5 Cops Were ‘Justified’ in Brutal Beating of Unarmed Black Man, Investigators Say

Five Phoenix-area cops won’t be charged for beating an unarmed black man in a May incident that was captured on video. According to an outside police investigation, “the use of force was legally authorized and justified under Arizona State Law.”

On May 23, Mesa Police Department officers responded to a call from a woman who claimed her ex-boyfriend, Erick Reyes, was trying to break into her apartment. When police arrived at her apartment complex, they found Reyes and his friend, 33-year-old Robert Johnson.

Surveillance footage shows Johnson, who lives in the complex, talking on his cellphone before being approached by several officers. The cops searched his pockets (they had heard there could be a weapon on the scene), while Johnson continued his phone call. Then, they motion for him to sit down. In police body camera videos, the officers can be heard repeating this request, CNN reports. While Johnson leaned his back against the wall, he didn’t completely sit down.

At that point, four of the officers (later joined by one of their colleagues) attempted to take him down. They punched him in the face, kneed him, and tackled him to the ground. “Sit your ass down, motherfucker,” one officer can be heard saying during the altercation, according to The Arizona Republic. “See what happens,” one of the officers says.

Surveillance footage of the incident can be seen below:

Why did five cops feel the need to beat an unarmed man? One of the officers claimed Johnson was being confrontational. “Johnson’s body language was projecting he was preparing for a physical altercation,” the officer wrote in his police report.

Johnson was later charged with disorderly conduct and hindering police, but the charges were dropped in mid-June.

Following the incident, Mesa Police Chief Ramon Batista said he was disturbed by this case and another in which officers roughed up a 15-year-old armed robbery suspect after he was already in handcuffs. That incident was also caught on video.

“Let me be crystal clear, I’m angry and I’m deeply disappointed by what I saw in those videos. It’s unacceptable and it needs to stop immediately,” Batista said. “It’s essential when this community interacts with our officers they are treated with the utmost professionalism, no matter the situation. Quite honestly, that’s not what I saw in those videos and that will change.”

The five officers accused of beating Johnson were placed on administrative leave, and Batista asked the Scottsdale Police Department to investigate their conduct. In a statement released yesterday, investigators said they “thoroughly reviewed eight On Body Camera videos which consisted of just over two hours of footage as well as the apartment complex surveillance video.” But they could find no criminal wrongdoing. Scottsdale police shared the results of their investigation with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, who agreed that the incident doesn’t warrant criminal charges.

Benjamin Taylor, an attorney for Johnson, blasted the results of the investigation. “When officers can get away with assaulting citizens, people in our community will lose trust in them and our justice system,” Taylor said in a statement. “The whole world saw the beating Mr. Johnson took at the hands of these Mesa Police Officers.”

Another of Johnson’s lawyers, Joel Robbins, says “the only justice” his client will receive “is from a civil jury.”

The officers involved in the beating, meanwhile, are still on administrative leave.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2LxcFpS
via IFTTT

Ron Paul Warns “Turkey Now, America Later”

Authored by Ron Paul via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity,

President Trump recently imposed sanctions on Turkey to protest the Turkish government’s detention of an American pastor. Turkey has responded by increasing tariffs on US exports. The trade war is being blamed for the collapse of Turkey’s currency, the lira. While the sanctions may have played a role, Turkey’s currency crisis is rooted in the Turkish government’s fiscal and (especially) monetary policies.

In the past seven years, Turkey’s central bank has tripled the money supply and pushed interest rates down to 4.5 percent. While Turkey’s government did not adopt Ben Bernanke’s proposal to drop money from helicopters, Turkish politicians have taken advantage of easy money policies to increase subsidies for key voting blocs and special interests.

The results of the Turkish government’s inflation-fueled spending binge are not surprising to anyone familiar with Austrian economics or economic history. Turkey is now plagued with huge deficits, a collapsing currency, and a looming economic crisis, making it the next candidate for a European Union or Federal Reserve bailout.

Turkey’s combination of low interest rates, money creation, and massive government spending to “stimulate” the economy parallels the policies the US government has pursued for the past ten years. Without drastic changes in fiscal and monetary policies, economic trouble in America is around the corner.

The very large and growing federal debt will cause a major crisis as the government’s debt burden will be unsustainable. Instead of cutting spending or raising taxes, politicians can be expected to pressure the Federal Reserve to do their dirty work for them via inflation. We may even see the Fed “experiment” with negative interest rates, which would punish Americans for saving. The monetization of the federal debt will erode the dollar’s purchasing power and decimate middle-and-working-class Americans who are already seeing any gains in their incomes eaten away by inflation.

If we are lucky, the next Fed-caused downturn will cause only a resurgence of 1970s-style stagflation.

The more likely scenario is the type of widespread economic chaos not seen in America since the Great Depression.

The growth of cultural Marxism, the widespread entitlement mentality, and the willingness of partisans of various sides to use force against their political opponents suggests that this economic crisis will result in civil unrest that will be used to justify new crackdowns on individual liberty.

Those who understand the causes of, and cures for, our current predicament have two responsibilities. First, prepare a plan to protect your family when the crisis occurs. Second, do all you can to spread the truth in hopes the liberty movement reaches critical mass so it can force Congress to make the changes necessary to avert disaster.

Since the crisis will result in a rejection of the dollar’s world reserve currency status, individuals should consider alternatives such as gold and other precious metals. Restoring a free-market monetary system should be a priority for the liberty movement. Other priorities include ending our interventionist foreign policy, cutting spending in all areas, rolling back the surveillance state, protecting all civil liberties, and auditing (and ending) the Federal Reserve. If we do our jobs, we can build a society of peace, prosperity, and liberty atop the ashes of the welfare-warfare state. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wo5jAe Tyler Durden

Defense Distributed Lawyer Josh Blackman on 3D-Printed Guns and Free Speech: Podcast

“There’s been a massive effort by both the federal government and now the state governments to stop Cody from putting information on the internet,” says Josh Blackman, attorney for Defense Distributed founder Cody Wilson, the self-described “anarchist” fighting for the right to post downloadable instructions for 3D-printed guns online.

“The efforts to silence people always fall on those who are outside the mainstream, those pushing the boundaries. And that’s precisely what the First Amendment ought to protect,” says Blackman, who joined Wilson’s legal team in 2015 and also teaches constitutional law at the South Texas College of Law Houston. “The mere fact that this is code doesn’t make it not speech.”

I recently spoke with Blackman about the current state of Wilson’s case and the fundamental constitutional questions it raises. In our wide-ranging conversation, we talked speech, guns, “Lochner-izing the First Amendment,” and why Blackman thinks “the ACLU has been MIA” from the legal fight over 3D-printed guns. “If this case involved banning the posting of blueprints to 3D-print sex toys,” Blackman told me, the ACLU “would be fighting to the teeth. But when it comes to guns, they’re just not there.”

Subscribe, rate, and review our podcast at iTunes. Listen at SoundCloud below:

Audio production by Ian Keyser.

Don’t miss a single Reason Podcast! (Archive here.)

Subscribe at iTunes.

Follow us at SoundCloud.

Subscribe at YouTube.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2wnoSc3
via IFTTT

Is Bitcoin The New Safe Haven Trade?

Bitcoin and the entire crypto space has caught a solid bid this morning, pushing the cryptocurrency back over $7,000 without any apparent catalyst or major news behind the move.

However, according to Andrew Zatlin of Moneyball Economics, one possible explanation is emerging as likely: Bitcoin is becoming the new safe trade.

As Zatlin explains, echoing what we first said in September 2015, emerging markets are continuously using bitcoin (BTC) as a way to get their money of their respective countries.

Crypto currencies are attractive to individuals in less developed economies for a few reasons:

  • Transaction costs are the same as gold.  BTC’s higher price volatility is offset by gold’s higher conversion fees
  • Liquidity favors BTC
  • BTC only requires access to the internet
  • Easier to transport and hide $20,000 of BTC offsets gold’s bulkiness

As recent events in Turkey and Iran show, hard currency and precious metal confiscation is a very real threat.  Crypto is now a very real alternative.

Turkish citizens flocked to bitcoin as the Turkish lira continues to plummet. The lira is down nearly 40% this year alone. An insane drop for a currency.

In dollar terms, gold continues to trade lower as bitcoin catches a bid.

Here’s a chart of bitcoin demand from within Venezuela

The Emerging Markets can be grouped into two categories: those that are adopting BTC and those that are panic buying.  Russia is an example of a late adopter.

Examples of panic buying: Argentina, Chile, Columbia, Hungary, India, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Venezuela.

Here’s Chile:

Here’s Columbia:

Here’s Hungary:

Here’s India:

Here’s Mexico:

Here’s Peru:

And here’s the Philippines:

One signal coming from BTC: indication of underlying economic/capital strength.

It’s still a bit too early to assign a definitive value for regional BTC demand. But the fact that millions of people around the world are flocking to bitcoin is a sure sign there is a value of it.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2MWxcJq Tyler Durden

Buchanan Asks “Are The Interventionists Now Leaderless?”

Authored by Pat Buchanan via Buchanan.org,

“McCain’s Death Leaves Void” ran The Wall Street Journal headline over a front-page story that began:

“The death of John McCain will leave Congress without perhaps its loudest voice in support of the robust internationalism that has defined the country’s security relations since World War II.”

Certainly, the passing of the senator whose life story will dominate the news until he is buried at his alma mater, the Naval Academy, on Sunday, leaves America’s interventionists without their greatest champion.

No one around has the prestige or media following of McCain.

And the cause he championed, compulsive intervention in foreign quarrels to face down dictators and bring democrats to power, appears to be a cause whose time has passed.

When 9/11 occurred, America was united in crushing the al-Qaida terrorists who perpetrated the atrocities. John McCain then backed President Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003, which had no role in the attacks.

During Barack Obama’s presidency, he slipped into northern Syria to cheer rebels who had arisen to overthrow President Bashar Assad, an insurgency that led to a seven-year civil war and one of the great humanitarian disasters of our time.

McCain supported the expansion of NATO into Eastern Europe and the Baltic, right up to Russia’s border.

When Georgia invaded South Ossetia in 2008, and was expelled by the Russian army, McCain roared, “We are all Georgians now!”

He urged intervention. But Bush, his approval rating scraping bottom, had had enough of the neocon crusades for democracy.

McCain’s contempt for Vladimir Putin was unconstrained. When crowds gathered in Maidan Square in Kiev to overthrow an elected pro-Russian president, McCain was there, cheering them on.

He supported sending arms to the Ukrainian army to fight pro-Russian rebels in the Donbass. He backed U.S. support for Saudi intervention in Yemen. And this war, too, proved to be a humanitarian disaster.

John McCain was a war hawk, and proud of it. But by 2006, the wars he had championed had cost the Republican Party both houses of Congress.

In 2008, when he was on the ballot, those wars helped cost him the presidency.

By 2016, the Republican majority would turn its back on McCain and his protege, Sen. Lindsey Graham, and nominate Donald Trump, who said he would seek to get along with Russia and extricate America from the wars into which McCain had helped plunge the country.

Yet, while interventionism now has no great champion and has proven unable to rally an American majority, it retains a residual momentum. This compulsion is pushing us to continue backing the Saudi war in Yemen and to seek regime change in Iran.

Yet if either of these enterprises holds any prospect of bringing about a more peaceful and prosperous Middle East, no one has made the case.

While the foreign policy that won the Cold War, containment, was articulated by George Kennan and pursued by presidents from Truman to Bush I, no grand strategy for the post-Cold War era has ever been embraced by a majority of Americans.

Bush I’s “New World Order” was rejected by Ross Perot’s economic patriots and Bill Clinton’s baby boomers who wanted to spend America’s peace dividend from our Cold War victory on America’s homefront.

As for the Bush II crusades for democracy “to end tyranny in our world,” the fruits of that Wilsonian idealism turned into ashes in our mouths.

But if the foreign policy agendas of Bush I and Bush II, along with McCain’s interventionism, have been tried and found wanting, what is America’s grand strategy?

What are the great goals of U.S. foreign policy? What are the vital interests for which all, or almost all Americans, believe we should fight?

“Take away this pudding; it has no theme,” said Churchill. Britain has lost an empire, but not yet found a role, was the crushing comment of Dean Acheson in 1962.

Both statements appear to apply to U.S. foreign policy in 2018.

We are bombing and fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen, partly John McCain’s legacy. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has sent a virtual ultimatum to Iran. We have told North Korea, a nuclear power with the world’s fourth-largest army, either to denuclearize or the U.S. may use its military might to get the job done.

We are challenging Beijing in its claimed territorial waters of the South China Sea. From South Korea to Estonia, we are committed by solemn treaty to go to war if any one of dozens of nations is attacked.

Now one hears talk of an “Arab NATO” to confront the ayatollah’s Iran and its Shiite allies. Lest we forget, ISIS and al-Qaida are Sunni.

With all these war guarantees, the odds are excellent that one day we are going to be dragged in yet another war that the American people will sour upon soon after it begins.

Where is the American Kennan of the new century?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2PgxDMb Tyler Durden

Georgia Tech Rejects a Qualified Job Applicant Over His Teenage Criminal Record

|||Screenshot via YouTube/Love Grace & MercyBenjamin Paul was excited to begin a career adviser position at Georgia Tech on August 1. Now he finds himself without a job because of the crimes he committed nearly 20 years ago as a teenager. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) shared Paul’s story.

Paul said that his criminal record “looks real messy on paper.” When he was 17 and 18 years old and living in his native Tampa, Florida, Paul sold cocaine and “tried to shake down some junkies for cash.” His actions earned him convictions for selling cocaine, possessing a firearm as a delinquent, and two unarmed robberies. He served time for less than a year. After getting out, he moved to Miami for a better life. Since that time, Paul earned his GED, several degrees (associate’s, bachelor’s, and master’s), became an ordained minister, and worked as a career adviser at Miami Dade College for four years. Paul is now 30 years of age and has a daughter in the third grade.

Paul received an offer from Georgia Tech for a position that would have paid him $50,000 a year. To prepare, Paul rented an apartment in a neighborhood that was close to his job and would allow his daughter a chance to attend a “winning school.” He received positive references from his superiors at Miami Dade College, like then-college supervisor Nathaniel Gomez. Paul informed the staff of his criminal background. Despite some hesitation in the beginning, his performance was so valued that Gomez told ACJ Paul “had made a name as a positive, dedicated, professional employee.” Despite his degrees and “stellar” references, Georgia Tech’s HR office informed him earlier in the month that a background check disqualified him for the position.

Hall County Judge Jason Deal, son of Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal and an advocate for drug courts, told the AJC that stories like Paul’s were common. “They get a job and are working the job well, and after 30 days they do a background check and they lose the job. The company says, ‘Well, that’s the policy,'” he said. Judge Steven Teske, chief judge of the Clayton County juvenile court, criticized the ordeal, saying “This guy for the last 12 years has lived an ideal life, but his name continues to be on a list that serves no purpose for society.”

Though Miami Dade College gave Paul a chance, his rejection from Georgia Tech is not a first. While on probation, Paul was tasked with getting a job. He was similarly rejected from entry-level positions at places like Kroger, Target, and UPS after they performed a background check.

Bonus link: Licensing laws have stifled the career development of ex-offenders.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2MYyCTz
via IFTTT

These Students Know More Than Politicians: New at Reason

“Gouging” becomes an issue every hurricane season. After big storms, some people raise prices. Then politicians and the media freak out. Both demand tougher laws against “gouging.”

But Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman says, “the gougers deserve a medal” because they take risks to bring in goods that people desperately need.

Annelise Kofod, Erika Lewis, and Maggie Hroncich are students who get that.

Click here for full text and downloadable versions.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Like us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

The views expressed in this video are solely those of John Stossel; his independent production company, Stossel Productions; and the people he interviews. The claims and opinions set forth in the video and accompanying text are not necessarily those of Reason.

View this article.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2NrnjjN
via IFTTT

Google Responds To Trump, Says “Doesn’t Bias Search Results”

Following an accusation by president Trump that Google was “rigging” search results against him, providing as evidence a “Trump News” search which showed predominantly “left” media publications popping up in the search results…

… Google has responded.

As a reminder, first thing this morning, Trump tweeted that “Google search results for ‘Trump News’ shows only the viewing/reporting of Fake New Media. In other words, they have it RIGGED, for me & others, so that almost all stories & news is BAD, Fake CNN is prominent. Republican/Conservative & Fair Media is shut out. Illegal,” Trump said in his latest claim of bias by the media. 96% of results on “Trump News” are from National Left-Wing Media, very dangerous.”

Following Trump’s tweet, his chief economic advisor Larry Kudlow told reporters outside of the White House this morning that the administration is “taking a look” at whether Google searches should be subject to government regulation.

Google has now responded, claiming that the company doesn’t “bias” its results toward any political ideology and that “search is not used to set a political agenda.” Google also hedged by saying that it periodically issues “hundreds of improvements to our algorithms” to ensure they surface “high-quality content in response to users’ queries.” It was unclear if Google considers only liberal websites as “high quality content.”

Google’s full response is below:

“Search is not used to set a political agenda and we don’t bias our results toward any political ideology”

“Every year, we issue hundreds of improvements to our algorithms to ensure they surface high-quality content in response to users’ queries. We continually work to improve Google Search and we never rank search results to manipulate political sentiment”

However, one can’t help but be skeptical considering that just before the 2016 presidential election, among the many leaks published by Wikileaks as part of its Podesta email campaign was Google’s “strategic plan” to help democrats win the election and track voters.

It is unlikely that Trump will be satisfied with Google’s sincere response.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Pe7Xjb Tyler Durden

The $1.7 Billion Federal Job Training Program Is a Massive Failure

The Department of Labor’s Job Corps program is supposed to teach disadvantaged young people the skills they need to get good jobs. But the program, which costs taxpayers about $1.7 billion per year, is apparently a failure.

About 50,000 students enroll in the program each year, about two-thirds of whom are high school dropouts, according to The New York Times. Results aside, the program’s goals are admirable. As The Wall Street Journal reported in April:

Launched in 1964, Job Corps works with 16- to 24-year-olds who grew up homeless or poor, passed through foster care, or suffered other hardships. The goal is to equip these young adults with skills for careers in advanced manufacturing, the building trades, health care, information technology, business and more.

Unfortunately, that’s not what’s happening. A March audit from the Labor Department’s Office of Inspector General sampled 324 Job Corps participants who were five years removed from graduation. The median annual income of 231 of those participants (wage records weren’t available for the rest), was just $12,486 as of December 2016. The audit acknowledged that “Job Corps could not demonstrate beneficial job training outcomes.”

That’s not all. Job Corps spends about $50 million a year on “transition services” to help graduates find jobs. But in 94 percent of the cases sampled, “Job Corps contractors could not demonstrate they had assisted participants in finding jobs.”

The program’s failure is perhaps best seen at the North Texas Job Corps Center, which is a roughly 40-minute drive from Dallas. While the Dallas economy is booming, this center is one of the poorest-performing Job Corps campuses in the nation. Violence is an issue, particularly gang-related incidents. It doesn’t help that students at this center—and at all Job Corps campuses around the country—have to live together.

One former North Texas teacher, who quit in 2015, says the entire program is failing. “Job Corps doesn’t work,” the teacher, Teresa Sanders, tells the Times. “The adults are making money, the politicians are getting photo ops. But we are all failing the students.”

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta admits the program “requires fundamental reform.”

“It is not enough to make changes at the margins,” he tells the Times. “We need large-scale changes.”

Despite its shortcomings, Jobs Corps is popular among both Republicans and Democrats in Congress (to Democrats, it’s a government program aimed at reducing poverty; to Republicans, it incentivizes hard work), so there’s only so much Acosta can do. “You have a program with a rich and complicated history that’s one of the biggest leftovers from the war on poverty, and it is enormously complicated to make any significant changes,” Eric M. Seleznow, a former deputy assistant secretary for the Labor Department’s Employment and Training Administration during the Obama administration, tells the Times. He notes that “competing interests from Congress, program operators, advocates, as well as complex legal requirements present a lot of challenges.”

If Job Corps is salvageable, then it can do some real good. But if real reforms aren’t going to happen, Congress should shut it down.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2LBQJKe
via IFTTT

Rand Spikes As South Africa Withdraws Land Confiscation Bill

One week after Trump warned South Africa about its controversial land confiscation reform in which some white-owned land could be expropriated without compensation, moments ago Bloomberg reported that South Africa has withdrawn its land expropriation bill in what appears to be another victory for Trump’s unorthodox foreign policy.

Last Wednesday, seemingly following a story by Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, President Trump tweeted that he has asked Secretary of State Mike Pompeo “to closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations” raising concerns that the U.S. might target South Africa with possible sanctions next.

Trump wasn’t the only one to voice concern, and recent the South African rand had tumbled amid fears how this policy could affect the economy.

Well, if the following Bloomberg headline is accurate, it will no longer be a concern:

  • *S. AFRICA EXPRORIATION BILL WITHDRAWN AMID CONSTITUTION REVIEW

While the market’s kneejerk response has been positive, with the rand jumping on the news…

… there has been virtually no detail and this could be merely a trial balloon headfake. As some have noted, the withdrawal of the bill now would be not only surprising, but premature, as the parliamentary committee tasked with land reform on Section 25 of the constitution is not expected to decide until September 27.

Furthermore, recall that as we reported yesterday, South Africa’s “Black Hitler”, Julius Malema said that he is prepared to die if it means South Africa will achieve land expropriation without compensation.

Additionally, Malema has accused President Ramaphosa and the Democratic Alliance (DA) of colluding with AfriForum to sabotage plans to expropriate land without compensation. A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.

Developing story.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2MVnHdw Tyler Durden