Portland, Maine, Three Towns in Michigan Vote to Legalize Recreational Marijuana

nsfpVoters in Maine’s largest city and in Michigan’s
state capital, Lansing, as well as Ferndale and Jackson have all
approved measures that legalize the recreational use of marijuana
in their jurisdictions. In Lansing, the measure
passed
with 62 percent of the vote—it prohibits the city from
regulating marijuana in amounts under an ounce that is possessed or
used on private property. Lansing’s mayor, Virg Bernero,
supported
the initiative, pointing out that the “public is far
ahead of most politicians on this issue.”

Ferndale’s measure passed
even more resoundingly
, with 69 percent voting in favor. It had
been opposed by nearly all of the city’s political establishment,
and this summer the local police
targeted
one of the main organizers of the initiative, charging
him with “marijuana delivery” and even suggesting where he lives
could render the initiative void even if it passed.  

Jackson’s effort to decriminalize marijuana
passed
with about 61 percent of the vote.

Portland’s initiative,
meanwhile
, decriminalized possession of marijuana in amounts up
to 2.5 ounces but also banned its use in many public places.
Legislators in Maine have been trying to legalize marijuana
statewide. No state has yet legalized marijuana via its
legislature, though
several states
, including Maine, could join Colorado and
Washington in legalizing marijuana next, especially on the 2014
ballot.

Medical marijuana is notionally legal in Michigan and Maine
already.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/06/portland-maine-three-towns-in-michigan-v
via IFTTT

A.M. Links: Terry McAuliffe, Chris Christie, Bill de Blasio Win Elections, Kathleen Sebelius Returns to Capitol Hill, At Least One Dead in China Bomb Blasts

  • w00t puerto ricoDemocrat Terry McAuliffe was
    elected
    governor in a tight race in Virginia, challenging the
    notion the place is a blue state yet, while in traditionally
    Democrat New Jersey Republican Chris Christie
    easily
    won re-election, and Bill de Blasio
    becomes
    the first Democrat to be elected mayor of deep blue New
    York City since David Dinkins in 1989. Will he last as long? In
    other cities, Marty Walsh
    won
    the mayor’s race in Boston, and former prosecutor Mike
    Duggan
    won
    the mayor’s race in Detroit.
  • Kathleen Sebelius will be
    back
    on Capitol Hill to testify more about how she’s
    accountable for Obamacare’s problems and how they’ll be fixed
    anyway.
  • Ladar Levison, who ran the e-mail service used by NSA leaker
    Edward Snowden before being forced by government actions to shut
    down, plans to
    launch
    a surveillance-proof and easy –to-use se-mail service
    next year.
  • At least one person was
    killed
    by a series of bomb blasts outside the Chinese Communist
    Party’s headquarters in the provincial capital of Taiyuan.
  • France is
    not
    planning on delaying its withdrawal from Mali any further
    in the face of a resurgence of violence that included the killing
    of two French journalist.
  • Diplomats from Iran, Israel, other Middle Eastern countries and
    even the US
    reportedly
    met in secret last month to talk about the
    possibility of organizing a conference on the banning of nuclear
    weapons in the region.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on
Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
  You
can also get the top stories mailed to
you—
sign
up here.
 

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/06/am-links-terry-mcauliffe-chris-christie
via IFTTT

Jacob Sullum on the Chemical Weapons Ban That Threatens To Destroy Federalism

After Carol Anne Bond discovered that her husband
had impregnated her best friend, the Pennsylvania microbiologist
took revenge by spreading toxic chemicals on her ex-friend’s car
door, mailbox, and door knob. The poisonous prank was mostly
ineffectual, inflicting nothing worse than a minor thumb burn.
Senior Editor Jacob Sullum says Bond’s prosecution, the focus of
a case the Supreme Court heard yesterday, could do a lot
more damage. Defending its decision to make a federal case out of
what sounds like fodder for a tabloid talk show, the Justice
Department argues that treaties can give Congress new powers.
Sullum says that theory threatens to destroy the constitutional
division of authority between the states and the national
government.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/06/jacob-sullum-on-the-chemical-weapons-ban
via IFTTT

Libertarian Robert Sarvis Pulls 6.6 Percent in Virginia Governor’s Race, Almost Five Times Better Than Gary Johnson Last November

not de blasioIn a race where he was polling with a
double-digit lead
just last week
, Democrat Terry McAuliffe
won
the Virginia governor’s race in a squeaker tonight, with a
margin of victory of
just over
2 percent, receiving 47.6 percent to Republican Ken
Cuccinelli’s 45.42 percent. For libertarians the bigger news might
be that Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis pulled 6.6 percent, or
more than 142,000 votes, five times the vote total Libertarian
presidential candidate Gary Johnson won last November, despite a
significantly lower turnout. Democrats
tried to make
the election against Cuccinelli a referendum on
“Tea Party extremists,” and by that measure they lost; Cuccinelli’s
margin of defeat being about two-thirds the size of Mitt Romney’s
last year.

Cuccinelli supporters called Sarvis a spoiler before the polling
places even opened, with Ron Paul going so far as to say it would
be “insane
for anyone to vote for Sarvis because he expressed support for the
idea of a mileage tax, something the Reason Foundation’s Adrian
Moore believes is worth a try. At campaign rallies, Sarvis pointed
out the tax doesn’t require GPS tracking—a standard odometer
already tracks mileage. Scott Shackford pointed out last week that
Sarvis
drew support both
from Democrats and Republicans, something
that suggests libertarianism’s potency as a catalyst for
coalition-building around issues of freedom. Nevertheless, some
Republicans disappointed by such a close loss are sure to blame
Sarvis anyway, believing his votes “belonged” to the GOP, an
argument Nick Gillespie rightly took down
last week too
.

In the other governor’s race tonight, Libertarian Kenneth Kaplan
won .6 percent of the vote, the same as Gary Johnson last year, in
an election that saw Republican Chris Christie win re-election in a
landslide in the traditionally blue state of New Jersey.

Read Brian Doherty’s interview with Sarvis from last month

here
, and an overview of the Sarvis and Kaplan campaigns from
just yesterday
here
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/06/libertarian-robert-sarvis-pulls-66-perce
via IFTTT

Beverly Hills City Council May Blanketly Ban E-Cigarettes Tonight

Beverly Hills City Council has an urgent matter at hand! At
tonight’s meeting, the council will consider an “interim urgency
ordinance” that will declare a “moratorium of the establishment and
further operation of any electronic cigarette retailer.”
Remarkably, they are giving retailers two weeks notice:

“In order to allow retailers to amortize any investment in
e-cigarettes made before the adoption of the ordinance, retailers
who purchased e-cigarettes for resale prior to the date of adoption
of the ordinance will be able to continue to sell such cigarettes
for a period of two weeks after the adoption of the ordinance.
Selling e-cigarettes beyond the two weeks is a misdemeanor and is
punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for up to
six months, or both.”

Along with the suggested moratorium on vape shops, there is a
separate
agenda
item that will extend all present smoking regulations to
electronic cigarettes. Read the rest of the proposed ordinance

here
.

Proponents of e-cigarettes fear that rash, local legislation
like this will set a precedent that will severly impact the
industry as a whole. For all the reasons that e-cigarettes
shouldn’t be regulated, watch
E-Cigarettes: Second-hand Smoke, Vaping, and the Price of FDA
Regulations
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/05/beverly-hills-city-council-to-blanketly
via IFTTT

Everyone Knows Toronto’s Mayor Is a Drunken Lout, but the Real Scandal Is That He Smoked Crack Once?

Which is more troubling: that
Toronto’s mayor has smoked crack on at least one occasion (as he

admitted
today) or that he attempts to mitigate that
transgression by saying he has a habit of getting so drunk that he
does stuff like that without remembering it? I’d say the latter
should be more worrisome to any Torontonian whose mind is not
clouded by arbitrary pharmacological prejudices. Here is what Mayor
Rob Ford told reporters today, after months of questions prompted
by a video that seemed to show him sucking on a crack pipe:

You asked me a question back in May, and you can repeat that
question. Yes, I have smoked crack cocaine. But no, do I—am I
an addict? No. Have I tried it? Probably, in one of my drunken
stupors, probably approximately about a year ago….

I wasn’t lying—you didn’t ask the correct questions. No, I’m not
an addict, and no, I do not do drugs. I made mistakes in the past,
and all I can do is apologize, but it is what it is….

I don’t even remember. Some of the stuff that you guys have seen
me—the state I’ve been in? It’s a problem.

No kidding. The New York Times notes
“several public occasions during which Mr. Ford acted boorishly and
appeared to be impaired.” Now he is saying—in his own defense, mind
you—that he frequently stumbles around town in a stupor, so what do
you expect? For all we know, smoking crack is the least of what
demon rum has driven him to.

As exercises in blame shifting go, I prefer Marion Barry’s

complaint
, upon being caught on tape in a similarly
embarrassing situation, that the “bitch set me up,” which had the
virtue of being true. By contrast, Ford says he “probably” did what
he is shown doing on video and furthermore that it was “about a
year ago,” but he can’t really be sure, what with all the
out-of-control drinking. He combines that wishy-washy confession
with a Clintonian claim that he spoke the literal truth when he
misled the public. At least Ford did not say that he lit the pipe
but did not inhale.

Still, despite crack’s fearsome reputation as a drug that
inevitably enslaves its users, there is littlle reason to doubt
Ford’s assertion that his not an crack addict. As I noted yesterday
in my Forbes column,
the vast majority of crack users do not become heavy consumers, and
those who do typically cut back or stop on their own. According to
the National
Survey on Drug Use and Health
, just 3 percent of Americans who
have tried this supposedly irresistible and inescapable drug have
smoked it in the last month. Furthermore, research by Columbia
neuropsychopharmacologist Carl Hart shows that even heavy users can
moderate their behavior in response to incentives—something Ford
evidently has trouble doing with respect to alcohol. If a drug is
interfering with Ford’s ability to do his job, that drug does not
seem to be crack.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/05/everyone-knows-torontos-mayor-is-a-drunk
via IFTTT

Everyone Knows Toronto's Mayor Is a Drunken Lout, but the Real Scandal Is That He Smoked Crack Once?

Which is more troubling: that
Toronto’s mayor has smoked crack on at least one occasion (as he

admitted
today) or that he attempts to mitigate that
transgression by saying he has a habit of getting so drunk that he
does stuff like that without remembering it? I’d say the latter
should be more worrisome to any Torontonian whose mind is not
clouded by arbitrary pharmacological prejudices. Here is what Mayor
Rob Ford told reporters today, after months of questions prompted
by a video that seemed to show him sucking on a crack pipe:

You asked me a question back in May, and you can repeat that
question. Yes, I have smoked crack cocaine. But no, do I—am I
an addict? No. Have I tried it? Probably, in one of my drunken
stupors, probably approximately about a year ago….

I wasn’t lying—you didn’t ask the correct questions. No, I’m not
an addict, and no, I do not do drugs. I made mistakes in the past,
and all I can do is apologize, but it is what it is….

I don’t even remember. Some of the stuff that you guys have seen
me—the state I’ve been in? It’s a problem.

No kidding. The New York Times notes
“several public occasions during which Mr. Ford acted boorishly and
appeared to be impaired.” Now he is saying—in his own defense, mind
you—that he frequently stumbles around town in a stupor, so what do
you expect? For all we know, smoking crack is the least of what
demon rum has driven him to.

As exercises in blame shifting go, I prefer Marion Barry’s

complaint
, upon being caught on tape in a similarly
embarrassing situation, that the “bitch set me up,” which had the
virtue of being true. By contrast, Ford says he “probably” did what
he is shown doing on video and furthermore that it was “about a
year ago,” but he can’t really be sure, what with all the
out-of-control drinking. He combines that wishy-washy confession
with a Clintonian claim that he spoke the literal truth when he
misled the public. At least Ford did not say that he lit the pipe
but did not inhale.

Still, despite crack’s fearsome reputation as a drug that
inevitably enslaves its users, there is littlle reason to doubt
Ford’s assertion that his not an crack addict. As I noted yesterday
in my Forbes column,
the vast majority of crack users do not become heavy consumers, and
those who do typically cut back or stop on their own. According to
the National
Survey on Drug Use and Health
, just 3 percent of Americans who
have tried this supposedly irresistible and inescapable drug have
smoked it in the last month. Furthermore, research by Columbia
neuropsychopharmacologist Carl Hart shows that even heavy users can
moderate their behavior in response to incentives—something Ford
evidently has trouble doing with respect to alcohol. If a drug is
interfering with Ford’s ability to do his job, that drug does not
seem to be crack.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/05/everyone-knows-torontos-mayor-is-a-drunk
via IFTTT

Illinois House Approves Gay Marriage

The Illinois
House has voted 61-54 to allow same-sex marriage. The measure will
be sent back to the Senate to have the effective date changed.

Governor Pat Quinn has said he will sign the bill into law.

From the
AP
:

A historic vote Thursday in the Illinois House positioned that
state to become the largest in the heartland to legalize gay
marriage, following months of arduous lobbying efforts by both
sides in President Barack Obama’s home state.

Lawmakers voted 61-54 to send the measure back to the Senate to
change the bill’s effective date, just a technical change since the
chamber already approved the measure in February. The measure will
then head to Gov. Pat Quinn, who has pledged to sign it into the
law.

Follow these stories and more at Reason 24/7 and don’t forget you
can e-mail stories to us at 24_7@reason.com and tweet us
at @reason247

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/05/illinois-house-approves-gay-marriage
via IFTTT