Goldman: Investors Will Soon Capitulate

After the inflation in P/E multiples has sent the S&P500 to to a level above the 90% percentile of all historical valuations, Goldman has called a time out, and says that there will be no more multiple expansion. As a result only one thing will push stock prices higher “as equity valuations compress as interest rates rise” – higher profits.

In his latest note, Goldman’s equity strategist David Kostin says that his tactical view remains that S&P 500 has peaked at 2400 and (unlike BofA’s recent flipflop which now expects the S&P to keep rising to 2,450 after earlier predicting a 2,300 year end target) will fade to 2300 by year-end. In fact, looking dead ahead, Goldman comes about as close as it has in recent months warning of an imminent market drop: “investors will soon capitulate on their expectation of upside to 2017 EPS forecasts as they face the reality that the accretive impact from tax reform will not occur until 2018. In fact, revisions to consensus EPS forecasts during the past few months have been negative for both 2017 and 2018.”

But don’t worry: like other recent sellside notes, any imminent corrections (or crashes) will be a “buy the dip” opportunity, and thus Goldman keeps its year-end 2019 S&P 500 target at 2500, a 6% rise from the current index level and implies a forward P/E multiple contraction of 5% to 18x.

Below are some further observations on the current state of the market from Kostin.

Thursday marked the 8th anniversary of the current bull market, making it the second-longest on record. On March 9, 2009, the S&P 500 index traded at 677 and it now stands at 2365, reflecting a price gain of 250% or 17% annualized (19% annualized with dividends). Happy Birthday indeed!

But the current bull market is really a tale of two sub-cycles (Exhibit 1).

During the first phase (March 2009 to April 2011), the market rallied on the back of a rebound in earnings from the depths of the Global Financial Crisis. Higher profits accounted for 66% of the index’s 102% gain while P/E multiple expansion explained just 17% of the rally (faster expected EPS growth contributed the remainder; see Exhibit 2).

In 2011, the US only narrowly averted defaulting on the national debt. As Congress dithered over the debt ceiling, the S&P 500 plunged by 19%, just missing the 20% threshold typically used to define a bear market. Hence, some investors debate over whether the current bull market started from the low in 2009 or after the debt ceiling debacle in 2011. Since the market low of 1099 in 2011, the S&P 500 has climbed by 115%.

This second phase of the bull market has lasted more than five years and has been driven mostly by an increase in valuation rather than the level of profits. The adjusted P/E multiple climbed to 18x from 10x, explaining 71% of the rise in the index. Higher earnings accounted for just 28% of the rise.

After the inflation in P/E multiple, the S&P 500 now trades at the 90th percentile of historical valuation relative to the past 40 years. Current consensus forward P/E of 18.1x is the highest level since 1976 outside of the Tech bubble. The median stock trades at the 99th percentile vs. history.

The drivers of a bull market matter for investors. Some rallies are powered by earnings while others rely on valuation. Since 2011, real GDP expanded at an average annual pace of 2%, Fed funds hovered at extraordinarily low levels, and the valuation of stocks surged. However, looking forward, growth in an economy with limited slack will lead to rising inflation, higher interest rates, and a lower P/E multiple.

We are on the cusp of the Fed accelerating its pace of tightening. The Current Activity Indicator (CAI) from our US Economics team stands at 4.4% following the strongest ADP report in three years, above-consensus payroll gains of 235K, and an unemployment rate of 4.7%. Our wage tracker has accelerated to 2.8%. Next week we expect the FOMC will tighten the funds rate by 25 bp (to 0.75%-1.0%) and futures imply an additional two hikes during the remaining nine months of 2017 to roughly 1.4%. The 10-year US Treasury yield equals 2.6% and is marching towards our 3% year-end target.

 Continued US economic expansion will lift operating EPS by 13% to $127 by 2019 (adjusted EPS of $134). Our 2500 year-end 2019 target for the S&P 500 represents a 6% rise from the current index level and implies an adjusted forward P/E contraction of 5% to 18x from 19x, consistent with our forecast of higher interest rates. Simply put, only higher profits will support higher stock prices because equity valuations will almost certainly be lower.

Our tactical view remains that S&P 500 has peaked at 2400 and will fade to 2300 by year-end. S&P 500 has rallied by 11% since the election amidst optimism that corporate tax reform will increase S&P 500 earnings. However, investors will soon capitulate on their expectation of upside to 2017 EPS forecasts as they face the reality that the accretive impact from tax reform will not occur until 2018. In fact, revisions to consensus EPS forecasts during the past few months have been negative for both 2017 and 2018. There are only two drivers of stock performance when multiples stop expanding: (1) Earnings growth, and/or (2) expected earnings revisions.

via http://ift.tt/2nbgoBK Tyler Durden

Vitol Warns U.S. Crude Exports Will Grow “A Lot More”

Authored by Tsvetana Paraskova via OilPrice.com,

Rising production in the Permian, coupled with cheap pipeline and railway transport fees to the Gulf of Mexico, will enable the U.S. to significantly raise its already record-high crude oil exports, Mike Loya, head of the Americas business at oil trading giant Vitol Group, told Bloomberg in an interview published on Friday.

We will see a lot more growth in U.S. crude exports,” said the manager of Vitol, the company that handled the first U.S. cargo after restrictions on oil exports were lifted at the end of 2015.

Since the restrictions were lifted, U.S. crude oil has reached customers in various regions around the world, including buyers in Venezuela, China, Italy, and Israel.

Vitol’s Loya believes that Asia will be increasingly one of the top destinations for U.S. crude oil, after the initial expansion to the Caribbean markets, Latin America, and Europe.

According to Loya, the Permian crude production would increase by between 600,000 bpd and 700,000 bpd by the end of this year, and “a lot of that is going to be exported”.

The EIA currently expects U.S. crude oil production to average 9.2 million bpd this year and 9.7 million bpd next year, compared to an estimated 8.9 million bpd pumped in 2016. The Administration’s latest Drilling Productivity Report shows that the Permian is expected to add 70,000 bpd to its production this month to reach 2.250 million bpd.

In terms of exports, in two weeks in February, U.S. crude exports soared to above 1 million bpd – 1.026 million bpd in the week of February 10, and 1.211 million bpd in the week of February 17, EIA data shows.

Should exports keep their pace, they could help alleviate some of the record-breaking inventories piled up in the U.S.

The high exports pace recently is also the result of the deeper discount of WTI against Brent.

According to Tony Starkey, manager of energy analysis at Platts Analytics:

It’s pure economics. WTI/Brent finally widened enough to make some additional exports profitable since the export ban was lifted.”

via http://ift.tt/2nrkyl2 Tyler Durden

Protest Breaks Out Near Turkish Consulate In Rotterdam, Dutch Embassy In Turkey Closed Off

Hundreds of demonstrators waving Turkish flags gathered outside the Turkish consulate in the Dutch city of Rotterdam on Saturday night, demanding to see the Turkish minister for family affairs as a diplomatic scandal between the two countries escalated.

Earlier in the day, Turkish Foreign Minister, Mevlut Cavusoglu was barred from flying into Rotterdam to participate in pro-Erdogan rallies, to which the Turkish president responded by calling the Dutch “fascists” and his NATO partner a Nazi remnant” as the scandal over Ankara campaigning among emigre Turkish voters, which has recently swept Germany, Switzerland and Austria, intensified.

Police erected metal barriers and patrolled on horseback to keep the demonstrators away from the consulate as the crowd grew with more pro-Turkish protesters arriving from Germany, according to Reuters. A video released by a Turkish camera operator shows him being attacked by a police dog after he refused to leave the area in front of the consulate.

Turkish Family Minister Fatma Betul Sayan Kaya traveled by road to the Netherlands from neighboring Germany after the Dutch government revoked the landing rights for the plane carrying the foreign minister earlier on Saturday. Dutch TV footage showed police stopping the minister’s convoy near the Turkish consulate in Rotterdam and preventing her from entering the building.

The Dutch government said it did not want Turkish politicians campaigning among Turkish emigres in the Netherlands, leading President Tayyip Erdogan to brand the fellow NATO member a “Nazi remnant”. The government also said it does not object to meetings in the Netherlands to give information about the Turkish referendum, “but these meetings should not add to tensions in our society and everybody who wants to organize a meeting must adhere to instructions from authorities so that public order and security can be guaranteed.” It said the Turkish government “does not want to respect the rules in this matter.”

Meanwhile, over in Turkey, the Dutch embassy and consulate in Turkey were closed off “for security reasons” on Saturday following the latest diplomatic scandal. The residences of the Dutch ambassador, charge d’affaires and consul general were also closed off, according to Reuters.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry said earlier in a statement that Ankara did not want “the Dutch ambassador, currently on leave, to return to his post for some time.”

“It has been explained to our counterparts that this grave decision taken against Turkey and the Dutch Turkish community will cause serious problems diplomatically, politically, economically and in other areas,” the statement said, as cited by Reuters.

Turkey’s president Erdogan is expected to make a statement to the nation momentarily in response to the Dutch “provocation.”

The unexpected escalation in tensions between the Netherlands and Turkey comes just three days ahead of the critical Dutch general election on March 15, in which the anti-immigration, anti-EU, Freedom Party of Geert Wilders is expected to emerge as the largest party. Today’s tensions may boost support for his platform which has seen a modest drop in public approval in recent days. A full preview of the Dutch General Election can be found here.

via http://ift.tt/2nr05gq Tyler Durden

These Four Charts Are Issuing a Warning on Stocks

While CNBC and the financial media continue to rave about stocks being near their all-time highs, beneath the surface of the market we are seeing signs of big trouble.

Consider the following…

As Michael Batnick noted last week, the S&P 500 as a whole is just 1.6% off its all time highs, but the average stock is down 9.6% from its 52-week high.

Put another way, while the overall index is being held up by a few names, a significant number of companies are already in full blown corrections.

Note the large divergence between the S&P 500 and the number of S&P 500 companies above their 50-DMAs. Momentum is clearly rolling over here.

Speaking of which…

US Steel (X), which has been a poster child for the “Trump economic utopia” trade has taken out critical support (red line) as well as its election night rally trendline (blue line). The momentum here is gone.

Another economically sensitive company, copper producer Freeport McMoRan (FCX), has not only taken out critical support but has already erased virtually all of its “election” rally.

Finally, high yield credit (HYG), which usually leads stocks, has completely collapsed.

All of these charts are warning that the market is susceptible to a sharp correction at best and possibly even a meltdown.

On that note, we are already preparing our clients for this with a 21-page investment report titled the Stock Market Crash Survival Guide.

In it, we outline the coming collapse will unfold…which investments will perform best… and how to take out “crash” insurance trades that will pay out huge returns during a market collapse.

We are giving away just 99 copies of this report for FREE to the public.

To pick up yours, swing by:

http://ift.tt/1HW1LSz

Best Regards

Graham Summers

Chief Market Strategist

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

via http://ift.tt/2mdo0i9 Phoenix Capital Research

As Retail Investors Flood Into Stocks, Professionals Are Dumping Speculative Longs

"Fear of missing out" is quickly becoming the go to phrase for what's left of America's stock market investors. As The Wall Street Journal reports, investors have poured money into stocks through mutual funds and exchange-traded funds in 2017, with global equity funds posting record net inflows in the week ended March 1 based on data going back to 2000, according to fund tracker EPFR Global. Inflows continued the following week, even as the rally slowed.

“People went toe in the water, knee in the water and now many are probably above the waist for the first time,” said JJ Kinahan, chief market strategist at TD Ameritrade.

That brings individual investors increasingly in line with Wall Street professionals. A February survey of fund managers by Bank of America Merrill Lynch found optimism about the global economy improving while investors were holding above-average levels of cash, leaving room for them to drive stocks still higher.

Bullishness among Wall Street newsletter writers reached 63.1% – the highest level since 1987 – a week ago in a survey by Investors Intelligence, before falling to 57.7% this past week.

George Bohmfalk, a 69-year-old retired neurosurgeon from Charlotte, increased his stock allocation to around 80% from 70% in recent months after cutting back on bonds, saying he has faith that remaining loyal to a low-cost passively managed portfolio is more productive than trying to pick winners and losers. But he is concerned about what the Trump administration may do, and he worries about U.S. stocks’ lofty valuations.

 

“What do you do? If you take your investment out and stocks go up another 1,000 [points], you’re going to be pretty miffed,” he said. “I’m slightly concerned that there might be a pullback, but I’m not losing sleep over it.”

 

“It feels like this is a hated rally, because people are underinvested, and they’re just catching up,” said Matthew Peron, head of global equities at Northern Trust Asset Management.

 

Another retiree, Peter Gallavin, 72, of Grand Rapids, Mich., who previously worked for General Motors Co. and as regional personnel director at Delphi Corp., said he is concerned about President Donald Trump and what his policies may do to the market but remains 60% invested in stocks…

 

“I’ve been investing in the market for long enough to know that sooner or later after it comes up, it’s going to go down, but when that may or may not happen none of us know,” he said.

Even though his financial adviser warns:

“What we’ve seen in the last eight years is not going to continue,”

Perhaps they should be paying attention to the insiders (who are selling like never before)…Ned Davis Research points out that insider selling has been elevated enough to trigger his firm's in-house bearish signal for 11 weeks in a row, the longest stretch since 2014.

Insider selling is generating a “sell” signal to analysts at Ned Davis Research Inc., a research firm that uses technical analysis. Insider selling at firms whose shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq Stock Market and American Stock Exchange triggered its in-house bearish signal for 11 straight weeks, the longest stretch since 2014.

 

“The fact that we’ve gotten more selling is a sign of concern that maybe the market has gone a little too far too fast,” said Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis. “We wouldn’t be surprised if there was a modest pullback given how far the market has run.”

Insider Buys

And the utter lack of breadth in the market's most recent advance…

 

However, despite all that exuberant money flow from the FOMO-followers, not everyone's buying it as speculators have entirely erased their massive record net long position…

 

Swinging to net short for the first time since the week before the election…

 

Finaly, we note that this week saw chaos in emerging market stocks, high yield credit, Treasuries, crude, copper, Chinese money markets, and risk-parity funds… and US stocks clung to gains ahead of next week's FOMC meeting:

 

While Millennials may have been the SNAP IPO greater fools, it appears the retirees are the broad market's greatest fool, getting neck-deep in stocks at record high valuations, once again buying high, only to sell low.

via http://ift.tt/2mdo1Tf Tyler Durden

We’ve Created A Monster – Ron Paul Says It’s “Fantastic” That WikiLeaks Exposed The CIA

Ron Paul, the prominent libertarian communicator and three-time US presidential candidate, declared this week in a Fox Business interview that it is “fantastic” that WikiLeaks revealed on Tuesday thousands of US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents and files.

Speaking with host Kennedy, Paul further says that the information exposed "indicates that liberty is in big trouble" and states his concern about there having been insufficient media coverage of the information and outlines the potential dangers related to technology…

Paul's discussion raises the very crucial question "do we live in a police state?" As AntiWar's Justin Raimondo warns, the latest wikileaks revelations tell us the answer is 'Yes'.

WikiLeaks and Julian Assange would have gone down in history as the greatest enemies of government oppression of all kinds in any case, but their latest release – a comprehensive exposé of the US intelligence community’s cyberwar tools and techniques – is truly the capstone of their career. And given that this release – dubbed “Vault 7” – amounts to just one percent of the documents they intend to publish, one can only look forward to the coming days with a mixture of joyful anticipation and ominous fear.

Fear because the power of the Deep State is even more forbidding – and seemingly invincible – than anyone knew. Joyful anticipation because, for the first time, it is dawning on the most unlikely people that we are, for all intents and purposes, living in a police state. I was struck by this while watching Sean Hannity’s show last [Wednesday] night – yes, Fox is my go-to news channel – and listening to both Hannity and his guests, including the ultra-conservative Laura Ingraham, inveigh against the “Deep State.” For people like Hannity, Ingraham, and Newt Gingrich (of all people!) to be talking about the Surveillance State with fear – and outrage – in their voices says two things about our current predicament: 1) Due to the heroic efforts of Julian Assange in exposing the power and ruthlessness of the Deep State, the political landscape in this country is undergoing a major realignment, with conservatives returning to their historic role as the greatest defenders of civil liberties, and 2) American “liberalism” – which now champions the Deep State as the savior of the country –   has become a toxic brew that is fundamentally totalitarian.

On the first point: yes, there are more than a few holdouts, like Bill O’Reilly and the neocons, but the latter are increasingly isolated, and the former is increasingly irrelevant. What we are seeing, as the role of the “intelligence community” in basically leading a seditious conspiracy against a sitting President is revealed, is a complete switch in the political polarities in this country: what passes for the “left” has become the biggest advocate of the Surveillance State, and the rising populist right is coming to the hard-won conclusion that we are rapidly becoming a police state.

Ah, but wait! That’s not the whole story: bear with me for a while.

The material in “Vault 7” is extensive: it ranges from examining the ways in which a Samsung television set that is seemingly turned off can be– and no doubt has been – used to spy on the conversations and activities of a room’s occupants, to the various ways in which our spooks infiltrate and subvert common electronic devices, such as the I-Phone, in order to gather information. “Infected phones,” we are told in the introduction to the material, “can be instructed to send the CIA the user’s geolocation, audio and text communications as well as covertly activate the phone’s camera and microphone.” The CIA is even working on remotely controlling the electronic steering systems installed in cars – a perfect route to pulling off an assassination that looks like an “accident.” Not that the intelligence services of the “leader of the Free World” would ever consider such an act.

The massive infection of commonly used software and electronic devices leads to a major problem: proliferation. As these viruses and other invasive programs are unleashed on an unsuspecting public, they fall into the hands of a variety of bad actors: foreign governments, criminals, and teenagers on a lark (not necessarily in descending order of malevolence). This plague is being spread over the Internet by a veritable army of CIA hackers: “By the end of 2016,” WikiLeaks tells us, “the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other ‘weaponized’ malware.” The inevitable end result: a world infected with so much malware that computers become almost useless – and this parlous condition is paid for by you, the American taxpayer.

This is, in effect, the cybernetic equivalent of the Iraq war – an invasion that led to such unintended consequences as the rise of ISIS, the devastation of Syria, and the empowerment of Iran. In short, a war that made us less safe.

One aspect of the Vault 7 data dump that’s drawing particular attention is the CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s “Umbrage group,” which, we are told, “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.” The idea is to mask the Agency’s cyberwar operations by attempting to hide the unique forensic attributes of its techniques. The process of attribution, WikiLeaks explains, is “analogous to finding the same distinctive knife wound on multiple separate murder victims. The unique wounding style creates suspicion that a single murderer is responsible. As soon one murder in the set is solved then the other murders also find likely attribution.”

So how does the CIA hide its “fingerprints”?

It simply draws on computer code used by its adversaries – and not only Russia – and inserts it into its own handcrafted malware and other invasive programs, thus leaving Russian (or Chinese, or North Korean) fingerprints on the handiwork of CIA hackers.

Now you’ll recall that the attribution of the DNC/Podesta email hacks was “proved” by the DNC’s hired hands on the basis of the supposedlyunique characteristics of the programs used by the supposed Russian hackers. One of these alleged Russians even left behind the name of Felix Dzerzhinsky – founder of the Soviet KGB – embedded in the code, hardly the height of subtlety. So now we learn that the CIA has perfected the art of imitating its rivals, mimicking the Russians – or whomever – in a perfect setup for a “false flag” scenario.

After months of the nonstop campaign to demonize the Russians as “subverting our democracy” and supposedly throwing the election to Donald Trump by hacking the DNC and Podesta, a new possibility begins to emerge. I say “possibility” because, despite the craziness that is fast becoming the norm, there has got to be a limit to it – or does there?

No, I’m not suggesting the CIA hacked the DNC and poor hapless John Podesta. Yet others are suggesting something even more explosive.

In an appearance on Sean Hannity’s Fox News television program, retired Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, a former senior intelligence officer, told the audience that he had heard from his intelligence contacts that retired NSA officials were responsible for hacking the DNC and Podesta, and then releasing the materials to WikiLeaks His co-guest, William Binney, a former NSA insider who was among the first to expose the extent of that agency’s surveillance of American citizens, agreed.

This is nothing new: Judge Andrew Napolitano said the same thing months ago. The alleged motivation was animus toward Mrs. Clinton.

Although “the Russians did it” is now the accepted conventional wisdom, which hardly anyone bothers to question anymore, the level of evidence proffered to support this conclusion has been laughably inadequate. And you’ll note that, although the CIA and the FBI, along with other intelligence agencies, advanced this hypothesis with “high confidence,” the NSA demurred, awarding it with only “moderate” confidence.

And one more thing: I found it extremely odd that, when the hacking of the DNC and John Podesta’s email was discovered, party officials refused to let the FBI and other law enforcement agencies examine either their server or Podesta’s devices. Instead, they gave it over to CrowdStrike, a private firm that regularly does business with the DNC. CrowdStrike then came out with the now-accepted analysis that it was a Russian job.

Could it be that the “explanation” for the hacking was determined in advance?

I don’t know the answer to that question. Nor do I necessarily buy Col. Shaffer’s thesis. What I’m saying is that it’s entirely possible – indeed, it is just as likely, given what we know now, as pinning the blame Vladimir Putin.

So what is the lesson of all this?

We have created a monster, a Deep State with such unchecked power, armed with such Orwellian technology, that it represents a clear and present danger to our constitutional republic. This threat is underscored not only by the latest WikiLeaks revelations, but also by the intelligence community’s intervention in our domestic politics, which has been documented in the headlines of the nation’s newspapers for the past few months.

This cancer has been allowed to grow, undiagnosed and unopposed, within the vitals of our government in the name of “national security.” Accelerated by our foreign policy of perpetual war, the national security bureaucracy has accumulated immense power, and our elected leaders have neglected to provide any oversight. Indeed, they are at its mercy.

The latest WikiLeaks revelations should be a wake-up call for all of us who want to preserve what’s left of our constitutionally-guaranteed liberties. Either we slay the monster or it will enslave us.

via http://ift.tt/2nb8usd Tyler Durden

California Is Exporting Its Poor To Texas

California exports more than commodities such as movies, new technologies and produce. As The Sacramento Bee reports, it also exports truck drivers, cooks and cashiers.

Every year from 2000 through 2015, more people left California than moved in from other states. This migration was not spread evenly across all income groups, a Sacramento Bee review of U.S. Census Bureau data found. The people leaving tend to be relatively poor, and many lack college degrees. Move higher up the income spectrum, and slightly more people are coming than going. About 2.5 million people living close to the official poverty line left California for other states from 2005 through 2015, while 1.7 million people at that income level moved in from other states – for a net loss of 800,000. During the same period, the state experienced a net gain of about 20,000 residents earning at least five times the poverty rate – or $100,000 for a family of three.

 

“There was really nothing left for me in California,” said Kundurazieff, who also writes a blog about his cats. “The cost of living was high. The rent was high. The job market was debatable.”

Not surprisingly, the state’s exodus of poor people is notable in Los Angeles and San Francisco counties, which combined experienced a net loss of 250,000 such residents from 2005 through 2015.

The leading destination for those leaving California is Texas, with about 293,000 economically disadvantaged residents leaving and about 137,000 coming for a net loss of 156,000 from 2005 through 2015. Next up are states surrounding California; in order, Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

 

Losing impoverished residents to other states is better for the state’s economy than losing wealthy residents, some experts said. But they said the migration itself is a symptom of deeper social problems largely related to how expensive California has become.

“Why are people leaving? Economic reasons, the high cost of living, are certainly a part of it,” said Hans Johnson, senior fellow at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California. “For those people (near the poverty line), California is not viable.”

By some measures, California has the highest poverty rate in the nation.

And as more and more residents leave, the burden to fund the state's welfare exuberance will fall more and more on the wealthier (that actually pay taxes). Rather than secession, perhaps it's time for the wealthy to join 'the poor' exodus and beat the crowd out of California…

George Bernard Shaw said, “A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.” In many cases Peter quietly moved away and took his money with him.

Remember when top professional golfer, Phil Michelson created quite a stir complaining about California taxes, while putting his home up for sale? He would have been better off staying quiet about his reasons. California Political Review reports:

“Tiger Woods moved from Orange County, California to Orange County, Florida. In the first year of that move, he saved $13 million in taxes. Is it worth $13 million a year taken by government to live in California? Woods said no. Now it looks like Phil Michelson is about to make the same decision. He earns $60 million a year-he would save north of $5 million a year to move to a free State, like Florida or Texas.”

And as Dennis Miller previously noted, the election of President Trump sent shock waves through much of the political class. Many public union pensions are woefully underfunded. They donated millions to Hillary Clinton’s election campaign and expected federal bailouts. They knew they could count on Mrs. Clinton; she has a great track record of rewarding her political donors. Today no one knows what the new administration will do.

In the meantime, the scramble is on. The politicians in states that have been heavily supporting Paul have a huge base, not because they have won over the hearts and minds of Peter; but rather because the working class got tired of being fleeced and left. The politicos have to find ways to make good on all their free programs. Cutting benefits will cause citizens to storm the palace. They must find ways to generate more revenue.

Brian Daniels warns us, The Growing Specter of State “Exit Taxes” as Residents Abandon High-Tax States:

“To be clear, it is not legal for states to charge a true exit tax on citizens changing their residency from one state to another (this is not the case for the federal government, which does charge a large exit tax).

So what do high-tax states do to try and prevent their residents from moving their legal residence to low- or no-tax states? In a word, they audit them.”

When a taxpayer is audited, the agency issues an assessment for unpaid taxes. It’s not “innocent until proven guilty.” You must prove they are wrong or the assessment stands.

Once you intend to leave you are of no value to the politicos. Most people do not have the means to go to court. For some, it becomes a government shakedown to extract as much wealth as they can on your way out the door.

via http://ift.tt/2nh48N9 Tyler Durden

Liberty Links 3/11/17

If you appreciate our work, and want to contribute to genuine, independent media, consider visiting our Support Page.

New Interview: I have a little bonus this week, an interview entirely about Bitcoin with Adam Meister. Adam has a daily show covering the latest in the cryptocurrency world, and it was a very fun and different experience chatting with him.

Enjoy: Bitcoin talk with Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg- 3-8-2017

Must Reads

The Deep State and the Dark Arts (Excellent article which gets better toward the end, CounterPunch)

“Civil War” Breaks Out At White House Over Trade… And Goldman Is Winning (I always warned Trump was in bed with Wall Street, Zerohedge)

Leading Putin Critic Warns of Xenophobic Conspiracy Theories Drowning U.S. Discourse and Helping Trump (Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept)

Why the Russia Story Is a Minefield for Democrats and the Media (Rolling Stone)

Who is Judge Gorsuch? (Many good questions posed, Just Security)

Former NSA Whistleblower: “Trump Is Absolutely Right, Everything Was Being Monitored” (Zerohedge)

How Millions of Kids are Being Shaped by Know-It-All Voice Assistants (The Washington Post)

Marijuana Could Hold the Key to Treating Alzheimer’s but Drug Laws Stand in the Way, Say Scientists (The Independent)

U.S. Politics

See More Links »

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2mxPT8c
via IFTTT

The Very Strange State Of The Market

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Last week I reviewed Why This Market Reminds Me Of 1999:

“While there is much hope the new President, and his newly minted cabinet, will “Make America Great Again,” there can be a huge difference between expectations and reality. And, like in 1999, there is just the simple realization that eventually excesses will mean revert.

 

But like I said, with only a 6-month holding periods, fundamentals ‘need not apply.’

 

So, while I don’t like chart price comparisons in general, if you take the sum of the economic and fundamental data above and compare it to previously ‘overly exuberant’ periods, you see this:”

Note: S&P 500 has been indexed to 100 to compare price movement during the 1200 trading days measured. 

This past week, several areas of the market began to unravel.

First, the bond market was hit hard as expectations of a Fed rate hike next week sent money scurrying out of bonds.

However, this recent pop in rates, when combined with a stronger dollar which drags on corporate exports (roughly 40% of earnings), has historically been an excellent opportunity to add to bond exposure. As shown below, the Federal Reserve, in their eagerness to hike rates, are once again likely walking into an “economic trap.” 

Also, whatever causes the next reversal in rates will coincide with an unwinding of the still very massive speculative net short in bonds.

I agree with Albert Edwards on his discussion of rates.

“Make no mistake. Unlike most in the markets, I remain a secular bond bull and do not think this 35 year long bull bond market is over. I believe the US Fed has created another massive credit bubble that will, when it bursts, lay the global economy very low indeed. Combine this with the problems of a Chinese economy dependent on increasingly ineffective injections of credit to produce increasingly pedestrian GDP growth and you have a right global mess. The 2007/8 Global Financial Crisis will look like a soft-landing when the Fed blows this sucker sky high. The seeds for that debacle have already been sown with the Fed having presided over one of the biggest corporate credit bubbles in US history. All that is needed now is for the Fed to sprinkle life-giving rate hikes onto these, as yet dormant, seeds of destruction. Accelerated Fed rate hikes will cause tremors in the Treasury bond markets, forcing rates up, most especially in the 2 year – just like 1994. But as yet another central bank-inspired global recession unfolds, I  believe US 10y bond yields will ultimately converge with Japanese and European yields well below zero – in other words, buy 10y bonds on weakness!”

Of course, it isn’t JUST the Federal Reserve hiking rates which pose a risk to the markets. There is also this little problem that suggests rates will remain low for a very long time to come.

Secondly the oil market. As I discussed a few weeks ago:

“Crude oil positioning is also highly correlated to overall movements of the S&P 500 index. With crude traders currently more ‘long’ than at any other point in history, a reversal will likely coincide with both a reversal in the S&P 500 and oil prices being pushed back towards $40/bbl. “

Of course, with oil companies rushing out to increase drilling following the recent pop in oil prices, it was only a function of time until someone woke up to the reality of the build in still bloated inventories. (Also, despite President Trump’s exuberance over the building of the XL Pipeline, the last thing oil companies need right now is another 800,000/bbl’s a day in supply.)

Importantly, despite the recent decline in oil, the massive net-long position in oil remains which suggests further downside in the weeks ahead.

This is important because the rise in oil prices has been the support for:

  • A big chunk of the earnings recovery.
  • Increased rig counts have fueled employment (along with the unseasonably warm winter skewing the manufacturing employment data)
  • The increases in inflationary pressures have come primarily from healthcare costs, rent and increased energy costs. (Which is why the Fed’s rate hikes may cause a problem.)

As I have discussed in past missives, the detachment between oil prices and the underlying fundamentals pose a significant threat to those that piled into energy-related stocks in recent months. With everyone on the long-side of the energy trade, the reversal will likely be brutal.

(Note: The chart below contains my June 2014 call to get out of oil/energy related stocks. With the massive long position in oil prices, the long-term correction is likely not yet complete.)

Third, the spike in rates also impacted other interest rate sensitive sectors of the market which have been performing well since the beginning of the year.

REIT’s, Staples, Utilities, Preferred Stocks and, of course, Bonds were all hit hard this past week.

However, despite all of this reversions eruption of activity, the markets remained relatively unfazed with volatility remaining suppressed. As Mark DeCambre wrote on Thursday:

“Buoyancy. That is what this indefatigable equity market has come to be known for over a four month stretch that has failed to yield a decline of at least 1% for either the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones Industrial Average. That is 102 trading sessions dating back to Oct. 11.”

While it’s not a record, it is an extremely long time for volatility to remain suppressed. As shown in the chart below, such complacency does not, and has not, lasted forever. I have included the 10-year Treasury rate as spikes in the VIX, which have corresponded with declines in stocks, have also correlated to declines in interest rates as money rotates from “risk” to “safety.” 

This is a very strange state in the market currently. 

No matter what happens, seemingly there is little concern. But it is that lack of concern that historically turned out to be the problem.

With the debt ceiling debate, Fed rate hike and Dutch elections all coming to fruition next week, there are plenty of potential catalysts to create a pick up in volatility.

We lifted some profits out of portfolios last week which has been helpful in lowering portfolio volatility. However, depending on what happens this coming week, there may be more work that needs to be done.


Insiders Aren’t Buying It

Chris Dieterich and Ben Eisen had a very interesting piece in the WSJ hitting on a most important issue.

However, before we get into their analysis, let me remind you of something.

The whole premise of the “Trump Rally” is that lower tax rates, lower regulations, and infrastructure spending is going to juice earnings of companies and drive asset prices higher.

If that is the case then how do you explain this:

“Corporate executives are buying their own firms’ shares at the slowest pace in at least 29 years, the latest sign of uncertainty as the bull market in U.S. stocks enters its ninth year.

 

Share purchases and sales by executives are parsed by investors searching for signals about what insiders expect from the market. Sales can show wariness about valuations, while purchases can signal confidence that more gains lie ahead.

 

Insider buyers have been scant. There were a total of 279 insider buyers in January, the lowest number going back to 1988, according to the Washington Service, a provider of insider-trading data and analytics.”

Meanwhile, the number of sellers has been above average, pushing a ratio of buyers to sellers in February to its lowest since 1988.

 

Insider caution about buying stocks comes with the S&P 500 near a high and after the index has more than tripled since bottoming during the financial crisis on March 9, 2009.

 

While many investors expect corporate earnings to pick up in coming quarters, reflecting the continuing U.S. economic recovery and Trump administration tax-cut and deregulatory plans, the strong market gains mean that investors are paying more now for expected corporate earnings than at any point in over a decade.

 

The price-to-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 based on analyst forecasts for the next year is near 17.7, the highest since 2004, according to FactSet.”

Of course, valuations are a key issue going forward as:

“What you pay today, has everything about what your return on investment is tomorrow.” 

As Ed Yardeni recently noted:

“Putting all these trends together in our Blue Angels charts shows that the market is certainly flying high. Valuations suggest that stock prices are too high.”

So, in other words, if they aren’t buying the rally – should you be?

Just a thought.

via http://ift.tt/2nqK2iE Tyler Durden

Trump Fires US Attorney Preet Bharara After Refusing To Resign

The speculation over whether Trump would or would not fire the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, who earlier reportedly said he would not resign on his own, came to a close a 2:29pm ET when Preet Bharara, tweeting from his private Twitter account, announced he had been fired.

“I did not resign. Moments ago I was fired. Being the US Attorney in SDNY will forever be the greatest honor of my professional life.”

Bharara’s dismissal ended an “extraordinary” showdown in which a political appointee who was named by Mr. Trump’s predecessor, President Barack Obama, declined an order to submit a resignation.

“I did not resign. Moments ago I was fired. Being the US Attorney in SDNY will forever be the greatest honor of my professional life,” Mr. Bharara wrote on his personal Twitter feed, which he set up in the last two weeks. Bharara was among 46 holdover Obama appointees who were called by the acting deputy attorney general on Friday and told to immediately submit resignations and plan to clear out of their offices. But Bharara, who was called to Trump Tower for a meeting with the incoming president in late November 2016, declined to do so.

As reported previously, Bharara said he was asked by Trump to remain in his current post at the meeting. Bharara met with Trump at Trump Tower, and then addressed reporters afterward. Before the firing, one of New York’s top elected Republicans voiced support for Bharara on Saturday.

The Southern District of New York, which Bharara has overseen since 2009, encompasses Manhattan, Trump’s home before he was elected president, as well as the Bronx, Westchester, and other counties north of New York City. Last weekend, Trump accused Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in Manhattan, an allegation which various Congressmen have said they will launch a probe into.

And now the speculation will begin in earnest why just three months after Bharara, who at the time was conducting a corruption investigation into NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio as well as into aides of NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo, told the press that Trump had asked him to “stay on” he is being fired and whether this may indicate that the NYSD has perhaps opened a probe into Trump himself as some have speculated. For more on the unexpected break between the two, read here.

Earlier on Saturday, ProPublica’s Jesse Eisinger proposed some good ideas in tweet format over the tension between Trump and Bharara, as follows:

  1. The Preet Bharara drama began with a mystery: Why did Trump ask him to stay on in November, after their meeting in Trump Tower?
  2. Why would Trump ask @USAttyBharara, an ostensibly tough US attorney and–more importantly here– former Schumer aide, to stay on?
  3. Was Schumer making a deal? Trump & Schumer go way back in NY politics. What was @PreetBharara going to do in return?
  4. Maybe Trump liked that @PreetBharara going after high-profile NY Dems. Maybe he thought it would look worse for his appointee to do so.
  5. Or maybe Trump just liked the cut of @PreetBharara’s jib and made the decision in a split-second, on instinct.
  6. So what’s changed? Did SDNY start some kind of investigation of Trump? Is Preet collateral damage in Trump’s war vs the bureaucracy?
  7. & what does this mean for ongoing Cuomo & DeBlasio investigations? Would indictments from, say, USAtty Marc Mukasey be viewed the same?
  8. That is, if Trump actually fires @USAttyBharara, who then becomes just @PreetBharara.
  9. And is Trump launching the political career of @PreetBharara by martyring him?
  10. Irrespective, it’s great for @USAttyBharara, who didn’t prosecute Wall St banks after the finl crisis & suffered no reputational damage.

To be sure, moments after the resignation, some of Trump’s most vocal opponents promptly took the president to task over the decision:

via http://ift.tt/2nr1GTl Tyler Durden