Review: Skin: A History of Nudity in the Movies

loder-skin2

Looking back on the cinematic sexy-wars of the last century from the promised land of total pornography we inhabit today must be a little puzzling for young cinephiles. Was there really a time when people got bent out of shape by the lewd wisecracks of Mae West, the rather basic butt-baring of Brigitte Bardot, the epic but completely covered-up bosom of Jane Russell? Yes, kids, it’s true.

This long-gone era is enlighteningly surveyed in a new documentary called Skin: A History of Nudity in the Movies. Given the credits of some of the film’s producers (Paul Fishbein was a founder of Adult Video News, the porn industry trade mag, and Jim McBride is an internet archivist better-known by his nom de website, “Mr. Skin”), you might expect the movie to be raunchier than it is. Yes, there are plenty of boobs and bottoms on display here, in pictures ranging from the 1933 Ecstasy (Hedy Lamar striking a blow for naked forest-scampering) and the 1927 Wings (Clara Bow flashing a breast in the first movie to win an Oscar) up through the 1974 Big Bad Mama (Angie Dickinson totally, as they say, nude), Fast Times at Ridgemont High (Phoebe Cates’s topless-red-bikini scene), and the incomparable Showgirls and American Pie (about which good-natured lust object Shannon Elizabeth has a few words to say).

But Skin also has considerable straight narrative history to impart. Reaching back to the turn of the last century, it shows that moving-picture pioneers like Edward Muybridge and Georges Méliès incorporated glimpses of nudity in their work without a second thought. D.W. Griffith’s 1916 Intolerance branched out into orgies, and filmmaking remained a relatively freewheeling proposition until the 1930s, when the industry cooked up the buzz-killing Motion Picture Production Code, a self-regulating dodge to head off government censorship. The MPPC started a long slow collapse in the 1950s, with the arrival of, among other things, primitive softcore movies called “nudies.” (Francis Ford Coppola launched his career with a 1962 nudie called Tonight for Sure, and the late Russ Meyer explains here how he shot The Immoral Mr. Teas, his big 1959 nudie hit, in four days for just $24,000.)

The movie is filled with fun stories, most of them fairly well-known but so what. The 1979 Caligula started out as a dignified historical drama with a script by Gore Vidal and a fancy cast that included Malcolm McDowell, John Gielgud, and Peter O’Toole, but it was turned into a flat-out porn film with additional shoots by the movie’s producer, Penthouse magazine publisher Bob Guccione. Oliver Reed and Alan Bates’s non-erotic nude wrestling scene in the 1969 Women in Love was clumsily reedited by nervous producers to dispel any gay overtones—and ended up having nothing but gay overtones. And then there was teenage Brooke Shields, who won the first Golden Raspberry Award—for worst actress—for her lightly attired performance in the 1980 Blue Lagoon.

Things are said to be different on the movie-nudity front these days. Now sex scenes are being shot under the watchful eyes of people called “intimacy coordinators,” whose job is to protect female actors from unwanted exploitation, and presumably to head off anything along the lines of Jack Nicholson and Jessica Lange’s super-believable rutting in the 1981 The Postman Always Rings Twice. This is all good, surely. But when one of these intimacy coordinators pops up here to say, “We are thrilled to be part of the solution,” you can’t help reflexively wondering exactly which problem they mean.

(Skin: A History of Nudity in the Movies is available on YouTube, Fandango, Vudu and other on-demand sites.)

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2FnhbKu
via IFTTT

Review: Skin: A History of Nudity in the Movies

loder-skin2

Looking back on the cinematic sexy-wars of the last century from the promised land of total pornography we inhabit today must be a little puzzling for young cinephiles. Was there really a time when people got bent out of shape by the lewd wisecracks of Mae West, the rather basic butt-baring of Brigitte Bardot, the epic but completely covered-up bosom of Jane Russell? Yes, kids, it’s true.

This long-gone era is enlighteningly surveyed in a new documentary called Skin: A History of Nudity in the Movies. Given the credits of some of the film’s producers (Paul Fishbein was a founder of Adult Video News, the porn industry trade mag, and Jim McBride is an internet archivist better-known by his nom de website, “Mr. Skin”), you might expect the movie to be raunchier than it is. Yes, there are plenty of boobs and bottoms on display here, in pictures ranging from the 1933 Ecstasy (Hedy Lamar striking a blow for naked forest-scampering) and the 1927 Wings (Clara Bow flashing a breast in the first movie to win an Oscar) up through the 1974 Big Bad Mama (Angie Dickinson totally, as they say, nude), Fast Times at Ridgemont High (Phoebe Cates’s topless-red-bikini scene), and the incomparable Showgirls and American Pie (about which good-natured lust object Shannon Elizabeth has a few words to say).

But Skin also has considerable straight narrative history to impart. Reaching back to the turn of the last century, it shows that moving-picture pioneers like Edward Muybridge and Georges Méliès incorporated glimpses of nudity in their work without a second thought. D.W. Griffith’s 1916 Intolerance branched out into orgies, and filmmaking remained a relatively freewheeling proposition until the 1930s, when the industry cooked up the buzz-killing Motion Picture Production Code, a self-regulating dodge to head off government censorship. The MPPC started a long slow collapse in the 1950s, with the arrival of, among other things, primitive softcore movies called “nudies.” (Francis Ford Coppola launched his career with a 1962 nudie called Tonight for Sure, and the late Russ Meyer explains here how he shot The Immoral Mr. Teas, his big 1959 nudie hit, in four days for just $24,000.)

The movie is filled with fun stories, most of them fairly well-known but so what. The 1979 Caligula started out as a dignified historical drama with a script by Gore Vidal and a fancy cast that included Malcolm McDowell, John Gielgud, and Peter O’Toole, but it was turned into a flat-out porn film with additional shoots by the movie’s producer, Penthouse magazine publisher Bob Guccione. Oliver Reed and Alan Bates’s non-erotic nude wrestling scene in the 1969 Women in Love was clumsily reedited by nervous producers to dispel any gay overtones—and ended up having nothing but gay overtones. And then there was teenage Brooke Shields, who won the first Golden Raspberry Award—for worst actress—for her lightly attired performance in the 1980 Blue Lagoon.

Things are said to be different on the movie-nudity front these days. Now sex scenes are being shot under the watchful eyes of people called “intimacy coordinators,” whose job is to protect female actors from unwanted exploitation, and presumably to head off anything along the lines of Jack Nicholson and Jessica Lange’s super-believable rutting in the 1981 The Postman Always Rings Twice. This is all good, surely. But when one of these intimacy coordinators pops up here to say, “We are thrilled to be part of the solution,” you can’t help reflexively wondering exactly which problem they mean.

(Skin: A History of Nudity in the Movies is available on YouTube, Fandango, Vudu and other on-demand sites.)

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2FnhbKu
via IFTTT

UK Strikes Historic Free Trade Deal With Japan As Brussels Threatens To Abandon Talks

UK Strikes Historic Free Trade Deal With Japan As Brussels Threatens To Abandon Talks

Tyler Durden

Fri, 09/11/2020 – 07:18

After a solid nine-month stretch that was blissfully devoid of major Brexit-related news as the global COVID-19 pandemic raged on, we declared last night that Brexit talks “suddenly matter again” as the drop in the pound was blamed – incorrectly, as Bloomberg later determined – for  triggering yesterday’s intraday declines in US markets.

But on Friday morning, American traders awoke to some surprisingly positive trade news out of Great Britain. A trade deal with Japan had been agreed to in principle, which would – if finally ratified by both countries – allow 99% of the UK’s exports to Japan to cross the border tariff-free.

What’s more, the deal even gave Johnson the opportunity to gloat, as Reuters reported the digital and data provisions in the agreement went “far beyond” those in the EU’s trade deal with Japan.

The deal also allowed BoJo to show voters that Brexit is already giving them new options to strike favorable free trade deals.

Though, unsurprisingly, the PM’s critics insist that these deals won’t replace the trade lost from the EU. Though that, of course, remains to be seen.

Critics say such agreements are unlikely to replace exports lost to the EU if a deal cannot be struck with Brussels.

The EU has ordered Britain to scrap a plan to break their divorce treaty, but Johnson’s government has refused, potentially sinking four years of Brexit talks.

Japan wanted to reach broad consensus with Britain on trade this week before a change in government in Tokyo which could have caused the negotiations to drift.

While Britain hailed the deal as a “historic moment”, analysts remained mostly focused on the outlook for talks with Brussels, and most importantly, the outlook for BoJo’s Inter-market bill.

An FT opinion piece suggested that the proposed legislation could once again be “domestic cover for concessions to come.”

The British press has been pounding on Boris Johnson for pushing ahead with the draft legislation, known as the “Intermarket Bill”, that would – at least on paper – invalidate the Irish Backstop provision of the withdrawal agreement. But BoJo has disappointed the doubters before. Will he do it again?

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ZtnbZ9 Tyler Durden

Watch: NFL Opener ‘Racial Unity’ Moment Sees Stadium Erupt In Boos

Watch: NFL Opener ‘Racial Unity’ Moment Sees Stadium Erupt In Boos

Tyler Durden

Fri, 09/11/2020 – 06:58

Who would have thought that sports fans just want to watch… sports?

Thursday night’s return of the NFL which saw the Kansas City Chiefs host the Houston Texans began with an “End Racism” message of unity (words which were also emblazoned at the end of the field).

As Mediaite details, things went downhill despite the special display: “The Kansas City Chiefs hosted the Houston Texans Thursday evening for the NFL’s opening game of the 2020 season, and intended to provide a show of unity by locking arms with their teammates and opponents before the game — but the solemnity of the moment was ruined by fans booing in the stands.”

Yes it’s confirmed, not just in this latest booing incident, but Gallup polling shows the Great Awokening of professional sports is alienating many, perhaps most:

The sports industry now has a negative image, on balance, among Americans as a whole, with 30% viewing it positively and 40% negatively, for a -10 net-positive score. This contrasts with the +20 net positive image it enjoyed in 2019, when 45% viewed it positively and 25% negatively.

This slide in the sports industry’s image comes as professional and college leagues are struggling, and not always successfully, to maintain regular schedules and playing seasons amid the pandemic. Professional football, baseball and basketball games have also become focal points for public displays of support for the Black Lives Matter movement.

And of course the NFL fans present for the Chiefs-Texans game were later subject of media anger and outrage for the boos which were clearly picked up by NBC’s cameras.

One editorial haranguing the booing crowd even admitted that the Chiefs later tried to edit the audio in Twitter clips to make it look like there was broad “support” among fans in the stadium for the moment of silence and racial unity display:

All the excuses racists had are now used up. Only one member of the Chiefs kneeled during the national anthem. The Texans elected to stay in the locker room, later joining the Chiefs for a show of support — with both teams earning the vitriol of fans for daring to have a voice.

It was an unmistakable and shameful moment that, try as they might, the Chiefs weren’t able to hide. Whether through editing, or questionable audio work, the team’s official Twitter account desperately tried to present to the world an image of fans in attendance cheering players, not booing.

But again maybe, just maybe, fans are tired of having sports fields and arenas become scenes of endless political debate where “to kneel or not to kneel” has somehow become the prime question, which can make or break a season, or a player’s contract and future livelihood. 

Or perhaps they also recognize that such corporate sponsored vapid group exercises are intended as minimalist gestures merely to satisfy the PC mob and advertisers. 

It seems nowadays that when you purchase a ticket, you should be prepared for part seminar replete with slogans and messaging all around, and part ballgame. 

Via Yahoo News

As for Thursday’s game, there’s also the theory that the boos were primarily aimed at the Texans, who took the field slightly late as the “unity” message was already underway:

At Thursday’s NFL season opener, the Houston Texans stayed in their locker room for both the pregame playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” and “Lift Every Voice and Sing,” which is often called the Black national anthem.

Regardless, it’s not at all what the league expected, and certainly NBC and NFL execs looked on in horror worrying more about the advertising revenue bottom line.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3hkb2f6 Tyler Durden

Lose Yo Job

minisloseyojobYouTube

If the movement against abusive policing has an anthem, it’s “Lose Yo Job,” a rap spontaneously composed by Johnniqua Charles as she was detained outside a strip club in South Carolina in February. A video shot that night shows her wagging her butt and taunting a security guard as he holds her by the elbow. “You about to lose yo job,” she chants. “You about to lose yo job/ Get this dance!/ You about to lose yo job/ ‘Cause you are detaining me for nothin’.”

Charles was eventually released, and the guard himself later posted the video online, declaring “that rap was lit.” It went viral on a small scale, and then a remix by the producers DJ Suede and DJ iMarkkeyz went viral on a huge scale. It was helped along by an absurdist video featuring unauthorized cameos by everyone from Beyoncé to Elmo. More pointedly, the video showed the Minneapolis cops charged in the death of George Floyd. Soon activists were chanting the lyrics at demonstrations.

Since the song took off, Charles has raised more than $55,000 on GoFundMe. And the security guard? He still has his job, and TMZ reports that the video has landed him offers to work elsewhere too.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3k8qVHg
via IFTTT

Lose Yo Job

minisloseyojobYouTube

If the movement against abusive policing has an anthem, it’s “Lose Yo Job,” a rap spontaneously composed by Johnniqua Charles as she was detained outside a strip club in South Carolina in February. A video shot that night shows her wagging her butt and taunting a security guard as he holds her by the elbow. “You about to lose yo job,” she chants. “You about to lose yo job/ Get this dance!/ You about to lose yo job/ ‘Cause you are detaining me for nothin’.”

Charles was eventually released, and the guard himself later posted the video online, declaring “that rap was lit.” It went viral on a small scale, and then a remix by the producers DJ Suede and DJ iMarkkeyz went viral on a huge scale. It was helped along by an absurdist video featuring unauthorized cameos by everyone from Beyoncé to Elmo. More pointedly, the video showed the Minneapolis cops charged in the death of George Floyd. Soon activists were chanting the lyrics at demonstrations.

Since the song took off, Charles has raised more than $55,000 on GoFundMe. And the security guard? He still has his job, and TMZ reports that the video has landed him offers to work elsewhere too.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3k8qVHg
via IFTTT

Corona “Marshals” Patrol UK Cities To Enforce Social-Distancing

Corona “Marshals” Patrol UK Cities To Enforce Social-Distancing

Tyler Durden

Fri, 09/11/2020 – 05:00

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A new enforcement team of ‘Coronavirus Marshals’ will be employed by the government to patrol cities in order to police social distancing, the UK government has announced.

Last night Downing Street unveiled new lockdown measures making it illegal for people to gather in groups of more than six from Monday onwards.

The rise in COVID-19 cases has been blamed on young people gathering for social events.

This will be tackled by newly empowered ‘Marshals’ and ‘Environmental Health Officers’ who will roam the streets looking for people violating social distancing rules.

“We will launch a register of newly qualified and recently retired Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) so that Local Authorities can recruit more quickly and fill any gaps. In addition, we will introduce COVID-19 Secure Marshals to help local authorities support social distancing in towns and city centres,” a statement said.

Businesses will also now be mandated to enter customers into NHS ‘track and trace’ databases and keep the data for 21 days.

The new measures were brought in despite the fact that coronavirus deaths and hospitalizations have completely flatlined.

As Toby Young explains, the rise in coronavirus cases is purely down to the fact that many more tests are being done and they’re picking up false positives.

There have been 1.3 million coronavirus tests in the UK in the past week alone, compared to just 95,188 in the first week of April.

Despite this crucial factor, nightly news broadcasts are solely focusing on the case numbers to hysterically fearmonger about a “second wave” that just isn’t happening in reality.

*  *  *

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ZurraV Tyler Durden

Brickbat: No Room at the Inn

GraceChurch_1161x653

The Los Angeles County Public Works Department has notified Grace Community Church it is terminating a lease for a parking lot the church has held since 1975. Church leaders say this is in retaliation for its so far successful challenge to state mandate’s barring indoor church services. The county has repeatedly tried to get a court order to close the church without success. County officials had warned church leaders of “repercussions” if they did not comply with the mandates.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Zqw59V
via IFTTT