Michigan Secretary Of State Loses Round In Fight Over Dead People On Voter Rolls

Michigan Secretary Of State Loses Round In Fight Over Dead People On Voter Rolls

Authored by Steven Kovac via The Epoch Times,

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has failed to convince a judge to dismiss a case that could force the state to remove 25,975 deceased people from its voter rolls.

Benson moved for dismissal of a case brought against her in November 2021 by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) for her failure to clean up the state’s voter registration rolls—in an alleged violation of Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

On Aug. 25, Benson’s motion to dismiss the case was denied by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The court also denied the motions to intervene filed by the Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute, the Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans, and Rise Inc.

Additionally, PILF’s suit seeks to force Benson to provide documentation of her efforts to remove deceased registrants from the voter rolls, something she has thus far also failed to do.

Names of 25,975 Deceased Voters

PILF notified Benson of the problem in September 2020 and again in November 2020, a year before it filed its lawsuit.

The foundation provided Benson with the names of 25,975 voters who had died but were still on Michigan’s voter rolls, as were discovered by its research. Of these, 23,663 registrants had been dead for five years or more, and 17,449 had been dead for at least a decade.

The study found that 3,956 registrants had been dead for at least 20 years.

PILF president J. Christian Adams said in a statement about the 2021 case:

“For over a year, we shared specific data with the Michigan Secretary of State’s Office about the alarming problem of deceased registrants on Michigan’s voter rolls.

“Secretary Benson has done nothing to resolve the problem and is even refusing to hand over public documents related to these failures.

“The failure to remove deceased registrants creates an opportunity for fraud and makes Michigan’s elections less secure.

“This case is about ensuring that deceased registrants are not receiving ballots.”

Commenting on the current legal victory, Adams said in an Aug. 25 statement, “This initial win is the first step.”

“It’s astonishing that Secretary Benson is so vigorously opposing effective list maintenance,” he added.

Adams called it “remarkable” that, after PILF shared its data with Benson in 2020, dead people remain on Michigan’s voter rolls.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/29/2022 – 14:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/q2gzL06 Tyler Durden

A Benefit Of Soaring Inflation: Americans Are Starting To Eat Less

A Benefit Of Soaring Inflation: Americans Are Starting To Eat Less

While the Dallas Fed is traditionally a C, or at best a B-grade economic indicator, it is best known for having some of the most entertaining and insightful critiques of the Biden regime, such as the following:

  • “We’ll all be lucky to have a job with two more years of this disaster.”

  • “You can’t ignore the economic fundamentals leading to a likely recession, and the administration [in Washington] is either stubborn or as paralyzed as a deer in headlights”

  • “Government overspending and transfer  programs have inflated the money supply while resulting in unchecked corruption  and waste. We will be paying that bill for generations, and what a colossal  waste of resources and missed opportunity.”

  • “Everything we buy and sell comes and  goes by truck, if we can get a truck at any price. Inflation will continue  until the country is self-sufficient in oil and gas. The current political  policy may not change until 2024. Therefore, inflation will be our consistent  companion for a while, then stagflation!”

  • “We see the environment for the oil  industry becoming even worse than the previous months. Biden is promoting a  very caustic attitude toward the oil industry, which doesn’t help the country  in any way.”

We bring it up because today we got the latest monthly update from the Dallas Fed Manufacturing Activity survey, which came in largely as expected at -12.9 (exp -12.7) and well above last month’s catastrophic -22.6.

And while there was the usual stabs at the Biden admin among the various respondents to the August survey…

  • The Biden administration, Congress and the Federal Reserve are on a negative path for the economy.

  • We are on the verge of losing confidence for the rest of the year.

… the one response that was probably the most informative this month did not have to do with Texans’ views of Biden but rather how the food industry is changing as a result of soaring food prices. What we learned is that one of the fringe benefits of the inflation surge is that for once, Americans are actually eating less!

We are seeing moderate (-2 percent to -4 percent) decreases in volume, which is a shift from our historical volume trends (+6 percent).

Less remarkable, but more amusing is that in addition to eating less, American consumers are trading down, much to the chagrin of “organic beef sausage.”

Consumer behavior is shifting to lower-priced items in our category as they struggle with inflation. We see particular stress in our highest-end products, notably our organic beef sausage, as consumers trade down.

Finally, the good news for US food companies is that as always, high prices are the cure for high prices, and as volumes shrink, corporations are starting to cut prices…

We see strong consumer response to promotions, which is driving up costs. We are currently recasting our volume forecast to align with this reality and believe that we can hit our financial targets for the year with increased operational efficiencies.

… which means a return to normalcy is in store, but not before a major hit to profit margins over the next several quarters.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/29/2022 – 14:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/pVUIjqx Tyler Durden

Peter Schiff: Student Loan Forgiveness Is Pure Inflation

Peter Schiff: Student Loan Forgiveness Is Pure Inflation

Via SchiffGold.com,

Last week, President Joe Biden announced a student loan forgiveness scheme. Peter Schiff appeared on NewsMax Real America with Dan Ball to talk about the cost of forgiving student debt and the growing recession.

Peter said that despite all of the claims to the contrary, this is just going to add to the inflation problem.

Biden claims that forgiving $300 billion in student debt won’t impact inflation. How is that going to work? Peter said it won’t. In fact, this is pure inflation.

All the money that students are not going to repay to the government, the government is just going to print. The Federal Reserve is going to print that money because this is like a giant tax cut for certain Americans because the government is not going to get the money that it was going to receive from the repayment of those loans.”

So, where will the government get the money? There are no spending cuts. The end result has to be more inflation.

Peter also pointed out the moral hazard inherent in this scheme. Moral hazard means a lack of incentive to guard against risk because people are protected from the consequences.

Remember, the only reason we have all these student loans is because the government provided them or guaranteed them. The only reason college is so expensive is because the government provides so much money in the way of loans. But now that they start forgiving loans, students are going to borrow more money than ever before. Because the colleges are going to tell the students, ‘Hey, who cares how much you borrow for college? You’re not going to have to pay any of it back anyway. So, we’re going to double your tuition, and don’t worry. Maybe we’ll throw in a free car.”

Meanwhile, people who were thinking about paying off student loans won’t do it.

Why would you want to pay for something when the government says, ‘Don’t pay for it. It’s going to be free!’? You’re a sucker if you pay. Everybody is going to borrow the money on the chance that the loan is going to be forgiven.”

Looking at the broader economy, Dan Ball noted that the housing market continues to crash. It’s clear the economy is slowing. And Joe Biden’s solution was simply to redefine recession. Peter emphasized that we are already in a recession.

Next year, maybe they’ll be calling it a depression. Or, they’ll be denying that as well. But I think that’s what it’s more likely to be. But it’s also an inflationary depression because inflation is going to get worse, not just because they’re making it worse with student debt forgiveness or more aid to Ukraine. As the economy ultimately implodes, they’re going to try to stimulate it. In fact, I think the reason they want to extend the moratorium on student loans is because they want to get through the next election — the midterms. They want to make sure the voters vote for the guys who gave them out a freebie. Well, also what’s going to be happening is the economy is going to be getting a lot worse and there’s going to be a lot of political pressure on the Federal Reserve to turn its attention from inflation to try to do something to prop up a weak economy.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/29/2022 – 13:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xeu9K4O Tyler Durden

“Very Worried” Liz Warren Slams Powell, Says Rate-Hikes Will Push “Millions Of People Out Of Work”

“Very Worried” Liz Warren Slams Powell, Says Rate-Hikes Will Push “Millions Of People Out Of Work”

Maybe Socialist Democrat senator Elizabeth Warren simply chose not to not listen to Jerome Powell on Friday when Chairman “Doom” explicitly warned that fighting inflation will “bring some pain”, not to mention millions of layoffs during the upcoming period of slow economic growth as the Federal Reserve raises interest rates to fight the high inflation it unleashed in the past two years when it erroneously said that inflation would be transitory, but over the weekend the outspoken “native American” echoed her most recent Humphrey Hawkins head-to-head with Powell (whom she hates since day one), and said that she is “very worried” that the Fed was going to tip the nation’s economy into recession and that interest rate hikes would put people out of work.

“Do you know what’s worse than high prices and a strong economy? It’s high prices and millions of people out of work. I am very worried that the Fed is going to tip this economy into recession,” Warren told CNN on Sunday.

Well, of course the Fed is going to tip this economy into recession: Powell could not be any clearer that is precisely what the Fed plans on doing next (just as this weekend’s Jackson Hole symposium made it clear that central bankers plan on pushing the entire world into a coordinated recession). Powell’s clarity has only been matched by that of Democrats – with Warren at the helm (since Biden has completely lost touch with reality and has zero understanding of what is going on at any given moment) – who have made it just a clear they will blame Powell for the coming recession.

“What he calls ‘some pain’ means putting people out of work, shutting down small business because the cost of money goes up because the interest rates go up,” said Warren, whose views on the economy are often influential among progressive Democrats.

Shockingly, Warren was actually right when she agreed with what we have been saying for the past year, namely that inflation was high partly due to supply chain problems, the COVID-19 pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine.

“There is nothing in raising the interest rates, nothing in Jerome Powell’s tool bag, that deals directly with those and he has admitted as much in congressional hearings,” Warren said.

Warren’s criticism of Powell was also apt, if not for the reasons she mentioned, but for reasons addressed by Rabobank’s Michael Every addressed overnight:

If J-Hole produced brave and intellectually honest assessments it would have said rates are only part of the solution to this economic war, which the IMF and World Bank implied. Moreover, if we have a 2% CPI target, why can’t we have a median wage target; a productivity target; a target for the % of GDP accounted for by industry; for spare capacity in critical areas; share of imports in key sectors; and trade concentration? (Of course, you won’t hear any of that!)

Logically, we need sustained higher rates to: crush dead/fictitious credit/capital; push down the price of commodities paying for the other side’s war-machine and claiming to back new dollar rivals; and to suck Western capital out of rival economies to pump it into more geopolitically-friendly alternative destinations. This will blow up the dead/fictitious credit/capital without incentivising investment in what we most need: many important things *lose* money, but we all lose without them. ‘Billions’ won’t do that job, and if ESG could we wouldn’t be worrying about boiling, freezing, starving, or the inability to do any fighting.

Assuming nobody will pay higher taxes –because the rich won’t, and the poor can’t– then that logically leaves only two paths.

  • First is MMT, yet even that theory says don’t print when inflation is high. The American Mind article added, “we know what happens when we allow the boundless desires of politicians to become the basis of credit creation.” And President Biden just gave students debt relief of $10-$20,000 owed to rich, rentier private universities specialised in the dead/fictitious because of a “Midterm Covid emergency”: even the Washington Post calls it “a regressive, expensive mistake [which] will provide a windfall for the upper-middle class and wealthy – with American taxpayers footing the bill.” Yet MMT **only** into live/productive credit/capital areas such as agriculture, energy, industry, infrastructure, and defence , and into local/bloc supply chains not imports, might work, even if it means more inflation now. That is de facto industrial policy and Bretton Woods-era credit rationing to reallocate scarce resources and maintain social stability, if central banks read their own history. (And isn’t the ECB starting down this path with its anti-fragmentation policy? All it needs it state supply-side spending now.)
  • Second is to force private capital to do the things society desperately needs by narrowing its horizons. That means: telling banks what to do; high tariffs; capital controls; credit rationing; and moral suasion like under China’s “Common Prosperity”. Any Western takers?

Both paths lead to a bloc/values-based neo-mercantilism: thus the IMF and World Bank silence. Both are inflationary short-term and mean higher base inflation long-term. Today the Financial Times says “A post-dollar world is coming”. I will take the other side of that bet, while agreeing the can-still-soar-higher-than-this US dollar won’t be used in certain balkanized parts of the world ahead – and good luck to them with their choice of replacement.

Finally, it is unfortunate that there was little discussion on the reality that the US is already in a recession, which however the NBER won’t admit until just a few hours after November’s midterms.

As for Powell sparking a recession, nothing there that we haven’t already covered and as we discussed previously – all those claiming there will be no Fed pivot, let’s readdress after the BLS reveals that the US has lost a few hundred thousand jobs in one month and it becomes the biggest political talking point. Powell will pivot so fast, heads will spin.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/29/2022 – 13:29

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Hjrx9kc Tyler Durden

Made-In-America EV-Battery Production? Metals Needed Suggest No Time Soon

Made-In-America EV-Battery Production? Metals Needed Suggest No Time Soon

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Despite tax credits and incentives, it will be very difficult, and costly, to bring electric vehicle battery production to the US.

China currently assembles 76% of the world’s batteries.

Materials needed for the batteries are mostly outside the US.

The Wall Street Journal has an interesting video article Taking Apart an EV Battery Illustrates Why ‘Made in America’ Will Be Tough

I believe that is a non-paywalled link.

President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act calls for at least 50% of an electric vehicle’s battery to be made in the U.S. to qualify for a federal discount.

WSJ’s George Downs breaks down a battery to explain why that’s going to be a challenge.

California Bans Gasoline in New Car Sales by 2035

And with virtually no discussion of the implications, nor any feasible plans to deliver the mandateCalifornia Demands More Inflation, Bans Gasoline in New Car Sales by 2035

This is one hell of a let’s do it and see what happens mandate!

I can guarantee one thing, it will add to inflation, and likely in far more ways than we now understand. 

The inflationary polices of Progressives in blue states, coupled with inflationary madness by president Biden, will put the Fed on hold for any recession (stagflation) fighting efforts.

Good luck with that for the stock market. 

*  *  *

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/29/2022 – 13:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/PH3Sxnq Tyler Durden

Young Adults Used Pot and Psychedelics in Record Numbers Last Year, While Adolescent Drug Use Fell Sharply


cannabis-leaves-20-MIS-Photography

Drug use fell sharply among teenagers last year while rising among young adults, according to a government-sponsored survey. The drop in adolescent drug use, which may be largely due to pandemic-related disruptions, was the biggest ever recorded in the 46 years since the Monitoring the Future (MTF) Study began surveying high school students. Meanwhile, marijuana and psychedelic use reached all-time highs among 19-to-30-year-olds, whom the survey has covered since 1988.

Those contrasting trends are striking in light of the assumption that teenagers tend to emulate young adults. They confirm that the ongoing collapse of marijuana prohibition, contrary to the warnings of legalization’s opponents, has not boosted underage cannabis consumption. Nor has recent interest in the benefits of psychedelics, which has been accompanied by moves toward decriminalization and legalization, had any discernible impact on adolescent use of such drugs.

Last week, the University of Michigan, where researchers conduct the annual MTF survey under contract with the National Institute on Drug Abuse, reported that “marijuana and hallucinogen use in the past year reported by young adults 19 to 30 years old increased significantly in 2021 compared to five and 10 years ago, reaching historic highs in this age group since 1988.” The prevalence of past-month marijuana use by young adults, which has been rising since 2010, was 28.5 percent in 2021, more than twice as high as the lows recorded in the early 1990s. The prevalence of past-year psychedelic use, which has been rising since 2012, was 8.1 percent in 2021, nearly three times the low reported in 1989.

The picture for teenagers looks quite different. The MTF survey includes students in eighth, 10th, and 12th grades. Among 12th-graders, who have been surveyed since 1976, the prevalence of past-month marijuana use peaked at 37.1 percent in 1978 and had fallen to 21.1 percent by 2020. Among 10th-graders, who have been surveyed since 1991, that rate peaked at 20.5 percent in 1997 and had fallen to 16.6 percent by 2020. Among eighth-graders, who likewise have been included since 1991, the rate peaked at 11.3 percent in 1996 and had fallen to 6.5 percent by 2020. Last year, the prevalence of past-month marijuana use fell to 19.5 percent among 12th-graders, 10.1 percent among 10th-graders, and 4.1 percent among eighth-graders. Those numbers were the lowest recorded since the early 1990s.

In all three grades, the prevalence of past-year psychedelic use peaked in 2001, when the rate was 3.4 percent among eighth-graders, 6.2 percent among 10th-graders, and 9.3 percent among 12th-graders. Last year, those rates fell to 4.1 percent, 2.2 percent, and 1 percent, respectively, the lowest ever recorded.

“The percentage of youth who had ever used any illicit drug other than marijuana decreased by more than 25% in 2021,” a University of Michigan press release noted in December. The drop was 27 percent among 12th-graders, 31 percent among 10th-graders, and 30 percent among eighth-graders. The one-year decline was three times larger than the previous record for 12th-graders, more than twice as large as the previous record for 10th-graders, and 50 percent larger than the previous record for eighth-graders.

Richard Miech, the principal MTF investigator, attributed those historic drops to the COVID-19 pandemic. “Among the many disruptions adolescents have experienced as a result of the pandemic are disruptions in their ability to get drugs, disruptions in their ability to use drugs outside of parental supervision, and disruptions in peer groups that encourage drug use,” he said in December. “As a result, this year, it appears that a sizable portion of adolescents have not used drugs who otherwise may have done so.”

Miech said it is not clear whether the 2021 declines will “stick with these cohorts as they age.” While “it is possible that this delayed onset of drug use will lower these adolescents’ levels of drug use for the rest of their lives,” he said, “it is also possible that these declines will be fleeting, and drug use may surge among these adolescents once they are free of the constraints imposed by the pandemic.”

Miech is probably right that school closures and other disruptions associated with the pandemic made it harder for teenagers to obtain drugs and evade parental supervision while reducing their exposure to peers who might encourage drug use. In all three grades, perceived availability of marijuana and LSD was substantially lower in 2021 than it was before the pandemic.

Yet young adults experienced similar disruptions, which did not stop them from consuming marijuana and psychedelics in record numbers. Perhaps that was because they already had a taste for these drugs, did not have to worry about evading parental supervision, and could more easily overcome pandemic-related limits on social interaction.

In any case, the pandemic does not explain why past-month psychedelic use rose slightly or remained about the same among teenagers in 2020, when more schools were closed than in 2021. Nor does it explain the long-term decline in adolescent marijuana use. Among 12th-graders, for example, past-month marijuana use has gone up and down during the last few decades, but it has never approached the levels recorded in the late 1970s and early ’80s. Since 2012, when Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational use, that rate has never risen above the level recorded that year.

That is not what prohibitionists predicted would happen as more and more states allowed medical or recreational use of marijuana. Those policies, they warned, would boost underage consumption by decreasing teenagers’ wariness of marijuana and making the drug easier to obtain through leakage from the adult market.

MTF survey results provide some evidence to support that first expectation. Since 2012, the percentage of 12th-graders who think cannabis consumption poses a “great risk” has declined substantially. So has the percentage who express disapproval of marijuana use. But those drops continued preexisting trends, and so far they have not translated into increased marijuana use by teenagers.

What about the fear that legalization would expand underage access to marijuana via older friends or relatives who buy it from state-licensed shops? It looks like that effect has not been extensive enough to outweigh the impact of displacing the black market, which makes it harder for teenagers to obtain marijuana directly, since licensed retailers check IDs to verify that buyers are 21 or older. Studies of states that have legalized marijuana for medical or recreational use generally have not found that such reforms are associated with increases in underage consumption.

The post Young Adults Used Pot and Psychedelics in Record Numbers Last Year, While Adolescent Drug Use Fell Sharply appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/oX2Nv7V
via IFTTT

New Yorkers Under 21 Can’t Buy Whipped Cream Cans


A can of whipped cream

As a baby-faced 22-year-old, I know I can expect to get carded every time I enter a bar or try to buy alcohol at the grocery store. Even when my similarly-aged friends aren’t stopped by the bouncer or the waitress at brunch, I’ll have to dig through my purse and fork over my driver’s license, watching it get examined for the umpteenth time.

I can now expect the same rigmarole if I try to buy a can of whipped cream in New York.

Why is there an age limit for purchasing a dessert topping? Because the cans, also known as whippets, contain nitrous oxide, also known as laughing gas, so you can use them to get a brief high. And this prompted New York’s State Assembly to pass one of the strangest bills of the drug war.

Since November 2021, it has been illegal for anyone under 21 to buy a canister of whipped cream in New York—though the law was little-known until a photo from an Albany convenience store alerting customers to the policy change started spreading online last week. Selling whipped cream canisters to anyone under 21 is a civil offense in the state, earning offenders a $250 fee for the first offense and a $500 fee for every subsequent offense.

“Used whippits piling up in our communities are not only an eye sore but also indicative of a significant nitrous oxide abuse problem. This law will help to protect our youth from the dangers of this lethal chemical while helping to clean up our neighborhoods,” the bill’s sponsor, Joseph P. Addabbo Jr., explained right after the bill passed. “Nitrous oxide is a legal chemical for legitimate professional use but when used improperly, it can be extremely lethal.”

The evidence for the dangers of whippits is iffy. The main risk is asphyxiation from breathing in too much nitrous oxide and not enough air. But nitrous deaths almost always happen when people breathe in the gas through a mask, similarly to how laughing gas is administered at the dentist. Nitrous inhalers have also been known to die when using some other means to restrict their access to oxygen, such as putting a plastic bag over their head.

“When people pass out, they’ll drop the balloon or whatever and start breathing air,” Matthew Howard, an inhalant abuse expert at the University of North Carolina, told Vice in 2016. “If you’ve got a gas mask on, you won’t.”

Those who seriously abuse the substance can also develop subacute combined degeneration, a degeneration of the spinal cord due to vitamin B12 deficiency. But when treated quickly with a B12 injection, most affected by the condition will make a full recovery. Despite Addabbo’s fearmongering, nitrous oxide rarely poses a long-term health risk—especially when inhaled from a whipped cream can rather than an industrial tank.

Further, whippits don’t appear to be a particularly popular drug among teens. According to a 2015 study from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, only 0.4 percent of 12- to 17-year-olds reported having done whippits in the past year. If used whipped cream cans are littering the streets of New York state, the under-21s aren’t necessarily the ones to blame.

It is unclear how much this bill will impact whippit use. The small number of teenagers who actually want to get high off nitrous oxide will probably just purchase other household items that contain nitrous oxide canisters, such as sprayable cooking oil. Or they’ll buy cheap nitrous oxide canisters online. And if you’re one of the 99.6 percent of teens who don’t get high this way? Then you just might need to pick a different ice cream topping.

The post New Yorkers Under 21 Can't Buy Whipped Cream Cans appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/D2ycItz
via IFTTT

Young Adults Used Pot and Psychedelics in Record Numbers Last Year, While Adolescent Drug Use Fell Sharply


cannabis-leaves-20-MIS-Photography

Drug use fell sharply among teenagers last year while rising among young adults, according to a government-sponsored survey. The drop in adolescent drug use, which may be largely due to pandemic-related disruptions, was the biggest ever recorded in the 46 years since the Monitoring the Future (MTF) Study began surveying high school students. Meanwhile, marijuana and psychedelic use reached all-time highs among 19-to-30-year-olds, whom the survey has covered since 1988.

Those contrasting trends are striking in light of the assumption that teenagers tend to emulate young adults. They confirm that the ongoing collapse of marijuana prohibition, contrary to the warnings of legalization’s opponents, has not boosted underage cannabis consumption. Nor has recent interest in the benefits of psychedelics, which has been accompanied by moves toward decriminalization and legalization, had any discernible impact on adolescent use of such drugs.

Last week, the University of Michigan, where researchers conduct the annual MTF survey under contract with the National Institute on Drug Abuse, reported that “marijuana and hallucinogen use in the past year reported by young adults 19 to 30 years old increased significantly in 2021 compared to five and 10 years ago, reaching historic highs in this age group since 1988.” The prevalence of past-month marijuana use by young adults, which has been rising since 2010, was 28.5 percent in 2021, more than twice as high as the lows recorded in the early 1990s. The prevalence of past-year psychedelic use, which has been rising since 2012, was 8.1 percent in 2021, nearly three times the low reported in 1989.

The picture for teenagers looks quite different. The MTF survey includes students in eighth, 10th, and 12th grades. Among 12th-graders, who have been surveyed since 1976, the prevalence of past-month marijuana use peaked at 37.1 percent in 1978 and had fallen to 21.1 percent by 2020. Among 10th-graders, who have been surveyed since 1991, that rate peaked at 20.5 percent in 1997 and had fallen to 16.6 percent by 2020. Among eighth-graders, who likewise have been included since 1991, the rate peaked at 11.3 percent in 1996 and had fallen to 6.5 percent by 2020. Last year, the prevalence of past-month marijuana use fell to 19.5 percent among 12th-graders, 10.1 percent among 10th-graders, and 4.1 percent among eighth-graders. Those numbers were the lowest recorded since the early 1990s.

In all three grades, the prevalence of past-year psychedelic use peaked in 2001, when the rate was 3.4 percent among eighth-graders, 6.2 percent among 10th-graders, and 9.3 percent among 12th-graders. Last year, those rates fell to 4.1 percent, 2.2 percent, and 1 percent, respectively, the lowest ever recorded.

“The percentage of youth who had ever used any illicit drug other than marijuana decreased by more than 25% in 2021,” a University of Michigan press release noted in December. The drop was 27 percent among 12th-graders, 31 percent among 10th-graders, and 30 percent among eighth-graders. The one-year decline was three times larger than the previous record for 12th-graders, more than twice as large as the previous record for 10th-graders, and 50 percent larger than the previous record for eighth-graders.

Richard Miech, the principal MTF investigator, attributed those historic drops to the COVID-19 pandemic. “Among the many disruptions adolescents have experienced as a result of the pandemic are disruptions in their ability to get drugs, disruptions in their ability to use drugs outside of parental supervision, and disruptions in peer groups that encourage drug use,” he said in December. “As a result, this year, it appears that a sizable portion of adolescents have not used drugs who otherwise may have done so.”

Miech said it is not clear whether the 2021 declines will “stick with these cohorts as they age.” While “it is possible that this delayed onset of drug use will lower these adolescents’ levels of drug use for the rest of their lives,” he said, “it is also possible that these declines will be fleeting, and drug use may surge among these adolescents once they are free of the constraints imposed by the pandemic.”

Miech is probably right that school closures and other disruptions associated with the pandemic made it harder for teenagers to obtain drugs and evade parental supervision while reducing their exposure to peers who might encourage drug use. In all three grades, perceived availability of marijuana and LSD was substantially lower in 2021 than it was before the pandemic.

Yet young adults experienced similar disruptions, which did not stop them from consuming marijuana and psychedelics in record numbers. Perhaps that was because they already had a taste for these drugs, did not have to worry about evading parental supervision, and could more easily overcome pandemic-related limits on social interaction.

In any case, the pandemic does not explain why past-month psychedelic use rose slightly or remained about the same among teenagers in 2020, when more schools were closed than in 2021. Nor does it explain the long-term decline in adolescent marijuana use. Among 12th-graders, for example, past-month marijuana use has gone up and down during the last few decades, but it has never approached the levels recorded in the late 1970s and early ’80s. Since 2012, when Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational use, that rate has never risen above the level recorded that year.

That is not what prohibitionists predicted would happen as more and more states allowed medical or recreational use of marijuana. Those policies, they warned, would boost underage consumption by decreasing teenagers’ wariness of marijuana and making the drug easier to obtain through leakage from the adult market.

MTF survey results provide some evidence to support that first expectation. Since 2012, the percentage of 12th-graders who think cannabis consumption poses a “great risk” has declined substantially. So has the percentage who express disapproval of marijuana use. But those drops continued preexisting trends, and so far they have not translated into increased marijuana use by teenagers.

What about the fear that legalization would expand underage access to marijuana via older friends or relatives who buy it from state-licensed shops? It looks like that effect has not been extensive enough to outweigh the impact of displacing the black market, which makes it harder for teenagers to obtain marijuana directly, since licensed retailers check IDs to verify that buyers are 21 or older. Studies of states that have legalized marijuana for medical or recreational use generally have not found that such reforms are associated with increases in underage consumption.

The post Young Adults Used Pot and Psychedelics in Record Numbers Last Year, While Adolescent Drug Use Fell Sharply appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/oX2Nv7V
via IFTTT

New Yorkers Under 21 Can’t Buy Whipped Cream Cans


A can of whipped cream

As a baby-faced 22-year-old, I know I can expect to get carded every time I enter a bar or try to buy alcohol at the grocery store. Even when my similarly-aged friends aren’t stopped by the bouncer or the waitress at brunch, I’ll have to dig through my purse and fork over my driver’s license, watching it get examined for the umpteenth time.

I can now expect the same rigmarole if I try to buy a can of whipped cream in New York.

Why is there an age limit for purchasing a dessert topping? Because the cans, also known as whippets, contain nitrous oxide, also known as laughing gas, so you can use them to get a brief high. And this prompted New York’s State Assembly to pass one of the strangest bills of the drug war.

Since November 2021, it has been illegal for anyone under 21 to buy a canister of whipped cream in New York—though the law was little-known until a photo from an Albany convenience store alerting customers to the policy change started spreading online last week. Selling whipped cream canisters to anyone under 21 is a civil offense in the state, earning offenders a $250 fee for the first offense and a $500 fee for every subsequent offense.

“Used whippits piling up in our communities are not only an eye sore but also indicative of a significant nitrous oxide abuse problem. This law will help to protect our youth from the dangers of this lethal chemical while helping to clean up our neighborhoods,” the bill’s sponsor, Joseph P. Addabbo Jr., explained right after the bill passed. “Nitrous oxide is a legal chemical for legitimate professional use but when used improperly, it can be extremely lethal.”

The evidence for the dangers of whippits is iffy. The main risk is asphyxiation from breathing in too much nitrous oxide and not enough air. But nitrous deaths almost always happen when people breathe in the gas through a mask, similarly to how laughing gas is administered at the dentist. Nitrous inhalers have also been known to die when using some other means to restrict their access to oxygen, such as putting a plastic bag over their head.

“When people pass out, they’ll drop the balloon or whatever and start breathing air,” Matthew Howard, an inhalant abuse expert at the University of North Carolina, told Vice in 2016. “If you’ve got a gas mask on, you won’t.”

Those who seriously abuse the substance can also develop subacute combined degeneration, a degeneration of the spinal cord due to vitamin B12 deficiency. But when treated quickly with a B12 injection, most affected by the condition will make a full recovery. Despite Addabbo’s fearmongering, nitrous oxide rarely poses a long-term health risk—especially when inhaled from a whipped cream can rather than an industrial tank.

Further, whippits don’t appear to be a particularly popular drug among teens. According to a 2015 study from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, only 0.4 percent of 12- to 17-year-olds reported having done whippits in the past year. If used whipped cream cans are littering the streets of New York state, the under-21s aren’t necessarily the ones to blame.

It is unclear how much this bill will impact whippit use. The small number of teenagers who actually want to get high off nitrous oxide will probably just purchase other household items that contain nitrous oxide canisters, such as sprayable cooking oil. Or they’ll buy cheap nitrous oxide canisters online. And if you’re one of the 99.6 percent of teens who don’t get high this way? Then you just might need to pick a different ice cream topping.

The post New Yorkers Under 21 Can't Buy Whipped Cream Cans appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/D2ycItz
via IFTTT

There Will Be ‘Riots In The Streets’ If Trump Is Prosecuted: Lindsey Graham

There Will Be ‘Riots In The Streets’ If Trump Is Prosecuted: Lindsey Graham

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) says there will “literally be riots in the street” if former President Donald Trump is prosecuted in the wake of the Aug. 8 raid of his Mar-a-Lago compound.

“Most Republicans — including me — believe when it comes to Trump, there is no law. It’s all about getting him,” Graham told Fox News‘ “Sunday Night in America.”

“There is a double standard when it comes to Trump,” he continued, invoking the lack of a raid, or prosecution, when it came to obvious lawbreaking by Hunter Biden and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“And I’ll say this, if there is a prosecution of Donald Trump for mishandling classified information after the Clinton debacle … there will be riots in the streets,” he told host and former Congressman Trey Gowdy, adding that he’s “never been more worried about the law in politics as I am right now.”

“How can you tell a conservative Republican that the system works when it comes to Trump?” Graham asked, noting that the DOJ’s sham probe into the Russiagate hoax was a “joke of an investigation” in which “people lied and manipulated the evidence.”

“Look at what happened to Hunter Biden. They gave him a complete pass, apparently. And social media outlets in this country suppressed information that could have mattered,” Graham continued, according to the Fox News.

And if they try to prosecute President Trump for mishandling classified information after Hillary Clinton set up a server in her basement — there literally will be riots in the street.

Watch:

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/29/2022 – 12:46

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/vcqbOkQ Tyler Durden