Outrage After Swedish TV Downplays Gruesome ISIS Beheadings, Threatens Prison For Sharing Video

Swedish state broadcaster SVT has outraged viewers after they ran an article claiming that the gruesome ISIS-inspired murder of two Scandinavian girls in Morocco “had nothing to do with Islam,” before warning Swedes that sharing a graphic beheading video of the incident could result in up to four years of imprisonment

Maren Ueland, 28, of Norway and Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, of Denmark were murdered while backpacking in the High Atlas mountains of Morocco. Both girls were stabbed multiple times, while one of them was beheaded on video. The culprits can then be seen pledging allegiance to the Islamic State leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi. 

The ISIS fanatics gloated about the killing – while images of the killing were posted to the Facebook page of Ueland’s mother, and the video was sent via Private Message to Ms. Jesperson’s friends, according to the Daily Mail

The clip, in which a suspected ISIS terrorist shouts ‘it’s Allah’s will’, was also sent to friends of Ms Jespersen via ‘private messenger’, it has been claimed.

It has since been revealed that horrific images of the slain tourists have been posted on the Facebook page of Ms Ueland’s mother Irene. Some Moroccans bizarrely posted the images in a misguided bid to express sympathy along with calls for the killers to be executed. 

Earlier, it was claimed that footage itself had been sent to friends of Ms Jespersen. While it is not clear exactly who sent them the footage, there will be strong suspicions it would have been from warped ISIS sympathisers. –Daily Mail

A total of 19 people have been arrested in connection with the murders, according to The Washington Postafter the hikers’ bodies were discovered in their tent in a remote area of the Atlas mountains. 

During a Christmas Eve report on the murders SVT made no mention of the fact that one of the women was beheaded, nor the ISIS link, called their injuries “knife damage,” yet warned viewers of the legal risks of sharing the video of the incident. 

“We have got very good legislation in place called unlawful infringement. This law is aimed at just this kind of case when someone spreads information or images of somebody in a vulnerable position,” said former prosecutor Sven-Erik Alhem to SVT

A subsequent written version of the murders on SVT‘s website does mention a link to Islamic terrorism. 

According to one Twitter user (translated): “To sum up SVT’s coverage of the Muslim terrorist attack in Morocco and Daesh ‘warriors’: 1) You’ll be sent to prison if you spread the beheading film, you racist Nazi! 2) Daesh warriors have returned home to Sweden 3) They died of knife wounds, sort of 4) The murder in Morocco has nothing to do with Islam!” 

 “I myself would never watch such a film, let alone share it. But now we are more upset about the crime of proliferation than the crime of beheading,” wrote another Twitter user (translated). 

Another user ridiculed SVT, tweeting: “225 years ago Marie Antoinette suffered ‘knife damage to her neck’ during the French Revolution.”  

Journalist Ingrid Carlqvist noted (translated): “Have now seen this very strange report. A new law that has been created to protect, say, rape victims from having films of the crime spread, is now being applied to the beheading clip of the Danish and Norwegian girls in Morocco.” 

via RSS http://bit.ly/2RgWtQH Tyler Durden

Mollie Tibbetts’ Mom Takes in the Son of Undocumented Immigrants

|||Poweshiek County Emergency Management Agency/FacebookFollowing a national search, the parents of 20-year-old Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts received devastating news. Their daughter’s body had been found with suspected stab wounds a month after she went missing. Cristhian Bahena Rivera, a 24-year-old undocumented immigrant, was arrested in connection with her murder. Now, four months after Rivera’s arrest, the Tibbetts family has taken in the teenage child of undocumented immigrants.

The Washington Post reports that Tibbetts’ mother, Laura Calderwood, has taken in the 17-year-old son of immigrants so that he can finish high school. Scott, Calderwood’s son and Tibbett’s younger brother, is a senior at a Brooklyn, Iowa, high school. His friend, Ulises, was born to Mexican immigrants. His parents fled the area in fear following Rivera’s arrest. Ulises wanted to stay in the town, the only one he had ever known, and finish high school.

Calderwood took Ulises in to her home and agreed to treat him like she would her own son.

Prior to the decision, the Tibbetts family repeatedly asked for their daughter’s death to not be used as a political prop. Several family members took to social media to condemn anti-immigrant spin. Her father wrote an article asking for her death not to be politicized. He also sent assurances to the Hispanic community, writing, “That you’ve been beset by the circumstances of Mollie’s death is wrong.” One aunt said, “Evil comes in EVERY color,” on Facebook. A cousin tweeted at a conservative commentator to tell her to “stop being a fucking snake and using my [cousin’s] death as political propaganda.”

Despite the family’s pleas, many immigration hardliners sought to use her death to justify the expansion of anti-immigrant policies. Statistics show that Rivera’s alleged actions are an outlier. Even immigration restrictionists like the Center for Immigration Studies have even admitted that a “lot of data does suggest immigrants are less likely to be involved in crime.”

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2Rku38k
via IFTTT

Stocks Soar Then Slide Following Epic Pension Buying Fake Out

It almost went according to plan.

In what was a relatively quiet market until 2pm suddenly the Dow Jones blasted higher, supported by a burst of massive buy programs, when as noted earlier we observed the highest TICK print on record, and at 2:39pm, the number of NYSE upticks surpassed downticks by a record 1,775…

… and not just one massive buy program, but we got no less than three 1,650+ TICK prints in a space of 10 minutes as one trader tried to fake the arrival of a pension bid as other traders scrambled to figure out if pension buying had indeed returned for the third day in a row.

There was just one problem, because whoever was desperate to pretend they were a pension fund forgot to sell bonds and with the S&P trading at session highs, treasurys remained unchanged…

…in stark contrast with yesterday’s true pension reallocation, which saw TSY yields slide as stocks jumped.

And once traders realized that this was just one giant fake out meant to force stops and squeeze shorts, they started buying… bonds, with the 10Y yield sliding as low as 2.7146%, the lowest since February 2018. And as the bond were bid, stocks tumbled losing all intraday gains, and turning negative.

Meanwhile, as it became clear that no real pension bid was coming, the selling returned, and stocks closed near session lows, with the Dow losing almost 400 points of gains and briefly dropping below 23,000 although the selloff was far more controlled than the liquidation puke observed on Monday.

Back to Treasurys, where buying across the curve was not uniform, and while 30Y yields were almost unchanged, the short end crumbled, resulting in a sharp curve steepening.

Another confirmation that there was no real pension bid today, the dollar not only did not slide as it did yesterday, but was mostly unchanged if slightly higher on the day.

Meanwhile, despite the unchanged inventory print in today’s DOE report (vs expectations of a 3+  MM drawdown) and yesterday’s API inventory build, oil rose modestly cementing December’s 11% plunge for the commodity, and the worst quarterly drop since 2014.

With the dollar going nowhere, gold and silver were mostly unchanged, and as a result have enjoyed one of the best months for the precious metals in years.

Meanwhile credit, as we noted earlier, did not buy either the Wednesday record point surge, or Thursday’s biggest intraday reversal since 2010, and instead  investment-grade bond spreads widened 3 basis points to 171bps, having widened every day since Dec. 14 and most trading sessions this quarter while junk bond also dropped as the high yield index widened 1 basis point to 531 basis points, the highest level since Aug. 4, 2016.

The average junk bond yield now above 8% for the first time since April 2016.

Finally, in what may be the biggest unspoken story of the day, the LSTA leveraged loan index tumbled to new multi-year lows: as shown below, the price of leveraged loans has been a one way train down, which together with another week of record outflows from the loan market, is the most ominous signal because should the loan market freeze up, 2019 will be nothing short of a credit disaster as billions of M&A and LBO deals lock up.

via RSS http://bit.ly/2QVYT7V Tyler Durden

Texas School Acknowledges It Cannot Force Students to Stand for the Pledge of Allegiance

Kids reciting pledgeSchool district officials in Texas have settled with a student who sued for her right not to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. The Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District has acknowledged her right to sit and promises to inform future students that they also have the right to refuse to stand, according to the Houston Chronicle.

India Landry, a student at Windfern High School in Harris County, Texas, was expelled from the school because she refused to stand for the pledge, showing her support for NFL players who had been kneeling to protest police violence. She sued last fall, arguing that the expulsion was racially motivated and violated her constitutional rights.

Supreme Court precedents appear to be entirely on her side with rulings going all the way back to 1943. Public schools can’t force students to stand for or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. It’s compelled speech that violates the student’s First Amendment rights.

But apparently the school district put a policy in place where students were required to get official written permission from their parents in order to refuse to stand for the pledge. That’s not how the First Amendment works, but in any event Landry’s mother has supported her this whole time.

The fight became a national news story because Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton publicly took the school district’s side in defiance of years of Constitutional law. He quoted precedents from Supreme Court decisions on the school district’s behalf, but very strangely, the case he cited saw the Supreme Court uphold a citizen’s right to desecrate the flag.

In any event, it’s terrible that it took so much time, effort, and attention for the school district to acknowledge that it has no authority to force students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2QYdfVp
via IFTTT

Southern California Home Sales Plunge 12% In November As Prices Peak

Southern California home sales plunged in November from a year earlier, while prices increased at the slowest pace in three years amid a housing market slowdown, reported Los Angeles Times.

 The 12% decline in November sales from a year earlier was the fourth consecutive monthly drop for the eight southern counties, including Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Ventura.

The decline in sales for 2018 is still less pronounced than in 2014. Across the eight counties, the median price is still rising — 3.5% from November 2017, to $522,750, but the trend is starting to plateau.

Some housing markets experts are not convinced that a housing bust is materializing. “The housing market is slowing, but…a slowdown does not mean the sky is falling,” said Aaron Terrazas, an economist with Zillow.

LA Times noted if volatility in the stock market and Washington significantly affects consumer confidence and business investment decisions in 2019, the housing market could be due for significant correction into 2020. However, for now, Terrazas and other economists believe the factors that have led to past housing market crashes in Southern California are not visible.

While some economists do not expect a crash, Bank of America rang the proverbial bell on the broader US real estate market in September, warning existing home sales have peaked, reflecting declining affordability, greater price reductions and deteriorating housing sentiment. 

“Call your realtor,” the BofA note proclaimed: “We are calling it: existing home sales have peaked.”

Richard K. Green, director of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, told the LA Times, he is very pessimistic about the housing situation in Southern California.

Green warns prices could plunge 5% to 10% into 2020, even with the current level of economic growth. He argues a similar tune that was said in BofA’s recent housing note: the affordability crisis is topping out the market.

Here are other factors pushing homes further out of reach of Americans:  “The tax law President Trump signed last year limited the amount of deductions for property tax and mortgage interest. Meanwhile, mortgage rates are elevated. The average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 4.55% this week, according to Freddie Mac. That’s down from a recent high of 4.94%, but it’s far higher than the 3.99% level of a year ago,” LA Times said.

There are signs across Southern California that suggest buyers are holding back. 

In Los Angeles County, the median time on the market increased from 41 days in November 2017 to 45 days last month, according to online brokerage Redfin. Moreover, the number of listings with price reductions jumped from 15.9% to 22.2%.

Real estate agents have said buyers have been concern about buying a home as many see the housing market shifting in real time. 

“People are sidelining themselves,” said San Fernando Valley real estate agent Jaswant Singh.

On Thursday, more evidence showed a downward shift in the market. Real estate firm CoreLogic reported a 12% decline in November sales, with the annual rise in the median price coming in at the slowest pace since 2015. 

Southern California median price slipped 0.4% from October and is now $14,250 below the all-time high reached from summer. Inventory is now flooding the market as S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller index shows a sharp deceleration in price appreciation. 

These are the markings of a turning point in the Southern California real estate market. What comes next you might ask? Well, the start of downward momentum in prices – likely to start in 2019 as the US economy is expected to rapidly slow. 

via RSS http://bit.ly/2AiCoji Tyler Durden

17 Times People Freaked Out Over Weed in 2018

All things considered, 2018 has been a pretty good year for weed in the United States. As Reason‘s Scott Shackford noted yesterday, Michigan and Vermont both legalized marijuana for recreational use, while Oklahoma, Utah, and Missouri all approved medical marijuana use. Plus, many places are working on expunging the criminal records of those convicted for marijuana-related crimes. And according to a Gallup poll from October, 66 percent of Americans support marijuana legalization.

But it hasn’t been all good, man. Around the country, there are policymakers and law enforcement officials who want to keep arresting cannabis users, growers, and sellers, and some of them will say just about anything to preserve the status quo.

Here are 17 of 2018’s most ridiculous overreactions to weed:

1. Kansas state rep: Pot is illegal because of African Americans’ “character makeup” and “genetics.”

Kansas state Rep. Steve Alford (R–District 124) started poorly and just kept digging. “Any way you say it, marijuana is an entry drug into the higher drugs,” he said in January. (Spoiler: No, it’s not.) “What you really need to do is go back in the ’30s, when they outlawed all types of drugs…What was the reason why they did that?” he asked.

“One of the reasons why, I hate to say it, was that the African Americans, they were basically users and they basically responded the worst off to those drugs just because of their character makeup, their genetics and that. And so basically what we’re trying to do is we’re trying to do a complete reverse with people not remembering what has happened in the past.”

Everyone in this blog is now dumber for having read that. Sad fact: Blacks and whites currently consume marijuana at similar rates, but blacks are much more likely to be arrested for it.

2. Jeff Sessions falsely claims that opioid addiction starts with weed.

At a Heritage Foundation event in February, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions claimed weed is a gateway drug to prescription opioid and heroin addiction. “We don’t think illegal drug use is ‘recreation.’ Lax enforcement, permissive rhetoric and the media have undermined the essential need to say no to drug use,” he said. Sessions went on to point out the relationship between prescription opioid abuse and heroin addiction. “We think a lot of this is starting with marijuana and other drugs, too,” he added.

At the time, Reason‘s C.J. Ciaramella took note of six studies that say otherwise. You can read about them here.

3. Rep. Joe Kennedy (D–Mass.) suggests legalizing weed would make it harder for authorities to conduct questionable searches.

Before he came out in support of weed legalization last month, Kennedy was not shy about his concerns. Namely, that it would be harder for prosecutors to try cases where cops searched a defendant’s car because they smelled weed. “When we decriminalized” weed in Massachusetts, Kennedy told Vox‘s Ezra Klein in April, “it actually had a pretty big consequence for the way that Massachusetts prosecutors went about trying cases in terms of—because an odor of marijuana was, at last initially, because marijuana was an illegal substance, if you smelled it in a car, you could search a car.”

“When it became decriminalized you couldn’t do that,” he added. “So that was the way that we hadn’t—the base case that prosecutors used to search cars for under cover contraband, guns, knives, a whole bunch of other stuff, all of that got thrown out the window.”

To paraphrase: The problem with legalizing weed is that it gives police one less reason to harass you.

4. Illinois police dog trainer: Legal weed could force us to kill our drug dogs.

On the list of bad reasons to keep marijuana illegal, this has to rank near the top. According to Chad Larner, training director of a police K-9 academy in Illinois, many K-9 units aren’t trained to be social. As a result, legal weed could leave them with little to do, meaning they’d have to be euthanized, as Larner said in May.

Larner’s comments sparked a firestorm of controversy. His boss, Decatur Police Chief James Getz, had to assure the Chicago Tribune that “it was a bad choice of words” and that “there are so many uses for these dogs.”

5. NYPD officer says lax enforcement of marijuana laws makes him afraid to arrest people for no reason.

It’s borderline incomprehensible, but make what you will of this tweet sent out by a New York Police Department (NYPD) union in May:

The officer’s complaint appeared to stem from an announcement earlier in the month that the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office would stop prosecuting marijuana possession cases. Also, the New York Daily News had reported that NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio was getting ready to tell the NYPD not to arrest people for smoking weed. As Shackford noted, the man in the photo didn’t appear to be harming anyone. The officer seemed to simply be upset that he could no longer arrest people for minding their own business.

6. Michigan police took an 80-year-old great grandmother to jail because her medical marijuana card had expired.

A Clare County sheriff’s deputy showed up at 80-year-old Delores Saltzman’s porch in June for completely unrelated reasons (Saltzman’s great granddaughter had lost her phone and ID). But she smelled weed, and Saltzman’s explanation—that she was a medical marijuana patient with an expired recommendation—wasn’t good enough. Saltzman was handcuffed and hauled off to jail for the night.

The charges were eventually dropped after Saltzman renewed her medical marijuana card. Still, it’s highly troubling that the deputy didn’t have the common sense not to arrest a harmless octogenarian for having cannabis in her own home.

7. Pennsylvania police killed a man with a bulldozer over 10 marijuana plants.

In July, Pennsylvania State Police found a 10-plant marijuana “grow” operation on state lands, along with two suspects. When one of the suspects fled into the brush, a trooper commandeered a bulldozer and tried to follow him. At one point, the trooper told the worker driving to stop, which is when they found the suspect’s body underneath the bulldozer.

The death was clearly accidental. However, it would not have happened if police had not chased the man with a piece of construction equipment over some weed.

8. New Jersey politician warns that if pot is legalized, dispensaries will sell “sex toy oils with marijuana.”

A quick Google search reveals that people have indeed tried infusing sex toy oils with marijuana. New Jersey state Sen. Ron Rice (D–District 28) seemed to think this is a problem. If weed is legalized for recreational use in the state, Rice told NJTV in July, there will “be stores that do retail selling of cupcakes with marijuana, candies with marijuana, sex toy oils with marijuana, lipsticks with marijuana—all those kinds of products that kids can get and people can get.”

In an email to the Washington Examiner, he said he was worried about “marijuana infused oils, not toys.” Though one has to wonder why he made the connection between sex toys and marijuana oils in the first place.

9. California police chief says legal weed could lead to “arrests and homicides.”

The majority of cities and counties in the state have banned weed sales since Colorado legalized recreational marijuana. A proposal currently under consideration could remedy this, as it would allow marijuana businesses to deliver weed straight to people’s doorsteps, even in places where it’s illegal to sell pot.

But Morgan Hill Police Chief David Swing, president of the California Police Chiefs Association (CPCA), is not a fan. “This will make it easier and more lucrative to rob a delivery person than a liquor store,” Swing told the Los Angeles Times in September, explaining that the proposal would permit delivery drivers to carry as much as $10,000 in cash apiece. “Robberies are the tip of the iceberg. They can lead to other crimes, including aggravated assaults and homicides.”

The possibility that delivery drivers will be robbed of cash is a great reason to legalize cannabis banking, which would allow them to conduct transactions the way Uber does. It is a terrible reason to prohibit people from buying pot.

10. Heroic Florida cops prevent a beach-comber from scoring some free weed.

Back in September, roughly 100 pounds of weed mysteriously washed up on several Florida beaches. After Robert Kelley and others tried to take some of the weed off one of the beaches, an onlooker called police. The cops showed up and eventually found 11 pounds of marijuana in Kelley’s car. They arrested him and accused him on Facebook of stealing, even though the weed’s real owner had yet to come forward. As Reason‘s Zuri Davis sarcastically pointed out, local residents were able to “sleep soundly…knowing that a hardened beach-comber is off the streets.”

11. New Jersey sheriff slams black people for smoking weed.

After New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy was sworn into office, Bergen County Sheriff Michael Saudino disparaged the new governor’s January inauguration speech, particularly taking issue with his views on criminal justice reform.

“[Murphy] talked about the whole thing, the marijuana, sanctuary state…better criminal justice reform,” Saudino said. “Christ almighty, in other words let the blacks come in, do whatever the fuck they want, smoke their marijuana, do this, do that, and don’t worry about it. You know, we’ll tie the hands of cops.”

Little did Saudino know that his words were caught on tape. His rant was eventually made public in September, prompting him to resign.

12. Jamaican musician gets eight-year sentence for weed he says he bought legally.

After being busted last year while driving though Mississippi with three pounds of weed, Jamaican-American musician Patrick Beadle claimed he had bought the marijuana legally in Oregon. He was eventually charged with drug trafficking (despite little evidence) and convicted in July. In October, Beadle was sentenced to eight years behind bars without the possibility of parole.

Even if Beadle had bought the marijuana illegally and planned to sell it, eight years is a disproportionately long sentence. He did not harm a person nor damage any property. Yet he and his family will lose nearly a decade of his life for the high crime of traveling through the wrong state with several pounds of dried plant matter in his car.

13. Don’t legalize weed because, well, children!

A tavern owner in Staten Island, New York, is worried that legalizing marijuana for recreational use will “be a disaster.” In an October op-ed for SILive.com, Larry Liedy said he was concerned about the creation of “a drug culture I don’t think we are ready for.”

“Young people in their early teens, and even younger, will be blatantly subjected to people smoking pot around them. They will be subjected to dealers looking to entice them into the drug world,” he wrote. “Do our kids really need more negative influences?”

Liedy also expressed concern that when legal dispensaries close at night, black market “dealers will be out in full force.” His argument makes complete sense as long as you don’t think about it. “Dealers will be able to raise their prices twice as much as the legal clinics because of the desire and the need to get high. This will create a major profitable black market for the sellers,” he wrote. “This creates a field day for the suppliers. Other countries, like Canada, Cuba and Mexico, will be importing illegal marijuana to our borders and ports. We now have a drug culture. Our children will now be in jeopardy.”

That’s not quite accurate. As Reason‘s Jacob Sullum pointed out in 2014, survey data from Colorado showed that marijuana legalization did not lead teenagers to smoke more pot. And while it’s conceivable that legalized weed could lead to increased underage consumption in some places, that’s still no reason to ban it. As Sullum argued in 2016: “If Americans were denied access to everything that is appropriate only for adults, we would all be reduced to the status of children.”

14. NASA ordered a SpaceX safety probe because Elon Musk smoked some weed.

In September, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk took a hit from a joint during an appearance on comedian Joe Rogan’s podcast. He wasn’t breaking the law, as the podcast is taped in California. But his behavior “rankled” some high-level officials at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), The Washington Post reported last month. The paper said his actions “prompted the agency to take a close look at the culture of” two companies it contracts with: Musk’s SpaceX, as well as Boeing.

It’s unclear why the safety probe was even necessary. There’s no evidence to suggest that Musk or any of his SpaceX employees go to work high. Plus, Musk was merely lighting up (and legally doing so) on his own time. Had he done the same in private (maybe he does, who knows?), NASA probably wouldn’t have found out or cared.

15. Comical report says the financial costs of marijuana legalization far outweigh the benefits.

“For every dollar gained in tax revenue,” Colorado Christian University’s Centennial Institute claimed in a report last month, “Coloradans spent approximately $4.50 to mitigate the effects of legalization.”

There are a host of reasons why the report is misleading, which you can read about here.

16. Florida’s Joe Arpaio says weed is killing people every day.

Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd declared on Fox & Friends earlier this month that marijuana is killing people daily. “There absolutely is a price to pay for pot,” he said. “It’s not a minor, nonviolent felony. It’s ruining families and killing people every day across the United States.”

Judd provided no evidence to back up his claim, probably because there isn’t any. Though it’s possible to overdose on weed, the Drug Enforcement Agency said in 2017 that “no deaths from overdose of marijuana have been reported.” Judd made some other cringeworthy claims during the segment, which is really worth a watch if you need a laugh. You can read more about it here.

17. Michigan police stole a woman’s car over $10 worth of weed.

In July, Crystal Sisson of Detroit visited a medical marijuana dispensary and bought about $10 worth of weed. It didn’t take long for Wayne County Sheriff’s deputies, who had watched her go in, to pull her over. The cops found the weed and issued her a citation for “illegally occupying a place where controlled substances are sold.” They also seized her car, which she had to pay $1,200 to get back. Earlier this month, Sisson filed a civil lawsuit against Wayne County, alleging that her rights had been violated.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2LI9oWI
via IFTTT

Massive New Migrant Caravan To Leave Honduras; Overloaded El Paso Faces Imminent “Crisis” 

A new, larger migrant caravan is set to leave Honduras on Jan. 15 according to Spanish-language media and migrant rights advocates. 

They say they are even bigger and stronger than the last caravan,” according to Irma Garrido of migrant advocacy group Reactiva Tijuana Foundation. 

News of the new caravan comes as thousands of Central American migrants from an October caravan remain stranded at various cities along the US-Mexico border as they face wait times of up to several months for the United States to process their asylum requests. What’s more, if migrants cannot justify their asylum claims, they may be denied. 

Coordinators who helped direct the migrants on the 2,000-mile trek with bullhorns, arranging for buses and giving advice along the way, have mostly vanished. Many of the migrants say they feel abandoned and unsure where to turn next. Some are ready to return home.

Garrido said this new, larger caravan will probably be joined by more people in El Salvador and in Guatemala, but she said they don’t plan on coming straight to the Tijuana-San Diego border, where resources are already stretched nearly to a breaking point. –LA Times

“They will stay in the south of Mexico in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Their aim is to request work there,” said Garrido. 

Meanwhile, an incoming congresswoman of the Texas border city of El Paso has warned of an imminent “crisis” as the city scrambles to accommodate at least 1,600 migrants dumped by federal authorities over the last several days. The issue is that the entire town is packed to the brim with fans attending the Sun Bowl college football game El Paso has hosted since 1935. 

“We’re facing a real crisis coming up … to find places for all of these (migrant) families,” said Democratic representative-elect Veronica Escobar.

Escobar said migrants who can’t be housed in shelters have been staying in hotel rooms paid by Annunciation House, the non-profit spearheading the efforts to house and feed them. But, she said, if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continues releasing large numbers of migrants, the El Paso community will struggle to find places for them because many hotels have been booked by people attending Monday’s game.

Escobar added it’s already been “very, very difficult and very challenging” to put up the migrants dropped off by ICE. And, she said, the coming hotel crunch will only make the task tougher. –CBS News

During a Thursday bilingual press conference, Annunciation House Executive Director Ruben Garcia announced that US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had dropped off over 1,600 migrants in El Paso since Sunday – and that Wednesay’s delivery of 500 migrants was the largest he’s seen. On Thursday, around 320 more were taken to El Paso. 

According to ICE, they had to release the migrants due to overcrowding in their holding facilities as well as concerns over laws governing how long families can remain detained by immigration authorities. A spokesman for the agency told CBS that they have been notifying local officials before dropping the groups off, however charities have told the agency that they are having trouble accommodating the migrants. 

“We are living through an immigration crisis that is in part driven by a disastrous ruling by a district court judge in the Ninth Circuit that incentives illegal alien adults to put their children in the hands of smugglers and traffickers. The Flores Settlement Agreement has created an immigration loophole that rewards parents for bringing their children with them to the United States,” said Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokeswoman Katie Waldman in a statement emailed to CBS on Friday. 

Escobar called on the Trump administration to help El Paso by undertaking the “short-term” solution of investing in “family-friendly” holding facilities for migrants. “This really is a federal obligation and the federal government needs to step in and build some temporary housing facilities, in the way that they did in 2016,” she said. “That needs to happen immediately.”

The long-term solution, she added, is to invest heavily in the “Northern Triangle” of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to curb the region’s widespread poverty and intensifying gang violence. –CBS News

“We need to work with Central America and make probably some significant investments there and hopefully, through good collaboration, find some solutions to the poverty and crime that are driving thousands and thousands of people from Central America into the United States,” said Escobar. 

via RSS http://bit.ly/2BJ7noy Tyler Durden

The Best TV* of 2018: New at Reason

TV setsAs 2018 comes to a close, television critic Glenn Garvin lists his top shows of the year and notes that we may reaching the tipping point where we shift away from how we used to watch:

Pick the news of your choice: It was the first year there were more scripted series online than on broadcast TV (160 to 146). The first year streaming networks dominated the prime-time Emmys (Netflix and Amazon a total of 12 awards; HBO, Showtime and the five broadcast nets, eight.) The year the number of cable cord-cutters hit 33 million, a jump of about a third in just about a year.

What it all adds up to is that the days of television as we’ve known it, both broadcast and cable, are numbered—and probably just barely into the double digits. The industry recognizes it and took steps both big and small in 2018 to cut itself in on the streaming jackpot.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2Q5wNSd
via IFTTT

Cohen Prague Claim Crumbles As McClatchy Reporter Admits To Third-Hand Information

A Thursday report claiming that former Trump attorney Michael Cohen was in Prague during the 2016 US election has begun to unravel after one of its authors admitted it was based on third-hand information which nobody affiliated with the report had seen, according to the Daily Caller‘s Chuck Ross. 

In a Thursday evening interview, McClatchy‘s Greg Gordon revealed that he and his colleague, Peter Stone, had not actually seen the underlying evidence that a phone traced to Cohen “briefly sent signals ricocheting off cell towers in the Prague area in late summer 2016,” a report which echoed their April claim that special counsel Robert Mueller had evidence of Cohen’s trip – which, according to the controversial “Steele Dossier” was to meet with Kremlin insiders to arrange payments to Russian hackers. 

“Is there anything that you were able to physically see for yourselves?” asked MSNBC host Joy Reid, to which Gordon replied “I wish we had. We held out for a while for that, and it came a time when we thought we had a critical mass. It is a competitive business.”

Instead, Gordon talked about his sources, who “have government sources” and “trusted intelligence-type sources” – dodging the question of whether his sources had even seen the evidence from their sources. 

“Some of the sources have government sources, and some of the sources are people who have told us that they have trusted intelligence-type sources that they get information from. We don’t know the specifics, but we have used these sources on many subjects, and they have been very accurate.”

Both Cohen and his attorney – longtime Clinton pal Lanny Davis, have vehemently denied the Prague claims in the dossier – while Washington Post reporter Greg Miller told an audience at an October event that the FBI and CIA did not believe that former longtime Trump attorney Michael Cohen visited Prague during the 2016 election to pay off Russia-linked hackers who stole emails from key Democrats, reports the Daily Caller‘s Chuck Ross. 

“We’ve talked to sources at the FBI and the CIA and elsewhere — they don’t believe that ever happened,” said Miller during the October event which aired Saturday on C-SPAN. 

We literally spent weeks and months trying to run down… there’s an assertion in there that Michael Cohen went to Prague to settle payments that were needed at the end of the campaign. We sent reporters to every hotel in Prague, to all over the place trying to – just to try to figure out if he was ever there, and came away empty. -Greg Miller

Steele, using Kremlin sources, claimed in his dossier that Cohen and three associates went to Prague in August 2016 to meet with Kremlin officials for the purpose of discussing “deniable cash payments” made in secret so as to cover up “Moscow’s secret liaison with the TRUMP team.” 

Cohen’s alleged Prague visit captured attention largely because the former Trump fixer has vehemently denied it, and also because it would seem to be one of the easier claims in Steele’s 35-page report to validate or invalidate.

Debate over the salacious document was reignited when McClatchy reported April 15 that special counsel Robert Mueller had evidence Cohen visited Prague. No other news outlets have verified the reporting, and Cohen denied it at the time.

Cohen last denied the dossier’s allegations in late June, a period of time when he was gearing up to cooperate with prosecutors against President Donald Trump. Cohen served as a cooperating witness for prosecutors in both New York and the special counsel’s office. –Daily Caller

One day after Cohen pleaded guilty in New York to a slew of federal charges Lanny Davis – that Cohen had ever been to Prague, told Bloomberg “Thirteen references to Mr. Cohen are false in the dossier, but he has never been to Prague in his life.” 

via RSS http://bit.ly/2VjbBwb Tyler Durden

Bill to End Federally-Funded Kitten Murder Runs Into Opposition From Cat-Killing Bureaucrats

U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley (D–Ore.) has decided to close out the year by introducing the most unobjectionable piece of legislation ever conceived.

Called the Kittens In Traumatic Testing Ends Now Act, or KITTEN Act, Merkley’s bill—introduced last week—aims to stop the Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) current practice of killing off cats they breed for research, requiring instead that these kitties be put up for adoption.

“The KITTEN Act will protect these innocent animals from being needlessly euthanized in government testing, and make sure that they can be adopted by loving families instead,” Merkley said in a statement.

The bill is a response to revelations from the White Coat Waste Project, an anti-animal testing group, about the USDA’s practice of essentially using kittens as parasite incubators at its Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland.

Carlin Becker described the grizzly practice for Reason in September:

“Documents obtained by the [White Coat Waste Project] show the department has been breeding around 100 kittens a year for almost 50 years just to infect them with a parasite that can cause toxoplasmosis, a disease that can lead to miscarriages and birth defects in humans and is a leading cause of death from foodborne illness. The department collects the kittens’ feces for two to three weeks and then simply euthanizes them with a shot of ketamine to the heart.”

This is a pretty shocking practice, considering the undeniable cuteness of the average kitten. It’s made worse by the fact that euthanizing the cats is almost certainly unnecessary.

According to the Center for Disease Control, the toxoplasma found in the research kitties’ poop only poses a risk to humans for up to three weeks after the animal is first infected. The parasite is easily treated in both humans and cats, and most people who become infected with toxoplasma do not even require treatment.

Nevertheless, the USDA has continued to defend the practice, arguing that it’s just following orders best practices in animal research, and that the risks to adoptive families are just too great to let these cats live.

“Our goal is to reduce the spread of toxoplasmosis. Adopting laboratory cats could, unfortunately, undermine that goal, potentially causing severe infections, especially with unborn children or those with immunodeficiencies,” a USDA spokesperson said to CNN back in May.

All things considered, this is a remarkable testament to a bureaucracy’s habit of just continuing to do the same thing it’s always done regardless of how cruel or unnecessary it might be. Indeed, it’s hard to think of anyone that could be opposed to ending needless, government euthanasia of potential fur babies.

No action has been taken on Merkley’s bill, as the text of his legilsation has not been released. A companion House bill—which would prohibit any “painful or stressful” USDA experimentation on cats—was introduced back in May, but has languished in committee for months.

Even in these divided times, one would hope that Americans could at least rally around the cause of saving a few cute kittens from needless, taxpayer-funded annihilation.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2LC8niP
via IFTTT