Local Government Foils Evil Terrorist Entrepreneurs Once And For All

Authored by Simon Black via SovereignMan.com,

Tens of thousands of years ago, humankind was practically an endangered species.

Our early proto-ancestors had little means to protect against the harsh elements or defend against terrifying predators.

And finding enough food was a constant challenge.

Tribes of humans would roam from place to place, foraging for whatever they could eat until they had exhausted nature’s resources… and then be forced to move on to a new location.

And the idea that early humans were champion hunters is largely myth; we were scavengers for the most part, nibbling scraps off dead animal carcasses that had already been picked clean by predators higher up the food chain.

It was hardly a sustainable way to live.

Then everything changed around 10,000 years ago.

Our ancestors discovered that they could plant seeds in the ground and grow their own food. LOTS of food– far more than they could eat.

And that excess food could be invested– to support the labor of other members of the tribe to develop better tools and build structures… or to trade with other tribes for their surplus foods.

It was the first time ever that human beings enjoyed a regular surplus, where they could consistently produce more than they consumed.

I call this the Universal Law of Prosperity: consistently producing more than you consume.

And if our early ancestors had not discovered this simple principle, we would likely all still be squatting in the wilderness.

The Universal Law of Prosperity applies to everyone equally– whether proto-humans, modern day individuals, nation states, businesses, etc.

And it’s easy to understand: if you spend more than you earn, sooner or later you’re going to run into serious trouble.

We talk about this a lot in our regular conversations– there are so many violations of this principle everywhere you look.

Some of the most popular companies in the world these days burn through cash, consistently spending far more than they earn.

Governments are in debt up to their eyeballs, blowing trillions of dollars on programs they cannot afford.

And too many individuals are living way beyond their means, consuming far more than they produce.

In most of the West– and ESPECIALLY in the Land of the Free– the entire system is designed for consumption.

Think about it: the United States is easily one of the best places in the world to be a consumer.

US consumers can buy almost anything they want. They have access to the finest brands, the best restaurants, the largest malls and markets.

They can order anything online and get same day delivery. Soon drones will float down from the heavens to deliver boxes straight to their doorsteps.

And there is no shortage of banks and finance companies willing to step up and offer US consumers endless quantities of debt.

After all, why bother saving up for anything when you can indulge now and push off the consequences into the future?

Yes, the United States has consumption down to a science. And sadly this has become the most critical component of the US economy.

Economists fret over how much consumers spend during the holiday season; as they say, ‘the US consumer drives the economy.’

That’s kind of a pathetic statement. No one ever says the US producer drives the economy. Or the US entrepreneur drives the economy.

That’s probably because governments make it harder and harder to be productive.

One ridiculous example is Louisville, Kentucky – where hardworking entrepreneurs are being punished for the egregious crime of selling food to hungry people.

They’re specifically targeting mobile food trucks– the guys who sell hot dogs and burgers on the street.

A few years ago Louisville’s local government tried to ban them altogether, but lost in a lawsuit.

Now the city has recently put forth new rules requiring mobile food trucks to relocate at least 250 feet every TEN MINUTES.

And they would only be allowed to operate during daylight hours… forced to shutter when the sun goes down like some bizarre zombie apocalypse.

I can just imagine what nefarious entrepreneurial terrorist plot these do-good bureaucrats think they’re foiling with such heavy regulations.

And I’m sure the fine citizens of Louisville will sleep easier knowing that the sweet sound of the Ice Cream Man will fall silent at sundown.

Another example– just last week, the New York Police Department raided multiple apartment buildings, issuing 27 citations for suspicion of Airbnb rentals.

Well it’s about damn time these vile criminals were brought to justice.

Imagine the nerve of some owners who actually felt entitled to rent out their own private properties to supplement their incomes in one of the most expensive cities in the world while simultaneously providing cost effective lodging options for out-of-town travelers.

I truly hope that world leaders can come together in a new Coalition of the Willing to defeat this evil scourge once and for all.

It’s the same everywhere you look.

Want to start a business? File a bunch of forms, apply for permits, deal with bureaucracy.

As we’ve talked about before, most states in the Land of the Free require absurd and costly licensing requirements for even simple occupations like being a locksmith or house painter.

That’s the whole point: it’s easy to consume… difficult to produce.

It’s easy to go into debt. It’s difficult to save.

(Just think– how much does your bank pay in interest? 0.03%? Even if you’re lucky enough to be productive and save money, the return is pitiful.)

All this is literally the opposite of what it takes to create prosperity.

This isn’t rocket science. If everything in the system favors consumption over production, debt over savings, it’s pretty easy to see where that trend eventually leads.

*  *  *

And to continue learning how to ensure you thrive no matter what happens next in the world, I encourage you to download our free Perfect Plan B Guide.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2PYxTDl Tyler Durden

“It Was All A Lie”: Homeless Vet, NJ Couple Charged In $400,000 GoFundMe Grift

A feel-good story about a New Jersey couple who raised over $400,000 to help a homeless good Samaritan – before they pilfered his GoFundMe account – was all a scam, a prosecutor said Thursday. 

39-year-old Mark D’Amico (left), 28-year-old Kate McClure (center) and 35-year-old Johnny Bobbitt (right) are facing theft and conspiracy charges.

Kate McClure, 28, Mark D’Amico, 39, and drug-addicted homeless veteran Johnny Bobbitt, 35, were charged with theft by deception and conspiracy to commit theft by deception, after the three concocted a story that Bobbitt had given McClure his last $20 after her car ran out of fuel, leaving her stranded on the side of I-95 in a dangerous Philadelphia neighborhood. 

In numerous media appearances, McClure claimed she was driving to meet a friend in September 2017 when she ran out of gas around midnight on the I-95 exit ramp near Philadelphia and Bobbitt, who was sleeping under a nearby overpass, came to her rescue. She claimed Bobbitt spent his last $20 to buy her gas.

I pulled over to the side of the road as far as I could and I was going to get out and walk to the nearest gas station because it was not that far away, and that’s when I met Johnny,” McClure said last November in a “Good Morning America” interview. “He walked up and he said, ‘Get back in the car. Lock the doors. I’ll be back.’ I was just like, ‘OK.’” –ABC

They said they wanted to “pay it forward,” and established a GoFundMe campaign with an initial goal of raising $10,000. After the story went viral, the three raised $403,000

The net proceeds were $360,000 after fees, which went into an acount controlled by McClure. Bobbitt received approximately $75,000 of it according to Burlington County Prosecutor Scott Coffina.

“The entire campaign was predicated on a lie,” said Coffina during a Thursday news conference. “Less than an hour after the GoFundMe campaign went live McClure, in a text exchange with a friend, stated that the story about Bobbitt assisting her was fake,” he said. 

In one of the texts read by Coffina, McClure allegedly wrote to a friend, “Ok, so wait, the gas part is completely made up but the guy isn’t. I had to make something up to make people feel bad. So, shush about the made up stuff.” –ABC

After the story went sideways – and reports emerged that the couple had pilfered most of the money meant for Bobbitt, police raided McClure and D’Amico’s home looking for evidence in the case, and seizing a BMW they bought with charitable donations. 

Bobbitt, meanwhile, lawyered up and has alleged that the couple committed fraud and conspiracy by taking large amounts of the donations to “enjoy a lifestyle they could not afford” and using the account as “their personal piggy bank.” Bobbitt’s attorney, Chris Fallon, asked a judge to appoint a supervisor to manage the money in the fundraising account.

He said the money is all gone, most of it squandered by McClure and D’Amico on gambling, numerous luxury handbags, a New Year’s trip to Las Vegas and a BMW. The couple also used the donated funds to pay back $9,000 they owed to relatives. –ABC

Confina said that if Bobbitt hadn’t sued, the three might have gotten away with the scam

D’Amico and McClure turned themselves in on Wednesday, according to WPVI, while Bobbitt was arrested separately Wednesday night by the Philadelphia Police Department on charges of being a fugitive from justice – and is expected to be extradited to Burlington County to face charges. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2FqereD Tyler Durden

Dallas Taxpayers Are Shelling Out $725,000 to Defend an Ex-Cop Who Shot an Unarmed Teen

The Dallas City Council yesterday approved $150,000 in legal fees to defend an ex-cop who shot an unarmed man almost five years ago. The city has now spent more than $700,000 in taxpayer money to fight a civil lawsuit against former Senior Corporal Amy Wilburn.

Then-19-year-old Kelvion Walker was a passenger in what police believed to be a stolen car back in 2013. Dash camera footage shows the incident unfolding:

Police chase the vehicle until the driver, later identified as Reginald Robertson, slows down, jumps out, and runs away. While other officers follow the fleeing driver on foot, Wilburn approaches the car. She pulls out her gun and fires a shot, hitting Walker in the stomach.

Walker was unarmed at the time. He also says his hands were up, a claim that was backed up by a witness. “She gets surprised by Kelvion and pulls her gun and in a split second fires the shot,” Wilburn’s defense attorney, Robert Rogers, told The Dallas Morning News.

The car, meanwhile, had indeed been stolen. Walker claims he was unaware of that fact, and he has not been charged with a crime. Robertson, though, was sentenced to 14 years behind bars “for aggravated robbery and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle,” according to the Morning News.

In the weeks following the shooting, Wilburn was fired from the police force. After being charged with felony aggravated assault, Wilburn pleaded down in May to recklessly firing her gun, a misdeamnor.

Walker, however, has also filed an $8 million federal lawsuit against Wilburn, claiming “grisly disfigurement, and permanent debilitating and humiliating injuries.” According to his attorney, he’s had to undergo three major surgeries as a result of the shooting.

“It’s tough,” Walker told CBS DFW. “It’s real tough, financially, physically, and mentally.”

The suit won’t go to trial until February. But the city, which is responsible for defending Wilburn, has already racked up $725,000 in legal bills. That’s more than Dallas has ever spent on outside legal fees for a case of officer misconduct, CBS DFW reports.

The city’s Office of Public Affairs and Outreach did not respond to Reason‘s request for comment. Reason has previously written about how police misconduct costs taxpayers millions of dollars in settlements for civil suits.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2TgwKWD
via IFTTT

Stocks Swing On Headline Chaos As Cable Clobbered & Credit Cracked

Another day, another headline-driven chaos ride…

China was higher overnight…

European stocks fell with Italy leading the charge…

 

US Stocks bounced around 1pmET on reports of a trade truce from USTR Lighthizer…then sank a little on Ross comments…and then dropped again after Lighthizer’s office denied reports of a trade truce…

 

Futures show a relatively uneventful night and then all hell broke loose…

 

On the week, Trannies are the only index in the green…

 

Retailers fell for the 5th day in a row…

 

Banks bounced… barely… (aprt from JPM which outperformed)

 

Credit markets have begun to seriously crack…

 

 

Treasury yields ended the day lower…with the belly once again outperforming

 

 

The Dollar ended lower after a big surge (as cable tumbled) overnight – chaotic trading in the USD but the pattern seems quite clear – buying overnight (dollar shortage) selling in US…

 

Yuan extended its gains on the week…

 

Cable had an ugly day after May pitched her Brexit deal…

 

Bitcoin Cash – amid its Fork – plunged further on the week, Bitcoin was relatively stable after yesterday’s crash…

 

Dollar weakness helped commodities hold on to gains…

 

WTI Crude managed a small gain for the 2nd day in a row…

 

The big ugly in the energy complex gave some back today…

 

Finally, Eurodollar curves suggest the market is rejecting Fed tightening almost entirely… 1.5 hikes in 2018 and actual rate cuts priced in for now for 2020 and 2021…

And based on the ongoing tightness of financial conditions, S&P should be trading notably lower…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2QLbpCS Tyler Durden

California’s Deadliest Fire Now Blocking Sun; Temps Drop By 10 Degrees As “Hazardous” Air Chokes Residents

California’s deadliest fire in state history has generated so much smoke that it’s blotting out the sun – which has caused surface temperatures to drop by as much as 10 degrees Farenheit, according to the US National Weather Service. 

The smoke from the Camp Fire, which has burned 140,000 acres, claimed at least 56 lives, and is 40% contained, is so bad that anyone in the cities of Chico or Gridley who venture outdoors without a surgical-grade respirator are putting themselves in danger, according to Bloomberg

Current air quality across much of the region is very poor. Check with https://t.co/XYTBpMFjzh and your local air quality board for more information. #CAwx pic.twitter.com/Rao8t4gvwD

— NWS Sacramento (@NWSSacramento) November 15, 2018

The air in the immediate vicinity of the fire is considered “hazardous” — the worst it can be — and the poorest in the U.S. AirNow has an “unhealthy” rating for the air from Sacramento to Livermore, and it’s only a little better for San Francisco.

The smoke is so thick “it prevents the sunlight from reaching the surface,” said Hannah Chandler-Cooley, a National Weather Service meteorologist in Sacramento. “It prevents surface heating.” –Bloomberg

The poor air quality is expected to stick around through next week before the weather patterns shift – which will potentially blow smoke to the East, Chandler-Cooley told Bloomberg by telephone. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2QJe9AL Tyler Durden

Shocking Nat Gas Price Swings Prompt “Emergency Action” By CME

Yesterday’s furious short squeeze in natural gas has seen an equal and opposite sell off today, with Natgas now unchanged from before yesterday’s sharp ramp that sent the front contract higher by 20% only to see a 15% drop today.

In addition to pairing of positions, Thursday’s decline was likely exacerbated by a report showing that producers had injected 39 billion cubic feet of gas into underground storage last week, higher than consensus estimates, bringing total stocks to 3.247tn cu ft. Still, stocks remained at the lowest level for this time of year since 2005, leaving the market vulnerable to fears about a weather-induced shortfall.

While the catalyst behind the furious spike has yet to be confirmed, the severity of the price action prompted analysts and traders to speculate if one or more hedge funds were liquidating positions during a frantic week in global energy markets that saw gains for gas as crude oil prices took a dive.

As we noted yesterday, the recent turmoil in the two commodities was likely due to a massive bearish positions in gas offset by longs in crude oil and “the unwinding of positions in one of these two commodities could potentially have triggered the opposite effect on the other commodity,” Citigroup said.

Indeed, as shown in the chart below, the 2-week rate of change in natgas vs WTI was the highest going back nearly 15 years.

And as Bloomberg reported, for nat gas traders, Wednesday’s price rally was so extreme that some were left comparing it to the turmoil that followed the notorious Amaranth blow-up 12 years ago. Gas futures rocketed up as much as 20 percent while  there was an even bigger surge in the so-called widowmaker spread between two longer-dated contracts — in effect a play on how big stockpiles will be at the end of winter. It’s the dramatic move in the spread that’s leading observers to draw parallels with the 2006 implosion of hedge fund Amaranth Advisors, which lost $6.6 billion following wrong-way nat gas trades by Brian Hunter. While so far there’s no suggestion of losses of that magnitude this time around, the gyrations set commodities markets abuzz.

Whatever the reason behind the trade unwind, the CME took what it called “emergency action” to widen price  fluctuation limits for eight nat gas futures contracts “in light of recent natural gas price movements.”

Meanwhile, volumes of benchmark Henry Hub natural gas futures on the Nymex were a record 1.6 contracts on Wednesday, more than four times the average. In fact, as the Financial Times reported, the volume was so ferocious that an ETN allowing retail investors to place leveraged bets on lower natural gas prices was more heavily traded than even the SPY, the world’s biggest ETF with $255bn of assets and the most traded equity security on the planet.

What is notable is that the move in nat gas was so powerful, it nearly caused a VIXtermination-type event in the VelocityShares Daily 3X Inverse Natural Gas ETN, which seeks to produce three times the opposite daily move of US natural gas prices and is known by its stock market ticker DGAZ.

Derivatives strategist Pravit Chintawongvanich, who rose to popularity with his hourly hot takes during the February VIXplosion that anihilated several inverse VIX ETNs, pointed out that DGAZ and its “long” leveraged cousin UGAZ could be liquidated if natural gas prices move sharply: “Because these products offer 3x daily leverage, a one day move greater than 33 per cent in either direction would blow up one of them,” he wrote.

In other words, the market was this close to another inverse ETN extinction event, only this time not in volatility but in natural gas. Meanwhile, the DGAZ’s days may be limited: starting off the month with $500MM in assets, in just two weeks it has been cut in half, and as of this morning had just $247MM in assets.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2B9o5hD Tyler Durden

Private Train Cars, Murder Task Forces, Captain Kirk: Cities Offered Amazon Some Weird Shit

Amazon will build its new corporate headquarters in Queens, New York, and Arlington, Virginia, after conducting a months-long bidding process that at one point had literally hundreds of American and Canadian cities trying to to woo the retail and web services giant with taxpayer-funded givaways large and small.

In the end, it looks like Amazon picked New York and Virginia for strategic and symbolic reasons that go beyond the specific goodies promised by policymakers in either place.

Of course, there are still plenty of goodies. New York will give Amazon more than $1.5 billion in tax breaks, let the company do whatever it wants with the land it will occupy in Long Island City (good luck dodging city codes if you’re a small business in Brooklyn), and it will build a private helicopter pad for Amazon executives to use. Sadly, Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo won’t be following through on his promise to change his name to “Amazon Cuomo.”

But in picking New York and Virginia, Amazon left some of the more bizarre offers on the table—many of which Buzzfeed highlighted in a story published Thursday.

Atlanta, for example, would have given Amazon executives a private lounge in Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport and offered to rename a major street “Alexa Way” after the Amazon in home spying device digital personal assitant. The city also promised Amazon a private car on each train running through the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) system, as a way to “distribute products around the city.”

Personally, I’m surprised Atlanta didn’t promise to let Amazon executives have exclusive access to the city’s streetcar-to-nowhere, since no one rides that thing anyway.

Not to be outdone, Chicago offered Amazon more than $2 billion in tax breaks and grants. But every city and state has plenty of other peoples’ money to burn on crony capitalism, it seems, so Chicago tried to sweeten its pitch with the original Captain Kirk. Yes, William Shatner provided the voice-over to the city’s over-produced-but-underwhelming video message that failed to mention anything uniquely interesting about Chicago except that it once had a big fire. Seriously, if you ignore the one line about the fire, Shatner’s voiceover could be describing any metropolitian area in the whole country.

We don’t know how much Chicago spent on marketing itself to Amazon, but hopefully this video cost less than the cool half-million dollars Philadelphia spent on advertising itself, also unsuccessfully.

Columbus, Ohio, probably wins the prize for the weirdest promise made to Amazon. On top of a half-billion dollar subsidy and 100 percent property tax abatement, Ohio’s capital city pledged to create a special task force to reduce its “unacceptable murder rate.”

This was probably an attempt to smooth over any concerns Amazon’s bosses might have had about locating in a place where the mayor had recently declared that too many people were getting killed. But residents and business owers in Columbus might be left wondering why reducing the murder rate would be tied to Amazon deciding to move there—and not the wellbeing of people who live there now (and are being murdered). With Amazon heading elsewhere, is Columbus going to invest fewer resources in reducing murders than it otherwise would have?

There’s an important lesson here. City officials ought to put more effort into creating a strong local economy that makes people and businesses want to locate there. That means doing things like trying to limit how many people get murdered in your city, yes, but also in not doing dumb things, like wasting tax dollars on silly streetcars. Cities taxing and regulating the living daylights out of incumbent businesses and local entrepeneurs while offering special deals to corporate behemoths is an affront to the people who invested themselves without first demanding an exception. Cities should be looking to create a tax and regulatory climate that allows all residents and businesses to prosper, rather than cutting special deals that free major corporations from high taxes, oppressive land use policies, or restrictive zoning rules.

The real “winners” in the Amazon sweepstakes are places that decided not to play, like San Antonio, Texas. “We have a competitive toolkit of incentives, but blindly giving away the farm isn’t our style,” San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg wrote in an open letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos last year. Or Toronto, which submitted a bid for the HQ2 but declined to offer any special economic development schemes. “Frankly, we feel we don’t need to play that game,” Toby Lennox, the CEO of Toronto Global, an organization that promotes the city’s business community, told the CBC.

The politicians in those places won’t win any special accolades for “creating jobs”—or “buying jobs,” as The Wall Street Journal editorial board says of deals like the ones Amazon struck in New York and Virginia. Doing the right thing won’t get their names in splashy newspaper stories or lead to a press conferences with the world’s richest man.

Fostering a vibrant economy that allows businesses of every shape and size to prosper should be its own reward. Especially since that’s the kind of place businesses should want to go.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2K5rp0h
via IFTTT

Mueller Investigation “Not In Jeopardy” Says Lindsey Graham After Meeting With Acting AG Whitaker

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has been assured by Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker that he will not fire special counsel Robert Mueller, according to The Hill

Graham and Whitaker met Thursday afternoon in the Senator’s Russel Building office, where Whitaker – who replaced ousted AG Jeff Sessions, said he doesn’t see anything wrong with Mueller’s probe. 

As to the Mueller investigation, I’m confident that it is not in jeopardy,” Graham said following their meeting, adding that Whitaker doesn’t think that Mueller’s probe has exceeded any DOJ guidelines. 

“There’s no reason to fire him. I asked him, ‘Do you have any reason to [fire] Mr. Mueller? He said he has zero reason to believe anything is being done wrong with the Mueller investigation,” said Graham, recalling the conversation. 

“There’s a regular-order process where the special counsel makes requests to the deputy attorney general and the attorney general. That’s the way the system works,” added Graham, who explained that Mueller has obtained the necessary signatures from various senior Justice Department officials throughout various stages of his investigation. 

Graham has co-authored legislation that would protect the special counsel from being fired without good cause. 

The bill codifies existing Department of Justice regulations requiring that a special counsel only be fired with proper justification by a senior Senate-confirmed Justice Department official.

Trump appointed Whitaker to replace Sessions the day after the midterm elections. He has not undergone Senate confirmation to the position. –The Hill

Whitaker’s appointment has received massive backlash from Democrats, who have pointed to comments he has made regarding the scope of Mueller’s investigation – seemingly in stark contrast to what he has told Graham. 

In a Sunday letter signed by Democratic lawmakers Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Jerry Nadler, Dianne Feinstein, Adam Schiff, Mark Warner and Elijah Cummings, Whitaker should be disqualified from taking control of the special counsel investigation over comments he made in June and July, 2017. 

Mr. Whitaker has a history of hostile statements toward Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation, including televised statements suggesting the investigation be defunded or subjected to strict limitations in scope,” reads the letter, pointing first to a June 9, 2017 statement by Whitaker during an appearance on a radio show in which he said “There is no criminal obstruction of justice charge to be had here. The evidence is weak. No reasonable prosecutor would bring a case.” 

Then, in a July 26, 2017 statement, Whitaker said that he “could see a scenario where Jeff Sessions is replaced with a recess appointment and that attorney general doesn’t fire Bob Mueller but he just reduces his budget so low that his investigations grinds almost to a halt.

The letter goes on to note that Whitaker has referred to the special counsel investigation as “a mere witch hunt,” as well as an opinion article he wrote entitled “Mueller’s Investigation of Trump Is Going Too Far.” 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2DGrEyb Tyler Durden

Stocks Slammed After Ross Says US Still Plans 25% China Tariffs In January

Easy come, easy go.

As we reported earlier, shortly after noon ET stocks surged after the FT reported the USTR’s Lighthizer has told some industry executives the next tranche of levies were already on hold.

The FT cited Chris Johnson, a former CIA China analyst now at the CSIS think-tank, who said the US and China remained “at risk of being stuck” because there was insufficient time before the G20 to reach a broad agreement.

“There is no possibility of a truly comprehensive deal, and that is a good thing because the issues are so complex,” said Mr Johnson. “There is still the possibility of some kind of a framework agreement, where we do something like freezing the current tariffs and empowering the negotiators.”

Such an outcome, the FT reported, would mean US tariff rates on more than $200bn of Chinese goods would remain at 10 per cent instead of rising to 25 per cent in January as planned. As long as negotiations continued, the US would also refrain from putting levies on another $267bn of goods, which Mr Trump has threatened.

The news prompted a furious bounce in the S&P, which after trading down as low as 2,671, jumped as high as 2,736.

However, it was not meant to be, and seemingly in response to the FT story which hinted at a detente in the trade wars, moments US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross was quoted by Bloomberg saying that the US is still planning to raise tariffs on Chinese imports to 25%, negating the FT report.

  • ROSS: U.S. STILL PLANS CHINA TARIFF INCREASE TO 25% IN JANUARY

In kneejerk response, the Dow tumbled nearly 100 points, with the S&P trimming much of its gains on the day

Since then, however, upward momentum algos appear to have regained control and the Dow is almost back to unchanged since the Ross headline, as markets realized that the rising tariff – which was announced in September – is due to rise in January, however that plan can change after the Xi-Trump meeting which has yet to be held.

Meanwhile, doubling down on the anti-detente, Reuters cited a US official who said that China’s trade offer to the US – referring to the letter sent by Beijing to Trump which we discussed yesterday – should be viewed with skepticism.

  • CHINA’S TRADE OFFER TO U.S. SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH SKEPTICISM – U.S. OFFICIAL
  • CHINA’S TRADE OFFER COVERS 142 ITEMS INCLUDING ISSUES BEIJING IS WILLING TO ADDRESS AND ISSUES IT CONSIDERS OFF LIMITS – U.S. OFFICIAL: RTRS

Either the market has yet to react to this latest set of headlines, or both humans and algos no longer even care about the constant noise coming out from the tape.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Q4ISeq Tyler Durden

US Has Spent $5,900,000,000,000 On War Since 2001

Authored by Jason Ditz via AntiWar.com,

A new report from Brown University is aiming to provide a close estimate of the cost of the overall cost to the US government of its myriad post-9/11 wars and assorted global wars on terror. The estimate is that $5.933 trillion has been spent through fiscal year 2019.

This is, of course, vastly higher than official figures, owing to the Pentagon trying to oversimplify the costs into simply overseas contingency operations. It is only when one considers the cost of medical and disability care for soldiers, and future such costs, along with things like the interest on the extra money borrowed for the wars, that the true cost becomes clear.

That sort of vast expenditure is only the costs and obligations of the wars so far, and with little sign of them ending, they are only going to grow. In particular, a generation of wars is going to further add to the medical costs for veterans’ being consistently deployed abroad.

Starting in late 2001, the US has engaged in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Yemen, and elsewhere around the world. Many of those wars have become more or less permanent operations, with no consideration of ending them under any circumstances.

Those wishing to read the report can find it here.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Bag5wT Tyler Durden