The Ship Has Literally Sailed: Carnival Admits To Coronavirus Case 6 Days After Cruise

The Ship Has Literally Sailed: Carnival Admits To Coronavirus Case 6 Days After Cruise

Minutes before the CDC sent markets reeling by confirming a couple of additional coronavirus cases in the US, Japan authorities confirmed that they’re quarantining a cruise ship after a Hong Kong man who sailed on it last month tested positive for coronavirus.

The cruise ship is set to dock in Yokohama on Monday, according to Reuters.

The 80-year-old man flew to Japan and boarded the ship, the Diamond Princess run by Carnival Japan Inc, in Yokohama on Jan 20 and disembarked on Jan. 25, NHK public broadcaster said.

He developed a cough the day before embarking but did not develop a fever until Jan. 30, a day before he was confirmed to have the virus in Hong Kong, NHK reported.

It was not immediately clear if any of the unknown number of passengers currently on the ship were aboard at the same time as the infected man, but Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told a news conference on Monday that Japanese authorities would quarantine the vessel based on the law.

However, since the infected passenger disembarked nearly a week ago, the ship is undergoing an intensive public health inspection as experts demand that every single person who traveled alongside the infected be quarantined and tested.

The incident is reminiscent of a similar dilemma last week as several suspected cases of the virus led the quarantine of a cruise ship in Italy that was carrying 6,000 passengers.

  • CARNIVAL FALLS 1.2% ON CORONAVIRUS COMMENTS
  • PRINCESS CRUISES SAYS TEST CONFIRMED VIRUS SIX DAYS POST-CRUISE
  • PRINCESS: SHIP IN JAPAN UNDERGOING PUBLIC HEALTH INSPECTION
  • PRINCESS: FORMER PASSENGER TESTED POSITIVE FOR CORONAVIRUS
  • PRINCESS CRUISES COMMENTS ON DELAY OF SHIP IN JAPAN
  • PRINCESS CRUISES SAYS TEST CONFIRMED VIRUS SIX DAYS POST-CRUISE
  • PRINCESS CRUISES COMMENTS ON DELAY OF SHIP IN JAPAN

The news hit shares Carnival since the cruise ship was run by Carnival Japan. The company’s shares also took a hit last week thanks top virus-related fears.

Royal Caribbean is set to report earnings on Tuesday, and with it we should get a hint at how cruise lines are mitigating all ‘rona-related risks.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ueJkOt Tyler Durden

How a second passport saved someone from the Coronavirus

Nicholas Schneider is an American student who was studying in Wuhan, China.

He said, “It’s like a ghost town, barely any people and cars. It’s a weird feeling. I feel like I’m in an apocalypse somehow.”

Wuhan is a city of 11 million where the outbreak of the coronavirus began. Now it’s on lockdown, with hardly anyone allowed to enter, or leave.

Unless, you’re not a Chinese citizen.

The United States embassy arranged for a charter flight to take American citizens out of Wuhan. But they told Nicholas Schneider he would have to arrange his own transportation to the airport.

The airport was 30 miles away.

Under normal circumstances it would be easy to book a ride to the airport. But the Chinese government has shut down most transport in Wuhan in an effort to contain the virus. So Schneider had no way to get to the airport.

The US embassy unceremoniously told him his seat had been given to someone else. The flight took off with 210 passengers, bound for California, and left Schneider behind.

At this point, most people would be out of luck.

But Nicholas Schneider has dual German citizenship. He has a US passport, AND a German passport.

So he called the German embassy.

They offered him a flight out of Wuhan last Saturday AND a bus ride to the airport.

Without dual citizenship, Schneider would still be stuck in the epicenter of this viral outbreak.

Sometimes it’s hard to imagine dual citizenship and a second passport really benefiting you if you aren’t living a James Bond lifestyle. But these are the types of unforeseen circumstances that make a Plan B so important.

I’m not trying to be an alarmist. Quite the opposite. The media tends to terrify people every few years with predictions of a viral apocalypse… and yet we made it through the Swine Flu, Bird Flu, SARS, Ebola, Zika, and so on.

And I’m sure we’ll make it through the Coronavirus too.

But in fairness there are a few things about this one that seem different. Most importantly, according to information released by Chinese public health officials, it appears the virus can spread while still incubating, i.e. the carrier shows no symptoms.

In other words, there are people walking around right now who have become infected with the Coronavirus, and they have no earthly idea.

They don’t even have the sniffles right now. But they are potentially infecting and exposing others to the virus while appearing to be normal and healthy.

Symptoms won’t even show up for 1-2 weeks.

And that means a lot of people left Wuhan a week or more ago have carried the virus to other parts of the world and potentially infected a lot more people.

We won’t know for sure what the real situation is for another week or two. By then, it will be obvious– either the virus will be somewhat contained, or the number of infections will have increased by an order of magnitude.

And that could certainly cause a lot of hysteria.

Remember the facts: statistically speaking, you’re far more likely to die being crushed by a vending machine than you are from the Coronavirus.

But it still doesn’t hurt to have a Plan B.

It’s hard to predict how people and governments will react. We’ve already seen flights cancelled, quarantines, visa suspensions, and more.

And if the virus appears to be spreading, you can bet that there will be a run on surgical masks and potentially even food at the grocery store.

There’s certainly minimal downside to thinking through some of those steps in advance, i.e. stopping by the drug store to buy a mask/goggles, or buying some extra non-perishable food, just in case there’s a stampede next week.

Even if the Coronavirus is a distant memory by Valentine’s Day, you won’t be worse off having those things in your house.

And that’s the whole idea behind a Plan B: no one has a crystal ball. We don’t know what’s going to happen with the Coronavirus, or how people and governments will react.

This isn’t about paranoia. It never is. Sensible, rational people think through risks, especially when there’s an obvious one on the table.

Again, it’s not like anyone is going to be worse off for having some extra non-perishable food, water, or medical supplies around the house. But if the worst happens, you’ll really benefit from cautious, forward thinking.

And something like a second passport really helps mitigate risks in ways that we cannot even begin to imagine, just as happened to Nicholas Schneider.

If you’re interested in learning more, check out this free resource on The Eight Easiest And Fastest Citizenships & Passports To Acquire In 2020.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/2GMDTJl
via IFTTT

Stocks, Oil, Bond Yields Tumble As CDC “Prepares For Pandemic”

Stocks, Oil, Bond Yields Tumble As CDC “Prepares For Pandemic”

After an overnight ramp for absolutely no good reason, US equity markets are fading fast after the CDC said it “was preparing as if Coronavirus was the next pandemic.”

The number of confirmed coronavirus cases in the US is starting to increase at a rather concerning pace, and moments ago, the CDC confirmed in a telebriefing that there are 11 cases in the US.

More ominously, the CDC said that the new Coronavirus case is close contact of other California case, and was spread person-to-person.

Futures erased overnight gains…

WTI Crude is crashing…

And 30Y Yields are back at 2.00%…

so “not contained” then?


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:47

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/36Ud2pp Tyler Durden

Watch Biden Snap At ‘Today’ Show Anchor Over Hunter & Burisma Questions

Watch Biden Snap At ‘Today’ Show Anchor Over Hunter & Burisma Questions

A year ago the mainstream media treated the Biden-Ukraine scandal as a crank conspiracy theory that belonged only to remote corners of the internet. But now, headed into the Iowa caucuses, the mainstream is finally and much-belatedly peppering Joe Biden with the relevant questions. 

On Monday morning the Today show aired a testy interview between the Democratic presidential candidate and co-anchor Savannah Guthrie. In a rare moment, Guthrie pressed the 77-year old candidate on the issue, saying the irony of the Trump impeachment proceedings is that they shine an uncomfortable light on Hunter Biden’s high-paying job on the board of Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings.

Despite what appears his best efforts at straining to control his temper, Biden snaps at one point. With an exasperated look on his face he shoots back: “You’re saying things you don’t know what you’re talking about!”

“This process of impeachment has ensured that everyone knows about Hunter’s dealings with Ukraine,” the Today show co-anchor introduced. 

“Do you think it was wrong for him to take that position knowing it was really because the company wanted access to you?” Guthrie asked.

Well that’s not true! an agitated Biden replied.

 “You’re saying things you don’t know what you’re talking about!”

Biden followed up with claiming “no one has found anything wrong with [Hunter’s] dealings with Ukraine, except it sets a bad image.” 

Noting the “sleazy” optics, Guthrie pressed further. “Was it right?” she asked.

“He says he regretted having done it,” Biden said. “[He] speaks for himself. He’s a grown man.”

The testy exchange clearly sent Joe Biden fuming, in an unusual mainstream moment in which the NBC co-anchor took the Burisma scandal and Biden’s alleged personal meddling in Ukraine’s affairs seriously enough to ask the former Vice President point blank about it.

Judging by how nervous and immediately agitated he got, it’s a question and subject that reporters should have peppering him with long ago.

Commentators on Twitter noted that despite decades in past campaigns and as a seasoned political office holder, Biden is not used to fielding tough or pointed questions from the press.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/36W1NMS Tyler Durden

TSLA Goes Full AOL – Explodes 25% In 3 Days

TSLA Goes Full AOL – Explodes 25% In 3 Days

TSLA shares are exploding higher once again today as it appears another hedge fund pukes its shorts into this exponential run.

As short interest is eviscerated…

The catalysts for this latest move – according to the narrative machine – are numerous…

Earlier today, Panasonic, which makes batteries for Tesla at its jointly operated battery plant in Nevada, said the business turned profitable in the quarter ended Dec. 31. The rapid increase in Tesla’s output helped push that business into the black, Panasonic Chief Financial Officer Hirokazu Umeda told reporters in Tokyo on Monday, declining to give specific figures.

Another boost came from Argus analyst Bill Selesky, who raised his price target on Tesla to a Street-high of $808 from $556, reflecting revenue growth from the legacy Model S and Model X cars, as well as strong demand for the new Model 3, which accounted for more than 80% of fourth-quarter production.

“Despite past production delays, parts shortages, labor cost overruns, and other difficulties, we expect Tesla to benefit from its dominant position in the electric vehicle industry and to improve performance in 2020 and beyond,” the analyst wrote in a note to clients. Selesky reiterated a buy rating.

Also, over the weekend, ardent Tesla bull Catherine Wood of ARK Investment Management said in an interview with Bloomberg that the stock is still “incredibly undervalued.” According to ARK’s latest note, published on Jan. 31, its 2024 expected value per share for Tesla is $7,000.

It seems TSLA is the new AOL!!

Source: Bloomberg

Tesla is now 40% bigger than Volkswagen…(and bigger than Ford, GM and BMW combined).

Source: Bloomberg

VOW made 10.8MM cars in 2019, TSLA expects to make 500,000 cars this year.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/37VkC4k Tyler Durden

Inside the Campaign to Legalize Magic Mushrooms in California in 2020

On May 7, 2019, Denver voted to become the first city in America to decriminalize magic mushrooms. On June 4, 2019, Oakland, California, decriminalized all psychedelic plants and fungi. On January 28, 2020, the neighboring Bay Area city of Santa Cruz followed suit. And now statewide efforts are underway in Washington state, Oregon, and California.

“When it comes to psychedelics, we feel people should have the freedom of choice,” says Ryan Dunevar, the head of Decriminalize California. “In essence, cognitive liberty.” 

Now the group wants to take the psychedelic decriminalization movement a step further by convincing California voters not only to deprioritize enforcement of laws against the possession and consumption of psychedelics but to create a legal framework for commercial sales via ballot initiative.

“We realized, all right, let’s make sure nobody else goes to jail for this. Let’s give it a proper, regulated system,” says Dunevar. “And we realized in order to do that, you’d actually have to, in essence, legalize sales.”

But this approach is controversial within the movement. “We led from a place of love—that is we didn’t push commodification. We pushed equitable access and just decriminalizing our relationship with nature,” says Carlos Plazola, head of Decriminalize Nature. “The city basically said, ‘We recognize the healing effect of these plants.’ So the citizenry hears that and says, ‘Oh, I’m, I’m curious now.’ And because it’s sanctioned…people are stepping into those healing spaces with less fear,” says Plazola.

Plazola is a veteran political operative in Oakland who runs his operation out of the Haven, a community center that serves as a hub for members of the Bay Area’s psychedelic community. They gather to share their experiences and participate in so-called integrative circles.

“People come and talk about their psychedelic experiences and unpack them in a supportive group setting,” says Danielle Negrin of San Francisco Psychedelic Society.

The gatherings are geared towards those who’ve had intense trips and want to share information about the application of psychedelics in therapy and addiction treatment, says Negrin.

“Decriminalization is a risk reduction strategy,” says Larry Norris of ERIE, which also facilitates integration circles. “We’re allowing people to feel less concerned about the risk they might [face] for coming out.” 

Norris favors decriminalization over legalization, in part because the latter would require the state to create a regulatory framework.

“We believe in an inalienable right to have our own relationship to nature,” says Norris. “There’s no reason for us to have to go to a dispensary or go to a pharmaceutical company to get the things that we can grow out of the ground.”

Dr. Charles Grob, director of adolescent and child psychiatry at UCLA-Harborside, is worried that the decriminalization and legalization movements could undermine the significant progress made in the field of psychedelic research.

“My concern is, to what degree will it attract the attention of individuals who…don’t understand how to optimally structure the experience,” says Charles Grob, who co-authored a landmark study involving the dosing of terminal cancer patients with psilocybin.

Grob wants psychedelics to be used primarily in clinical settings for now.

“What we observed [in the cancer study] was that our subjects…were in [a] great existential crisis. Their sense of self had eroded….There was often a sense of loss of meaning, loss of purpose,” says Grob.

He says that after one to two psychotherapy-assisted psilocybin sessions, patients showed a measurable decrease in anxiety and were often able to “reestablish that sense of self, continuity with the previous parts of their lives, and strengthen their sense of meaning and purpose.”

Grob is one of many scientists doing psychedelic research, a field that has experienced several breakthroughs in recent years thanks to the decades-long effort of the Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies (MAPS).

MAPS has funded studies treating PTSD in veterans with MDMA, more commonly known as ecstasy. The results were so promising that the FDA designated it a “breakthrough therapy,” fast-tracking the approval process so that the treatment could be available by as early as 2021, pending completion of phase 3 clinical trials.

Grob is wary of making psychedelics available for purchase to the public without guidance from experienced professionals in a clinical setting.

“Nothing is without risk,” says Grob, who has published research about adverse interactions between certain psychedelics and SSRI antidepressants. 

“Some people are simply too vulnerable,” says Grob. “Some individuals have some underlying risk for psychotic illness….[Users] need to be in a very quiet setting, ideally out in nature, but protected. You’re with someone at all times who is not tripping.” 

But Dunevar from Decriminalize California worries that legalizing only medical uses would be too restrictive.

The cost of therapy “eliminates a lot of people, which means basically only rich white people would be able to use it,” says Dunevar.

Norris agrees that barriers to entry need to be lowered.

“This is a people’s movement,” says Norris.”There’s a much broader range of people who maybe can’t get into the cultural ethos of a clinical system, maybe can’t afford a clinical system.” 

And Negrin points out that people have long been consuming psychedelics and that they will continue to do so, regardless of the legal status.

“It’s been happening for thousands of years. People have been working with psychedelics and healing with these medicines,” she says. “Are we going to accept that that’s happening or are we going to ignore that that’s happening?”

Grob acknowledges that psychedelics have been used “since time immemorial by indigenous peoples,” but says that in those cultures they were used “within the context of ritual ceremony.”

“We live in a very different culture, where all bets are off, and a lot of the built-in safety features you’re going to find in indigenous cultures surrounding the use of powerful sacred plants do not necessarily exist.”

The California attorney general’s office approved the psychedelic legalization initiative’s language in early January, and the campaign is currently collecting the 625,000 signatures it needs to qualify for the ballot. Dunevar believes this is the biggest challenge the campaign will face.

“This thing is won or lost in the next five months as it is,” says Dunevar.  

Plazola hopes that the decriminalization movement doesn’t stop with Oakland, with California, or with the U.S.

“My hope for the next five years for the decriminalization movement is that it’s an international movement, that it’s being talked about at the United Nations,” says Plazola. Psychedelics “never should have been made illegal to begin with, nor should any relationship between humans and nature be made illegal.”

Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by John Osterhoust, James Lee Marsh, and Weissmueller. Additional sound editing by Ian Keyser. 

Photo credits: Magic mushroom in the forest, Photo 42494972 © Kmetix, Dreamstime.com

 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2ueF1mh
via IFTTT

Inside the Campaign to Legalize Magic Mushrooms in California in 2020

On May 7, 2019, Denver voted to become the first city in America to decriminalize magic mushrooms. On June 4, 2019, Oakland, California, decriminalized all psychedelic plants and fungi. On January 28, 2020, the neighboring Bay Area city of Santa Cruz followed suit. And now statewide efforts are underway in Washington state, Oregon, and California.

“When it comes to psychedelics, we feel people should have the freedom of choice,” says Ryan Dunevar, the head of Decriminalize California. “In essence, cognitive liberty.” 

Now the group wants to take the psychedelic decriminalization movement a step further by convincing California voters not only to deprioritize enforcement of laws against the possession and consumption of psychedelics but to create a legal framework for commercial sales via ballot initiative.

“We realized, all right, let’s make sure nobody else goes to jail for this. Let’s give it a proper, regulated system,” says Dunevar. “And we realized in order to do that, you’d actually have to, in essence, legalize sales.”

But this approach is controversial within the movement. “We led from a place of love—that is we didn’t push commodification. We pushed equitable access and just decriminalizing our relationship with nature,” says Carlos Plazola, head of Decriminalize Nature. “The city basically said, ‘We recognize the healing effect of these plants.’ So the citizenry hears that and says, ‘Oh, I’m, I’m curious now.’ And because it’s sanctioned…people are stepping into those healing spaces with less fear,” says Plazola.

Plazola is a veteran political operative in Oakland who runs his operation out of the Haven, a community center that serves as a hub for members of the Bay Area’s psychedelic community. They gather to share their experiences and participate in so-called integrative circles.

“People come and talk about their psychedelic experiences and unpack them in a supportive group setting,” says Danielle Negrin of San Francisco Psychedelic Society.

The gatherings are geared towards those who’ve had intense trips and want to share information about the application of psychedelics in therapy and addiction treatment, says Negrin.

“Decriminalization is a risk reduction strategy,” says Larry Norris of ERIE, which also facilitates integration circles. “We’re allowing people to feel less concerned about the risk they might [face] for coming out.” 

Norris favors decriminalization over legalization, in part because the latter would require the state to create a regulatory framework.

“We believe in an inalienable right to have our own relationship to nature,” says Norris. “There’s no reason for us to have to go to a dispensary or go to a pharmaceutical company to get the things that we can grow out of the ground.”

Dr. Charles Grob, director of adolescent and child psychiatry at UCLA-Harborside, is worried that the decriminalization and legalization movements could undermine the significant progress made in the field of psychedelic research.

“My concern is, to what degree will it attract the attention of individuals who…don’t understand how to optimally structure the experience,” says Charles Grob, who co-authored a landmark study involving the dosing of terminal cancer patients with psilocybin.

Grob wants psychedelics to be used primarily in clinical settings for now.

“What we observed [in the cancer study] was that our subjects…were in [a] great existential crisis. Their sense of self had eroded….There was often a sense of loss of meaning, loss of purpose,” says Grob.

He says that after one to two psychotherapy-assisted psilocybin sessions, patients showed a measurable decrease in anxiety and were often able to “reestablish that sense of self, continuity with the previous parts of their lives, and strengthen their sense of meaning and purpose.”

Grob is one of many scientists doing psychedelic research, a field that has experienced several breakthroughs in recent years thanks to the decades-long effort of the Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies (MAPS).

MAPS has funded studies treating PTSD in veterans with MDMA, more commonly known as ecstasy. The results were so promising that the FDA designated it a “breakthrough therapy,” fast-tracking the approval process so that the treatment could be available by as early as 2021, pending completion of phase 3 clinical trials.

Grob is wary of making psychedelics available for purchase to the public without guidance from experienced professionals in a clinical setting.

“Nothing is without risk,” says Grob, who has published research about adverse interactions between certain psychedelics and SSRI antidepressants. 

“Some people are simply too vulnerable,” says Grob. “Some individuals have some underlying risk for psychotic illness….[Users] need to be in a very quiet setting, ideally out in nature, but protected. You’re with someone at all times who is not tripping.” 

But Dunevar from Decriminalize California worries that legalizing only medical uses would be too restrictive.

The cost of therapy “eliminates a lot of people, which means basically only rich white people would be able to use it,” says Dunevar.

Norris agrees that barriers to entry need to be lowered.

“This is a people’s movement,” says Norris.”There’s a much broader range of people who maybe can’t get into the cultural ethos of a clinical system, maybe can’t afford a clinical system.” 

And Negrin points out that people have long been consuming psychedelics and that they will continue to do so, regardless of the legal status.

“It’s been happening for thousands of years. People have been working with psychedelics and healing with these medicines,” she says. “Are we going to accept that that’s happening or are we going to ignore that that’s happening?”

Grob acknowledges that psychedelics have been used “since time immemorial by indigenous peoples,” but says that in those cultures they were used “within the context of ritual ceremony.”

“We live in a very different culture, where all bets are off, and a lot of the built-in safety features you’re going to find in indigenous cultures surrounding the use of powerful sacred plants do not necessarily exist.”

The California attorney general’s office approved the psychedelic legalization initiative’s language in early January, and the campaign is currently collecting the 625,000 signatures it needs to qualify for the ballot. Dunevar believes this is the biggest challenge the campaign will face.

“This thing is won or lost in the next five months as it is,” says Dunevar.  

Plazola hopes that the decriminalization movement doesn’t stop with Oakland, with California, or with the U.S.

“My hope for the next five years for the decriminalization movement is that it’s an international movement, that it’s being talked about at the United Nations,” says Plazola. Psychedelics “never should have been made illegal to begin with, nor should any relationship between humans and nature be made illegal.”

Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by John Osterhoust, James Lee Marsh, and Weissmueller. Additional sound editing by Ian Keyser. 

Photo credits: Magic mushroom in the forest, Photo 42494972 © Kmetix, Dreamstime.com

 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2ueF1mh
via IFTTT

Boeing 767 Makes Emergency Landing After Part Of Landing Gear Falls Off; Stock Slides

Boeing 767 Makes Emergency Landing After Part Of Landing Gear Falls Off; Stock Slides

Facing dire, if not terminal, issues with its 737 MAX which may or may not fly again (ideally with passengers not at gunpoint), while cutting production on the 787 Dreamliner due to slumping demand, at least Boeing’s legacy long haul workhorse, the 767, had managed to fly between the cracks, so to speak.

No more. Moments ago Boeing stock promptly dropped into the red after Spanish airport operator AENA said that a Boeing 767 aircraft flown by Air Canada was returning to Adolfo Suarez Madrid-Barajas airport for an emergency landing on Monday after reporting a “technical issue”. The airliner called air traffic control 30 minutes after takeoff and requested a slot for an emergency landing, an AENA spokeswoman told Reuters.

A subsequent report clarified that the technical issue involved a part of landing gear falling off and entering the airplane’s engine.

Spain’s main pilots union Sepla posted a tweet saying a Boeing 767 aircraft flown by Air Canada was returning to Madrid airport for an emergency landing after part of its landing gear fell off and entered its engines

Spain’s air navigation manager Enaire confirmed: “A flight with a technical problem is circling Madrid before returning to Adolfo Suarez Madrid Barajas airport.”

A spokesman for a regional government-run emergency services coordinator said: “We have sent various emergency response resources to the airport because of problems with a plane.”

A spokesman for the airport operator said: “The airport is on standby to receive flight Air Canada flight AK837 which was bound for Toronto.”

In kneejerk reaction, Boeing stock slumped to session lows, briefly dropping in the red as Boeing’s troubles appear to never end.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:19

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RVoj4c Tyler Durden

Coronavirus: How Bad Will It Get?

Coronavirus: How Bad Will It Get?

Authored by Adam Taggart via PeakProsperity.com,

The official data on the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus continues to suggest a geometric growth rate.

Which explains why more and more infectious disease experts are now openly calling the virus a full-blown global pandemic.

So how bad might things get?

It’s worth noting at this point that the data we do have, mostly from the Chinese government, is still scant and suspect. Many think the situation is China is worse than is being reported — potentially much worse.

Frustratingly, the Western press seems bent on downplaying the coronavirus threat, many trying to convince us that the standard flu is more dangerous. Which is NOT true, at least in terms of survivability.

So, we must continue to educate ourselves as best we can.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:16

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RT0nhZ Tyler Durden

Senate To Call ‘Whistleblower’ As Part Of Three-Pronged Investigation Into Impeachment Origins

Senate To Call ‘Whistleblower’ As Part Of Three-Pronged Investigation Into Impeachment Origins

Senate Republicans are gearing up for a three-pronged investigation into the origins of Congressional Democrats’ impeachment of President Trump, according to the Washington Examiner.

I want to understand how all this crap started,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures, who added that the Senate would begin their investigations “within weeks.”

“The Senate Intel Committee under Richard Burr has told us that they will call the whistleblower,” said Graham.

Whether it’s a legitimate search for the truth or a convenient way to assuage frustrated Republicans who wanted fireworks during the Senate impeachment trial has yet to be seen.

Let’s recall what Senate Republicans plan to unravel;

The Whistelblower, outed by investigative reporter Paul Sperry as Eric Ciaramella, is a registered Democrat who worked for then-VP Joe Biden, former CIA Director John Brennan, and was appointed by former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in June, 2017 as his personal aide according to RedState. Ciaramella, who radio host Rush Limbaugh called “essentially a spy for John Brennan,” was also a frequent visitor to the Obama White House.

In November, the Washington Examiner reported: “It is likely that the whistleblower traveled on Air Force Two at least one of the six visits that Biden made to Ukraine.

If the whistleblower is a former employee of — associate of Joe Biden, I think that would be important. If the whistleblower was working with people on Schiff’s staff that wanted to take Trump down a year-and-a-half ago, I think that would be important. If the Schiff staff people helped write the complaint, that would be important. We’re going to get to the bottom of all of this to make sure this never happens again,” said Sen. Graham.

After hearing second-hand about a July 25 call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky in which Trump asked for investigations into the Bidens, Ciaramella approached impeachment chieftain Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA)’s office (which hired two of Ciaramella’s colleagues last year, including Sean Misko, who was hired in August).

Schiff’s team directed Ciaramella to “Coup has started” Democratic operative attorney Mark Zaid (who vowed to “get rid of” Trump in July of 2017), who helped the CIA ‘whistleblower’ file a complaint on a form which had been altered to allow hearsay.

What’s more, at least two of Ciaramella’s colleagues from the National Security Counsel were hired by Schiff’s office last year – including Sean Misko, who was hired in August.

And Schiff continues to deny knowledge of the whistleblower’s identity.

Democrats, pointing to the Trump administration placing a hold on US military aid to Ukraine, unbeknownst to Zelensky, argued that President Trump abused his office and obstructed Congress’ investigation. During last week’s Senate trial, Trump’s attorneys argued that his actions fell far short of impeachable offense.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 10:55

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RVjfgc Tyler Durden