Frenzied Futures Rally Fizzles As All Eyes Turn To Fed’s Taper Announcement

Frenzied Futures Rally Fizzles As All Eyes Turn To Fed’s Taper Announcement

US futures and European bourses retreated slightly from record highs as investors weighed the ever worsening supply crunch and virus curbs in China against strong earnings with all eyes turning to the conclusion of the Fed’s 2-day meeting tomorrow, when Powell will announce the launch of a $15BN/month taper. At 7:20 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 7 points, or 0.02%, S&P 500 e-minis were down 0.50 points, or 0.01%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 28.75 points, or 0.18%. Iron-ore futures tumbled on shrinking steal output in China. Tesla led premarket losses in New York.

Investors paused to reflect on a rally that’s taken U.S. and European stocks to record highs. With a post-pandemic supply crunch stoking inflation and pushing central banks to tighten monetary policy, they have begun to question valuations. Economic recovery is also under strain as countries from China to Bulgaria report rising Covid cases. Both the S&P 500 Index and the Dow have been scaling new peaks as U.S. companies post another stellar quarter for earnings. Of the 295 companies in the equity benchmark that have reported results, 87% have either met or surpassed estimates.

Dow futures slipped after the underlying gauge briefly surged past the 36,000 mark on Monday. Russell 2000 contracts rose. Bonds from Europe to the U.S. jumped after Australia signaled patience with rate increases despite abandoning Yield Curve Control due to “economic improvement.” Yields on the two-year and five-year Treasuries fell as the RBA joined global central banks inching closer to policy tightening. However, the central bank’s insistence on remaining patient with rate hikes pushed traders to pare back hawkish bets in Australia as well as in global bond markets during European hours.

“The Fed meeting could still shake the markets, because even though we know the concrete outcome of the meeting, which is the opening bell of the QE tapering, the risks remain tilted to the hawkish side,” said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote. “Still, investors prefer seeing the glass half full.”

In early trading, Tesla tumbled 5%, retreating from a gamma-squeeze record on Monday after Elon Musk said the carmaker hasn’t yet signed a contract with Hertz Global for Model 3 sedans. Chegg slumped 32% after the online-education company cut revenue forecasts and its results missed estimates, prompting a raft of downgrades. Clorox rose 1.6% after the bleach maker posted upbeat first-quarter results. Simon Property Group added 4.2% after the mall operator raised its 2021 forecast for profit and quarterly dividend. Pfizer gained 2.4% after the drugmaker boosted (get it “boosted”?) its full-year sales forecast for the company’s COVID-19 vaccine to $36 billion. Here are some of the biggest U.S. movers today:

  • Tesla drops as much as 6.9% in premarket trading after closing at a record on Monday after Elon Musk said the electric vehicle-maker hasn’t yet signed a contract with Hertz Global.
  • Chegg slumps 31% after the online education company slashed revenue forecasts and posted quarterly results that missed estimates.
  • Novavax gains 5.3%, signaling an extension of Monday’s 16% rally, amid optimism over Covid vaccine approvals.
  • Triterras tumbles as much as 20% after the short seller target said it encountered an “unanticipated delay in the finalization” of an independent audit of its financial statements.
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries depositary receipts rise 7.7% and Endo International (ENDP US) gains 6.3% after the firms joined other former opioid makers in scoring a litigation win.
  • Geron gains 4.5% and and SAB Bio (SABS US) soars 39% after Baird starts coverage of both with outperform ratings.
  • Cryptocurrency-related stocks gained in premarket trading on Tuesday, as Bitcoin climbed and Etherium hit a record high.    NXT-ID up 38.18% premarket, Marathon Digital +4.0%, Riot Blockchain +2.9%, Bit Digital +2.5%, Canaan +3.2%, Coinbase +2.0%, MicroStrategy +1.5%

While stocks continue to trade in a world of their own, just shy of all time highs, bond and currency markets are bracing for the Fed to announce a tapering of asset purchases as an initial step to eventually raising interest rates to contain inflation. Equity markets, on the other hand, are focusing on earnings growth and valuations. Meanwhile, mixed data on the global economic revival is further clouding the picture as the pandemic is making a comeback in parts of the world.

“We expect volatility in financial markets to remain high as not only the Fed, but other central banks around the world, extract liquidity to combat the rise in inflation,” Lon Erickson, portfolio manager at Thornburg Investment Management, wrote in a note. Despite Fed rhetoric, “we’ve started to see the market price in earlier policy rate moves, perhaps losing confidence in the ‘transitory’ nature of inflation.”

In Europe, the Stoxx Europe 600 Index slid 0.1% from a record reached on Monday, led lower by miners and travel companies. Spain’s IBEX and the UK FTSE 100 dropped 0.6%. DAX outperforms. BP dropped 2.8% in London even as the oil giant announced an additional $1.25 billion buyback. HelloFresh jumped 14%, the most this year, after the German meal-kit company raised its full-year outlook. Basic-materials stocks were the weakest of 20 sector indexes in Europe as falling iron ore and steel prices weigh on miners and steel producers. Here are some of the biggest European movers today:

  • HelloFresh shares surge as much as 16%, their best day since Dec. 2020, with analysts positive on the meal-kit maker’s guidance hike. Jefferies says that the company’s 3Q results included “little not to like.”
  • Demant shares rise as much as 6.5%, the most intraday since March 23, after the hearing-aid maker raised its earnings forecast and topped estimates.
  • Fresenius SE shares gain as much as 6.5% after reporting 3Q earnings slightly ahead of analyst estimates, with Jefferies saying the focus lies on the company’s cost-savings efforts and future plans for Kabi.
  • Fresenius Medical shares up as much as 4.5% after posting 3Q earnings. Company’s FY22 recovery is “key to share price development from here,” according to Jefferies.
  • Sinch shares drop as much as 17%, the most on record, after reporting 3Q results which showed organic growth slowing down, a trend Handelsbanken expects to worsen.
  • Standard Chartered shares fall as much as 9.5%, the most since March 2020, as the lender’s third-quarter margins disappointed amid suppressed Asia rates and analysts flagged weakness in its retail operations.
  • Flutter shares drop as much as 9% in London, the most intraday since March 2020, after the gaming company cut its profit outlook on unfavorable sporting results and a regulatory change in the Netherlands. Analysts expect ex-U.S. earnings consensus to fall.
  • Steel makers underperform, with Kloeckner -5.3%, ArcelorMittal -2.9%, ThyssenKrupp -2.5%, Salzgitter -2.5%

Asian stocks dipped, led by Chinese shares on concerns about the impact of measures to curb Covid-19 infections, while financials underperformed ahead of key central bank decisions this week. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index erased earlier gains of as much as 0.4% to fall 0.2% in afternoon trading. Blue-chip financial stocks including China Merchants Bank and Westpac Banking were among the biggest drags. Traders are focused on this week’s U.S. Federal Reserve meeting amid concerns about elevated inflation. Sentiment turned sour after authorities in Beijing halted classes at 18 schools amid Covid-19 resurgence. China’s benchmark CSI 300 Index fell 1%, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index reversed an earlier gain of 1.9% to close in negative territory. 

China’s CSI 300 Index falls by as much as 1.9% after Beijing’s suspension of classes across 18 schools heightened concerns over the impact of the recent Covid-19 outbreak. China Tourism Group Duty Free slumped as much as 9.8%, the worst performer in the benchmark and one of its biggest drags. The Shanghai Composite Index also extends decline to 1.9% while the ChiNext Index pares a 1.2% gain to trade little changed.

“Investors are worried that Beijing’s virus measures may cool down China’s economic activities and hamper its recovery,” said Steven Leung, executive director at UOB Kay Hian in Hong Kong. Asian stocks rose on Monday, a turnaround after a drop of 1.5% during last week, the worst such performance since early October. Shares have been whipsawed by ongoing concern over supply-chain constraints impacting industries such as technology and auto making. Investors are also parsing through earnings data, with more than half of the companies on MSCI’s Asia gauge having reported results.  “At this level, it can be said that investors are no longer pessimistic but are not yet hopeful either,” Olivier d’Assier, head of APAC applied research at Qontigo, wrote in a note. 

Japanese stocks fell, halting a two-day rally, as some investors adjusted positions after the market jumped yesterday.  The Topix index slid 0.6% to 2,031.67 at the 3 p.m. close in Tokyo, while the Nikkei 225 declined 0.4% to 29,520.90.  Mitsui & Co. contributed most to the Topix’s loss, decreasing 4%. Out of 2,181 shares in the index, 538 rose and 1,583 fell, while 60 were unchanged. Both the Topix and Nikkei 225 gained more than 2% on Monday after the ruling coalition secured an election victory that was better than many had expected. Japan’s stock market will be closed Wednesday for a national holiday.

Australian stocks slide, with the S&P/ASX 200 index falling 0.6% to close at 7,324.30, after the Reserve Bank of Australia abandoned a bond-yield target, following an acceleration in inflation that spurred traders to price in higher borrowing costs. Banks and miners slumped, while real estate and consumer discretionary stocks climbed. Goodman Group was the biggest gainer after the company raised its full-year guidance. Insurance Australia Group tumbled after the firm cut its reported insurance margin forecast for the full year.  In New Zealand, the S&P/NZX 50 index fell 0.3% to 12,992.50.

In rates, Treasuries were higher across both the front-end and belly of the curve, led by bull-steepening gains across European bonds with peripherals outperforming. Treasury yields were lower by 2bp-3bp across front-end of the curve, steepening 2s10s by that amount with 10-year little changed around 1.55%; German 10-year is lower by ~4bp, U.K. by ~1bp. Aussie front-end rallied during Asia session after the RBA abandoned its yield target but maintained its bond buying pace; euro-zone money markets subsequently pared the amount of ECB policy tightening that’s priced in.

European fixed income rallied with curves bull steepening. Belly of the German curve outperforms, trading ~2-3bps richer to gilts and USTs respectively. Peripheral spreads tighten; long-end Italy outperforms, narrowing ~6bps near 170bps.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index inched up and the greenback advanced versus all its Group-of-10 peers apart from the yen; Treasury yields fell by up to 3bps as the curve bull- steepened. The euro hovered around $1.16 while Italian bonds and bunds jumped, snapping three days of declines and tracking short-end Australian debt. The Australian dollar declined against all Group-of-10 peers and Australian short-end bond yields fell after the central bank dispensed with its bond-yield target and damped expectations of interest-rate hikes.  One-week volatility in the Australian dollar dropped a second day as spot pulls back from its 200-DMA of 0.7556 after the central bank’s policy decision. The pound fell for a third day, to nearly a three-week low, as investors weighed up the possibilities for the Bank of England’s policy meeting on Thursday. The yen strengthened ahead of a local holiday in Japan and amid souring market sentiment.

In commodities, crude futures hold a narrow range with WTI near $84 and Brent stalling near $85. Spot gold drift close to $1,795/oz. The base and ferrous metals complex remains under pressure: LME nickel and zinc drop ~1%, iron ore down over 6%.

Looking at the day ahead now, and the data highlights include the October manufacturing PMIs for the Euro Area, Germany, France and Italy. Central bank speakers will include the ECB’s Elderson and de Cos, whilst today’s earnings releases include Pfizer, T-Mobile, Estee Lauder and Amgen. Finally, there are US gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. Virginia is the more interesting race from a macro perspective: a big, diverse state that has bounced between Democratic and Republican candidates on the national stage. So it could provide the first read of American voter sentiment heading into next year’s mid-terms.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures little changed at 4,605.25
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.2% to 477.90
  • MXAP down 0.2% to 198.29
  • MXAPJ down 0.2% to 646.50
  • Nikkei down 0.4% to 29,520.90
  • Topix down 0.6% to 2,031.67
  • Hang Seng Index down 0.2% to 25,099.67
  • Shanghai Composite down 1.1% to 3,505.63
  • Sensex down 0.3% to 59,984.88
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.6% to 7,324.32
  • Kospi up 1.2% to 3,013.49
  • German 10Y yield little changed at -0.14%
  • Euro little changed at $1.1603
  • Brent Futures up 0.5% to $85.17/bbl
  • Gold spot down 0.1% to $1,791.04
  • U.S. Dollar Index little changed at 93.89

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • Federal Reserve policy makers are expected to announce this week that they will start scaling back their massive asset-purchase program amid greater concern over inflation, economists surveyed by Bloomberg said
  • President Emmanuel Macron backed away from his imminent threat to punish the U.K. for restricting the access of French fishing boats to British waters, saying he would give negotiations more time
  • The Reserve Bank of Australia’s dovish policy statement and downplaying of the inflation threat is likely to reignite a steepening of the yield curve from near the flattest in a year. The spread between three- and 10-year yields jumped as much as 10 basis points on Tuesday after central bank Governor Philip Lowe cooled expectations for any near-term interest-rate increase even though the RBA scrapped its yield- curve control policy

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

Asian equities traded mixed as upcoming risk events kept participants cautious and offset the momentum from the US, where stocks began the month on the front foot in a continuation of recent advances to lift the major indices to fresh record highs. Nonetheless, ASX 200 (-0.6%) was pressured by underperformance in the top-weighted financials sector and notable weakness in mining names, while quasi holiday conditions due to the Melbourne Cup in Australia’s second most populous state of Victoria and the crucial RBA policy announcement in which it maintained the Cash Rate Target at 0.10% but dropped the April 2024 government bond yield target and tweaked its guidance, further added to the cautious mood. Nikkei 225 (-0.4%) was lacklustre as it took a breather from the prior day’s surge after stalling just shy of the 29,600 level and with the index not helped by a slight reversal of the recent beneficial currency flows. Hang Seng (-0.3%) and Shanghai Comp. (-1.4%) were varied as the former initially atoned for yesterday’s losses led by strength in tech and biotech including Alibaba shares with its Singles Day sales event underway. In addition, Hong Kong participants were seemingly unfazed by the recent weaker than expected GDP for Q3 as the data showed it narrowly averted a technical recession, although the gains were later wiped out and the mainland suffered following another substantial liquidity drain and with Chinese commodity prices pressured including iron futures which hit limit down. Finally, 10yr JGBs were flat with price action muted despite the subdued mood for Tokyo stocks and with the presence of the BoJ in the market for over JPY 1tln of JGBs in mostly 1yr-5yr maturities, doing little to spur demand.

Top Asian News

  • Bank of Korea Minutes Show Majority Sees Need for Rate Hike
  • China’s Gas Prices Are Surging Just as Coal Market Cools Off
  • China Shares Fall as Shut Schools Spark Concern on Virus Curbs
  • SMBC Nikko Is Working With Securities Watchdog on Investigation

Bourses in Europe have now adopted more of a mixed picture (Euro Stoxx 50 +0.1%; Stoxx 600 -0.2%) Stoxx 600 following the lacklustre cash open and downbeat APAC handover. US equity futures meanwhile are somewhat mixed with the RTY (+0.2%) narrowly outperforming the ES (-0.1%), YM (Unch), and NQ (-0.2%) – with the latter also seeing some pressure from Tesla (-6.0% pre-market) after CEO Musk said no deal was signed yet with Hertz and that a deal would have zero impact on Tesla’s economics. Back to Europe, a divergence is evident with the DAX 40 (+0.4%) outpacing amid post-earnings gains from HelloFresh (+14%), Fresenius SE (+4.6%) and Fresenius Medical Care (+2.0%). The FTSE 100 (-0.5%) meanwhile lags with the Dec futures and cash both under 7,250 – with the index pressured by heft losses in some of its heaviest sectors. Basic resources sit at the foot of the bunch due to softer base metal prices across the board, which saw Dalian iron ore futures hit limit down at least twice in the overnight session. Travel & Leisure closely follows as sector heavyweight Flutter Entertainment (~23% weighting) slipped after cutting guidance. Oil & Gas and Banks closely follow due to the recent declines in crude (and BP post-earnings) and yields respectively. On the flip side, some of the more defensive sectors stand at the top of the leader board with Healthcare and Food & Beverages the current winners. In terms of other individual movers, THG (-6.1%) resides near the bottom of the Stoxx 600 second-largest shareholder BlackRock (9.5% stake) is reportedly planning to sell 55mln shares equating to around 4% of its holding. It’s also worth noting Apple (-0.1% pre-market) has reportedly reduced iPad production to feed chips to the iPhone 13, according to Nikkei sources; iPad production was reportedly -50% from Apple’s original plans, sources added. In terms of broad equity commentary, Credit Suisse remains overweight value in Europe, whilst raising US small caps to overnight and reducing the UK to underweight. Looking at the rationale, CS notes that European value tend to outperform while inflation expectations or Bund yields rise. US small caps meanwhile have underperformed almost all macro drivers, whilst earnings momentum takes a turn for the better. Finally, CS argues UK small caps are much more cyclical than large caps and could face further tailwinds from UK’s macro landscape and with some tightening potentially on the table this week.

Top European News

  • BP Grows Buyback as Profit Rises on Higher Prices, Trading
  • Ferrexpo Drops as Credit Suisse Downgrades on Lower Pricing
  • OPEC+ Gets a Warning From Japan Before Key Supply Meeting
  • THG Extends Decline as Key Shareholder BlackRock Reduces Stake

In FX, the Aussie has reversed even more sharply from its recent core inflation and yield induced highs in wake of the RBA policy meeting overnight and confirmation of the moves/tweaks most were expecting. To recap, YCT was officially withdrawn after the Bank allowed the 3 year target rate to soar through the 0.1% ceiling and guidance on rates being held at the same level until 2024, at the earliest, was also withdrawn and replaced by a more flexible or conditional timeframe when inflation is sustainably in the 2-3% remit range. However, Governor Lowe retained a decidedly dovish tone in the aftermath, pushing back against more aggressive market pricing for tightening and stressing that it is entirely plausible that the first increase in the Cash Rate will not be before the maturity of the current April 2024 target bond, though it is also plausible that a hike could be appropriate in 2023 and there is genuine uncertainty as to the timing of future adjustments in the Cash Rate. Aud/Usd is now closer to 0.7450 than 0.7550 and the Aud/Nzd cross nearer 1.0400 than the round number above with added weight applied by weakness in copper and iron ore prices especially (latter hit limit down on China’s Dallian exchange). Meanwhile, the Kiwi also felt some contagion after a drop in NZ building consents and as attention turns to the Q3 HLFS report, with Nzd/Usd eyeing 0.7150 having got to within pips of 0.7200 only yesterday.

  • EUR/DXY – Technical forces seem to be having an influence on direction in Eur/Usd amidst somewhat mixed Eurozone manufacturing PMIs as the headline pair topped out precisely or pretty much bang on a 50% retracement of the reversal from 1.1692 to 1.1535 at 1.1613 and subsequently probed the 21 DMA that comes in at 1.1598 today. Moreover, the Euro appears reliant on hefty option expiry interest for support given 1.9 bn rolling off at 1.1585 if it cannot reclaim 1.1600+ status, as the Dollar regroups and trades firmer against most majors, bar the Yen. Indeed, in stark contrast to Monday, the index has bounced off a marginally deeper sub-94.000 low between tight 93.818-985 confines, albeit in cautious, choppy pre-FOMC mood.
  • CHF/CAD/GBP – No traction for the Franc via firmer than forecast Swiss CPI or a faster pace of consumption, while the Loonie is on the defensive ahead of Canadian building permits and Sterling is still on a softer footing awaiting the BoE on Thursday alongside what could be a make or break meeting in France where UK Brexit Minister Frost is due to tackle the fishing dispute face-to-face with Secretary of State for European Affairs Beaune. Usd/Chf is straddling 0.9100, Usd/Cad is hovering around 1.2400, Cable pivots 1.3650 and Eur/Gbp is probing 0.8500.
  • JPY – As noted above, the Yen is bucking the broad G10 trend with gains vs the Greenback amidst appreciably softer US Treasury and global bond yields, as Usd/Jpy retreats from 114.00+ peaks to test support circa 113.50.

In commodities, WTI and Brent front-month futures are moving sideways ahead of the OPEC+ meeting on Thursday, whereby expectations are skewed towards an unwind of current curbs by 400k BPD despite outside pressure for the group to further open the taps. Ministers, including de-facto heads Russia and Saudi, have been vocal in their support towards a maintained pace of production hikes. There have also been reports of Angola and Nigeria struggling to keep up with the output hikes, which may further dissuade the producer to further ramp up output. The morning also saw macro commentary from BP, whereby the CFO suggested global oil demand has returned to levels above 100mln BPD. The Co. expects oil prices to be supported by continued inventory draw-down, with the potential for additional demand from gas to oil switching. OPEC+ decision making on production levels continues to be a key factor in oil prices and market rebalancing. Gas markets were very strong in the quarter and BP expect the market to remain tight during the period of peak winter demand. In the fourth quarter industry refining margins are expected to be lower compared to the third quarter driven by seasonal demand. WTI Dec trades on either side of USD 84/bbl and Brent on either side of USD 85/bbl. Elsewhere, spot gold and silver are relatively flat with the former in close proximity to its 200 DMA (1,790/oz), 100 DMA (1,785/oz), 50 DMA (1,780/oz) and 21 DMA (1,778/oz). Over to base metals, Dalian iron ore futures were in focus overnight after prices hit limit down at least twice and nearly hit 1yr lows amid high supply and lower demand, with the latter namely a function of China cutting steel output forecasts. LME copper meanwhile has clambered off worst levels (USD 9,430/t) but remains just under USD 9,500/t as prices track sentiment.

US Event Calendar

  • Oct. Wards Total Vehicle Sales, est. 12.5mm, prior 12.2mm

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

The RBA press conference is still going onas we type this but the key outcome has been that they’ve abandoned the 0.1% target for the April 2024 bond. However they seem to be making it clear in the presser that their expectation is only that rate hikes might creep into 2023 rather than 2024 previously. The governor has said that market expectations of hikes in 2022 are “a complete overreaction to recent inflation data”. So they are trying to pull back the market expectations that ran away from them last week. The reality is that they’ll now be hostage to the data. They don’t expect inflation to be a big problem going forward but time will tell. Yield moves have been relatively subdued but are generally lower with a small steepening seen. 2y (-0.2bps), 3y (-4.5bps) and 5y (-3.3bps) are falling but with the 10y (+0.3bps) steadier.

Ahead of the RBA, risk assets got the month off to a strong start as investors awaited tomorrow’s all-important Federal Reserve meeting conclusion. However there was little sign of caution in equities as a range of global indices advanced to all-time records yesterday, including the S&P 500 (+0.18%), the NASDAQ (+0.63%), the STOXX 600 (+0.71%), and the MSCI World Index (+0.50%). Energy (+1.59%) and consumer discretionary (+1.46%) were the clear outperformers in the S&P, with Tesla (+8.49%) doing a lot of the work of boosting the latter sector. While it’s a busy week for earnings, only 2 S&P companies reported during trading hours yesterday, so it didn’t materially drive sentiment. 11 more companies reported after hours, with 7 beating earnings estimates. Elsewhere, the Dow Jones actually crossed the 36,000 mark in trading for the first time. Readers of a certain age may remember an infamous book published in 1999 called “Dow 36,000” during the dot com bubble, which predicted the Dow would more than triple over the next 3-5 years to that level. In reality, even the half way mark of 18k wasn’t reached until late-2014, and of course it took 22 years to get to yesterday’s 36k milestone. So a good case study of the heady optimism many had back then.

We’ll see if yesterday’s milestones are the first step on the path to Dow 100k, but one asset inching its way to $100 in oil, with yesterday seeing a fresh recovery in many commodity prices after their declines last week. Both WTI (+0.57%) and Brent crude (+0.39%) posted gains, with copper (+0.58%) also seeing a modest advance. Agricultural prices set fresh records, with wheat prices (+3.17%) climbing above $8/bushel in intraday trading for the first time since 2012.

It may be a pretty busy macro week with the Fed, BoE and the US jobs report, but the OPEC+ meeting on output this Thursday could also be a vital one for the global economy in light of the resurgence in energy prices lately. We’ve already heard some frustration at the group from a number of countries, with President Biden saying this Sunday at the G20 that “I do think that the idea that Russia and Saudi Arabia and other major producers are not gonna pump more oil so people can have gasoline to get to and from work for example, is … not right”. So one to keep an eye on, with potentially big implications for inflation and hence central banks.

Staying on an inflation theme, investors got a further glimpse of ongoing supply chain issues from the ISM manufacturing print as well yesterday. The overall reading for October actually came in slightly above expectations at 60.8 (vs. 60.5 expected), but the prices paid order similarly rose to 85.7 (vs. 82.0 expected) in its second successive monthly increase. Bear in mind it’s been above the 80 mark for all but one month so far this year, and there were further signs of supply-chain issues from the supplier delivery time measure, which hit a 5-month high of 75.6.

With markets attuned to inflation and the potential for plenty of central bank action this week, sovereign bonds came under further pressure yesterday on both sides of the Atlantic, even if they finished well off the yield highs. Yields on 10yr Treasuries ended the session up +0.7 bps to 1.56%, which comes as markets are almost pricing an initial full hike from the Fed by the time of their June 2022 meeting. However we were off the day’s high of 1.60%. Meanwhile in Europe, yields on 10yr bunds (+0.4 bps), OATs (+0.3 bps) and gilts (+2.8 bps) moved higher as well, but interestingly we also saw peripheral sovereign bond spreads closing in on their highest levels for some time. Indeed by the close of trade yesterday, the gap between Italian (+4.4 bps) and Spanish (+2.2 bps) 10yr yields over bunds had widened to their biggest level in almost a year. Meanwhile, 10yr breakevens widened +4.5 bps in the UK and +2.0 bps in Germany. US breakevens were the outlier, narrowing -7.5 bps to 2.51% and now -18.0 bps below the highs reached just a week ago.

In Asia, the Nikkei 225 (-0.56%) and the Shanghai Composite (-0.62%) are trading lower, while the Hang Seng (+0.74%) and the KOSPI (+1.36%) are edging higher. Some of the news weighing on Chinese stocks are surging gas prices, which reached a record high today. Elsewhere, the S&P 500 futures (-0.22%) is down this morning and the 10y US Treasury is at 1.55% (-0.9bps).

Heads of state gave their opening salvos at COP26 yesterday. The biggest commitment came from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who said the world’s third-biggest emitter will have zero net pollution by 2070, while also making more near-term commitments to increase reliance on non-fossil fuel energy sources.

Looking at yesterday’s other data, German retail sales unexpectedly fell by -2.5% in September (vs. +0.4% expected). However, the final UK manufacturing PMI for October was revised up a tenth from the flash reading to 57.8. Over in the US though, there was a downward revision to 58.4 (vs. flash 59.2).

To the day ahead now, and the data highlights include the October manufacturing PMIs for the Euro Area, Germany, France and Italy. Central bank speakers will include the ECB’s Elderson and de Cos, whilst today’s earnings releases include Pfizer, T-Mobile, Estee Lauder and Amgen. Finally, there are US gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. Virginia is the more interesting race from a macro perspective: a big, diverse state that has bounced between Democratic and Republican candidates on the national stage. So it could provide the first read of American voter sentiment heading into next year’s mid-terms.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 11/02/2021 – 07:52

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3byFS3q Tyler Durden

Virginia Governor Race Is an Education Policy Wake-Up Call That Democrats (and the Media) Won’t Heed


McAuliffe

A week before today’s election, his gubernatorial fortunes free-falling in the polls, former governor and longtime Clinton-world heavyweight Terry McAuliffe made the odd intimation that racism is an effective statewide electoral strategy in Virginia.

“In the final week of this race, Glenn Youngkin has doubled down on the same divisive culture wars that have fueled his campaign from the very beginning,” McAuliffe said in a statement, after his Republican opponent had run an advertisement in which a mother complained about McAuliffe’s nonresponsiveness to her objecting to the explicit sexual material of an unnamed novel (Toni Morrison’s Beloved) that had been assigned to her high school senior son. “Youngkin’s closing message of book banning and silencing esteemed Black authors is a racist dog whistle designed to gin up support from the most extreme elements of his party—mainly his top endorser and surrogate, Donald Trump.”

Like a magic eight-ball, there are many different ways to look at McAuliffe’s statement, most of them surrealist at best. Trump is a “surrogate,” even though Youngkin doesn’t want to be anywhere near him? Ginning up extreme, racist, Trumpy support is a plausible strategy in a state that Joe Biden won by 10 percentage points, Hillary Clinton won by five, and Barack Obama took twice? Allowing individual parents to opt out of certain assigned books is the same as banning them and silencing their authors?

Yet there is indeed something “fueling” the rise of the relatively unknown, younger–Mitt Romneyesque Youngkin. Democrats in Democratic-run jurisdictions tend to call this factor “divisive culture war,” but the more accurate term may be “people passionately (if sloppily) criticizing Democratic governance of schools.” Education policy, that largest and most local of government issues, has shot to the top of voter concerns in Virginia, and the people most keyed up about it are the most likely to prefer Youngkin.

It’s the kind of political phenomenon in a purple state like Virginia that should be cause for examination and perhaps even self-reflection among Democrats, educators, and left-leaning journalists. Virginia, after all, had the seventh most closed K-12 system during the coronavirus-marred 2020–21 school year, clustered on the restrictive end of the spectrum with blue states like California, Oregon, and Maryland, while the open-school states were predominantly Republican.

Instead, far too many have followed McAuliffe’s lead in pinning Youngkin’s unprojected rise on a latent right-wing racism that had been so unsuccessful this century until now. School closures, distance learning, masking policies, quarantine guidelines, learning loss, the shuttering of Gifted and Talented programs—all get frequently collapsed into the reductionist notion that opposition to “critical race theory” overrides all, and that there’s some kind of sleeper-cell potency in agitating against Toni Morrison.

“The operative word is not critical, it’s not theory, it’s race,” argued political science professor and go-to conventional wisdom–purveyor Larry Sabato Monday on MSNBC. “That is what matters, and that’s why it sticks. There’s a lot of—we can call it ‘white backlash,’ ‘white resistance’; whatever you want to call it, it has to do with race….This is a post-factual era. It doesn’t matter that it isn’t taught in Virginia schools. It’s this generalized attitude that whites are being put upon, and we’ve got to do something about it. ‘We,’ being white voters.”

Washington Post columnist Paul Waldman maintained that what Youngkin did wasn’t even a racist dog whistle, because “There are no more dog whistles in American politics.” Instead, it’s about “base mobilization” rather than “persuading voters in the middle.” This, again, in a state that hasn’t voted GOP for president in 17 years.

If I can, in a spirit of charity, encourage Democrats to tattoo one headline onto their forearms, as they attempt to recalibrate their political strategy in the wake of either Youngkin’s victory or McAuliffe’s near miss, it would be this, from Fox News’s Juan Williams, writing Monday in The Hill: “‘Parents’ rights’ is code for white race politics.” If you tell parents that attempting to exert influence on their kids’ school policies is just some kind of “Let’s Go Brandon” wink-nudge for hating on the dark-skinned, those parents will rightly tell you to go fuck yourself. Such choices do not successful political strategies make.

Calling people racist can work in the short term—to shut critics up, guilt people into accepting policy changes they don’t agree with, even drive out the demographically/ideologically undesirable. But for those who find themselves unfairly on the receiving end of, or even adjacent to, our political culture’s remarkably breezy standards for deploying the scarlet R, the results can be radicalizing. The potency of shame wanes with its overuse, and people no longer afraid of speaking are going to say many things you do not want to hear.

Those things include batshit conspiratorial anti-Semitic rants, to be sure, and also the type of atavistic class/race anxieties that have all too often warped education policy in a way that has benefited majority populations at the expense of minorities. This is a weird and ideologically diverse country, with some still un-dismantled legacies of segregationist policies, at a time of pandemic stress, negative polarization, and low public trust. The open-mic segments of public meetings weren’t exactly an intellectual or artistic triumph before any of that.

But here are the power relations that I suspect (in my far-off bubble) have more to do with Youngkin support than even the I-Hate-Toni-Morrison Club: Monday night, at one of his last preelection rallies, McAuliffe featured as a speaker American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, one of the single most villainous figures in American public life these past 19 months.

When history books are written about why U.S. K-12 schools were more closed than those of any other rich country, Weingarten will be on the cover. When two historians took to the Washington Post op-ed page to provide support for McAuliffe’s infamous debate gaffe (“I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach kids“) with a headline nearly as cringeworthy (“Parents claim they have the right to shape their kids’ school curriculum. They don’t“), it was Weingarten out there calling it a “Great piece.”

This is the type of workaday condescension and pandemic-era power flex that has a subset of parents—especially in the blue states where teachers unions hold sway—apoplectic. In my neck of the woods, it isn’t even always the contents of the “equity“-based education policies themselves that get the arteries constricted; it’s the monomaniacal focus on those even in the face of much more immediate challenges related to COVID-19.

The straight-man refrain of a recent Saturday Night Live sketch satirizing lunatic school board meetings was that the officials in question just wanted to keep things focused on COVID-related policy, while the vox pop rabble ranted about various non-sequiturs (most hilariously, vaping and “anal”). But the reality over most of these past 19 months has been something closer to the inverse: Three San Francisco Unified School District board members face recall election not because they simply want to teach American racial history, warts and all, but because the district wanted to change the allegedly problematic names of 44 schools while students were still barred from the schoolhouse doors.

Public schools are one of the last allegedly neutral playing fields in American civic life, at a time when partisans do not care much for neutrality. It is inevitable that their governance will be hotly contested, with hyperbolic overreach on all sides. But if McAuliffe loses Tuesday, and Democrats retreat to a blame-racists storyline, this very institution that they overwhelmingly influence in 2021 will teeter that much closer toward collapse. There’s a lesson to be learned there.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3mBj7lo
via IFTTT

Tesla Tumbles After Musk Casually Tweets “No Contract” Signed On Hertz Deal

Tesla Tumbles After Musk Casually Tweets “No Contract” Signed On Hertz Deal

Tesla shares are down about 5% in pre-market trading after Elon Musk Tweeted late Monday night that the company’s deal with Hertz – widely seen as the catalyst (other than call options) for moving the stock higher over the last week – still hadn’t been formalized in a contract.

Once again, it looks to be a case of Elon Musk’s Tweets disclosing “relatively material” information (especially given Tesla’s stock price move over the last week which gained almost half a trillion dollar in 3 weeks!) that the market otherwise wouldn’t have had access to.

Days after the company tacked on hundreds of billions of dollars in “value” following the announcement that Hertz would buy 100,000 Teslas, Musk nonchalantly tweeted in response to a chart of his company’s stock: “If any of this is based on Hertz, I’d like to emphasize that no contract has been signed yet.”

“Tesla has far more demand than production, therefore we will only sell cars to Hertz for the same margin as to consumers,” Musk wrote.

Recall, it has now been about 7 days since Tesla rocketed to new highs on the back of the Hertz announcement. 

Bloomberg reported at the time that the order marked the “single-largest purchase ever for electric vehicles” and will equate to about $4.2 billion in revenue for Tesla. 

It was also reported that the order would be delivered over the next 14 months and Model 3 vehicles would be available to rent at most Hertz locations starting in November. 

Hertz was said to be building its own charging infrastructure, in addition to allowing customers to have access to Tesla’s Supercharger network. 

And Wedbush’s Dan Ives was out with the pom-poms the day after the Hertz report, writing on October 26: “The Hertz deal we believe will be viewed as a tipping point for the EV industry as this 100k Model 3′s/$4 billion+ deal for Tesla speaks to more mainstream adoption for EVs as today only 2% of autos in the US are EV driven compared to 10%+ in China with rapid growth on the horizon. We believe this is the biggest transformation to the auto industry since the 1950′s with more consumers heading down the EV path over the coming years.”

We wonder if he knew there was no contract signed at the time. But we digress…

Adding to Tesla’s misery on Tuesday, it was also announced that the company would be recalling over 11,000 vehicles sold since 2017 due to a communication error that “may cause a false forward-collision warning”, according to Reuters.

The recall was “prompted after a software update on Oct. 23 to vehicles in its limited early access Full-Self Driving (Beta) population,” the report says.

It marks the second such recall brought to the attention of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the last week. The company also recalled almost 2,800 vehicles for suspension that could increase the risk of crash, we reported on October 29. 

And so, Tesla slumps pre-market. That is, in all likelihood, at least until the options market opens. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 11/02/2021 – 07:13

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3GIVRKh Tyler Durden

Virginia Governor Race Is an Education Policy Wake-Up Call That Democrats (and the Media) Won’t Heed


McAuliffe

A week before today’s election, his gubernatorial fortunes free-falling in the polls, former governor and longtime Clinton-world heavyweight Terry McAuliffe made the odd intimation that racism is an effective statewide electoral strategy in Virginia.

“In the final week of this race, Glenn Youngkin has doubled down on the same divisive culture wars that have fueled his campaign from the very beginning,” McAuliffe said in a statement, after his Republican opponent had run an advertisement in which a mother complained about McAuliffe’s nonresponsiveness to her objecting to the explicit sexual material of an unnamed novel (Toni Morrison’s Beloved) that had been assigned to her high school senior son. “Youngkin’s closing message of book banning and silencing esteemed Black authors is a racist dog whistle designed to gin up support from the most extreme elements of his party—mainly his top endorser and surrogate, Donald Trump.”

Like a magic eight-ball, there are many different ways to look at McAuliffe’s statement, most of them surrealist at best. Trump is a “surrogate,” even though Youngkin doesn’t want to be anywhere near him? Ginning up extreme, racist, Trumpy support is a plausible strategy in a state that Joe Biden won by 10 percentage points, Hillary Clinton won by five, and Barack Obama took twice? Allowing individual parents to opt out of certain assigned books is the same as banning them and silencing their authors?

Yet there is indeed something “fueling” the rise of the relatively unknown, younger–Mitt Romneyesque Youngkin. Democrats in Democratic-run jurisdictions tend to call this factor “divisive culture war,” but the more accurate term may be “people passionately (if sloppily) criticizing Democratic governance of schools.” Education policy, that largest and most local of government issues, has shot to the top of voter concerns in Virginia, and the people most keyed up about it are the most likely to prefer Youngkin.

It’s the kind of political phenomenon in a purple state like Virginia that should be cause for examination and perhaps even self-reflection among Democrats, educators, and left-leaning journalists. Virginia, after all, had the seventh most closed K-12 system during the coronavirus-marred 2020–21 school year, clustered on the restrictive end of the spectrum with blue states like California, Oregon, and Maryland, while the open-school states were predominantly Republican.

Instead, far too many have followed McAuliffe’s lead in pinning Youngkin’s unprojected rise on a latent right-wing racism that had been so unsuccessful this century until now. School closures, distance learning, masking policies, quarantine guidelines, learning loss, the shuttering of Gifted and Talented programs—all get frequently collapsed into the reductionist notion that opposition to “critical race theory” overrides all, and that there’s some kind of sleeper-cell potency in agitating against Toni Morrison.

“The operative word is not critical, it’s not theory, it’s race,” argued political science professor and go-to conventional wisdom–purveyor Larry Sabato Monday on MSNBC. “That is what matters, and that’s why it sticks. There’s a lot of—we can call it ‘white backlash,’ ‘white resistance’; whatever you want to call it, it has to do with race….This is a post-factual era. It doesn’t matter that it isn’t taught in Virginia schools. It’s this generalized attitude that whites are being put upon, and we’ve got to do something about it. ‘We,’ being white voters.”

Washington Post columnist Paul Waldman maintained that what Youngkin did wasn’t even a racist dog whistle, because “There are no more dog whistles in American politics.” Instead, it’s about “base mobilization” rather than “persuading voters in the middle.” This, again, in a state that hasn’t voted GOP for president in 17 years.

If I can, in a spirit of charity, encourage Democrats to tattoo one headline onto their forearms, as they attempt to recalibrate their political strategy in the wake of either Youngkin’s victory or McAuliffe’s near miss, it would be this, from Fox News’s Juan Williams, writing Monday in The Hill: “‘Parents’ rights’ is code for white race politics.” If you tell parents that attempting to exert influence on their kids’ school policies is just some kind of “Let’s Go Brandon” wink-nudge for hating on the dark-skinned, those parents will rightly tell you to go fuck yourself. Such choices do not successful political strategies make.

Calling people racist can work in the short term—to shut critics up, guilt people into accepting policy changes they don’t agree with, even drive out the demographically/ideologically undesirable. But for those who find themselves unfairly on the receiving end of, or even adjacent to, our political culture’s remarkably breezy standards for deploying the scarlet R, the results can be radicalizing. The potency of shame wanes with its overuse, and people no longer afraid of speaking are going to say many things you do not want to hear.

Those things include batshit conspiratorial anti-Semitic rants, to be sure, and also the type of atavistic class/race anxieties that have all too often warped education policy in a way that has benefited majority populations at the expense of minorities. This is a weird and ideologically diverse country, with some still un-dismantled legacies of segregationist policies, at a time of pandemic stress, negative polarization, and low public trust. The open-mic segments of public meetings weren’t exactly an intellectual or artistic triumph before any of that.

But here are the power relations that I suspect (in my far-off bubble) have more to do with Youngkin support than even the I-Hate-Toni-Morrison Club: Monday night, at one of his last preelection rallies, McAuliffe featured as a speaker American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, one of the single most villainous figures in American public life these past 19 months.

When history books are written about why U.S. K-12 schools were more closed than those of any other rich country, Weingarten will be on the cover. When two historians took to the Washington Post op-ed page to provide support for McAuliffe’s infamous debate gaffe (“I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach kids“) with a headline nearly as cringeworthy (“Parents claim they have the right to shape their kids’ school curriculum. They don’t“), it was Weingarten out there calling it a “Great piece.”

This is the type of workaday condescension and pandemic-era power flex that has a subset of parents—especially in the blue states where teachers unions hold sway—apoplectic. In my neck of the woods, it isn’t even always the contents of the “equity“-based education policies themselves that get the arteries constricted; it’s the monomaniacal focus on those even in the face of much more immediate challenges related to COVID-19.

The straight-man refrain of a recent Saturday Night Live sketch satirizing lunatic school board meetings was that the officials in question just wanted to keep things focused on COVID-related policy, while the vox pop rabble ranted about various non-sequiturs (most hilariously, vaping and “anal”). But the reality over most of these past 19 months has been something closer to the inverse: Three San Francisco Unified School District board members face recall election not because they simply want to teach American racial history, warts and all, but because the district wanted to change the allegedly problematic names of 44 schools while students were still barred from the schoolhouse doors.

Public schools are one of the last allegedly neutral playing fields in American civic life, at a time when partisans do not care much for neutrality. It is inevitable that their governance will be hotly contested, with hyperbolic overreach on all sides. But if McAuliffe loses Tuesday, and Democrats retreat to a blame-racists storyline, this very institution that they overwhelmingly influence in 2021 will teeter that much closer toward collapse. There’s a lesson to be learned there.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3mBj7lo
via IFTTT

We Could Be Staring Down The Barrel of A Catastrophic NASDAQ Crash And Not Even Know It

We Could Be Staring Down The Barrel of A Catastrophic NASDAQ Crash And Not Even Know It

Submitted by Quoth the Raven at QTR’s Fringe Finance

It would certainly take a special confluence of factors for us to be staring down the barrel of a an unprecedented crash in tech stocks without noticing it’s coming. But I’m starting to entertain the idea that that is exactly where we are, we may not know how much pain we are truly in for – and we might not fathom how quickly it could come on and surprise us. While I’ve already talked about the folly of money printing and how it could destroy the U.S., its residual effects in markets are also worth paying close attention to. 

For a little while now my friend on Twitter @rosemontseneca has been quietly pontificating that we are living 1999 all over again, we just don’t notice it yet. I’m starting to seriously agree with him and I have been thinking to myself over the past week: “Why aren’t other people making this comparison yet? Stocks are extremely overvalued. What’s ‘different this time’?”

Indeed, I believe the next crash is going to come as a breakneck-style surprise. If I had a chance to publish this piece before Halloween, I was going to make the analogy of somebody sneaking in the back door of the house and waiting around the corner in the kitchen to hack us to death when we went to make our “stoned-in-our-underwear at 2AM” bologna sandwich. But instead I wound up going with the gun analogy for the title because I was too lazy to get this article out in the month of October.

But analogies aside, the point is still the same: the next big market plunge could be any day now, and will likely be led by tech. Let me explain my reasoning.

A couple of things need to happen in order for a major crash to be around the corner without us knowing it, in my opinion. The first thing that needs to happen is that the bubble needs to be more dangerous than prior crashes – nobody would panic at the nominal size of the 1999 bubble anymore and it would hardly be enough to scare today’s investors. They’d probably look at it as a “dip” to buy. The second thing that needs to happen is we need to be flying totally blind and distracted to the market’s insane valuation somehow. This is where the “surprise” factor – also known as the “oh shit” moment – comes in. The third thing that needs to happen is a catalyst that will shock and wake everybody up all at once.

So let’s talk about why this bubble could be more dangerous than previous ones. The NASDAQ is literally the 1999 tech bubble on steroids. It’s not going to come as any surprise to my readers that I want to point out that a significant amount of call buying that was done purposely back in 2020 is what sets us apart from 1999’s market.

People are weaponizing options, something that wasn’t being done in 1999. In 1999, it was just plain hysteria that drove stocks higher. Between March 2020 and now, there have been multiple documented examples – Goldman Sachs, Softbank, Bill Hwang, whatever the fuck is going on in Tesla – that the NASDAQ may not have a real bid underneath it and may be may have started its pre-hysteria run at a much higher “foundational” level thanks to planned gamma squeezes.

This was from September 2020, on the Financial Times:

SoftBank is the “Nasdaq whale” that has bought billions of dollars’ worth of US equity derivatives in a series of trades that stoked the fevered rally in big tech stocks before a sharp pullback on Thursday and Friday, according to people familiar with the matter.

The Japanese conglomerate had been snapping up options in tech stocks during the past month in huge amounts, fuelling the largest ever trading volumes in contracts linked to individual companies, these people said. One banker described it as a “dangerous” bet.

This was also from September 2020, on Zerohedge:

According to IFR Reuters, the investment bank made about $100 million trading Tesla alone over the last several months. The bank was engaged in trades that included “stock options, providing financing secured against Tesla’s shares, and buying and selling its convertible bonds,” according to Bloomberg.

This means that when we start to fall, a crash could wind up running into an air pocket where bids normally would be and accelerate quicker. It also means that we may have distorted the market for hire far quicker than any other time in history.

And, of course, there were massive option bets in highly shorted names like GSX and IQ that Bill Hwang owned, before his fund, Archegos, blew up.

The weaponization of options helped the NASDAQ double in nearly 18 months. This is not normal for an individual equity, let alone an index.

But if this run higher was 1999 all over again, many would argue that we would notice it. We would learn from our mistakes, right?

Of course, that statement is great for a laugh: we never learn from our mistakes.

So how could we not notice things getting out of control? Has there been anything that has distracted us lately?

Photo: NBC

Between the 2020 election, dealing with the pandemic and then investing the time necessary to sift through the mainstream media news to try and figure out which 5% of the narrative they are telling us is actually true, it’s no surprise we literally haven’t been able to pull our collective heads out of our asses.

Put simply: we really haven’t had time to give a shit about markets.

Do you remember years ago, when markets were about 50% lower than where they are now and Janet Yellen and Carl Icahn were sounding alarm bells? Yellen said that assets appeared overvalued while Fed Chair and Icahn put a video up on his website warning about valuations. That seems like ancient history now. And hey: if they thought the markets were grossly overvalued then, what do they think now?

That silence you hear is the sound of nobody speaking up anymore. It’s a combination of groupthink buy-in, overestimating the Fed’s grip on things and people being too distraction trying to figure out how we’re gonna deal with our new lives in the age of a pandemic.

Additionally, and especially when it comes to tech stocks, bullshit begets more bullshit. What I mean by this is that when asset managers are successful thanks to the tech stock market being in an uber-bubble, they need to come up with excuses for why they’re actually outperforming markets, even if they don’t have a clue how they’re doing it. Tune into CNBC on any given day and you’ll see this: it’s why we hear asset managers like Cathie Wood alluding to things like valuations not mattering anymore. This type of toxic bilge then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and leads more sheep to the slaughter…I mean NASDAQ.

Finally, we need a catalyst that will set the market off lower. The easy pick for catalyst is rates and tapering. The “outside” picks are things like crypto crashing or other catalysts we may not have even fathomed yet (think Evergrande, but with another larger, unexpected company). My readers know that I have talked extensively about crypto potentially becoming a pin that picks the bubble. You can listen to more of my argument about that here.

On top of my “fringe” theses, we also have high profile asset managers like Bill Ackman coming out and begging the Fed to taper and raise rates.

Inflation is starting to get to a point where it is becoming a major political issue and the rest of the country is starting to notice how quickly prices are rising. This is doing things like pulling demand forward, as consumers anticipate continued price hikes and supply chain issues.

These types of unnatural behaviors by the consumer, coupled with Wall Street realizing that a lack of action from the Fed could be catastrophic, could wind up being a perfect storm that catalyzes a deleveraging from growth stocks. If rates do begin to rise – even slightly – it will be a tiny incentive for a few investors to get out of the market and seek yield elsewhere. Even the slightest of rate moves and the slightest of tech market selling could catalyze massive aftershocks in equity markets – especially if it catches people bit by surprise and the aforementioned bid under tech stocks rests on the air pocket that I think it does.

The point of the matter is we could be closer to a tech stock crash than we think.

Finally, many people would probably hypothesize that we would never have two crashes in such a short period of time. After all, we just “got over” a crash in March 2020; ergo, people expect the bull market to go on for decades now. The average investor has forgotten that recessions and crashes don’t care when the last bull market was and don’t care when the last bear market was. We are fooling ourselves with cognitive dissonance when we tell ourselves that another crash isn’t possible because one just happened. An easy way to accept this fact is to realize we never truly “recovered” from the post-Covid rally – we simply papered over the problem.

And while this thesis of mine is relatively simple I ask you to consider these three things when you take a step back and try to objectively examine whether a crash could take place any day now:

  1. Is this tech bubble larger and more dangerous than 1999?

  2. Have we been distracted to the point where we may not have noticed how deep the water is that we are treading in?

  3. Is there any lack of potential catalysts on the horizon for a market crash?

My answers to these questions point me right back to my title: we really could be staring down the barrel of the next crash.

* * *

I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments on my blog: Leave a comment

You can access this full article and all my archives by subscribing. Zerohedge readers get 10% off an annual subscription to my blog by using this special link here.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 11/02/2021 – 06:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3bOjC5L Tyler Durden

The Uses and Disadvantages of Soviet History for Life


intro

“Welp, this is all wrong now.” The collapse of the Soviet Union is marked for me by a single flickering recollection from sixth-grade homeroom. My classroom had one of those world maps that pulls down like a roller shade, and in the winter of 1991 my teacher seemed vaguely put out that it would now have to be replaced.

In retrospect, I realized his weariness was less about geopolitics and more about the difficulty of requisitioning new teaching aids in the public school system. But at the time it felt appropriately anticlimactic.

I was not raised on duck-and-cover nuclear drills, nor was I terribly aware of the Cold War in my daily life, despite growing up inside the D.C. Beltway. The final days of the Soviet Union were well underway before I had enough brain cells to process the real implications. Red Dawn, with its anti-communist guerrilla kids in letter jackets, was already a kitschy period piece when I saw it for the first time. I was vaguely aware that the Doomsday Clock was at a few minutes to midnight, but as far as I knew it always had been.

And then, suddenly, the end wasn’t near. Instead of the end times, I spent my formative teen years at the end of history. For the most part, my political and economic sensibilities were formed after the collapse of Soviet communism and before 9/11. The conflict of global superpowers had ended and nothing had yet taken its place. Each year in September, elder pundits fret that the Kids These Days are forgetting the day the planes crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. But the war on terror is a mere blip—albeit a deadly and expensive one—compared to the other mostly metaphorical war of our recent past.

The temptation is to jam the relevant teachings down the throats of a new, amnesiac generation, on the theory that those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. That temptation is greatly amplified by an uptick in disdain for capitalism and globalization among Generation Z. But as Friedrich Nietzsche noted, it is counterproductive to fill young brains with “knowledge, taken in excess without hunger, even contrary to need.”

“Historical education is wholesome and promising for the future,” he explained in “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life,” only in the service of a “powerful new life-giving influence.” Learning about the legacy of communism in school is unlikely to do the trick; I certainly never felt powerful new life-giving influence in a history classroom or while reading a textbook. And it’s hard to imagine that today’s young people nodding over their iPads are faring much better as the events in question grow increasingly distant.

Yet it also won’t do for us to be like goldfish swimming in circles in a bowl, surprised to encounter a plastic castle on each turn. Instead of retreading the well-worn tracks of the simplest narrative of the Cold War or rehearsing a litany of facts and figures, this issue of Reason contains stories about the moment of collapse 30 years ago and the aftermath of that global struggle.

While the causes of the dissolution of the Soviet empire will always be debated, the failure of economic central planning and the huge amount of energy devoted to concealing that emergent fact are the most salient for our present political battles.

Russian émigré Cathy Young describes her lifelong fact-checking mission to remind the American left that the Soviet Union was a dark, deprived place to grow up in the 1970s (page 8). Matt Welch shares a memoir from his time as a newspaper editor in Prague in the early 1990s, where he observed the generative chaos of the end of communist control (page 62).

Emerging markets scholar Jarett Decker asks tough questions about the role of American market theorists in the disastrous post-Soviet economic evolution of Russia (page 24). Liz Wolfe describes how one man’s rare experience of American plenty shaped a propagandistic fantasy of Russian cuisine that was both inauthentic and unobtainable (page 59). Jesse Walker interrogates whether markets can ever really be held at bay, and the ways both open and sub rosa “red markets” sustained communist authoritarians for longer than they deserved (page 50). Stephanie Slade writes about the unlikely bedfellows—President Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, and a network of labor unions—who helped bring down communism in Poland (page 54).

And throughout this issue, readers will find updates about the post-Soviet republics. These are not meant to be encyclopedic but rather to serve as a sampler of the long-tail consequences of Soviet communism in its many forms. The countries’ different fates are instructive and sometimes baffling for anyone looking for easy takeaways.

It’s a terrible thing to feel like a latecomer to history. I’ll confess to some envy over the sense of possibility and radical openness that boomers and early Gen Xers experienced 30 years ago.

In 1991, as it turns out, the Doomsday Clock was the most optimistic about humanity that it has ever been. At the close of that momentous year, the clock showed 17 minutes to midnight. Conceived by former Manhattan Project participants and others who founded the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in 1947, the clock originally was devoted primarily to monitoring the threat of global nuclear annihilation. The Bulletin, like Reason, was a mimeographed collection of essays that evolved into a magazine. It remains one of the most interesting publications you’ve never read.

After that burst of optimism in 1991, the clock keepers leaned into non-nuclear threats, incorporating concerns about climate and biological annihilation as well. In 2021, the Doomsday Clock sits at 100 seconds to midnight.

It is hard now, in the relative material comfort of the current apocalypse, to comprehend the constant grinding scarcity and existential dread that was humanity’s constant companion during the Cold War. And the current manifestations of communism benefit hugely from the material surplus generated by globalization, though perhaps in a way that is ultimately illusory and as unsustainable for them as the Soviet version turned out to be.

The question of whether things are really more dire for humanity than they were in, say, the late 1960s is difficult to answer. Do the hands of the clock capture real threats or just reflect a perverse kind of apocalypse satiation? It may well be that all times are, in fact, the interesting times that the apocryphal Chinese curse wishes upon us.

Nietzsche wondered if the only way to produce vigorous modern people was for them to be like the goldfish or perhaps a cow, living vigorously in the present, untroubled by the greatness or failures of their predecessors.

Only in retrospect does it feel like a blessing to have come of age during the brief end of history. At the time, it was frustrating. The sense that everything important had already been done made many of us cynical and lazy. We believed the great battles were over and that our business was simply to tidy things up and amuse ourselves.

But the sense of living through constant apocalypses is no less enervating. TikTok teens fluently tick off the list of disasters they have survived as explanations for their own disaffection, fatigue, anxiety, and paralysis.

When the chess grandmaster and activist Garry Kasparov sat down with Reason to talk about his unique experience as a Soviet hero and dissident (page 38), he worried about the effects of public amnesia. “Communism and socialism,” he says, have “become popular because people don’t recall what happened….Younger audiences, I think many of them, they couldn’t even tell apart the Cold War and the Trojan War. It’s just something that belonged to ancient history.” With his words and the other stories in this issue, Reason hopes to revive and reanimate the dark history of communism and its aftermath in a way that is useful for life.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3BH9Uw9
via IFTTT

The Uses and Disadvantages of Soviet History for Life


intro

“Welp, this is all wrong now.” The collapse of the Soviet Union is marked for me by a single flickering recollection from sixth-grade homeroom. My classroom had one of those world maps that pulls down like a roller shade, and in the winter of 1991 my teacher seemed vaguely put out that it would now have to be replaced.

In retrospect, I realized his weariness was less about geopolitics and more about the difficulty of requisitioning new teaching aids in the public school system. But at the time it felt appropriately anticlimactic.

I was not raised on duck-and-cover nuclear drills, nor was I terribly aware of the Cold War in my daily life, despite growing up inside the D.C. Beltway. The final days of the Soviet Union were well underway before I had enough brain cells to process the real implications. Red Dawn, with its anti-communist guerrilla kids in letter jackets, was already a kitschy period piece when I saw it for the first time. I was vaguely aware that the Doomsday Clock was at a few minutes to midnight, but as far as I knew it always had been.

And then, suddenly, the end wasn’t near. Instead of the end times, I spent my formative teen years at the end of history. For the most part, my political and economic sensibilities were formed after the collapse of Soviet communism and before 9/11. The conflict of global superpowers had ended and nothing had yet taken its place. Each year in September, elder pundits fret that the Kids These Days are forgetting the day the planes crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. But the war on terror is a mere blip—albeit a deadly and expensive one—compared to the other mostly metaphorical war of our recent past.

The temptation is to jam the relevant teachings down the throats of a new, amnesiac generation, on the theory that those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. That temptation is greatly amplified by an uptick in disdain for capitalism and globalization among Generation Z. But as Friedrich Nietzsche noted, it is counterproductive to fill young brains with “knowledge, taken in excess without hunger, even contrary to need.”

“Historical education is wholesome and promising for the future,” he explained in “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life,” only in the service of a “powerful new life-giving influence.” Learning about the legacy of communism in school is unlikely to do the trick; I certainly never felt powerful new life-giving influence in a history classroom or while reading a textbook. And it’s hard to imagine that today’s young people nodding over their iPads are faring much better as the events in question grow increasingly distant.

Yet it also won’t do for us to be like goldfish swimming in circles in a bowl, surprised to encounter a plastic castle on each turn. Instead of retreading the well-worn tracks of the simplest narrative of the Cold War or rehearsing a litany of facts and figures, this issue of Reason contains stories about the moment of collapse 30 years ago and the aftermath of that global struggle.

While the causes of the dissolution of the Soviet empire will always be debated, the failure of economic central planning and the huge amount of energy devoted to concealing that emergent fact are the most salient for our present political battles.

Russian émigré Cathy Young describes her lifelong fact-checking mission to remind the American left that the Soviet Union was a dark, deprived place to grow up in the 1970s (page 8). Matt Welch shares a memoir from his time as a newspaper editor in Prague in the early 1990s, where he observed the generative chaos of the end of communist control (page 62).

Emerging markets scholar Jarett Decker asks tough questions about the role of American market theorists in the disastrous post-Soviet economic evolution of Russia (page 24). Liz Wolfe describes how one man’s rare experience of American plenty shaped a propagandistic fantasy of Russian cuisine that was both inauthentic and unobtainable (page 59). Jesse Walker interrogates whether markets can ever really be held at bay, and the ways both open and sub rosa “red markets” sustained communist authoritarians for longer than they deserved (page 50). Stephanie Slade writes about the unlikely bedfellows—President Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, and a network of labor unions—who helped bring down communism in Poland (page 54).

And throughout this issue, readers will find updates about the post-Soviet republics. These are not meant to be encyclopedic but rather to serve as a sampler of the long-tail consequences of Soviet communism in its many forms. The countries’ different fates are instructive and sometimes baffling for anyone looking for easy takeaways.

It’s a terrible thing to feel like a latecomer to history. I’ll confess to some envy over the sense of possibility and radical openness that boomers and early Gen Xers experienced 30 years ago.

In 1991, as it turns out, the Doomsday Clock was the most optimistic about humanity that it has ever been. At the close of that momentous year, the clock showed 17 minutes to midnight. Conceived by former Manhattan Project participants and others who founded the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in 1947, the clock originally was devoted primarily to monitoring the threat of global nuclear annihilation. The Bulletin, like Reason, was a mimeographed collection of essays that evolved into a magazine. It remains one of the most interesting publications you’ve never read.

After that burst of optimism in 1991, the clock keepers leaned into non-nuclear threats, incorporating concerns about climate and biological annihilation as well. In 2021, the Doomsday Clock sits at 100 seconds to midnight.

It is hard now, in the relative material comfort of the current apocalypse, to comprehend the constant grinding scarcity and existential dread that was humanity’s constant companion during the Cold War. And the current manifestations of communism benefit hugely from the material surplus generated by globalization, though perhaps in a way that is ultimately illusory and as unsustainable for them as the Soviet version turned out to be.

The question of whether things are really more dire for humanity than they were in, say, the late 1960s is difficult to answer. Do the hands of the clock capture real threats or just reflect a perverse kind of apocalypse satiation? It may well be that all times are, in fact, the interesting times that the apocryphal Chinese curse wishes upon us.

Nietzsche wondered if the only way to produce vigorous modern people was for them to be like the goldfish or perhaps a cow, living vigorously in the present, untroubled by the greatness or failures of their predecessors.

Only in retrospect does it feel like a blessing to have come of age during the brief end of history. At the time, it was frustrating. The sense that everything important had already been done made many of us cynical and lazy. We believed the great battles were over and that our business was simply to tidy things up and amuse ourselves.

But the sense of living through constant apocalypses is no less enervating. TikTok teens fluently tick off the list of disasters they have survived as explanations for their own disaffection, fatigue, anxiety, and paralysis.

When the chess grandmaster and activist Garry Kasparov sat down with Reason to talk about his unique experience as a Soviet hero and dissident (page 38), he worried about the effects of public amnesia. “Communism and socialism,” he says, have “become popular because people don’t recall what happened….Younger audiences, I think many of them, they couldn’t even tell apart the Cold War and the Trojan War. It’s just something that belonged to ancient history.” With his words and the other stories in this issue, Reason hopes to revive and reanimate the dark history of communism and its aftermath in a way that is useful for life.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3BH9Uw9
via IFTTT

Americans Who Received J&J Jab More Likely To Develop Rare Blood Clots, New Study Finds

Americans Who Received J&J Jab More Likely To Develop Rare Blood Clots, New Study Finds

It’s starting to seem like nary a day goes by that the world doesn’t isn’t confronted with new research raising safety questions about either the mRNA vaccines (mostly Moderna) or the adenovirus-vector jabs like the AstraZeneca and J&J jabs.

On Monday, the bad news focused on the adenovirus jabs, particularly the J&J jab, as researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota, who published their findings in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared data from the general population before the pandemic to data gathered from reported vaccine side effects suffered by Americans.

What they found was disturbing: a person who received the vaccine was 3.5x as likely to develop brain blood clots as an average person before the pandemic.

Blood clots, and specifically cerebral venous sinus thrombosis are well known side-effects of the J&J vaccine, and the discovery of this risk was the reason usage of the vaccine was paused in April. Still, however, the team insists the side-effect is rare and that the findings must be looked at in the context of the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe cases COVID-19.

The data were gathered from Olmstead, County, Minnesota – a county of around 158,000 people situated around 90 miles southeast of Minneapolis – from 2001 to 2015, per the Daily Mail.

They then used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to find diagnoses of blood clots in people who received the J&J vaccine between the jab’s approval date at the end of February 2021 to May 7.

During the 14 years before the pandemic, there were only 39 Olmstead residents who developed CVST – a rare, potentially deadly, blood clotting condition.

However, after the jabs were being used to treat COVID, that number shot up to 46 reports of CVST confirmed in the VAERS program following patients’ who received J&J jabs. Alhough eight were eventually removed from that pool for either being duplicate reports or not being professionally diagnosed. In total, 38 cases tied to the J&J vaccine were detected, with over 70% being among women.

The discrepancy here is pretty difficult to ignore.

around 8.7MM doses of the J&J vaccine had been administered in the US between February and May.

  • Adjusted for population, there were 2.46 cases of CVST out of every 100,000 person-years, pre-COVID, pre-vaccine.

  • However, when also adjusted for population, there were 8.65 cases out of every 100,000 person-years among people who received the vaccine – a rate 3.5 times higher than the general population.

Could it be a coincidence? Perhaps… but it certainly justifies closer examination.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 11/02/2021 – 05:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3w5PJXT Tyler Durden