Shares Of World’s Biggest Toymaker Crater After It Suspends Dividend

Shares of Mattel, the world’s biggest toymaker, cratered as much as 24% after hours after the company announced it would suspend its quarterly dividend starting in Q4, and instead use the cash to shore up its faltering business after a big hit following the bankruptcy of its largest retailer Toys‘R‘Us. A quarter of Mattel’s market cap was wiped out after earnings, which were disappointing even without the dividend news.  The suspension of its quarterly dividend of 15 cents a share is expected to save Mattel a modest $50 million per quarter.

”Our Q3 performance was clearly disappointing, led by compression in North America, driven by Toys‘R‘Us filing for bankruptcy, tighter retailer inventory management and challenges with certain underperforming brands,” Mattel’s CEO Margo Georgiadis said. Earlier in the year, Mattel had decided to cut its dividend payout by more than 60%, as part of a management overhaul that saw the replacement of the former CEO and veteran Finance Chief Kevin Farr last month. Georgiadis, who joined the company in February, plans to reduce expenses by $650 million over the next two years – up from a $200 million projection in June. Which means that in addition to the dividend cut, the company will be slashing headcount next.

Even before the dividend cut news, the company was poised for a tumble: net sales fell 13% to $1.56 billion in Q3, a huge miss to consensus estimates of $1.81bn, hurt by weak demand across its core categories such as Barbie, Hot Wheels, Thomas & Friends and Monster High. Meanwhile, after the Toys”R”Us bankruptcy, the bottom fell out of the company’s operations, and Mattel posted a net loss of $603.3 million, or $1.75 per share, in Q3 compared with a profit of $236.3 million, or 68 cents per share, a year ago.

Mattell blamed the Toys‘R‘Us bankruptcy, as well as higher freight expenses for Mattel’s gross margin collapse, which fell 7 percent in the quarter. The bankrupt toy retailer was the biggest distributor of Mattel product and contributed 11% to Mattel’s revenue in 2016; it owes over $135 million in the form of unsecured, prepetition claims to Mattel.

Earlier in the day, Mattel’s smaller rival Hasbro, which reported much better quarterly results, also said it expected a weaker holiday quarter, and pinned the blame to the toy retailer’s bankruptcy.

After today’s plunge, Mattel’s stock has dropped to the lowest level since the market’s lows in March 2009.

via http://ift.tt/2gML2jt Tyler Durden

Majority Of White Americans Say They Face Discrimination

A new NPR poll finds that a majority of white Americans believe they face discrimination in America today…

"If you apply for a job, they seem to give the blacks the first crack at it," said 68-year-old Tim Hershman of Akron, Ohio, "and, basically, you know, if you want any help from the government, if you're white, you don't get it. If you're black, you get it."

As NPR reports, more than half of whites – 55 percent – surveyed say that, generally speaking, they believe there is discrimination against white people in America today.

Hershman's view is similar to what was heard on the campaign trail at Trump rally after Trump rally. Donald Trump catered to white grievance during the 2016 presidential campaign and has done so as president as well.

50-year-old heavy equipment operator Tim Musick, who lives in Maryland, just outside Washington, D.C. says anti-white discrimination is real, but he doesn't think he has ever really felt it personally.

 "I think that you pretty much, because you're white, you're automatically thrown into that group as being a bigot and a racist and that somehow you perceive yourself as being more superior to everybody else, which is ridiculous," Musick said, speaking during his lunch break at a construction site.

 

"I'm just a man that happens to have been born white," Musick continued.

Notably, people from every racial or ethnic group surveyed said they believe theirs faces discrimination – from African-Americans and Latinos to Native Americans and Asian-Americans, as well as whites.

via http://ift.tt/2yMQuJZ Tyler Durden

Are Your Kids Too Fragile? New at Reason

Kids today are tagged, surveilled, and tracked like endangered species. Is it any wonder that our college campuses now rush to provide safe spaces and panic rooms to protect young adults from speakers and materials they might find disturbing?

To discuss the changes in American childhood—and what to do about them—Reason’s Nick Gillespie sat down with Lenore Skenazy, the author of Free-Range Kids: How to Raise Safe, Self-Reliant Children (Without Going Nuts with Worry) and a contributor to Reason.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2gMutE2
via IFTTT

Sessions Continues to Push ‘Gateway Drug’ Myth About Marijuana

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions continued his increasingly lonely crusade against marijuana today, warning that the U.S. has strayed too far from the “just say no” mantra of the 1980s, to our mortal peril.

In remarks this morning at the conservative Heritage Foundation, Sessions lamented the country’s increasing nonchalance about pot. “I do think this whole country needs to not be so lackadaisical about drugs. Much of the addiction starts with marijuana,” Sessions said. “It is not a harmless drug.” (Jacob Sullum’s comprehensive 2003 article on the “gateway drug” theory is here. In more recent developments, opioid overdoses in Colorado have fallen by six percent since the state legalized recreational marijuana, after 14 years of steady increases.)

Happily, Sessions’ concerns are increasingly falling on deaf ears, even in his own party. As Reason reported Wednesday, a new Gallup poll found record high support for marijuana legalization—including, for the first time, a majority of Republicans. According to the survey, 64 percent of all American adults, including 51 percent of Republicans, think the drug should be legal.

Sessions has always been a hardline supporter of the war on drugs, but a federal crackdown against states that have legalized marijuana for recreational and medicinal use has yet to materialize. In August, the Justice Department’s Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety did not recommend any major changes to the 2013 memo outlining a largely hands-off approach to marijuana enforcement in states that have legalized it.

However, in separate comments today during an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, Sessions said he still believes those states are in direct conflict with federal law, though he couldn’t comment on ongoing Justice Department investigations or pushback against state marijuana programs.

“I do not believe there is any argument that because a state legalizes marijuana that the federal law against marijuana is no longer existence,” he continued. “I do believe that the federal laws clearly are in effect in all 50 states and we will do our best to enforce the laws as we are required to do so.”

In lieu of putting the kibosh on state marijuana regimes, Sessions has called for a return to “just say no” anti-drug messaging of yesteryear. But as I wrote earlier this year, his nostalgia for the D.A.R.E. program does not quite square with the facts:

It’s more than a bit generous to attribute declining drug use to factors like the Justice Department’s devastating war on crack and commercials where the Ninja Turtles tell kids not to smoke reefer. Drug use among teens began declining around 1981, well before the creation of DARE and well before the Reagan administration’s amped-up war on narcotics, according to annual surveys by the Monitoring Our Future study.

Teen drug use continued to decline through the ’80s, but it started rising again in 1992, when D.A.R.E. was already ubiquitous in school curricula around the country. That rise leveled off around the end of the decade. Reported teen drug use fell and rose slightly again during the 2000s. And then, despite the lamentations of drug warriors like Sessions over the purported perils of marijuana legalization, it started dropping again in 2014.

The National Institutes of Health’s most recent annual survey of teenage drug use found marijuana use among teenage age groups either declined or remained steady in 2016, despite the increasing availability of legal marijuana.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2y9gwaK
via IFTTT

Where To Invest When (Almost) Everything’s In A Bubble

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Many things that are scarce and thus valuable cannot be bought on the global marketplace.

Now that almost every asset class is in a bubble, the question of where to invest one's capital has become particularly vexing. The ashes of wealth consumed by the 2008-09 Global Financial Meltdown are still warm, at least to those who never recovered, and so buying assets at nosebleed valuations in the hopes of earning another 5% aren't very compelling to anyone pursuing common-sense risk management.

As it happens, I wrote a whole book on this vexing question, An Unconventional Guide to Investing in Troubled Times.

I can't summarize all the ideas presented in the book in one brief blog entry, but some basic principles will serve us well when bubbles abound.

1. Risk cannot be disappeared, it can only be masked or transferred to others. When anyone claims an investment is low-risk, they're actually claiming either A) the risk has been obscured by fancy footwork or false claims, or B) the risk has been transferred to some mark, chump or bagholder–nowadays, that usually means the taxpayer, as profits are private and losses are socialized.

2. Value flows to what's scarce. As economist Michael Spence and his colleagues have noted, conventional capital–the kind issued by central banks and private banks–is not scarce and therefore has little value. Ditto for conventional labor. This is why the returns on conventional capital and labor are so low.

Spence et al. suggest that what's scarce in today's global economy are ideas that create new business models, new productivity tools and new goods/services: Labor, Capital, and Ideas in the Power Law Economy.

This suggests an investment strategy of identifying what's scarce, or what will soon be scarce, before everyone else.

3. Many things that are scarce and thus valuable cannot be bought on the global marketplace. The number one example of this is of course health, which is priceless because even having millions won't buy your health back when it's been lost.

Yes, you can get patched up with stents or costly meds or maybe score a black-market organ harvested from some unfortunate prisoner somewhere, but all this sort of thing merely keeps you alive; it doesn't actually restore health.

So any investment in health will pay extremely high dividends. It doesn't take a ton of cash to invest in one's health; most of the investment is behavioral.

Other examples of what can't be bought in the same way stocks, bonds and housing can be purchased: meaningful work, communities with a collective memory of how to get things done in the real world, a functioning community economy, etc.

Investing in work you find fulfilling and meaningful pays dividends that can't be bought on the marketplace. Once again, investing in one's skills and social/intellectual capital doesn't require much cash; thanks to YouTube University and many other free or low-cost sources, anyone can start acquiring the eight essential skills I lay out in my book Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy. The basic idea is to learn how to build your own career and job.

4. Comparing the relative value of various assets helps identify what's relatively overvalued and undervalued. The key word here is relative: to say something is absolutely undervalued is trickier than concluding something is undervalued compared to other asset classes.

For example, compare housing in the U.S. and global commodities. Based on the national Case-Shiller Index, house prices have reached new bubblicious levels. Thanks, Federal Reserve!

It's not much of a stretch to reckon that, hmm, valuations are looking a bit more likely to be overvalued here rather than undervalued.

Now ponder this chart of global commodity prices. It seems commodities are looking decidedly unbubblicious at these levels.

Many commentators have noted that commodities such as precious metals, agricultural products, fertilizers etc. are considerably lower than their recent peaks.

So one possible strategy here would be to sell that apartment complex you bought in Seattle that's doubled in value over the past few years and use the proceeds to start nibbling on some commodities that look beaten up, ignored, scorned or simply low in their historic range.

This doesn't mean commodities can't or won't go much lower, or the Seattle apartments can't or won't go much higher; remember, risk cannot be disappeared. It's an exercise in risk management, and making an assessment of what's more or less likely to happen over the next few years. It's an exercise in hedging gains by seeking exposure in assets that may become scarce and thus more valuable in the near future.

(This is not a recommendation to pursue this strategy; I mention it only as an example of the principle of comparing relative value.)

There's more in the book, have a look: here's the Intro and Chapter One, and the Amazon page: An Unconventional Guide to Investing in Troubled Times.

*  *  *

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com. Check out both of my new books, Inequality and the Collapse of Privilege ($3.95 Kindle, $8.95 print) and Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform ($3.95 Kindle, $8.95 print, $5.95 audiobook) For more, please visit the OTM essentials website.

via http://ift.tt/2yTwJQy Tyler Durden

Don’t Send Arms to Ukraine

Ukrainian politicians anticipate that the Trump administration will soon decide to send “lethal aid” to their country, which is embroiled in an armed conflict with Russia along its eastern border, Foreign Policy reports.

Sending arms to Ukraine would be a terrible idea. It would needlessly escalate tensions between Russia and the West while inviting Moscow to ramp up their own intervention in Ukraine.

The idea is one that the U.S. has avoided since the conflict began in 2014. Former Obama officials say they wanted to send lethal aid to Ukraine but were thwarted by Barack Obama and his national security advisor, Susan Rice. Abstaining from sending arms then “became the de facto policy, and then the urgency slipped away,” Max Bergmann, an Obama-era State Department official, told Foreign Policy.

Nevertheless, the U.S. spent $300 million on “non-lethal defense aid” to Ukraine in 2016 alone.

Last year, the Trump campaign worked to remove a plank from the GOP platform that called for sending lethal aid to Ukraine. That move, which made the GOP platform less bellicose and brought it in line with the Democrats’ stance on the matter of aid to Russia, was smeared as a “pro-Russia” move.

Not even European officials, who have a very vested interest in limiting the Russia’s influence in Eastern Europe, particularly support the idea of sending lethal arms to Ukraine.

Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany and the longest serving head of government in the European Union, has opposed arming Ukraine to fight Russia-backed separatists as far back as 2015.

European leaders were similarly wary of sanctions the U.S. imposed on Russia earlier this year, fearing such measures could put Europe’s energy supply at risk.

And that’s the crux of it: The U.S. has no vested national security interest in what happens in Ukraine. Regional players like the European Union do. If they decide arming Ukraine is in their best interest, they have the power to do so. The United States should not insert itself into the situation, not to “prove” the Trump administration isn’t beholden to the Kremlin nor to assert its dominance vis a vis Russia.

As a candidate, Trump appeared to understand the U.S. was involved in all kinds of international drama it had no business in. He should resist efforts within his administration to ramp up Washington’s involvement in other people’s conflicts.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2xqXHLT
via IFTTT

Amazon Soars Above $1,000 After Smashing Expectations

Amazon has done it again, and following a lukewarm second quarter and with Goldman warning not to get too excited going into earnings, Amazon is back to its short-crushing ways, reporting both revenues and EPS which blew away expectations.  In Q3, Amazon reported EPS of 52 cents, beating not only consensus estimates of 4 cents, but printing above the highest sellside estimate on net sales of $43.7 billion, also well above the $42.19 billion consensus estimate, entirely due to the contribution of AWS.  It was also above the high end of the company’s own range, which topped out at $41.75 but did not include Whole Foods, which deal closed on August 28.

The closely followed AWS segment reported net sales of $4.58 billion, a Y/Y growth of +42% (slightly less than the 43% Y/Y increase last quarter), and above the $4.51 billion expected. AMZN reported AWS operating income of $1.171 billion, which was a modest miss to the $1.1 billion expected. AWS margin in Q3 was 25.5%, fractionally below the 26.6% reported a year ago.

Putting AWS in context, whereas AMZN’s total operating income was $347 million in Q3, AWS $1.171 billion. In other words, the rest of the company lost $824 million. While the division has been facing tougher competition from both Microsoft and Google, prompting some concerns about whether the growth can continue on pace, especially amid price wars, so far it has yet to materialize despite a slowdown in revenue AWS growth.

Looking forward, AMZN sees the following solid revenue and operating income:

  • Net sales are expected to be between $56.0 billion and $60.5 billion, or to grow between 28% and 38% compared with fourth quarter 2016. This compares to sellside expectations of $58.75 billion. This guidance includes approximately 1,000 basis points of impact to our year-over-year growth rate from Whole Foods Market. This guidance also anticipates a favorable impact of approximately $1.2 billion or 270 basis points from foreign exchange rates.
  • Operating income is expected to be between $300 million and $1.65 billion, compared with $1.3 billion in fourth quarter 2016. Sellside called for $1.85 billion so a little weak here.

Jeff Bezos was as usual, quite optimistic:

“In the last month alone, we’ve launched five new Alexa-enabled devices, introduced Alexa in India, announced integration with BMW, surpassed 25,000 skills, integrated Alexa with Sonos speakers, taught Alexa to distinguish between two voices, and more. Because Alexa’s brain is in the AWS cloud, her new abilities are available to all Echo customers, not just those who buy a new device,” said Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder and CEO. “And it’s working — customers have purchased tens of millions of Alexa-enabled devices, given Echo devices over 100,000 5-star reviews, and active customers are up more than 5x since the same time last year. With thousands of developers and hardware makers building new Alexa skills and devices, the Alexa experience will continue to get even better.”

What is notable here is that while Amazon rarely gives any numbers for its devices segment, CEO Jeff Bezos pointed out that the company has sold “tens of millions” of Alexa-enabled devices, although there is a rather wide range.

Despite the company’s generous spending ways, analysts have said that high margin streams of revenue like those from its advertising, subscription and credit card businesses are expected to continue to grow and help offset higher spending.

Finally, for all the concerns about AMZN’s cash burn, the company reported LTM Free Cash Flow in Q3 of just over $8 billion.

Slightly more concerning, after rebounding in mid/late 2016, AMZN’s operating margin has once again shrunk and is now just 0.8%, the lowest in 3 years.

After a significant rise in the company’s LTM operating margin in the past two years, it appears to have plateaued once again, and is declining on an LTM basis.

Also notable, now that Whole Foods is part of Amazon, the company employed a total of 541,900 (most part-time) workers (a record) as of Sept 30, as global net sales growth rose to 33% in Q3.

Yet despite a few quirks in the quarter, Amazon shareholders are ecstatic, sending AMZN soaring 8% after hours, and approaching its all time highs again, near $1,150 which means Jeff Bezos is once again in the running for world’s second richest man.

This in turn has also pushed the entire nasdaq sharply higher.

via http://ift.tt/2hdJfAK Tyler Durden

House Narrowly Passes Budget, Twitter Bans Ads from Russian Media Outlets, JFK Files to Be Released: P.M. Links

  • TwitterThe House narrowly passed a budget that cuts federal taxes but also scales back state and local income tax deductions, prompting a small group of Republicans in high-tax states to vote against it.
  • Twitter has announced it is banning all ads from Russian-owned news networks RT and Sputnik. Call me dumb, but I don’t think it’s the advertising from news outlets that are obviously and openly connected to Russia that was the problem on social media here. RT responded by claiming Twitter had attempted to sell it election-related ad packages last year.
  • Today the National Archives is releasing a bunch of previously secret files about President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Twitter has already beaten me to jokes about Sen. Ted Cruz’s dad. Also, they might not be released.
  • Former President George H. W. Bush has apologized again for apparently patting or grabbing women’s butts when taking photos with them after a second woman came forth to complain.
  • The Catalonian separatist leader in Spain has put the question of independence before the area’s parliament, which might vote on Friday, even as Spain’s senate votes to use emergency powers to take direct control over the region’s government.
  • A fireworks factory in Indonesia exploded, killing at least 47 people.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to sign up for Reason’s daily updates for more content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2y7L39d
via IFTTT

CVS In Talks To Buy Aetna For Nearly $200 A Share

In a stunning scoop published minutes before the close, WSJ reports CVS Health is in talks to buy Aetna, a defensive acquisition that may help the company fend off Amazon if it moves into the pharmacy space.In a stunning scoop published minutes before the close, WSJ reports CVS Health is in talks to buy Aetna, a defensive acquisition that may help the company fend off Amazon if it moves into the pharmacy space.

Shortly before WSJ published its report, CVS and other pharmacy stocks tumbled to their lows of the day on reports Amazon has been quietly obtaining wholesale pharmacy licenses.  

Earlier this week, Aetna said it would sell its group life and disability business to The Hartford Group for $1.45 billion in cash. Aetna recently moved its headquarters from Hartford, Conn., where the company was founded more than 150 years ago, to New York City.

CNBC reports the offer could be nearly $200 dollars a share, vs. Aetna's market price of $178.60. Aetna has a $60 billion market capitalization. Aetna shares soare 9% on the news, while CVS shares pared their earlier drop, but moved lower again into the close. Managed-care stocks also jumped on the news.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates…

via http://ift.tt/2gGI10n Tyler Durden

‘All Drugged Up And Nowhere To Go’ – S&P Flatlines As Bond Yields, Dollar Surge

Hmmmm…Wall of worry indeed…

 

Chaotic flip-flopping headlines hit Spanish stocks today (and continued after the close)…

 

While Trannies had a big day, S&P and Nasdaq was very quiet…

 

And even as VIX rallied, S&P Futs flatlined…

 

The decoupling continues between The Dow and Dow VIX (and is very clear from the chart, the surge in 2Y yields) which all started when China intervened in its FX market…

 

While the major indices were dead-stick today, there were some significant moves under the hood…

CVS/Walgreens tumbled on AMZN news…

 

Biotechs tumbled on Celgene, then fell further on Trump's opioid speech…

 

FANG Stocks bounced today ahead of tonight's AMZN and GOOGL earnings…(but remain lower on the week)

 

Interestingly, 'High-Tax' Corporations underperformed the broad market despite the adoption of the budget resolution…

 

High yield bond prices leaked back lower to crucial technical support once again…

 

The yield curve flattened very modestly today but banks didn't care…

 

Treasury yields rose once again…

 

Sending 10Y Yields to 7-month highs…

 

Which sent the UST-Bund spread soaring over 200bps (as Draghi extended QE) to six-month highs…

 

The Dollar Index sprinted higher – the biggest day for the dollar in 9 months – to 3 month highs…

 

EUR weakness was the biggest driver of today's push but commodity currency moves (Loonie Central Bank and Aussie CPI) is helping on the week…

 

Dollar strength drove PMs lower but crude jumped on Saudi comments regarding production cuts…

 

Finally, while 10Y Tsy yields are at their 'cheapest' to Bunds in 6 months, Treasury yields are now near their highest relative to equity divi yields in 3 years…

 

 

via http://ift.tt/2iEREkf Tyler Durden