OECD Warns UK Faces Housing Bubble

The U.K. faces a housing-market bubble unless the government boosts the supply of new homes, the OECD warned yesterday. U.K. home values have climbed 36.6% since 2004, the seventh-biggest rise among OECD nations and back near their 2007/8 bubble highs. The Bank of England said last week mortgage approvals had surpassed 60,000-a-month six months earlier than it had predicted. As Bloomberg’s Niraj Shah notes, while the OECD raised its forecasts for U.K. economic growth, it said risks to the recovery include “vigorous” house-price increases that may curtail affordability. We are sure this will all end well – a speculative real estate bubble as the key driver of nominal economic growth? What could go wrong?… Is it any wonder that UK realtors see the crash coming and are asking the government to step back from this policy-induced euphoria?

 

 

Chart: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/lWY3qo_cAf8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

What "Car Salesman" Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

From Simon Black of Sovereign Man

What Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

Last night I attended a private function put on by the National Economists Club where the guest of honor was none other than Ben Bernanke. You can read his full speech to the attendees here.

Meanwhile, I’m still trying to figure out how a guy with my views was even allowed in the room. 

But since I was already scheduled to be in the US this week to speak at a conference in Miami, I jumped at the chance to enjoy Bistro Filet and economic doublethink.

I’ve always wanted to find out for myself– does this man actually believe that printing money is the path to prosperity?

As it turns out, he does believe it.

At one point during the evening, when pressed about whether his Quantitative Easing program was good for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, he flat out denied it, saying that such a premise is “simply not true”.

He defended his printing $85 billion per month, suggesting that fixing interest rates at zero is beneficial for society because, among other things, it allows people to ‘buy cars’.

I saw these words coming out of his mouth and thought to myself, “Is this guy f’ing serious?” Cars. Wow. As if going into debt to purchase a rapidly depreciating consumer item is somehow a victory for the people.

Fixing interest rates at zero screws responsible people who save.

My mother, for example, is completely risk averse. She holds the entirety of her savings in a bank account, and nobody can convince her otherwise.

What she doesn’t realize is that the interest rate she receives is below the rate of inflation. So year after year, the purchasing power of her savings declines.

This point seemed completely lost on the Chairman.

He also dismissed the Fed’s role in the growing wealth gap here in the Land of the Free.

As we’ve discussed before, recently published data show that the US wealth gap is at its highest point since 1929.

For this, the chairman blames trade globalization, saying that the wealth gap is a ‘complicated phenomenon’.

He also stated flat out that there’s ‘not much the Federal Reserve can do about long-term trends like [the wealth gap] that don’t have much to do with monetary policy.’

Right. Keeping interest rates at zero so that bankers and the ultra-wealthy can see their portfolios rise to record levels while the middle class gets hosed by rising costs of medical care, education, food, and fuel has nothing to do with monetary policy.

This may have been the most intellectually disingenuous thing I heard all night.

Mr. Bernanke also made it quite clear that they were going to keep printing no matter what.

In his own words, he told the story about how they had tried issuing forward guidance… first suggesting that Quantitative Easing would last through 2013. Then they changed it to 2014. Then 2015.

Finally they changed the target altogether, announcing that they had set a threshold for the unemployment rate of 6.5%… but that this figure was just a ‘threshold’, not a ‘trigger’.

In other words, even if the official unemployment rate moves below 6.5%, the Fed isn’t going to end QE. They will at that point START to look at other data, like the Labor Force Participation Rate (which is at its worst level since 1978).

He also hinted that their unemployment threshold was not set in stone… which I took as a sign that they would probably lower this threshold even more, paving the way for several more years of printing.

And even if they do let up on Quantitative Easing, he stated very plainly that the Fed would still likely keep its target interest rate at zero.

Bottom line, it’s not going to end… at least, not voluntarily. It’s going to take a full-blown currency crisis before the Fed gets a whiff of reality. 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ZSWJ54jrdaA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

What “Car Salesman” Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

From Simon Black of Sovereign Man

What Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

Last night I attended a private function put on by the National Economists Club where the guest of honor was none other than Ben Bernanke. You can read his full speech to the attendees here.

Meanwhile, I’m still trying to figure out how a guy with my views was even allowed in the room. 

But since I was already scheduled to be in the US this week to speak at a conference in Miami, I jumped at the chance to enjoy Bistro Filet and economic doublethink.

I’ve always wanted to find out for myself– does this man actually believe that printing money is the path to prosperity?

As it turns out, he does believe it.

At one point during the evening, when pressed about whether his Quantitative Easing program was good for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, he flat out denied it, saying that such a premise is “simply not true”.

He defended his printing $85 billion per month, suggesting that fixing interest rates at zero is beneficial for society because, among other things, it allows people to ‘buy cars’.

I saw these words coming out of his mouth and thought to myself, “Is this guy f’ing serious?” Cars. Wow. As if going into debt to purchase a rapidly depreciating consumer item is somehow a victory for the people.

Fixing interest rates at zero screws responsible people who save.

My mother, for example, is completely risk averse. She holds the entirety of her savings in a bank account, and nobody can convince her otherwise.

What she doesn’t realize is that the interest rate she receives is below the rate of inflation. So year after year, the purchasing power of her savings declines.

This point seemed completely lost on the Chairman.

He also dismissed the Fed’s role in the growing wealth gap here in the Land of the Free.

As we’ve discussed before, recently published data show that the US wealth gap is at its highest point since 1929.

For this, the chairman blames trade globalization, saying that the wealth gap is a ‘complicated phenomenon’.

He also stated flat out that there’s ‘not much the Federal Reserve can do about long-term trends like [the wealth gap] that don’t have much to do with monetary policy.’

Right. Keeping interest rates at zero so that bankers and the ultra-wealthy can see their portfolios rise to record levels while the middle class gets hosed by rising costs of medical care, education, food, and fuel has nothing to do with monetary policy.

This may have been the most intellectually disingenuous thing I heard all night.

Mr. Bernanke also made it quite clear that they were going to keep printing no matter what.

In his own words, he told the story about how they had tried issuing forward guidance… first suggesting that Quantitative Easing would last through 2013. Then they changed it to 2014. Then 2015.

Finally they changed the target altogether, announcing that they had set a threshold for the unemployment rate of 6.5%… but that this figure was just a ‘threshold’, not a ‘trigger’.

In other words, even if the official unemployment rate moves below 6.5%, the Fed isn’t going to end QE. They will at that point START to look at other data, like the Labor Force Participation Rate (which is at its worst level since 1978).

He also hinted that their unemployment threshold was not set in stone… which I took as a sign that they would probably lower this threshold even more, paving the way for several more years of printing.

And even if they do let up on Quantitative Easing, he stated very plainly that the Fed would still likely keep its target interest rate at zero.

Bottom line, it’s not going to end… at least, not voluntarily. It’s going to take a full-blown currency crisis before the Fed gets a whiff of reality. 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ZSWJ54jrdaA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

It's Bullard's Turn To Pour Cold Water On Stock Ramp, Says December Taper Possible, Considers Negative Rates As Well

First it was Carl Icahn, then Larry Fink, and now it is Fed “bellwether” Bullard who take the ECB’s NIRP and doubles down with a “Taper”… and NIRP

  • BULLARD SAYS THINGS ARE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS JOBS PICTURE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS QUESTION IS WHETHER JOBS PICKUP SUSTAINABLE
  • BULLARD SAYS A STRONG JOBS REPORT FOR NOVEMBER WOULD INCREASE PROSPECT TO TAPER IN BOND BUYING IN DECEMBER

Yeah, everyone is falling for that one again. Sure. For now however, EURUSD is buying it, and is down 100 pips on the combined action of the NIRP rumor and the possibilty of a December Taper.

 

But the punchline in the aftermath of the ECB rumor on just this is that the Fed just doubled down on the ECB’s ownc currency war gambit:

  • BULLARD WOULD LIKE STUDY OF NEGATIVE RATE FOR EXCESS RESERVES

In other words, it will soon cost everyone to keep money with the bank. As for NIRP on reserves: will banks consider lending out reserves if they have to pay a whopping 25 bps on amounts when they can use the same reserves as deposit-based collateral to buy ES and generate 20% annual returns via the S&P? Why no. They would not.

Finally, we would like to clarify that we were only joking when last night we tweeted that …


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/S4FA7JwQp8s/story01.htm Tyler Durden

It’s Bullard’s Turn To Pour Cold Water On Stock Ramp, Says December Taper Possible, Considers Negative Rates As Well

First it was Carl Icahn, then Larry Fink, and now it is Fed “bellwether” Bullard who take the ECB’s NIRP and doubles down with a “Taper”… and NIRP

  • BULLARD SAYS THINGS ARE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS JOBS PICTURE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS QUESTION IS WHETHER JOBS PICKUP SUSTAINABLE
  • BULLARD SAYS A STRONG JOBS REPORT FOR NOVEMBER WOULD INCREASE PROSPECT TO TAPER IN BOND BUYING IN DECEMBER

Yeah, everyone is falling for that one again. Sure. For now however, EURUSD is buying it, and is down 100 pips on the combined action of the NIRP rumor and the possibilty of a December Taper.

 

But the punchline in the aftermath of the ECB rumor on just this is that the Fed just doubled down on the ECB’s ownc currency war gambit:

  • BULLARD WOULD LIKE STUDY OF NEGATIVE RATE FOR EXCESS RESERVES

In other words, it will soon cost everyone to keep money with the bank. As for NIRP on reserves: will banks consider lending out reserves if they have to pay a whopping 25 bps on amounts when they can use the same reserves as deposit-based collateral to buy ES and generate 20% annual returns via the S&P? Why no. They would not.

Finally, we would like to clarify that we were only joking when last night we tweeted that …


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/S4FA7JwQp8s/story01.htm Tyler Durden

EUR Collapses As ECB 'Strawmans' Negative Rates (Again)

Given our earlier comment on the collapse of European earnings, it is perhaps unsurprisng that the CEB is throwing everything at the problem of a strong EUR:

  • *ECB SAID TO WEIGH MINUS 0.1% DEPOSIT RATE IF MORE EASING NEEDED

Of course, we await the official denial but suspect this is nothing more than attempt to gauge market response to the policy idea (just as Draghi did in May). For now, EURUSD has dumped to 1.3480, and US equities are soaring…

Reaction:

 

 

Deja Vu:

  • May 2, 2013: DRAGHI SAYS ECB HAS OPEN MIND ON NEGATIVE DEPOSIT RATE

And the rapid response when the reaction was seen last time:

European Central Bank Governing Council Member Ewald Nowotny told CNBC on Friday that the markets over-interpreted ECB President Mario Draghi's comments on negative deposit rates at Thursday's press conference. "Well I think the markets over-interpreted this point. Of course, there is always some kind of technical discussion about it but there is no specific plan in that direction," Nowotny said in Bratislava. "I personally think this is something where one really has to analyze very carefully the effects, side effects, psychological effects so this is not something that is of relevance in the immediate future."

 

But Nowotny said this was a "very sensitive issue" that would need "much more information, much more analysis than we have available at this moment." He warned it could in fact dry up the flow of credit. "This is one of the possible outcomes," he said.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/bOn3xMGmnK0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

EUR Collapses As ECB ‘Strawmans’ Negative Rates (Again)

Given our earlier comment on the collapse of European earnings, it is perhaps unsurprisng that the CEB is throwing everything at the problem of a strong EUR:

  • *ECB SAID TO WEIGH MINUS 0.1% DEPOSIT RATE IF MORE EASING NEEDED

Of course, we await the official denial but suspect this is nothing more than attempt to gauge market response to the policy idea (just as Draghi did in May). For now, EURUSD has dumped to 1.3480, and US equities are soaring…

Reaction:

 

 

Deja Vu:

  • May 2, 2013: DRAGHI SAYS ECB HAS OPEN MIND ON NEGATIVE DEPOSIT RATE

And the rapid response when the reaction was seen last time:

European Central Bank Governing Council Member Ewald Nowotny told CNBC on Friday that the markets over-interpreted ECB President Mario Draghi's comments on negative deposit rates at Thursday's press conference. "Well I think the markets over-interpreted this point. Of course, there is always some kind of technical discussion about it but there is no specific plan in that direction," Nowotny said in Bratislava. "I personally think this is something where one really has to analyze very carefully the effects, side effects, psychological effects so this is not something that is of relevance in the immediate future."

 

But Nowotny said this was a "very sensitive issue" that would need "much more information, much more analysis than we have available at this moment." He warned it could in fact dry up the flow of credit. "This is one of the possible outcomes," he said.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/bOn3xMGmnK0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Home Sales Plunge At Fastest Rate In 16 Months

It seems, despite the Fed’s efforts to unscamble the treasury complex’s eggs, that the rate shock of a taper/no-taper decision has become sticky in the housing market. With the fast money exiting, existing home sales missed expectations for the 4th month in a row – dropping to the lowest annualized number since June (very much against the trend in recent years). This is the biggest month-over-month drop in existing home sales since June 2012 but, of course, NAR has an excuse… “low inventory is holding back sales.” So, in other words, they could sell loads more houses if only there were more available for sale (or prices were lower…)…

This is not a “seasonal” thing… and in fact is very much against the seasonals of the last few years…

 

 

Via NAR,

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said a flattening trend is expected. “The erosion in buying power is dampening home sales,” he said. “Moreover, low inventory is holding back sales while at the same time pushing up home prices in most of the country. More new home construction is needed to help relieve the inventory pressure and moderate price gains.”

 

The median time on market for all homes was 54 days in October, up from 50 days in September, but well below the 71 days on market in October 2012. Short sales were on the market for a median of 93 days, while foreclosures typically sold in 46 days, and non-distressed homes took 53 days. Thirty-six percent of homes sold in October were on the market for less than a month.

 

Total housing inventory at the end of October declined 1.8 percent to 2.13 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 5.0-month supply at the current sales pace; the relative supply was 4.9 months in September. Unsold inventory is 0.9 percent above a year ago, when there was a 5.2-month supply.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/91dmTlIxZTg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

According To CBS Poll, Obama's Approval Rating Finally Catches Down With Dubya

Well that escalated quickly. Just a week ago we noted that President Obama’s approval rating trajectory was following an increasingly Dubya-esque route and sur eneough, today, a CBS poll shows that a mere 37% “approve” of the job Obama is doing. This is the same poor approval rating as Bush II’s second term at this time and perhaps more ironically comes only a month or so after he crowed of the Republicans’ collapsing polling results during the debt-ceiling debacle. In aggregate, as RealClearPolitics shows, Obama’s approval rating has collapsed to the lowest on record (and likewise his disapproval rating has soared). We await the next ‘distraction’ from the administration’s dismal state of affairs…

 

Simply out – it’s been a one-way street since the election.. Over-promise and under-deliver – the mantra of every 2nd term president…

 

Source: RealClearPolitics


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/I0LDSbSG5Sc/story01.htm Tyler Durden

According To CBS Poll, Obama’s Approval Rating Finally Catches Down With Dubya

Well that escalated quickly. Just a week ago we noted that President Obama’s approval rating trajectory was following an increasingly Dubya-esque route and sur eneough, today, a CBS poll shows that a mere 37% “approve” of the job Obama is doing. This is the same poor approval rating as Bush II’s second term at this time and perhaps more ironically comes only a month or so after he crowed of the Republicans’ collapsing polling results during the debt-ceiling debacle. In aggregate, as RealClearPolitics shows, Obama’s approval rating has collapsed to the lowest on record (and likewise his disapproval rating has soared). We await the next ‘distraction’ from the administration’s dismal state of affairs…

 

Simply out – it’s been a one-way street since the election.. Over-promise and under-deliver – the mantra of every 2nd term president…

 

Source: RealClearPolitics


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/I0LDSbSG5Sc/story01.htm Tyler Durden