The Internet’s Impact on Humanity is Just Getting Started

We have millions of people who are warehoused in almost a larval state in their apartments, watching tv, paying for their medical plans, and glued to this mindless opera of cultural decay that’s recited day after day in front of them. I mean, it’s horrible to imagine — and this is a creation to some degree of the world corporate state, that probably has to be addressed. 

– Terence McKenna, The Internet is the Cure for TV (1994)

I know the title of this post seems strange in light of several factors. First, it’s been nearly twenty years since the dot-com bubble burst and it’s estimated that 3-4 billion people globally, or roughly 50% of the world’s population, already surfs the web. Second, it’s become increasingly trendy in 2017 to highlight all the bad things about the internet, with social media often singled out for the most intense and visceral criticism. Although I acknowledge some very real downsides of social media such as unhealthy obsession and addiction, most of the outrage we’ve seen this year has been focused on “fake news” and “Russia meddling.” In other words, most of the hysteria’s been political in nature, and would barely be registering anywhere near its current decibel level had Hillary Clinton won the election.

All of a sudden, there’s this insistence that social media’s very dangerous primarily because it fosters the creation of echo chambers rife with tribal confirmation bias. Spaces where people with the same views simply talk to one another, and whoever’s willing to be the loudest and most aggressive at signaling to their tribe becomes most popular. I don’t deny that this phenomenon exists, but like with everything else, you have to accept the bad with the good, and in the long-run the good far outweighs the bad. At the end of the day, the main reason so many are having a panic attack right now is because the internet and social media allowed the public to talk to one another directly without being force-fed corporate media narratives and they then decided to reject the chosen one, Hillary Clinton.

As such, the “very smart people” and “experts” have concluded that the problem is with the voter, as opposed to the terrible candidates offered to us, or the corrupt system itself. This is the real reason behind the current obsession with “fake news” and dangerous social media echo chambers. They elites are simply frustrated that their methods of propaganda no longer work as more and more people join online conversations.

In contrast, I’m in the Masha Gessen camp when it comes to what actually happened during the 2016 election. Here’s what she said in a recent interview:

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2k9GdSB
via IFTTT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.