Elizabeth Warren’s School Choice Blunder

Elizabeth Warren came out swinging against school choice when she released her education plan on October 21. The Massachusetts senator and Democratic presidential candidate called for ending federal funding for public charter schools, banning for-profit charter schools, increasing regulations for all charter schools, and making it more difficult to start new charter schools. She also said she wanted to stop private school choice programs.

Warren then started tweeting that she was “#PublicSchoolProud” and that “we must stop the privatization of public schools.” She also bragged about how she attended and taught at public schools.

But the senator remained silent about where she sent her children to school. She’d been silent on the subject for a while, in fact, having failed to respond when Education Week asked where her children went to school. If Warren was so loud and proud about public schools, wouldn’t she be more than happy to tell everyone that she sent her two kids, Alex and Amelia, to public schools? Of course she would.

Unless, that is, she had the privilege to send her own kids to private schools while fighting against extending similar options to the less fortunate.

On October 28, using ancestry.com, I discovered a 1987 fifth-grade yearbook photo of “Alex Warren” at Kirby Hall School, an expensive private institution. The school’s current tuition is $17,875, and it is located about half a mile from the University of Texas at Austin, where Warren was teaching at the time. The student’s year of birth—1976—matched Elizabeth Warren’s son’s. 

A few weeks after my discovery, Elizabeth Warren gave a speech in Atlanta about the rights of black women. The November 21 rally was interrupted by a group of black protesters from the Powerful Parent Network, a pro-school-choice group that opposes Warren’s anti-choice education plan. 

After the rally, Warren tried to do the right thing by talking with the protesters. One of the parents, Sunny Thomas, recorded the 17-minute conversation and posted it on Facebook for the world to see. Warren probably regrets two things she said in that recording.

First, she accidentally made a good case against the idea that you can fix education by throwing more money at it, saying: “I told all of my folks back in Massachusetts, ‘You’re going to get an 85 percent raise’ at all of our little-child development centers. You know how much they got? Zero! Somehow it all went to the state government and never made it down!” Somehow, yes.

Second: When a parent told Warren that she “read that your children went to private schools,” Warren quickly responded, “No, my children went to public schools.”

A day later, the Warren campaign told Fox News: “Elizabeth’s daughter went to public school. Her son went to public school until fifth grade.” So, yes, they both went to public schools. It’s just that one of them also went to a private school. To more than one private school, in fact: After the controversy hit, one of Alex Warren’s classmates sent his high school yearbook photo to The Federalist, showing that he attended Haverford School while Elizabeth was teaching at the University of Pennsylvania. Haverford’s high-school tuition and fees are currently set at $39,500.

Warren was so “#PublicSchoolProud” that she decided to send her son Alex to expensive private schools for the majority of his K–12 education. And I don’t blame her! I’m happy they had that option. But maybe Elizabeth Warren shouldn’t fight tooth and nail against extending similar opportunities to poor families.

Since then, Warren has spiraled downward in both the polls and the prediction markets. The latest nationwide survey, from Quinnipiac, shows a 14-point drop from last month. But Warren might be able to regain some ground by actually listening to what a majority of minority families want for their kids: school choice. It also wouldn’t hurt for the senator to try not to mislead people.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2qX7Ou7
via IFTTT

Elizabeth Warren’s School Choice Blunder

Elizabeth Warren came out swinging against school choice when she released her education plan on October 21. The Massachusetts senator and Democratic presidential candidate called for ending federal funding for public charter schools, banning for-profit charter schools, increasing regulations for all charter schools, and making it more difficult to start new charter schools. She also said she wanted to stop private school choice programs.

Warren then started tweeting that she was “#PublicSchoolProud” and that “we must stop the privatization of public schools.” She also bragged about how she attended and taught at public schools.

But the senator remained silent about where she sent her children to school. She’d been silent on the subject for a while, in fact, having failed to respond when Education Week asked where her children went to school. If Warren was so loud and proud about public schools, wouldn’t she be more than happy to tell everyone that she sent her two kids, Alex and Amelia, to public schools? Of course she would.

Unless, that is, she had the privilege to send her own kids to private schools while fighting against extending similar options to the less fortunate.

On October 28, using ancestry.com, I discovered a 1987 fifth-grade yearbook photo of “Alex Warren” at Kirby Hall School, an expensive private institution. The school’s current tuition is $17,875, and it is located about half a mile from the University of Texas at Austin, where Warren was teaching at the time. The student’s year of birth—1976—matched Elizabeth Warren’s son’s. 

A few weeks after my discovery, Elizabeth Warren gave a speech in Atlanta about the rights of black women. The November 21 rally was interrupted by a group of black protesters from the Powerful Parent Network, a pro-school-choice group that opposes Warren’s anti-choice education plan. 

After the rally, Warren tried to do the right thing by talking with the protesters. One of the parents, Sunny Thomas, recorded the 17-minute conversation and posted it on Facebook for the world to see. Warren probably regrets two things she said in that recording.

First, she accidentally made a good case against the idea that you can fix education by throwing more money at it, saying: “I told all of my folks back in Massachusetts, ‘You’re going to get an 85 percent raise’ at all of our little-child development centers. You know how much they got? Zero! Somehow it all went to the state government and never made it down!” Somehow, yes.

Second: When a parent told Warren that she “read that your children went to private schools,” Warren quickly responded, “No, my children went to public schools.”

A day later, the Warren campaign told Fox News: “Elizabeth’s daughter went to public school. Her son went to public school until fifth grade.” So, yes, they both went to public schools. It’s just that one of them also went to a private school. To more than one private school, in fact: After the controversy hit, one of Alex Warren’s classmates sent his high school yearbook photo to The Federalist, showing that he attended Haverford School while Elizabeth was teaching at the University of Pennsylvania. Haverford’s high-school tuition and fees are currently set at $39,500.

Warren was so “#PublicSchoolProud” that she decided to send her son Alex to expensive private schools for the majority of his K–12 education. And I don’t blame her! I’m happy they had that option. But maybe Elizabeth Warren shouldn’t fight tooth and nail against extending similar opportunities to poor families.

Since then, Warren has spiraled downward in both the polls and the prediction markets. The latest nationwide survey, from Quinnipiac, shows a 14-point drop from last month. But Warren might be able to regain some ground by actually listening to what a majority of minority families want for their kids: school choice. It also wouldn’t hurt for the senator to try not to mislead people.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2qX7Ou7
via IFTTT

“OK, Boomer”? Pay The Bills, Support A Family, Then We’ll Talk

“OK, Boomer”? Pay The Bills, Support A Family, Then We’ll Talk

Authored by Dave Huber via The College Fix,

A recent op-ed in the Princeton University student paper The Daily Princetonian takes issue with criticism of the trendy phrase “OK, boomer.”

The expression is sort of a payback for derision of the Millennial Generation, but especially its successor, the centennials (those born in 1996 and after). It’s intended as a judgment of boomers’ alleged mishandling of everything from the economy to the climate.

(In case you’re unaware, “Boomer” is short for “baby boomer,” those born in the post-World War II years of 1946 to 1964. They’re the progeny of the Greatest Generation, aka those who — literally — saved the free world just scant years prior.)

I’ve been subjected to “OK, boomer” here and there even though I’m actually a member of Generation X (if barely). The remark doesn’t bother me in the least; indeed, it gives me a good chuckle since it typically comes from someone who’s never paid a bill, raised a family, or planned and made sacrifices for retirement.

In my experience, centennials like op-ed author Anna McGee are the worst culprits.

You want boomers and Gen Xers to take you seriously?

You forget yours is the generation…

  • Of grade inflation.

  • Of minimal discipline, in and out of school.

  • Of being carted around to sports and social functions by helicopter parents who cater to your every whim.

  • In college, you run and cry to “bias response teams” when the slightest little thing offends you.

  • Then you demand “safe spaces” and other measures to make you feel “welcome” and “wanted” …  like therapy animals, etc.

Not to mention, you want to sell us on the fact that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Greta Thunberg, and the Parkland, Florida activists are heroes of the modern age? That so-called “democratic socialism” is the answer to the country’s ills? People like AOC and Thunberg aren’t “discriminated against” because of their youth, as McGee claims; they’re ridiculed — because they’re stupid. There is a reason, after all, why age restrictions exist in society.

Centennials have more available to them than any other generation before. Even the American “poor” are the envy of the world. Try enjoying it, centennials! Cheer up! The world isn’t going to end in a dozen years because of climate change, and Donald Trump isn’t going to throw you in an internment camp.

Now get off my lawn.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 12/02/2019 – 12:28

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2YaIRYk Tyler Durden

Madrid Opens With “Point Of No Return” Climate Scaremongering… But Where’s Greta?

Madrid Opens With “Point Of No Return” Climate Scaremongering… But Where’s Greta?

After previously finding herself stuck in the wrong place halfway around the world when the United Nations moved its global climate meeting from Chile to Spain, young climate activist Greta Thunberg is running a little late to the Madrid 25th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP25).

Though lacking in creating the same guilt-laced “terror” and panic-laden atmosphere that Greta has proved herself capable of, there was still plenty of climate apocalypse fear mongering during Monday’s opening remarks to kick off the conference sans Greta. UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres declared “the point of no return is no longer over the horizon”.

Greta Thunberg file image. 

Guterres warned that, “In the crucial 12 months ahead, it is essential that we secure more ambitious national commitments — particularly from the main emitters — to immediately start reducing greenhouse gas emissions at a pace consistent to reaching carbon neutrality by 2050.”

“We simply have to stop digging and drilling and take advantage of the vast possibilities offered by renewable energy and nature-based solutions,” he added, though the aging bureaucrat’s words certainly won’t go viral as he can’t work in a tirade or the same level of emotive guff about being forced to miss school.

Speaking of Greta, she’s expected to arrive Tuesday after hitching a boat ride across the Atlantic with an Australian sailing couple. 

“Betrayal of our entire human family” is what we’re facing apparently, says Guterres. But oops, there’s this:

A British yacht skipper’s flight to the US to help Greta Thunberg sail to Portugal has produced the same amount of carbon emissions the voyage hoped to save.

Nikki Henderson, 26, flew to the US from Britain to sail 48-foot catamaran the La Vagabonde… The journey was meant to save approximately two or three tons of carbon dioxide emissions.

But Ms Henderson’s flight from Britain to the US likely produced the same amount of emissions the journey hoped to save, countering Ms Thunberg’s missionThe Times reports.

“As #COP25 has officially been moved from Santiago to Madrid I’ll need some help,” Thunberg tweeted last month when it became apparent she was in the wrong place. “Now I need to find a way to cross the Atlantic in November… If anyone could help me find transport I would be so grateful.”

Greta catches a lift across the ocean with an Australian family, via ABC.net.au. But OOPS!: “British yacht skipper’s flight to the US to help Greta Thunberg sail to Portugal has produced the same amount of carbon emissions the voyage hoped to save.”

But just like the last few summits the conference involving top officials from 197 countries, which aims to drastically cut emissions through passage of agreed upon targets, will likely be big on hyper sensational “the world is ending!” alarmism and light on agreements to ‘reverse course’ etc

This is especially given the political and economic situation marked by ongoing mass protests and upheavals in some dozen countries from Chile to Peru to Catalonia to Paris (Yellow Vests) to Lebanon to Hong Kong to Iraq and more. Given that in terms of the long view the West has in reality barely recovered from the crash of 2008, now is a worse and more fragile time than ever for politicians to attempt to shove down radical green initiatives on their populations. 

Meanwhile, this doesn’t mean pressure won’t continue to build for the US to stay the course on dubious and politically costly efforts like the Paris Agreement. On Monday it was announced that:

Google has joined with 70 other companies and union leaders to call on the US to stay in the Paris Agreement. The letter was signed by the CEOs of Google, Mastercard, Salesforce, Aon, Tata Sons, Disney, Bank of America, Tesla, Microsoft, Adobe, IBM, Goldman Sachs, Verizon and Corning, among many others, and marks the start of the 25th annual United Nations Climate Change Conference.

But as one environmental journalist and author observes, this will likely not get far beyond virtue signaling and moralistic threats and condemnation for those not on board, like the Trump White House.

Image via Reuters.

“There were two main problems with the Paris Agreement,” writes Rob Lyons“First, there is no international mechanism to enforce the targets that countries declare. Beyond domestic laws and ‘peer pressure’ from other countries, there is no penalty for failure.”

Indeed Guterres admitted as much in his opening remarks: “What is still lacking is political will. Political will to put a price on carbon. Political will to stop subsidies on fossil fuels,” the UN chief said.

Hence the importance of adding the fixture of an emotionally manipulative autistic child’s voice which can induce the appropriate level of fear, dread and ‘panic’ over the ‘climate emergency’ that will imminently usher in The End. 


Tyler Durden

Mon, 12/02/2019 – 12:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2DFEv1C Tyler Durden

Free Speech Clinic seeks Fellow Starting 1/2020

I posted this job opportunity a while ago, but we have had to reopen the search. The position is for one and a half years, though there is potentially some wiggle room. The university h.r. bureaucracy has been slow to reopen the position on its website, so I can’t give you a link right now for an official application, but if you are interested, please email me directly at dbernste@gmu.edu and we will take it from there. Salary is commensurate with similar fellowships.

Purpose of the Organization:
The Liberty and Law Center is an academic center within Scalia Law School. Its mission is to provide a forum to learn about the role of law in protecting and promoting liberty, challenge government encroachment upon liberty, and lead the discussion of the law’s role in protecting and promoting liberty.

Purpose of the Position:
The Liberty and Law Center at the Antonin Scalia Law School is looking for a Free Speech Clinic Fellow to run its Free Speech Clinic for law students, which was launched in Fall of 2018. The Free Speech Clinic Fellow will collaborate with the Clinic Director to manage, instruct, and support the activities of the Free Speech Clinic. It is anticipated that the Clinic will focus on two core First Amendment objectives: (1) litigating and supporting cases and other legal proceedings that further the cause of free speech; and (2) training a group of future lawyers who want to advance their knowledge of the status of freedom of speech in the United States, and seek practical training in protecting freedom of speech.

Duties:
At the direction of the Clinic Director and the Center’s leadership, the Fellow’s responsibilities include but are not limited to:

Serve as the day-to-day manager of the Clinic.
Provide supervision and instruction to students in the Clinic, including feedback, mentoring, and training.
Solicit and manage ongoing cases, ensuring that the work is done in a timely and professional manner.
Assist with the organization and teaching of the Clinic, focusing on substantive knowledge of First Amendment doctrine and the litigation process, as well as effective legal writing, advocacy, and client relations skills.
Develop the focus of cases the Clinic will work on, including developing and maintaining relationships with public interest law firms with which the Clinic expects to collaborate.
Assist in managing the marketing and promotion of the Clinic.
Initiate Clinic and free speech focused events for Clinic students and the larger community.

Desired qualifications and skills:
A strong interest in freedom of speech and the First Amendment;
2 or more years of relevant experience;
Demonstrated ability to collaborate with others and execute projects;
Strong analytical and research skills; and
Strong spoken and written communication skills.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2RdACcy
via IFTTT

Free Speech Clinic seeks Fellow Starting 1/2020

I posted this job opportunity a while ago, but we have had to reopen the search. The position is for one and a half years, though there is potentially some wiggle room. The university h.r. bureaucracy has been slow to reopen the position on its website, so I can’t give you a link right now for an official application, but if you are interested, please email me directly at dbernste@gmu.edu and we will take it from there. Salary is commensurate with similar fellowships.

Purpose of the Organization:
The Liberty and Law Center is an academic center within Scalia Law School. Its mission is to provide a forum to learn about the role of law in protecting and promoting liberty, challenge government encroachment upon liberty, and lead the discussion of the law’s role in protecting and promoting liberty.

Purpose of the Position:
The Liberty and Law Center at the Antonin Scalia Law School is looking for a Free Speech Clinic Fellow to run its Free Speech Clinic for law students, which was launched in Fall of 2018. The Free Speech Clinic Fellow will collaborate with the Clinic Director to manage, instruct, and support the activities of the Free Speech Clinic. It is anticipated that the Clinic will focus on two core First Amendment objectives: (1) litigating and supporting cases and other legal proceedings that further the cause of free speech; and (2) training a group of future lawyers who want to advance their knowledge of the status of freedom of speech in the United States, and seek practical training in protecting freedom of speech.

Duties:
At the direction of the Clinic Director and the Center’s leadership, the Fellow’s responsibilities include but are not limited to:

Serve as the day-to-day manager of the Clinic.
Provide supervision and instruction to students in the Clinic, including feedback, mentoring, and training.
Solicit and manage ongoing cases, ensuring that the work is done in a timely and professional manner.
Assist with the organization and teaching of the Clinic, focusing on substantive knowledge of First Amendment doctrine and the litigation process, as well as effective legal writing, advocacy, and client relations skills.
Develop the focus of cases the Clinic will work on, including developing and maintaining relationships with public interest law firms with which the Clinic expects to collaborate.
Assist in managing the marketing and promotion of the Clinic.
Initiate Clinic and free speech focused events for Clinic students and the larger community.

Desired qualifications and skills:
A strong interest in freedom of speech and the First Amendment;
2 or more years of relevant experience;
Demonstrated ability to collaborate with others and execute projects;
Strong analytical and research skills; and
Strong spoken and written communication skills.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2RdACcy
via IFTTT

Global Manufacturing Inches Back Into Expansion, Despite Ongoing Slump In Export Orders

Global Manufacturing Inches Back Into Expansion, Despite Ongoing Slump In Export Orders

Good news, world! Global manufacturing – according to JPMorgan  – is back in expansion in November, rising to 50.3, a seven-month high.

Output and new orders saw marginal gains, while the trend in employment stabilised after job cuts in the prior six months.

International trade remained a drag on the sector, however, as new export business decreased for the fifteenth successive month.

Eleven of the nations for which November PMI data were available registered expansions, with the strongest growth signalled for Greece, Colombia and Brazil. The USA, China and France were also among the nations seeing an improvement. Germany and the Czech Republic remained at the bottom of the growth rankings.

Business optimism stayed relatively subdued in November, continuing the recent trend of lacklustre confidence. The lowest readings for the Future Output Index (which was first compiled in July 2012) have all been recorded during the past seven months.

Finally, we note that global stocks have perhaps front-run this modest rebound just a little too much on the heels of a year of printing money dangerously…

Source: Bloomberg

Sell the news?


Tyler Durden

Mon, 12/02/2019 – 11:52

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Y7zUPi Tyler Durden

‘No Quid Pro Quo’ Says Ukraine’s Zelensky In New Interview

‘No Quid Pro Quo’ Says Ukraine’s Zelensky In New Interview

Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky says in a new interview that he and President Trump never discussed a “quid pro quo” – though he was unhappy to have learned that US security aid had been blocked.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky sits for a portrait in Kyiv on Nov. 30, 2019 (Paolo Pellegrin—Magnum Photos for TIME)

I never talked to the president from the position of a quid pro quo. That’s not my thing,” Zelensky told TIME in an interview published Monday.

“I don’t want us to look like beggars. But you have to understand. We’re at war,” he continued. “If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us. I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo. It just goes without saying.

Allegations that President Trump abused his office are at the heart of impeachment proceedings in the House, as Democrats claim he ‘pressured’ Zelensky to investigate Democratic rival Joe Biden and his son Hunter, as well as a claim that the hacked DNC server was located within Ukraine.

Unbeknownst to Zelensky, nearly $400 million in US military aid had been paused – with Democrats claiming it was used as leverage for the Biden investigation, and the Trump administration claiming that they were concerned about how the money would be used in the notoriously corrupt country.

In 2014, Hunter Biden was hired to sit on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma – allegedly to protect its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, who was under investigation for money laundering, bribery, granting himself drilling permits while he was the Minister of Ecology, and other crimes.

Zlochevsky’s investment in Hunter Biden appeared to pay off, after Joe Biden notoriously threatened to withhold $1 billion in US aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire the country’s head prosecutor who was leading the investigation.

In short, total malarkey.

Tackling Corruption

Zelensky told Time that he wants to improve Ukraine’s image on the world stage after people – including President Trump, keep referring to it as corrupt.

“When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals,” said Zelensky. “It might seem like an easy thing to say, that combination of words: Ukraine is a corrupt country. Just to say it and that’s it. But it doesn’t end there. Everyone hears that signal. Investments, banks, stakeholders, companies, American, European, companies that have international capital in Ukraine, it’s a signal to them that says, ‘Be careful, don’t invest.’ Or, ‘Get out of there.’”

Read the rest of the interview here.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 12/02/2019 – 11:30

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2OGzOuL Tyler Durden

Chicago Cops Body-Slammed a Man on Thanksgiving, Then Charged Him With Assault

A viral video captured Bernard Kersh, 29, being slammed to the ground during a Thanksgiving arrest. Now the Chicago Police Department has charged the suspect with assault and placed the arresting officer on desk duty.

According to the police, Kersh was stopped for drinking on the public way. After being confronted, the department says, he threatened, became verbally abusive toward, and spat on the officers, then resisted arrest.

The incident was filmed and shared by Facebook user Jovonna Alexiss Jamison. The video shows Kersh with his body against a police truck. The arresting officer then picks Kersh up by the waist and throws him to the ground. He meets the sidewalk head first. Another man checks on Kersh, but he remains motionless for the remainder of the short video.

Kersh now faces charges for aggravated battery of a peace officer, resisting arrest, assault, and public drinking.

Civil rights activist Jesse Jackson tweeted a press release on Sunday saying that he would attend Kersh’s bond hearing later that day. “Unnecessary force could have cracked his skull,” he explained. “No one deserves this kind of treatment.”

Jackson’s concern for Kersh’s well-being is not without cause. In addition to the disturbing video, a picture that the police department shared on Facebook shows Kersh with what appears to be swelling under his eye. According to Jackson, Kersh was hospitalized.

Jackson’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition posted $500 for bail, and Kersh was allowed to return to his family under 24-hour surveillance.

WGN reports that Kersh has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. The local station also reports that the department is currently unaware of any body camera footage from the arrest.

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability announced on Friday that it is conducting an investigation.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2RcOS4Y
via IFTTT

Chicago Cops Body-Slammed a Man on Thanksgiving, Then Charged Him With Assault

A viral video captured Bernard Kersh, 29, being slammed to the ground during a Thanksgiving arrest. Now the Chicago Police Department has charged the suspect with assault and placed the arresting officer on desk duty.

According to the police, Kersh was stopped for drinking on the public way. After being confronted, the department says, he threatened, became verbally abusive toward, and spat on the officers, then resisted arrest.

The incident was filmed and shared by Facebook user Jovonna Alexiss Jamison. The video shows Kersh with his body against a police truck. The arresting officer then picks Kersh up by the waist and throws him to the ground. He meets the sidewalk head first. Another man checks on Kersh, but he remains motionless for the remainder of the short video.

Kersh now faces charges for aggravated battery of a peace officer, resisting arrest, assault, and public drinking.

Civil rights activist Jesse Jackson tweeted a press release on Sunday saying that he would attend Kersh’s bond hearing later that day. “Unnecessary force could have cracked his skull,” he explained. “No one deserves this kind of treatment.”

Jackson’s concern for Kersh’s well-being is not without cause. In addition to the disturbing video, a picture that the police department shared on Facebook shows Kersh with what appears to be swelling under his eye. According to Jackson, Kersh was hospitalized.

Jackson’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition posted $500 for bail, and Kersh was allowed to return to his family under 24-hour surveillance.

WGN reports that Kersh has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. The local station also reports that the department is currently unaware of any body camera footage from the arrest.

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability announced on Friday that it is conducting an investigation.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2RcOS4Y
via IFTTT