“Workarounds” Galore: How Real Americans Deal With “Real” Inflation

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

It’s the list of workarounds – always growing, never shrinking – that’s telling us the true story of inflation in America.

Today I’m publishing a guest post by writer Bill Rice, Jr., on “real inflation,”which as everyone knows far exceeds the “official” inflation rate of 2%. Bill and I corresponded earlier this year when he was researching and writing his recent article What Does Your Toilet Paper Have to Do With Inflation? Manufacturers have been engaging in “shrinkflation,” leaving consumers paying more for less, but stealthily. (The American Conservative magazine)

Bill’s extensive list of links (50 Dots…) follows his essay. Thank you, Bill, for sharing your insightful research with Of Two Minds readers.

‘Workarounds’ galore: How real Americans deal with ‘real’ inflation By Bill Rice, Jr.

While working on a story on inflation and shrinkflation, I quickly zeroed in on the concept of “workarounds” as an alternative, perhaps superior, way to gauge the true state of our economy. I define workarounds as the changes individuals or families (or businesses) must make in their daily living to adapt to a world of rising prices. If nothing else, these examples, taken in the aggregate, challenge the conventional wisdom that inflation is “low” or “contained,” or that the economy is just fine, thank you.

As decades have passed, the list of workarounds families have utilized to deal with rising prices has rapidly grown.

Women and mothers entering the workforce in massive numbers – the disappearance of families where one income was sufficient to maintain a “constant standard of living” – might be the earliest and most important workaround on my list. Other trends from this expanding list include:

Shoppers switching to less expensive store or private-label brands, families “substituting” hamburger or chicken for steak, buying from “value” menus, couponing, shopping at discount or “dollar” stores more often, buying in bulk to get the lowest unit-cost (think Costco), buying more items at yard sales or from Internet swap meets, “cutting the cord,” cancelling the land line, getting fewer haircuts per year, taking clothes to the dry cleaners less often, cutting out the maid service or paying for it fewer times each month, attending sporting events less often (here, here, here and here), going to the movies less frequently, playing golf or hunting less frequently, dropping out of country clubs and civic clubs, going to the dentist less often, cancelling newspaper and magazine subscriptions …

Cremation instead of burial, casual instead of (more expensive) “business” attire, eliminating or “rationing” prescription medications, moving from high cost-of-living states (or cities) to lower-cost-of-living communities, adult children moving back in with their parents (and aging adults moving in with their grown children), car-pooling and now “car sharing,” the growth of “do-it-yourselfers,” delaying or “reversing” retirement, taking on a part-time job … the list of “workarounds” goes on and on.

Americans have always resorted to workarounds to counter rising prices or help “make ends meet.” However, the list of necessary workarounds has “absolutely” been increasing Ron Paul told me, a trend he said is “going to continue to grow.”

As it always has, the market place has rewarded businesses that helped families save money.

Then again, lower prices do not necessarily equal a higher standard of living, a point made by John Williams, the creator of ShadowStats, the best known “alternative” measure of inflation.

To illustrate the difference between simply compiling prices without taking into account reductions in the quality of goods (or of “buying experiences”), Williams cited the example of his long-time tailor, who eventually had to close his haberdashery as customers fled to the mall and more affordable prices.

Yes, Williams could still buy clothes (in fact for a lower price), but the quality had diminished; so too had the level of service. The experience of acquiring clothes was not as satisfying or memorable. His question: Had he in fact maintained a “constant standard of living” by “substituting” suits from, say, JC Penney for the finer suits and richer experiences he had grown accustomed to?

Walmart assuredly saves consumers money. However, it also helped kill the downtown merchant, and with it our Norman Rockwellish memories of downtown America. “Self serve” killed the neighborhood “full-service” filling station, saving customers 40 cents a gallon on a fill-up, but also taking away our grandmother’s ability to get her tires and oil checked and her windshields cleaned on a regular basis (not to mention eliminating a popular first-time job for many males).

Netflix killed the neighborhood video store. Clothes that don’t require pressing, as well as employers allowing casual attire in the workplace, thinned the ranks of dry cleaners. iTunes largely killed the record store. Craigslist helped kill the (more expensive) newspaper classified section, expediting the slow death of the journalism industry. Barnes & Noble placed the independent book store on the extinction list, before Amazon threatened this same retailer.

Today, Uber is killing the taxi driver. Hulu and streaming video services threaten cable and the TV networks. TD Ameritrade threatens the traditional stock broker. Aldi (with its more affordable private label brands) threatens Kroger. Walmart, once unchallengeable, is today threatened by Amazon and Dollar General. People choosing to make their own turkey sandwich probably contributed to Subway closing more than 1,100 of its stores.

Most of these innovations/trends/changes kept CPI lower than it would have been otherwise, but did they actually allow people to maintain the same “standard of living” they enjoyed in prior years? Some innovations probably did; others probably did the opposite.

And how exactly did families from prior periods of time (often with just one income) afford to pay those full-service gas prices, or trade with the downtown hardware store instead of Home Depot?

Today it’s uncomfortable to think about, but in working on this story, a question I’d never thought about suddenly occurred to me. Namely, how did so many middle and upper-middle class families (families with just one income from the “poor” South) actually afford the full-time domestic “help” depicted in the movie and book of the same title?

Was everyone richer back then? Or is inflation higher today? Or, in “real” terms, is it possible the answer is “both?”

Labeled by Ron Paul as the “cruelest tax,” inflation is not a trivial topic, especially for the poor and those on fixed incomes. Even if people manage to “get by,” their new “standard of living” cannot be described as improved, superior or welcome.

Yes, the “Ten Percent” are doing better than ever, but is this really the case for the bottom 50 or 60 percent? If real standards of living were rising would it be this easy to identify so many “workarounds?”

All of these workarounds and business trends have been noticed. Details have been provided in journalism, academic papers, books and seminars.

What’s missing from much of this coverage is any effort to connect all the dots. That is, for some reason, the elephant in the room is too often ignored. The “elephant?” Practically every trend mentioned above shares one common antecedent – prices that, in the minds of consumers, had become unaffordable.

Perhaps we never pause to add up all the workarounds we are using. We might think about our decision to drop out of the civic club (and save on those membership dues), but we don’t tally up the other 10 changes we made for the exact same reason. If more people did this, inflation might become a bigger political issue than it is.

In fact, this might already be happening. In a country where so many people are forced to employ so many workarounds to make ends meet, politicians of a certain ideological bent might see a grand opportunity. In such a nation, for example, one might see a surge in presidential candidates suddenly espousing more liberal or even socialist “solutions.”

At least at the micro level of the economy, families are increasingly forced to deal with a reality they’ve been told is not a reality. Today’s economic conventional wisdom tells us that rising prices are no big deal. Indeed, we’re told what the economy really needs is more inflation.

But in a country where 46 million Americans rely on charity food banks to supplement their food intake, and 42 million qualify for food stamps, and millions more Americans are forced to max out credit cards to purchase necessities, do we really need higher prices?

Another trend I identified was the proliferation of payday and title loan businesses. Montgomery, AL (population 200,000) has nearly 100 such businesses, according to one city councilman. (By way of comparison, the city has 11 McDonald’s restaurants.)

One council member proposed an ordinance to limit the growth of such “stores.”

“If you see 18 of them on a main thoroughfare going into our city, it makes you think that the people who live around here must be desperate,” he said.

Well… yes. Apparently providing “quick cash” is another workaround created by entrepreneurs to serve (some say exploit) “desperate” people.

In researching this topic, I read dozens of stories on inflation. I also read the Reader Comment sections that followed these stories. As a measure of “Man on the Street” sentiment, these message boards were often more illuminating than the articles proper.

While Fed governors, academics and the business press declare that inflation is “low” and “contained,” real, live Americans are calling BS.

If one is seeking to determine whether inflation is a bigger deal than we are being told, simply read the Reader Comments. And then add up all the changes Americans have been forced to make in their lives to keep up with rising prices.

At least in my opinion, it’s this list of workarounds – always growing, never shrinking – that’s telling us the true story of inflation in America.

Bill Rice, Jr. is a freelance writer in Troy, Alabama. He can be reached at wjricejunior@gmail.com.

Connecting 50 dots…

Do headlines, presented in aggregate, reveal a story that’s not being fully told?

The 50 headlines listed below support the thesis that – perhaps more than ever – families and individuals must adopt “workarounds” to deal with rising prices and an economy that may not be as robust as portrayed in the media. The list is not comprehensive. Others can certainly identify trends or workarounds not immediately identified by the author. (Research by Bill Rice, Jr.)

Women enter workforce…

“Women enter workplace in massive numbers, death of 1-income family” (source)

Private label and store brands…

“Surge in customers buying Private Label brands described as retail ‘revolution’”(source)

Chicken, it’s what’s for dinner…

Chicken vs. Beef Consumption Comparison 1960 to 2018 – Chicken catches, blows past beef (source)

“2014: (Cheaper) Chicken more popular than beef for first time” (source)

Couponing…

“Coupon use (traditional and digital) soars, trend expected to grow” (source)

Shopping at ‘discount’ stores…

“Dollar General now has more stores than McDonald’s” (source)

Buying in bulk…

“Costco crushed it in 2018” (source)

‘Value’ menus…

“Fast food prices are rising, but so are deals” (source)

Yard sales, Swap meets…

“Why an old-school tradition is more popular than ever” (source)

“550 million people visit formal ‘buy-and-sell’ Facebook Groups each month” (source)

Cutting the cord…

“Cord-cutting keeps churning, 33 million people abandon pay TV in 2018” (source)

Cancelling the landline…

“Most households have given up the landline” (source)

Fewer haircuts…

Number of people getting 4 or more haircuts a year declines by 10 million (59 million in 2018 compared to 71.X million (?) in 2011) – Statista chart (source)

Using dry cleaners less often…

“In Illinois: Dry cleaning establishments decline by 50 percent over last 20 years”(source)

Declining attendance at sporting events…

      – NFL:

“Empty seats galore at NFL games” (source)

     – College Football:

“The Growing Problem of College Football Attendance” (source)

     – MLB:

“MLB attendance down 4 percent” (source)

     – NASCAR:

“NASCAR, Daytona numbers continue to sag” (source)

Movie theater attendance…

“Domestic movie theater attendance hit 25-year low in 2017” (source)

Golf anyone?…

“Why are we playing less golf?” (source)

Hunting …

“Hunting participation numbers continue to drop – and it’s a sorry situation” (hunters drop from 18 million to 10.5 million) (source)

Country club memberships…

“Money-losing country clubs adapt to changing times” (source)

Civic club memberships…

“Are service clubs dying?” (Rotary memberships decline by 70,000) (source)

Dentist office visits…

“Survey: More Americans want to visit the dentist (but visits drop by 4 percent)(source)

Cancel my subscription…

“Paid circulation at newspapers declines by 11 percent in 2017” (source)

“Time was giving magazines away for free” (source)

Slow death of newspaper industry …

“Newspaper crisis is growing: More than 1 in 5 local newspapers have closed since 2004” (source)

Homeschooling…

“In 16 states studied: Homeschooling grew by 25 percent in 4 years” Note: I deleted this one from story for for space reasons. (source)

Cremation over burial…

“Why is cremation becoming more popular in the U.S.?” (Growth described as ‘astronomical’) (source)

Casual is fine…

“Why Americans now dress so casually?” (source)

Voting with feet, plenty of Americans are moving out…

      Cities:

“41 percent of New Yorkers say they are going to leave” (source)

      States:

“Why are so many people moving out of the Northeast?” (source)

Rationing or eliminating prescription medications…

“How to pay less for your meds?” (source)

Moving back in with parents (or parents moving in with children)…

“More than 1/3 of young adults live at home (up from 26 percent)” (source)

“Aging adults moving in with children” (source)

Car pooling…

“Car pooling on the rise again?” (source)

And now car sharing…

“The big trends shaping the future of the car-sharing industry” (source)

Do It Yourself (DIY)…

“Why the huge do-it-yourself market is just getting started” (source)

Delaying retirement…

“More than half of 60-somethings say they are delaying retirement” (source)

Reverse retirement…

“Many retirees (one third) are going back to work” (source)

Part-time employment…

“America’s part-time worker problem is permanent, San Francisco Fed says” (source)

“More Americans need a second job to make ends meet” (source)

Making our own sandwich…

“Subway closed 1,100 restaurants in 2017” (also: 500 more in 2018) (source)

Self-serve took Gomer’s job…

“‘They’re like dinosaurs:’ But at least one full-service gas station still exists” (source)

Deflation fears… Wanted: More inflation

“Why is deflation a Central Bank’s worst nightmare?” (source)

Do we really need higher prices?…

“Feeding America serves 46 million people” (source)

“Food Stamp recipients number 42 million in 2017” (source)

“Credit card balances at all-time highs” (source)

Payday, title loan stores proliferate in many states…

“Payday lending has blossomed over past 20 years” (source)

“Number of Americans who took out title loans doubled in recent years” (source)

“Councilmen seek moratorium on payday lenders” (source)

*  *  *

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com. New benefit for subscribers/patrons: a monthly Q&A where I respond to your questions/topics.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2XWdBeb Tyler Durden

Chaos Erupts In Paris As “Armageddon” Protesters Riot During French Holiday

Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets of Paris and other French cities on Wednesday to mark International Workers’ Day (also known as Labor Day), only to clash with French riot police. The demonstrators included Yellow Vests, trade unionists, climate change protesters and Black Bloc (antifa) – which posted on social media that they wanted an “Armageddon” rally that would turn Paris into the “Riot Capital of Europe,” according to the Daily Mail

More than 7,400 police, gendarmes and soldiers were on hand to quell the more violent protesters. Interior Minister Christophe Castaner said “‘There’s no question of dramatising anything, it is a question of being prepared,” adding that “1,000 to 2,000 extremists” were expected to join the protests. 

Marching alongside labor unions, pensioners, students and others, the protesters were hit with large amounts of tear gas, baton strikes and other crowd control measures. 

According to The Localover 200 people have been arrested around Paris’s Montparnasse neighborhood. Of those, 148 remain in police custody. Police have performed over 12,400 checks on protesters, according to the report. 

Clashes with police begain in Paris around 1pm, as numerous hooded and masked troublemakers were spotted

The founder and former leader of France’s right-wing Front National (FN) party, Mean-Marie Le Pen delivered a May 1 speech at the Place des Pyramides during a rally to honor Jeanne d’Arc. 

“Let’s have the courage to be nationalists,” he told the crowd, predicting “serious social and political dramas” to come. 

Meanwhile in the southern French city of Toulouse, over 1,000 protesters made their way through the streets of la ville en rose, however local media has yet to report any violence according to The Local

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2J3feCC Tyler Durden

Congress Releases ‘Mueller Letter’ To AG Barr

Acquiescing to Democrats’ demands, AG Barr has turned over the full ‘Mueller Letter’ to the House Judiciary Committee, and the letter was released to the public shortly before the beginning of Wednesday’s testimony.

In the brief letter, ostensibly written to convey certain decisions made on redactions in the report, claimed that Barr’s summary was misleading and risked undermining public confidence in the Mueller probe.

Still, as the special counsel requested, the full redacted report has been released to the public.

Read the full text of the letter below:

Dear Attorney General Barr:

I previously sent you a letter dated March 25, 2019, that enclosed the introduction and executive summary for each volume of the Special Counsel?s report marked with redactions to remove any information that potentially could be protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure that concerned declination decisions; or that related to a charged case. We also had marked an additional two sentences for review and have now con?rmed that these sentences can be released publicly.

Accordingly, the enclosed documents are in a form that can be released to the public consistent with legal requirements and Department policies. I am requesting that you provide these materials to Congress and authorize their public release at this time.

As we stated in our meeting of March 5 and reiterated to the Department early in the afternoon of March 24, the introductions and executive summaries of our two-volume report accurately summarize this Of?ce?s work and conclusions. The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Of?ce?s work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is new public confusion about critical aSpects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public con?dence in the outcome of the investigations. See Department of Justice, Press Release (May 17, 2017).

While we understand that the Department is reviewing the full report to determine what is
appropriate for public release?a process that our Of?ce is working with you to complete?that
process need not delay release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate the
misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about
the nature and outcome of our investigation. It would also accord with the standard for public release of noti?cations to Congress cited in your letter. See 28 C.F.R. 609(c) (?the Attorney
General may determine that public release? of congressional noti?cations ?would be in the public
interest?).

Sincerely yours,

WMA.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2DGYuxj Tyler Durden

Ron Paul Warns: “Hapless” Guaido Now “Worth More Dead Than Alive” To Washington’s Venezuelan Coup-Creators

Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido failed to kick-start a military uprising on Tuesday. After this fizzle, RT reports that his life may be in danger from his own CIA backers, the director of the Ron Paul Institute argued in a debate.

Daniel McAdams and Ron Paul, the former libertarian representative from Texas, discussed the repeated attempts by Guaido to oust Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro with the backing from the US government. Despite all the efforts, Maduro remains in power, supported by many Venezuelans and in control of its military and police forces.

Paul said he was concerned that the Latin American country may be plunged into large-scale violence by some provocation.

“The big danger is a hard war breaking out. I’d still bet it won’t be too bad, with thousands of troops moving. But it could be a guerrilla war or something like that. If there is a false flag or some important official on either side gets killed, you can’t tell what might happen,” he said.

McAdams pointed out that Guaido himself, with his record of failing to mobilize the protest against the Maduro government, could be a target for such a provocation.

He has been a kind of a hapless figure so far. He calls for mass protests and no one shows up. I don’t think he realizes right now that he is actually now worth more dead than alive not only to the CIA, but also to his own opposition people. A shot in the crowd or something like that to take Guaido out. It might shock you, Dr. Paul, but the CIA is pretty good at this kind of things.

He said Tuesday’s events, when Guaido declared a military-backed coup to be underway in Caracas which as of now seems to have led to little consequence for Maduro, seemed like an act of desperation.

“[Guaido] said: ‘this is the final phase of [the] plan to overthrow the government’. It sort of smacks of desperation because he declared himself [interim] president in January and nothing happened. He kept trying to do things to get the military to turn and he was unsuccessful,” he said.

Paul blasted US officials rooting vigorously for Guaido and his efforts to seize power in Venezuela while denouncing with indignation things like the alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

“How many places have we been involved in in the last 20-30-40-50 years? I mean – that’s our business. It’s solidifying our empire,” he said. “I think it’s pure hypocrisy for us to think that we are doing [the interference in Venezuela] and we are against government interference. We love it, except’ when we don’t.”

The devoted constitutionalist added people like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo or National Security Advisor John Bolton, who appealed to Venezuelan soldiers to protect their nation’s constitution by siding with Guaido, were “a bunch of clowns.”

They don’t have the vaguest notion about what the constitutional law in our country would be like. And they are going to restore the constitutional law in other countries? It’s just clichés and nonsense!

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2V5oBsF Tyler Durden

WTI Slides After Huge Crude Build, Record Production

WTI slid lower overnight amid signs of a sharp increase in U.S. crude inventories from API and concerns over the strength of economic growth in China, but rebounded back to pre-API level ahead of this morning’s official inventory data as the dollar tumbled.

Prices also slid as an attempted uprising against President Nicolas Maduro in OPEC member Venezuela appeared to fizzle.

“The market is currently witnessing the largest number of barrels subject to potential outage in many years, between Venezuela, Iran, Nigeria, Algeria and Libya,” said Leo Mariani, a KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. analyst.

API

  • Crude +6.81 mm (+1.5mm exp)

  • Cushing +1.353mm

  • Gasoline -1.055mm (-1.5mm exp)

  • Distillates -2.058mm (-1mm exp)

DOE

  • Crude +9.93mm (+1.5mm exp) – highest since Nov 2018

  • Cushing +265k

  • Gasoline +917k (-1.5mm exp)

  • Distillates -1.307mm (-1mm exp)

US crude inventories rose for the 5th week in the last 6 with a 9.934mm build – the biggest since November. At the same time, the 10-week streak of draws in gasoline inventories is over as stocks rose 917k last week…

“Amid this host of bullish catalysts is one deepening pocket of weakness — U.S. oil stocks are swelling due to an upswing in crude inventories,” said Stephen Brennock, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates Ltd. in London.

“Glum alarm bells are ringing louder in the U.S.”

US Crude production rose to a new record high, bucking the lower rig count trend…

Notably, February crude output was 11.68 million barrels a day in the latest monthly report released Tuesday. As Bloomberg notes, that’s quite a bit lower than the 12 million in the EIA’s weekly figures for the month.

After erasing the post-API drop. the machines started to lose control into the DOE print and after the major build, WTI prices slipped lower…

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2USQM99 Tyler Durden

Tesla’s ‘Dirty’ Little Earnings Secret: Pollution, Not Profits, Saved Musk

Authored by Wolf Richter via WolfStreet.com,

The surprise in the SEC 10-Q filing when no one was supposed to pay attention.

On April 29th, when no one was supposed to pay attention any longer, Tesla filed its quarterly report Form 10-Q with the SEC. Tesla had reported “earnings” on April 24, a doozie of a net loss of $702 million. But today, after the hoopla of its earnings report had died down, Tesla disclosed a slew of things that it hadn’t disclosed last week, including a record amount of sales of pollution credits.

Without those taxpayer-funded pollution credits that Tesla gets from the government and sells to other companies, its loss as automaker and solar-panel company would have been $918 million and its negative cash flow wouldn’t have been a cash drain of $919 million but a cash sinkhole of $1.14 billion

Tesla calls these taxpayer-funded pollution credits – part of the package of rich corporate welfare programs that Corporate America benefits from in numerous ways – “regulatory credits.”

The sales of these regulatory credits are booked as revenue, so they increase revenues by that amount. Since there are no costs associated with them, they also inflate by that amount gross profits, income from operations, net income, and cash flow. In other words, those taxpayer-funded credits are at the core of Tesla’s business model and flow straight from the top line all the way down to the bottom line.

Tesla discloses these “regulatory credits” – when it finally discloses them – in two categories:

  • Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) credits and

  • Non-ZEV regulatory credits.

On April 24, as I noted at the time, Tesla disclosed merely its $15 million in ZEV credits. But it kept its non-ZEV credits secret, and for a very good reason, with this kind of earnings chart:

On April 29th, in its 10-Q filing, it disclosed what was really going on with one sentence in a note discussing the composition of its revenues under the heading, “Automotive & Services and Other Segment” (I added the bold):

“Additionally, there was an increase of $170.6 million in sales of non-ZEV regulatory credits to $200.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2019.”

Those regulatory credits in Q1 of $15 million in ZEV credits plus $200.6 million in non-ZEV credits amount to $215.6 million, or 4.8% of the Tesla’s revenues. These disclosures show to what extent it depends on the taxpayer for revenues, profits (well, lower losses), and cash flow.

Without those credits:

  • Gross profit wouldn’t have been $566 million but merely $350 million.

  • Net loss wouldn’t have been $702 million but $917.6 million, which would have been its largest loss ever by far.

  • Operating cash flow wouldn’t have been the whopper of a negative $919.5 million that it disclosed on April 24, but a negative $1.137 billion!

This is the reason Tesla doesn’t disclose these credits fully during its earnings release when the media might jump on it (possibly) but delays the disclosure until it files its quarterly 10-Q with the SEC usually the following week.

Without the revenues from selling those taxpayer-funded credits to other companies, Tesla’s operations as an automaker and a solar-panel maker would look a whole lot worse than they already do. And this comes on top of the enormous benefits Tesla still reaps from the now phasing-out taxpayer-funded credits that buyers of its vehicles obtain from the federal government and from some state governments.

The ruse that helped Tesla’s shares jump 20%. Read...  Tesla Reports Another Doozie

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2GTGBNY Tyler Durden

ISM Plunges To Oct 2016 Lows As US “Manufacturers Seem Sceptical That Demand Will Persist”

Following Canada’s Manufacturing PMI plunge into contraction in April, Markit reported US Manufacturing saw a very modest rebound in April (from 52.4 to 52.6) despite the slowest growth in employment in two years.

ISM was considerably worse, plunging to its weakest since October 2016

The gauge for export orders fell below 50 for the first time in three years while imports missed the threshold for the first time in two years, the latest evidence President Donald Trump’s trade wars are weighing on factories.

The measure for new orders also slipped to near the weakest since 2016, indicating softer demand. At the same time, the inventoriesgauge increased, suggesting stockpiles continue to expand, a trend that will likely eventually reverse and be a drag on growth.

ISM’s employment gauge fell to near a two-year low, signaling weakness ahead of Friday’s U.S. jobs report.

The index of prices paid dropped to 50, a signal that inflation pressures are likely to remain muted.

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at IHS Markit said:

“Although the PMI ticked higher in April, the survey remains consistent with manufacturing acting as a drag on the economy at the start of the second quarter, albeit with the rate of contraction easing. Historical comparisons indicate that the survey’s output gauge needs to rise above 53.5 to signal growth of factory production. As such, the data add to signs that the economy looks set to slow after the stronger than expected start to the year.

Employment growth also disappointed as hiring slipped to the lowest for nearly two years, albeit in part due to firms reporting difficulties finding staff amid the current tight labour market.

“There was better news on the order book front, however, with inflows of new business rising and firms signalling an improved export performance. Unfortunately, on balance, manufacturers seem sceptical that the rise in demand will persist, with future expectations of output growth slumping lower in April.

“Both input cost and factory gate price inflation rates meanwhile eased further, down to the lowest for over one and a half years, hinting that consumer price inflation rates will have continued to cool in April.”

So, probably best for Jay Powell to ignore the hard data and focus on the weak surveys to provide cover for his dovishness.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2GP0eFK Tyler Durden

Watch Live: AG Barr Testifies Before Senate As Dems Demand He Resign Over ‘Mueller Letter’

Last night’s deep-state ‘leak’ of a letter penned by Robert Mueller to AG (and longtime friend and colleague) William Barr complaining that Barr’s summary of Mueller’s findings, released several weeks before the redacted report, didn’t capture the full “context, nature and substance” of the report was of course conveniently timed to hand Democrats plenty of ammunition to tear into Barr during Wednesday morning’s hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

(Of course, as we’ve pointed out, when Barr pressed Mueller about whether Barr’s summary was inaccurate, the special counsel demurred, and affirmed that he didn’t think it was. Mueller’s letter was reportedly dated March 27. Barr released the summary on March 24.)

But the fact Barr insisted during back-to-back Congressional testimony on April 9 & April 10 that he didn’t know where the special counsel stood regarding the AG’s characterization of the report has already prompted some Democratic senators to demand Barr’s resignation, per the Washington Post.

Chris Van Hollen, the Senator who asked Barr about what he knew about Mueller’s feelings about the summary, demanded Barr resign and once again accused him of being a ‘propaganda chief’ for the president.

He labeled his position “the most recent example of the attorney general acting as the chief propagandist for the Trump administration instead of answering questions in a straightforward and objective manner.”

In a prepared statement for the committee, Barr defended his handling of the special counsel’s investigation.

“As Attorney General, I serve as the chief law-enforcement officer of the United States, and it is my responsibility to ensure that the Department carries out its law-enforcement functions appropriately. The Special Counsel’s investigation was no exception.”

Pelosi seized on the reports about the Mueller letter to demand that Barr release the full Mueller report and all the underlying docs that the Demos have subpoenaed.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler demanded that Barr appear before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday for another hearing, as the Dems have requested.

And Chuck Schumer demanded that Barr bring the full Mueller letter with him to Wednesday’s hearing, and also demanded that Mueller appear before Congress to testify.

The Dems lapdogs in the press have also piled on, with CNN’s Chris Cilizza warning that “William Barr is in deep trouble” in an editorial published Wednesday morning shortly before the hearing was set to begin.

With all the drama, Wednesday’s hearing is bound to be a lively one. Watch live below:

And Read Barr’s prepared remarks below:

AG Barr Written Statement for the Record to Senate Judiciary by Zerohedge on Scribd

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2Y25zQZ Tyler Durden

The Curious Case Of Rising Fuel Prices And Shrinking Inflation

Authored by Michael Lebowitz via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

On Friday, April 26, 2019, the market was stunned with a much stronger than expected 3.2% rate of first-quarter economic growth. Wall Street expectations were clearly off the mark, ranging from 1.3-2.3%. The media took this as a sign the economy is roaring. To wit, a headline from the Washington Post started “US Economy Feels Like the 1990s.”

Upon first seeing the GDP report, we immediately looked with suspicion at the surprisingly low GDP price deflator.  The GDP price deflator is an inflation measure used to normalize GDP so that prior periods are comparable to each other without the effects of inflation.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reports nominal and real GDP. Real GDP is the closely followed number that is reported by the media and quoted by the Fed and politicians. Since the GDP price deflator is subtracted from the nominal GDP number, the larger the deflator, the smaller the difference between real and nominal GDP. 

The BEA reported that the first quarter GDP price deflator was 0.9%, well below expectations of 1.7%. Had the deflator met expectations, the real GDP number would have been about 2.4%, still high but closer to the upper range of economists’ expectations.

Fueling the Deflator

Like Wall Street, we were expecting a deflator that was in line or possibly higher than its recent average. The average deflator over the last two years is 2.05%, and it is running slightly higher at 2.125% over the last four quarters. Our expectation for an average or above average deflator in Q1 2019 were in large part driven by oil prices which rose by 32% over the entire first quarter. Due to the price move and the contribution of crude oil effects on inflation, oil prices should have had an unusually high impact on inflation measures in the first quarter of 2019.

Per the American Automobile Association (AAA), gas prices in the United States rose from $2.25 per gallon in January to $2.75 by the end of March, a gain of 22%. Gasoline RBOB futures, the most commonly quoted contract for wholesale gasoline prices, tell a similar story, rising from $1.30 per gallon to $1.83 over the quarter, for a gain of 41%.

With a good amount of digging through the BEA website, we learned that despite the substantial rise in the price of oil and gasoline in the first quarter, the BEA actually reported a decline in fuel prices. The BEA, which uses data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, reported that fuel prices fell on average by 7.8% during the quarter. The table below for fuel prices (BLS code CUSR0000SETB) from the BLS is the direct input used to account for energy prices within the GDP deflator.

The BLS is not wrong; they are just using a three-month average, and therefore their data lags by three months. Essentially, the fuel price data feeding the first quarter GDP deflator is from the fourth quarter of 2018. During this period, the price of oil and gas fell precipitously. 

With a little back of the envelope math, we conclude that had the price of oil been unchanged the deflator would have been approximately 1.45%, and Real GDP growth would have been 2.75%. Had the price risen, instead of fallen, by 7.8% the deflator would have been 1.99%, and GDP would have been 2.20% and on par with expectations. Had it risen more than 7.8%, Real GDP would have been even lower.

Implications

The BEA is not cooking the books. However, by this methodology using old data, sharp changes in fuel prices will result in flawed quarterly data. This problem is self-correcting. For instance, the sharp decline in oil prices in the fourth quarter which helped lower the deflator in the first quarter will be offset when the surge in first quarter oil prices weigh on second-quarter GDP. The graph below shows Gasoline RBOB futures to highlight the recent volatility in gasoline prices.   

It is not just the deflator that concerns us about second-quarter GDP. In this weekend’s newsletter, The Bull Is Back… But Will It Stay? we stated the following: 

Almost 50% of the increase in GDP came from slower imports and a massive surge in inventories which suggests slower consumer consumption which comprises roughly 70% of economic growth. In other words, future GDP reports will also likely be weaker. (Net Trade and Inventories was 1.68% of the 3.2% rise.)”

The ratio of inventory to sales has steadily climbed over the last 12 months. If consumption stays weak, we should see companies backing off on inventory stocking. Rising inventories increase GDP and falling inventories have the opposite effect. As a result and as stated above “future GDP reports will also likely be weaker.”

Looking ahead, we are confident that the second quarter GDP deflator will be 2% or higher. We also believe that if consumption remains frail, companies will slow their inventory growth.  While difficult to predict as we are only a month into the quarter, these two important factors are likely to weigh on second-quarter GDP. Keep in mind, these are only two of thousands of factors, but they play an outsized role in determining GDP.

Currently, and subject to change as more economic data is released, we have a strong suspicion that the positive surprise in the Q1 report will be followed with an equally surprising weak Q2 report. As stock markets probe new record highs, the question for investors is, will the market care?

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2ISakJg Tyler Durden

SEC Commissioner Objects To Musk Settlement: “I Cannot Support It”

Over the weekend, the late Friday headline snuck through that the SEC and Elon Musk had once again agreed to a settlement over Musk’s use of Twitter, and the subsequent allegation that Musk should be held in contempt of court for violating a previous settlement. Now, despite Judge Allison Nathan signing off on a second settlement, one voice out of the SEC is speaking out against what he sees as a “bizarre series of events”. 

The news of the second settlement being reached over the weekend went relatively unnoticed, with it again being perceived by many as letting Musk off easy, despite being far more detailed in defining what he is and is not allowed to do on Twitter going forward.

While many skeptics and Musk critics derided the second settlement, a more prominent voice has emerged from the criticism: a commissioner at the SEC, Robert Jackson. Jackson, the sole Democrat at the SEC, issued a dissenting statement on Tuesday evening after Judge Nathan approved the deal that resolved the new settlement between Musk and the SEC, according to FT.

Jackson had sharp tongued criticism toward the settlement, stating: “Given Mr. Musk’s conduct, I cannot support a settlement in which he does not admit what is crystal clear to anyone who has followed this bizarre series of events: Mr. Musk breached the agreement he made last year with the Commission—and with American investors.”

Musk had been accused of violating a previous settlement last year that required him to get his tweets pre-approved. The new agreement outlines additional information that requires advanced approval. Musk has denied breaking his initial settlement, an almost laughable defensive posture that ultimately wound up working.

The comment is a relatively rare dissent at the SEC, who has been united for the most part, at least in public, on enforcement actions under Jay Clayton. Two Republican commissioners had privately objected to the initial settlement with Mr. Musk last year. And when you can make a point clear to both sides of the aisle – namely that Mr. Musk might be getting special treatment from the SEC – why wouldn’t it warrant a further look and additional scrutiny from the public?

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2GR1s36 Tyler Durden