It’s never too late to start

By the summer of 1789, the people of France finally reached their breaking point.

France was the largest, most powerful empire in the world at the time. But their economy had been in ruins for years. Unemployment was high. Inflation had spiraled out of control. And after a very tough winter, many people had starved to death.

Violence, riots, and looting were a common occurrence, and Paris boiled in anger.

On the morning of July 14th, 241 years ago today, a crowd of around 1,000 people formed at the Bastille Saint-Antoine, a French military fortress that was a symbol of royal tyranny.

The crowd was there peacefully, at first. But by the end of the day, the conflict had escalated into a bloody mess… which is why historians usually consider this the start of the French Revolution.

The revolution began as a fight against oppression and a desire for greater liberty and freedom.

But within a few years, France would be plunged in even worse turmoil than before: civil war, hyperinflation, external war with Prussia and Austria, economic decay, and of course, the Reign of Terror.

During this period, 300,000 people were incarcerated, and nearly 30,000 were either publicly executed or died in prison without trial, because the “Committee for Public Safety” deemed them intellectual dissidents.

It literally took decades for France to finally return to ‘normal’.

One of the most interesting eye-witness accounts from the early days of the revolution comes from none other than Thomas Jefferson, who was stationed in Paris at the time as a diplomat.

In a letter to John Jay (another Founding Father), Jefferson provides a first-hand account of the storming of the Bastille… and the subsequent unrest that took over the country:

“[The mob] carried the Governor and Lieutenant governor to the Greve (the place of public execution) cut off their heads, and set them through the city in triumph. . .”

Jefferson could hardly believe what he was seeing: France, the most advanced and civilized country on earth, plunging into chaos.

The circumstances are obviously different today. But there are undoubtedly countless people right now who can hardly believe what they’ve been seeing in the US, and worldwide.

A global pandemic, total economic shutdown, tens of millions of jobs lost, trillions of dollars of debt and money printing, and social unrest, including riots and looting.

And then there’s the angry and growing mob that greets any intellectual dissent with punishment, persecution, and censorship.

People have been fired, forced to denounce family members, beaten, and even threatened with murder, for expressing completely benign perspectives.

Many politicians have already capitulated to the mob. Some have allowed sections of their city to be overrun. And others are actively seizing on the moment to foment a far-reaching Marxist revolution.

In the city of Seattle, a local councilwoman released a video stating her clear objective to overthrow the “racist, sexist, violent, utterly bankrupt system of capitalism. . . and replace it with socialism.”

Let’s be honest… this is worrisome. And it makes a lot of people feel like things are spiraling out of control.

My long-held view that I’ve been writing about for years is that having a Plan B is a way to take back control.

Having a Plan B is a completely rational; it’s like an insurance policy. You hope you’ll never need to use it. But if you ever do, you’ll be really glad that you have one.

A great Plan B has practically zero downside.

There’s no downside in good tax planning that can save you money. There’s no downside in making it more difficult for people to file frivolous lawsuits against you.

And in today’s environment, if you’re concerned about the policy impacts of mob rule, you’ll be better off with a Plan B to physically move yourself, if needed.

Frankly, what we’ve seen in 2020 so far is potentially just a taste of what may be coming.

Just imagine how swiftly and viciously governments could react if there will be COVID-20 or COVID-21.

Just imagine how much rage will explode in the streets depending on who wins the next US Presidential election.

And then there are other risks – like the looming Cold War with China, spiraling deficits, etc. We haven’t even started to see the effects of those.

So, it makes sense to have a second citizenship. Or at least a second residency – somewhere in the world that you can enjoy.

This means you’ll always have another option to live, work, invest, retire… and potentially even pass down those rights to future generations.

A Plan B also takes your finances into consideration.

Will the trillions and trillions of dollars that the Federal Reserve is pumping out cause serious damage to the dollar? Will the world eventually abandon the dollar as a reserve currency?

These are certainly possibilities. That’s why gold and other real assets are also worth considering as part of a Plan B.

Retirement planning is another factor to consider. According to updated projections from the Bipartisan Policy Center, in the Land of the Free, Social Security may be completely out of cash by 2029.

In terms of retirement planning, nine years is right around the corner.

So, taking charge of your retirement with a tax-advantaged retirement structure like a Solo 401(k) or Self-Employed Pension (SEP) IRA makes a lot of sense. These retirement structures allow you to put away a LOT more money for your retirement than traditional plans.

And they also allow you to invest your retirement plan’s funds in a wide variety of assets – private equity, startups, precious metals, real estate, etc.

Having a Plan B is like taking care of your health… it just makes sense. There’s no downside.

And, like taking steps to improve your health, it’s never too late to start.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/2ZrVbFv
via IFTTT

GoFundMe Campaign Raising Money To Buy Goya Products For Food Banks Tops $175,000

GoFundMe Campaign Raising Money To Buy Goya Products For Food Banks Tops $175,000

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 14:20

Authored by Alex Nitzberg via JustTheNews.com,

A GoFundMe campaign soliciting funds to purchase Goya products for food pantries near the nation’s capital has surpassed $175,000 as the Hispanic food company has become a focus of cultural contention.

“Buy GOYA — Support Trump & Feed the Hungry,” the fundraiser headline reads.

“What if we rise up to say no to cancel culture AND feed the hungry at the same time?” a portion of the campaign description declares.

At the time of this writing, the amount raised by the campaign was still climbing.

Calls for a boycott of the company came after Goya CEO Bob Unanue, whose grandfather founded the company in 1936, made positive comments about President Trump at a Thursday White House event related to a Hispanic Prosperity Initiative.

“We’re all truly blessed at the same time to have a leader like President Trump who is a builder,” Unanue declared during the event.

 “And that’s what my grandfather did, he came to this country to build, to grow, to prosper. And so we have an incredible builder, and we pray, we pray for our leadership, our president, and we pray for our country that we will continue to prosper and to grow.”

Former Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro, who previously served as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the Obama administration, on Thursday urged Americans to “think twice” prior to purchasing Goya’s goods. 

Progressive icon Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, also expressed her displeasure on Thursday: “Oh look, it’s the sound of me Googling ‘how to make your own Adobo,'” she tweeted

Unanue during a Friday interview with “Fox and Friends” defended his decisions and noted that he had previously engaged with former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama. When asked about the boycott targeting Goya, Unanue remarked that “it’s suppression of speech.” 

Republicans including Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and President Trump came out in support of the food company.

Casey Harper, the 27-year-old Virginian who launched the fundraising campaign, spoke to Fox Business:

 “People are seeing in the news a double standard for one political view,” Harper said.

“Americans are fundamentally generous people. … I’m not surprised we have raised so much because people are tired of having to walk on eggshells in political discourse.” 

“In a time where speaking your mind can cost you your job, or get you facing legal action because the corporate elite fear the mob just as much as anyone, the most important issue is to speak boldly at the risk of your own well-being,” he said, according to the news outlet. “If enough people do that, lovers of free speech and limited government will win.”

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/30cb4PE Tyler Durden

NYC Recovery Stalling As Consumer Activity Levels Underwhelm

NYC Recovery Stalling As Consumer Activity Levels Underwhelm

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 14:05

The US economy has stalled, virus cases are surging, a fiscal cliff looms, and the consumer remains severely damaged – all suggesting the shape of the recovery is anything but a “V.” 

Citing real-time data from several technology firms, Bloomberg piecemeals a report that shows the largest metropolitan economy in the US, in terms of GDP, that is New York City, has had a muted recovery.  

Real-time data from Moovit App Global Ltd. shows residents of the Big Apple rode fewer buses, bicycles, and trains this week, with public transportation demand at 55% below pre-COVID-19 levels, and worse than last week (53%) as people stay home thanks to rising virus cases. 

When it comes to restaurant data via OpenTable Inc., the numbers are stunning, seated diners in New York City are still 94% lower than a year ago. The revival of the restaurant industry was put on hold last week when city officials delayed the return of indoor dining due to surging virus cases.

When it comes to congestion, the TomTom Traffic Index shows city streets at peak traffic on Wednesday afternoon were at 37% at 5 pm from 32% a week earlier. Last year’s level was 72%.

Apple mobility trends show driving has recovered to baseline – though walking and transit remain well under averages. 

For more color on the muted recovery in New York City – here’s a live shot (July 9, 11:21 ET) of Times Square and Broadway. It’s like a ghost town: 

Times Square 

Broadway 

So about that V-shaped recovery? 

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3gWgoNU Tyler Durden

‘COVID Secured’: Over 15% Of Tesla Employees Affected After Musk’s Early Reopening

‘COVID Secured’: Over 15% Of Tesla Employees Affected After Musk’s Early Reopening

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 13:55

Over 130 Tesla employees have tested positive to COVID-19 out of a total of 1,550 “affected” workers, according to an internal leak obtained by electrek, which notes that “affected” appears to refer to employees who had confirmed exposure to the virus.

Tesla has around 10,000 employees at its Fremont, California factory, where most of the infections and exposures have occurred.

This news comes weeks after CEO Elon Musk threw a fit several weeks ago about not being able to reopen the company’s Fremont factory. He even went so far as to threaten to move the company out of California. 

What’s more, “Based on Tesla’s own data, the majority of employees tracked for exposure have been not been tested, or it is unknown whether they have been tested,” according to the report.

Tesla’s own internal data also confirmed that the amount of “exposure” that employees at Fremont have had has spiked over the last 14 days.

The company is reportedly telling workers that have been affected:

  • Since this is precautionary only, if you test negative, you can return to work 24 hours after being fever free (without the use of fever-reducing medication) and improved symptoms (if symptoms develop).
  • If you test positive, you will need to stay home for 10 days after the test date and at least three days after you have recovered. Recovery means that your fever is gone for 72 hours without the use of fever-reducing medications and your respiratory symptoms have improved. A doctor’s note is required to say you are fit to return to work.

electrek also says that sources told it that Tesla had “some outbreaks” within “a few teams” at Fremont. 

Recall, just weeks ago we noted that Tesla’s head of safety was claiming that Covid-19 transmission wasn’t taking place inside of the Fremont factory and claimed that Tesla has “had zero COVID-19 workplace transmissions,” since restarting operations at Fremont in May. In other words, Tesla was blaming the transmission on what employees are doing outside of the workplace.

As we said then: it’s a bold claim to make without having the science to back up how one arrives at the conclusion of where and when virus transmissions take place. After all, you can’t see, feel or touch the virus. So, how can Tesla be so certain?

At the time, employees told CNBC that it was “impossible” to do their work building cars while complying with safety rules that have been put into place by Alameda County. 

Specifically, these employees said, they cannot wear a face covering during their entire shift, thoroughly clean shared tools and equipment between shifts, and keep social distance between coworkers during work, or even during breaks.

Days before that bold claim, we wrote about how four Tesla workers had tested positive for the coronavirus. This news came after we noted that two workers had tested positive for the virus just days after Elon Musk went to war with Alameda County and Governor Newsom for the right to re-open his Fremont factory. 

It appears that the early June statement about no transmission at Fremont may have been more than just a good spin on events that took place – but rather spin for the forthcoming information about increased cases at Tesla that we are now learning about.

As electrek notes:

Now, two months later, the US is still seeing record levels of new COVID-19 cases, and Tesla is also experiencing an increasing number of cases in its workforce. Tesla’s workforce is largely in California, which has been particularly hard hit in recent weeks.

Famously, Elon Musk commented back in March on his Twitter thatBased on current trends, probably close to zero new cases in US too by end of April”.

Even with the company’s sycophants, Elon’s behavior isn’t flying. electrek editor Fred Lambert concluded by stating:

While Tesla seems to be pushing common-sense measures to prevent the spread, they also seem to be willing to overlook things if it means that they can keep production going and ramp it up.

I think it starts at the top, and with Elon’s comments often dismissing the seriousness of the pandemic, I can see how this can trickle down in the organization.

Elon should publicly correct the course here, admit that some of the comments he made regarding the pandemic were wrong, and that he and Tesla are taking the situation extremely seriously.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2C1aV9W Tyler Durden

WHO Will Not Investigate Wuhan Lab Where Coronavirus Was Kept

WHO Will Not Investigate Wuhan Lab Where Coronavirus Was Kept

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 13:50

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

The World Health Organisation announced Monday that it will not be visiting the Wuhan Institute of Virology during its investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, despite the fact that the lab held samples of coronavirus that were almost exactly the same as that which caused a global pandemic.

The WHO stated that its mission will only seek to “advance the understanding of animal hosts for Covid-19 and ascertain how the disease jumped between animals and humans”.

As The Independent notes, the announcement suggests that the theory of the virus being modified or leaking from the lab in Wuhan has already been completely discounted by the WHO.

In addition, the body has refused to provide any details of the locations it will be visiting during its investigation in China.

As The Independent report notes, “It had previously emerged the lab had held a coronavirus sample that was 96.2 per cent the same as Covid-19 for almost a decade. This prompted speculation about the origin of the virus…”

Several prominent researchers and scientists have also noted that the lab must be investigated given this fact.

It also previously emerged that the Wuhan Institute of Virology took a shipment of some of the world’s deadliest pathogens just weeks before the outbreak of the coronavirus. It is also known that the lab was tampering with natural pathogens and mutating them to become more infectious.

Intelligence figures across the globe have also called for the Wuhan lab to be investigated.

The latest development comes amid reports that Chinese virologists have fled Hong Kong and effectively defected to the West with evidence against the Chinese Communist Party concerning its role in the COVID-19 pandemic.

The WHO previously complained that it had ‘not been invited’ by China to investigate the outbreak, and has continually been criticised for propping up Communist Party talking points.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Ca3Jbq Tyler Durden

Bari Weiss Quits New York Times, Excoriates Paper As ‘Performance Space’ For Woke Olympics

Bari Weiss Quits New York Times, Excoriates Paper As ‘Performance Space’ For Woke Olympics

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 13:30

The internal schism at the New York Times has claimed yet another staffer, as opinion editor Bari Weiss has left the paper and penned a scorching resignation letter denouncing the Times as nothing more than an echo chamber for ‘woke’ activists masquerading as journalists who believe dissent has no place on the platform.

But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else. –Bari Weiss

As a refresher, the Times newsroom erupted in chaos following the decision to publish an Op-Ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK), in which he suggested that the Trump administration should deploy the military to quell violent race-riots gripping the country following the death of a black suspect while in custody of Minneapolis police.

An internal schism formed within the Times, with younger ‘woke’ staffers insisting that such ‘wrongthink’ has no place on the platform, while others defended the decision to publish Cotton’s divergent opinion.

In the end, the woke mob won; the Times added an editor’s note conveying regret for publishing it – which was accompanied by the resignation of editorial page editor James Bennett (who Weiss writes ‘led the effort’ to reform the paper after the 2016 election).

Which brings us back to Bari Weiss, who came under intense fire by her NYT colleagues after she laid out what was going on in the newsroom in a Twitter thread, which ultimately defended the decision to publish Cotton’s op-ed.

In her Tuesday resignation letter, Weiss excoriated the Times.

My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m “writing about the Jews again.” Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a truly “inclusive” one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are.” -Bari Weiss

Weiss described the Times as a hostile work environment, and slammed the paper for allowing “this kind of behavior to go on inside your company in full view of the paper’s entire staff and the public.”

“Showing up for work as a centrist at an American newspaper should not require bravery,” Weiss writes, adding “But the truth is that intellectual curiosity—let alone risk-taking—is now a liability at The Times.

“Why edit something challenging to our readers, or write something bold only to go through the numbing process of making it ideologically kosher, when we can assure ourselves of job security (and clicks) by publishing our 4000th op-ed arguing that Donald Trump is a unique danger to the country and the world? And so self-censorship has become the norm.

What rules that remain at The Times are applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized. Everyone else lives in fear of the digital thunderdome. Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets.”

Published in its entirety below:

* * *

Dear A.G.,

It is with sadness that I write to tell you that I am resigning from The New York Times. 

I joined the paper with gratitude and optimism three years ago. I was hired with the goal of bringing in voices that would not otherwise appear in your pages: first-time writers, centrists, conservatives and others who would not naturally think of The Times as their home. The reason for this effort was clear: The paper’s failure to anticipate the outcome of the 2016 election meant that it didn’t have a firm grasp of the country it covers. Dean Baquet and others have admitted as much on various occasions. The priority in Opinion was to help redress that critical shortcoming.

I was honored to be part of that effort, led by James Bennet. I am proud of my work as a writer and as an editor. Among those I helped bring to our pages: the Venezuelan dissident Wuilly Arteaga; the Iranian chess champion Dorsa Derakhshani; and the Hong Kong Christian democrat Derek Lam. Also: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Masih Alinejad, Zaina Arafat, Elna Baker, Rachael Denhollander, Matti Friedman, Nick Gillespie, Heather Heying, Randall Kennedy, Julius Krein, Monica Lewinsky, Glenn Loury, Jesse Singal, Ali Soufan, Chloe Valdary, Thomas Chatterton Williams, Wesley Yang, and many others.

But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have become those of the paper, the paper itself has increasingly become a kind of performance space. Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the world and then draw their own conclusions. I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.

My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m “writing about the Jews again.” Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a truly “inclusive” one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are.

There are terms for all of this: unlawful discrimination, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge. I’m no legal expert. But I know that this is wrong. 

I do not understand how you have allowed this kind of behavior to go on inside your company in full view of the paper’s entire staff and the public. And I certainly can’t square how you and other Times leaders have stood by while simultaneously praising me in private for my courage. Showing up for work as a centrist at an American newspaper should not require bravery.

Part of me wishes I could say that my experience was unique. But the truth is that intellectual curiosity—let alone risk-taking—is now a liability at The Times. Why edit something challenging to our readers, or write something bold only to go through the numbing process of making it ideologically kosher, when we can assure ourselves of job security (and clicks) by publishing our 4000th op-ed arguing that Donald Trump is a unique danger to the country and the world? And so self-censorship has become the norm.

What rules that remain at The Times are applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized. Everyone else lives in fear of the digital thunderdome. Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets. 

Op-eds that would have easily been published just two years ago would now get an editor or a writer in serious trouble, if not fired. If a piece is perceived as likely to inspire backlash internally or on social media, the editor or writer avoids pitching it. If she feels strongly enough to suggest it, she is quickly steered to safer ground. And if, every now and then, she succeeds in getting a piece published that does not explicitly promote progressive causes, it happens only after every line is carefully massaged, negotiated and caveated.

It took the paper two days and two jobs to say that the Tom Cotton op-ed “fell short of our standards.” We attached an editor’s note on a travel story about Jaffa shortly after it was published because it “failed to touch on important aspects of Jaffa’s makeup and its history.” But there is still none appended to Cheryl Strayed’s fawning interview with the writer Alice Walker, a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard Illuminati. 

The paper of record is, more and more, the record of those living in a distant galaxy, one whose concerns are profoundly removed from the lives of most people. This is a galaxy in which, to choose just a few recent examples, the Soviet space program is lauded for its “diversity”; the doxxing of teenagers in the name of justice is condoned; and the worst caste systems in human history includes the United States alongside Nazi Germany.

Even now, I am confident that most people at The Times do not hold these views. Yet they are cowed by those who do. Why? Perhaps because they believe the ultimate goal is righteous. Perhaps because they believe that they will be granted protection if they nod along as the coin of our realm—language—is degraded in service to an ever-shifting laundry list of right causes. Perhaps because there are millions of unemployed people in this country and they feel lucky to have a job in a contracting industry. 

Or perhaps it is because they know that, nowadays, standing up for principle at the paper does not win plaudits. It puts a target on your back. Too wise to post on Slack, they write to me privately about the “new McCarthyism” that has taken root at the paper of record.

All this bodes ill, especially for independent-minded young writers and editors paying close attention to what they’ll have to do to advance in their careers. Rule One: Speak your mind at your own peril. Rule Two: Never risk commissioning a story that goes against the narrative. Rule Three: Never believe an editor or publisher who urges you to go against the grain. Eventually, the publisher will cave to the mob, the editor will get fired or reassigned, and you’ll be hung out to dry.

For these young writers and editors, there is one consolation. As places like The Times and other once-great journalistic institutions betray their standards and lose sight of their principles, Americans still hunger for news that is accurate, opinions that are vital, and debate that is sincere. I hear from these people every day. “An independent press is not a liberal ideal or a progressive ideal or a democratic ideal. It’s an American ideal,” you said a few years ago. I couldn’t agree more. America is a great country that deserves a great newspaper. 

None of this means that some of the most talented journalists in the world don’t still labor for this newspaper. They do, which is what makes the illiberal environment especially heartbreaking. I will be, as ever, a dedicated reader of their work. But I can no longer do the work that you brought me here to do—the work that Adolph Ochs described in that famous 1896 statement: “to make of the columns of The New York Times a forum for the consideration of all questions of public importance, and to that end to invite intelligent discussion from all shades of opinion.”

Ochs’s idea is one of the best I’ve encountered. And I’ve always comforted myself with the notion that the best ideas win out. But ideas cannot win on their own. They need a voice. They need a hearing. Above all, they must be backed by people willing to live by them. 

Sincerely,

 

Bari

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2CdI9mr Tyler Durden

A Surge In Small Business Bankruptcies Is Underway

A Surge In Small Business Bankruptcies Is Underway

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 13:15

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk,

The new rules make it easier for small businesses to file for chapter 11. And they are.

Small Businesses Walking Away

In 2008, homeowners walked away from mortgages. 

Thanks to the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), in effect as of February 19, 2020, small businesses have an easier shot at doing the same.

For example, the Twisted Root Burger grew quickly, but co-founder now says ‘I’m gonna walk away’ from some locations.

Twisted Root Burger was a Texas success story, expanding from one casual restaurant in 2006 to 24 sites including restaurants, bars, a brewery and a theater. Now, the company is moving fast in another direction—into bankruptcy.

“I’m not gonna open that restaurant at half the revenue,” said co-founder Jason Boso. “I’m gonna walk away from those restaurants. I’m not gonna set myself up for failure.”

More than 500 companies filed for bankruptcy under the small-business bankruptcy rules since February, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute. June was the top month for filings with 131 cases; many were filed in states hit hard by the pandemic like Florida, Texas, California, New York and Illinois.

“It was somewhat prescient,” said Ryan Wagner, a restructuring and bankruptcy attorney with international law firm Greenberg Traurig LLP. “It was passed without the foresight of the pandemic.” The law is the most significant change to the bankruptcy code since 2005.

SBRA Highlights

  • Applies to businesses with $2.7 million in liabilities, raised to $7.5 million under coronavirus stimulus

  • Owners continue operating their business while in court

  • Owners can retain equity after exiting bankruptcy

  • Owners can modify residential mortgages if home was collateral for a business loan

  • Faster turnaround to save time and minimize legal fees

  • Owners generally have three to five years to repay creditors

  • Creditors can be paid based on a business’s projected income

Walking away gets a new lease on life, this time for small businesses.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3j1San8 Tyler Durden

Google Plans New Food Delivery Service: Economic Times

Google Plans New Food Delivery Service: Economic Times

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 13:02

The Economic Times, India’s largest English-language newspaper, has just reported a surprising scoop: That Google-parent Alphabet Inc. is planning to enter the food delivery business, a long-anticipated move that has rivals like Uber and Grubhub very nervous.

Reports first surfaced via a video report published on one of the ET’s twitter feeds.

The plan will include a virtual platform allowing users to place orders via their google accounts, though deliveries will be coordinated by the restaurants.

In India, Google will partner with Dunzo, an Indian startup in which Google has invested.

The news didn’t have much of an impact on Alphabet shares, but Uber shares have tumbled. The company just announced plans to buy Postmates as it focuses on growing its ‘Uber Eats’ business.

 

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2AWUzOQ Tyler Durden

Massive Pipeline Fire In Egypt Burns Highway Of Vehicles 

Massive Pipeline Fire In Egypt Burns Highway Of Vehicles 

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 12:54

Reuters is reporting a massive fire has erupted on Egypt’s Shuqair-Mostorod crude pipeline along the Cario-Ismalia Desert Road. 

Here’s what we know so far: 

  • 14-Jul-2020 12:37:34 PM – FIRE BREAKS OUT IN EGYPT’S SHUQAIR-MOSTOROD CRUDE PIPELINE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE CAIRO-ISMAILIA DESERT ROAD – STATEMENT 14-Jul-2020
  • FIRE IN EGYPT’S SHUQAIR-MOSTOROD CRUDE PIPELINE IS BROUGHT UNDER CONTROL, IT WAS CAUSED BY A BROKEN PIPELINE – MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM STATEMENT

Alleged video of the fire has surfaced on Twitter:

“About an hour before the fire, photos and calls were sent for the explosion of the oil pipeline next to the Peugeot agency, next to the 10th position. Unfortunately, no one moved and the disaster occurred,” one Twitter user said

Firefighters on scene.

Shorouk News said, “the first pictures of a huge fire in the parking area of peace near the Cairo-Ismailia Desert Road.”

At the moment, there are no official reports on causalities. 

Video of crude gushing from a busted pipeline has surfaced on Twitter. The cause of the damaged pipeline has yet to be determined. 

pic.twitter.com/smLzsoUlAb #مصر_الإسماعيلية

*Story is developing…  

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/38XpgAg Tyler Durden

Florida Labs Acknowledge “Major Errors” After Reporting Positivity Rates Of 100%

Florida Labs Acknowledge “Major Errors” After Reporting Positivity Rates Of 100%

Tyler Durden

Tue, 07/14/2020 – 12:45

Florida health officials left COVID-19 trackers slackjawed on Sunday when it reported more than 15k new infections in just 24 hours on Sunday (the data were gleaned from the prior day). But as hospitalizations surge, questions have grown about whether the state is still trying to ‘juke’ its data, something that a now infamous whistleblower alleged before she was fired (she has since started her own COVID-19 data portal relying on public info).

Journalists scouring the reams of daily data for discrepancies have apparently happened upon bombshell they had been hoping for: Orlando Health has just confirmed that some of the data it shared over the weekend were wrong, after journalists reported more than 50 labs showing 100% positivity rate, or roughly around there. One local Fox affiliate looked into the numbers and contacted a few of the labs to confirm that their internal data matched the public data released by the state.

As it turned out, some of these discrepancies were pretty extreme: Orlando Health, one of the organizations contacted by Fox, confirmed that it’s positivity rate was actually 9.8%, not the 98% that had been reported to the state.

Coronavirus Cases Up The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate. However, when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital, they confirmed errors in the report. Orlando Health’s positivity rate is only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as in the report.

The Orlando VA confirmed a similar discrepancy.

The report also showed that the Orlando Veteran’s Medical Center had a positivity rate of 76%. A spokesperson for the VA told FOX 35 News on Tuesday that this does not reflect their numbers and that the positivity rate for the center is actually 6 percent.

FOX 35 is still waiting to hear back from the Florida Department of Health about an explanation for these errors. Readers can maybe find some comfort in the fact that these errors likely exaggerated the statewide positivity rate, but still: With the state’s handling of the response coming under such intense scrutiny – and with Gov DeSantis admitting that reopening bars so quickly was a mistake – sees errors point to a culture of carelessness that Floridians might find extremely discouraging, especially now that their state is home to the new national epicenter (Miami).

Watch the clip below for more from FOX 35.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2DzgRHk Tyler Durden