FOMC Minutes Show “Patient” Majority Expect Rates On Hold, Concern Over Flat Yield Curve

Since the uber-dovish flip-flop of The Fed on March 20th, the long-end of the US Treasury curve has outperformed all other asset classes…

The dollar and gold are also higher along with The Dow as we note that the yield curve flattened dramatically before rebounding back to almost unchanged…

And mirroring the yield curve, the market’s expectations for Fed rate-changes in 2019 plunged (dovishly right after the March FOMC) only to rebound hawkishly in recent weeks…

Recall the FOMC held rates steady, forecast no additional hikes this year and announced plans to end balance sheet shrinkage in September, and as Bloomberg reports, that led markets to price in interest rate cuts by next January.  The minutes could push back against those expectations for actual cuts as the committee lays out conditions needed for a cut — or a hike.

Bloomberg Chief U.S. Economist Carl Riccadonna warned that “an important focal point of the minutes will be to determine the extent to which Fed officials expect the sources of recent economic weakness to be transitory. This, in turn, will signal how they might respond to signs of firming hiring, consumption and output ahead of the Fed’s next rate decision on May 1.”

All eyes will be on any signal of rate-change direction (after Powell said in the last press conference, he didn’t know whether the central bank’s next move would be to raise or lower its short-term benchmark rate), as well as what to expect when the balance sheet run-off ends.

The Minutes highlighted a sheepishly dovish FOMC…

  • *FED MAJORITY SAW RISKS WARRANTING RATES ON HOLD THROUGH 2019

  • *SOME FED OFFICIALS SAW FURTHER MODEST INCREASE LATER THIS YEAR

  • *FED OFFICIALS SAW `SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTIES’ AROUND OUTLOOK

  • *SEVERAL FED OFFICIALS CONCERNED YIELD CURVE WAS QUITE FLAT

  • *SEVERAL FED OFFICIALS POINTED TO INCREASED DEBT, LEVERAGE

Key highlights include:

On the outlook:

“With regard to the outlook for monetary policy beyond this meeting, a majority of participants expected that the evolution of the economic outlook and risks to the outlook would likely warrant leaving the target range unchanged for the remainder of the year.”

On the direction of rates rate:

“Several participants noted that their views of the appropriate target range for the federal funds rate could shift in either direction based on incoming data and other developments.”

“Some participants indicated that if the economy evolved as they currently expected, with economic growth above its longer-run trend rate, they would likely judge it appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate modestly later this year”

On the yield curve:

“Several participants expressed concern that the yield curve for Treasury securities was now quite flat and noted that historical evidence suggested that an inverted yield curve could portend economic weakness;”

On what “patient” means:

“Several participants observed that the characterization of the Committee’s approach to monetary policy as ‘patient’ would need to be reviewed regularly as the economic outlook and uncertainties surrounding the outlook evolve.”
“A couple of participants noted that the ‘patient’ characterization should not be seen as limiting the Committee’s options for making policy adjustments when they are deemed appropriate.”

On the lack of inflation:

“Participants also discussed alternative interpretations of subdued inflation pressures in current economic circumstances and the associated policy implications.”

On the risks to the US economy:

“Participants commented on a number of risks associated with their outlook for economic activity.”

On the risks to the international economy:

“A few participants noted that there remained a high level of uncertainty associated with international developments, including ongoing trade talks and Brexit deliberations, although a couple of participants remarked that the risks of adverse outcomes were somewhat lower than in anuary.”

On implementing a Reverse Repo Ceiling facility

“Some participants suggested that, at future meetings, the Committee should discuss the potential benefits and costs of tools that might reduce reserve demand or support interest rate control.”

On the fact that the Fed’s forecasts have become a joke:

“The Chair noted that he had asked the subcommittee on communications to consider ways to improve the information contained in the SEP and to improve communications regarding the role of the federal funds rate projections in the SEP as part of the policy process.”

*  *  *

Finally, on the bright side, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said he was right to recommend Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chairman despite President Donald Trump’s frequent criticism of the central bank leader.

“I don’t feel like I picked the wrong person,” Mnuchin said Wednesday in an interview on CNBC.

“But I respect the president’s views and his views of the economy, where he’s had tremendous insight.”

*  *  *

Full Minutes below:

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2I9iQDr Tyler Durden

“Spying Did Occur”: Barr Vows To Investigate FBI, DOJ Conduct During 2016 Election

Attorney General William Barr admitted on Wednesday that the Obama administration ‘spied’ on President Trump, and has vowed to get to the bottom of it. 

“I think spying did occur,” said Barr during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing – expanding on comments made the day before. “But the question is whether it was adequately predicated and I’m not suggesting it wasn’t adequately predicated, but I need to explore that.

“I am going to be reviewing both the genesis and the conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016,” Barr told lawmakers, according to The Hill. “A lot of this has already been investigated and a substantial portion that’s being investigated is being investigated by the inspector general of the department.” 

Barr later clarified his earlier comment, saying that he was concerned “improper surveillance” may have occurred during the 2016 election, and he will be “looking into it.” 

“I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred. I’m saying that I am concerned about it and looking into it. That’s all,” Barr clarified. 

Barr downplayed recent reports that he had formed a team to investigate the FBI’s actions in the original Russia counterintelligence probe, but said he had in mind bringing “some colleagues” together to review information turned up by the inspector general investigation, as well as Republican-led congressional probes to determine whether there is a need for further investigation at the Justice Department.

Barr said he is particularly concerned about why the Trump campaign was not notified about the FBI’s counterintelligence probe. –The Hill

“That is one of the questions I have, that I feel normally the campaign would have been advised of this,” Barr said to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). “I just want to satisfy myself that there was no abuse of law enforcement or intelligence powers.”

Barr pointed out that two former US attorneys linked to the Trump campaign – Chris Christie and Rudy Giuliani – weren’t notified of any investigation. 

“I just want to satisfy myself that there was no abuse of law enforcement or intelligence powers,” Barr told Graham – though he insisted he was not “launching [an] investigation into the FBI.”

“To the extent there are any issues of the FBI, I do not view it as a problem that is endemic to the FBI,” said Barr – adding that there were likely “failures” by the bureau’s top brass. 

“If it becomes necessary to look over some former officials’ activities, I expect I’ll be able to heavily rely on Chris,” said Barr – referring to FBI Director Christopher Wray. “I believe I have an obligation to make sure government power is not abused.” 

In separate congressional hearings both Tuesday and Wednesday, Barr faced multiple questions about his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report on his investigation into Russia’s 2016 election meddling. He hopes to release a redacted version of the report within a week.

Barr told Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) that he isn’t aware of “specific evidence” that actions taken during the original FBI probe into Russian interference or Mueller’s probe were improper.

But he reiterated that he wants to review the intelligence community’s actions in the original counterintelligence probe.

“I have no specific evidence that I have now,” Barr said. “I have questions about it.”

“I have concerns about various aspects of it,” he added. –The Hill

***

As we noted on Tuesday, Barr’s team may want to investigate exactly how information flowed from a self-professed member of the Clinton Foundation – Joseph Mifsud – to Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos in March of 2016, who learned during the encounter that Russia had “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. 

Papadopoulos would later tell Australian diplomat Alexander Downer about the so-called Clinton dirt, which resulted in the launch of “operation crossfire hurricane,” the code name for the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign. 

In September 2016, the FBI would send spy Stefan Halper to further probe Papadopoulos on the Clinton email allegation, and – according to an interview with pundit Dan Bongino, Papadopoulos says Halper angrily accused him of working with Russia before storming out of a meeting. 

Of note, Halper was hired by the Defense Department’s Office of Net Assessment for $244,960.00 on September 15, 2015. Overall, the Obama DoD paid Halper more than $1 millionstarting in 2012. 

A massive thread on the entire ‘setup’ can be seen here.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2Iv6DbH Tyler Durden

104: Taking matters into your own hands

Last week in its annual report, the US government reported that Social Security’s long-term, unfunded liability now exceeds $50 TRILLION.

Moreover, they state that the Social Security and Medicare trust funds will run out of money in 2034.

This is the government’s own calculation.

Bottom line: The younger you are, the less you should count on Social Security in your retirement plans. You must take matters into your own hands and save independently for retirement.

But that’s easier said than done, right? The traditional concept of ‘saving for retirement’ is to set aside some money from your monthly paycheck, and put it in something like an IRA.

That works fine for some people. But what if you simply don’t have any more money from your paycheck to save?

Or what if you’ve already hit the maximum amount you’re allowed to contribute to a conventional IRA?

Fortunately, there are great solutions. We’ve written about SEP IRAs in the past. But there’s another structure I’d like to discuss called a Solo 401(k).

A Solo 401(k) is an incredibly flexible, robust retirement structure that allows you to set aside potentially tens of thousands of dollars of income from a ‘side-business’ each year.

This could be just about anything– selling products on Amazon, generating advertising revenue from YouTube videos, Airbnb rentals, freelance consulting, anything.

And almost anyone can do this. You could literally be a 15 year old teenager walking dogs on the weekends for extra cash, and stash that money into a Solo 401(k).

If you’re currently an employee at a US-based company, you might already have a regular 401(k); it allows you to make pre-tax contributions to your retirement, and sometimes the employer even matches what you put in.

The plan probably doesn’t offer much leeway in terms of where you can invest that money, though. At best, they probably give you a list of mutual funds from which to choose.

But a Solo 401(k) – a.k.a. an Individual 401(k), Self-Directed 401(k) or Self-Employed 401(k) – lets you control where your funds are invested.

And unlike a conventional IRA – another common retirement structure – it lets you contribute MUCH more money to your retirement before it’s taxed.

It just has to be done with income from self-employment, or from a side job.

With all of the money-making options available today, it’s not difficult to stash a lot more money into a tax-advantaged retirement account.

There are lots of details to consider when opening a Solo(k), but here’s the general idea:

First, since we’re talking about self-employment income, you have to think of yourself as both an employer and an employee.

As an employee of your own business, you can make a total of $19,000 in retirement contributions this year if you have a 401(k), plus another $6,000 on top of that if you’re over the age of 50.

But you can contribute even more than that since you’re also the employer in your business.

For this tax year, the maximum total contribution to a 401(k) between an employer and employee is $56,000 (for those under the age of 50) and $62,000 (for those 50 and over)… so that’s potentially tens of thousands of dollars in extra contributions you can make.

More importantly, these contributions can be deducted from your taxes.

So when the Bolsheviks come to power and ratchet up tax rates to 70%, you’ll be able to take a LOT of money off the table to set aside for your retirement that they can’t touch.

Plus, Solo 401(k)’s are incredibly flexible. You can invest in so many different things, ranging from real estate (including property overseas), cryptocurrency, private businesses and venture-backed startups, etc.

Solo 401(k)’s have an interest feature as well– you are actually able to BORROW money from your own retirement plan.

The IRS allows you to borrow up to 50% of your Solo(k)’s value up to a maximum of $50,000, for up to five years, and subject to certain rules.

You might not ever need it, but it’s nice to know that you have a source of emergency funds if necessary.

And this is something unique to 401(k)’s. You can’t do this with an IRA.

Naturally all of these benefits are predicated on you having some sort of side business– whether you’re driving for Uber, freelancing on Fiver, or selling lemonade on the street corner.

But the ability to channel the vast majority of that business income into a structure that (a) keeps it away from the government, and (b) secures your future retirement, is a smart thing to do.

And that’s what today’s podcast is about: all the great things you can do with a solo 401(k), and why you definitely might want to consider establishing one– even if you already have another retirement plan.

You can listen to the podcast here.

Source

from Sovereign Man http://bit.ly/2Z2OtDH
via IFTTT

Baltimore City Council Demands Mayor To Resign After $500k Book Fraud    

The 14 members of the Baltimore City Council requested Monday for Mayor Catherine E. Pugh’s resignation over her ongoing children’s book scandal, The Washington Post reports.

In a two-sentence letter, the council said the “entire membership of the Baltimore City Council believes that it is not in the best interest of the City of Baltimore for you to continue to serve as Mayor. We urge you to tender your resignation, effective immediately.”

Pugh, who recently took an indefinite leave of absence for ‘medical issues,’ has been “recovering from pneumonia and regaining her health,” said a statement issued by her office.  “She fully intends to resume the duties of her office and continuing her work on behalf of the people and the City of Baltimore.”

City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young is assisting as acting mayor, said the Post.

Pugh has been heavily criticized after the Baltimore Sun reported that she reportedly received $500,000 from the University of Maryland Medical System for her self-authored “Healthy Holly” book series.

The university system paid Pugh for 100,000 copies of the book while she was on the board. The book teaches children how to live healthily; however, some 50,000 copies remain unaccounted for (as per the Baltimore Sun, the copies may have never been printed).

The Sun’s report also said at the time Pugh received $100,000 tranche for her books, a company in the city called Kaiser Permanent received a $48 million contract. Coincidence?

Pugh issued an apology in March for her book ventures.

“I sincerely want to say that I apologize that I have done something to upset the people of Baltimore,” she said on March 28. “I never intended to do anything that could not stand up to scrutiny.”

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan called for an immediate investigation into the possible fraud. He asked state prosecutor and Comptroller Peter Franchot to examine the case.

The Baltimore City House delegation said that it was “not in the best interests of Baltimore” for the mayor to stay in office.

“The position of mayor is not a revolving door,” Del. Cheryl D. Glenn said. “We hope the mayor will do what is best for the city of Baltimore.”

Councilman Zeke Cohen said while the move to out the mayor was “unprecedented,” it is the best course for Baltimore.

Most likely Pugh is finished. Officials at every level have lost confidence in the mayor. It’s likely that she’ll announce her resignation in the coming weeks and or next month.

The breakdown in leadership shows how Baltimore continues to implode.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2U5dB9f Tyler Durden

10-Year Auction Prices Below 2.5% For The First Time Since 2017

Following yesterday’s subpar 3Y auction, today’s 10Y, $24 billion reopening of Cusip 6B1 was nothing short of stellar.

Pricing at a high yield of 2.466%, well below last month’s 2.615%, this was the first bond auction to price below 2.50% since December 2017, and also stopped through the 2.476% When Issued by 0.1 basis point.

The internals were impressive as well: the Bid to Cover of 2.55 dropped from 2.59 last month, but was still above the 2.45 six auction average. Notably, amid concerns that foreigners are stepping away from US paper, Indirects took down a healthy 68.4%, well above the 64.5% recent average, if modestly below last month’s 69.4%. More importantly this was toward the high end of the historical range, with just a few auctions pricing in the 70%+ Indirect range. And with Directs taking down 12.0%, modestly above the six auction average, Dealers were left with 19.6% of the auction, the lowest since March 2017.

Overall, a very strong auction and certainly refuting any speculation that at least in April, foreigners had any particular desire not to participate in US Treasury auctions.

 

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2P1mtfc Tyler Durden

New York City Just Went From Dumb To Dumber…

Authored by Simon Black via SovereignMan.com,

A few months ago, I wrote to you about how New York City wants to tax people who own second homes there.

They call it a pied-a-terre tax, and the geniuses behind it believe that it will help plug the city’s $1 billion budget shortfall.

Bill de Blasio himself, the mayor of New York City, has voiced his enthusiasm in soaking the rich.

Hedge fund manager Ken Griffin became one of the primary victims of this Bolshevik sentiment when he bought a $268 million condo in the city.

It wasn’t enough that Griffin will already pay millions of dollars in property taxes to the city. The pied-a-terre tax would milk him for another $9+ million per year.

(Shockingly, Griffin has recently decided to NOT move his corporate offices from Chicago to New York, as he had previously been considering.)

Real estate agents in New York were rightfully worried the law might crash the luxury market, so they lobbied to shelf the tax.

Lawmakers listened. And then came up with an even dumber idea: the Mansion Tax.

This was just announced last week. So, now, instead of paying the pied-a-terre tax, the Mansion Tax will cost people 4% on the value of luxury homes that they purchase.

(Bear in mind that property buyers in NYC already pay a 1% mansion tax on properties over $1 million, which barely gets you a few hundred square feet in Manhattan…)

This is pretty stupid. These lawmakers understand perfectly well that taxes can be used to influence consumer behavior.

That’s why they tax cigarettes, alcohol, and sugary drinks: they want to discourage people from consuming those products, so they tax them.

Even the child tax credit and spousal benefits can affect people’s behavior, influencing whether or not they have children or get married.

Politicians know that tax policy has significant social influence. So they’re kidding themselves if they don’t think this tax will discourage people from buying real estate in New York.

It’s similar to the way that New York chased Amazon away— a deal that would have created jobs and billions of dollars of income for the city.

The deal with Amazon was a win/win. The city would have had to invest almost NOTHING and receive tremendous benefit in return.

Amazon would have had access to talented employees and a nice tax incentive.

But these Bolsheviks can’t do a win/win deal. They can only structure win/lose deals– they win and you get nothing… otherwise no deal.

And so– people are leaving.

It’s not just New York; New Jersey lost hundreds of millions of its yearly tax revenue when they chased away just one wealthy taxpayer, who relocated to Florida.

But instead of reversing the tax after their mistake, New Jersey RAISED taxes even more to make up for the shortfall.

 What’s even more startling is how POPULAR these policies are.

Even though they are chasing away productive businesses and talented citizens, these Bolshevik politicians are surging in popularity.

The dumber their ideas, the more popular they become.

Roughly HALF of Millennials (who happen to comprise the largest chunk of the population) now identify with socialism. And they love these idiotic, destructive ideas.

Howard Marks, the billionaire founder of Oaktree Capital, who manages $120 billion, commented about this in his recent memo.

“Capitalism can be credited with much of what made the United States what it is today…

And only capitalism is likely to cause the pie to continue to grow. The failure of non-capitalist systems to produce economic growth and prosperity is well-documented.”

He’s right. Every experiment with communism in the history of the world has always failed.

He goes on to quote Winston Churchill:

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal share of blessings… The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”

Sadly, more and more people seem to prefer that outcome.

That’s a big reason why I live in Puerto Rico now: because I know that I can’t change anyone’s mind.

People will continue to believe in the fairy tale of socialism despite so many examples of its utter failure (like Venezuela).

And any rational person should expect this fever to spread…

So have a Plan B. Don’t allow yourself to be victimized by anyone else’s failed ideology.

My Plan B was Puerto Rico. But it was such a compelling Plan B, Puerto Rico became my Plan A.

I live here because Puerto Rico falls outside of the Bolsheviks’ tax jurisdiction; here, you can pay just 4% on qualifying business income, and 0% on certain types of investment income (like capital gains).

And while New York (and other cities) jack up property tax rates, Puerto Rico is offering residents ZERO property tax on qualifying property for several years, as well as tax free gains when you sell your property in the future.

It’s a night and day difference.

Even if the Bolsheviks raise taxes to 80%, or charge idiotic tax penalties on real estate, it won’t affect Puerto Rican residents.

If you don’t have the flexibility to move, there are plenty of other options– like maximizing tax-advantaged contributions to an IRA or 401(k).

Point is, there are plenty of legal means at your disposal to legitimately reduce the damage that they can do to you.

And it makes sense to start taking those steps now while the window of opportunity still exists.

And to continue learning how to ensure you thrive no matter what happens next in the world, I encourage you to download our free Perfect Plan B Guide.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2WUg9c6 Tyler Durden

CNN: Obama Separated Migrant Children ‘For Their Protection’

According to CNN National Security Analyst Samantha Vinograd, former President Obama separated migrant children from their families and stuck them in metal cages “for their protection,” during a panel discussion criticizing President Trump’s border policies. 

After playing a clip in which President Trump points out that the child separation policy began under Obama, CNN‘s Wolf Blitzer said: “The President, in the Oval Office with the Egyptian President, he denied CNN’s reporting and other reporting that he is thinking of reinstating zero-tolerance family separation policy. He repeated this accusation against President Obama. […] [Trump] stopped it after he authorized the zero-tolerance policy.”

Vinograd chimed in: “President Obama, when he separated children from their families, Wolf,  it was for their protection. It was as if there was a risk of trafficking or other kind of harm that might have been incurred. But even if he did do that, why is Donald Trump saying that two wrongs make a right? Again, Obama wasn’t right, but he’s saying that because something is happening under President Obama, he’s repeating it and upping the ante. That’s an incredibly poor excuse. He’s systemized that inhumane treatment that, again, Obama was doing to protect children.

Trump has noted Obama’s caging of children ever since controversy erupted last year when photos of caged migrant children taken during the Obama years were misattributed to the Trump administration

After a laundry list of journalists and public figures angrily tweeted the photo – including CNN’s Hadas Gold, NYT Mag’s editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein, Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau and former LA mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, they deleted their tweets in shame when it emerged that the photo was taken in 2014, under Obama

***

As we noted last July, Trump’s 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale raised a few eyebrows when he tweeted “Over 90,000 kids were detained under Obama. And no one cared.” 

The claim was “debunked” by AP – which published the misleading article: “NOT REAL NEWS: Obama didn’t separate 90,000 migrant families.

For starters, Parscale said detained, not separated. AP then refers to a 2016 Senate subcommittee report that Parscale was referencing in which nearly 90,000 children were ‘placed with sponsors’ under Obama. 

The false claim appears to stem from a January 2016 Senate subcommittee report that investigated how the Department of Health and Human Services, under the Obama administration, placed thousands of unaccompanied children illegally entering the country. 

The subcommittee report found that from October 2013 through 2015 the federal agency placed nearly 90,000 children with a sponsor, after they were detained at the border without a legal guardian. The majority of those sponsors, the report found, were a parent or legal guardian living in the country. –AP

Except the children were ‘thrown in cages’ first…

Taking a look at the Senate subcommittee report AP references (page 8), we see that ICE transfers the children to a facility before they are resettled. 

Meanwhile, the Obama administration’s widespread abuse of detained migrants was sharply condemned by the ACLU and the University of Arizona

One woman interviewed was detained for nearly a month in CADC while she was six months pregnantShe was shackled during transport to and from the facility. At the facility, she was denied monitoring or treatment for an ovarian cyst that posed a risk to herself and the fetus, and received no response to her requests for prenatal vitamins or extra padding for her bed.68 (Her case is described more fully in the box below.) Another woman interviewed was separated from her breastfeeding baby daughter, who was less than two months old, while she was detained in Eloy for two weeks. –University of Arizona

and

Among those findings are that women did not receive adequate medical or mental health care,were often mixed together with women serving criminal sentences, and were often transferred from faraway states. In most cases, researchers found that women were separated from at least one child. –ACLUAZ.org

Also overlooked is the fact that 80% of children entering the United States are separated from their parents when they’re shoved across the border with a human trafficker, and that migrants can seek asylum in the United States through one of the several U.S. consulates in Mexico. 

Furthermore, in 2011, the average stay of an unaccompanied minor in an Obama-admin facility was 72 days, which dropped to 34 days in 2015. In 2018, the average length of time a unaccompanied minor stayed in ORR care was 60 days. 

In fact, if one adds up just the unaccompanied minors taken into custody between 2008 – 2016 (here and here), nearly 300,000 children were placed in federal housing under Obama. 

So to be clear – hundreds of thousands of migrant children whose parents sent them into the United States alone or with a human trafficker remained in Obama administration facilities for up to months at a time, before eventual release or repatriation

Of course, it was for their protection according to CNN

 

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2X2EgWm Tyler Durden

Chinese Car Sales Thrashed In March As Unprecedented Collapse Slump Continues

Car sales in China, the world’s largest vehicle market, continue to tumble, exposing an increasingly ugly picture for the global automotive market. The data marks a dismal and protracted reversal in a market that had done nothing but grow for decades, according to Bloomberg. In March, retail sales of sedans, SUVs, minivans and multipurpose vehicles dropped 12% to 1.78 million units, according to the China Passenger Car Association. This is after an 18.5% drop in February and a 4% drop in January.

The country’s slowing economy and continued trade tensions with the United States are weighing on consumer sentiment among its 1.4 billion people. Additionally, changes in tax policies and import tariffs have also acted as a headwind for car demand. Cars were the only consumer product category in China that shrank the first two months of 2019.

Cui Dongshu, secretary general of the CPCA, is among those calling for more government intervention to spur buying: “There are only 200 million private vehicles in China, leaving huge room for growth. Policies should be put in place to spur vehicle consumption in 2019.” Because as we all know, the government manipulating the market to create demand where there isn’t any could never backfire, right? 

Even better, despite the horrifying data, Cui still thinks that car sales “may recover in April”, helped by the country’s planned tax reductions. He stopped short of predicting sales gains, but PCA raised its forecast for 2019 sales of new energy vehicles – battery, hybrid and fuel cell cars – to 1.7 million from 1.6 million.

With China out of the picture, global automakers like Toyota and Ford are left with few places to go for growth in sales. Markets in Europe and North America continue to slow alongside of China as the availability of car sharing services makes buying less necessary. Japan is also slowing down, while gains in smaller markets are unable to offset growth in larger markets.

Chen Hong, chairman of SAIC Motor, China’s biggest automaker, said: “2019 will bring severe challenges.” Trying to rally his employees in an internal worker memo, he called for his company to “accelerate innovation and strive toward higher quality”. SAIC’s sales fell 17% in the first two months of 2019.

Ford reported a 54% sales plunge in China last year and said last week that it’s introducing more than 30 vehicles targeted specifically for Chinese consumers over the next three years to help it hone its focus on the market

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2G6Lvp3 Tyler Durden

LYFT Plummets 30% From Opening Highs As Uber IPO Process Begins

Lyft shares crashed further to new record lows today following reports that its dominant rival Uber could be filing for an initial public offering as soon as Thursday.

Bloomberg reports that Uber’s offering is expected to be the largest U.S. IPO this year and among the 10 largest of all time, and a person familiar with the matter said the company is seeking to raise about $10 billion. That compares with the $2.3 billion raised when Lyft went public late last month.

“Given the substantial market opportunity and investor interest in the secular ride-sharing opportunity, Lyft will likely benefit from being the only direct publicly traded play on the ride-sharing market,” Susquehanna analyst Shyam Patil said ahead of Lyft’s trading debut. “However, once Uber goes public (expected in the mid-April timeframe), we could see outflows as investors seek to invest in Uber.”

LYFT is now trading down 30% from its post-IPO opening highs…

Going down?

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2uUGVVT Tyler Durden

Farage Says New Brexit Party Will Spark “A Political Revolution” And Terrify The Tories

Nigel Farage declared on Tuesday that it would spark a political “revolution” – a line he apparently stole from US Sen. Bernie Sanders – and strike fear into the hearts of ineffectual Tories who have so far failed to deliver on the promise of the Brexit referendum, the Sun  reports.

Farage

In an interview with the Sun, Farage revealed the official launch of the Brexit Party would take place during an event in Coventry on Friday. He warned that the new party would contest every region in the May 23 European Parliamentary elections, which he believes will happen after the UK receives another Article 50 extension. The party, Farage said, would dedicate itself to fighting back against “the betrayal of democracy” by May and the Tories, though a twitter account for the Brexit Party added that if you supported Brexit, “both parties have failed you.”

Farage’s goal with the Brexit Party is to upend the British two-party system in its current form. His announcement followed remarks from Tory Brexiteer MP Anne Morris, who said she might vote for the Brexit Party if European elections happen.

Confirming he will stand to become an MEP, Mr Farage said the party had been inundated with “just under 1,000” requests from people wanting to be a candidate.

And he told The Sun: “I said in 2013 that UKIP was going to cause an earthquake in British politics and I think we can safely say we did that.”

Farage, who said that he’s already received just under 1,000 requests from people seeking to be candidates, also revealed that he sat down with President Trump last month. He told his audience that the White House has been shocked by the utter disaster of the Tory-led Brexit process, and that it’s a shame lawmakers inside ‘the Westminster Bubble’ have failed to understand the will of the voters, Farage said.

“There are several people in the American administration American administration who are looking on with incredulity that what they thought was a great country suddenly is being humbled by foreign bureaucrats.”

But some of Farage’s most scathing criticism was reserved for Prime Minister Theresa May, whom he declared ‘the worst prime minister in my lifetime,’ as well as the most ‘duplicitous’.

“I can’t believe she has ever been involved in any negotiation of any kind at any point in her life. She is without doubt the worst Prime Minister in my lifetime and the most duplicitous – she says one thing and does the other again and again and again.”

The British people, particularly those who voted for Brexit, are being treated ‘with disdain’, Farage said. And the feeling that the Kingdom’s politics has broken down has become pervasive.

“There is a feeling that politics is broken, the public is being treated with utter disdain. There is a break down in trust between the Government and the governed and I would add to that a feeling that the Government is incompetent. How can it be that 3 years on we have got nowhere?”

Farage quit UKIP – the pro-Brexit party he helped create – late last year because of what he described as its “anti-muslim” fixation. He hopes his new party will “shift the center of gravity” in British politics, just like he did with UKIP, and judging by the latest poll by YouGov, there is indeed increasing disenchantment with the country’s two biggest parties…

Infographic: Voters abandoning Conservative and Labour parties | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2WXDLg0 Tyler Durden