CHRiSTMaS WiTH ED SNoWDeN…

ED SNOWDEN CHRISTMAS ALBUM
.

I’m dreaming of a white noise Christmas
Just like the ones I used to know
Where the tower tops glisten
And spooks can’t listen
To hear crypto-data in the snow

I’m dreaming of a white noise Christmas
With every Christmas card emailed
May your days be merry and bright
And may all
Your Christmases be private

 

PUTIN GREETINGS

 

 

.
FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE

 

 

MERRY CHRISTMAS ED, wherever you are…

From WilliamBanzai7 and the rest of the fringe low brows at Zero Hedge 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/MkCJdccN4Xc/story01.htm williambanzai7

The Complete, Unabridged Confusion Over The Fed’s [December|January|March] Taper

Bloomberg has been kind enough to summarize the epic confusion gripping the sellside on the topic of the Taper, which once again everyone thought would not take place until 2014, and now there is palpable panic may hit as soon as next week. Kudos to the Fed on its “transparent” communication strategy.

Below is Bloomberg’s recap of the main viewpoints on when FOMC will start to Taper, with estimates ranging from FOMC’s Dec. 17-18 meeting in Washington to Jan. or March, based on published research.

Barclays

  • Fed will wait until March to taper

BMO

  • Do not expect “Yuletide Taper”

BNP

  • QE to end by early 2015

BoT-Mitsubishi

  • Fed should take immediate action on QE taper
  • Fed officials dragging feet on QE exit

Capital Economics

  • Jobs data points to tapering this month
  • QE tapering this month “very close call”

Citi

  • Expectations for Fed tapering in Dec. increase in poll
  • Fed to discuss tapering in “concrete” way

 

CRT

  • Fed “apprehensive” about impact of tapering

DB

  • USD to benefit as jobs data seals Dec. taper

GMP

  • Payrolls “not good enough” for Dec. taper

GS

  • Jobs data strong, still expect March taper

HFE

  • Payroll gain points to taper as soon as next month

ING

  • Jobs data suggests tapering is closer

JPMorgan

  • Nov. jobs report “smells a little like tapering”
  • Fed cut to IOER rate would complicate communications

Miller Tabak

  • Drop in jobless rate signals Dec. QE taper

Mizuho

  • Economy not yet ripe for tapering

Morgan Stanley

  • Fed to taper in March, cut UR threshold to 6%

MUFJ

  • Aug.-Nov. labor market data supports Dec. taper

Natixis

  • U.S. economy’s fragility urges Fed caution

Newedge

  • Fed could go beyond tapering next week

Nomura

  • 37% See Fed tapering next week
  • Expect no Dec. tapering

Pimco’s Gross

  • Odds of Fed tapering are 50% in Dec., clear that Fed wants out of QE

Renaissance

  • Fed will wait to taper in 1Q instead of Dec.

Sunrise

  • Taper-tightening link looks stronger on payrolls

TD

  • Fed’s tapering-isn’t-tightening message begins to resonate
  • Odds of Jan. tapering now above 50%

* * *

Good luck.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/YH5VRDzLKyk/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The Complete, Unabridged Confusion Over The Fed's [December|January|March] Taper

Bloomberg has been kind enough to summarize the epic confusion gripping the sellside on the topic of the Taper, which once again everyone thought would not take place until 2014, and now there is palpable panic may hit as soon as next week. Kudos to the Fed on its “transparent” communication strategy.

Below is Bloomberg’s recap of the main viewpoints on when FOMC will start to Taper, with estimates ranging from FOMC’s Dec. 17-18 meeting in Washington to Jan. or March, based on published research.

Barclays

  • Fed will wait until March to taper

BMO

  • Do not expect “Yuletide Taper”

BNP

  • QE to end by early 2015

BoT-Mitsubishi

  • Fed should take immediate action on QE taper
  • Fed officials dragging feet on QE exit

Capital Economics

  • Jobs data points to tapering this month
  • QE tapering this month “very close call”

Citi

  • Expectations for Fed tapering in Dec. increase in poll
  • Fed to discuss tapering in “concrete” way

 

CRT

  • Fed “apprehensive” about impact of tapering

DB

  • USD to benefit as jobs data seals Dec. taper

GMP

  • Payrolls “not good enough” for Dec. taper

GS

  • Jobs data strong, still expect March taper

HFE

  • Payroll gain points to taper as soon as next month

ING

  • Jobs data suggests tapering is closer

JPMorgan

  • Nov. jobs report “smells a little like tapering”
  • Fed cut to IOER rate would complicate communications

Miller Tabak

  • Drop in jobless rate signals Dec. QE taper

Mizuho

  • Economy not yet ripe for tapering

Morgan Stanley

  • Fed to taper in March, cut UR threshold to 6%

MUFJ

  • Aug.-Nov. labor market data supports Dec. taper

Natixis

  • U.S. economy’s fragility urges Fed caution

Newedge

  • Fed could go beyond tapering next week

Nomura

  • 37% See Fed tapering next week
  • Expect no Dec. tapering

Pimco’s Gross

  • Odds of Fed tapering are 50% in Dec., clear that Fed wants out of QE

Renaissance

  • Fed will wait to taper in 1Q instead of Dec.

Sunrise

  • Taper-tightening link looks stronger on payrolls

TD

  • Fed’s tapering-isn’t-tightening message begins to resonate
  • Odds of Jan. tapering now above 50%

* * *

Good luck.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/YH5VRDzLKyk/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Poll: 59% of Americans Want TSA Agents to Carry Guns

A month following the fatal shooting
of a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officer at Los
Angeles International Airport, a majority of Americans, 59 percent,
say that TSA agents in airports should carry guns. Thirty-five
percent of those surveyed believe TSA agents should not be
armed.

Nearly two thirds of both Republicans and Democrats favor arming
TSA agents. Support declines somewhat among non-partisan
independents (51 percent favor) and Republican-leaning independents
(50 percent favor).  While 3 in 10 Democrats and Republicans
oppose the TSA carrying guns, 4 in 10 independents agree. The only
political group in which a majority (56 percent) oppose arming TSA
agents are self-identified libertarians.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted Dec 4-8 2013 interviewed
1011 adults on both mobile (506) and landline (505) phones, with a
margin of error +/- 3.7%. Princeton Survey Research Associates
International executed the nationwide Reason-Rupe survey. Columns
may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results,
detailed tables, and methodology found here. Sign
up for notifications of new releases of the Reason-Rupe
poll here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/12/poll-59-of-americans-want-tsa-agents-t2
via IFTTT

Video: What are You Smoking? Introducing Marijuana Drug Safety Testing

“What are You Smoking? Introducing Marijuana Drug Safety
Testing” is the latest offering from Reason TV. Watch above or
click on the link below for video, full text, supporting links,
downloadable versions, and more Reason TV clips.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/12/video-what-are-you-smoking-introducing-m
via IFTTT

Guest Post: Ukraine’s Two New Energy Deals

Submitted by Scott Belinksi of OilPrice.com,

If one was to believe the picture that most Western media outlets are painting, Ukraine has been lost to Russia. Though the country fought valiantly to sign an Association Agreement with the European Union in Vilnius, Lithuania last month, President Viktor Yanukovych suspended negotiations with the EU at the last possible moment, betraying Ukrainians everywhere. Two recent energy deals that Ukraine has reportedly made, one with Russia and the other with Slovakia, however, show that the reality of the situation is slightly more complex.

Claiming that Yanukovych had always wanted negotiations with the EU to fail would arguably be giving him and his advisors too little credit as political strategists. In terms of public opinion, signing the Association Agreement would have all but secured Yanukovych’s re-election in 2015, whereas his step down from the deal has visibly shaken his legitimacy as President to its core. Rather, too little attention is given to the very real economic pressure Russia has placed on Ukraine and the EU’s reluctance or inability to offset Putin’s ‘trade war’. Furthermore, while Yanukovych did not sign the Association Agreement in Vilnius, he did not commit his country to Putin’s rival ‘Eurasian Union’ either.

Prior to the Vilnius Summit in November, the Ukrainian government found itself between a rock and a hard place. On one hand, Russia was imposing exorbitant gas prices and devastating economic sanctions on Ukraine’s already fragile economy. By October 10th, 2013, trade between the two countries had fallen by 25% and prices for Russian gas, on which Ukraine remains dependent, stood at $420/1000 m3, $50 more than the European average. On the other hand, EU leaders refused to hold tripartite negotiations with Russia and Ukraine, instead using all their leverage to insist that jailed former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, convicted of abuse of office and embezzlement in 2011, be freed.

All of this comes on top of Ukraine’s dire situation. The country faces $10 billion in principal and interest payments next year and has the third-highest default probability in the world. In an address following his decision to suspend negotiations with the EU, Yanukovych stated, "I would have been wrong if I hadn't done everything necessary for people not to lose their jobs, receive salaries, pensions and scholarships.” While many Ukrainians and outside observers may not take the President’s words at face value, it is no lie that, had Ukraine signed the agreement, economic disaster would have been imminent.

Two energy deals

As there was little the EU could/would offer to offset the immediate Russian reprisals on Ukraine’s economy, the government renounced signing the Association Agreement. However, two gas deals currently in the works show that, far from being sucked forever into Russia’s orbit, Ukraine will continue to flirt with both East and West and, most of all, move towards energy independence.

While the exact details of the deal Yanukovych has hammered out with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Sochi last Saturday remain unknown, Edward Lucas, the international editor of The Economist claims that gas prices for Ukraine will be brought down to $200/1000m3 with a $5 billion cherry payment on top. Lucas also claims that Yanukovych has promised that Ukraine will join Russia’s customs union as part of the deal, though this has been virulently denied by the Russian administration. At the same time, payments for Russian gas transferred from Gazprom to Naftogaz between October and December 2013 have been deferred until the Spring of 2014, all of which gives Ukraine some much-needed breathing room.

On the Western front, however, Ukraine agreed on the conditions for a gas deal with Slovakia for importing European Union gas through Slovak pipelines. These new flows, including gas from Poland and Hungary, could exceed 10 billion cubic meters annually, enough to meet Ukraine’s entire import needs. The move, which has long been heralded as a strategy to curb Ukraine’s energy dependence on Russia, comes less than two weeks after negotiations with the EU broke down, questioning the dominant narrative that the Ukrainian government is content to sign itself away to Moscow.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/QZzAkPnxGzw/story01.htm Tyler Durden

30 Year Auction Prices At Highest Yield Since July 2011

The 10 Year may so far be contained below its multi-year high of 3.00% hit in September just before Bernanke’s “no taper” announcement, but the ultra long end, or the 30 Year, keeps dropping. Sure enough, moments ago the latest 30 Year reopening of 29 Year-11 Month CUSIP RD2 priced at a high yield of 3.900%. This may have been half a bp through the 3.905% When Issued, it still was the highest pricing yield on the 30 Year since July 2011, right before the US downgrade and the 20% S&P plunge resulting from the near debt ceiling breach. The Bid To Cover of 2.35 was modestly higher than last month’s 2.16 but had a ways to go to catch up to the TTM average of 2.48. In terms of allotment, Indirects got the bulk of the auction, with 46% or the highest take down since April 2011. Directs were allotted 12.5%, or the lowest since June, which meant Dealers would have to “sell” back to the Fed 41.4% of the auction. So while not as immediately stirring as yesterday’s very weak 10 Year, the sentiment toward the long end continues to deteriorate.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/-F1mIpPNZ1E/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Poll: 60% of Americans Say Government Should Prohibit People from Printing 3D Guns

3D printers can create a
variety of items from plastic, including working guns. However,
the new Reason-Rupe
poll
 finds six in 10 Americans say Americans should not be
allowed to print 3D guns. Thirty percent of Americans believe
people should be allowed to print 3D guns at home.

Majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and independents agree
that printing 3D guns should be prohibited. However, Democrats are
more unified in their opposition with 67 percent who favor
prohibiting 3D printed guns compared to 52 percent of non-partisan
independents and 55 percent of Republicans. Twenty-five percent of
Democrats and a third of non-partisan independents and Republicans
think people should be allowed to print their own functioning 3D
guns.

Even 50 percent of self-described Tea Party supporters think the
government should prohibit people from printing working 3D guns,
while 37 percent say the government should allow this activity. At
the same time, Regular Republicans who don’t identify with the tea
party movement are slightly more likely to favor banning 3D printed
guns 61 percent to 31 percent.

While majorities of all age groups oppose people making their
own 3D guns, young Americans are more likely to think it should be
allowed than older Americans by a margin of 37 percent to 22
percent.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted Dec 4-8 2013 interviewed
1011 adults on both mobile (506) and landline (505) phones, with a
margin of error +/- 3.7%. Princeton Survey Research Associates
International executed the nationwide Reason-Rupe survey. Columns
may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results,
detailed tables, and methodology found here. Sign
up for notifications of new releases of the Reason-Rupe
poll here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/12/poll-60-of-americans-say-government-sho2
via IFTTT

The IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax

shutterstock 110888168 150x150 The IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax

December 12, 2013 
Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

The IMF just dropped another bombshell.

After it recently suggested a “one-off capital levy” – a one-time tax on private wealth as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability across insolvent countries – it has now called for “revenue-maximizing top income tax rates”.

The IMF’s team of monkeys has been working around the clock on this one, figuring that developed nations can increase their overall tax revenue by increasing tax rates.

They’ve singled out the US, suggesting that the US government could maximize its tax revenue by increasing tax brackets to as high as 71%.

Coming from one of the grand wizards of the global financial system, this might be the clearest sign yet that the whole house of cards is dangerously close to being swept away.

Think about it– solvent governments with healthy economies don’t go looking to steal 71% of people’s wealth. They’re raising this point because these governments are desperate. And flat broke.

The ratio of public debt to GDP across advanced economies will reach a historic peak of 110% next year, compared to 75% in 2007.

That’s a staggering increase. Most of the ‘wealithest’ nations in the West now have to borrow money just to pay interest on the money they’ve already borrowed.

This is why we can only expect more financial repression from desperate governments and established institutions.

This means more onerous taxation. More regulation. More controls over credit and capital flows.

And that’s only the financial aspect; the deterioration of our freedom and liberty will continue at an accelerated pace.

Can a person still be considered “free” when 71% of what s/he earns is taken away at the point of a gun by a bankrupt, bullying government? Or are you merely a serf then, existing only to feed the system?

This is why we often stress having a global outlook and considering all options that are on the table.

Because the other side of the coin is that while some countries are tightening the screws and making life more difficult, others are taking a different approach.

Whether out of necessity or because they recognize the trend, many nations around the world are launching new programs to attract international talent and capital.

I’ve mentioned a few of these already– economic citizenship programs in places like Cyprus, Malta, and Antigua (I met a lot of these programs’ principals at a recent global citizenship conference that I spoke at in Miami).

[Note to Premium Members: you’ll receive the details and contact information for the Antigua program today.]

Then there are places like Chile and Colombia which have great programs for entrepreneurs and investors. Other places like Georgia and Panama have opened their doors to nearly all foreigners for residency.

Bottom line– there are options. Some countries are really great places to hold money. Others are great to do business. Others are great places to reside.

The era we’re living in– that of global communications and modern transport– means that you can live in one place, your money can live somewhere else, and you can generate your income in a third location.

Your savings and livelihood need not be enslaved by corrupt politicians bent on stealing your wealth… all to keep their destructive party going just a little bit longer.

The world can truly be your playground. You just need to know the rules of the game.

from SOVErEIGN MAN http://www.sovereignman.com/trends/the-imf-wants-you-to-pay-71-income-tax-13285/
via IFTTT

Poll: Majority of Americans Say the Government Is Burdensome and Impedes Them

The latest
Reason-Rupe poll
 finds that 54 percent of Americans think
government, while necessary for certain functions, is generally
burdensome and impedes them more than helps them. Conversely 41
percent view government as primarily a source of good and helping
people improve their lives.

A majority of Democrats (54 percent) view government as
primarily a source of helping people, while 40 percent generally
view it as an obstacle. In contrast, majorities of Republicans (69
percent) and independents (57 percent) disagree, viewing government
as primarily as burdensome making it more difficult for people to
improve their lives. Twenty-six percent of Republicans and 39
percent of independents view government as primarily helpful.

As education rises, Americans become more optimistic in
government’s ability to help people. For instance a majority (55
percent) of post-graduates agreed the government is a source of
good, compared to 37 percent among those with high school degrees
or less.

Most Caucasians (58 percent) view the government as burdensome
and 37 percent view it as primarily helpful. Latinos and
African-Americans are evenly divided, with slightly more Latinos
viewing government as burdensome (50 percent) than helpful (46
percent).

Although majorities of young Americans agree there is more
government should be doing, 53 percent view government as primarily
burdensome and 43 percent view it as helpful. These numbers are
similar to older Americans who feel government impedes people by a
margin of 55 to 40 percent.

Government employees are also slightly more likely to view
government favorably, with 51 percent who believe government is
primarily helpful. However, 56 percent of private sector employees
say government primarily impedes people from improving their
lives.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted Dec 4-8 2013 interviewed
1011 adults on both mobile (506) and landline (505) phones, with a
margin of error +/- 3.7%. Princeton Survey Research Associates
International executed the nationwide Reason-Rupe survey. Columns
may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results,
detailed tables, and methodology found here. Sign
up for notifications of new releases of the
Reason-Rupe poll here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/12/poll-majority-of-americans-say-the-gove2
via IFTTT