OPEC+ Preview: A “More Complex” Meeting On Deck

OPEC+ Preview: A “More Complex” Meeting On Deck

Submitted by NewsSquawk

OPEC+ producers are likely to maintain the current policy of 400k BPD monthly hikes, according to sources. However, the upcoming meeting will be more complex than the previous confabs given recent/ongoing major events: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, progress on the Iranian Nuclear Deal, and Brent sustaining above USD 100/bbls.

Looking at where the group stands. OPEC-13 members are in something of a sweet spot with regards to the oil price, not being involved in a war, and as Russian crude looks less attractive. Conversely, the group faces the prospect of Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) releases alongside Iranian oil legally entering the market, which would provide less of an incentive to open the taps beyond the pact. All in all, the path of least resistance is seemingly for OPEC* to continue with the current hike plan whilst stressing flexibility.

RUSSIA-UKRAINE: The threat of energy export sanctions on Russia and the subsequent shortfall other producers must pick up may get discussed. Some have suggested that US officials want to avoid sanctions on Russian energy exports as it’ll further stimulate crude prices. OPEC* delegates cited by Energy Intel believe the risk premium in crude prices (at at around February 25th). was some USD 10-15/bbl. Note, some business channels have been flagging the idea that Saudi Arabia could attempt to rein in Russian aggression with a move similar to the 2020 price war (output surge and OSP slash) – but it may be in Saudi’s best interest to not get involved – for the sake of oil prices, relations with Russia and amid the prospect of additional business arising from potential Russian sanctions.

IRANIAN NUCLEAR DEAL/ UNDER-PRODUCTION: OPEC+ members will also have to discuss the inclusion of Iran in its output quotas given the progress flagged by both sides in recent days on the revival of the nuclear deal – albeit some sticking points remain. An Iranian official said if US sanctions are lifted. Iran could boost its oil output to 4mln BPD from 2.5mln in about 3 months, according to Energy Intel. Despite sanctions. Argus estimated that Iran exported 789k BPD of crude in January (vs 705k 04 2020 average vs 2.3mln BPD pre-sanction exports). Meanwhile OPEC itself is facing difficulties with some producers lagging behind their monthly quotas – namely Nigeria and Angola.

OIL PRICES/JTC: The Russia-Ukraine developments aided Brent prices to regain a footing above USD 100/bbl for the first time since 2014. and despite the external pressure from consumers such as the US and India. OPEC* has remained reluctant to go beyond their pact thus far. The rise in oil prices has also lifted the global inflationary picture – thus leading to talks of further SPR releases to stem prices. WSJ sources reported that IEA members may agree to a release of 70mln bbl from stockpiles this week.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/01/2022 – 08:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/kDshgq7 Tyler Durden

“Breadbasket Of World” Choked Off By Russian Invasion As Wheat Prices Soar

“Breadbasket Of World” Choked Off By Russian Invasion As Wheat Prices Soar

Ukraine has earned the nickname “breadbasket of Europe” for its rich dark soil, vast wheat fields, and other farm goods. The Russian invasion has cut off the world from cheap and abundant wheat supplies.

Ukraine and Russia are vital to the global food supply, accounting for more than a quarter of global wheat trade, about a fifth of corn, and 12% of all calories traded globally, according to Bloomberg

Reuters reports Ukrainian ports will remain closed until the Russian invasion ends and maritime security is restored for commercial ships. 

This means all shipments of farm goods from Ukraine have ceased, and commodity traders will have to search elsewhere. 

Activity at Ukrainian ports has been halted since Russia invaded its neighbor last week, and grains trade from Russia is also effectively on pause. Sanctions have been ratcheted up to further isolate commodity-rich Russia from global finance by sanctioning its central bank and cutting off various leaders from the critical SWIFT financial messaging system.

Restricting grain supplies from the Black Sea region threatens to further boost global food prices that are near a record high, at a time when supplies are already strained with adverse weather in many growing regions. – Bloomberg 

“If the conflict is prolonged — three months, four months from now — I feel the consequences could be really serious,” Andree Defois, president of consultant Strategie Grains, told Bloomberg. “Wheat will need to be rationed.”

Michael Magdovitz, a senior analyst at Rabobank, said Ukraine and Russia had increased harvests and exports in the last decade at a far lower cost than western farmers, which helped keep wheat prices low. However, that’s not the case today as the Russian invasion sends wheat futures trading in Chicago to a six-year high. 

“I’m not going to put a lid on what might happen,” Arlan Suderman, chief commodities economist at StoneX, told Bloomberg. “We could easily be looking at record prices.”

Kyiv-based researcher UkrAgroConsult warned, “the chain of product creation, from cultivation to port shipments, is paralyzed.” 

This brings us back to Goldman’s Global Head of Commodities Research Jeffrey Currie, who told Bloomberg TV earlier this month that he’s never seen commodity markets pricing in the shortages they are right now.

“I’ve been doing this 30 years and I’ve never seen markets like this,” Currie told Bloomberg TV in an interview on Monday. “This is a molecule crisis. We’re out of everything, I don’t care if it’s oil, gas, coal, copper, aluminum, you name it we’re out of it.”

As supplies tighen, the Bloomberg Agriculture Spot Index soars to new record highs. 

The disruption comes as global food prices are already nearing record-highs and could soon be catapulted into unknown territory.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/01/2022 – 08:26

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/9sjGdBP Tyler Durden

The Trials of Rasmea Odeh, Part Two — A Bombing in Jerusalem

This is the second of four posts on The Trials of Rasmea Odeh.

Jerusalem’s Supersol was crowded on Friday morning, February 21, 1969, as shoppers hurried to get ready for the coming Sabbath. At about 11:00 a.m., a bomb exploded near the meat counter, ripping through the shelves and ceiling and sending debris flying across the store. Two botany students were killed—immigrant roommates, from South Africa and Uruguay—who were buying supplies for a coming field trip. Dozens were injured, including an Auschwitz survivor and a U.N. attache.

Israel had already been on edge, following a series of bombings and international terror attacks, and the police were reasonably fearful that “private vengeance” might be carried out against Jerusalem’s Palestinian population. Roadblocks were set up outside Palestinian neighborhoods, more or less successfully preventing angry mobs from attacking their Palestinian neighbors.

The police also proudly announced a series of “round-ups,” taking about 150 Palestinians into custody for questioning. Odeh’s supporters later portrayed these as arbitrary arrests, but in fact they were mostly short term detentions, with the individuals quickly released after interrogation. The Palestinians, of course, did not view the mass detentions as benign, but the Israelis ultimately only charged actual suspects, against whom there was indeed evidence.

It took only a few days for Israeli security officers to show up, in the middle of the night, at the Odeh home in al-Birah. Not only was Rasmea Odeh a known PFLP associate, she had also been ratted out by a co-conspirator who gave up her name, and others, under duress and probably torture. Bombmaking equipment—including timers, detonating cords, and gelignite—was recovered from Odeh’s bedroom, as was a receipt from the Supersol.

Blindfolded, Odeh was taken to Jerusalem’s Russian Compound, originally a 19th century hostel, known and feared by Palestinians as “Moskobiya” or, as Odeh put it, the “torture factory.”

Odeh’s interrogation was brutal, she was intermittently beaten, chained to a wall, and deprived of sleep. The Israeli authorities denied using such techniques at the time, but it was later determined by an Israeli commission, among others, that those methods were then indeed common in security interrogations. Odeh also claimed to have been sexually abused, an accusation for which there is no solid extrinsic evidence.

It did not take long for Odeh to confess. She initially claimed implausibly that she had acted alone, in an attempt to shield her comrades, but the Israelis didn’t buy it. They were looking for the proverbial “ticking bomb,” not trying simply to secure evidence for a conviction, so they continued the interrogation until Odeh gave up the names of both her accomplices and others in her PFLP network.

The true story, which was much later confirmed in documentary interviews on Jordanian television and the Arabic language memoirs of admitted participants in the operation, was that Odeh had visited the Supersol before the date of the operation, purchasing a tin of jam. Later, the conspirators gathered at Odeh’s home—her other family members were away—where the explosives were assembled and concealed in the tin. Two of her comrades then returned to the supermarket and placed the tin back on a shelf, figuring that it would not be recognized as out of place. Odeh herself later went back to Jerusalem and planted another bomb at the British consulate, which exploded without harming anyone.

Odeh’s prosecution extended over months, as she vainly attempted to suppress her confession in an Israeli procedure known as a “trial within a trial.” Her motion was predictably denied, as interrogators’ frequent resort to torture had not yet been publicly acknowledged and the security officials lied to the court. Even without the confession, however, there was significant evidence of Odeh’s guilt, such as the ordinance and receipt discovered under her bed.

She was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in January 1970.

The next post will be about Odeh’s ten years in prison and eventual immigration to the United States.

The post The Trials of Rasmea Odeh, Part Two — A Bombing in Jerusalem appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/5B0tiyg
via IFTTT

The Trials of Rasmea Odeh, Part Two — A Bombing in Jerusalem

This is the second of four posts on The Trials of Rasmea Odeh.

Jerusalem’s Supersol was crowded on Friday morning, February 21, 1969, as shoppers hurried to get ready for the coming Sabbath. At about 11:00 a.m., a bomb exploded near the meat counter, ripping through the shelves and ceiling and sending debris flying across the store. Two botany students were killed—immigrant roommates, from South Africa and Uruguay—who were buying supplies for a coming field trip. Dozens were injured, including an Auschwitz survivor and a U.N. attache.

Israel had already been on edge, following a series of bombings and international terror attacks, and the police were reasonably fearful that “private vengeance” might be carried out against Jerusalem’s Palestinian population. Roadblocks were set up outside Palestinian neighborhoods, more or less successfully preventing angry mobs from attacking their Palestinian neighbors.

The police also proudly announced a series of “round-ups,” taking about 150 Palestinians into custody for questioning. Odeh’s supporters later portrayed these as arbitrary arrests, but in fact they were mostly short term detentions, with the individuals quickly released after interrogation. The Palestinians, of course, did not view the mass detentions as benign, but the Israelis ultimately only charged actual suspects, against whom there was indeed evidence.

It took only a few days for Israeli security officers to show up, in the middle of the night, at the Odeh home in al-Birah. Not only was Rasmea Odeh a known PFLP associate, she had also been ratted out by a co-conspirator who gave up her name, and others, under duress and probably torture. Bombmaking equipment—including timers, detonating cords, and gelignite—was recovered from Odeh’s bedroom, as was a receipt from the Supersol.

Blindfolded, Odeh was taken to Jerusalem’s Russian Compound, originally a 19th century hostel, known and feared by Palestinians as “Moskobiya” or, as Odeh put it, the “torture factory.”

Odeh’s interrogation was brutal, she was intermittently beaten, chained to a wall, and deprived of sleep. The Israeli authorities denied using such techniques at the time, but it was later determined by an Israeli commission, among others, that those methods were then indeed common in security interrogations. Odeh also claimed to have been sexually abused, an accusation for which there is no solid extrinsic evidence.

It did not take long for Odeh to confess. She initially claimed implausibly that she had acted alone, in an attempt to shield her comrades, but the Israelis didn’t buy it. They were looking for the proverbial “ticking bomb,” not trying simply to secure evidence for a conviction, so they continued the interrogation until Odeh gave up the names of both her accomplices and others in her PFLP network.

The true story, which was much later confirmed in documentary interviews on Jordanian television and the Arabic language memoirs of admitted participants in the operation, was that Odeh had visited the Supersol before the date of the operation, purchasing a tin of jam. Later, the conspirators gathered at Odeh’s home—her other family members were away—where the explosives were assembled and concealed in the tin. Two of her comrades then returned to the supermarket and placed the tin back on a shelf, figuring that it would not be recognized as out of place. Odeh herself later went back to Jerusalem and planted another bomb at the British consulate, which exploded without harming anyone.

Odeh’s prosecution extended over months, as she vainly attempted to suppress her confession in an Israeli procedure known as a “trial within a trial.” Her motion was predictably denied, as interrogators’ frequent resort to torture had not yet been publicly acknowledged and the security officials lied to the court. Even without the confession, however, there was significant evidence of Odeh’s guilt, such as the ordinance and receipt discovered under her bed.

She was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in January 1970.

The next post will be about Odeh’s ten years in prison and eventual immigration to the United States.

The post The Trials of Rasmea Odeh, Part Two — A Bombing in Jerusalem appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/5B0tiyg
via IFTTT

Is The West’s Financial Blitzkrieg Working?

Is The West’s Financial Blitzkrieg Working?

Authored by Bill Blain via MorningPorridge.com,

Sometimes life played with him, sometimes it hung on him like a stone round the neck of a drowned man.

Russia thought it would roll over Ukraine, but the West’s Financial Blitzkrieg now threatens to trigger the unravelling of Putin’s autocracy. Excellent! The West needs Russia and Russia needs the West. It’s Putin’s kleptocracy we could all do without…   

Well, this is new and exciting… We’ve invented a whole new way to wage war! And it might even work.

It only took a day – but what we’ve already learnt about Financial Blitzkrieg is you can’t have half-measures. You need to go in brutal, all-out and nasty from the get-go. Don’t worry how messy it gets – go in hard and don’t stop punching. Don’t bring a knife to a financial fight – bring machine guns and lots of sanctions.

Messy it will get. Citicorp’s $10 bln exposure to Russia is a rounding error, but Austria’s Raiffeisen’s $9 bln number will hurt. (Austria is also 100% dependent on Russian energy.) Not surprisingly, French and Italian banks are on the hook for some $25 bln – no surprises there – but even that is “acceptable” blue-on-blue collateral damage.

The Aviation industry will take a potential pasting from aircraft leased to Russian operators – with some $5 bln of planes at risk. BP will take a thumping divesting from Rosnef, but they should be talking to the UAE – which is holding firm on its Russian positions, waiting to see what happens – while sending clear signals about where they see themselves in the future as neutral geopolitical ground. Londongrad property? Ouch.

The West surprised everyone – especially ourselves – with the scale of the weekend financial assault on Russia. The crunch moment that swung Europe behind stronger sanctions was a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. He told them he didn’t expect to survive to speak to them again. Even the Germans were moved. Zelensky is that good.

Europe and the West should now go much further.

Completely freeze all Russian access to Swift. Worry not about Energy in Europe – it might be short-term painful, but the long-range weather forecast is for a mild European spring.  Seize any and all Russian assets, including the half-sunken Oligarch gin-palace a Ukrainian engineer tried to sink. Squeeze the pips till the b*st*rds choke.

And make sure the Russian people know why. Make clear to every Russian how they behave today determines their personal future tomorrow. The West is watching – which is why oligarchs like Abramovich are trying to play both ends and their kids are breaking ranks. Better to lose $1 bln, keep $100mm, than be a head on a spike with nothing.

Yesterday conclusively demonstrated no nation exists on its own when it comes to global money. Especially an intrinsically weak and suspicious state like Russia. Nations remain interconnected. What use is Russia’s Fortress-economy when it ends up under economic siege? Its carefully rebuilt foreign reserves neutralised on a pen-stroke. Millions of Russians finding their savings blocked. And asking why… and for what..? Maybe they aren’t aware its Ukrainian cities their Katyusha rocket artillery is flattening…

And some point soon, a leading oligarch or a general will be on the phone to one of Russia’s most successful new business enterprises, the Wagner Group, to offer them a new contract. In Moscow. Perhaps they will reassign their operatives currently in Kyiv looking to assassinate Ukrainian President Zelensky.

If I can figure that might happen.. imagine how Vladimir Putin feels this morning… looking around, wondering who will betray him? Belarus hackers mounted a cyber-attack on their own nation’s infrastructure yesterday.

The reality is simple. The West needs Russia’s commodity resources. Russia needs the West’s open markets. That’s a win/win trade.

The alternative for Russia is bleak: become a price taker from China, which will prove entirely sub-optimal. China will treat them abysmally, and probably seek to integrate mineral-rich Siberia into their co-prosperity sphere.  The alternative upside is to stop trying to f*ck with the West – and become part of it.  Share the mutual prosperity… access to Western goods, tech and services.. or become China’s serf? Russia – You Choose.

Russia still has a chance to make this good. The chances… who knows?

I got a panicked call yesterday asking what I knew about Russian default. Wow. That triggered some memories. Russia has broken itself before. It’s doing it again.  Yesterday, someone in the Kremlin announced Russian borrowers would stop repaying foreign loans, triggering immediate speculation it was an “event of default”. The comment was swiftly withdrawn. But it was an interesting moment…

Somewhere in a box up in my loft are some defaulted Tsarist bonds I bought back in the 1980s. I bought Russian bonds again in 1998. But, I couldn’t get my hands on the definitive bonds because unlike Tzar Nicholas’ debt, they actually matured and paid out! Which was a most pleasant surprise.

Russia managed to conclusively wreck their economy during the 1990s as the excesses and corruption of communism we replaced by naked financial banditry. According to the numpties on the extreme right in the USA – who for some curious reason seem to love Putin – it was entirely the West’s fault. Sovereign responsibility – just like personal responsibility – is naebody’s responsibility but yer own!

The Russians have historically demonstrated an extreme talent for fiscal, monetary and political instability for centuries. (Don’t get me wrong – I love Russians, they are charming, funny and passionate people. I love the culture, even their dark and melancholy souls. My favourite authors include Tolstoy, Sholokov (Quiet Flows the Don), and Pasternak… but they do have a talent for picking bad leaders.)

The 1998 Russian collapse occurred because Russia was broke, over-extended, exhausted by the costs of invading Chechyna, facing a chronic funding imbalance just as liquidity dried up as investors lost confidence in the pace of reform. Does that sound familiar? The country was under pressure all round – striking miners, transport workers and an increasing sense of grievance at Boris Yeltsin’s chronically mismanaged, ineffectual government and his blind eye to corruption and the state capture by oligarchs. Ring any bells?

It was Boris that brought in the relatively unknown former spook (and occasional St Petersberg taxi driver) Vladimir Putin as the new head of Federal Security.

The crunch came when the Ruble was devalued, the country defaulted and a moratorium was announced. Yeltsin was gone by the Autumn. History is kind of circular.

Trump recently said Putin was a genius. Unusually, there is an element of truth in that. Putin leveraged his position into the Presidency, inserted himself into every pie, and ensured he got the bulk of every kopek the kleptocracy ripped out of the Russian peoples’ soul. Evil genius indeed.

I remember the Russia default well. Back in August 1998 I was on holiday in Greece with two very young kids when LTCM, the “smartest hedge fund on the planet” with more Nobel prize winners than you could point the proverbial sharp-pointy stick at, collapsed in a liquidity storm. It was floored by a tidal wave of collateral mayhem triggered by a succession of “3-Sigma” market events – at least that was their excuse. At the core was the Russian Debt Crisis.

My then wife was singularly unimpressed as I spent days on my phone trying to fathom our positions, exposures and opportunities.. This was back in the days when phones were relatively new and simple things.. mine was dead modern – it could store and memorise up to 100 numbers! You definitely could not send emails or access the internet from it. Myself and half-a-dozen other bankers at the same resort ran out of fax-paper.

Among other things.. LTCM collapsed because they’d bought Russian domestic debt. As Russia unwound, LTCM got caught in a cascade of exits triggering a one-way market that crushed asset prices across multiple global markets. (Russia was not the only trade they got badly wrong – their losses on Russia were a fraction of what the collapsing swap market cost them, but it was all broadly interconnected and there are always consequences.)

As the Fed desperately tried to stop LTCM’s collapse becoming a run on the global financial system, the big US banks met to discuss a rescue. Apparently, the hold-out was my firm, Bear Stearns. The tensions in that room in 1998 apparently set the tone for 10-years later when the same banks let Lehman go to the wall… but that’s a story for another day..

Today, the west can weather whatever the coming, dare-I-say inevitable, Russian default and financial denouement throws up. What will be more interesting is how the West ensures it doesn’t happen again by making sure Russian V.3.1 is more honest, more liberal and less kleptocratic than what’s gone before. The Russians are good people. Their leaders are not..

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/01/2022 – 08:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/DYqwzCW Tyler Durden

Futures, Treasury Yields Tumble As Ukraine News Spike Risk Off Mood

Futures, Treasury Yields Tumble As Ukraine News Spike Risk Off Mood

In a mirror image of yesterday’s overnight bounce, S&P futures and European markets have slumped to session lows as a risk off mood prevailed as US traders got to their desks having hit overnight highs of 4,399 just before the European open, as mood soured after the conflict in Ukraine intensified amid mounting penalties against Russia, and as participants look to a heavy data-docket ahead and Fed speak including Powell later in the week.

Any residual optimism was shattered after Ukrainian President Zelensky said that negotiations with the Russian side have not achieved required results while Russian Defense Minister Shoygu says Russia will continue operations in Ukraine until it achieves its goals. As a result, Nasdaq 100 contracts were down 0.9% as of 7 a.m. in New York after the cash index closed yesterday’s session with its second straight monthly decline, a trend not seen since October 2020. S&P 500 futures declined 0.7% or 30 points to 4,337  while Dow futures fell 0.7% or 230 points, reversing much of yesterday’s last hour ramp. Stocks trading in Moscow remained halted for a second day, and the VanEck Russia ETF plunged another 12%. Treasury yields fell for a second day to the lowest since January, and the dollar was steady. Brent crude jumped more than 5% as traders balanced the possible release of emergency stockpiles against fears of disruption to Russian energy exports.

Hopes of an early negotiated settlement over Ukraine faded after Russia vowed to continue its attack until its goals are met, and troops were seen moving in a large convoy toward the capital, Kyiv. Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi said that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s threat to resort to nuclear weapons requires a “swift, firm, united reaction.” Meanwhile, Moscow imposed capital controls as Putin sought countermeasures against fresh sanctions walloping the economy.

Among notable premarket moves, Zoom Video tumbled 4.6% after its sales forecast for the current quarter fell short of Street estimates, while Lucid Group sank as much as 15% after cutting its production target for 2022 due to “extraordinary supply chain and logistics” issues. Other notable premarket movers include:

  • Baidu’s (BIDU US) American depositary receipts rise 3.6% in premarket trading Tuesday after the company reported better- than-expected fourth-quarter revenue and earnings.
  • Chevron (CVX US) raises its share buyback guidance to $5b to $10b per year. Stock up 1.6% premarket.
  • Jack Henry (JKHY US) upgraded to outperform and price target set at Street-high $206 by Oppenheimer, which cites “bullish” view on competitive positioning following investor meetings with the company’s CEO. Shares up 0.6% premarket.
  • Shares of EV and clean energy vehicle companies Tesla (TSLA US) and NIO (NIO US) decline in U.S. premarket after rival Lucid Group slashed its production target for 2022 citing “extraordinary” challenges with logistics and its supply chain.

Meanwhile, as the March Federal Open Market Committee meeting approaches, expectations for how aggressive the central bank will be in its interest-rate path are sliding, with odds of a 50bps rate hike dropping to just 10% this morning.

“Expectations for interest rate rises were built on confidence of economic growth, however the invasion dampens these hopes,” said Lewis Grant, senior portfolio manager of global equities at Federated Hermes. “If growth starts to become more scarce, you could see a further shift in risk appetite, especially considering the huge amount of uncertainty around Russia’s next move and the West’s response.”

In Europe, the Stoxx 600 slumped 1.9% with travel and leisure, utilities and auto stocks among the biggest decliners as traders assessed the effect of sanctions. Bayer AG gained after positive results, but warned that the Ukraine conflict poses a risk to its outlook. The Stoxx Europe 600 Basic Resources Index gave up an earlier 2.1% gain to be little changed but still the top sector in Europe and outperforming the broader market, as iron ore rises on China manufacturing data, while base metals gain on supply concerns. Basic resources was the only sector in the green as commodity prices extended a rally.

Here are some of the biggest European movers today:

  • Thales shares rise as much as 8.1%, its sixth day of gains, as Jefferies upgrades, citing momentum for defense stocks from the war in Ukraine
  • Beiersdorf jumps as much as 5.8% to the highest since November after the company reported sales for the full year that met the average analyst estimate
  • Man Group gains as much as 5% after results that UBS (buy) said topped consensus.
  • FD Technologies rises as much as 27% after the firm entered a strategic partnership agreement with Microsoft to expand the reach of FD’s KX Insights streaming data analytics platform.
  • U.K.-listed Russian metal stocks plummeted: Polymetal drops as much as 29%, given Russia has all the hallmarks of an uninvestable market for global investors
  • Flutter Entertainment drops as much as 15% after full-year results that Shore Capital said were at the low end of guidance.
  • Atos plunges as much as 16% after the French IT-services company gave an outlook for 2022 that Citi said implies a further 25%-30% cut for consensus Ebit estimates. Oddo downgraded the stock.
  • Zalando slumps as much as 11%, the most since Nov. 3, after the online fashion retailer provided an outlook that Bryan Garnier called “mixed.” There may be some “small downgrades” to consensus expectations, according to Morgan Stanley.

European bonds gained, with Germany’s 10-year yield heading back below zero percent for the first time since January. Traders are betting the European Central Bank will put off raising interest rates until next year as the economic fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine dents growth in the region. In fact, odds of the first rate hike by the ECB were just pushed back to 2023 from Dec 2022.

With Russia keeping its local stock exchange closed for a second day, foreign-listed shares in Russian companies tumbled again on Tuesday, in an indication of how they may react to sanctions when local trading reopens. The ruble stabilized after its worst plunge on record on Monday. But as Bloomberg reported overnight, there’s a growing risk that Russia’s stocks and bonds could be kicked out of major investment benchmarks as they become increasingly hard to trade.

Here are the latest geopolitical news surrounding Ukraine:

  • Satellite image company Maxar said new images showed military convoy seen north of Kyiv is considerably longer than the 17 miles initially reported with the convoy stretching approximately 40 miles.
  • EU Competition Commissioner Vestager says Russian gas cannot be banned completely, via Spiegel.
  • Ukrainian President Zelensky says that negotiations with the Russian side have not achieved required results, via AJA Breaking.
  • Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov says Ukraine still has Soviet nuclear technologies, cannot fail to respond to this danger, Russia is prepared for joint work with the US on strategic stability. Unacceptable for Russia that some European countries host US nuclear weapons, and should be returned to US territory.
  • Russian Defense Minister Shoygu says Russia will continue operations in Ukraine until it achieves its goals, according to Interfax.
  • Russia’s Kremlin says it is too early to assess results of talks at the moment; no plans at the moment from President Putin to speak with Ukraine President Zelensky.
  • Belarus troops have reportedly entered Ukraine territory through Chernihiv region, according to Ukrainian parliament twitter.
  • Russia stated that the US expulsion of 12 diplomats is a hostile act, according to AFP.
  • SWIFT Messaging System says it is engaging with authorities to understand which entities are subject to new measures, will disconnect these on receipt of legal instruction to do so.
  • US Senator Graham called for sanctions on Russia’s energy sector.
  • Russia Security Council Deputy Chair says: “Some French minister has said that they declared an economic war on Russia. Watch your tongue, gentlemen! And don’t forget that in human history, economic wars quite often turned into real ones”. In response to earlier commentary from French Finance Minister Le Maire
  • Mastercard (MA) blocked multiple financial institutions from the Mastercard payment network following sanctions.
  • EU Commission is to propose sanction restrictions on RT and Sputnik’s access to the European media market.
  • Italian PMI Draghi has made a proposal to intensify pressure on the CBR and wants the BIS to take part in sanctions, via Reuters.

Markets have been whipsawed by the conflict and steps to isolate commodity-rich Russia. Disruptions to supplies of raw materials such as grain and energy threaten to stoke already-high inflation and hamper growth, just as the Federal Reserve prepares to raise interest rates. Lenders worldwide are already making it harder to finance transactions involving Russian resources.

“We could see a longer off-ramp for inflation here” amid the added pressures to energy prices from the Russian invasion, Tracie McMillion, head of global asset allocation strategy at Wells Fargo Investment Institute, said on Bloomberg Television. She said a half-point Fed hike in March “is probably off the table” while adding she expects four quarter-point increases in 2022.

Elsewhere, an Asia-Pacific equity gauge rose for a third session, aided by a climb in Japan, as diplomacy talks between Russia and Ukraine fueled hopes for a short-term solution. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index climbed as much as 0.8%, on track for its biggest three-day gain in a month. Technology and communication-services shares were the largest contributors to the gauge. Benchmarks in Japan outperformed the region amid hopes for a gentler pace of U.S. interest rate increases. “Some near-term relief can be seen for now as both parties are willing to carry out diplomacy talks to reach a peaceful conflict resolution,” said Jun Rong Yeap, a market strategist at IG Asia Pte. “Also, with the ongoing conflict, expectations for aggressive Federal Reserve tightening are being pared back.” Investors’ concerns over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine eased slightly after both sides agreed to continue another round of talks in the coming days. Still, a wait-and-see mood dominates as global funds seek to assess the economic impact of sanctions imposed on Russia. Asian equities have fared better than their European and U.S. counterparts amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, with the benchmark falling about 2% the past two weeks. Some risk-averse investors view the region as a safe haven, according to Hajime Sakai, chief fund manager at Mito Securities Co.  “Valuations for Japanese equities — although they always have been — are cheap,” Sakai said. “Plus, the recent situation makes it hard for investors to buy European stocks, which have been cheap compared to U.S. equities. In that sense, it feels like there could be a shift of funds to invest here.” Hong Kong stocks edged higher amid reports that the city is planning a lockdown for Covid-19 testing. Markets in South Korea and India were closed for holidays.

Japanese equities climbed for a third day, as investors hoped for limited local impact from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine while seeing cause for optimism that U.S. monetary policy may be more benign than previously feared. Electronics makers and telecoms were the biggest boosts to the Topix, which rose 0.5%. Tokyo Electron and Fast Retailing were the largest contributors to a 1.2% advance in the Nikkei 225. In Ukraine, a delegation led by Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov met with Russian counterparts on the northern border with Belarus on Monday, the first opportunity for negotiations since Russia invaded. Meanwhile, the MNI Chicago PMI fell to 56.3 in February compared with 65.2 in January. “The possibility of another round of talks is providing a sense of relief,” said Hideyuki Ishiguro, a senior strategist at Nomura Asset Management. “The U.S. Chicago Business Index showed growth momentum for the real economy is slowing, which is helping ease concern over any aggressive monetary tightening.”

In rates, Treasuries sharply bull-steepen as front-end yields richen by more than 15bp, propelled by a wave of risk-aversion in financial markets during European morning. Treasury yields richer by 15bp to 8bp across the curve with 2s10s, 5s30s spreads steeper by ~5bp on the day; 10-year yields drop to around 1.72%, with bunds and gilts outperforming by 6bp-7bp in the sector. Yields on European benchmarks dropped, with Italian yields shedding around 20bps, as investors exit short positions and spread wideners after recent dovish comments from ECB policy makers; Bund yields fell below zero.  Bunds and gilts outperform longer-dated Treasuries, with futures markets pricing in fewer rate hikes by both Fed and ECB. S&P 500 futures are under pressure as Russia’s war on Ukraine intensified, drawing mounting financial penalties. Swaps referencing Fed policy meetings no longer price in any chance of a March rate hike exceeding 25bp, with 118bp of hikes priced into December FOMC. Traders Abandon Bets on a Half-Point Fed Rate Hike in March.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index inched up as the greenback traded mixed versus its Group-of-10 peers; the yen and commodity currencies were steady to higher while the euro and Scandinavian currencies weakened. The euro gave up gains after earlier trading above $1.12. The pound held steady the against the euro and the dollar, while gilts advanced. Markets will look to speeches from the Bank of England’s Michael Saunders and Catherine Mann, policy makers who voted for a 50bps hike back in February, for clues on how the central bank’s reaction function could be affected by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Australian dollar rose a third day to touch a six- week high versus the greenback in early European session, before paring gains. Australia’s yield curve steepened, with 10-year yield 5bps firmer, after the RBA kept interest rates at a record low and said it would be some time before wage gains are consistent with its inflation target; it also said it will remain “patient” as it assesses risks stemming from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting jolt to energy prices.

In commodities, Ccude futures advance. Brent soared above $103 a barrel, as WTI spiked 5% above $100 level. Spot gold rises roughly $12 to trade above $1,920/oz. Most base metals trade in the green; LME aluminum outperforms peers Wheat futures rose by the 50 cent limit. Bitcoin remains bid and has extended above yesterday’s best levels thus far, rising above 44,000.

Looking ahead, we get US Final PMIs, German Prelim. CPI, US ISM Manufacturing PMI & Construction Spending, New Zealand Export
/Import Prices, Speeches from Fed’s Bostic & Mester, ECB’s Lagarde, BoE’s Saunders & US President Biden’s State of the Union Address.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures down 0.3% to 4,354.75
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 1.0% to 448.39
  • MXAP up 0.7% to 183.52
  • MXAPJ up 0.5% to 599.67
  • Nikkei up 1.2% to 26,844.72
  • Topix up 0.5% to 1,897.17
  • Hang Seng Index up 0.2% to 22,761.71
  • Shanghai Composite up 0.8% to 3,488.84
  • Sensex up 0.7% to 56,247.28
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.7% to 7,096.55
  • Kospi up 0.8% to 2,699.18
  • German 10Y yield little changed at 0.07%
  • Euro little changed at $1.1218
  • Brent Futures up 3.6% to $101.47/bbl
  • Brent Futures up 3.6% to $101.47/bbl
  • Gold spot up 0.3% to $1,915.33
  • U.S. Dollar Index little changed at 96.71

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • Russia intensified shelling overnight of key cities in Ukraine as its troops on the ground move slowly in a large convoy toward the capital, Kyiv. The mayor of Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second- largest city, said residential areas were being bombed in what he called “a war to destroy the Ukrainian people”
  • The invasion of Ukraine is causing a mass exodus of companies from Russia, reversing three decades of investment by Western and other foreign businesses there following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991
  • It’s possible that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will lead to stagflation, ECB Governing Council member Olli Rehn told Kauppalehti in an interview, adding that it’s still too early to assess the impact on the European economy
  • “Inflation will most likely remain higher than initially thought and of course these restrictions and higher prices will decrease economic growth,” ECB Governing Council member Martins Kazaks tells Latvian TV
  • Italian inflation surged to a record for a third straight month, heaping more pressure on the European Central Bank after higher-than-expected readings from Spain and France
  • Billions of dollars in cash is at risk of being trapped, stock funds have plunged, and capital controls are choking off money flows. Russia has all the hallmarks of an uninvestable market for global investors

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

Asia-Pac stocks began the month mostly on the front foot after Monday’s intraday rebound on Wall St where the major indices finished mixed but off worse levels and following talks between Russia and Ukraine with another round of discussions to take place in the coming days, while the region also digested encouraging Chinese PMI data. ASX 200 gained amid a cyclical bias with outperformance in tech, financials and industrials leading the index. Nikkei 225 traded higher and briefly climbed above 27k where it then met some resistance. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp. were mixed with the mainland kept afloat after the better than expected Chinese Official Manufacturing and Caixin Manufacturing PMI data, while Hong Kong lagged with the city set for a 9-day lockdown later this month alongside mass COVID-19 testing.

Top Asian News

  • Kishida’s First BOJ Board Picks Hint at More Neutral Stance
  • Asian Stocks Rally for Third Day as Risk Sentiment Improves
  • Hong Kong’s Ballooning Covid Cases Shatter Investor Confidence
  • Baidu’s Sales Beat After Cloud Arm Offsets China Slowdown

In Europe, sentiment in equities has moved to risk-off as the mornings Russia-Ukraine updates are generally downbeat, albeit at a limited frequency vs recent sessions. Currently, Euro Stoxx 50 -2.5% after an indecisive open given a largely update APAC handover post-data. Stateside, US futures are lower across the board, ES -0.5%, though magnitudes are more contained than their European peers as participants look to a heavy data-docket ahead and Fed speak incl. Powell later in the week.

Top European News

  • ECB Rate-Hike Bets for 2022 Put on Ice Amid Russia Fallout
  • Man Group Assets Hit a New High as Clients Add $13.7 Billion
  • U.K. Mortgage Approvals Rise to 74k in Jan. Vs. Est. 72k
  • TotalEnergies Says It Won’t Invest in Any New Russia Projects

In FX, it has been a very choppy start to March in FX circles as safe havens climb amidst a further deterioration in Russia-Ukraine sentiment. However, petro and commodity currencies derive protection from strength in underlying prices as WTI and Brent top Usd 99/bbl and Usd 102/bbl respectively. Franc mixed following retreat vs Dollar and test of key Fib retracement level against underperforming Euro – Usd /Chf back up near 0.9200, DXY close to 97.000, but Eur/Chf sub 1.0300 after dip through 1.0250. Rouble hands back some recovery gains as Russian officials maintain that Ukraine mission will continue until objectives met – Usd/Rub around 96.8000 vs sub-89.5000 low.

In commodities, WTI and Brent are bolstered as geopolitics continue to dominate newsflow, Brent May’22 above USD 102/bbl at best, ahead of Wednesday’s OPEC+ meeting. IEA extraordinary ministerial meeting on the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on oil supply will take place at 13:00-15:00GMT/08:00-10:00EST, according to the Japanese Industry Ministry. Russian President Putin discussed the OPEC+ deal with the Abu Dhabi crown prince, according to Reuters citing Tass; reminder, the JTC commences today from 12:00GMT/07:00EST. IOG committed to sell its share of output from Elgood Gasfield to Gazprom unit for two years, according to FT. Yamal-Europe pipeline has stopped after shipping gas westwards to Germany overnight, preliminary bids have emerged to ship gas eastwards from Germany to Poland through the pipeline, according to Reuters citing Gascade data; subsequently, the pipeline has resumed eastbound flows. Spot gold and silver are supported in-line with haven assets as risk-sentiment sours while base-metals, such as Nickel, are bid on potential Russian supply risks.

US Event Calendar

  • Feb. Wards Total Vehicle Sales, est. 14.4m, prior 15m
  • 9:45am: Feb. Markit US Manufacturing PMI, est. 57.5, prior 57.5
  • 10am: Jan. Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.1%, prior 0.2%
  • 10am: Feb. ISM Manufacturing, est. 58.0, prior 57.6
    • Employment, est. 54.2, prior 54.5
    • New Orders, est. 56.3, prior 57.9
    • Prices Paid, est. 77.5, prior 76.1

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/01/2022 – 07:51

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2NI3bg7 Tyler Durden

Germany Goes For Full Energy Policy Overhaul Amid Ukraine Crisis

Germany Goes For Full Energy Policy Overhaul Amid Ukraine Crisis

By Tsvetana Paraskova of OilPrice.com

The Russian invasion of Ukraine upended the energy policy of Germany. In just a few days since Putin decided to invade Ukraine, Europe’s biggest economy – heavily dependent on Russian pipeline gas and the end point of another project to receive natural gas from Russia – has suspended the new pipeline project and said no energy source is off the table when it comes to ensuring German energy security.

Early last week, hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin recognized two separatist regions in eastern Ukraine and deployed troops there, Germany suspended Nord Stream 2, the Russia-led natural gas pipeline project. 

“We now have to reassess the dramatically changed situation: This also applies to Nord Stream 2,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said last Tuesday, adding that “The certification cannot take place now.” 

Since last Tuesday, however, the crisis escalated into a full-blown Russian invasion of Ukraine. The European Union and the United States scrambled to draft sanctions against Russia and Putin in such a way so as not to disrupt Russian oil and gas exports, a large part of which go to Europe. And European countries, including the biggest economy in Europe, Germany, outlined new measures in their own domestic energy policies to wean themselves off Russian energy dependence. 

The Russian war in Ukraine placed that dependence in sharp relief – the West wants to punish Putin with the harshest possible sanctions, but it has been reluctant to slap sanctions on Russian oil and gas exports.  

Some European countries realized that having one predominant supplier of gas (or any other commodity) is not a sustainable energy policy, especially in light of the green policies that have led to pledges for phasing out coal in a few years. 

In a major change, of course, Germany – which had argued until a few months ago that it is looking at the purely commercial benefits it would gain from Nord Stream 2 – is now not only putting the project on ice, but it is also supporting the construction of two terminals to import liquefied natural gas (LNG) and is not leaving any energy source – not even coal or nuclear – off the table. 

“We will change course in order to eliminate our dependence on imports from individual energy suppliers,” Chancellor Scholz said on Sunday at Parliament, which had convened to discuss the war in Ukraine. 

“After all, the events of recent days and weeks have shown us that responsible, forward-looking energy policy is not just crucial for our economy and our climate. It is also crucial for our security,” he added.

Germany will build two LNG import facilities, at Brunsbuettel and Wilhelmshaven, the chancellor said. 

The German government has asked energy group Uniper to reconsider its plans for an LNG terminal construction at Wilhelmshaven – plans that the company shelved two years ago because of poor economics, German business daily Handelsblatt reported on Sunday, citing sources familiar with the matter. 

Apart from two LNG terminals, Germany plans to boost the volumes of its natural gas storage and will purchase more gas on the global market in consultation with the EU, Chancellor Scholz said. Coal reserves will also be boosted, he added. 

No energy source is “taboo” in the new German energy strategy to move away from Russian gas dependence, said economy minister Robert Habeck, a member of the Green Party. 

Before Putin’s war in Ukraine, Germany planned to switch off all its remaining nuclear power generators by the end of 2022, while it also looked to retire a large portion of its coal-fired capacity fleet between 2022 and 2024. The country has said it would aim to phase out coal by 2030 – eight years ahead of earlier plans. 

Extending the operation of the remaining nuclear power plants or phasing out coal later than 2030 are options currently under discussion, the minister said. 

“There are no taboos on deliberations,” regarding Germany’s energy policy from now on, Habeck told German television ARD on Sunday. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/01/2022 – 07:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Hm1tDrR Tyler Durden

Why Can’t We Build Anything?


topicsfuture

“We’re going to fix them all,” President Joe Biden vowed, awkwardly showing up to give a speech promoting his $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill just hours after Pittsburgh’s Fern Hollow Bridge collapsed in January. “We’re sending the money.”

It is true that the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act includes $40 billion in funding to improve the nation’s 43,000 bridges, though that’s a relatively small amount compared to the $156 billion it includes for mass transit and rail (on top of the $70 billion that went to mass transit in pandemic relief), plus the hundreds of billions in additional spending on broadband, green energy, and other stuff that only looks like infrastructure if you squint.

But it’s not true that Washington is actually “sending the money.” Because of Congress’ longstanding inability to perform one of its most basic functions—pass a budget—significant swathes of transportation spending are stalled at 2020 levels. In November, the infrastructure bill did indeed authorize over a trillion in spending. But before all of that money can actually head out the door, there needs to be an appropriations bill in place as well.

Carlos Monje, the undersecretary for policy at the Transportation Department, explained in late January that “the department has begun to move forward on as many aspects of the bill as we can, but some programs are hampered by legislative challenges resulting from the constraints that are in the continuing resolution.”

The infrastructure law theoretically dumped $118 billion into the Highway Trust Fund, which can no longer cover all of its spending from gas tax revenue, for example. But under the current continuing resolution (C.R.)—the stopgap budget measure Congress passes when it can’t get its act together to do a proper annual budget—that money can only be spent at 2020 levels, which means there’s about $9 billion for roads and $3 billion for transit stuck in limbo. That C.R. is set to expire right as this magazine reaches readers, potentially triggering a broad shutdown that would, of course, slow all government functions to a crawl, including infrastructure projects.

It’s also not true that “we’re going to fix them all” even when the money does start flowing. The Fern Hollow Bridge was not on the list of projects to be funded by the new infrastructure bill, even though its condition had been rated “poor” for years. Its absence from the federal list isn’t unreasonable: Pennsylvania drivers already pay the nation’s third-highest gasoline tax, at just over $0.58 per gallon. But a 2019 audit found that $4.2 billion in gas tax revenue that could have been used to repair roads and bridges had been drained off over six years to fund the state police. Meanwhile, a 2017 estimate of the cost to repair the bridge came in at a manageable $1.3 million.

Fern Hollow is a microcosm of a larger problem. The issue has never been a lack of funds for infrastructure; it’s that the money flows unpredictably from multiple sources and then frequently ends up getting spent on something else via a heavily politicized decision-making process.

There’s also the question of why building anything, but especially infrastructure, in the United States costs so much and takes so long. The U.S. is the sixth-most expensive country in the world to build rapid-rail transit infrastructure like the New York City subway or the Washington, D.C., metro system.

Part of the reason is just plain waste and corruption. The federal infrastructure bill has created massive incentives for rent-seeking while ballooning the municipal lobbying sector. Like contestants on a game show, states and localities are scrambling for dollars, correctly understanding that this might be the only major windfall in this area for a decade or more—again, largely due to Congress’ inability to do its job in a predictable way in concert with a chief executive who can set clear achievable policy priorities.

More than 1,000 municipal entities spent just shy of $50 million on federal lobbyists in the second half of 2021 as the infrastructure bill was finalized and passed, according to data tracked by OpenSecrets. That’s about 7 percent higher than the $46.7 million that municipal entities spent in the same period of 2020, which was hardly a dry spell given the federal pandemic spending that was already underway. That number likely underestimates the real demand, since it doesn’t capture contracts signed right at the end of the year.

In theory, no lobbyist is needed to tap into the new infrastructure money. At the end of January, Mitch Landrieu, a former mayor of New Orleans who is overseeing infrastructure spending for the Biden administration, proudly announced the existence of a 465-page guidebook that explains the different pots of money available to communities, along with a data file that is—get this—searchable!

Despite all this, there’s no reason to think the U.S. is notably worse on these measures than other developed nations. Likewise, while some of the cost is inputs, such as material and labor, they don’t explain the disparity fully. A recent study of the interstate highway system from George Washington University professor Leah Brooks and Yale University professor Zachary Liscow suggests that the X-factor is “citizen voice,” which can take the form of legitimate opposition to eminent domain, or which might be less charitably described as “not in my backyard” obstructionism and environmental regulatory foot dragging.

During the interminable negotiations over the bill, Republicans actually tried to untangle some of the green tape with what they called the “One Federal Decision” framework, which streamlines approval for projects reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act and places a 90-day limit on lead agencies’ final decision making. But there’s always a reason to pull a project out of the fast-track category. A post-passage January memo, for instance, clarifies that any project requiring a new right of way is ineligible for the streamlined review process.

This is hardly a new problem. Eli Dourado, a policy analyst at the Center for Growth and Opportunity at Utah State, told The Week that infrastructure projects funded by then-President Barack Obama’s 2009 stimulus were subject to nearly 200,000 environmental reviews.

And these regulations hamper all projects, not just classic bridge, road, and rail spending. The infrastructure bill actually cleared the way for companies building high-speed vacuum-based hyperloop tunnel projects to become eligible for federal funding, creating a Non-Traditional and Emerging Transportation Technology Council at the Department of Transportation to “support the safe deployment of the transportation system.” While that might sound like an encouraging development for those who are excited about innovations in transportation, anyone who knows how the process really works will find the regulatory jargon above ominous, to say the least.

In this, as in so many other sectors distorted by government spending and regulation, the best hope may lie outside of traditional answers. Perhaps jetpacks will let us skip over the decaying bridges.

Infrastructure is broadly considered one of the least controversial functions of government, just as budgeting is one of the most basic functions of Congress. The messy fate of Biden’s long-awaited bipartisan bill is a reminder that the federal government is so far from getting even these fundamentals right that it certainly shouldn’t be trusted with higher-order functions, and that all of us should be thinking about ways to work around state dysfunction given our limited prospects for improving the current expensive, broken system.

The post Why Can't We Build Anything? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/W0O2ljk
via IFTTT