UAE Tanker “Disappears” In Persian Gulf, US Blames Iran

The plight of a “mystery” UAE tanker that’s gone missing in the Persian Gulf now threatens to again send tensions with Iran soaring. Its location transmission signal was turned off Sunday as it drifted toward Iranian waters and it hasn’t been heard from since, with even United Arab Emirates officials staying silent about it. The AP reports:

Tracking data shows an oil tanker based in the United Arab Emirates traveling through the Strait of Hormuz drifted off into Iranian waters and stopped transmitting its location over two days ago, raising concerns Tuesday about its status amid heightened tensions between Iran and the U.S.

The report details that the Riah, a 58-meter oil tanker which operates frequently in the region, switched off its transponder for the first time in three months after 11pm on Saturday, based on tracking data. 

File image: A fishing boat speeds past an oil tanker in the distance in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates. Source: AP

As of Monday “red flags” were raised as US officials began inquiring of the Riah’s status. CNN’s Pentagon correspondent Barbarra Starr had this to say based on intelligence sources: “US intel increasingly believes UAE tanker MT RIAH forced into Iranian waters over the weekend by #IRGC naval forces. UAE isn’t talking.”

However, this could be another case of hawkish US intelligence and defense officials hyping a false threat. Starr continued based on her source: “Some Gulf sources say ship simply broke down/towed by Iran. US says though no contact with crew. Last location Qesham Island.

Following the UK’s controversial and aggressive move to seize a tanker carrying 2 million barrels of Iranian oil of Gibraltar earlier this month, Tehran’s military has threatened to in turn intercept UK vessels.

This also comes after repeat pledges over the past year by Iran’s leaders following a US sanctions campaign that if Iran is blocked from exporting its oil out of the gulf then no country would be able to traverse the vital oil shipping lanes either. 

developing…

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2lBsLYh Tyler Durden

Mark Sanford, Old Trump Foe, May Enter Republican Presidential Primary

President Trump may have another primary challenger in the 2020 election. In an interview with The Post and Courier, former South Carolina Rep. Mark Sanford said that he planned to spend the next month deciding whether or not he would enter the upcoming presidential Republican primary.

“Sometimes in life you’ve got to say what you’ve got to say, whether there’s an audience or not for that message,” he said in the interview. “I feel convicted.”

Sanford, who largely advocated for limited government during his time in Congress, has criticized Trump several times in the past for lacking a firm grasp on the Constitution, wanting to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and even his “shithole” countries comment.

Sanford lost his Republican primary in 2018. His loss was believed to be an early indicator of the weakness of anti-Trump Republicans in the face of a newer, more Trumpian party.

So far, Trump’s only primary opponent is former Massachusetts governor and Libertarian Party vice presidential candidate Bill Weld. Upon making the announcement, Weld referred to himself as a “Reagan Republican.” He has since criticized Trump for not being economically conservative.

There is also speculation that Rep. Justin Amash (I–Mich.) could join the race. Amash has very recently left the Republican Party, as well as his congressional committees. Whether he chooses to run as a Republican, Libertarian, or independent, it’s possible that his entry into the race could disrupt both Trump and the eventual Democratic nominee’s 2020 dreams.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2kehCw7
via IFTTT

Christine Lagarde To Resign From IMF On September 12th

With her confirmation to succeed Mario Draghi as president of the ECB virtually assured, Christine Lagarde will resign from her position as the head of the IMF later on September 12th.

I have met with the Executive Board and submitted my resignation from the Fund with effect from September 12, 2019. The relinquishment of my responsibilities as Managing Director announced previously will remain in effect until then. With greater clarity now on the process for my nomination as ECB President and the time it will take, I have made this decision in the best interest of the Fund, as it will expedite the selection process for my successor.

The Executive Board will now be taking the necessary steps to move forward with the process for selecting a new Managing Director. David Lipton remains our Acting Managing Director.”

Following her nomination by the European Council, Lagarde temporarily relinquished her duties at the IMF.

Despite having no experience with central banking and no formal economics training, Lagarde received the endorsement of a group of European finance ministers last week. She will now face a vetting session and confirmation hearing in the European Parliament.

Lagarde

Should she be confirmed, she will take over from Mario Draghi on Nov. 1. It’s widely believed that she will carry over the same uber-dovish policy stance that recently prompted Draghi to declare that the ECB will use any and all tools to bolster growth and inflation.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ke1sCW Tyler Durden

Insanity: Now even JUNK bonds have NEGATIVE yields

75 years ago this month, a group of 744 delegates from around the world gathered at the very posh Mount Washington Hotel in New Hampshire to build a brand new global financial system.

The year was 1944. World War II was still raging in Europe and the Pacific.

But with the successful invasion of Normandy well underway, the Allies knew that Hitler’s days were numbered. And they needed to start preparing for a post-war world.

Everyone knew the US would emerge from World War II as the the dominant superpower.

So the financial system they designed put the United States at the center of the world economy.

They called it the Bretton Woods system, named for the town in New Hampshire where they gathered.

And their central idea was that the value of the US dollar would be fixed to gold at a rate of $35 per troy ounce, while every other currency would be fixed to the US dollar.

The Swiss franc, for example, was fixed at a rate of 4.3 francs per US dollar, while the Danish krone was fixed at 4.8.

Bretton Woods ushered in a period of remarkable economic stability worldwide.

During the roughly quarter-century that the Bretton Woods system was in place, banking crises were almost nonexistent. Recessions were rare.

And global debt fell from nearly 150% of GDP at the end of World War II, to roughly 30% by the early 1970s.

Then it all came to a screeching halt in 1971.

The United States, weighed down by a costly war in Vietnam, suddenly and unilaterally terminated the agreement.

The US government wanted the flexibility to print as much money as it needed without being forced to maintain the gold standard.

So the whole system collapsed, practically overnight.

And it was replaced by a new standard where unelected central bankers have supreme authority to conjure near infinite quantities of money out of thin air.

The effects have been pretty disastrous.

Ever since the end of Bretton Woods, global debt has skyrocketed to roughly $200 TRILLION, approximately 225% of GDP.

Banking crises and financial shocks have become much more commonplace. Market crashes are more severe. Recessions are more common. Inflation worldwide has soared.

(It’s ironic that, back in 1944, the price of a room at the Mount Washington was $18. Today it’s over $250.)

Perhaps most of all, we now regularly witness some of the most extreme financial anomalies imaginable.

And one of the most obvious examples of this is negative interest rates.

In a number of countries, including Switzerland, Japan, Denmark, and the entire Eurozone, central bankers have printed so much money that interest rates are actually negative.

If you buy a TEN YEAR German government bond, for instance, your annual investment return will be NEGATIVE 0.27% per year, based on this morning’s rates.

That’s insane.

But just a few days ago the insanity reached a whole new level.

According to the Wall Street Journal, there are now some JUNK BONDS in Europe that have negative yields.

Think about this: a junk bond is basically debt issued by a company with financials so risky that analysts expect there’s a good chance the company won’t pay its debts.

Hell, the company might not even be in business by the time the debt matures.

And yet, despite these substantial risks, investors are willing to loan money to these companies… at NEGATIVE rates of return.

Seriously?? You take all that risk and then GUARANTEE that you’ll lose money.

Honestly I’m not a pessimistic person. But this sort of absurdity makes me pause and consider what might happen next.

The global economic expansion is one of the longest on record, ever. Financial markets around the world are soaring at all-time highs. Stocks. Bonds. Real Estate.

One of the only things we know for sure about financial markets is that they are ALWAYS cyclical. Up/Down, Boom/Bust. These cycles have been with us forever.

It’s impossible to predict exactly WHEN the decline will occur. But when you see JUNK bonds with NEGATIVE yields, it’s likely that we’re probably close to the end of the boom phase.

It’s possible this madness could continue for a while longer. Or it could end tomorrow.

No one has a crystal ball… but the important fact is to realize that at some point, this trend has got to correct.

All the trillions of dollars printed out of thin air to buy securities that yield negative interest rates will eventually have consequences.

That’s why I think makes sense to take sensible steps to protect yourself… no matter what happens next.

That’s why I own gold.

Gold is still one of the only asset classes in the world that’s not anywhere near an all-time high (unlike stocks, bonds and real estate).

In fact, relative to what’s going on in the world, gold is downright cheap.

Gold is something people tend to buy in times of uncertainty… and right now, there is a lot of uncertainty.

Between trade disputes, financial madness, and the Bolsheviks coming to power, I see a lot of reasons to own gold.

Gold is also at an interest tipping point: gold supplies around the world are falling, and that could be a major catalyst for much higher gold prices in the future.

It’s never a good idea to dump all your life savings into any one thing. But at a time when central banks are printing more money out of thin air, and the bull market is long in the tooth, allocating a portion of your savings to gold can make a lot of sense.

As part of Sovereign Man’s 10th anniversary celebration, I’d also like to share another complimentary preview of one of our premium reports.

Inside, you’ll learn three ways to profit from gold’s likely surge.

And for a limited time I’d like to extend you a rare invitation to join our flagship international diversification service, Sovereign Man: Confidential, at over 60% off.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/2kb6nVn
via IFTTT

Bank Run: Deutsche Bank Clients Are Pulling $1 Billion A Day

There is a reason James Simons’ RenTec is the world’s best performing hedge fund – it spots trends (even if they are glaringly obvious) well ahead of almost everyone else, and certainly long before the consensus.

That’s what happened with Deutsche Bank, when as we reported two weeks ago, the quant fund pulled its cash from Deutsche Bank as a result of soaring counterparty risk, just days before the full – and to many, devastating – extent of the German lender’s historic restructuring was disclosed, and would result in a bank that is radically different from what Deutsche Bank was previously (see “The Deutsche Bank As You Know It Is No More“).

In any case, now that RenTec is long gone, and questions about the viability of Deutsche Bank are swirling – yes, it won’t be insolvent overnight, but like the world’s biggest melting ice cube, there is simply no equity value there any more – everyone else has decided to eliminate their counterparty risk as regards DB, and according to Bloomberg, clients of Deutsche Bank, mostly hedge funds, have started a “bank run”, one which has culminated with about $1 billion per day being pulled from the bank.

As a result of the modern version of this “bank run”, where it’s not depositors but counterparties that are pulling their liquid exposure from DB on fears another Lehman-style lock up could freeze their funds indefinitely, Deutsche Bank is considering how to transfer some €150 billion ($168 billion) of balances held in Deutsche Bank’s prime-brokerage unit – along with technology and potentially hundreds of staff – to French banking giant BNP Paribas.

The problem, as Bloomberg notes, is that such a forced attempt to change prime-broker counterparties, would be like herding cats, as the clients had already decided they have no intention of sticking with Deutsche Bank, and would certainly prefer to pick their own PB counterparty than be assigned one by the Frankfurt-based bank. Alas, the problem for DB is that with the bank run accelerating, pressure on the bank to complete a deal soon is soaring.

Here are the dynamics in a nutshell, (via Bloomberg): Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing is pulling back from catering to risky hedge-fund clients, i.e. running a prime brokerage, as he attempts to radically overhaul the troubled German lender while BNP CEO Jean-Laurent Bonnafe wants to expand in the industry. A deal of this magnitude would be a stark example of the German firm’s retreat from global investment banking while potentially transforming its French rival from a small player in the so-called prime-brokerage industry to one of Europe’s biggest.

Of course, publicly telegraphing that DB is in dire liquidity straits and needs an in-kind transfer of its prime brokerage book would spark an outright panic, and so instead the story has been spun far more palatably, i.e., “BNP is providing “continuity of service” to Deutsche Bank’s prime-brokerage and electronic-equity clients as the two companies discuss transferring over technology and staff“, according to a July 7 statement. The ultimate goal of the talks is for BNP to take over the vast majority of client balances, which are slightly less than $200 billion currently.

There is just one problem: nothing is preventing those clients who would be forcibly moved from a German banking giant to a French banking giant from redeeming their funds. And that’s just what they are doing.

Which is why the final shape of the deal remains, pardon the pun, fluid, and it is unclear how it will proceed, facing a multitude of complexities, including departing clients.

In an attempt to stop the bank run, BNP executives are meeting with U.S. hedge-fund clients this week to convince them to stay following similar sit-downs with European funds last week, Bloomberg sources said.

However, if this gambit fails, and hedge funds keep moving their business elsewhere, officials at the German bank may just relegate its assets tied to the prime finance division into the newly formed Capital Release Unit, i.e. the infamous “bad bank” which is winding down unwanted assets totaling 288 billion euros ($324 billion) of leverage exposure, and the prime brokerage is responsible for much of the 170 billion euros of leverage exposure that’s coming from the equities division into the division, also known as CRU, a presentation shows.

It also means that countless hegde funds are at risk of being gated on whatever liquid exposure they have toward Deutsche Bank.

To be sure, Deutsche Bank’s hedge fund balances have been declining throughout the year as speculation swirled around Sewing’s intentions for the prime brokerage, but the rate of redemptions was far lower than $1 billion per day. Now that the bank jog has become a bank run, the next question is how much liquidity reserves does DB really have and what happen if hedge funds clients – suddenly spooked they will be the last bagholders standing – pull the remaining €150 billion all at once.

We are confident we will get the answer in a few days if not hours, until then please enjoy this chart which compares DB’s stock decline to that of another bank which was gripped by a historic liquidity run in its last days too…

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2jLpGV9 Tyler Durden

Organizer Of Google Sexual Harassment Walkout Leaves The Company

One of the organizers of last November’s massive Google walkout, Meredith Whittaker, has left the company. Her departure, first announced over Twitter by a Google software engineer, was confirmed by the company. 

Whittaker and another walkout organizer, Claire Stapleton said that they faced retaliation after November’s protest against how the company handles sexual harassment and misconduct allegations.

In a message posted to many internal Google mailing lists Monday, Meredith Whittaker, who leads Google’s Open Research, said that after the company disbanded its external AI ethics council on April 4, she was told that her role would be “changed dramatically.” Whittaker said she was told that, in order to stay at the company, she would have to “abandon” her work on AI ethics and her role at AI Now Institute, a research center she cofounded at New York University. –Wired

During the November walkout – sparked by a sweetheart payout to Android co-creator Andy Rubin, who walked away with a $90 million package despite being “credibly accused” of forcing a woman to give him a blowjob in 2013 – employees demanded that the company implement measures against harassment and discrimination, as well as an end to forced arbitration, a safe and anonymous process to report sexual misconduct, and a publicly disclosed sexual harassment transparency report, according to Tech Crunch

Over the past year, Google employees have also protested a Pentagon contract to develop AI, as well as China’s “Project Dragonfly” search project which would help the Chinese government to track and surveil citizens. Amid the controversies, Whittaker was one of the most outspoken voices. 

While at Google, Whittaker also served with AI Now, an ethics organization affiliated with New York University that she co-founded. The group often criticizes businesses and government agencies for using AI systems, like facial recognition, in policing and surveillance. Whittaker also publicly denounced some Google decisions, including the appointment of Kay Coles James, a conservative think tank leader, to an AI ethics board. Google soon nixed the board.

“People in the AI field who know the limitations of this tech, and the shaky foundation on which these grand claims are perched, need to speak up, loudly. The consequences of this kind of BS marketing are deadly (if profitable for a few),” Whittaker wrote on Twitter on Sunday. –Bloomberg

Stapleton, meanwhile, left the company in June – saying that had she remained, she could expect “public flogging, shunning and stress.” 

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2lct9we Tyler Durden

Joe Biden’s New Health Care Plan Is an Admission that Obamacare Doesn’t Work

Joe Biden is pretending to defend Obamacare while implicitly admitting it has failed to live up to its promises. 

Yesterday, the former vice president debuted a new health care plan, which would expand subsidies in the program while creating a new government-run health insurance plan—a “public option”—that would be available inside the exchanges. 

Currently, people who make up to 400 percent of the poverty line, about $48,000 for an individual or about $100,000 for a family of four, are eligible to receive subsidies for coverage purchased through the law’s health insurance exchanges, insulating those people from much of the cost of coverage. Those who make more than the 400 percent threshold, however, tend to face extremely high premiums; Biden’s plan would simply cap premiums at 8.5 percent of household income. The additional subsidies, as well as the implementation of the public option, would cost about $750 billion over a decade, according to his campaign—not too much less than the $940 billion Obamacare was estimated to cost over its first decade. 

Biden’s plan is notable mostly for its explicit rejection of Medicare for All, the single-payer plan proposed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) and backed by rival candidates such as Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.), Kamala Harris (D–Ca.), and Cory Booker (D–N.J.). The Sanders plan would eliminate virtually all private insurance in the space of just four years, forcing everyone into a single government-run insurance system. By any measure, it would be tremendously disruptive, and polls show that even if the idea of Medicare for All is popular, the elimination of private insurance is not.

It is also a defense of Medicare as it exists today, one that mirrors the tack that President Trump and other Republicans have taken against Sanders’ single-payer proposal: At an AARP event last night, Biden warned that with Medicare for All, “Medicare as you know it goes away.”

Biden is apparently betting that by campaigning against Medicare for All, and the socialist tendencies it represents within the Democratic party, he can win over moderate voters. Biden is also framing his approach as a way of preserving and building on top of Obamacare, which as vice president under President Obama, he helped usher into law. 

In a video touting his plan, Biden said he was proud of his work on the health care law, calling it a success, and warning that passing Medicare for All would meaning getting “rid of Obamacare.” The public option, he says, is the best way to “lower costs and cover everyone.” 

Given Biden’s role in the passage of Obamacare, it would be difficult for him to simply run against it because to do so would be to admit that the most prominent initiative of the Obama administration—sorry, the “Obama-Biden administration“—was a failure. Biden’s rivals who are running on Medicare for All, which would blow away the current system, are explicitly running on this notion. 

Yet Biden’s new plan essentially makes this admission anyway. Obamacare was supposed to provide coverage to those who don’t have it and lower the price of health care, but for all intents and purposes, that is the same promise that Biden is now making about his plan.

Indeed, when Biden talks about building on the existing system, he sounds more than a little like Obama did when selling Obamacare: “I believe it makes more sense to build on what works and fix what doesn’t, rather than try to build an entirely new system from scratch,” the former president said in a 2009 speech making the case for the law. Biden is pitching an expensive overhaul of Obamacare on the promise that it would do what Obamacare was supposed to have already done. Which means that for all the feisty back-and-forth about health care policy, nearly all of the Democrats running for president appear to agree on at least one thing: Obamacare isn’t working. 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2lkXicY
via IFTTT

As Wall Street Celebrates Soaring Stocks, Companies Are Literally Shutting Down All Over America

Authored by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

How long can the stock market possibly stay completely disconnected from economic reality? 

On Monday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose just 27 points, but that was good enough to push it to yet another new all-time record high.  Investors have been absolutely thrilled by the extremely impressive bull run that we have witnessed so far in 2019, but there is no way that this is sustainable.  Wall Street may be celebrating for the moment, but meanwhile all of the hard economic numbers are telling us that we have now entered a new economic slowdown.  Just like in 2008, it appears to be inevitable that the party on Wall Street is about to hit a brick wall, but nobody should be surprised when it happens.  Everywhere around us there are signs of economic trouble, and right now companies are literally shutting down all over America.

For example, just take a look at what is happening to the trucking industry.  I recently warned about the trucking “bloodbath” that was unfolding, and over the past week it has greatly accelerated.

On the 12th of July, we learned that trucking giant LME had abruptly shut down.  The following comes from Zero Hedge

Less-than-truckload carrier LME has reportedly “suddenly and abruptly” shut down its operations, according to FreightWaves.

The company is a regional carrier based in Minnesota that operated throughout the Midwest. The company had terminals in 30 locations across the U.S. and through interline agreements services all of North America. It also worked with major companies like 3M, John Deere and Toro.

The company reportedly included “over 600 men and women” and has been listed as having 382 power units and 1,228 trailers, with 424 truck drivers.

Then today we learned that Timmerman Starlite Trucking suddenly shut down without any notice

40 year old California trucking outlet Timmerman Starlite Trucking, Inc. is the latest victim in the “trucking apocalypse” and announced that it would be shutting down effective immediately, according to FreightWaves.

30 employees are expected to lose their jobs as a result. The company is based in a mid sized city about 100 miles east of San Francisco and had a fleet of 30 trucks, 150 trailers and 28 drivers.

The company’s owner cited “a tough freight market and environmental regulations” as reasons for the shut down. The company announced the shutdown on its Facebook page.

Of course those two trucking companies are definitely not the only victims of this “bloodbath”.  According to Business Insider, ALA Trucking, Williams Trucking, Falcon Transport and New England Motor Freight have also completely ceased operations in 2019.

If the U.S. economy really was “booming”, this would not be happening.

Meanwhile, major retailers continue to fall like dominoes.  Charming Charlie is headed for bankruptcy and will be closing all of their stores

Fashion accessory retailer Charming Charlie will close all its stores after going bankrupt for the second time in less than two years. More than 3,000 full- and part-time employees could lose their jobs.

Charming Charlie Holdings Inc. filed for Chapter 11 protection in Delaware with plans for going-out-of-business sales at about 261 stores, according to court documents. The chain expects the liquidation to take about two months.

In addition, we just learned that Fred’s will be shuttering another 129 stores as it desperately attempts to stay alive…

Troubled discount merchandiser Fred’s has announced another round of store closures.

The chain will shutter 129 stores, leaving it with about 80 locations, USA Today reported. Going-out-of business sales have already begun.

Not too long ago, I went to a going out of business sale at a local store that was closing down, and it was definitely depressing.  At one time the shelves had been packed full of products, but by the time I got there people were clawing through the small handfuls of deeply discounted merchandise that still remained.

Sadly, such scenes are being repeated over and over again all around the country.  In fact, things are already so bad that even Manhattan retailing legend Barneys is likely headed for bankruptcy

Barneys may be on the cusp of filing for bankruptcy protection as the luxury Manhattan retailer contends with high rents and shoppers going online, according to two media reports.

Reuters, citing unnamed sources, reported Saturday that Barneys has tapped law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP and is weighing a potential bankruptcy filing among other options that could occur in the coming weeks.

The all-time record for store closings in a single year was set in 2017 when 8,139 stores shut down.

According to a brand new report that was just released, we are on pace to absolutely shatter that old record.

In fact, Coresight says that the number of store closings in the U.S. could hit 12,000by the end of this year…

The “going-out-of-business” sales and liquidation of other brands is expected to continue. Coresight estimates closures could reach 12,000 by the end of the year, the report said.

In The Beginning Of The End, I painted a picture of a future in which America’s communities would be littered by boarded up stores that had been abandoned by major retailers.

Now it is happening right in front of our eyes.

Everything that is taking place in the “real economy” makes perfect sense, and unfortunately our economic problems are likely to accelerate significantly in the months ahead.

What doesn’t make sense is what we are witnessing on Wall Street.

There is no way that stock prices should be rising like this, but financial bubbles don’t typically follow rational patterns.

Instead, they usually just keep going until something comes along to end them.

And considering everything that is going on in the world right now, that “something” could definitely arrive sooner rather than later.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2lvL1lN Tyler Durden

Watch Live: Senate Grills Facebook Crypto Head About “Libra” Digital Currency

Ever since Facebook unveiled its plans to introduce a new ‘stablecoin’ cryptocurrency called Libra, governments around the world have been up in arms, accusing Facebook of trying to undermine global financial stability, sideline fiat currencies and opening up a new avenue for criminals hoping to launder their ill-gotten gains.

Yesterday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin took this fearmongering a step further by warning that crypto could be a ‘national security threat’ and saying that the Treasury Department has “very serious concerns” about Libra (amusingly, the market promptly trolled Mnuchin by piling into bitcoin). And the House has already introduced a bill that would effectively killed Libra before it launches.

On Tuesday morning at 10 am, David Marcus, Facebook’s articulate, press-friendly, head of Calibra (the FB subsidiary charged with overseeing the Libra project) will appear before the Senate Banking Committee for what we expect will be a brutal grilling as both Democrats and Republicans unite in their disdain of the project.

Watch the fireworks live below:

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2lJHctu Tyler Durden

Beijing Slams Trump’s “Totally Misleading” Trade Deal Claims

Virtually since the trade war began back in the spring of 2018, President Trump has warned in tweets, speeches and comments to reporters that the US has the upper hand for one simple reason: The pace of China’s economic growth is slowing, which is a serious problem for the Communist Party – whose mandate to rule is dependent on its ability to lift more Chinese out of poverty.

In Trump’s view, Beijing needs a swift resolution to the trade war to boost growth back above the 6.5% threshold.

The Chinese leadership doesn’t see it that way – and so far at least, they’ve given no indication that they’re in a rush to strike a deal (if anything, the opposite is true).

US

But after the historically poor GDP print from last week (which was, of course, goalseeked to match expectations) President Trump couldn’t help himself and once again bashed Beijing in a tweet, gloating that President Xi and Vice Premier Liu He probably regret sabotaging the original deal. Even though it’s US importers who must bear the costs of Trump’s tariffs, the president again insisted that “tariffs are paid for by China devaluing and pumping not the US taxpayer.”

During comments on Tuesday while chairing a symposium attended by a group of economists and entrepreneurs, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang offered a different perspective: China’s economy has seen steady performance. He blamed the recent weakness on global factors, like slowing trade and a weak global recovery, according to Xinhua.

He also pointed out that some indicators have beat expectations, which is accurate: All three core June economic indicators – retail sales, industrial output and fixed investment – beat sharply lowered expectations.

On Tuesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said China’s first-half pace was a “not bad performance” considering developments in the global economy, and accused Trump of being “totally misleading” with his claims about Beijing’s need for a deal, Reuters reports.

Ultimately, Trump’s argument might fall apart later this month when the first reading on US second-quarter GDP hits. According to the latest reading from the Atlanta Fed’s GDP Nowcast, growth is expected to slow to 1.4%.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2lIGqwS Tyler Durden