Watch Live: Janet Yellen Testifies Why The Fed Is Once Again “Uncertain”

Fed Chair Janet Yellen surprised markets again, when after weeks of a hawkish setup, she suggested that the Fed is not only uncertain “about when – and how much – inflation will respond to tightening resource utilization”, but warning that the federal funds rate may “not have to rise all that much further to get to a neutral policy stance.” And now it is her turn to explain why, as Richard Breslow lamented earlier, Fed watchers will soon need VR goggles to understand the relentlessly growing confusion in Fed announcements and forecasts.

A reminder of testimony protocol per the WSJ: the chairman of the committee and the ranking member for the Democrats typically both read prepared statements. Sometimes a subcommittee chair will also speak. Then Ms. Yellen will read aloud the testimony that we’ve already dissected here on the blog. Only then will questions begin. So although the hearing starts soon, we’re probably still 20 or 30 minutes away from anything new.

Watch live below:

via http://ift.tt/2u8IwIK Tyler Durden

Trump Rages: “Look What Hillary Clinton May Have Gotten Away With. Disgraceful”

President Trump thumb and forefinger have been busy this morning, both defending his son and attacking the opposition. First there was this…

…and now, a more pointed and important question that no one seems to be asking…

His tweet appears to be in reponse to Politico's report on the goings-on in Ukraine… (via DailyCaller)

Politico revealed in January some of the Ukrainian government’s anti-Trump activities during the election.

 

A veteran DNC operative who previously worked in the Clinton White House, Alexandra Chalupa, worked with Ukrainian government officials and journalists from both Ukraine and America to dig up Russia-related opposition research on Trump and Manafort. She also shared her anti-Trump research with both the DNC and the Clinton campaign, according to the Politico report.

 

Chalupa met with Ukrainian Ambassador Valeriy Chaly and one of his aides, Oksara Shulyar, at the Ukrainian Embassy in March 2016 to talk about unearthing Paul Manafort’s Russian connections, Chalupa admitted to Politico. Four days later, Trump officially hired Manafort.

 

“The day after Manafort’s hiring was revealed, she briefed the DNC’s communications staff on Manafort, Trump and their ties to Russia, according to an operative familiar with the situation,” Politico reported.

 

The Politico report also notes that the DNC encouraged Chalupa to try to arrange an interview with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to talk about Manafort’s ties to the former pro-Russia president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort previously advised.

 

The embassy declined to arrange the meeting but was nevertheless “helpful,” Chalupa told Politico. “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with,” she said, but added that “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

 

Chalupa also told Politico that the Ukrainian embassy worked directly with reporters in uncovering dirt on Manafort and Trump.

Like the Ukrainian embassy, the DNC distanced itself from Chalupa’s actions when asked by Politico, insisting that she was acting on her own.

Still, that's probably nothing.

And having said all that, amid claims by some media entities that The White House is "in chaos", Trump responds…

via http://ift.tt/2uihZtk Tyler Durden

Amazon Says “Prime Day 2017” Was The “Biggest Global Shopping Event In Amazon History”

Amazon announced that its Prime Day 2017 was the “Biggest Global Shopping Event in Amazon History”, surpassing Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales, “all on a day with deals reserved exclusively for Prime members” adding that “Prime members’ most popular purchase on Prime Day was the Amazon Echo Dot.”

Among the highlights of the latest spending spree: “the Prime Day 2017 event grew by more than 60 percent compared to the same 30 hours last year, and sales growth by small businesses and entrepreneurs was even higher. More new members joined Prime on July 11 than on any single day in Amazon history. Tens of millions of Prime members made a purchase on Prime Day 2017, more than 50 percent higher than the prior year.”

While this is great news for AMZN stock, which is clearly higher on the news, it is bad news for the rest of the retail sector – especially bricks and mortar – which continues to drift ever further away from the online shopping craze, especially when substantial discounts are factored in to those who are already locked inside the Amazon “ec(h)osystem”.

Full release below:

Prime Members Enjoyed Biggest Global Shopping Event in Amazon History

Prime Day sales surpassed Black Friday and Cyber Monday, all on a day with deals reserved exclusively for Prime members
Prime members’ most popular purchase on Prime Day was the Amazon Echo Dot
The Prime Day 2017 event grew by more than 60 percent over last year – sales growth by small businesses and entrepreneurs was even higher

SEATTLE–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Jul. 12, 2017– (NASDAQ:AMZN) – On a day with incredible deals reserved exclusively for Prime members, sales on July 11 surpassed Black Friday and Cyber Monday, making it the biggest day ever in Amazon history. With hundreds of thousands of deals, this year’s Prime Day was too big for 24 hours – so Prime members had 30 hours to shop. The Prime Day 2017 event grew by more than 60 percent compared to the same 30 hours last year, and sales growth by small businesses and entrepreneurs was even higher. More new members joined Prime on July 11 than on any single day in Amazon history. Tens of millions of Prime members made a purchase on Prime Day 2017, more than 50 percent higher than the prior year.

Prime members’ most popular purchase was the Echo Dot, which was not only the best-selling Amazon device this Prime Day, but also the best-selling product from any manufacturer in any category across Amazon globally. Prime Day 2017 was also the biggest sales event ever for Amazon devices in the U.S. and around the world, including record sales for Echo, Fire tablets and Kindle devices. The all new Element 55-inch 4K Ultra HD smart LED TV – Amazon Fire TV Edition was the best-selling TV deal in Amazon history – selling through record units in less than four hours. Top sellers from around the world, excluding Amazon devices, included:

  • U.S.: Instant Pot DUO80 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker; 23andMe DNA Tests for Health + Ancestry
  • U.K.: TP-Link Wi-Fi Smart Plug, works with Alexa; Sony Playstation 4
  • Spain: SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive; Moto G Plus (5th Generation) Smartphone; Lenovo Ideapad 310 Laptop
  • Mexico: AmazonBasics Apple Certified Lightning to USB Cable; Nintendo Switch
  • Japan: SAVAS Whey Protein; Happy Belly pure bottled water
  • Italy: Finish All in One Max tablets; Caffe Vergnano 1882 Espresso machine
  • India: OnePlus 5 phone; Seagate Expansion 1.5TB Portable External Drive
  • Germany and Austria: PlayStation Plus Membership; Soda Stream
  • France and Belgium: PlayStation Plus Membership; Game of Thrones – The Complete Season 1 to 6 Blu-Ray
  • China: Fisher Price Soothe and Glow Seahorse; A brief history of humankind+ A brief history of tomorrow set
  • Canada: Instant Pot Duo 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker, 8 Qt; AmazonBasics AA Rechargeable Batteries (8-Pack)
  • “To those customers who tried Prime for the first time and our long time members, thank you for a great Prime Day,” said Greg Greeley, Vice President, Amazon Prime. “Our teams around the world will keep working to add more and more to your membership, so Prime continues to make your life better every day. We are already looking forward to our Prime Day celebration next year.”

Global Highlights from Prime Day 2017

A record number of Prime members shopped across 13 countries.
Prime members purchased seven times more Amazon Echo devices globally than on Prime Day 2016.
Members saved hundreds of millions of dollars on product discounts globally, compared to the already low prices offered to non-Prime customers.
More than 3.5 million toys were purchased by customers worldwide on Prime Day 2017.
Tens of millions of customers used the Amazon App on Prime Day. Customer orders on the Amazon App more than doubled this Prime Day compared to last year.

U.S. Highlights from Prime Day 2017

Members found deals organized by more than 20 of the most-shopped-for themes – from Pet Lovers to Gardeners and more. The most popular themes on Prime Day were Home Chefs, Techies and For the Home.
Prime members purchased more than 50,000 TP-Link Smart Plugs.
The fastest Prime Now deliveries on Prime Day were in Sunnyvale and Berkeley, California and Kirkland, Washington to members who ordered snacks, writeable DVD packs and a Samsung Internal SSD. The orders were each delivered in 12 minutes.
More than 200,000 women’s dresses and more than 200,000 lightbulbs were purchased by customers on Prime Day 2017.
More than 100,000 items from Amazon Launchpad startups including the Anova Culinary Bluetooth Sous Vide Precision Cooker, Soylent Coffiest Meal Replacement Drink, Skybell Wi-Fi Video Doorbells and LIFX Wi-Fi Smart LED Light Bulb were orders by customers by on Prime Day 2017.

Prime Members Love Movies, Music and Books

In the week leading up to Prime Day 2017, Prime members enjoyed Prime Video, Prime Reading, Amazon Music and Audible, streaming and downloading more than two times compared to last year. Also in the week leading up to Prime Day, the most downloaded Kindle Unlimited book was Stillhouse Lake and the most streamed song on Amazon Music was “Something Just Like This” by the Chainsmokers & Coldplay.

Small Business and Entrepreneur Highlights from Prime Day 2017

Prime Day 2017 was another record-breaking success for small businesses and entrepreneurs worldwide who participated in the event. Feedback from small businesses and entrepreneurs includes:

“We’re absolutely thrilled – our daily sales increased by over 500 times on Prime Day. Within the first six hours, Furbo Dog Camera shot up to the No.1 Best Seller in four categories including the highly competitive pet supplies and home monitor category,” said, Victor Chang, Furbo Dog Camera, Bellevue, Washington.

“Prime Day was a huge success for us. We had a massive lift in sales last night compared to an average Monday night, and our deal sold out almost as soon as it went live. The level of demand far surpassed our expectations,” said Caron Proschan, Simply Gum, New York, New York.

“Prime Day has been another amazing success this year! Both Monday and Tuesday (Prime Day) were record days in sales for our business. It’s great to have the additional sales boost during these traditionally slower summer months,” said Tyler & Courtney LeCompte, Confetti Momma, Lafayette, Louisiana.

“Overall, for the Prime Day event (all 30 hours), we saw about 20 times more overall sales. This is a huge benefit to our business, as it gives us exposure to thousands of new customers, and helps us with cash flow as we ramp up on inventory for the Holiday Season,” said Ben Arneberg, Willow & Everett, Boston, Massachusetts.

“So far, this year’s Prime Day sales increased 350 percent from last year’s. Getting the opportunity to offer lightning deals as a Handmade at Amazon artisan has been a boom to my business,” said Marcia Ricchiuti, Kahili Creations, Pahoa, Hawaii.

“LightAccents had a fantastic Prime Day. It was our best sales day in over two years,” said Lawrence Bibi, LightAccents, based in New York, New York.

Prime Member Highlights from Prime Day 2017

We spoke to several Prime members who shopped on Prime Day and this is what they told us:

“When you’re a teacher, your first priority is, and always will be, your students. Thanks to Prime Day, I bought a lot of things, thinking of my students from this past year and this next year. Magnet letters to use for practicing spelling words, stools for them to sit on while working with me at a table, and many books. I also bought some Velcro “coins” to use in the class room. These are life savers!” said Laura McIntosh from Tucson, Arizona.

“After some browsing, I saw that the Fire HD 8 Tablet was on sale for $49.99. Having the newest version with Alexa capabilities, it will be perfect as I plan for my own wedding. I’m an event planner and also have three other weddings from the end of August until December. That is a lot of things to remember. The Fire Tablet can now be with me on commutes and at the airport and maybe I will start to read for fun again,” said Jade Barnes from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

“I could hardly believe the savings! Amazon proves time and time again that its reliability and product pricing simply cannot be beat. I am a very proud Prime member and cardholder and I cannot imagine my life without Amazon,” said Liana Babich from Warwick, Rhode Island.

via http://ift.tt/2uiuxRo Tyler Durden

RBS Pays $5.5 BIllion To Settle US Mortgage-Backed Securities Probe

Another day, another British bank fined billions of dollars for its past-life transgressions.

Moments ago Royal Bank of Scotland announced it has agreed to pay $5.5 billion to the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency to settle a probe into its sale of toxic mortgage-backed securities ahead of the financial crisis, part of what it says was a “heavy price” paid for over-expansion before the financial crisis. The settlement targets $32 billion in debt issued by housing agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“This settlement is a stark reminder of what happened to this bank before the financial crisis, and the heavy price paid for its pursuit of global ambitions” said RBS CEO Ross McEwan, adding that it was an “important step forward in resolving one of the most significant legacy matters facing RBS”. There was some good news: RBS is eligible for a $754 million reimbursement under indemnification agreements with third parties.

According to the WSJ, RBS said in a statement that it had already set aside funds to cover most of the cost of the settlement. The 71% U.K. government owned bank will have to take an additional charge of $196 million which will be realized in its coming results in August.

Settling these probes is a major hurdle for RBS as it continues its slow return to private hands. U.K. government officials have said they would not sell down the government’s stake until they have clarity on the size of the U.S. fines RBS may face. RBS warned Wednesday that “further substantial provisions and costs may be recognized…depending upon the final outcomes.”

 

RBS had set aside $8.3 billion to cover a range of allegations linked to its role in packaging and selling on subprime mortgages in the lead up to the financial crisis. The bank still faces probes from several U.S. agencies including a criminal and civil investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to the FHFA, the RBS settlement marked the conclusion of the 17th of 18 lawsuits it filed in 2011 in relation to the matter.

via http://ift.tt/2tMN0lK Tyler Durden

Cory Doctorow’s ‘Fully Automated Luxury Communist Civilization’: New at Reason

Cory Doctorow Cory Doctorow, of BoingBoing and Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) fame, has returned to adult fiction after a long stint in the young adult hinterlands (Little Brother, Homeland). His new novel, Walkaway (Tor), circles back to the theme of his first novel, 2003’s Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom: the question of what a post-scarcity world might look like. A fascinating cadre of John Galt–style opters-out form the core of the new novel, but the story is concept-driven, not character-driven.

As usual, Doctorow’s politics permeate his writing. And, as usual, they’re just heterodox enough to provide moments of delightful confirmation bias and squirm-inducing challenge for readers of nearly every ideological stripe.

Doctorow, a civil libertarian who identifies with the political left, has staked out a broad and eccentric territory for his fiction and nonfiction beats, covering topics from privacy to drones to Digital Rights Management (DRM) to open-source software creation, writes Katherine Mangu-Ward, who recently sat down with Doctorow for a wide-ranging interview.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2uR87Ui
via IFTTT

Putting the Latest Silver Crash Under a Lens

On Thursday, July 6, in the late afternoon (as reckoned in Arizona), the price of silver crashed. The move was very brief, but very intense. The price hit a low under $14.40 before recovering to around $15.80 which is about 20 cents lower than where it started.

Buyers of silver are rejoicing. They can now get more money (silver, like gold, is money) in exchange for their dollars than before. However, as we see from the reactions in the community, there were few buyers.

Cries of woe are heard everywhere. Those who are crying are sellers, including those who say they don’t plan to sell but who really want a high price in case they change their mind by Monday morning.

If you want to see what it looks like when everyone is thinking of buying, look at the bitcoin market when there is a price drop. The enthusiasm is palpable. Everyone is gloating about buying the dips, with faith unbroken that the cryptocurrency is on its way to shoot past $10,000 if not $1,000,000.

Gold and silver are the opposite. For now. And perhaps that is a sign that here is a good opportunity. Blood in the streets, as the expression goes.

The purpose of this article is to look deeply into the trading action at the time of the crash. First, here is a graph showing the bid and offer prices for about 50 seconds. The horizontal axis shows time, but it is ticks rather than seconds or milliseconds. So, for example, it does not show the 10-second period when CME halted the exchange.

For most of this time period, there is an orderly market as seen in the tight bid-offer spread, though even from the start we observe that on price drops the bid drops more. That becomes extreme where the bid hits $14.10 (which occurs right after the halt). From that point onwards, we see a very wide bid-offer spread. The bid looks to be held low deliberately, around $14.33, while the offer is moving around as buyers begin lifting it.

Let’s address the wide spread. The banks have been under assault for their trading practices. Among other things, they are blamed for having proprietary positions, for “leaking” information during the Fixing, for having a too-large position, etc. The net result is to push the compliance department into prominence. No longer can the bank act when the market offers a profitable opportunity for arbitrage.

Arbitrage causes spreads to tighten, as part of the process of making money.

But before a bank may arbitrage something, they must weigh their proposed trade against the new regulations. And of course, always they must be aware of the optics. It does them no good to make a perfectly legal trade that will bring resentment, more regulatory scrutiny, and possibly litigation.

For example, what is the difference between a “prop” (proprietary) trade, and ordinary market-maker arbitrage? Don’t bother trying to answer this question. Unless you are a commodities lawyer who is intimately familiar with the regulations as they existed on July 6, and also familiar with the current interpretations of the regulators, you cannot answer. Regulations can make distinctions between two maddeningly similar actions, or even identical actions in confusingly similar contexts. On one side of the distinction lies your right to earn a profit. On the other side is regulatory action, penalties, brand damage, and possibly an extended visit to prison.

With such large differences in outcomes, based on such fine lines between actions, you can bet that the banks are backing away from trades they would otherwise take. They are becoming more conservative and making less money. And leaving the market less efficient, more costly to do business in, and more volatile.

In this light, we submit for your consideration the fact that after 23:06:50 the banks were leaving 10 to 12 cents per ounce on the table. That is an attractive profit for a market maker, and it takes a powerful force to keep them from wanting to earn it.

Ironically, the net result of all this pressure on the banks is the opposite of what the gold and silver community wants. It does not cause the price to rise. Instead, it contributes to two other phenomena. One is higher volatility. Crashes like this occur when the stack of bids is thin. That is precisely what happens when banks are under pressure to stand back.

Two is rising costs. The bid-offer spread is the cost of a round-trip. It is one measure of the friction in the market. This cost affects traders, producers, and consumers of metal. Silver has long been the most hoardable commodity for workers to set aside part of their weekly wages, because its spread is the narrowest for the quantities involved. These regulations are undermining silver for this use.

A word on the thin market. Unlike the June 26 crash on (which we wrote about), this one occurred when Europe was asleep and the US was mostly offline. Markets were open in Sydney, and perhaps a few early risers in Asia (7am in China). However, in a liquid market, there would be little impact to such selling even then. Indeed we see in gold, the price drop was $5—hardly worth writing an article about.

Regulations imposed on prop trading, insider trading, position limits, asset reservation, and other aspects of running a market making operation drive down liquidity. Whether this move was triggered by stop-loss orders or something nefarious, we do not know (we can only say that we see no reason why governments or central banks would care about the price of silver).

Here is a chart of what happened in the one minute after 11:06pm GMT, millisecond (1/1000th of a second) by millisecond, showing volume-weighted average price overlaid on number of contracts traded.

At this time scale, we can see there are upticks. Yes even in a crash like this one, there are upticks.

To reiterate what we said in our last forensic analysis of a crash, in a free market there would be no such thing as gold or silver. The futures market is for goods that are produced seasonally, but consumed throughout the year. It is a market for warehousing.

There would be an interest-rate market for gold, i.e. a bond market. A gold futures market is a bizarre creature, created by the artificial environment of irredeemable currencies and laws that force everyone to use them.

In that context, a futures market for gold makes sense in a way. It is a way to bet on the price action, to generate profits in dollars. Like all other derivatives markets, the gold futures market offers leverage so that traders can maximize profits even when price moves are small.

Of course, big leveraged positions mean big risk. That is why they must set tight stop-loss orders. This is one possible explanation for the crash. Initial selling triggered stop orders, and those triggered others, and with a thin stack of bids, whoosh.

And it is also the basis (no pun intended) of our basis analysis. We like to see how much these leveraged bettors are moving the price.

This brings us to the unique Monetary Metals analysis. If the price of spot is falling relative to futures, then we know there was selling of spot. If the price of futures is falling relative to spot, then we know there was selling of futures.

This spread, future price – spot price, is called the basis.

Below is a chart of the silver price overlaid with the September silver basis from 10pm to midnight GMT.

No question, we see selling of futures. Whether these are stop-loss orders or something else, we don’t have the data to say. What is certain is that the basis drops twice. First, just prior to 22:40 when the price is rising. There is some buying of metal here. But then that buying fades and is replaced by buying of futures, thus the basis recovers and rises about 5bps above its initial level.

Then the basis drops, starting just prior to the price drop. So the first bit of selling of futures appears as a drop in the futures price relative to spot, though price does not move much initially. Then the thin bid is pierced, and the price goes over the edge of the cliff.

The basis begins rising, going more +30bps over its starting point. This is a frenzy of buying—of paper (futures).

Other than that brief blip up in price from around $15.88 to $16.10, this episode was not about physical metal.

 

Monetary Metals will be exhibiting and FreedomFest in Las Vegas in July. If you are an investor and would like a meeting there, please click here.

 

© 2017 Monetary Metals

via http://ift.tt/2tMuv0U Monetary Metals

How Hermitage Capital, Ziff Brothers And The Clinton Global Initiative Prompted The Trump Jr. Meeting

When Trump Jr. took his now-infamous meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya he was promised “official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.”  That said, Trump Jr. has since described Veselnitskaya’s ‘damaging information’ as nothing more than “inane nonsense.”

So what “information” was Veselnitskaya peddling that could be used as a political weapon in the 2016 presidential election? 

According to a note from Bloomberg this morning, the answer to that question is a very sordid tale that involves Hermitage Capital, Ziff Brothers Investments, The Clinton Global Initiative, a decade-old story on an international tax evasion scandal and a new film Veselnitskaya had been eagerly promoting called “The Magnitsky Act — Behind the Scenes”…all of which probably helps explain why a British publicist was involved in setting up the original meeting, why Trump Jr. was confused by Veselnitskaya’s “inane nonsense” and why Jared Kushner decided to leave the meeting after 5-10 minutes.

Where do we start?  Veselnitskaya’s story focuses on William Browder, a fund manager at Hermitage Capital, and his lawyer Sergei Magnitsky. 

On a side note, if that Magnitsky name sounds familiar it’s because he’s the person behind the “Magnitsky Act” which resulted in a U.S. law that branded 18 Russians as human-rights abusers.  Magnitsky died in a Moscow prison after uncovering what he said was a tax fraud that diverted $230 million from Russian taxpayers into the pockets of a handful of civil servants. The 2012 law angered the Kremlin, which then prohibited most adoptions from Russia to the U.S., chilling relations between Washington and Moscow.

Natalia

 

So how did Veselnitskaya come to focus on Hermitage and Ziff?  Bloomberg explains:

Veselnitskaya’s apparent interest in Browder and Hermitage picked up a decade-old thread. Browder, who was pressing for greater transparency in Russia’s financial sector, was kicked out of the country in 2005. Russian officials accused him and his lawyer, Magnitsky, of tax evasion and put them on trial — Browder in absentia, and Magnitsky after his death. Browder was convicted of tax fraud in 2013.

 

Just weeks before the Trump Tower meeting, Russia’s general prosecutor had returned to the matter. On May 19, 2016, the office issued a statement that its investigation into purchases of shares in gas giant Gazprom by Browder’s Hermitage Fund and his investors, including Ziff Brothers, had found they evaded more than 1 billion rubles ($16 million) in Russian taxes, transferring the profits to Ziff-controlled companies overseas. Russian prosecutors said they suspected the transactions also may have violated U.S. law and that they planned to send an international-assistance request to the U.S. seeking a probe.

 

Veselnitskaya repeated those allegations in comments to the Russian press about the Magnitsky case at the time.

 

On June 4, 2017, Yuri Chaika, Russia’s general prosecutor, said on national television that his agency “has presented serious evidence of violations of the law by Browder and the Ziff brothers” to U.S. officials. There’s no indication of any U.S. response to that claim.

And the connection to the Clinton Global Initiative?  Apparently Browder’s firm, Hermitage Capital, is listed as a contributor of $10,000 to $25,000 because he paid to attend a CGI conference about a decade ago and Ziff Brothers’ Daniel Ziff is recorded as contributing $50,000 to $100,000 to CGI.

So why did Veselnitskaya care?  Apparently it all relates back to her efforts to roll-back the Magnitsky Act.

She’s also traveled to the U.S. in a matter related to the Magnitsky affair — her only case outside of Russia, she has said. She represented Denis Katsyv, the owner of Prevezon Holdings Ltd., an investment company based in Cyprus accused by the U.S. of laundering gains from the alleged tax fraud against the Hermitage Fund into New York real estate. Prevezon settled the case for $5.9 million in May, while admitting no wrongdoing.

 

Days after the Trump Tower meeting, she appeared in Washington, D.C., for the screening of the film, “The Magnitsky Act — Behind the Scenes,” at the Newseum. The movie’s premise is that Browder himself was behind the fraud, and it attempts to cast doubts on whether Magnitsky was tortured to death.

 

Afterward, Veselnitskaya told Sputnik News that she had filed a report with Congress, claiming that Browder had duped Congress into adopting the Magnitsky Act, which placed financial and travel sanctions on individuals associated with the alleged tax fraud.

Confused yet?  Perhaps the only thing we ‘understand’ about this story with any level of real clarity is Jared Kushner’s seemingly logical decision to leave the meeting with Veselnitskaya after only 5-10 minutes.

via http://ift.tt/2tdHAyy Tyler Durden

Breslow Slams Fed Confusion: “FOMC Charts Will Need Virtual Reality Headsets To Deal With The Added Dimensions”

Hawkish? Dovish? Balance sheet reductionist? Rate-hike limited? Worried about inflation or excited by the economic outlook? Or just plain old confused?

What and why did Yellen just say what she did, unleashing the latest market reaction to her supposedly “dovish” congressional testimony, and sending risk assets higher just two weeks after the same Janet Yellen warned about frothy market valuations?

It turns out, you are not the only one who can no longer make any sense of it. As Bloomberg’s macro commentator Richard Brelsow notes, “we’re no longer just going to have doves and hawks to consider, but B/Sers and ratists. Charts about FOMC meeting outcomes will need virtual reality headsets to deal with the added dimensions. I’d settle for here’s what were going to do because it’s the right thing to do. And we’ll deal with what comes if necessary, that’s how we roll.”

He than rages at the Fed which “has a plan. But in essence has no plan. They have a desire. And the justifications for it vary over time. As does its perceived imperativeness. It’s why they keep telling us all the permutations of the stop and go strategy they say will work. They love sounding smart to themselves. But it all comes out as we hope so. They are so obviously trying to convince themselves rather than the investing community of the efficacy of their actions. Quite the opposite of sounding resolute, they appear unsure. Not what you want in a doctor, fiduciary or central banker.

And then a disclaimer on disclaimers:

Disclaimers are there to insulate people when things go wrong. They aren’t really there as warnings. No one gets sued if everyone is getting rich. But the Fed is leading with the caution. And in the process opening wide the casino doors for harmful speculation and futile trading. When will they announce? How do we evaluate the trade-off between the balance sheet and rates? We’re all going to spend the next months, maybe years, arguing whether a number affects one or the other more. Speech after speech is going to further muddy the waters as they publicly debate the issue among themselves

He concludes with an ominous warning for the Fed: “I have news for you, when this chapter of financial history is written, the authors won’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the disclaimers then, either.

Then again, Breslow has had a rather “angry” period in the past few weeks; our advice: relax – the Fed confusion over how to put the genie which the Fed first released, back in the bottle, is only just starting.

His full note below:

The Fed’s Making Hawks or Doves a Quaint Concept

 

Have you ever actually read the tiny print on the lengthy warning insert included with even the most innocuous drug? Doubtful. The farthest you are likely to get is the list of side-effects designed to insulate the manufacturer and ensure you stop reading immediately. Put this gel on your cut finger to prevent infection. But discontinue use if you experience bleeding from your eye sockets for an extended period. You end up just taking it on faith that someone other than the product liability lawyer who wrote it has read it. Certainly the clerk who rings up the purchase doesn’t make you study it first. Hey, you opened the tube so it’s now all on you.

 

It’s even worse with fund offering memoranda. They begin by telling you that this opportunity is only to be made available to sophisticated investors. Stop right there. I’m sophisticated, so do I really need to focus on the details? I don’t want to look like a rube in front of these people. And if you’ve ever been to a pitch, no one spends even a nanosecond on those disclaimer paragraphs in the documents. Shall we quickly just flip to the past results graph and look at what we’re all sure will be replicated. Oh, and don’t get caught up in the language about side-pockets. Don’t think of it as style drift. More like, say, responding to exigent circumstances.

 

In both of these cases, the presumption is strongly skewed to making the leap of faith that nothing can go wrong. Trust me, I know best. So let’s focus on the good. Which is why I find the hand-wringing and introspection by the members of the FOMC over whether, when and how to begin balance sheet reduction along with further rate rises troubling as well as frustrating.

 

The market has so far accepted the premise that the experts know exactly the way those trillions of assets can be run-off with pain to no one. Why should it affect any of the assets that have been wildly distorted by building up the balance sheet to begin with? What does Jamie Dimon know about markets, anyway?

 

The Fed has a plan. But in essence has no plan. They have a desire. And the justifications for it vary over time. As does its perceived imperativeness. It’s why they keep telling us all the permutations of the stop and go strategy they say will work. They love sounding smart to themselves. But it all comes out as we hope so. They are so obviously trying to convince themselves rather than the investing community of the efficacy of their actions. Quite the opposite of sounding resolute, they appear unsure. Not what you want in a doctor, fiduciary or central banker.

 

Disclaimers are there to insulate people when things go wrong. They aren’t really there as warnings. No one gets sued if everyone is getting rich. But the Fed is leading with the caution. And in the process opening wide the casino doors for harmful speculation and futile trading. When will they announce? How do we evaluate the trade-off between the balance sheet and rates? We’re all going to spend the next months, maybe years, arguing whether a number affects one or the other more. Speech after speech is going to further muddy the waters as they publicly debate the issue among themselves.

 

We’re no longer just going to have doves and hawks to consider, but B/Sers and ratists. Charts about FOMC meeting outcomes will need virtual reality headsets to deal with the added dimensions. I’d settle for here’s what were going to do because it’s the right thing to do. And we’ll deal with what comes if necessary, that’s how we roll. I have news for you, when this chapter of financial history is written, the authors won’t spend a lot of time dwelling on the disclaimers then, either.

via http://ift.tt/2tMVmd2 Tyler Durden

Yellen’s Shocking Announcement:The $USD is TOAST

Fed Chair Janet Yellen just announced that the Fed will be kicking the $USD off a cliff.

She didn’t use those words, but the words she did use weren’t all that different.

But first a little context…

The fact is that the $USD has been falling steadily throughout 2017. At this time of this writing, it was down nearly 7% year to date.

And this was during a period in which the Fed was RAISING interest rates multiple times!

Enter Yellen’s testimony to Congress today.

Going into this meeting, the Yellen Fed was talking about aggressive tightening with multiple more rate hikes AND the Fed draining liquidity from the system via a shrinking of its balance sheet.

In this context, Yellen just made a complete 180 degree turn in front of Congress a few minutes ago.

She was dovish.

And not just a little… I mean DOVISH.

A few of her key comments:

  • The Fed doesn’t need to raise rates that much further to be at a neutral level.
  • Inflation is running below the Fed’s goal.
  • The Fed won’t use the shrinking of its balance sheet as a “monetary tool” (meaning it won’t be about draining liquidity from the system).

Put simply, the Yellen Fed is in fact just about done with tightening.

And the $USD is toast.

It's time to get moving into inflation plays.

If you’re not taking steps to actively prepare your portfolio for this, you need to so now.

We just published a Special Investment Report concerning a secret back-door play on Gold that gives you access to 25 million ounces of Gold that the market is currently valuing at just $273 per ounce.

The report is titled The Gold Mountain: How to Buy Gold at $273 Per Ounce

We are giving away just 100 copies for FREE to the public.

As I write this, we're down to just 79 left.

To pick up yours, swing by:

http://ift.tt/1TII1fq

Best Regards

Graham Summers

Chief Market Strategist

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

via http://ift.tt/2udYbpZ Phoenix Capital Research

Bonds, Bullion, & Stocks Jump, Dollar Dumps On ‘Dovish’ Yellen Remarks

The market seems convinced, judging by the knee-jerk reaction, that Janet Yellen has retreated back to her 'dovish' corner following the release of her prepared remarks…

Stocks have shrugged off any Trump agenda fears…

 

And investors are buying bonds too…and gold…

 

Smells like the 'QE trade' all over again.

And the dollar is cratering (Yellen dovishness compounding reduced Trump agenda odds)…

via http://ift.tt/2tMrEoC Tyler Durden