Uruguay's President Signs Bill Legalizing Marijuana

Uruguay
officially
became
the first country to legalize marijuana on Monday night,
when President Jose Mujica quietly signed a bill
passed
by the legislature two weeks ago. Regulators have until
April 9 to write the rules for the new distribution system, which
will include sales at pharmacies (up to 40 grams a month per
consumer) and joint cultivation by nonprofit cannabis clubs. But as
of Tuesday, it is legal for each household to grow up to six plants
and harvest up to 480 grams (a bit more than a pound) annually.

While Uruguay is the first nation-state to legalize marijuana
for general use, two U.S. states, Colorado and Washington, beat it
by a year. Each is larger in population and territory than the
small South American country, which covers 68,000 square miles and
is home to 3.3 million people. Between them Colorado and Washington
cover 175,000 square miles, with a total population of about 12
million. The world’s first government-licensed recreational pot
stores
will open
next Wednesday in Colorado.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/26/uruguays-president-signs-bill-legalizing
via IFTTT

Uruguay’s President Signs Bill Legalizing Marijuana

Uruguay
officially
became
the first country to legalize marijuana on Monday night,
when President Jose Mujica quietly signed a bill
passed
by the legislature two weeks ago. Regulators have until
April 9 to write the rules for the new distribution system, which
will include sales at pharmacies (up to 40 grams a month per
consumer) and joint cultivation by nonprofit cannabis clubs. But as
of Tuesday, it is legal for each household to grow up to six plants
and harvest up to 480 grams (a bit more than a pound) annually.

While Uruguay is the first nation-state to legalize marijuana
for general use, two U.S. states, Colorado and Washington, beat it
by a year. Each is larger in population and territory than the
small South American country, which covers 68,000 square miles and
is home to 3.3 million people. Between them Colorado and Washington
cover 175,000 square miles, with a total population of about 12
million. The world’s first government-licensed recreational pot
stores
will open
next Wednesday in Colorado.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/26/uruguays-president-signs-bill-legalizing
via IFTTT

Itemizing The Obamacare Fees

Obamacare’s rollout may be in limbo even though the official deadline has come and gone (despite a much touted 2 million visitors to healthcare.gov on Monday which probably means it should IPO immediately), but the real sticker shock of actual fees awaits. And even as most insurers are opting to keep the full impact of the higher cost hidden, instead adding them to the overhead premiums charged, one company, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, has itemized the impact of the Unaffordable Care Act by adding a separate line itme for the “Affordable Care Act Fees and Taxes.” Here is how these add up according to a breakdown conducted by the Post.

The new taxes on one customer’s bill added up to $23.14 a month, or $277.68 annually, according to Kaiser Health News. It boosted the monthly premium from $322.26 to $345.40 for that individual.

 

The new taxes and fees include a 2 percent levy on every health plan, which is expected to net about $8 billion for the government in 2014 and increase to $14.3 billion in 2018.

 

There’s also a $2 fee per policy that goes into a new medical-research trust fund called the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

 

Americans also will pay hidden taxes, such as the 2.3 percent medical-device tax that will inflate the cost of items such as pacemakers, stents and prosthetic limbs.

 

Those with high out-of-pocket medical expenses also will get smaller income-tax deductions.

 

Americans are currently allowed to deduct expenses that exceed 7.5 percent of their annual income. The threshold jumps to 10 percent under ObamaCare, costing taxpayers about $15 billion over 10 years.

Then there is the new Medicare tax:

Under ObamaCare, individual tax filers earning more than $200,000 and families earning more than $250,000 will pay an added 0.9 percent Medicare surtax on top of the existing 1.45 percent Medicare payroll tax. They’ll also pay an extra 3.8 percent Medicare tax on unearned income, such as investment dividends, rental income and capital gains.

So will a big story for 2014 be Americans taking out student loans, already over $1 trillion and more than all US credit card debt, to pay for their health insurance? We hope to find out soon as the biggest capital misallocation in US history continues.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/VvfRjocM3k0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Albert Einstein: “A Foolish Faith In Authority Is The Worst Enemy Of The Truth”

 

Albert Einstein said:

A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of the truth.

Indeed, scientists have shown that people will go to absurd lengths – and engage in mental gymnastics – in order to cling to their belief in what those in authority have said.

Part of the reason so many are so vulnerable to naive belief in authority is that we evolved in small tribes … and we assume that the super-elites are just like us.

In reality, there are millions of psychopaths in the world … and they are largely running D.C. and on Wall Street.

These people have no hesitation in lying to promote their goals.

The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs told Morley Safer of 60 Minutes and CBS News:

Look, if you think any American official is going to tell you the truth, then you’re stupid. Did you hear that? — stupid.

And studies show that the super-rich lie, cheat and steal more than the rest of us.

Who’s to Blame … Big Government or Big Business?

Conservatives tend to believe that the captains of industry are virtuous and that the government can’t be trusted.

Liberals tend to believe that government servants are virtuous and that corporations can’t be trusted.

But the truth is that psychopaths are psychopaths … whether they’re in the private sector or government.

And there is no such thing as representative government or free market capitalism anymore. Big corporate money has coopted the government; and ill-guided politicians have destroyed the free market.

Corrupt government agencies and officials and corrupt corporations and executives have become intertwined in a malignant, symbiotic relationship.

And they’re trying to grab more and more power and wealth every day.

Big Business Has Turned Into a Criminal Syndicate

Big banks and giant oil companies have more or less become criminal enterprises.

And conservatives are not amused.

Government Has Gone Rogue

If the government were accountable, then government corruption, deceit and wrongdoing would be held to a modest level.

But the government is not accountable.

When bad government policy leads to bad results, the government manipulates the data … instead of changing policy.

Government pumps out massive amounts of propaganda through the mainstream and “gatekeeper” alternative media, movies, video games, and other venues.

The government has launched a war on journalism, and censors and manipulates social media. And see this.

The massive NSA is spying on all of us – including government officials, reporters, and everyone else – as a way to crush dissent.

And people who criticize government policy or government officials may literally be labeled terrorists.

No wonder the American public has lost faith in the 2 party system. And see this.

People of faith shouldn’t be fooled into blindly deferring to government authority.

Bonus:


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/G3AwDBbM4Hc/story01.htm George Washington

French Hope Dashed As Joblessness Surges Back Towards Record High

For the second time in 6 months, French joblessness has re-surged back towards record highs, dashing the hopes and dreams of a European recovery. The first time it was thousands of texts that didn’t get sent that implied joblessness dropped, this time, no excuse and we push back to within 2k of the all-time high unemployment in France. As Germany heads inexorably in the other direction, one can only hope the French President does not decide to take matters into his own hands and ‘draft’ the youth into employment.

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/FTxAGS2g-3U/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Jacob Sullum on the 5 Best Drug Scares of 2013

Drug policy and rationality go
together like hot fudge and anchovies, says Senior Editor Jacob
Sullum. From marijuana to Salvia divinorum, from cocaine
to “bath salts,” from absinthe to Four Loko, panic precipitates and
perpetuates prohibition as activists, politicians, and yellow
journalists conspire to keep the American public alarmed about the
psychoactive substances other people are consuming. Sullum picks
five examples from the last year.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/26/jacob-sullum-on-the-5-best-drug-scares-o
via IFTTT

This Is Not The European Recovery You Were Looking For

As US and European stocks glide effortlessly higher, even the most ardent of US bulls has begun to realize things are getting out of hand. In order to keep his AUM flowing (and afford the next yacht), the friendly local asset gatherer will offer insights like… “there is value overseas” or “Europe is cheap” in hopes that his audience is none the wise as to the true state of affairs elsewhere in the world, let alone in the US. The truth, the gap between US and European earnings has never been wider and with 3 (or 4) false dawns already, European earnings (supposedly the true mother’s milk of the stock market) continue to fall – as the strong ‘whatever-it-takes’ EUR does nothing but stymie their recovery.

 

 

S&P 500 earnings are 14% above their 2007 peak while euro-area profits are 53% below their all-time high in March 2008 (of course, this is not firm EBITDA but earnings per share – which is a mirage of low-credit-cost buyback-driven float shrink in some nations of the world… but still)


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/rDGRm3YLSY0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Gold and Silver Sentiments Violently Diverged in 2013

by Keith Weiner

 

There are two reasons why people buy gold and silver. The first is that they’re the monetary metals. Many people don’t want more than a certain exposure to the risks of the banking system. They hold dollars for liquidity and beyond that exchange them for metallic money. This money is not for trading.

The second is to trade or, more specifically, to speculate. They buy with the expectation of a rising price. The gold price, measured in dollars, is really just the inverse of the dollar price measured in gold. As the Fed abuses its credit, the quality of its liability falls. This liability—the dollar—has been falling in quality and price for 100 years. Measured in gold, the dollar is now just under 26mg. Or, measured in silver, it’s around 1.6 grams. Most people look at the inverse, the dollar prices of the metals, currently around $1200 and $19.50.

It makes for a great speculation, that the dollar will continue to fall. At least, it did until 2011. The gold price peaked in 2011 at $1900, and has since dropped 37%. The silver price dropped 60%.

One speculation strategy is to buy when something is going up. Today, there is clearly no upward momentum in gold and silver. The other approach is to try to buy when there’s blood in the streets, as the old trader’s saying goes. OK, but is there blood in the gold and silver streets?

I write the Monetary Metals Supply and Demand Report, a free weekly letter that provides data and analysis of the constantly changing fundamentals of the gold and silver markets. The data shows that gold is significantly scarcer to the market than silver; gold has a small backwardation and silver does not.

For months, I have discussed my hunch that there just has not been the final capitulation in silver as in gold. I have seen the comments on my own and other articles, and in other online forums.

I couldn’t prove it, but it kept nagging at me. Then I put together this graph of inventory held in the two big Exchange Traded Funds: GLD and SLV.

 

Tonnes of Metal Held by the ETFs, Jan 2009 through Dec 2013
GLD and SLV tonnes of metal

The picture in gold is what you’d expect. Gold metal begins to move out of the GLD inventories around the start of this year, and it has been almost a straight move down. There is no sign yet of a bottom. Gold inventory is down 40% from its peak one year ago.

Silver violently diverged. As one might expect, silver held by SLV peaked on April 25, 2011, the day the price peaked. Metal began moving out of the ETF the next day. The level quickly dropped by 14%, but then stopped falling. Then, at the end of 2012, inventory began to rise. Though the silver price is down 60%, silver holdings are down only 9%.

The reason for metal to flow in or out of an ETF is counterintuitive. It has nothing to do with price moves. The flow of metal depends entirely on the spread between the prices of the ETF and the metal itself. Arbitrageurs buy metal and sell new shares, whenever the share price is above the metal price. They sell metal and buy back shares when the share price is lower.

The graph shows a one-way flow of gold out of GLD. This means that the price of GLD shares has consistently sagged below the price of gold. This corresponds to negative sentiment regarding this metal. By contrast, more metal has flowing into SLV than out.

In general, I caution against just this sort of analysis. It is easy to focus on a highly visible corner of the market and ignore numerous low-profile corners. Both gold and silver have vast inventories; there is no such thing as a
shortage or a glut. Metal can move from one corner to the other without necessarily impacting price or anything else.

But in this case, the reason to study this chart is to understand sentiment among speculators. I suggest that sentiment in silver has not made its nadir, and that silver speculators yet cling to hope against hope that its price will shoot to the moon.

The irony is that my statement is controversial and contra the accepted wisdom in the silver community. If speculators had turned truly pessimistic about silver, then my statement would be uncontroversial, but advising people to buy silver would spark controversy.

One can never be certain about sentiment changes, but it’s a strong possibility that silver speculator pessimism rises to match that in gold. If this happens, the silver price could drop several more dollars. This is a time to be cautious with silver, though I never advise naked shorting a monetary metal.

 

(C) 2013 Monetary Metals


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/e_r849xUEEk/story01.htm Monetary Metals

Utah Gets Ready To Do Without the Feds

Federal land fault lineSometimes, I suspect that a
century from now, representatives of the government of the rump
remains of the United States of America will go to Salt Lake City
to beg the Republic of Deseret for kinder terms on a loan to fund
the continuing U.S. war on anything innovative or profitable. The
American representatives will have to order chips and salsa before
they’ll be served the 3.2 beer in which they’ll drown their sorrows
over the progress of the negotiations. Their hosts will drive a
hard bargain, still nursing resentment over long-gone dominance by
D.C. Utah is already establishing the grounds for that future
meeting. Like most westerners, Utahns are
pissed
about
federal control of land
and purse strings. Unlike most, though,
they seem serious about reshaping that relationship.

In 2012, Utah passed the
Transfer of Public Lands Act
, essentially demanding that the
federal government surrender the two-thirds of the state controlled
by Washington, D.C.
Other western states
are considering
similar measures
, but Utah paved the way.

But Utah is preparing to go a step further and plans for a
future that isn’t funded by federal largesse. The state passed a
series of bills as part of a Financial Ready Utah movement. The
problem, as the group backing the move
explains
, is that “More than 40 cents of every dollar the state
of Utah spends comes from the federal government that borrows
and/orprints more than 40 cents of every dollar it sends to Utah.”
Since “The current fiscal trajectory of the federal government is
unsustainable,” (a point agreed to by the
Congressional Budget Office
), Utahns foresee a day when
whatever they want done will have to be paid by local funds.

Recently, Reason Foundation Director of Government Reform
Leonard Gilroy interviewed
Utah State Representative Ken Ivory
, who plays a key role in
increasing his state’s autonomy. Ivory links his role in taking
local control of public land in the state to the state’s need for
increased financial self-reliance. Said Ivory:

In the 2011 session—when we realized that over $5 billion of our
state revenue comes from a federal government that’s broke—that’s
when we started to flesh out how serious those numbers were.
Something on the order of 40% of our state revenue comes from an
unsustainable source in our federal governing partner. We looked at
the magnitude of this risk and started to think about how we could
broaden our revenue base and get to a point of economic
self-reliance.

You’re not going to close a revenue gap in the billions of
dollars by tweaking the tax code with minor adjustments; you’d have
to more than double the income tax and kill the economy. You’d have
to increase corporate taxes by more than 1000%, again, killing the
economy in an attempt to close that gap. On top of the general
fiscal gap, in Utah we are $2.6 billion below average in annual
per-pupil funding. There’s no amount of nipping, tucking and
tweaking in the tax code that even closes decimals on that gap. The
magnitude is tremendous.

Yet, what we know from the U.S. Government Accountability Office
is that there’s more recoverable oil in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming
than the rest of the world combined. There’s a study from earlier
this year by the Institute for Energy Research that there’s $150
trillion in mineral value locked up in the federally controlled
lands throughout the West. Right now the forests—which were a
renewable resource, with the revenue funding schools, roads and
public safety—have been shut down to timber harvesting, and now
they’re basically tinder boxes. We’ve got so much dead wood
standing in the forests that, in fact, the FBI is even warning our
state foresters that terrorists are encouraging wildfires as a form
of jihad. The forests are so dense now that the trees can’t defend
themselves and fend off natural diseases and pests, so forests
throughout the West are largely dead or dying just waiting for any
spark to ignite the next catastrophic wildfire.

So we looked at these conditions. And as you pointed out, more
than 50% of all land in the western United States is owned and
controlled by the federal government. This is in a nation that was
founded on the principles of inherent, inalienable rights to life,
liberty and property. World-renowned economist John Kenneth
Galbraith made a statement in the mid-1980s that “where the
socialized ownership of land is concerned, only the U.S.S.R. and
China can claim company with the United States.”

Ivory says the enabling acts authorizing statehood for western
states, including Utah,
contain the same language about transfer of public lands
from
the federal government to state authorities as the enabling acts
for states such as Nebraska. But the transfers took place for
Nebraska and other states, and not for their counterparts further
west. That’s the lynchpin for the drive to take control of lands
that are now claimed by the federal government, and to gain the
financial benefits from them.

That’s not a universally accepted legal interpretation of the
enabling acts, but there’s no doubt that federal dominance
economically hobbles the western states. There’s also no doubt that
greater financial independence would allow for more policy
variation and experimentation at the state level—especially in a
region that is rather ideologically
distinct from the East
. It would also help to insulate states
from the ongoing fiscal disaster in Washington, D.C.

Read the rest of the very interesting interview here.
And don’t miss Jesse
Walker’s take
on how immigration from California has made Idaho
more conservative.

By the way, as much as I respect Utah’s foresight, I’m hoping
that Arizonans get to watch that future meeting in Salt Lake City
from the disinterested—in either party—sidelines.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/26/utah-gets-ready-to-do-without-the-feds
via IFTTT

This Christmas, Edward Snowden Wants the World to Rediscover the Gift of Privacy

England’s Channel 4 offers up an alternative to the Queen’s
Christmas message every December. This year, the channel passed
along a message from National Security Agency whistleblower

Edward Snowden
, recorded in Russia:

An important section for those who can’t watch the video:

“A child born today will grow up with no expectation of privacy
at all. They’ll never know what it means to have a private moment
to themselves – an unrecorded, unanalyzed thought. And that’s
important because privacy matters. Privacy is what allows us to
determine who we are and who we want to be. The conversation
occurring today will determine the amount of trust we can place
both in the technology that surrounds us and the government that
regulates it. Together we can find a better balance, end mass
surveillance, and remind the government that if it really wants to
know how we feel, asking is always cheaper than spying.”

A couple of thoughts come to mind listening to this:

  • There needs to be more work making a better case for privacy.
    It’s excellent that a millennial like Snowden has become the face
    of this fight, given that his generation has become famous for
    sharing everything it does online. Don’t treat this as a criticism
    of social media – in general, being able to share so much more of
    our lives across great distances has made communicating so much
    easier and effective. But Snowden’s statement about why privacy
    matters lacks punch. It feels unfinished. How does government data
    collection affect our ability to determine who we are and who we
    want to be?
  • There is still little or no significant cultural push beyond
    the strongest privacy and security advocates or activists for any
    sort of consequences for this systemic, entrenched breach of the
    public trust. The
    chorus
    calling for consequences (either termination or
    prosecution – or both) for Director of National Intelligence head
    James Clapper for lying to Congress under oath about the extent of
    the federal collection of Americans’ data is still small. The
    National Security Agency still feels comfortable appearing on
    60 Minutes to
    mislead
    the public about what it is doing. And the media
    obviously doesn’t feel enough public pressure yet to resist
    allowing surveillance supporters from invoking terrorism threats an
    9/11 as a
    defense
    , despite the lack of evidence this data collection has
    helped at all.

Will privacy become an election issue in 2014 or will Obamacare
overwhelm all arguments? Do we have to wait for the next
presidential election to really have this fight? (Or will there
even be an actual fight?)

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/26/this-christmas-edward-snowden-wants-the
via IFTTT