Leaking Las Vegas: West’s Biggest Reservoir Nears Critical Threshold

Lake Mead – the West’s largest reservoir – is running dry again and is on track to fall below a critical threshold in 2020, according to a new forecast by the Bureau of Reclamation.

In 2016, Lake Mead water levels drop to new record lows (since it was filled in the 1930s) leaving Las Vegas facing existential threats unless something is done. Las Vegas and its 2 million residents and 40 million tourists a year get almost all their drinking water from the Lake and at levels below 1075ft, the Interior Department will be forced to declare a “shortage,” which will lead to significant cutbacks for Arizona and Nevada.

And now, two years later, the situation appears to be getting worse as The Wall Street Journal reports, in a prediction released Wednesday, the Bureau of Reclamation, a multistate agency that manages water and power in the West, said there is a 52% probability that water levels will fall below a threshold of 1,075 feet elevation by 2020.

Source

“The very big concern is the perception that water supplies are uncertain,” said Todd Reeve, chief executive officer of Business for Water Stewardship, a nonprofit group in Portland, Ore., that works with businesses on water use nationally.

“So if a water shortage is declared, that would be a huge shot across the bow that, wow, water supplies could be uncertain.”

The Colorado River, which supplies water to 40 million people from Denver to Los Angeles, has been in long-term decline amid what bureau officials call the driest 19-year period in recorded history.

Lake Mead, which serves as the biggest reservoir of the river’s water, resumed its decline this year after the region returned to drought conditions. As of Wednesday, it stood at 1,078 feet, about 150 feet below its peak.

If Lake Mead’s water levels fall below the 1,075 feet threshold, it could trigger the first ever federal shortage declaration on the Colorado River – which experts say could undermine the Southwest’s economy.

Farmers in Arizona – which would be among the first states hit with cutbacks – are taking precautionary measures. Officials of the Maricopa Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District, which could lose about half its Colorado River water if a shortage were declared, say they are working on alternatives such as digging more wells. The district, with 60,000 acres under cultivation between Phoenix and Tucson, might see as much as 15% of its planted fields left fallow under a shortage, said General Manager Brian Betcher.

“We’re not sure how much acreage will go out,” he said, “but we know there will be a hit.”

As one water research scientist warned, “this problem is not going away and it is likely to get worse, perhaps far worse, as climate change unfolds.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2nNJQfi Tyler Durden

Massachusetts Cop Pleads Guilty to Pocketing $11,000 for Hours He Didn’t Work

|||Bob DeChiara/USA Today Sports/NewscomA Massachusetts state trooper is pleading guilty to pocketing $11,000 in overtime pay for hours that he didn’t actually work.

NBC Boston reports that Kevin Sweeney, 40, of the Massachusetts State Police (MSP) found a way to game the system in order to receive extra money for shifts that he either left early or did not work at all. As United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling told WCVB, “Sweeney concealed his fraud by submitting fraudulent citations designed to create the appearance that he had worked overtime hours that he had not, and falsely claimed in MSP paperwork and payroll entries that he had worked the entirety of his overtime shifts.”

Of the $249,407 Sweeny received in 2015, overtime pay accounted for $111,808 of it. Of the $218,512 he earned in 2016, overtime pay made up $95,895.

Sweeney entered a guilty plea to one count of embezzlement from an agency receiving federal funds and to one count of wire fraud. According to MassLive, he is the sixth Massachusetts state trooper to be charged with such crimes and the second to plead guilty. The others charged include Lieutenant David Wilson, 57, Trooper Gary Herman, 45, former Trooper Paul Cesan, 50, retired Trooper Daren DeJong, 56, and Trooper Gregory Raftery, 47 (Raftery entered a guilty plea). All of the troopers were charged with the same crimes as Sweeney.

“Today’s announced plea agreement is a direct result of the department’s work to restore transparency and ensure accountability,” MSP wrote in a statement. “Under the leadership of Colonel Gilpin, the State Police will continue to audit earnings from discretionary overtime and, as we did in the case resolved today, provide results to federal and state prosecutors.”

A state police audit led to the discovery of the misconduct, reports Boston 25 News. The activities of over 40 MSP members are now under scrutiny.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2MWyH7d
via IFTTT

To Survive The Midterms With Your Mental Health Intact, Turn Off The “News” & Social Media Now

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

If you want to preserve your sanity and avoid unhappy derangement, turn off all corporate and social media from now to Thanksgiving.

Since elections are extremely profitable for traditional media / social media corporations, your sanity will gleefully be sacrificed in the upcoming election–if you are gullible enough to watch the “news” and tune into social media.Elections are extremely profitable because candidates spend scads of cash on media adverts.

The greater the discord and derangement, the higher the media profits. The more outraged you let yourself become, the more time you spend online, generating insane profits for the corporations that own whatever platforms you’re addicted to.

Seeking an echo chamber of people who agree with you? We got you covered. Attracted like a junkie to emotionally corrosive “news”? That’s our specialty! Want an outlet for your spleen? That’s what we offer, because “we connect people” (haha).

In other words, if you have a self-destructive attraction to anger, helplessness, frustration, bitter unhappiness and derangement–then by all means, watch the “news” and soak up social media. But while you’re destroying your mental health for zero positive gains, please recall that six corporations plus Amazon zillionaire Jeff Bezos own the vast majority of the mainstream media–a truly frightening concentration of power in the hands of a few whose sole purpose is to maximize profit.

This concentration of media control creates the illusion of choice— the same elite-propaganda spin is everywhere you look; our “choice” of “approved” (i.e. corporate) media is roughly the same as that offered the Soviet citizenry in the old USSR.

Given the Corporate Media spews the same tired, Soviet-style narrative with increasing desperation, it’s no wonder than public trust in the mainstream media is plummeting to all-time lows. The “news” isn’t just “fake”: it’s designed to push narratives that benefit self-serving elites at the expense of non-elites.

Given the extreme profitability of divisiveness, it’s also no wonder that political polarization is reaching extremes:

Here’s a reality that you’ll never see in the corporate media, because it’s off message:

As entrenched interests compete to protect their profitable skims, scams, monopolies and fiefdoms, the bottom 95% are slipping into darkness. “The lifestyle you ordered” is not just currently out of stock–it’s no longer being produced.

Propaganda doesn’t have to change your mind to be effective– all it has to do is disable your critical thinking by blinding you with rage, misdirecting your attention, generating an “Other” that acts as a target for projected frustration, creating either-or thinking, splinter the working / middle classes into divisive “tribes” supported by echo-chamber social media and addict you to constant drips of carefully tailored emotional derangement.

Welcome to the corporate / social media’s gulag of the mind: We’ll tell you what’s “true” and what is correct to think and believe. Any deviation from the party line is a threat and must be discredited, marginalized or suppressed.

The greater your mental anguish and derangement, the more profit you generate for the corporate / social media, because the more time you spend “engaging” media and social media, the more money they make.

Nobody in the corporate / social media cares about your mental health–that’s not what they’re paid to care about. They’re paid to sacrifice your mental health to increase their corporate profits. That’s the election in a (heretical) nutshell.

If you want to preserve your sanity and avoid unhappy derangement, turn off all corporate and social media from now to Thanksgiving, and other than watching sports or nature programs, it’s best to leave the corporate / social media off until Christmas–Christmas 2020.

*  *  *

My new book Money and Work Unchained is now $6.95 for the Kindle ebook and $15 for the print edition. Read the first section for free in PDF format. If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wdzwRB Tyler Durden

S&P Downgrades Turkey To B+, Forecasts “Recession” And “Hard Landing”

Just hours after Fitch fired off the latest rating agency warning shot against Turkey, warning that the actions Erdogan has undertaken so far are “insufficient to restore policy credibility”, traders were keenly looking at the scheduled update of S&P’s BB- rating of Turkey, which with an “outlook negative” would most likely be a downgrade.

Sure enough, moments ago Standard and Poors announced that it had cut Turkey by one notch, from BB to B+, citing its expectation “that the extreme volatility of the Turkish lira and the resulting projected sharp balance of payments  adjustment will undermine Turkey’s economy.”

It gets worse, as S&P admits that it “forecasts a recession next year. Inflation will peak at 22% over the next four months, before subsiding to below 20% by mid-2019.” Furthermore, the rating agency anticipates that “2019 will be the first year since 2009 in which nominal credit growth will be less than inflation, implying a major shift in real domestic financing conditions.”

As expected, at the basis of the decision is the collapse in the lira:

The weakening of the lira is putting pressure on the indebted corporate sector and has considerably increased the funding risk for Turkey’s banks. We expect these economic and financial shifts will have implications for public finances, resulting in a rise in the government’s still-moderate debt ratio, and increasing the risk of contingent liabilities rising in the banking sector. Despite heightened economic risks, we believe the policy response from Turkey’s monetary and fiscal authorities has so far been limited.

S&P explains its rationale as follows:

Institutional and Economic Profile: The economy is set to contract in the aftermath of the recent extreme lira volatility

  • Turkey has experienced extreme currency volatility with limited policy response so far.
  • We now expect the economy will contract by 0.5% in real terms in 2019, underpinned by declining consumption and falling investment. Our forecast assumes, however, that banks are still able to successfully refinance existing foreign debt stock over the next three years.
  • Turkey’s institutional environment remains weak, with limited checks and balances in place. Decision-making is centered around President Erdogan following the transition to an executive presidential system in June 2018.

Over the last two weeks, Turkey has experienced substantial local-currency volatility, following a long period of accumulating  macroeconomic imbalances and overheating. Since the beginning of the year, the lira has dropped 38% against the U.S. dollar, of which almost half has taken place in the last two weeks. Meanwhile, inflation reached nearly 16% year-on-year in July.

We forecast an economic recession as a result of exchange rate depreciation and volatility, as well as a likely reduction in foreign financing inflows in the months ahead. According to official estimates, Turkey’s economy grew by 7.4% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2018. However, in recent months signs of a slowdown in domestic demand have become increasingly evident. Combined with the expected sharp balance-of-payments adjustment, we foresee a hard landing for the Turkish economy.

Elevated inflation brought about by the pass-through from exchange-rate depreciation will erode real incomes, depressing private consumption. We expect consumption growth will decelerate to 3.4% this year before posting a 1.7% decline in 2019. This compares to an average annual growth rate of over 5% over the last five years.

More significantly, we expect investments–a traditional driver of the Turkish economy–will shrink by 6% in real terms in 2019. Although the potential for fiscal policy to support public investments remains unclear, several factors combine to foretell a particularly weak outlook for Turkey’s private

The economic outlook is pretty ugly:

Overall, we expect the Turkish economy will experience a hard landing with real GDP contracting by 0.5% in 2019 before rebounding gradually. This is a milder adjustment compared to past financial crises in Turkey–output contracted by 6.0% in 2001 and 4.7% in 2009. Although our forecast remains uncertain, we believe that in contrast to 2009 external demand will hold up relatively well for Turkey’s newly competitive merchandise and services exports, which should provide support.

In a new twist, S&P also covered Turkey’s ongoing diplomatic spat with the US…

There are also substantial risks stemming from Turkey’s international relations. Turkey’s relations with the U.S. have continued to deteriorate throughout 2018, culminating in the introduction of sanctions against two Turkish government ministers at the beginning of August. We understand that risks of further sanctions remain: points of contention include Turkey’s continued detention of a U.S. citizen; its alleged role in allowing Iranian counterparties to evade American sanctions; and its purchase of S-400 surface-to-air missiles from Russia. In early August, U.S. President Donald Trump announced tariffs on aluminium and steel exports from Turkey to the U.S., while Turkey retaliated by hiking tariffs on a range of American consumer goods.

… and regional security:

Regional security also remains precarious. Apart from geopolitical repercussions, any deterioration could substantially impact tourism flows. This could be the case, for example, if tensions in Syria escalated or there was an increased domestic terrorist threat.

As for capital controls…

Although still not our base case, we consider that the likelihood of the introduction of capital controls in Turkey has increased. Consequently, we have revised our transfer & convertibility assessment–which measures the likelihood of a sovereign introducing restrictions on FX access for nonsovereign issuers’ debt service–downward to ‘BB-‘ from ‘BB+’. That said, the Minister of Finance has so far publicly ruled out this option.

Finally, the outlook:

We could lower our ratings on Turkey if we see an increasing likelihood of a systemic banking crisis with the potential to undermine the country’s fiscal position. Key indicators of this could include a rise in corporate loan book default rates, difficulties rolling over banks’ foreign funding, or domestic deposit withdrawals. We could also lower the ratings if Turkey’s economic growth turned out to be materially weaker than we currently project, with a deeper recession taking place over the four-year forecast horizon.

We could consider an upgrade if the government successfully devises and implements a credible economic adjustment program that bolsters confidence, stabilizes balance-of-payments flows, and brings inflation under control.

Full report here (link)

via RSS https://ift.tt/2BmDcXk Tyler Durden

Global Stocks Slump, US Stocks Jump Despite Economic Data Dump

After a week like that, this seemed appropriate…

Before we get started, let’s note that all is not well in the world (despite the constant happy-talk on ‘Murican media)… Global stocks are down 14% from their all-time-high in January…

 

31-month lows for SHCOMP as Chinese stocks had another ugly week… (3rd biggest weekly drop since Jan 2016)

 

“The Chinese stock market does not reflect the speed of the Chinese economy” is what the mainstream media constantly wants to reassure. There’s just one thing

European stocks were all lower too…

 

But of course, US equities ended higher… again… The Dow and S&P are no up 6 weeks in a row – because noting else matters. NOTE Nasdaq ended the week lower…

 

Tesla was clubbed like a baby seal as Elon Musk’s NYT confessional failed to create the “feel sorry for me” narrative he hyped for… (worst day since March and worst week for Tesla stocks since Feb 2016 – after the best week since May 2013)

TSLA Bonds are leading…

 

FANG Stocks were all ugly too…

 

But AAPL is soaring to new record highs – holding well above the trillion dollar market cap level…

 

Bonds were bid on the week too…

 

10Y Yields ended the week unchanged…

 

Another week, another flattening in the yield curve…

 

FX markets were once again an active space – but the dollar index ended the week modestly lower…(biggest drop in 6 weeks)

 

Despite its bounce – after last week’s collapse – EM FX ended the week lower (3rd week in a row)…

 

The Turkish Lira surged over 6% after last week’s 25%-plus collapse – this is the best week for the Lira since Oct 2008…

 

After nine straight weeks of weakness, offshore yuan strengthened in the week…helped by the late headlines today…

 

Year-to-date, the Argentine Peso and Turkish Lira are now tied for being the dirtiest shirt in the abattoir…

 

Finally in currency-land, cryptos had a serious roller-coaster week with Ethereum crushed and Bitcoin outperforming but the latter half of the week saw a serious bid back in the crypto space…

 

Commodities ended the week lower but the last two days have seen a notable rebound…

 

WTI fell to lowest in 2 months breaking below recent range…

Spot Silver’s weakest since Feb 2016 and has fallen for 10 straight weeks in a row. It’s worst ever run…

 

And finally, we will leave you with this… US macro data is the most disappointing in 11 months, but stocks love it…

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2L1WZe0 Tyler Durden

After Death Threats, Manafort Judge Gets Federal Protection; Jury To Resume Deliberations Monday

The judge in Paul Manafort’s Virginia trial for bank and tax fraud revealed in open court on Friday that he has received death threats, and is now traveling with the protection of the US Marshals Service. 

“I have the marshal’s protection,” Ellis said. “I don’t even go to the hotel alone. I won’t even reveal the name of the hotel.”

“I had no idea this case excited this emotion in the public,” he added.

Manafort also refused to release the names of the jurors at the request of a coalition of news organizations, citing safety reasons. The Washington Post, New York Times, AP, CNN, NBC, Politico and Buzzfeed all requested the names of jurors deliberating in the Manafort case. 

“I don’t feel it’s right if I release their names,” said Ellis. 

Meanwhile, the jurors told Ellis in a Friday afternoon note that they are unlikely to reach a verdict before the weekend, and would like to leave at 5 p.m. so one of the jurors can attend an event. Ellis said he would reconvene court at 10 minutes to 5 p.m. to discuss when they would like to reconvene on Monday. 

Kevin Downing, an attorney for Manafort, told The Hill that he sees the note as a signal the jury will not reach a verdict on Friday. –The Hill

On Thursday, the jury asked Ellis to redefine reasonable doubt, and had additional questions about reporting foreign bank transactions, shelf companies, filing requirements related to income and what evidence relates to each charge.  

via RSS https://ift.tt/2OL1IDn Tyler Durden

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Bans Reporters From Public Town Halls

Democratic socialist House candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez banned reporters from attending several of her public town hall events this week.

Ocasio-Cortez, who shocked the political world by defeating Rep. Joe Crowley (D–N.Y.) in June’s Democratic primary, held sessions with constituents of New York’s 14th Congressional District on Sunday and Wednesday. But while she tweeted out some details about the town halls, she didn’t let members of the media attend in person, according to the Queens Chronicle.

The candidate’s campaign manager, Vigie Ramos Rio, tells the Chronicle the ban was implemented after reporters “mobbed” her last week following a community meeting. The campaign had apparently made it clear there would be “no Q&A and no one-on-one [interviews].”

Corbin Trent, communications director for the campaign, said that was what led to the media ban. “We wanted to help create a space where community members felt comfortable and open to express themselves without the distraction of cameras and press. These were the first set of events where the press has been excluded,” Trent tells the Chronicle. “This is an outlier and will not be the norm. We’re still adjusting our logistics to fit Alexandria’s national profile.”

But many on Twitter weren’t buying it:

Trent later told The Washington Post that the campaign won’t ban reporters in the future. “It’s not been a policy of the campaign,” Trent said. “It won’t be the policy of the campaign.”

Banning reporters isn’t a good look for a politician, particularly one with as high a profile as Ocasio-Cortez. And if she wants to serve in Congress, she’d better get used to being hounded by the press.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2Mmq89v
via IFTTT

Buy Gold, Sell Small Caps – PIMCO Warns Late-Cycle Risks Are Rising

Authored by Mihir Worah via PIMCO,

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • At this stage in the cycle, investors should consider inflation risk, market dispersion, recession risk and other key factors we discuss in our midyear update.

  • We identify five opportunities for the near term as well as provide updated asset allocation views and positioning.

  • Investment opportunities, from an asset allocation view, include shorter-maturity bonds, gold, and large cap equities.

There are ample signs of change in the wind for investors. The Federal Reserve is raising short-term interest rates, and U.S. inflation is at target for the first time since 2012. The global trade order that has existed for decades is being disrupted. Several economic indicators are running hot (see Figure 1) even as the current U.S. expansion has begun its tenth year. Volatility is higher as some investors price a dire outcome while others are more sanguine, creating relative value opportunities.

In this midyear update to our outlook, detailed in our paper “Singles and Doubles,” we discuss some medium- to longer-term themes relating to late-cycle investing as well as some shorter-term opportunities arising from current market dynamics.

Four key themes

INFLATION

We see significant risk of an uptick in inflation, as detailed in our paper, “Inflation Awakening.” We believe investors should understand the inflation sensitivity, or “inflation beta,” of their portfolios. Traditional stocks and bonds tend to respond negatively to inflation surprises (see Figure 2), while real assets not surprisingly tend to respond positively; investors should verify and be comfortable with the inflation betas of their portfolios.

In our view, many investors are underexposed to real assets – such as commodities and inflation-linked bonds – and that strategy has generally worked well over the last several years as shocks to risk assets were accompanied by fears of deflation, vastly diminishing the diversification properties of real assets. However, this may not hold true going forward.

STOCK-BOND CORRELATIONS

When above-average inflation starts being a bigger risk than below-average inflation, bonds become a less reliable diversifier for equities and other risk assets. To be sure, high-quality bonds remain a crucial component of a portfolio allocation, in our view, because they are likely to be the best-performing assets in a recession. Also, as mentioned above, inflation-linked bonds are attractive before inflation accelerates. However, investors who count on large bond overlays to damp volatility of portfolios of risk assets may be in for some surprises. (See Figure 3. Also, recent PIMCO research focuses on the underlying mechanisms of the stock-bond relationship. For more, read “Treasuries, Stocks and Shocks.”)

DISPERSION

For the last several years, investors have been paid for being long just about any asset (other than commodities) as the exceptional influence of central bank liquidity and lower long-term rates boosted valuations. At this stage in the business cycle, however, with the Fed actively hiking rates and reducing the size of its balance sheet, valuations have become stretched and we should start to see greater dispersion in returns across sectors, regions and factor styles. As is well-known in equity markets, the momentum factor tends to underperform and the quality factor outperform late in the cycle. Similarly, credit spreads tend to underperform equities on a risk-adjusted basis and commodities tend to do well overall as demand starts to outstrip supply. Some of these themes have already begun to play out.

Investors should, in our view, stress-test their portfolios at the factor level rather than asset class level to truly understand how it is likely to behave as this cycle plays out. This also underscores the importance of rigorous global research capabilities to pinpoint attractive opportunities in any sector while managing risks. The ability to better analyze the relative value between assets, countries and factors becomes more important than large beta bets.

VOLATILITY

Market volatility has been increasing for a number of reasons. To begin with, there is general uncertainty around a possible turn in the cycle. Another reason is the potential for implicit portfolio hedges (such as bond overlays) to become less predictable amid greater inflation risk, leading many investors to de-risk by selling assets and reducing leverage. In addition, the Fed is normalizing policy and perhaps re-striking the put (i.e., reassessing the state of economic downturn that would warrant a shift to easier policy or extraordinary measures). And all this is accompanied by something new: a potential change to the framework for global trade that has been in place for decades. These reasons suggest reducing portfolio volatility either explicitly or implicitly by going up in quality, reducing leverage, raising liquidity or purchasing downside hedges. Many investors avoid these strategies in the belief that they all mean reducing yield and giving up potential returns. However, in light of the uncertainties across many markets, we believe return potential over a two-year horizon will likely be better if these strategies are judiciously employed.

Five investment opportunities

With market dynamics shifting and the potential for greater change ahead, investors may find it difficult to determine optimal portfolio positioning. Here are five investment opportunities we see.

SHORTER-MATURITY BONDS

Taking a simplified view, yield curves tend to flatten late in the cycle as the Fed hikes more than expected and then steepen in a recession as the Fed cuts rates. The yield curve has been following this playbook during this Fed hiking cycle, but for a number of reasons we think the flattening is overdone and the risk/reward trade-off favors fading this move.

Three main reasons for the flattening (in addition to late-cycle Fed hiking) are the U.S. Treasury’s decision to stop extending the weighted average maturity of its issuance, the anchoring effect of low long-term global rates, and the ability for U.S. corporations to currently deduct pension contributions at the 2017 tax rate of 39% rather than the new 20% tax rate, leading to a rush to buy long-dated bonds. We feel all of these are likely to reverse as the large U.S. deficit combined with the Fed’s balance sheet unwinding will supply plenty of long bonds to the market, the European Central Bank is expected to end its own quantitative easing program by the end of this year, and the Bank of Japan signals possible flexibility in its pegging of the 10-year rate at 0%. Finally, the window for the higher deduction rate for pension fund contributions ends in September.

“Shorter-term U.S. corporate bonds are offering more attractive yields than they have in years.”

A simpler expression of this trade is to simply invest in shorter-term U.S. corporate bonds, which are offering more attractive yields than they have in years due to a combination of Fed rate hikes, accompanied by wider Libor and credit spreads. Their shorter maturity not only makes them less sensitive to higher rates, but they may also be more defensive in the event of a slowdown or recession.

BASKET OF EM CURRENCIES

Emerging market (EM) assets came off a torrid 2017, but have had a tough run in 2018 as Fed hikes, fears of tariffs and trade conflicts, and political uncertainty in Mexico, Brazil, Turkey and Argentina have weighed on the market. Emerging markets are indeed highly geared to global growth and global trade. Moreover, institutions often aren’t mature enough to handle political change. Any unanticipated slowdown could lead to further underperformance. However, we feel the underperformance is overdone given current risks, and there are pockets of value in EM that rigorous research and an active management approach can uncover. As we discuss in the sidebar, there appears to be an unexplained risk premium associated with EM currencies, which leads us to conclude that a diversified and appropriately sized investment should be part of any long-term asset allocation.

GOLD

Gold is a real asset that not only serves as a store of value but also a medium of exchange, and that tends to outperform in risk-off episodes. As such, one would expect gold to outperform during the recent period of rising inflation expectations along with rising recession risk. Yet counterintuitively it has been underperforming relative to its historical average (see Figure 6).

We believe this is because in the near term, gold’s properties as a metal and as a currency are causing it to drop amid trade tensions and the stronger U.S. dollar, dominating its properties as a long-term store of value. This leads, in our view, to an opportunity to add a risk-off hedge to portfolios at an attractive valuation.

LARGE CAP VERSUS SMALL CAP

Small cap stocks have had a good run, outperforming the S&P 500 by close to 5% so far this year. One of the rationales for this outperformance is that small cap stocks are more domestically oriented and hence less exposed to trade wars and tariffs. While this view has some merits, we feel buying lower quality, lower value, higher volatility small cap stocks is unlikely to lead to outperformance should a real trade war commence.

Consistent with the theme for high quality to outperform at this stage of the business cycle, and given attractive entry points, we favor an overweight of large cap relative to small cap.

ALTERNATIVE RISK PREMIA

Higher volatility and stretched valuations are likely to result in lower risk-adjusted returns from traditional risk premia like equity, duration and credit. While smart beta strategies have been proliferating recently, so far these have mostly focused on equities, an asset class that has been well-mined by academics but where it is still possible to find risk premia and alpha strategies that are uncorrelated to the business cycle.

Meanwhile, there is a rich universe of strategies available in the fixed income and commodity markets that can be combined with equities and currencies to form diversified portfolios that seek to harness the benefits of alternative risk premia. Including diversifying but liquid strategies is important, as many strategies that earn an “illiquidity” premium, such as private equity and venture investing, also have a high beta (correlation) to equity markets, which may not be desirable at the current phase of the business cycle.

“Lofty valuations, an aging expansion and changing rules for global trade are leading to a tricky investment environment.”

Lofty valuations, an aging expansion and changing rules for global trade are leading to a tricky investment environment. While recession indicators are not flashing a red warning signal that a downturn is imminent, which would imply a retreat to a defensive position, they are flashing a yellow “caution” signal. This coupled with expectations for higher volatility suggest a regime of careful portfolio construction and opportunistic investments. In this piece we have highlighted four themes to consider when constructing portfolios and five opportunistic investments across asset classes that we believe will position investors for attractive risk-adjusted returns in the uncertain times ahead.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2L1GZJ2 Tyler Durden

The Turkish “Doom Loop” In One Chart

In a scathing report published earlier today, rating agency Fitch which last month downgraded Turkey to BB, “outlook negative”, warned that the moves taken by the Turkish government remain insufficient to restore credibility, and said that the incomplete political response cannot fully address underlying causes of lira’s fall, namely large current account deficit & external financing requirements, the country’s burgeoning USD-denominated debt load and added that even should the country raise rates – which Erdogan has vowed he won’t do – the abrupt tightening in financial conditions will sharpen the slowdown in GDP growth already under way.

In short, “the absence of an orthodox monetary policy response to the lira’s fall, and the rhetoric of the Turkish authorities have increased the difficulty of restoring economic stability and sustainability.”

Yet while traders have speculated that a rate hike, while insufficient, would be a welcome first step toward stabilizing the Turkish economy (along with an IMF bailout and/or capital controls) and is far more needed than tinkering with the Lira’s liquidity conditions to “burn the shorts” (to borrow a phrase from Elon Musk), some have suggested that even a rate hike would no longer be sufficient to prevent the death spiral that Turkey finds itself in.

As Bloomberg’s Marcus Ashworth wrote recently, “officials need to demonstrate a total change of attitude, and clearly signal that this won’t be a case of “one and done.” Investors need to see that a series of increases are on their way, and that they will continue until inflation is controlled. This is the only way the doom loop can be broken.”

Alas, even that would not be sufficient to break Turkey’s so-called doom loop.

For starters, Turkish inflation has been out of control for a while, and the current account has been in deficit for years.

While investors have in the past ignored Erdogan’s obstinate refusal to accept basic economic fundamentals, things have taken on a distinct urgency as a result of the diplomatic spat with Trump which has exposed Erdogan’s stubborn intransigence to resolve Turkey’s lingering problems (which in turn will only make them worse).

For one, absent capital controls which he vowed he won’t do to avoid an investor panic, Erdogan can’t close down Turkey’s financial borders. The president is in charge of what for now at least is an open economy that is extremely reliant on external dollar funding…

… which means that not only are the tools of economic warfare out of his hands, one potential weapon — capital controls — has the potential to seriously worsen the situation, and the self-fulfilling contagion that would ensue has been dubbed the “worst case scenario.”

There is also the direct link to the Turkish banking sector, which has become especially vulnerable as a result of the lira’s freefall, resulting in a surge of nonperforming loans as borrowers are suddenly unable to repay their debt, especially if it is dollar-denominated. And much of it is: some 40% percent of the nation’s corporate lending is in foreign currencies, a proportion that only grows as the currency declines.

Then there is the debt sold by the banks themselves:

Lenders have traditionally borrowed dollars and euros by tapping foreign bank syndicates, which have been keen to lend foreign currency out to one year in order to access the juicy yields on offer in the domestic corporate debt market. For many years, western banks have subsidized that market by lending at below-market rates — financing has typically been around 120-130 basis points more than Libor.

Turkish banks so far havent’ had to pay a bigger margin to access foreign-currency loans as the big debt maturities only kick in next month, although with banks facing $16 billion in foreign FX denominated bond maturities until 2019, that hasn’t kept bank bonds from tumbling in recent days, as we discussed earlier this week.

A catastrophic sign would be if foreign banks started to pull back substantially from lending syndicates as banks seek to tap foreign markets, and as unable to rollover maturing debt. Clear evidence of a withdrawal here would the beginning of the end for lenders and companies.

Putting these various factors together, JPMorgan has created the following circular schematic, showing Turkey’s so-called “doom loop”, or the negative feedback loop that demonstrates why Erdogan may have no actionable choices to break the country’s toxic spiral:

  1. Turkish Lira plunges, central bank hikes rates, raising funding costs for everyone in the economy
  2. Domestic borrowers, unable to fund the surging interest expense, scramble to deleverage
  3. A sharp growth slowdown emerges, even as inflation remains persistently high
  4. Non-performing loans soar as borrowers are unable to repay their lenders
  5. Bank assets liquidation accelerates, raising concerns over the health of the local banking sector
  6. Foreign lenders pull back until there is stability in the economy, meanwhile making FX-debt rollover impossible
  7. The lira plunges more, forcing even higher rates and the cycle repeats anew.

This is shown visually in the JJPM chart beow.

And finally, since it is all about the debt in the Turkish economy, here is another infographic from JPM which maps all the debt in the Turkish economy.

So is there really no exit for Erdogan?

Not at all: both Erdogan and the rest of the emerging markets would be saved overnight if two necessary and sufficient things happened (as Macquarie explained earlier): i) the Fed stops hiking rates, and restoring global liquidity by sending the dollar sharply lower, and ii) China and the US reach a compromise on trade, allowing China to stop worrying about its domestic troubles and resumes reflating the global economy, which for most of 2016 and 2017 allowed emerging markets to be one of the best performing assets in the world. Or as Viktor Shvets put it, the “US determines global liquidity and cost of capital while also providing end-user demand, while China is able to reflate global economy through its intensive commodity & investment business model, sheltered behind capital controls.

How likely those two things are to happen? We leave it up to readers.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2MjzBy5 Tyler Durden

Will California’s Proposed Bail Reforms Lead to More People Behind Bars?

Reason bail reform coverSupporters of bail reform are turning against a California bill that they initially helped craft, fearing changes in the legislation could actually lead to increased jailing of those who are awaiting trial.

California is looking to follow in the footsteps of states like New Jersey and Alaska and eliminate as much as possible the use of cash bail to decide who is detained in jail awaiting trial. The overdependence on cash bail in our pretrial justice system has led to hundreds of thousands of Americans sitting in jail cells who haven’t yet been convicted and are not deemed dangers to the community or flight risks; they simply cannot afford the bail money the courts have demanded.

SB10, introduced in California last year, would replace cash bail schedules with a risk assessment and pretrial system in which courts would determine who is jailed prior to trial on defined dangers to the community or flight risks, not on money. The goal would be to detain only those that the courts worry would either skip out on trial or potentially hurt other people if they were free.

This would be a huge change in the way many courts in California operate, and there are some challenges here. Eliminating cash bail can mean many more poor people don’t have to languish in jail (disrupting their lives and livelihoods) waiting for trial. But it also means judges and courts are granted the power to detain people with no way of seeking release at all. This can end up backfiring. In Maryland, where judges were told to reduce their reliance on cash bail, some communities (Baltimore in particular) saw an increase in the number of people who were being detained in jail prior to trial.

Criminal justice reform advocates are therefore very particular in how they want to see the pretrial system reformed. The goal is to get more people out, not leave more people stuck. These advocates were involved in crafting SB10. But the text of the bill since it was first introduced has been changed. And those changes have caused some who helped craft the bill in the first place to either turn against it or at least turn away from it because they fear it will now lead to greater numbers of Californians being held in jail while waiting for trial.

Central to this fear are any potential biases that could be introduced by whatever assessment tool is used to calculate the risk involved in releasing a defendant prior to trial. Civil rights group fear that an overdependence on algorithmic mechanisms to calculate a defendant’s risk factor can—when ineptly applied—instead reinforce the same systemic biases that have led to the pretrial incarceration problem in the first place. Some assessment tools that operate on the basis of demographic data—where a person lives, employment status, nonviolent crime history—stick a person in a higher risk category partly because of past biased policing practices. A pack of civil rights and criminal justice reform organizations recently signed onto a letter expressing their fears about reliance on assessment tools and explaining six principles they want used to make sure that these tools didn’t continue to perpetuate biases that keep poor minorities trapped in jail even before they’ve been convicted of a crime.

The American Civil Liberties Union of California, one of the groups involved in crafting SB10, put out a statement yesterday withdrawing support for the bill because the new changes seem to run into this problem. The bill does call for the creation and implementation of assessment tools that would reduce biases in the decision process, and it will require the collection of demographic data about race and gender and other factors to determine whether these pretrial decisions are being made fairly. But it vests all the power over the development and implementation of these assessment tools to the courts themselves. California’s Judicial Council, the policy-making body of the state’s court system, will be calling the shots.

This is not how many bail reformers want to see change happen. The ACLU wants the development and implementation of these assessment tools to be more independent of the state’s judicial system. Natasha Minsker, the center director for the ACLU of California Center for Advocacy and Policy, explained why the ACLU was no longer supporting the bill and is now taking a neutral stance:

Any model must include data collection that allows independent analysis to identify racial bias in the system, supports the use of independent pretrial service agencies recognized as the best practice in pretrial justice, and ensures stronger due process protections for all Californians, no matter where they live.

Jeff Adachi, a public defender in San Francisco, is taking a harder line than the ACLU. He thinks SB10 will actually make problems worse. He believes the bill gives judges far too much power to detain defendants prior to trial. As he writes in the San Francisco Chronicle:

The legislation would also undermine our constitutional right to equality before the law by sorting defendants using crude “risk assessment” tools that are notoriously biased against people of color and the poor. It would then erode due process rights by granting judges overly broad powers to throw these people in jail before trial without input from defense attorneys or the community.

This fracture among reform advocates, combined with the bail industry lobbying hard against the bill, might make it tough to pass.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2wcg6wH
via IFTTT