilities.

“The results, lessons learned, and recommendations reported on following this underway test period are absolutely invaluable to the future of the MQ-8C Fire Scout’s mission effectiveness and suitability to perform that mission,” said Lt. Cmdr. Seth Ervin, the lead for the VX-1 detachment aboard Coronado.

The VX-1, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron One, conducted simulated engagements to evaluate Fire Scout’s enemy target identification system, intelligence gathering capabilities, and surface warfare operations. The test focused on combining both MQ-8C Fire Scout and the Sikorsky MH-60 Seahawk for joint operations.

“It has been challenging and rewarding to be one of the first maintainers afforded the opportunity to take both aircraft aboard the ship. Working together, we made the overall product more functional and efficient for the fleet,” said Aviation Machinist’s Mate 2nd Class Salvatore Greene, a member of VX-1.

The report indicated the Fire Scout could see “technological and tactical improvements” ahead of a much broader deployment aboard LCS vessels.

“My crew is excited to build upon their past experiences operating with Fire Scout and continue to improve our proficiency as a war-fighting team,” said Cmdr. Lawrence Repass, the commanding officer of Coronado.

The MQ-8C airframe is based on the Bell 407, while avionics, electrical systems, and sensors were integrated into the aircraft — originally developed for the MQ-8B Fire Scout. The helicopter first flew in October 2013 and had since completed four years of testing.

The first ship-based flight of the MQ-8C Fire Scout occurred aboard USS Jason Dunham (DDG 109), an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, in December 2014. Video: MQ-8C Fire Scout Takes First Flight on USS Jason Dunham:

While sailors are excited about this new autonomous technology, this could be problematic for helicopter pilots who not too long ago, were flying these machines. The next phase of automation and advances in robotics will create dramatic shifts in the transportation wing of the military.

*  *  *

Karen Harris, Managing Director of Bain & Company’s Macro Trends Group, describes the coming shift of automation impact on employment from 2015 to 2030:

“The next phase of automation, based on machine learning, artificial intelligence and advances in robotics, will affect 80% of workers through wage suppression and job loss. If automation rolls out slowly, workers who lose their jobs will have more time to adjust, retrain or retire out of the workforce. Given the quickening pace of technological adoption over the past half century, however, rapid adoption is more likely.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2L9RDhK Tyler Durden

Seven Takeaways From The US Tariff Escalation

By Steven Englander, head of Global G10 FX at Standard Chartered

  • We were surprised that the escalation occurred so rapidly but not that the US decided to press its advantage (see Questioning Friday’s market optimism).  

  • The US announcement was likely partly triggered by the desire to maintain momentum going into mid-term elections. Hearings on the tariffs will likely be held in late August, the final list announced in early September, with implementation even later. Any price impact would probably not appear before the elections, allowing time for negotiation.

  • Moreover, the inflation impact is not large. In addition, the CNY has depreciated by almost 7% from its recent highs – this is probably enough to offset the price impact of the announced tariffs.

  • China seems surprised by the speed of the follow-up. Allowing the market to weaken the CNY overnight may be the path of least resistance.

  • Investors anticipate a major reaction from China. If China stops at tariffs on goods (keeping in mind that the US exports about USD 130bn annually to China, less than the USD 200bn of goods that the US will tariff) there will likely be a relief rally. The negative market reaction will probably be stronger, if China responds with heavy non-tariff measures to match the impact of the US measures.

  • The market reaction outside of Asia is more muted than earlier responses to tariff announcement, because: (1) it seems clear that this will be a longer process, (2) export substitution outside of China may occur, and (3) the US domestic economy seems on solid footing. It is possible and even likely that more issues will emerge with Canada over autos and with other regions. We do not interpret the limited non-Asia reaction as a signal that further escalation will be innocuous.

  • Within G10 FX, commodity currencies appear to be most vulnerable. The EUR has held up reasonably well – the euro area is not as exposed as Canada to escalation of trade tensions. In the short term the Bank of Canada’s framing of trade risk will likely drive the CAD.

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NHWOap Tyler Durden

In Unprecedented Move, Rosenstein Asks 100s Of Prosecutors To Review SCOTUS Pick’s Records

In a somewhat unprecedented move, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein has asked the offices of all 93 U.S. attorneys to each provide up to three federal prosecutors to assist the Justice Department in reviewing government records of President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Even The New York Times admits this move is “an unusual insertion of politics into federal law enforcement.

While the Justice Department has helped work on previous Supreme Court nominations, department lawyers in Washington typically carry out that task, not prosecutors who pursue criminal investigations nationwide.

Mr. Rosenstein’s email, which had the subject line “Personal Message to U.S. Attorneys From the Deputy A.G.,” included the sentence, “We need your help in connection with President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the Supreme Court.”

Former law enforcement officials told the Times that Rosenstein’s request is troubling.

It’s flat-out wrong to have career federal prosecutors engaged in a political process like the vetting of a Supreme Court nominee. It takes them away from the mission they’re supposed to be fulfilling, which is effective criminal justice enforcement,” Christopher Hunter, a former F.B.I. agent and federal prosecutor for almost 11 years, told the publication.

But Michael Zubrensky, a former Justice Department lawyer who oversaw the agency’s Office of Legal Policy, said Kavanaugh’s long paper trail could be the reason for Rosenstein’s request.

Sarah Isgur Flores, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, told the Times that prosecutors have been used in the past to vet Supreme Court nominees. “[T]he scope of the production of executive branch documents we’ve been asked for is many, many times as large,” she said.

Rosenstein also wrote that he would need the equivalent of 100 full-time attorneys to work on the nominee’s confirmation hearing.

As The Hill notes, Kavanaugh previously worked for President George W. Bush’s administration, as well as for the investigation led by Kenneth Starr of former President Clinton. He left a lengthy paper trail that Democrats and outside groups opposed to his nomination are likely to search through for arguments against his confirmation.

Rosenstein has faced pressure from congressional Republicans over his role in overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. Democrats have raised the Mueller probe in the context of Kavanaugh’s nomination, arguing that he should not be confirmed because he could end up making decisions on the probe itself.

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NIvAQQ Tyler Durden

Why WNBA Players Are Over (Not Under) Paid

Authored by Tho Bishop via The Mises Institute,

It is a credit to the economics profession that the labor theory of value has largely fallen out of style. There is, however, one sector of the economy in which it continues to be taken seriously: sports.

The latest example of this economic fallacy emerged when A’ja Wilson of the WNBA’s Las Vegas Aces took to Twitter to poke LeBron James’s new contract with the Los Angeles Lakers.

“154M. must.be. nice,” wrote Wilson.

“We over here looking for a [million] but Lord, let me get back in my lane.”

When she received push back on comparing her value to one of the greatest players of all time, she responded

“Ohh, it’s about skill set? [B]ecause I heard a bench player gets paid more than … nvm.”

In her defense, Wilson is a 21-year-old athlete who probably hasn’t thought a great deal about economics. It’s understandable for someone in her position to be envious of the paychecks earned in major professional sports leagues. Unfortunately Wilson’s thoughts reflect a growing trend of sports commentary looking at the plight of the “underpaid” WNBA player. Lisa Borders, president of the WNBA, has even directly pointed to sexism as a driving reason for the discrepancies between the earnings of male and female players.

Of course, the real issue has nothing to do with sexism and everything to do with the fact that the WNBA simply isn’t very popular with Americans. 

For example, last month the WNBA averaged 250,000 viewers per game with a high of 378,000. Relative to the history of the league, this was an extraordinary success, up 39% from last year. By comparison, last year’s Professional Bowling League averaged 650,000 viewers for ESPN. So even relative to other non-major professional leagues, the WNBA struggles for relevance. 

Is it possible, however, that this simply shows an inherent sexist bias by consumers against women’s basketball?

Unfortunately the “blame the patriarchy” narrative doesn’t hold up when you compare the WNBA to the college game. This year’s Women’s NCAA Championship managed 3.5 million viewers on ESPN this year — down 9% from 2017. Meanwhile last year’s WNBA championship series averaged 487,000 viewers, with a high of 597,000 for Game 1. These numbers were promoted by the league as the highest since 2003.

Of course, TV ratings themselves are less important to this topic than dollars attached to their television contracts, and to the WNBA’s credit ESPN doubled the value of their contract with the league to $25 million a year in 2016. This has led David Berri of Forbes to argue that because WNBA salaries make up less than a quarter of league revenue, as opposed to the NBA’s 50% split, the WNBA is clearly exploiting their players. Undermining Berri’s position is the simple observation that revenue is not the same as profit — another measure by which the WNBA has consistently struggled. As the New York Times reported in 2016, only half of WNBA teams have managed to become profitable 20 years after the league’s founding.

A case can actually be made that WNBA players are actually overpaid relative to what consumers actually want. After all, the WNBA is subsidized by the NBA in a variety of ways including direct financial support, free publicity, and the fact that many WNBA franchises are owned by the city’s NBA owner. In fact, the WNBA’s big television contract was itself a byproduct of the channel reworking its agreement with their male counterpart.2 So instead of grumbling about the salaries male basketball players enjoy, perhaps A’ja Wilson should be thankful that the men’s product helps bolster her own paycheck. 

At the end of the day, just about any article focusing on how athletes are either under- (or over-) paid stems from the fallacious view that their compensation is an inherent product of their labor, rather than the subjective values of consumers. 

The financial success of professional athletes has almost nothing to do with their talent and everything to do with the entertainment the public receives from it. LeBron James is one of the greatest athletes in human history, but if his sport of choice generated the public interest the WNBA has, he would not be signing a $154 million dollar contract. This also helps explains why e-sports players are making more money than the best in the WNBA. No pain can still result in financial gain.

Of course consumer preferences can change. Perhaps the American public will come to appreciate the strong fundamentals of the WNBA and, as a result, salaries will improve. Until then, women basketball players should perhaps look for markets that place greater value on their skill. Like Russia.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2KRI7Us Tyler Durden

US-China Trade Negotiations Have Collapsed

High-level trade negotiations between Beijing and Washington have “ground to a halt” following Trump’s dramatic escalation proposing an additional $200 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods, Bloomberg reports.

After three rounds of formal negotiations led by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, communications between senior members of the Trump and Xi administrations have collapsed – with no immediate plans to restart formal talks.

The diplomatic impasse makes it unlikely the two countries will stand down anytime soon from an intensifying trade war that is roiling financial markets and threatening the broadest global upswing in years. The Trump administration on Tuesday released a proposed list of an additional $200 billion in Chinese goods to be hit with tariffs. China’s Commerce Ministry said the tariffs, which cover everything from refrigerators to handbags, are “totally unacceptable.”Bloomberg

And while the two countries have continued to engage in informal dialogue among lower-level bureaucrats, Washington and Beijing have around seven weeks to strike a deal or risk a trade war that would be incredibly disruptive to corporate supply chains – stoking fears over increased prices for consumers.

“It’s extremely important that when two governments get into this kind of situation with each other that even if they are fighting on the official front, that they have something going on in the background that enables them at some point to declare a sort of ceasefire,” National Foreign Trade Council president Rufus Yerxa in a Bloomberg TV interview on Wednesday. “For the time being the two sides aren’t going to acknowledge that. They’re positioning themselves for the end game.”

Despite the flare-up in tensions amid the $200 billion tariff proposal, President Trump has continued to emphasize his personal friendship with President Xi Jinping – while the Trump administration has been signaling that they would like to re-engage China at the “top level,” according to Bloomberg

That said, frustration continues to mount. 

there are growing signs of frustration on both sides. On a conference call with reporters Tuesday, senior Trump administration officials argued that China started the conflict with unfair trading practices and abuse of U.S. intellectual property. One of the officials said the U.S. has repeatedly made its concerns clear and continues to hope for a negotiated solution, but Beijing hasn’t changed its behavior. –Bloomberg

Mixed signals

Ongoing tensions between Steve Mnuchin and Wilbur Ross have complicated matters and resulted in mixed messages, according to Bloomberg‘s sources. 

As the de facto spokesman on economic matters within the cabinet, Mnuchin took the lead early in the negotiations. But at different points in the talks, other more hawkish members of the administration have taken the helm, such Ross, which has confused the Chinese. –Bloomberg

President Trump is also said to have grown frustrated with China’s reluctance to come to the table with more concessions – particularly after the United States reversed a decision to impose harsh restrictions on Chinese telecom-equipment manufacturer ZTE Corp., according to a White House official who did not want to be identified. 

Trump also doesn’t think China has been very helpful with regards to encouraging North Korea to abandon their nuclear weapons program. 

“We agreed to the denuclearization of North Korea,” Trump tweeted on Monday. “China, on the other hand, may be exerting negative pressure on a deal because of our posture on Chinese Trade-Hope Not!”

Meanwhile, Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has a “great deal of concern” about the friction with China – and in particular, the uncertainty it’s creating among Iowa farmers and businesses. Soy futures, a target long expected for China’s retaliation, have fallen around 16% since the end of May making life for US farmers especially painful.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2mcINVM Tyler Durden

Trump Doubles Down: Threatens Sanctions On European Investors In Russian Pipeline

With less than a week to go before President Trump is scheduled to meet with President Putin in Helsinki, the State Department has decided to renew its pressure campaign on Western businesses invested in Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline to Germany.

Nord

According to Reuters, the State Department has doubled down on previous warnings to Europe, most recently in May when Trump gave Merkel an ultimatum to drop the Russian gas pipeline, and has been “making it clear” to firms involved with “the Russian energy export pipeline sector” that they’re at risk of being sanctioned.

“We have been clear that firms working in the Russian energy export pipeline sector are engaging in a line of business that carries sanctions risk,” a spokesman for the U.S. State Department told Reuters.

“We believe it (the pipeline) would undermine Europe’s overall energy security and stability by providing Russia another tool for the political coercion of European countries, especially Ukraine. Russia understands that this project is dividing Europe, and is using that to its advantage.”

The warning comes after President Trump accused Germany of being a “captive of Russia” because of its dependence on the pipeline for LNG, unleashing a diplomatic scandal ahead of his official NATO visit.

Russia

Five prominent Western firms have invested in the pipeline – Wintershall and Uniper, in Germany, OMV in Austria, Anglo-Dutch Shell (a British-Dutch multinational) and Engie of France.

Should the State Department follow through with its threat, the EU has threatened swift retaliation (given that Germany isn’t the only European country that’s energy-dependent on Russia). That’s also why the EU has warned against moves in the US Congress to escalate sanctions with Russia (though the US media would have you believe that Trump is the true source of resistance). The point that Trump made earlier about the pipeline undermining NATO is actually the official position of the State Department. It also happens to be correct. Germany and much of Europe are effectively held hostage by Russian energy exports. While the US media reports that Trump himself is undermining NATO by meeting with Putin, there are probably more than a few EU energy ministers who were relieved at the prospect of their meeting.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2NI77ex Tyler Durden

Lawyer: Monsanto Bullied Scientists And Hid Weedkiller’s Cancer Risks

Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,

A lawyer on Monday argued that Roundup creator Monsanto hid the cancer-causing effects of their weedkiller and bullied scientists into making claims it was safe. In a landmark lawsuit against the global chemical corporation, the lawyer didn’t hold back in his accusations against Monsanto.

“Monsanto has specifically gone out of its way to bully … and to fight independent researchers,” said the attorney Brent Wisner, who presented internal Monsanto emails that he said showed how the agrochemical company rejected critical research and expert warnings over the years while pursuing and helping to write favorable analyses of their products. “They fought science,” added Wisner, who is representing Dwayne Johnson.  Johnson alleges Monsanto is to blame for the cancer that has been aggressively spreading throughout his entire body.

According to The Guardian, Johnson (also known as Lee) is a father of three and a former school groundskeeper, who doctors say may have just mere months to live. He is the first person to take Monsanto to trial over allegations that the chemical sold under the Roundup brand is linked to cancer although thousands have made similar legal claims across the United States.  This lawsuit focuses on the chemical glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, which Monsanto began marketing as Roundup in 1974.  The company began by presenting it as a “technological breakthrough” that could kill almost every weed without harming humans or the environment.

Monsanto lawyer George Lombardi alleged that the body of research over the past decades was on the company’s side.

“The scientific evidence is overwhelming that glyphosate-based products do not cause cancer and did not cause Mr. Johnson’s cancer,” Lombardi claimed in his opening statements.

Unfortunately for Lombardi, many studies have shown his statements as fallacious. There is a mountain of scientific data working against Monsanto, including a 2015 declaration by the World Health Organization’s international agency for research on cancer (IARC), which classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”  Carcinogenic means “potentially cancer-causing.”

Johnson worked as a groundskeeper for the school district in Benicia, just north of San Francisco, in California. He was responsible for applying the weedkiller Roundup, Monsanto’s glyphosate product to the grounds.   According to The Guardian, lawyers for Johnson showed the jury photos of lesions and rashes on Johnson’s skin after he was regularly exposed to the chemical. Johnson was eventually diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in 2014, at age of 42. “The simple fact is he’s going to die. It’s just a matter of time,” Wisner said in court. “Between now and then, it’s just nothing but pain.”

A strategic corporate document also revealed Monsanto’s public relations plan to “orchestrate outcry” in advance of the IARC glyphosate classification, Wisner told the jury.

Wisner further cited Monsanto emails from decades prior, in which the company was working with a genotoxicity expert who reviewed a series of 1990s studies. He raised concerns about Roundup impacts on humans and suggested further areas of research. After the expert’s analyses, Monsanto representatives began considering finding a different expert and also started working on a press statement saying the product carried no risk, according to Johnson’s lawyer.

Wisner also read documents that he said showed how Monsanto strategized plans to “ghostwrite” favorable research. –The Guardian

The lawyer for Monsanto disputes the claims saying Wisner is “cherrypicking” studies in favor of his client. Regardless of the outcome, however, Wisner said, “so much of what Monsanto has worked to keep secret is coming out.” Hopefully, the public will soon know just how dangerous glyphosate can be so people can be effectively warned before using it.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2L1u6CR Tyler Durden

Dancing FBI Agent Who Shot A Bystander Will Get His Gun Back, Judge Rules

Considering the range of fireable offenses for most any job, shooting someone while on or off the job would easily and obviously rank high up as something warranting immediate termination with no questions asked. 

Apparently this is not the case with federal government employees, however, and specifically the FBI. 

Last month we featured the viral video of FBI agent Chase Bishop accidentally shooting a bystander at a Colorado bar while busting a move that included a backflip in the middle of a boozed up crowd. During the bizarre dance move, the agent’s gun ejected out of his holster onto the floor and as he lunged to pick it up, the gun went off, seriously wounding nearby bar patron Tom Reddington, who was treated and eventually released from a hospital.

FBI agent Chase Bishop, who lives and works in Washington D.C., will get his gun back while awaiting his court hearing. 

Common sense might dictate this is a man who shouldn’t be carrying a gun while awaiting his court hearing after he was charged with one count of second-degree assault in connection with the June 2 shooting. 

But a Denver judge has ruled he can now carry his weapon again on or off duty as Bishop considers a possible plea deal and future court date of August 21st. 

According to the Denver Post:

Chase Bishop, 29, had his protection order amended by a Denver judge during a Tuesday court appearance, said Ken Lane, Denver District Attorney spokesman.

The amendment was modified to let Bishop carry his service weapon on and off duty, “so long as it is done in a manner pursuant to FBI policy,”Lane said.

Naturally, we might ask: what would it take for an FBI agent under criminal investigation to be barred from carrying a firearm? 

The Denver Post notes further that “The FBI also has not released any information about its policy for agents carrying weapons while off duty and in alcohol establishments.”

What’s more is that FBI policy was actually invoked favorably to help convince the judge that the agent should arm himself, as the New York Post reports:

Bishop’s lawyer, David Goddard, told Judge Fran Simonet that the FBI strongly encourages its agents to carry the service weapons when they are not working. Prosecutors did not object, so Simonet said Bishop could be armed both on and off duty.

The victim, Tom Reddington, who was reportedly shot through an arterytold ABC News last month that he does not blame Bishop, saying “I’m not vindictive at all. I don’t want to ruin his life. At this point, there’s nothing we can do to fix it. So, let’s just move on and deal with it as best we can.”

Aftermath of the accidental shooting at the Denver bar Mile High Spirits. Image source: CBS

Well at the very least the FBI or the court could take away his gun. Police investigated whether or not Bishop was drunk at the time, but a blood alcohol test was never made public and investigators decided to file the second-degree assault charge without the test results.

The Denver, Colorado bar where the incident took place, Mile High Spirits, previously issued a statement saying the bar’s owners looked forward to speaking with the FBI “so we can come to understand (the agent’s) presence and his need to be armed in our establishment,” in violation of the business’ rules.

The bar also announced the shooting victim will be “welcome at Mile High Spirits to enjoy complimentary drinks forever.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2zvGvdJ Tyler Durden