Gun-Maker Stocks Slump After Florida Imposes Age Restriction On Gun Purchases, Bans Bump Stocks

Shares of gunmakers American Outdoor and Sturm Ruger tumbled to session lows as Florida Governor Rick Scott commented that his state will require all gun purchasers to be aged 21 or above, and additionally bans all sales and purchases of bump stocks.

“I know there are some who are advocating a mass takeaway of 2nd amendment rights for all Americans. That is not the answer”

“We will require all individuals purchasing firearms to be 21 or older,” Florida Governor Rick Scott says in press conference (noting that exceptions will be created for active duty and reserve military and spouses, National Guard members and law enforcement).

Scott will work with legislature over next two weeks on plan that will focus on gun laws, school safety, and mental health.

“I want to make it virtually impossible for anyone who has mental issues to use a gun”

 

“We can’t trust the federal process, which is why we have to make these changes here in Florida,”

“We will completely ban the purchase or sale of bump stocks,”

Furthermore, Scott noted that the state would invest $500m in school safety plan after shooting, and calls for law enforcement officers in public schools.

Florida to establish funding to require access to dedicated mental health counselors at every school.

The goal of this plan of action is to make massive changes in protecting our schools, provide significantly more resources for mental health, and do everything we can to keep guns out of the hands of those dealing with mental problems or threatening harm to themselves or others.

RGR and AOBC are down around 4% today…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2sNVbSh Tyler Durden

Inequality Is “Natural” – Get Over It

Authored by Nicholas Colas via DataTrekResearch.com,

Perusing one of our favorite information sources – the “Most read” articles on the website for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) – we found the following tidbits:

  • Women live longer than men, even during periods of severe famines and epidemics. Moreover, their competitive advantage starts young. Baby girls are much tougher than baby boys.

  • You can’t necessarily feel it, but your eardrums actually move when your eyes move. This allows you to identify the sources of sounds more quickly.

  • We’ve included links to both papers at the end of this note.

The paper that really caught my eye, and what we want to review briefly today, is called “Inequality in Nature and Society”. Income and wealth inequality are large and growing topics at the moment, and it is spreading into discussions related to a raft of capital markets issues. In the past week I have spent more time talking to press and financial television anchors about wealth inequality than volatility or valuation. This is a conversation that will not go away, so it is worth getting smarter about it.

The most appealing thing about the paper is its simple message: “Inequality” happens across nature in the same way we see it in national Gini coefficients and the yacht harbor in Monaco. The relative wealth of the world’s billionaires closely resembles the distribution of tree types in the Amazon. Put another way, a few people have a lot of wealth, and a few types of trees dominate the South American rain forest. Also, a few species of animal and plant life tend to dominate natural communities around the globe, just as a small number of the world’s citizens make incomes far higher than the median.

Now, humans aren’t trees or plants, so when wealth inequality becomes too great societies tend to self-correct. War and revolution are history’s favorite ways to readjust things. More recently, social movements like trade unions and government programs also perform some of the re-adjustment.

The authors also note that inequality tends to grow – and society’s ability to combat it lessens – during periods of “Societal upscaling”. The relevant example here is the growing power of technology to connect people in the 21st century. Prior, but analogous, case studies would be the opening of the West in America, or the revolutions brought by railroads, and media such as print (1800s) radio (1920s) and television (1950s). In all cases, the benefits of growth went to a relatively small number of people.

These periods of “upscaling” tend to increase inequality because returns on intellectual or physical capital both skyrocket and compound for long periods. A few people, by luck or skill (or both) see their investments grow by +1000% or more for 5-10 years. Most do not. The authors of the paper note that Western Europe has seen this phenomenon repeat itself for 1,000 years. It is not new to 2018.

The authors outline 2 ways inequality diminishes: suppressing the dominant players, or pulling up the broad lower end of the distribution. In nature, the former is common. Humans tend to prefer the latter.

In the end, the most important point I took away from the paper was this: we are likely living in the greatest age of “societal upscaling” the world has ever known, so it is no surprise that inequality is a major topic of interest.It may be small comfort that all this is “natural”. But it is important to remember that it is. The next recession or stock market crash won’t really change it. Natural forces are hard to shift once momentum builds.

*  *  *

Inequality in Nature and Society: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/50/13154

Women live longer than men: http://www.pnas.org/content/115/4/E832

Ears and eyes: http://www.pnas.org/content/115/6/E1309

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Cff9Jn Tyler Durden

Powell Warns Of “Rising Leverage & Elevated Valuations”; Dudley, Rosengren: QE (Or More) Will Be Back

Ahead of Fed Chair Powell’s first semi-annual monetary policy report to Congress next week (brought forward to 2/27), The Fed has released his prepared remarks warning that “valuations are still elevated across a range of asset classes” and fears “signs of rising non-financial leverage.”

But before Powell’s remarks were dropped, both Dudley and Rosengren are on the tape this morning talking super dovish about QE as “useful to have in the toolkit for those times when the short-term interest rate tool may not be available,” adding that The Fed is “quite likely” to require large-scale asset purchases again because real rates will remain low due to slow productivity and labor-force growth.

And adding that “if LSAPs are indeed not effective, then the Fed may need to take other measures.”

So ‘whatever it takes’?

Furthermore, they attempted to calm market fears by claiming that balance-sheet normalization “has been non-disruptive” unlike the 2013 bond market taper tantrum.

The U.S. labor market is near or beyond full employment, while some pockets of finance are showing signs of rising leverage and high valuations, according to a Federal Reserve report.

“The labor market in early 2018 appears to be near or a little beyond full employment,” the Fed said in the February 2018 Monetary Policy Report published in Washington on Friday. “The unemployment rate is now somewhat below most estimates of its natural rate.”

The 55-page report, released days before Chairman Jerome Powell delivers his first semi-annual testimony before House and Senate committees, reprised recent economic data and the Fed’s policy actions. Powell will preside over his first meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee as chairman on March 20-21.

Overall financial vulnerabilities “remain moderate on balance,” according to the report. “Valuation pressures continue to be elevated across a range of asset classes.”

There are signs that “nonbank financial leverage has been increasing in some areas,” the report said, such as credit to stock investors such as hedge funds.

Full Prepared Remarks:

 

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2F00dQk Tyler Durden

It’s “Time To Tune-Out The Cheerleaders” – Textbook Progression To A Bear Market

Via Global Macro Monitor,

OK.  Not a bear market quite yet.

The official level of the S&P500 for the current sell-off to morph into a bear market (down 20 percent from local high) is 2298.30, down 14.92 percent from today’s close.  The official correction level, 2585.58, was hit and broken on February 8th.

We believe there will be a stock bear market in 2018 but less confident on its depth and length, however.   We will turn that page, if, and when, we get there.

Key Data and Levels

The following table is updated with some key economic indicators and S&P target levels.

 

Table_Feb21

Recall in our earlier posts (see here and here), there have been three other massive volatility shocks since 1950,  similar to the one the S&P500 just experienced.

1) 1955: Ike’s heart attack; 

2) 1962:  the “Kennedy slide” or JFK bear market; and

3) 1987:  the “crash” bear market, which lasted only 38 days.

We threw out Ike’s heart attack as it was not a prelude to a bear market.  The S&P500 recovered shortly after the sharp Monday sell-off after President Eisenhower had a heart attack on the 8th hole at Cherry Hills Country Club the prior Saturday afternoon.

Bear Markets Do Not Happen Without Recession?

To that, we say, poppycock!  Time to tune out the cheerleaders.

The data are clear.  The U.S. economy thrived during the 1962 bear market, growing at more than 6 percent, on average.  The economy grew at 3 ½  percent in 1987.   No recession, not even close, in those two bears.

The Great Moderation

Before the early 1980’s, the U.S. economy experienced much higher short-term volatility. The FRED table illustrates the dampening of volatility over the past 30 years, though at much lower growth rates.  Economists refer to this recent period as The Great Moderation.

Debt Concerns

The current U.S. government debt-to-GDP ratio is more than double what is was in both the 1987 and 1962 bear markets.  It is the crux of the current sell-off, in our opinion.

We sense that the global markets are growing increasingly concerned about high debt levels in a rising interest rate environment.   Couple that with Washington’s fiscal promiscuity and extreme valuations and overbought conditions, and the ingredients of a bear market are baked in.  It is also probably why the dollar is so weak.

We can make a very bearish case with debt doom loops and all kinds of macro instability, but won’t go there until price discovery takes us there.

Nevertheless,  keep these words on your radar:  fette Schwänze, colas gordas,  grosses queues, or in simple English,  Fat Tails.   As volatility spikes,  girth increases.

Recent Price Action

Notice how the market traded today.  Up big then reversed as the 10-year yield spiked through 2.95 percent.

Interest Rates

Interest rates were not a concern in 1962 as the data show the 10-year yield declined 30 basis points during the bear market.  Not the case in 1987,  however, where  rising interest rates and a weak dollar culminated in the October 19th global stock market crash.

Some possible reasons for the stock market crash of 1987 and for the rapid psychological shift of the market participants:

  • rapidly increasing short term US interest rates (the annualized yield of 3M US Treasury Bills increased from 5.30% on 20.01.1987 to the high print of the year: 7.19% on 14.10.1987 – an increase of 189 basis points)
  • rapidly increasing long term US interest rates (the yield of 30Y US Treasury Bonds increased from the low print of the year: 7.29% on 09.01.1987 to the high print of the year: 10.25% on 19.10.1987 – an increase of 296 basis points)
  • weakening US dollar (=falling against most major foreign currencies)
  • deteriorating US current account deficit
  • escalating US government debt
  • very high price-earnings-ratios (P/E)
  • very low dividend yields
  • very bullish investor sentiment figures (= too much optimism by investors)
  • deteriorating “market breadth” (e.g.: weak Advance-Decline-Line)

Source:  www.sniper.at

Wow,  sounds eerily familiar, no?

Market Recovery Falters

The S&P could not hold the key 61.8 percent Fibo level at 2742.92 nor 2728.08, its 50-day moving average.

Moreover, the index closed today just below the 50 percent Fibonacci retracement level.

Normal Path To A Bear Market

At Friday’s intraday high,  the index had retraced 65.18 percent of its first leg down, very close to the 1962 (76.42 percent) and 1987 (69.49 percent)  retracements (see table).

In other words, last week’s recovery was a normal bounce off the initial lows on the path to a bear market.

Levels To Watch

The next critical levels on the downside for the S&P is the 38.2 percent Fibo at 2662.64 and 2653.31, the 100-day moving average.

On the upside,  2702.78, the 50 percent Fibo.   Then some clustering in a range of 2730-2755:  the 50-day at 2728..08; the 20-day at 2737.92; the 61.8 percent Fib at 2742.92; and, most important, Friday’s high at 2754.42, the new marker.

Also watch the bearish cross as the 20-day moving average trades through the 50-day, which is not far off.

A 1962-1987 Hybrid Bear Market?

Though the S&P500 has the same theme, set-up, and backdrop as the JFK post-election rally and bear market in 1961-62,  the fundamentals drivers of the current correction are very similar to those of the 1987 rout (see above).

JFK_Trump_Feb21

As of today’s close,  the Trump and JFK S&P500 sit right on top of each other,  0.68 percent apart, 323 trading days after election day.

Recovery

Though the 1987 bear market bottomed the day after the crash, the S&P500 did not recover its August 25, 1987, high until July 21, 1989.   It could be sometime before the index makes a new high.  Or maybe not.

Stay tuned.

Appendix:

Economy_Feb21

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2GFcsie Tyler Durden

Gates To Plead Guilty In Mueller Probe

Speculation has been mounting for weeks that former Paul Manafort lieutenant (and now indicted co-conspirator) Rick Gates might be preparing to cooperate with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Now, the New York Times is reporting that Mueller could announce a Gates guilty plea as soon as Friday afternoon, less than a day after Gates fired his lawyers following the unsealing of a superseding indictment that also slapped Manafort and Gates with bank and tax fraud charges.

Gates, a longtime political consultant who met Manafort when he interned at one of Manafort’s companies, is expected to strike a plea deal, which could be a significant development in the investigation  as Gates presumably can offer a significant amount of incriminating information about Manafort and his activities relating to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich.

Gates

Gates’ primary concern has been protecting his family, both emotionally and financially, since wealthy Republican donors who were supposed to foot the bill for his defense have reportedly welched on the funding. He’s also hoping to spare his family the embarrassment of a drawn-out trial. Gates rolling over would also increase pressure on Manafort to roll over – presumably providing ‘damning’ evidence against President Trump.

Mueller’s team has traced more than $75 million that passed through offshore accounts, and has accused Manafort of laundering more than $30 million to pay for real estate and luxury goods in the US.

Gates transferred more than $3 million from the offshore accounts to his own accounts. Gates took over Eastern Europe duties at Manafort’s old lobbying firm, Manafort & Davis, back in 2008.

Mueller has already secured guilty pleas from former National Security Adviser Mike Flynn and former adviser George Papadopoulos.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2CDCpwy Tyler Durden

Fed Chair Powell “Doesn’t Stand A Chance”

Authored by MN Gordon via EconomicPrism.com,

Jerome Powell, the new Chairman of the Federal Reserve, just completed his third week on the job.  He’s hardly had enough time to learn how to operate the office coffee maker, let alone the all-in-one printer.  He still doesn’t know what roach coach menu items induce a heinous gut bomb.

Yet across the planet, folks high and low are already telling him exactly how he should do his job.  What’s more, they’re passing advanced judgement on things that may or may not happen.  For example, the South China Morning Post recently offered the following opinion:

“President Donald Trump may have done Janet Yellen a favour by not giving her a second term as Chairwoman of the Federal Reserve.  Her successor, Jerome Powell, may have inherited a poisoned chalice.  The Fed will have to up the pace of U.S. rate hikes or risk accusations of being behind the curve as markets react to signs of rising inflation.”

When Powell showed up to work on February 5, for his first day on the job, the general consensus was that the Fed would raise the federal funds rate three times this year, at 25 basis points – or 0.25 percent – per increase.  But now that consumer prices are rising at an annual rate of 2.1 percent, average hourly earnings are increasing at an annual rate of 2.9 percent, and Congress has passed a massive two year budget deal, twitchy economists are questioning if three rate hikes will be enough to keep inflation in check.

Over the last two weeks their chants for four rate hikes in 2018 have grown louder.  Goldman Sachs has even floated the five rate hike scenario.

Alas, this is the sort of ridiculous minutia that policy makers and analysts must navel-gaze over in a planned economy.  The truth is, Powell can’t win regardless of what he does. 

Whether he raises rates three times or four times – or ten times – he’ll get it wrong.  Here’s why…

Chronic Shortages

The economy is a complex living organism that’s continuously evolving and always subject to change.  One relationship at one moment can be completely different at another moment.  Supply and demand are incessantly adjusting and readjusting to meet the conditions of the market.

These continuous interactions provide a natural and efficient response to supply shortages and gluts.  Even in a moderately free market economy, bakeries do not run out of bread when there’s a wheat crop shortage due to a late season frost.  The shelves never go empty.  Rather, the price of bread rises and consumers adjust their spending accordingly.

Centrally planned economies, on the other hand, are inclined to frequent, intensive and chronic shortages.  Bureaucrats, armed with spiral bound planning reports and pie graphs, are incapable of fixing the proper prices for gumballs and gasoline by diktat.  There’s simply too much going on and too many moving parts for them to consider.

With the best of intentions, the noble planner makes their best guess of the appropriate price control.  Then things invariably go haywire.

In practice, the supply of certain goods or commodities may be more than adequate.  But when a price administrator enforces an artificially low price, consumers are prone to wasteful behavior.  They’re compelled to demand a greater amount than is supplied.  Hence, the store shelves remain perpetually empty.

Certainly, uniform standards work well for units and measurements.  They’re critical to building consistency and standardization of hardware and parts.  They’re even necessary to effective communication and computer programming.  For certain things, however, uniform standards come up short…

Haunted by Ghosts of the Old Eastern Bloc

When it comes to the pricing of goods, commodities and services, commanding fixed prices by a central authority is an utter failure.  This was effectively proven by the experiences of the centrally planned economies of the old communist Eastern Bloc countries during the second half of the 20th century.

Regrettably, price controls don’t stop with just goods, commodities, and services.  The United States, Europe, and Japan have been doing their darnedest during the early years of the 21st century to show that these ghosts of the old Eastern Bloc also haunt credit.

Remember, credit, like a commodity or good, has a price attached to it.  The price of credit is the rate of interest a lender charges to a borrower.  Like fixing the price of a commodity or good by a central planning authority, fixing the price of credit by a central bank – such as the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, or Bank of Japan – is presently being shown to also be an utter failure.

Someone with even a dim perception of the world around them can peer out and discern many strange and grotesque occurrences: Housing prices that far outpace incomes.  Total household debt at $13.5 trillion.  And an entire generation of Millennials that went $1.4 trillion in student loan debt for college degrees that have been debased in stature to what a high school diploma represented for prior generations.

These represent gross misallocations of capital.  What’s more, they would’ve never come into existence or ballooned out to this magnitude without the Fed’s credit market price controls.

Fed Chairman Powell doesn’t stand a chance.  Bernanke and Yellen before him oversupplied the economy with cheap credit.  Now Powell must mop it up with higher interest rates.  Yet because the U.S. economy’s been pushed to the brink with record debt levels it simply can’t afford higher interest rates.

Without question, Powell will find the break point.  Moreover, when the next great liquidity crisis hits it won’t be a failing of free market capitalism.  It’ll be the failing of the central planners and the system they wrought.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2FpRtAB Tyler Durden

Two People Shot Dead Outside UBS Bank In Zurich

Two people have been shot dead outside a branch of the UBS bank in the otherwise boring and peaceful Swiss city of Zurich, the local police said according to BBC.

Images in the Swiss media showed two bodies lying motionless, close together on a pavement, with eyewitnesses reporting four or five shots being fired.

The media images showed what appeared to be a pistol close to the hand of one of the bodies on the pavement.

There is a large police presence at the scene in the Europaallee area. Zurich police said the situation was now under control and that there was no danger to the public.

Authorities told local media they were responding to an incident in downtown Zurich, near the Swiss financial hub’s main train station.

The reasons behind the shooting remain unclear.

Developing…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2omsEP1 Tyler Durden

Watch Trump At CPAC: Slams “Cowardly” Florida Cop, Unveils “Largest-Ever” Korean Sanctions

During his second appearance at the annual CPAC conference – an event that has been widely credited with launching Trump into politics – President Trump is preparing to announce new sanctions against North Korea during his speech, according to the Washington Examiner.

The new sanctions will be targeted at the company’s seafaring vessels – and were presumably inspired by US satellites that captured illegal ship-to-ship transfers of oil to North Korean ships.

Ahead of the speech, Trump slammed a Florida cop who failed to stop the mass high school shooting in Parkland, Fla., saying the officer lacked “courage” and “didn’t react properly.”

Trump is scheduled to begin his speech at 10 am. Watch it live below:

Some excerpts from the speech have already leaked out, providing a few hints about the speech’s contents.

Trump presumably begins by declaring Americans should proudly stand for the pledge…

We salute our great American flag, we put our hands on our hearts for the pledge of Allegiance, and we all PROUDLY STAND for the National Anthem.

Rev. Billy Graham, who died earlier this week, also receives a brief presidential eulogy…

We will never forget the historic crowds, the voice, the energy, and the profound faith of a preacher named Billy Graham.

Of course, Trump addresses his meetings with survivors of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School…

On Wednesday, I had the honor of meeting with students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, with families who have lost their children in prior shootings, and with members of the local community in Washington, D.C. Our whole nation was moved by their strength and courage.

He also once again pushes for arming teachers…

When we declare our schools to be gun-free zones it just puts our students in more danger well-trained gun-adept teachers and coaches should be able to carry concealed firearms. We should do what works. This includes commonsense measures that will protect the rights of law-abiding Americans while helping to keep guns out of the hands of those who pose a danger to themselves and to others.

And exhorts Congress to include funding for his border wall in an immigration bill that has effectively stalled…

To secure our country, we are calling on Congress to build a border wall to stop dangerous drugs and criminals. But Nancy Pelosi has a different plan. In a recent interview, Pelosi suggested mowing the grass so people can’t be smuggled through the grass.

The sanctions against North Korea are, according to Trump, the largest ever…

Today I am announcing that we are launching the LARGEST-EVER set of new sanctions on the North Korean regime. The Treasury Department will soon be taking new action to further cut off sources of revenue and fuel that the regime uses to fund its nuclear program and sustain its military by targeting 56 vessels, shipping companies, and trade businesses that are assisting North Korea in evading sanctions.

* * *

As CNN reminds us, Trump’s speech last year was a “dark and blistering diatribe” that “cemented the notion that Trump would not adhere to presidential norms. Trump famously used last year’s speech to attack his many perceived enemies – from the press, to Democrats to the establishment more broadly – for trying to derail his administration.

CNN also notes that Trump is riding high as he prepares for the CPAC address: For example, the historic tax cuts that he recently signed into law are extremely popular among Republicans…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EPbLCP Tyler Durden

Turkish Warships Threaten To Sink Italian Drillship In Cypriot Waters

Amid escalating tensions between Cyprus and Turkey in the Mediterranean Sea, the two countries appear headed towards an inevitable resource war.

Just two weeks since we first reported on Turkey’s aggression in Cypriot waters, KeepTalkingGreece.com reports that a serious incident took place at 10 a.m. on Friday morning, when five Turkish warships threatened to sink the drillship  SAIPEM 12000 commissioned by the Italian energy company ENI.

The drillship had set out to reach block 3 of Cyprus’ Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in a new effort to reach Soupia target. SAIPEM could not reach its target due to Turkish threats.

According to Cypriot and Turkish media, the captain of one of the Turkish warships contacted the SAIPEM and threatened to sink the drill ship if it should not change its route. The drill ship changed the route and making maneuvers through the Turkish warships turned to the West and left the area.

screenshots form marinetraffic.com via newsit.cyprus

Deputy Government Spokesman Victoras Papadopoulos told the Cyprus News Agency, that after consultations between Italian company ENI and SAIPEM 12000, the captain of the drillship tried once again to drive the ship towards the Soupia  (Cuttlefish) target to conduct its drilling operations.

“During its course towards block 3 and the Soupia target the drillship was halted by five Turkish warships and after threats of violence launched (by the Turks) and the threat of a collision with the drillship, despite the courageous and commendable efforts made by the captain,” CNA notes.

The SAIPEM sailed to the port of Lemessos, is expected to sail to Morocco over the weekend.

Nikos Christodoulidis told media that the drilling is postponed but the energy program continues.

During the informal EU Summit in Brussels, Cyprus, Italy and Greece hope to find a solution to the problem with the aid of top European Union officials.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2CEdHvU Tyler Durden

Bank Of America: “Here Comes Lots Of Volatility”

Looking at last week’s “risk on” capital flows, BofA’s Michael Hartnett writes that according to EPFR data, there was a $13.2BN inflow into equities (split $7.5BN into ETFs and $5.7BN into mutual funds), $5.2BN in bonds, and $0.4BN in gold. This was a notable shift, because as the BofA CIO highlights, this was the 1st time since the Great Rotation of 2013, that equity inflows have outpaced bond inflows past 18 months.

Another surprising observation: the bulk of the flows have been deflationary, as a “higher growth/higher rates backdrop not reflected in other flows” as inflows continue to deflationary winners of tech (Chart 2), IG bonds, EM bonds/equities.

Going back to the original indicator which prompted BofA to – correctly – predict an imminent correction at the end of January, Hartnett writes that the bank’s proprietary Bull & Bear indicator remains stuck at 8.2.

In other words, just like Goldman’s pointed out earlier this week, this suggests that excess optimism continues on risk assets, thus the “pain trade for stocks & credit still to downside”; note however the coast is getting clearer for Emerging Markets, where the flow trading rule “sell signal” triggered on Feb 1st, now subsides back to neutral territory.

And speaking of BofA’s warnings, which last month was absolutely spot on in terms of both size and timing, here comes another.

First, Hartnett notes that in the battle between stagflation hawks vs. Goldilocks doves, if “as we suspect data is stagflationary/ policy hawkish” then “another risk-off bout coming.”

That was the first warning. The second: picking up where we left off in our discussion of shifting market correlations, Hartnett calculates that the recent 5 months of lower US dollar & higher US bond yields is an extremely rare event (<10% of past 50-year history, Table 1, though v common in Emerging Markets).

Traditionally, this has coincided with bouts of inflation and/or market volatility: on average inflation rose 2ppt, equities fell 9% and volatility rose 22ppt;

higher wages remains the obvious risk to investors; higher wages & peak profits/ growth much less anticipated.

Which bring us to the third, and final warning: brace yourselves for a burst in volatility, to wit:

Here comes vol: lots of volatility events in coming weeks: Feb 28th Powell @ Humphrey-Hawkins, March 1st US ISM, March 4th Italian elections/Merkel coalition vote, March 8th ECB, March 9th BoJ & US payroll/wages, March 21st FOMC.

How to position for the second round of the vol surge? Here are BofA’s preferred risk off trades.

Risk-off trades: best trades to play further risk unwind in Q1; long US dollar, long volatility, short credit, short tech, short EM, i.e. further unwind of big 2018 consensus positions

If BofA’s recent track record is indicative, it’s about to get very stormy out there.

But the most exciting thing about BofA doubling down on its gloomy forecast is that it now squarely pits two of the most popular/followed analysts against each other: one on hand, BofA’s Michael Hartnett who see pain, and on the other JPM’s Marko Kolanovic, who as we reported yesterday, sees only blue skies ahead.  One of the two is about suffer a painful hit to their reputation.

d

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2CEx5sH Tyler Durden