Dow Futures Break Key Technical Support, Gold Jumps

Dow futures suddenly dropped at around 0745ET – led by a drop in the dollar and Treasury yields – breaking below its 200-day moving average…

There was no clear catalyst though some suggested an ‘old news’ headline that hit Bloomberg at 0740ET – GIULIANI SAYS COHEN `DEFINITELY’ WAS REIMBURSED – may not have helped. But as Dow futures broke the 200DMA, gold jumped…

 

And Treasury yields have been dropping all night…

As has the dollar…

 

Post-FOMC, Gold is winning…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2JPoFCK Tyler Durden

Mutant Kinder Eggs Come to America: New at Reason

Thanks to a law banning candy that contains “non-nutritive objects,” Kinder Surprise eggs were long prohibited in the United States. The toy they contained was considered an unacceptable risk. In early 2018, that finally changed—sort of. The new Kinder Joy looks similar from a distance but opens to reveal not a hollow chocolate egg but an egg-shaped plastic capsule. A pair of “wafer bites” in a sweet, creamy substance fill one half of the container; a tiny toy is sealed inside the other. A wrapper separates the two, and that apparently suffices to make the product acceptable to the American nanny state.

View this article.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2KAkUSG
via IFTTT

Reddit Co-Founder Says Ethereum Price Will Reach $15,000 This Year

Submitted by Aaron Wood of CoinTelegraph

Alexis Ohanian, a co-founder of Reddit, said that he predicts the price of Ethereum (ETH) will reach $15,000 in 2018, Fortune reports May 2.

Ohanian, who now works full-time at a venture capital (VC) firm Initialized Capital, said in an interview, “At the end of the year, Bitcoin will be at $20,000. And Ethereum will be at $15,000. Great, now people can call me out if I’m wrong.” He said that he’s bullish on ETH because “people are actually building on it.”

Should Ohanian’s prediction prove true, the ETH market cap would soar from $67 bln to nearly $2.5 trln, while Bitcoin would recover to last year’s record high price and market cap of $340 bln.

Ohanian’s firm Initialized Capital has more than $250 mln assets under management and has invested in major cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. Ohanian said in the interview that investing in emerging and innovative technology is a priority for the company. He added that blockchain, while promising, will require one to two years to reach its true potential:

“This year, it’s all about blockchain. Most of it is just hype and BS, just like how it was with [artificial intelligence] and [machine learning]. Most of the really vital, protocol-level, basic infrastructure around software and blockchain will need to get built in the next year or two for us to really see the Web 3.0 we’re really hoping for… These are the types of things I think will build the foundation for a very different, much better Internet.”

Ohanian sold Reddit to publishing house Conde Nast in 2006 for an undisclosed figure between $10 and $20 mln.

In April, CEO of independent financial consulting firm deVere Group Nigel Green predicted that the ETH price would reach $2,500 by the end of 2018. Green says the fourfold increase would come as a result of growing adoption of ETH as well as the use of smart contracts.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2HRM2uV Tyler Durden

Pentagon Accelerates Testing Of New B61 Nuclear Gravity Bomb

President Donald Trump’s promises to rebuild the American nuclear arsenal are starting to bear fruit, and according to a US Air Force general update from May 1, the US has already conducted more than two dozen tests of its new B61-12 guided nuclear gravity bomb.

As Military.com reports, plans to spend over $1 trillion to modernize the US “nuclear triad” – nuclear bombers and missiles launched from land-based silos and submarines – have been fast-tracked thanks to the new Nuclear Posture Review, as well as increased military spending authorized during the Trump administration.

Bomber

As discussed before, the new gravity nuke has been in development for years, but Trump’s orders have sped up testing to the point where most of the air force’s mainstay military planes have been approved to carry it. And it’s widely expected that the B-2 Spirit and the futuristic B-21 Raider will be approved to carry the B61 as well. In addition to testing the B61-12, the NPR also calls for modernizing the air-launched cruise missile and intercontinental ballistic missile components of the nuclear triad.

As it stands, the US nuclear triad consists of the submarine-launched ballistic missiles, strategic bombers, which carry both gravity bombs and cruise missiles, along with land-based ICBMs. But the B61 possess an advanced capability that its cousins don’t: Underground penetration. This allows it to strike fortified command and control centers, while its explosive yield is estimated at 50 kilotons.

“We’ve already conducted 26 engineering, development and guided flight tests,” of the B61-121 gravity bomb Lieutenant General Jack Weinstein told the Air Force Association breakfast on Tuesday. “The program’s doing extremely well,” he said. – Sputnik.

Weinstein explained that the bombs are capable of being carried by the B-52 Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit, which can launch both conventional or nuclear payloads, and also legacy fighters such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-15E Strike Eagle.

“When I say ‘dual-capable aircraft,’ I need to be really specific,” he said. “Dual-capable aircraft is called the B-52 and B-2 – it does conventional and nuclear. It also means F-16s and Strike Eagles, and other aircraft our NATO partners fly.”

During tests back in 2015, the F-35 flew with the B61-12 to measure its vibration in the aircraft’s weapons bay. Both of the fourth-generation fighters will be able to deploy the B61-12 bomb. The B61-12 also conducted its third and final developmental test flight aboard an F-15E in 2015.

RT points out that the US could deploy its new B61 bombs to NATO bases in Europe – something Russia says would be tantamount to a violation of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty.

The US isn’t the only superpower revamping its nuclear arsenal: earlier this year, Russian President Vladimir Putin shocked the world by unveiling during his annual state of the union address a new nuclear ICBM capable of evading US anti-ballistic missile defenses.

One hopes that the US Military Industrial Complex will be foiled in its attempts to put these two weapons in head-to-head combat, even if it means lower profits for shareholders.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2jpjTAP Tyler Durden

Global Stocks, Dollar Slide As Nervous Traders Eye US-China Trade Talks

It has been a confusing 24 hours, with US futures slumping after yesterday’s unexpectedly hawkish-yet-dovish FOMC, which first slammed the dollar, then sent the USD surging, and sparking an equity selloff even as rates remained relatively unchanged. Today’s this confusion spilled over into international markets, with both Asian and European shares retreating, as traders are on edge ahead of the US-China trade talks taking place today and tomorrow.

The weakness continued this morning, when another disappointing euro-zone core CPI number (1.1%, Exp. 1.2%, last 1.3%) led to sharp rally across EGBs, dragging Treasurys higher in response, and bull-flattening the curve as 10Y yields slumped.

And while U.S. equity futures are slowly trying to grind higher from overnight lows, the response among US equities to what has so far been an impressive earnings season has left most of the bulls very disappointed, and judging by recent analyst commentary, 2018 is clearly not going according to plan (to echo what Citi said last month): 

“A slightly disappointing growth reaction thus far to the late 2017 tax cuts, no sign of a meaningful pick-up in inflation pressures and uncertainty generated by the potential for a trade war were always likely to commit the Fed to a steady as she goes message,” said Lee Ferridge of State Street Global Markets. “There might also be a little concern over recent market moves, with stocks flat so far in 2018 while US Treasury yields have moved meaningfully higher, doing some of the Fed’s tightening work for it.”

European equities opened on the backfoot (Eurostoxx 50 -0.2%), perhaps anxious as US-China trade talks start in Beijing. Major bourses are lower on the day whilst Switzerland’s SMI 20 outperforms its peers. Most sectors are in the red with the exception of energy and IT. Logitech (+7.0%) shares soared following earnings, buoying the IT sector along with it. Financials underperform after euro-zone inflation data.

Asian equity markets traded mostly negative following the late US slump on Wednesday, with the Fed seen to remain firmly on track for a June hike. Nonetheless, ASX 200 (+0.9%) was the regional outperformer and gained across all sectors with miners underpinned amid upside in metals, while NAB was among the laggards after a decline in H1 cash profit. Elsewhere, Shanghai Comp. (-0.2%) and Hang Seng (-1.7%) declined after a daily net liquidity drain by the PBoC and amid trade concerns ahead of talks between US and China, with tech and telecoms related stocks pressured after reports the US is considering equipment sales restrictions on Chinese telecom firms over national security concerns. As a reminder, Japan is shut for the remainder of the week.

Of note, the Hang Seng China gauge dropped as much as 2.2% ahead of trade talks between U.S. and China which begin later on Thursday, and dragged the MSCI Asia Pacific lower by 0.2%.

“When you think about the things that have been weighing on the market — the potential for trade war with China, Nafta breaking up, rising rates and of course the potential rolling over in growth — I think the one that is really weighing the most heavily is trade and that’s why the market tends to swing the most violently on every new piece of news,” RiverFront Investment Group Chairman Michael Jones told Bloomberg TV.

Meanwhile, as TSY yields slumped overnight, the USD predictably weakened across the board, undoing some of yesterday’s post-FOMC spike: the Bloomberg dollar index fell for first time in four sessions.

Elsewhere, in FX, the pound erased an earlier advance after U.K. services data undershot forecasts, before fading the move to claw back a 0.2% gain; while the euro pared gains after the euro-area CPI estimate for April came in below the median forecast, it was still higher for the first time in four days; The TRY spiked to a new record low against the USD after both core and headline CPI surprised to the upside with the backdrop of Erdogan’s increasing pressure against higher rates. NOK stronger as Norges Bank does not hint at any dovish changes to rate path. The AUD was the best performing G-10 currency after a larger-than-expected trade surplus.

Treasuries edged higher while emerging-market currencies rebounded from a four-month low; European government bonds all rose following poor Eurozone inflation data, while Australia’s 10-year yield steady at 2.80%.

In commodities, oil prices recovered from yesterday’s post-DoE sell off with prices continuing to factor in the risks surrounding Iranian-US relations with the latest source reports suggesting that US President Trump is reportedly all but decided to end the nuclear agreement with Iran. In other energy newsflow, China’s Sinopec is planning to cut Saudi crude oil loadings by 40% in June for a 2nd month on high prices; according to a UNIPEC official. In the metals scope, spot gold is sitting in modest positive territory following yesterday’s FOMC release and a slightly softer USD. Elsewhere, aluminium prices have risen for the second consecutive session, as attention turns to developments on  US-China trade talks being conducted today. Copper was flat overnight with trade contained amid opposing forces of rising metal prices in China during early trade and a broad risk averse tone.

In geopolitical news, Reuters reported that Trump has all but decided to end nuclear agreement with Iran, according to sources which added it is unclear how he will withdraw from the agreement. Meanwhile, the WSJ added that the US is said to be considering equipment sales restrictions on Chinese telecom firms over national security concerns. In related news, a Chinese trade official commented that China will not accept pre-conditions in trade discussions and that China is more prepared than the US to cope with a trade war.

In central bank news, Norges Bank Interest Rate Decision 0.50% vs. Exp. 0.50% (Prev. 0.50%). Comments stated that outlook and balance of risks have not changed substantially, inflation is below target, as such policy rate will be raised after summer 2018. Krone is weaker than expected as measured by the import weighted exchange rate. There was little new information about growth in the Norwegian economy.

Riksbank’s Jansson said that there is a limit for how expansionary policy can be, but haven’t reached there yet, hopes next step will be tightening of policy; Riksbank’s Skingsley not at the point where rate hikes can begin; Riksbank Governor Ingves says the rate path is a forecast, not a promise.

Today’s busy calendar includes data on jobless claims, trade balance and factory orders. DowDuPont, Bombardier, Cigna and Ferrari are among companies reporting earnings

Bulletin Headline Summary from RanSquawk:

  • Norges Bank maintains post-summer hike guidance, Riksbank sticks to end of year
  • UK Services PMI and Eurozone CPI miss expectations
  • Looking ahead, highlights include US trade, weekly jobs, ISM non-mfg, factory orders, a slew of speakers and earnings

Market Wrap

  • S&P 500 futures up 0.2% to 2,633.50
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.2% to 386.55
  • MSCI Asia Pacific down 0.2% to 172.83
  • MSCI Asia Pacific ex Japan down 0.5% to 563.89
  • Nikkei down 0.2% to 22,472.78
  • Topix down 0.2% to 1,771.52
  • Hang Seng Index down 1.3% to 30,313.37
  • Shanghai Composite up 0.6% to 3,100.86
  • Sensex down 0.05% to 35,159.39
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.8% to 6,098.28
  • Kospi down 0.7% to 2,487.25
  • German 10Y yield rose 0.2 bps to 0.583%
  • Euro up 0.4% to $1.2002
  • Italian 10Y yield rose 0.5 bps to 1.535%
  • Spanish 10Y yield fell 0.9 bps to 1.302%
  • Brent futures up 0.2% to $73.52/bbl
  • Gold spot up 0.6% to $1,313.06
  • U.S. Dollar Index down 0.1% to 92.40

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • The dollar fell after the Federal Reserve seemed less hawkish than some had positioned for; the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index slipped for the first time in four days; 10-year Treasuries rose for the first time in three days
  • The greenback weakened against all its G-10 peers; Norway’s krone saw the biggest advance Thursday after the Norges Bank reiterated that it could lift interest rates after the summer
  • The pound erased an earlier advance after U.K. services data undershot forecasts, before fading the move to claw back a 0.2% gain; while the euro pared gains after the euro-area CPI estimate for April came in below the median forecast, it was still higher for the first time in four days
  • Stocks in Europe followed Asian peers lower as investors began to switch their attention away from the Fed and back to earnings and the outlook for global trade ahead of talks between Chinese and U.S. officials
  • China won’t succumb to “threats” from the U.S., a senior government official said, hours before talks are to begin Thursday with a delegation of the Trump administration’s top trade policy officials
  • Federal Reserve officials made doubly sure to convey a relaxed attitude toward inflation rising above 2%, mentioning the “symmetric” nature of their target twice in a statement Wednesday that signaled no intention to accelerate a gradual tightening of monetary policy
  • The U.S. Treasury announced it will lift long-term debt sales by $73b this quarter
  • If billionaire bond investor Bill Gross is right, most of this year’s excitement in the Treasury market is done and yields won’t see a substantial move from here
  • Theresa May is facing a crisis after pro-Brexit ministers paired up with Conservative hardliners to demand a clean break from the European Union’s customs system
  • Eurozone Apr. CPI Estimate y/y: 1.2% vs 1.3% est; Core CPI 0.7% vs 0.9% est; Services CPI 1.0% vs 1.5% prev.
  • U.K. Apr. Services PMI: 52.8 vs 53.5 est; Markit note the underlying performance of the economy has continued to deteriorate
  • Norges Bank holds rates at 0.50% as expected; says upturn in the economy appears to be continuing broadly in line with the March policy report
  • Turkey Apr. CPI y/y: 10.9% vs 10.5% est; Core CPI 12.2% vs11.5% est

European equities opened on the backfoot (Eurostoxx 50 -0.2%) as US-Sino trade talks start in Beijing. Major  bourses are lower on the day whilst Switzerland’s SMI 20 outperforms its peers. Most sectors are in the red with the exception of energy and IT. Logitech (+7.0%) shares soared following earnings, buoying the IT sector along with it. Glencore (+1.1%) is at the top of the FTSE following pleasing production numbers. Other individual movers post-earnings include: Veolia (+2.5%), Gerberit (+3.1%), Infineon (+0.9%), Vonovia (-1.4%) and Smith & Nephew (-6.0%).

Top European News

  • U.K. Services Disappoint as Economy Stays Stuck in Slow Lane
  • Norway Sticks to Tightening Plan as Rate Held at Record Low
  • Danske Bank Is Slammed by Regulator in Money Laundering Probe
  • Starwood Capital Sells $1.1 Billion Portfolio of U.K. Hotels

Asian equity markets traded mostly negative following the weakness on Wall St post-FOMC, with the Fed seen to remain firmly on track for a June hike. Nonetheless, ASX 200 (+0.9%) was the regional outperformer and gained  across all sectors with miners underpinned amid upside in metals, while NAB was among the laggards after a decline in H1 cash profit. Elsewhere, Shanghai Comp. (-0.2%) and Hang Seng (-1.7%) declined after a daily net liquidity drain by the PBoC and amid trade concerns ahead of talks between US and China, with tech and telecoms related stocks pressured after reports the US is considering equipment sales restrictions on Chinese telecom firms over national security concerns. As a reminder, Japan is shut for the remainder of the week. US is said to be considering equipment sales restrictions on Chinese telecom firms over national security concerns. In related news, a Chinese trade official commented that China will not accept pre-conditions in trade discussions and that China is more
prepared than the US to cope with a trade war.

Top Asian News

  • Mahathir Probed Under Malaysia Fake News Law for Sabotage Claim
  • Fed Adds to List of Reasons Why Asia Stock Investors Are Jittery
  • Little Known China Biotech Firm Lures Top Global Stock Fund
  • Turkish Investors Get Reality Check After Inflation Accelerates

In FX, it has been very choppy trade for the DXY in the FOMC aftermath, but ultimately the index has pulled back from fresh 2018 highs around 92.830 made in the run-up to circa 92.500. To recap, the Fed’s latest assessment acknowledged inflation rising to within a whisker of its target rate, but was less upbeat on the pace of economic activity and unexpectedly added a degree of flexibility around the 2% price mandate, which has been perceived dovishly.  CAD: Another beneficiary of the broad Greenback downturn amidst rebounding oil prices and looking ahead to Canadian trade data that is expected to reveal a narrower deficit. Usd/Cad is back down in the low 1.2800 area and eyeing residual bids from 1.2820-00 that were not quite filled recently. EUR/GBP: Both movers on independent factors, as Eur/Usd revisited sub-1.1950 lows on the back of weaker than consensus Eurozone CPI and Cable retreated from 1.3600+ again in wake of the UK services PMI miss that has dragged BoE hike expectations for next week down to single digits from almost odd-on this time last month. Tech supports eyed in Eur/Usd still the major 1.1936 Fib and for Cable 1.3550. NOK/SEK: Contrasting fortunes for the 2 Scandi Crowns as the Nok is underpinned by the Norges Bank reaffirming intentions to hike ‘after Summer’ this year, but the Riksbank reiterates no tightening until the end of 2018. However, Eur/Nok and Eur/Sek are both softer on a weaker single currency

In commodities, oil prices have recovered from yesterday’s post-DoE sell off with prices continuing to factor in the risks surrounding Iranian-US relations with the latest source reports suggesting that US President Trump is reportedly all but decided to end the nuclear agreement with Iran. In other energy newsflow, China’s Sinopec is planning to cut Saudi crude oil loadings by 40% in June for a 2nd month on high prices; according to a UNIPEC official. In the metals scope, spot gold is sitting in modest positive territory following yesterday’s FOMC release and a slightly softer USD. Elsewhere, aluminium prices have risen for the second consecutive session, as attention turns to developments on  US-China trade talks being conducted today. Copper was flat overnight with trade contained amid opposing forces of rising metal prices in China during early trade and a broad risk averse tone.

Looking at the day ahead, the April CPI report and March PPI for the Euro area will be out while the latest European Commission forecast updates will be released. For core CPI, consensus expects a +0.9% yoy print after holding at +1.0% yoy for the last 3 months (headline CPI 1.3% yoy expected). The final April services and composite PMIs in the UK will also be out in the morning. In the US preliminary Q1 nonfarm productivity and unit labour costs data are due, along with the March trade balance print, April ISM non-manufacturing, weekly initial jobless claims, March factory orders and the final March durable and capital goods orders data. Away from the data, the ECB’s Villeroy, Praet, Constancio and Coeure are due to speak.

US Event Calendar

  • 7:30am: Challenger Job Cuts YoY, prior 39.4%
  • 8:30am: Nonfarm Productivity, est. 0.9%, prior 0.0%; Unit Labor Costs, est. 3.0%, prior 2.5%
  • 8:30am: Initial Jobless Claims, est. 225,000, prior 209,000; Continuing Claims, est. 1.84m, prior 1.84m
  • 8:30am: Trade Balance, est. $50.0b deficit, prior $57.6b deficit
  • 9:45am: Bloomberg Consumer Comfort, prior 57.5
  • 9:45am: Markit US Services PMI, est. 54.5, prior 54.4; Markit US Composite PMI, prior 54.8
  • 10am: ISM Non-Manf. Composite, est. 58, prior 58.8
  • 10am: Durable Goods Orders, prior 2.6%; Durables Ex Transportation, prior 0.0%
  • 10am: Cap Goods Orders Nondef Ex Air, prior -0.1%; Cap Goods Ship Nondef Ex Air, prior -0.7%
  • 10am: Factory Orders, est. 1.4%, prior 1.2%; Factory Orders Ex Trans, prior 0.1%

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

After the football last night Jim is too emotionally drained to contribute today as Liverpool did their best to avoid making the final of the Champions League. However they just about got there and I think he’ll be busy dusting off his rolodex for clients in Kiev later today.

Unlike the football, it wasn’t quite so easy to get excited about last night’s Fed meeting but there were still one or two interesting statement changes to highlight. Our US economists believe that the statement moved incrementally in a more hawkish direction and also towards brevity. In their view, it recognized that inflation has moved close to and is expected to continue to run near the Committee’s 2% objective. As expected, it also emphasized that the 2% objective is a “symmetric” one, allowing for some overshoot as well as undershoot of inflation – a modestly dovish modification in their view. They also note that having just about reached the inflation objective, they dropped the need to continue monitoring inflation developments closely – a hawkish innovation.

Meanwhile, with inflation about on target and with risks to the Fed’s labour market objective running to the upside with the unemployment rate seen as low and the labour market expected to “remain strong”, one interesting point that our economists made in their note (link) yesterday was that they believe a change in the balance of risks language is coming, possibly as soon as June when the Chair will have an opportunity to explain things. In a nutshell our colleagues expect to learn from the minutes to this meeting, as well as upcoming Fedspeak, that should point to a more hawkish stance of policy at the June meeting, absent any unexpected events before then.

For markets, while moves were fairly modest, they did seem to interpret the statement as overall leaning very slightly more dovish. Perhaps that reflected the removal of the sentence “the economic outlook has strengthened in recent months” however we tend to agree with our economists in that this line was just removed simply as an acknowledgment of soft Q1 growth, which was widely anticipated. In any case, Treasury yields closed off their intraday highs with 2y yields finishing at 2.489% after trading as high as 2.517% while 10y yields ended broadly unchanged at 2.967% after being at 2.994%. The 2s10s curve finished at 48bps and nearly 2bps steeper on the day. It’s worth noting that June is 97% priced in for a hike now – which is little changed compared to the day prior.

The big mover in markets yesterday was the Greenback however. The Dollar index was initially strong leading into the Fed, however proceeded to fall -0.47% after the statement was released, but then rallied +0.66% off the lows into the close. EM currencies appeared to be on the receiving end of that with the Colombian Peso, Brazilian Real, Russian Ruble, Turkish Lira and Argentine Peso down between 1% and 3%. Some headlines about the US potentially increasing sanctions on Russia didn’t seem to help the Ruble weakness in particular. In any case the rally for the US Dollar did appear to weight on US equity markets with the S&P 500 and Dow both closing -0.72% despite Apple doing its best to lead markets higher post results.

This morning in Asia, market are broadly lower with the Hang Seng in particular down -1.66%, weighted down by tech and financials stocks, while the Nikkei (-0.16%), Kospi (-0.38%) and Shanghai Comp (-0.16%) have also trended lower. Ahead of today’s China/US trade talks today, Bloomberg cited unnamed Chinese government officials indicating that Beijing will not agree to preconditions that include abandoning its advanced manufacturing program and cut the trade gap by a fixed amount.

Moving on. While monetary policy came under review, there was also some focus on the fiscal side of things yesterday too with the US Treasury quarterly refunding announcement, however there were no great surprises with a $1bn increase to all maturities which was roughly in line with expectations, representing an additional $27bn of new issuance for the upcoming quarter.

Away from the Fed, earlier in the day the focus was on some of the data in Europe. Particularly in the spotlight was a first look at the Q1 GDP print for the Euro area however there were no real surprises with the +0.4% qoq/+2.5% yoy print coming in bang in line with expectations. The Q4 2017 reading was also revised up a tenth to +0.7% qoq. While Q1 was the slowest QoQ rate of growth in the Euro area since Q3 2016, it’s interesting to note that this is the first time ever that Europe has outpaced the UK for 5 consecutive quarters. Keep in mind that the UK outpaced Europe, with the exception of one flat quarter, for 15 quarters in a row between Q2 2011 and Q4 2014.

Meanwhile, just before that we had the final April manufacturing PMIs in Europe. The final Euro area reading was revised up 0.2pts from the flash estimate to 56.2. While that represents the fourth consecutive monthly decline, the rate of decline in April at just 0.4pts is a lot more moderate than the 1-2pt declines in the first 3 months of this year. The upward revision for April appeared to be due to a combination of a slightly stronger picture in France (+0.4pts to 53.8) and the noncore countries performing marginally better than implied. One exception was Italy which fell 1.6pts and more than expected to 53.5 (vs. 54.5 expected), marking a 15-month low. We should note that the new orders series for the Euro area fell 1pt albeit to a still solid 54.5 – but the lowest since November 2016. Italy’s new order series fell a more significant 3.2pts to 52.2 and is now down 9.1pts from the January high. So the fragility still appears to lie with Italy. European equity markets returned from Monday’s holiday in a positive mood with the Stoxx  600 finishing +0.63% and DAX closing at a fresh three-month high (+1.51%), albeit helped by a weaker Euro.

In other news, as far as the daily Brexit update is concerned, much of the focus was on the headlines from the night prior concerning the ‘rebellion’ being staged by Brexiteers in the cabinet over the customs union. Some reports suggested that Davis and Fox were willing to resign over May’s option preference for the union. Staying with the UK, it’s worth noting that there was rare good news to come from the construction PMI data which rose 5.5pts to 52.5 in April, with a big rise in housing activity the main driver. Sterling pared early gains by the close (-0.28%) as a result of broad Dollar strength however 10y Gilt yields were 5.2bps higher at 1.455%.

In terms of the remaining data, ahead of payrolls on Friday in the US the ADP moderated mom, but was above expectations at 204k (vs. 198k expected) and so remains solid at a three-month annualised rate of 224k. The  Eurozone’s March unemployment rate was steady and in-line at 8.5% while Italy was slightly higher than expected at 11.0% (vs. 10.9% expected).

Looking at the day ahead, the April CPI report and March PPI for the Euro area will be out while the latest European Commission forecast updates will be released. For core CPI, consensus expects a +0.9% yoy print after holding at +1.0% yoy for the last 3 months (headline CPI 1.3% yoy expected). The final April services and composite PMIs in the UK will also be out in the morning. In the US preliminary Q1 nonfarm productivity and unit labour costs data are due, along with the March trade balance print, April ISM non-manufacturing, weekly initial jobless claims, March factory orders and the final March durable and capital goods orders data. Away from the data, the ECB’s Villeroy, Praet, Constancio and Coeure are due to speak.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2I9GShb Tyler Durden

Morgan Stanley: “Tesla’s Call Was The Most Unusual I Have Experienced In 20 Years”

We were not the only ones who were left speechless by Thursday’s Tesla Tanturm: Elon Musk’s bizarre, childish, perhaps intoxicated meltdown during yesterday’s Tesla conference call, in which he interrupted analysts from Bernstein and RBC, cutting them off in the middle of the question for being “boneheaded, boring and dry” (when all they wanted was information on the company’s capex plans and Model 3 demand). This morning, the entire sellside appears to have joined in, to wit:

  • TESLA INVESTORS SAY ODD EARNINGS CALL ’SHOOK CONFIDENCE’: RBC
  • TESLA LIKELY TO FALL TODAY AFTER ‘TRULY BIZARRE’ CALL: JPMORGAN
  • TESLA REITERATED SELL AT GOLDMAN ON LIKELY MISSED TARGETS

But the best reaction of all came from Morgan Stanley’s traditional Tesla fanboy, Adam Jonas: not even he could ignore the fast-motion carwreck (with or without an autopilot) that Musk unveiled 37 minutes into the call.

His rather shocked note on “The Importance of “Boring Questions” out this morning at 1:29am GMT…

… is below. Enjoy:

Tesla’s 1Q18 analyst conference call was arguably the most unusual call I have experienced in 20 years on the sell- side.  Many investors we spoke with post the call agree.

The first half of the Q&A was dominated by analyst questions about manufacturing, automation, cost, efficiency, and capital… a few other questions covered recent management departures and reservation momentum. We asked about the scope of collaboration between Tesla and SpaceX on data, to which Mr. Musk said “there are many areas for us to collaborate… haven’t really thought about it.” A surprising answer from someone who launched a Tesla Roadster into outer space on a SpaceX rocket.

The call made an odd turn ~37 minutes in when Elon criticized an analyst for asking a ‘boring’ question about capital requirements and then interrupted the following question (about Model 3 order configuration), saying “We’re going to go to YouTube. Sorry. These questions are so dry. They’re killing me.” He proceeded to take a 23 minute series of questions from a blogger. While the consequences are unquantifiable, we believe Tesla’s CEO made a mistake in refusing to answer some of the analyst questions about the Model 3 ramp. Additionally, we found the posture out of character with the normally inviting, enlightening tone of prior conference calls over many years. While they may be ‘dry’ in nature, we argue such questions are extremely important for a highly levered and cash hungry company with 2025 bonds trading at 89. As we have highlighted in our previous research, even the short-term cadence of Model 3 production can significantly impact cash levels, liquidity, and financial credit worthiness. This is due to the interplay of fixed cost absorption and negative working capital. In our view, more than any other factor, the path of the Model 3 can determine whether the stock could test our $561 bull case or fall below our $175 bear case.

To be clear. Tonight’s conference call didn’t go very well. Feedback we have received from investors during and following the call support this view. Irrespective of the Tesla CEO’s annoyance with the genre of questions he was receiving from the analyst community, we note that an important part of Tesla’s success has been its relationship with the capital markets in funding its ambitious plans. The analysts on the call represent the providers of capital that Tesla has throughout its history depended upon.

Well, when Tesla’s access to capital markets is finally cut off in a few quarters, there is always the Teslacoin ICO…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2FG8ips Tyler Durden

Blain: “Apple Becomes Dull, Boring And Predictable – And It’s A Good Thing”

Submitted by Bill Blain of Mint Partners

Apple becomes Dull, Boring and Predictable – and its a good thing. Picking Tech winners and losers is a game of common sense!

“It’s a bitch girl but it’s gone too far ‘cause you know it don’t matter anyway..“

After keeping rates on hold, a Fed hike in June is nailed on. Inflation is on/near target – but the unspoken consensus was no pressure to go early. Dollar stays high. Stocks down a bit. 10-year bonds at 2.97. Yawn.

In Europe mildly disappointing data leaves the ECB without any pressing need to act. The UK government looks riven, undecided and looking for straws to clutch over Customs and Brexit – no change there then. In short… same as, same as… None of it really matters nor will be remembered in a few years/months/weeks/days.

Meanwhile… back in the real world, where stuff is interesting..

“I’m sorry I criticised you, Apple. You win”, was the headline on an interesting Bloomberg opinion piece yesterday. The author went on to say: “Tim Cook’s company is a rock of common sense in an industry that’s gone rogue.” He called it the “perfect tech company, an example to the rest of Silicon valley”. Critically the article concluded “Apple exemplifies what economists describe as the maturity of the information technology revolution. It shows that a stage of useful progress is over…”

I wonder what Steve Jobs would think of the company he so personified becoming a stand-up mature company – but we’ll never know… A very good friend of mine, who just happens to be a senior Apple exec here in the UK, took me to task y’day for my comments about the lack of innovation: “they’s been saying that about Apple for a decade and our stock as quadrupled. I remember the analysts crying out “if Apple doesn’t produce a Netbook, it’s dead in the water.”” I can’t even remember what an Netbook was..

I never thought I’d give Apple a gold star for being Dull, Boring and Predictable, but that’s what it’s become.

There are lessons to be learnt from that realization.

With the assistance of Martin Malone, my Macro Economist, we took a look at Apple and the other tech giants over the past 10-yrs. Apple is clearly a mature company – those of us old enough will remember the classic breakthrough Advert from 1984! One of the great cameo moments in Forrest Gump (1994) is Tom Hanks receiving his stock statement from Apple and telling Jenny he’d invested in a fruit company…! Apple was worth $140 bln in 2008 – today its worth $870 bln.

It’s much the same thing for the rest of the FAAAT names (I’m patenting that!) in terms of market capitalisation:

                                    2008                            2018                Annualised Growth

Facebook                     $20 bln (est)                $500 bln          38%

Amazon                       $25 bln                        $770 bln          41%

Apple                          $140 bln                      $870 bln          20%

Alibaba                        $20 bln (est)                $460 bln          37%

Tencent                       $20 bln                        $470 bln          37%

 

During the same 10-years, the rest of the S&P produced 7% annual returns. Even the other top 10 names, like JPM, Berkshire and J&J were in single digits. New Tech has been the clear winner.

Past performance in no guide to the future, but so much expected growth is tied to digitisation technologies – whether that’s the destruction and reinvention of the high street, new travel modes, medical, educational, computing – you name it and there will be something new. (I tried that and said: “Coal”. Nope.. new Clean Coal tech makes it much more interesting!)

Not a single sector is exempt from new tech solutions and ways of doing it better/cheaper/cleaner. Even the oldest profession is under threat from robotics – or so I’m reliably informed!

Of course, not every Tech marvel is going to succeed.

Leading us neatly to Tesla. While the papers all express incredulity at Elon Musk’s refusal to answer boring questions – like: how does the order book translate to paid-for cars? – it’s credibility that’s on the line. Give Musk as gold star for elevating Electric Vehicles to the forefront of the consumer want list and creating a new market. Don’t even worry about how close to production targets Tesla might get. But be very, very concerned about how fast its burning through its cash pile – $1.1 bln in the last quarter!

According to the WSJ, Telsa’s remaining cash position of $2.7 bln will barely cover debt payments and long-term capital leases through the year. It could avoid a new capital raise, but only if it delivers way more cars than expected. (Instead, Must skipped that question – and falling short of target is always the case at Tesla.) A normal prudent firm would raise capital now, when it still can – but Musk says he won’t because he doesn’t need to. (Blain’s Mantra No 7 is raise capital when you can, not when you have to!)

And then there is We Work – the darling office-share company. Valued around $20bln, its just sold a $702 mm bond – which has crashed nearly 5 points in the few days since launch. Even by the standards of the speculative Hi-yield market, that’s a stunning slap in the face with a wet haddock. We Work’s business sounds great – give the rising tide of self-employed and start-ups access to great social offices and foster the millennial vibe. But any banker will tell you that holding long-term leases and renting them out by the month is the equivalent of borrowing long and lending short – a pretty sure fire route to collapse! Sometime in the near future, We Work is planning an IPO. You have been warned…

Some tech/disruption ideas are brilliant, innovative and work. Other great ideas just don’t work as well, if at all. Anyone for a perpetual motion machine startup I met y’day…?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Ih33Su Tyler Durden

Russian Su-30 Jet Crashes Off Syria Coast, Both Pilots Dead

A Russian Su-30SM fighter jet crashed off the Syria coast, killing two pilots on board, the Russian Defense Ministry confirmed. 

The plane crashed over the Mediterranean Sea on Thursday morning, shortly after it took off from the Hmeymim airbase in Syria, the ministry added.  Pilots “fought to take the aircraft under control till the last minute,” the Russian Defense ministry said. Both pilots died as the result of the incident.

A Russian Su-30SM fighter plane crashed over the Mediterranean Sea at around 9:45 a.m. Moscow time [06:45 GMT] when gaining height after taking off from the Hmeymim airfield. Both pilots, which were fighting to save the plane until the last moment, died,” the statement read.

The crash may have been caused by a bird hitting the engine, the ministry said, citing preliminary data. The aircraft was not shot down.

The last similar incident occurred in March, when a Russian An-26 military transport aircraft crashed during landing at Hmeymim airfield, killing the 33 passengers and six crew members on board.

As a reminder, Russian military aircraft have been stationed in Syria as part of a deal between Moscow and Damascus. In 2017, Russian and Syrian authorities agreed to prolong their presence in the country after President Vladimir Putin ordered the withdrawal of a significant number of troops from Syria. Khmeimim Airbase near Latakia and the naval site in the port city of Tartus have been handed over to Russia for 49 years with an option of automatic extension.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2HSm1M9 Tyler Durden

Are Russian Bonds Toxic Waste Or Golden Eggs?

Authored by Tom Luongo,

One man’s toxic waste is another man’s golden goose.  A new round of economic sanctions imposed on Russia last month by the U.S. is creating havoc in investment circles.  A recent article by Ben Aris at Russia Insider describes Russian debt assets as ‘toxic waste again.’

That doesn’t mean these Russian debt assets actually are bad investments, just that those who currently hold them have to get rid of them because the rules have changed.

And they are no longer legally allowed to own them.

Because of that what were one minute the darling of the investment world instantly turned into garbage, selling if anyone can find a buyer at discounts even Crazy Eddie would blanche at.

All the previous sanctions imposed on Russian companies had only affected new securities – listings of new shares or bonds. Existing securities were unaffected.

Not now. The Specially Designated Nationals And Blocked Persons List (SDN List) released on April 6 not only sanctions those listed, it bans any investor with US exposure (European banks with US branches count) from doing any business with the sanctioned names. Investors were supposed sell all their stocks, bonds and debt within 30 days – i.e. before May 7.

This has sent the market for Russian securities into the floor.

Criminal Idiocracy

Politicians are a stupid and cowardly lot. Batman had it right, because they are, in fact, criminals.

For their own purposes they pass laws which force losses onto those who did nothing wrong, in this case those who purchased Russian corporate and sovereign debt in European markets over the past few years.

It’s theft, pure and simple.  Those having to sell these securities to get into compliance will face horrific losses, 70 to 80 cents on the dollar, in some cases.

Overnight, a healthy and prosperous market became a desert of the real all because John McCain’s nose was out of joint over being outmaneuvered in Crimea a few years ago?

And Donald Trump is too cowardly to say no to this insanity?

If I was a truly cynical man I would venture that ex-Goldmanite Steve Mnuchin engineered this so his buddies could play Johnny Bench at their bond desks in Hong Kong picking these things up for pennies. That would be crude wouldn’t it?

Crude but certainly plausible.

Russia is harmed by this.  Coupon payments have to be made in the currency of the debt.  The push here thanks to these sanctions is to limit Russian companies’ access to euros, in the same way that crashing the ruble and oil markets in 2014 was designed to starve Russia of dollars, forcing the bonds to be settled as they mature versus being rolled over because the companies had lost access to U.S. dollar funding.

Since that time the Russians have switched to euros, Chinese yuan and rubles.  But, with the bank of Russia keeping interest rates too high, there is little appetite for issuing ruble-denominated debt, when the euro markets offer far better rates.

This is the same thinking that trapped Russian corporates in 2014.  Blame can be laid at the feet of both parties, the companies looking for the lowest cost of capital and the central bank slow-playing the recovery of the Russian economy through overly-high interest rates.

It is a situation like this that fuels the notions that the Bank of Russia still works for the West rather than Russia herself.  Personally, I’ve been screaming at BoR President Elvira Nabullina to lower borrowing rates faster for more than a year now.

While both consumer and business lending are growing finally, the BoR is still encouraging Russian companies to seek out loans denominated in anything other than Rubles at a time when the avowed policy of the Russian government is to de-dollarize as much as possible.

In other words, the high interest rate policy is encouraging the very behavior the BoR says it is trying to fight, by inviting foreign capital into Russia only to see it fly out in the event of a new attack by the U.S. on its banking system.

Foreign ownership of Russian bonds is now 30% versus just 5% at the start of the year, thanks to high interest rate arbitrage.

Such that now there is more than $176 billion dollars in euro-denominated debt which has to be serviced.

These bonds have to be sold to new investors, harming them, which Mnuchin, Trump and the rest of the bozos in Washington could care less about.

Next Stop: City of London

Then the next step will be to cut Russian companies out of the European banking system.  The Gypsum Lady, U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May, has all but made that threat in the wake of Skripal-Gate, but it has not been revisited.

It’s likely because she knows she can’t do that until the markets for Russian securities are clear and London bond traders have figured things out.  Even Mnuchin, as Mr. Aris, pointed out, had to back off to allow the market time to get in compliance.

In March, the ECB seized Latvian Bank ABLV to remove an avenue in which Russian businesses can bank within the EU.  Again, so much of this is about getting Russia and Gazprom to stop building the Nordstream 2 pipeline as well as repudiate its relationship with Iran.

But, it simply won’t work.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and his chief economic advisor Sergei Glazyev have been pounding their shoes on the table to get the ‘oligarchs’ to repatriate their funds and bring their core business practices back to Russia.

The West cannot be trusted.  Glazyev, in particular, has been adamant about this to stop the capital flight out of Russia through the banking system.

So, in effect, the U.S. is doing exactly what Putin wants done, bring the capital home.  He’ll give them tax breaks, similar to what Trump did for U.S. corporates in his tax bill.

Between making ownership of the bonds illegal it also puts upward pressure on the ruble in forex markets as companies now have to scramble to raise euros to service the debt.

It’s a mess. But, it’s a mess that can be handled because Russia isn’t alone in the world anymore.  Today, unlike late 2014, it has a much better and deeper relationship with China to get the right currency into the right hands at the right time.

It was the opening up of ruble/yuan swap lines in December 2014 that stabilized the Russian equity markets and ensured that the worst of the ruble crisis was over.  Today, with a similar market dislocation attempt by the U.S. the ruble has pushed up a few points, but nothing potentially catastrophic.

The Rush to Nowhere

The urgency with which all of these false flags, hybrid and physical war actions, etc. that the U.S., the U.K., Israel and Saudi Arabia are occurring tells me that time is running out to stick this landing and get the desired result – regime change in Iran and Russian submission to U.S. hegemony.

The problem with tactics like this is simply that if they don’t work, if the target doesn’t collapse then you’ve got nothing left to him them with. And, like Ali versus George Foreman, the counter-attack will be a knockout.

The bottom line is that because Russia is in such a good financial position — low Debt to GDP, growing albeit slowly economy, buoyant oil and natural gas prices, more than ample foreign exchange reserves — investors are lined up deep to get access to their markets and their assets.

In markets, it’s a verity that a big actor can manipulate price in the short term, think stock buybacks for example, but they cannot overwhelm the primary trend.  A decade of QE can’t raise the price of worthless mortgage-backed securities.

If you believe that’s possible then you don’t believe in the power of markets, the power of people acting in the aggregate over the actions of the very few acting in concert.

The demand for Russian assets was there in 2017.  Despite the best laid plans of Washington and Downing St. that demand is still there and it will ensure that Russia will not be locked out of capital markets in the future.

Dollar and euro markets are gone.  They will figure something out with China.  People are clever.  Russians especially so.  They will always find a way to get around the diktats of a would-be Emperor.

N.B. – Thanks to Trauma2000 at the Russia Insider forums for spurring me to answer Mr.Aris’ article.

*  *  *

To support work like this as well as find out ways to crisis-proof your portfolio in times of geopolitical unrest, join my Patreon and subscribe to the Gold Goats ‘n Guns Investment Newsletter for just $12/month.  

via RSS https://ift.tt/2jp14Ob Tyler Durden

Global Military Spending Notches Up

The end of the Cold War didn’t usher in world peace and countries keep spending on militaries and arms.

As Staista’s Dyfed Loesche reports, the newest data released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) shows governments around the world spent an estimated $1.7 trillion in 2017, which is the highest level since the end of the Cold War.

Infographic: Global Military Spending Notches Up | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

After 13 years of increases from 1999 to 2011 and relatively unchanged spending from 2012 to 2016, total worldwide expenditure only rose marginally in 2017, by 1.1 percent in real terms.

SIPRI pulls together data from 172 countries and military spending is not to be confused with arms purchases. The figures include government spending on military forces and activities, which are made up of salaries and benefits, operational expenses, arms and equipment purchases, military construction, research and development, and central administration, command and support.

The SIPRI fact sheet can be downloaded here.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2FEcSom Tyler Durden