Iran Nuclear Deal – Alive Or Dead?

Submitted by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org,

Though every Republican in Congress voted against the Iran nuclear deal, “Tearing it up … is not going to happen,” says Sen. Bob Corker, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

Hopefully, the chairman speaks for the president-elect.

During the campaign, Donald Trump indicated as much, saying that, though the U.S. got jobbed in the negotiations — “We have a horrible contract, but we do have a contract” — he might not walk away.

To Trump, a deal’s a deal, even a bad one. And we did get taken.

In 2007 and 2011, all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies assured us, “with high confidence,” that Iran did not have an atomic bomb program.

Yet our folks forked over $50 billion for an Iranian show and tell to prove they were not doing what our 17 intelligence agencies told us, again and again, they were not doing.

Why did we disbelieve our own intelligence, and buy into the “Chicken Little” chatter about Iran being “only months away from a bomb”?

Corker also administered a cold shower to those who darkly warn of a secret Iranian program to produce a bomb: “In spite of all the flaws in the agreement, nothing bad is going to happen relative to nuclear development in Iran in the next few years. It’s just not.”

Under the deal, Iran has put two-thirds of the 19,000 centrifuges at Natanz in storage, ceased enriching uranium to 20 percent at Fordow, poured concrete into the core of its heavy water reactor at Arak, and shipped 97 percent of its enriched uranium out of the country. Cameras and United Nations inspectors are all over the place.

Even should Iran decide on a crash program to create enough fissile material for a single A-bomb test, this would take a year, and we would know about it.

But why would they? After all, there are sound reasons of state why Iran decided over a decade ago to forego nuclear weapons.

Discovery of a bomb program could bring the same U.S. shock and awe as was visited on Iraq for its nonexistent WMD. Discovery would risk a pre-emptive strike by an Israel with scores of nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia and Turkey would have a powerful inducement to build their own bombs.

Acquiring a nuclear weapon would almost surely make Iran, a Persian nation on the edge of a sea of Arabs, less secure.

If, however, in the absence of a violation of the treaty by Iran, we tore up the deal, we could find ourselves isolated. For Britain, France and Germany also signed, and they believe the agreement is a good one.

Do we really want to force these NATO allies to choose between the deal they agreed to and a break with the United States?

If the War Party is confident Iran is going to cheat, why not wait until they do. Then make our case with evidence, so our allies can go with us on principle, and not from pressure.

Also at issue is the deal signed by Boeing to sell Iran 80 jetliners. Airbus has contracted to sell Iran 100 planes, and begun delivery. List price for the two deals: $34.5 billion. Tens of thousands of U.S. jobs are at stake.

Is a Republican Congress prepared to blow up the Boeing deal and force the Europeans to cancel the Airbus deal?

Why? Some contend the planes can be used to transport the Iranian Republican Guard. But are the Iranians, who are looking to tourism, trade and investment to rescue their economy, so stupid as to spend $35 billion for troop transports they could buy from Vladimir Putin?

The Ayatollah’s regime may define itself by its hatred of the Great Satan. Still, in 2009, even our War Party was urging President Obama to publicly back the Green Movement uprising against the disputed victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

In 2013, moderates voted Hassan Rouhani into the presidency, where he began secret negotiations with the USA.

New elections will be held this year. And while the death of ex-President Rafsanjani this weekend has removed the powerful patron of Rouhani and strengthened the hard-liners, Ayatollah Khamenei is suffering from cancer, and the nation’s future remains undetermined.

Iran’s young seek to engage with the West. But if they are spurned, by the cancellation of the Boeing deal and the reimposition of U.S. sanctions, they will be disillusioned and discredited, and the mullahs will own the future.

How would that serve U.S. interests?

We still have sanctions on Iran for its missile tests in violation of Security Council resolutions, for its human rights violations, and for its support of groups like Hezbollah. But we also have in common with Iran an enmity for the Sunni terrorists of al-Qaida and ISIS.

We are today fighting in Libya, Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, as the War Party works to confront Beijing in the South China Sea, Russia in Ukraine and North Korea over its nuclear and missile tests.

Could we perhaps put the confrontation with Iran on hold?

via http://ift.tt/2j2HHLW Tyler Durden

Three “Cartel” FX Traders Criminally Charged With Currency Rigging

Moments ago, U.S. prosecutors charged three traders who made up the infamous “Cartel” currency rigging chat room, and who were at the heart of a criminal investigation that has ensnared the world’s biggest banks over the rigging of currency rates. Richard Usher, formerly head of G10 spot trading at JPMorgan, Rohan Ramchandani, formerly of Citigroup and Chris Ashton, formerly of Barclays, were indicted Tuesday for conspiring to fix prices. They’re all outside the U.S. and will have to be extradited unless they surrender voluntarily.


Richard Usher

As first reported back in 2013 when the FX rigging scandal broke out, the three used an online chatroom they dubbed ‘The Cartel’ to coordinate the rigging of foreign-exchange benchmarks by sharing confidential customer information, according to the U.S. charge. Another member, Matt Gardiner, formerly of UBS Group AG, has been helping prosecutors build cases against the traders, Bloomberg reported earlier.

Citigroup, Barclays, JPMorgan and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc pleaded guilty in May 2015 to conspiring to rig currency rates. UBS Group AG received immunity from prosecution, but its conduct breached an earlier agreement over its role in manipulating benchmark interest rates.

The Cartel chatroom ran from at least December 2007 until January 2013, prosecutors have said in court papers. It was limited to specific euro/dollar traders, they said. Many conversations took place just before daily fixes, the brief windows of time when data providers take a snapshot of trading so they can set daily rates.

As Bloomberg noted previously, the charges make good on the government’s long-running promise it would hold individuals to account in the case. As far back as September 2014, then-Attorney General Eric Holder said charges against traders were imminent.

Those efforts were hampered by issues of evidence and lack of cooperators, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg last year. Bloomberg published a series of articles in 2013 exposing how the world’s biggest banks were colluding to rig foreign exchange rates.

 

Some prosecutions are moving forward. Over the past six months, two currency traders were charged and a third pleaded guilty to rigging allegations. This summer, Gardiner and Ashton were banned from the U.S. banking industry for life by the Federal Reserve, which also imposed a $1.2 million fine on Ashton.

Unlike the US, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office dropped its investigation into currency rigging last year citing insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction. The agency interviewed 19 individuals as part of its probe, according to a freedom-of-information request by Bloomberg in August, including four under caution. Interviews under caution generally mean the person is being treated as a suspect.

Some more details from Bloomberg for those unfamiliar with the story:

Citigroup, Barclays, JPMorgan and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc pleaded guilty in the U.S. in May 2015 to conspiring to rig currency rates. UBS received immunity from prosecution in the currency case, but its conduct breached an earlier agreement over its role in manipulating benchmark interest rates.

 

During the banks’ Jan. 5 sentencing, a federal judge in Connecticut urged the Justice Department to pursue individuals in the cases.

 

“Mischief will be best deterred if the people responsible are not only fired but that any compensation made to them that was triggered by the wrongful conduct, for example bonuses, are clawed back or disgorged,” U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill said. “Frankly I would encourage the government to consider prosecution of individuals.”

via http://ift.tt/2idgVMK Tyler Durden

Oil Holds Losses After Inventory Data Shows More Builds

Having tumbled to a $50 handle during the day session, WTI Crude whipsawed to unchanged after API reported 1.53mm crude build (in line with expectations), a Cushing draw, and builds again (after last week's massive builds) for gasoline and distillates.

 

API

  • Crude +1.53mm (+1.5mm exp)
  • Cushing -187k
  • Gasoline +1.69mm
  • Distillates +5.48mm

After a big crude draw and massive product inventory builds last week, it appears things have calmed down a little…

 

The reaction was a quick jump higher and fade back to unch…

 

And finally we note that:

  • *GUNDLACH EXPECTS OIL TO VACILITE IN $45-$55 RANGE IN 2017

via http://ift.tt/2j52Fde Tyler Durden

“Permanently High Plateaus”, “This Time Is Different”, & Other Common Trading Mistakes

Submitted by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

As we enter into the first full week of trading since Christmas, the Dow Jones has been unable to attain the magical 20,000 level. While I still suspect this will eventually occur, the challenge has been more difficult that I expected.

I noted in last weekend’s newsletter, “The Problem With Forecasts,” the Dow is currently working on completing an advance of 5000 points over a 24-month span. The last time such a compressed advance occurred was during the 1998-1999 period.

But what about the S&P 500?

Following the 1994 market lull, the S&P 500 began its first serious bull market advance as a wave of investors flooded into the market due to the introduction of online trading and the official opening of the “Wall Street Casino.” From 1995 to its peak in March of 2000 the market advance (whole number basis only) by 1000 points over that 60-month period. 

Of course, the subsequent correction of the “dot.com” mania reset the market by roughly 50% of that previous advance.

Following the crash, investors reluctantly began to return to the markets in mid-2003. As the Federal Reserve, and deregulation of Wall Street advanced, so did investors speculation in the markets as a real estate sub-prime lending took hold. Beginning in 2003, the market began a 60-month trek higher of 700-points before once again finding the limits of “fantasy and reality.”

So, here we are once again. Over the last 60-months the markets have advanced by 1100-points, and 1400-points over the last 84 months, as Fed-induced monetary stimulus and suppression of interest rates have once again led investors to believe “this time is different.” 

Throughout history, as shown in the chart below, prices have ALWAYS, and I repeat ALWAYS, eventually found their limits. There has never been a “permanently high plateau” that inoculated investors from devastating consequences of misconceived and poorly managed investments.

Importantly, as you will note above, whenever prices have had extreme deviations from the underlying long-term growth trend, as we have currently, the resolution of those excesses were never accomplished by just a “reversion TO the mean.” 

With the markets, and the economy, currently pushing the historical limits of time and distance, the reality of an unexpected mean-reverting event has risen in recent months. While such a statement does not imply that a correction will occur immediately, or even within the next few months,

Since I covered “Curing The Trading Addiction” yesterday, which were more general concepts of money management, I wanted to follow up with the specific actions we take which lead us to poor outcomes over time.

Common Trading Mistakes

Many of these are related and are part and parcel of the same refusal to pay proper attention to risk management. If you recognize your own actions in some of these, join the club. Over the years, I’ve committed every sin on the list at least once. Still do on occasion.

1) Refusing To Take A Loss – Until The Loss Takes You.

When you buy a stock it should be with the expectation that it will go up – otherwise, why would you buy it?. If it goes down instead, you’ve made a mistake in your analysis. Either you’re early, or just plain wrong. It amounts to the same thing.

“There is no shame in being wrong, only in STAYING wrong.”

This goes to the heart of the familiar adage: “let winners run, cut losers short.” Nothing will eat into your performance more than carrying a bunch of dogs and their attendant fleas, both in terms of actual losses and in terms of dead, or underperforming, money.

2) The Unrealized Loss

From whence came the idiotic notion that a loss “on paper” isn’t a “real” loss until you actually sell the stock? Or that a profit isn’t a profit until the stock is sold and the money is in the bank? Nonsense!

“Your portfolio is worth whatever you can sell it for, at the market, right at this moment. No more. No less.”

People are reluctant to sell a loser for a variety of reasons. For some it’s an ego/pride thing, an inability to admit they’ve made a mistake. That is false pride, and it’s faulty thinking. Your refusal to acknowledge a loss doesn’t make it any less real. Hoping, and waiting, for a loser to come back and save your fragile pride is just plain stupid.

Losses are a cost of doing business, a part of the game. If you never have losses, then you are not trading properly. Most pros have three losers for every winner. They make money by keeping the losses small and letting the profits build. You should be almost happy to take a loss. It means that you have jettisoned an underachiever stock and have freed up that dead money to put to better use elsewhere. Take your losses ruthlessly, put them out of mind and don’t look back, and turn your attention to your next trade.

3) If I Bet Big – I Win Big

You also lose big.

Preservation Of Capital Is Paramount. If you run out of chips, the game is over. Most professionals will allocate no more than 2-5% of their total investment capital to any one position.

Even when your analysis is overwhelmingly bullish, it never hurts to have some cash on hand, even if it earns ZERO in money markets. This gives you liquid cash to buy opportunities, but also keeps you from having to liquidate a position at an inopportune time to raise cash for the “Murphy Emergency” (the emergency that always occurs when you have the least amount of cash available – Murphy’s Law #73)

As the market becomes more overbought, overextended, and overvalued, your cash level should rise accordingly. Then as the market gets more oversold and undervalued, you have cash to raise your market exposure. Or rather, “sell high so you can buy low.”

4) Bottom Feeding Knife Catchers

Don’t ANTICIPATE bottoms. It’s almost always better to let the stock find its bottom on its own, and then start to nibble. Just because a stock is down, doesn’t mean it can’t go down even more. Let stocks and markets bottom and top on their own and limit your efforts to recognizing the fact “soon enough.”

“Nobody, and I mean nobody, can consistently nail the bottom tick or top tick. Anyone who says they do, is probably lying.”

5) Dollar Cost Averaging

Don’t do it. For one thing, you shouldn’t even have the opportunity, because you should have sold that dog before it got to the level where averaging down is tempting. The pros average UP, not down. They got to be pros because they added to winners, not losers.

Only advisors without a real investment discipline or strategy, or those just collecting fees for assets under management, promote dollar cost averaging.

6) You Can’t Fight City Hall OR The Trend

The vast majority of stocks, roughly 80%, will go with the market flow. And so should you.

It doesn’t make sense to counter trade the prevailing market trend. Don’t short stocks in strong uptrends and don’t buy stocks in strong downtrends. Remember, real investors don’t speculate – “The Trend Is Your Friend”

If you’re worried about a short-term pullback, simply cut back on your trading, take a few profits, and build up your stash of cash until the squall has passed. There is “NO RULE” that says you have to be invested “all the time.” 

7) A Good Company Is Not Necessarily A Good Stock

This is, at heart, a problem with fundamental analysis which will identify great companies but doesn’t take into account market, and investor, sentiment. Combining fundamental analysis, which tells you “what” to buy, with technical analysis, to determine “when” to buy, will help you own a great company which is also a great stock. 

8) Chasing Performance

Yes, you can make a quick buck chasing momentum, but you can lose it even quicker. You can never be sure there’s a greater fool coming in after you, and that could make you the “greatest fool” of all.

9) Technically Trapped

Amateur technicians regularly fall into periods where they tend to favor one or two indicators over all others. No harm in that, so long as the favored indicators keep on working.

However, market conditions change which also means the efficacy of your indicators will change. Indicators which work in one type of market, may lead you badly astray in another. You have to be aware of what’s working now and what’s not, and be ready to shift when conditions shift.

There is no Holy Grail indicator that works all the time and in all markets. If you think you’ve found it, get ready to lose money. Instead, take your trading signals from the “accumulation of evidence” among ALL of your indicators, not just one.

10) The Tale Of The Tape

I get a kick out of people who insist that they’re intermediate or long-term investors, buy a stock, then anxiously ask whether they should bail the first time the stocks drops a point or two. More likely than not, the panic was induced by watching the tape, or hearing some talking head on CNBC.

Watching the ticker can be dangerous. It leads to emotional and often hasty decisions. Try not to make trading decisions when the market is in session. Do your analysis and make your plan when the market is closed, then calmly execute your plan the following day.

11 ) Worried About Taxes

Don’t let tax considerations dictate your decision on whether to sell a stock. Pay capital gains tax willingly, even joyfully. The only way to avoid paying taxes on a stock trade is to not make any money on the trade.

“If you are paying taxes – you are making money…it’s better than the alternative”

12) Leave The Guru’s In India

They are everywhere – television, print, radio (including me) and everyone has an opinion. You should not be letting some self-appointed market expert dictate or dominate your trading decisions. 

“The media is there to sell advertising not make you money – it is for entertainment.”

The most you should expect, or accept, from folks like me, are market analysis, some tidbits of trading strategies, and a bit of guidance in maintaining a solid trading discipline.

13) Everybody’s A Genius

Don’t confuse genius with a bull market. It’s not that hard to make money in a roaring bull market. Keeping your gains when the bear comes prowling is the hard part.

“The market whips all of our butts now and then, and that whipping usually comes just when we think we’ve got it all figured out.”

Managing risk is the key to survival in the market and ultimately in making money. Leave the pontificating to CNBC. Focus on managing risk, market cycles and exposure.

In the long-run, you will likely be better off.

via http://ift.tt/2jACqfl Tyler Durden

FBI: Violent Crime Up, Property Crime Down

The FBI has just put out its preliminary report on crime in the first half of 2016. The news is mostly bad, with violent crime increasing 5.3 percent since the previous year. Since the FBI’s stats also showed violent crime going up in 2015, there’s a good chance we’re on track for two consecutive years of rises. (The full report on 2016’s crime rates won’t come out until the fall.)

Specifically, the report shows murders up 5.2 percent, aggravated assaults up 6.5 percent, violent robberies up 3.2 percent, and rape rising either 3.2 or 3.5 percent, depending on how you define the crime. (The FBI revised its definition of rape in 2013, but it continues to offer statistics for both the old definition and the new one.) Property crime, on the other hand, showed a very slight decline, though one particular property offense—auto thefts—became more common. All this is roughly similar to the trendlines from 2015, which also saw an overall increase in violent crime, an overall decrease in property crime, and an auto-theft exception to the property-crime decline.

Since this year and a half of increases follows a two-decade drop in crime rates, these levels remain low by historical standards. (That’s not true of some specific places, such as Chicago and Baltimore, that are undergoing undeniable crime crises. But these numbers offer a nationwide perspective.) The unanswered question is what these rises represent. Is this a new trend that threatens to undo the gains of the ’90s and ’00s? Is it a temporary shift, comparable to the brief hike we saw in the mid-’00s before the rates resumed their fall? Or is it something else?

John Pfaff, a Fordham law professor and the author of the forthcoming Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration and How to Achieve Real Reform, offers a third hypothesis. “Sometimes a rise in crime is causal—the rise in murders that started in 1985 was due to crack-market related violence,” he says. “But any rise (or fall) in crime is also partly just noise. So it’s perfectly plausible to look at, say, murder rates and say that the mean was about 9 per 100,000 during the high-crime era, with a lot of ‘noisiness’ around that. The same story may be true now: Perhaps with hindsight we’ll realize that the mean murder rate is now going to be around 6, with some good or bad years on either side of that. What some are viewing as a ‘rise in crime’ could instead just be more a regression to the mean, and to a mean that is still much lower than it was 20 years ago.”

Just to muddy matters more, the other major measurement of crime in America—the National Crime Victimization Survey—actually showed nonfatal violent crime going down in 2015. (We do not yet have their 2016 results.) The FBI’s count and the NCVS count each have their strengths and weaknesses, so that isn’t a rival narrative so much as it’s a sign that there are limits on our ability to perceive the “real” crime rate. There are two major measurements of crime in America, and at the moment they diverge. (For more on the differences between the NCVS numbers and the FBI’s numbers, go here.)

Murder, in any event, does seem to be on track to go up for two years running. The NCVS doesn’t cover homicides (by definition, murder victims can’t be surveyed), and the FBI numbers probably aren’t far off (as the saying goes, bodies are hard to hide). While we don’t have the FBI’s numbers for the second half of 2016 yet, many jurisdictions do have preliminary counts for the full year. Over at FiveThirtyEight, Jeff Asher has gathered data from most of the country’s big cities, and he’s projecting that we’ll ultimately see a national rate of about 5.3 murders for every 100,000 people in 2016—slightly less than in 2008:

So the numbers are still far lower than in most of the last half-century, but that line isn’t pointing in the direction we want. Pfaff, who worries about the costs of overreacting to crime as well as the costs of crime itself, offers this takeaway: “Don’t be complacent, but don’t panic.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2j5hxZj
via IFTTT

Obama’s Farewell Address Tonight, Trump Hires Vaccine Skeptic to Lead Commission on Vaccine Safety: P.M. Links

  • ByePresident Obama will give his farewell address tonight at 9:00 p.m. Check my Twitter feed for commentary.
  • Vaccine skeptic Robert Kennedy, Jr., who promotes the false idea that vaccines cause autism, will have a role in the Trump administration: chairing a new committee on vaccine safety.
  • The New Republic did not like Jonathan Chait’s new book about Obama’s successes.
  • Study: conservatives are better looking.
  • Title IX launch hashtag campaign asking Betsy DeVos not to rein in the Office for Civil Rights.
  • Sen. Jeff Sessions says that if you don’t want him to go after marijuana users, you need to change federal law.
  • Draining the swamp.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2idmUBi
via IFTTT

Jeff Gundlach’s “Drain The Swamp” Presentation

One month after his webcast titled optimistically “Drain the Swamp“, which was a forward look at the impact of the upcoming Trump administration (which one can debate if it “drained” the swamp, or alternatively added to it), today at 4:15pm ET (1:15pm PT), bond king Jeff Gundlach kicks off the new year by holding his first for 2017 monthly DoubeLine webcast, titled “Just markets.”

Having kept a relatively low profile in the past month, in Gundlach last media appearance, the bond king, after turning more bearish on risk assets in late 2016, told Reuters on December 13  the 10-year Treasury note yield above 3% will harm the stock-market rally and housing market: “I think above 3 percent is a problem,” Gundlach told Reuters. “If the 10-year goes above 3 percent, you would also have to say unequivocally you have seen the end of the bond bull market.”

During his last webcast, Gundlach also reiterated that Donald Trump’s administration will be “bond unfriendly” and investors should brace for a 6 percent 10-year Treasury yield within four to five years.

Gundlach said it is reasonable to be nimble and do some purchasing of Treasuries. “I think it is an okay buy right now,” he said. “We hate the market less. We are a little bit less defensive,” Gundlach said. Since then the 10Y has traded rangebound. Earlier today, Bill Gross noted that a breakout of the 10Y yield above 2.60% would end the 30 year bull market rally, and would have substantial adverse consequences for all risk assets.  On the topic, Gundlach referenced a different level, and said if the 10-year yield exceeds 3 percent next year, high-yield “junk” bonds will drop into a “black hole of illiquidity.”

In early December he said that “it is so late to be buying the Trump Trade.” That, has so far proven inaccurate with the Dow Jones soaring over 500 points since his statement, and continuing to knock on 20,000s door.

Readers can log into Gundlach’s latest live at the following link.

via http://ift.tt/2jrPlfx Tyler Durden

Watch Tampa Police Arrest Activists for Feeding the Homeless Without a Permit

Tampa police officers arrested seven Food Not Bombs members on Saturday for the vile crime of providing hot meals to the homeless without a permit.

According to the Tampa Bay Times, Tampa police had earlier warned the local chapter of Food Not Bombs that they needed a facility use permit to set up in a public park. The local activists say the paperwork for such a permit is ridiculous and requires liability insurance coverage of $1 million. Just to feed the homeless. They refused to comply, and while they were serving up some tasty quinoa and mushrooms, police began arresting them.

Watch video of the arrests:

“We warned them: You set up table, chairs and everything, that’s against ordinance,” a police spokesman told the Tampa Bay Times. “We told them exactly what would happen. And that’s exactly what happened.”

The seven activists were ticketed and released. In a statement to local media, the Food Not Bombs chapter said they have no intention of shutting down.

“[Food Not Bombs] has no plans to stop sharing food with the homeless and hungry and will continue to defy unjust laws that criminalize compassion and mutual aid,” the group said. “We intend to expose the city’s cruelty in the face of thousands in our community who are struggling with issues of food insecurity, mental and medical health issues, poverty, and homelessness.”

The local outlet SaintPetersBlog reports the city has a history of shutting down rogue Samaritans:

This isn’t the first time that the police have cracked down on public feedings of the homeless in the Bob Buckhorn administration. Months into his first term in 2011, police stopped a group who had been feeding the homeless for six years. Buckhorn’s predecessor, Pam Iorio, had her own run-ins with Food Not Bombs back in 2004, when the group fed the homeless at Herman Massey Park.

Reason has been on the outlaw food beat for years now. Read more about San Antonio, Dallas, and Ft. Lauderdale cracking down on providing food to the homeless.

And watch ReasonTV’s 2012 video about how Philadelphia passed a law outlawing the feeding of the homeless:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2jfx85A
via IFTTT

Bullion, Biotechs, & Banks Bid As Bonds & Black Gold Skid

Following this morning's manic euphoria in small businesses and ahead of tonight's delusion by Obama, given the market's performance, this seemed appropriate…

But, it appears the hype of the reflation/growth trade is now well and truly over…

 

Financial conditions don't seem to matter…

 

For now it's all about 2018 or 2019 or 2020…?

 

Because trailing earnings are 'disappointing' to say the least…

 

And 2017 Earnings still haven't been notched up by the analysts…

*  *  *

Having got all that off our chests… Nasdaq another record high as The Dow tried but failed again for 20k, clinging to unch as Small Caps and Trannies squeezed higher again…NOTE – once again we rallied into the European close and sold off… and once again a weak close

 

Nasdaq longest streak of gains to start a year since 2006.

 

Financials and Healthcare outperformed…

 

As Biotech stocks continue their charge higher, up 6 days in a row (longest win streak since July 2015) – best start to a year since 2000 (which was followed by complete carnage)…

 

Banks continue to tred water for the last few weeks ahead of this week's chaos of earnings on Friday…

 

WMT stumbled into the red after announcing more layoffs…

 

VIX ended unchanged aftr the initial slam to send stocks higher…

 

The Dollar Index limped higher…

 

As Yuan weakened all day (back above 6.91/$)…

 

Treasury yields also limped higher today (long-end underperforming the short-end)…

 

WTI Crude front-month tumbled to a $50 handle at the NYMEX close…

 

Gold is up 11 of the last 13 days to 6 week highs…

 

Gold remains 2017's biggest winner so far… with oil the biggest loser..

via http://ift.tt/2iCmVjf Tyler Durden