Democratic Candidate For Illinois AG Mugged At Gunpoint During Chicago Photo Shoot

A Democrat running for Illinois attorney general was robbed at gunpoint Thursday afternoon during a promotional photo shoot for his campaign.

asd
Aaron Goldstein

Aaron Goldstein, 42, and four men associated with the photo shoot were approached by three suspects between 20 and 24 years old in broad daylight, when one of them produced a gun. The men robbed Goldstein and the others of camera equipment and their cellular phones before running off, said law enforcement. 

Police did not release a detailed description of the suspects for some undisclosed reason. 

Campaign manager Robert Murphy, who was not with the team during the incident, said Goldstein, Democratic ward committeeman for the 33rd Ward and a resident of Albany Park, was taking promotional images for the campaign with an “in-the-neighborhood kind of” message.

Goldstein and the others weren’t harmed in the robbery, and they were later assured by police that the robbery wasn’t a targeted act, Murphy said.

“So, as far as the campaign, we are moving forward,” Murphy said. “Basically, this was a totally a random act of violence in the community. But when it happens to you, of course, you’re shooken up.

“He says he’s fine, and he was concerned about everyone else instead of how he is – but that’s just how he is.”

Goldstein, a 33rd Ward Democratic committeeman and supervising attorney at the Cook County Public Defender’s Office, is one of eight candidates running in the Democratic primary for Illinois attorney general.

Goldstein thanked people for their concern, and said his team and he are “all good.” 

Goldstein is lucky he wasn’t yet another victim of Chicago’s horrendous murder rate

asd

via RSS http://ift.tt/2B56aVX Tyler Durden

More Than 100 Now Dead As Worst Flu Epidemic In Years Sweeps Across US

Authored by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

This flu season is already off to a record-setting beginning, and many believe that it could ultimately be the worst that we have seen in decades.  In fact, it has been reported that if we stay on this current pace that this could truly be the worst flu season in more than 50 years.  As you will see below, the CDC is reporting widespread flu activity from coast to coast, and the death toll has already crossed 100.  Here in the United States, flu season usually begins in October and ends in May, and so we still have a long way to go before it is over.

 

http://ift.tt/2B49GA5

Normally the mainstream media tries very hard to keep the public calm about these things, but even the Washington Post admits that we are having “a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad flu season”

The nation is having a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad flu season.

Flu is widespread in 46 states, according to reports to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Nationally, as of mid-December, at least 106 people had died of the infectious disease.

Usually a flu outbreak is centered in one portion of the country, but this one is different.  According to the CDC, this outbreak is affecting the entire nation, and the number of cases climbed another 5.8 percent within the past week…

“Flu is everywhere in the US right now,” said Dr. Dan Jernigan, director of the CDC’s influenza branch. “This is the first year we’ve had the entire continental US at the same level (of flu activity) at the same time.” It has been an early flu season that seems to be peaking now, he said, with a 5.8% increase in laboratory-confirmed cases this week over last.

Most people that get the flu don’t die, but it is very important for all of us to understand that this is a very serious outbreak.

In California, things have already gotten so bad that some hospitals have started to run out of Tamiflu

California has been particularly hard hit, with at least 27 deaths of people under 65 attributed to the flu, according to reports. As the number of cases continues to climb there, hospitals are beginning to run out of Tamiflu, the anti-viral medication used to treat the illness.

If you live in an area where the flu is running rampant, it may be wise to avoid public areas for a while.  Unfortunately, the vast majority of us cannot do that.  Most Americans have work or school commitments that cannot be avoided, and the flu can often spread very rapidly in those environments.

Back during the bird flu scare a few years ago, some schools actually closed for a time, and we are starting to see that happen again.  For example, one school down in Texas had a “flu day” on Friday…

A school in San Antonio will be closed Friday for a “flu day” amid an outbreak of influenza.

“While closed, our school will be launching a Super Clean of each classroom for the health of our faculty, staff and students,” San Antonio Christian School posted on Facebook.

Texas has been especially hard-hit by the flu this season, topping Walgreens’ Flu Index, which compiles data from prescriptions used to treat the virus’ symptoms.

Every year the authorities relentlessly promote the flu shot, but large numbers of people that got the flu shot this year are getting sick anyway.

Sadly, the flu shot is not likely to protect you from the very powerful strains of the flu that are dominant this flu season.  In fact, the experts are telling us that the flu shot was only “around 10 percent” effective during the flu season in Australia this year…

U.S. flu specialists say they won’t completely know how powerful this present season’s antibody is until the point that the season is finished. In any case, Australia’s experience recommends viability was just around 10 percent. In the United States, it is 40 to 60 percent powerful in a normal season. Immunizations are less defensive if strains are not the same as anticipated and if sudden transformations happen.

Hopefully everyone out there is stocking up on Vitamin C and echinacea.  We still have more than two months of winter left, and the spread of the flu appears to be accelerating.

If you do get sick, please stay home and don’t expose others.  Many of us like to try to battle through an illness, and in the process we can inadvertently share it with others.

Eventually this flu epidemic will pass, but for now we need to be smart as we weather this storm.

*  *  *

Michael Snyder is a pro-Trump candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his official website. His new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2Dd4ekc Tyler Durden

Welcome To The “Crypto Castle”: This Is How Bitcoin Millionaires Spend Their Fortunes

Lamborghinis. Diamond-encrusted jewelry fashioned into the shape of the bitcoin logo. Large homes converted into communal living spaces. These are just some of the things that the newly minted bitcoin millionaires of San Francisco spend their fortunes on – well, the comparatively small fragment that they feel comfortable spending.

In a feature story for the New York Times, longtime tech reporter Nellie Bowles chronicles the lives of some of bitcoin’s earliest and most fanatical devotees. Many of these people – men in their earlier 20s (men control more than 90% of extant bitcoin wealth, the Times notes) – are committed to furthering the “blockchain revolution” that they believe will reshape the world.

But for now, at least, many of them are hunkered down in living spaces with nicknames like “The crypto castle”, where they’re working on startups and telling anybody who will listen to invest.

 

http://ift.tt/2B4dKAc

At “the Crypto Castle”, a popular nickname for the house in San Francisco owned by 25-year-old Jeremy Gardner lives. Garder, who helped found the well-known crypto startup Augur, specializes in ICOs, he told the Times.

“I do ICOs, it’s my thing,” he said. “It’s me, a couple VCs and a lot of charlatans.”

Gardner recently led an ICO for Augur, one of the first wave of crypto startups. The company’s initial mission was to build a decentralized forecasting market that is supposed to run on top of Ethereum’s platform. For a time, the token’s market capitalization exceeded $1 billion.

Crypto Castle is exactly what one might expect: One of the bedrooms has a stripper pole. The denizens appear to live on snacks like Cheez-Its and jars of Nutella.

At the home, there’s talk about moving to Puerto Rico, where bitcoiners can more easily shield their riches from the federal government.

“They’re going to build a modern-day Atlantis out there,” he said. “But for me, it’s too early in my career to check out.”

The other trappings of tech wealth are immediately evident: For example, Gardner wears a bracelet from his Burning Man camp.

Gardner says he’s gotten offers to star in his own reality TV show. But he’s skeptical about accepting.

“I literally have a date with Bella Hadid not having a reality show,” he said, referring to the model and daughter of “Real Housewives” star Yolanda Hadid.

When the price of bitcoin exploded in December, eventually peaking at around $20,000, Gardner says things started getting weird: People started making pilgrimages to the crypto castle, hoping Gardner could teach them how to invest.

All of this hype has led Gardner to believe that the massive correction-crash could be imminent.

“Nothing feels real, it doesn’t feel real,” he said.

“I’m ready for crypto assets to go down 90%. I’ll feel better then, I think. This has been too insane.”

A few blocks away, is another communal living space known as the crypto crackhouse.

Grant Hummer, who runs the San Francisco Ethereum Meetup, lives there. Long hallways called Bitcoin Boulevard and Ethereum Alley lead to communal bathrooms. Mr. Hummer and his co-founder committed $40 million of their own crypto-made money to their new $100 million hedge fund, Chromatic Capital.

“My neurons are fried from all the volatility,” Mr. Hummer said. “I don’t even care at this point. I’m up to it. I’ll lose a million dollars in a day and I’m like, OK.”

His room is simple: A bed, a futon, a TV on a mostly empty media console, three keyboard cleaning sprays and a half dozen canisters of Lysol wipes. His T-shirt read, “The Lizard of Wall Street,” with a picture of a lizard in a suit, dollar-sign necklaces around its neck. He carries with him a coin that reads, “memento mori,” to remind himself he can die any day. He sees the boom as part of a global apocalypse.

“The worse regular civilization does and the less you trust, the better crypto does,” Mr. Hummer said. “It’s almost like the ultimate short trade.”

Every individual interviewed by Nellie Bowles for the story, it seemed, was in the process of starting their own crypto hedge fund.

Another interesting commonality is the significance that Lamborghinis have within the San Francisco crypto clique.

One member, Joe Buttram, a former MMA fighter, told Bowles that his interests in purchasing vintage pornography and frequenting message boards like 4Chan eventually led him to cryptocurrency.

They talk about buying Lamborghinis, the single acceptable way to spend money in the Ethereum cryptocurrency community. The currency’s founder frequently appears in fan art as Jesus with a Lamborghini. Mr. Buttram says he’s renting an orange Lambo for the weekend. And he wears a solid gold Bitcoin “B” necklace encrusted with diamonds that he had made. Otherwise, HODL.

This is one of the core beliefs in this community: HODL, “hold” typed very fast, as if in a panic. HODL even if you feel FUD – fear, uncertainty and doubt. If you show wealth, it means you don’t really believe in the cryptocurrency revolution, a full remake of the financial system, governments and our world order that will send the price of ether up astronomically.

“HODL when everyone has FUD,” Mr. Hummer said quietly, to explain why he still lives in a dorm room. “This will change civilization. This can 100x or more from here.”

James Fickel, 26, is widely recognized within the crypto community for investing $400,000 when Ethereum was at 80 cents.

Now, with a fortune he says is in the hundreds of millions, his parents have retired and sent his younger sister to live with him.

“I’m taking over her education,” Mr. Fickel said, sitting on a white leather sofa, Mr. Bigglesworth asleep in his impossibly skinny arms.

Today, Mr. Fickel is outlining the endgame for cryptocurrency true believers.

Many members of the clique, including Fickel and Buttram, firmly believe that blockchain will revolutionize the world.

Others are more skeptical.

“All I know is the price of Ethereum is going up,” Hummer said.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2EJN7mr Tyler Durden

Here’s What Historically Happens To Stocks When Bull Markets End

Authored by Jeff Clark via GoldSilver.com,

You undoubtedly know that 2017 was a record-setting year for the broad stock markets. And while gold was up last year despite numerous headwinds, most mainstream investors aren’t paying much attention to gold since they keep seeing so much green in their stock portfolios. 

Even I was taken back by some of the data from the bull market in stocks…

  • The Dow hit a record high 71 times last year. On average, a new high was hit more frequently than once a week.

  • For the first time ever in its almost 90-year history, the S&P 500 rose every month in 2017. And historically there have only been four years with gains in 11 months of the year.

  • The S&P’s largest pullback in 2017 was 2.8%, the smallest since 1995.

  • To start 2018, the S&P 500 has risen in each of the five trading sessions, hitting a new record high every day. The last time the index opened the year with at least five straight record highs was 1964.

  • And as Mike pointed out in his 2018 predictions, the CAPE (Cyclically Adjusted Price-Earnings) ratio has now matched its 1999 level, the second highest reading in over 100 years of data. The CAPE now has a higher reading only in 1929.

This all begs the question: is the bull market about to come to an end? This is exactly the kind of frothy behavior a market sees near its apex, so it’s definitely a prudent question to ask. If last year ends up being the top of this bull market, what does history say could happen to stocks this year?

We dug up the data for all bull markets in the S&P since the year 1900, and then examined what happened in the very first year after each of those bull markets ended. In other words, what did the first year of the bear market look like after the last full year of the bull market? This could be useful data, if 2017 ends up being the peak of the bull market.

Here’s what history shows.

First Year Performance of Bear Market After Bull Market Ends

 

http://ift.tt/2mGrGMA

While the declines for the first year of the bear market varied greatly, you can see that on average, the S&P lost 16% the year immediately following the last year of the bull market. Also notice that in only four cases was the decline measured in single digits—all others were double digit losses.

Mike Maloney believes this is the year overvalued stocks begin their descent. If he’s right, the decline could be higher than the historical average, since this is the second longest bull market in history. 

And what is gold likely to do in that environment? We’ve shown before that gold has acted as a buffer—and gained ground—in most of the biggest stock market crashes. 

The bottom line for us is that we think a major shift is coming, not just in overpriced stock and bond and real estate markets, but in the currencies that have been abused by many central bankers the world over. Once the process gets underway, the mainstream will turn back to mankind’s oldest form of money in mass, and our patience and forethought will pay off.

Mike and I continue to buy physical gold and silver.

If you’d like to follow our lead, you can pre-order 2018 gold Eagles and silver Eagles now, with both estimated to ship on January 19.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2mIa2YK Tyler Durden

Watch A Sitting Congresswoman Shred The MSM Narrative In Under A Minute

Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard appeared on multiple Sunday news shows a day after her state’s false ICBM emergency alert sent the islands into a tense 40 minutes of panic before it was revealed to be a message sent in error, where she slammed the mainstream media’s reporting on the North Korean nuclear threat, saying“We’ve got to understand that North Korea is holding onto these nuclear weapons because they think it is their only protection from the United States coming in and doing to them what the United States has done to so many countries throughout history.” 

She further called for Trump to hold direct talks with Kim Jong Un in order to prevent the real thing from ever happening. 

awd

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) Gabbard is an Army reserve officer who previously served two tours in the Middle East, including in Iraq. Image via the Ron Paul Institute

On Saturday Gabbard had immediately criticized President Trump for mishandling North Korea, taking to MSNBC to proclaim that “our leaders have failed us. Donald Trump is taking too long… he’s not taking this [nuclear] threat seriously…” During Sunday interviews she elaborated on a plan of action, advising Trump to enter talks with Pyongyang which should “happen without preconditions” and that Trump should “sit across the table from Kim Jong Un” in order stamp out the climate of fear which contributed to the “unacceptable” alert issued on Saturday. 

“We’ve got to get to the underlying issue here of why are the people of Hawaii and this country facing a nuclear threat coming from North Korea today, and what is this President doing urgently to eliminate that threat?” Gabbard said on CNN’s State of the Union. She added that Pyongyang sees its nuclear weapons program as “the only deterrent against the U.S. coming in and overthrowing their regime there” after decades of the US exhibiting a pattern of regime change when dealing with rogue states, which she said makes setting up preconditions for talks a self-defeating step.

And concerning the potential for an “unintentional” nuclear war, Gabbard said, “It’s not just the President making a decision to launch a nuclear weapon. It’s these kinds of mistakes that we have seen happen in the past that bring us to this brink of nuclear war that could be unintentional.”

The Hawaii lawmaker, who has garnered a lot of attention over her non-interventionist stance on Syria while angering establishment pundits for doing things like visiting Damascus last yearon a fact-finding mission, left ABC’s George Stephanopoulos visibly flustered during an interview on Sunday’s “This Week”. She said:

We know that North Korea has these nuclear weapons because they see how the United States in Libya for example guaranteed Gadaffi – ‘we’re not going to go after you, you should get rid of your nuclear weapons.’ He did, then we went and led an attack that toppled Gaddafi, launching Libya into chaos that we are still seeing the results of today. North Korea sees what we did in Iraq with Saddam Hussein, with those false reports of weapons of mass destruction. And now seeing in Iran how President Trump is decertifying a nuclear deal that prevented Iran from developing their nuclear weapons, threatening the very existence and the agreement that was made. 

At this point an incredulous Stephanopoulos stopped the Congresswoman and asked, “Was it a mistake for the United States to take out Gaddafi and Hussein?” Gabbard responded firmly with, “It was, absolutely.”  Apparently this was enough to end the interview as a presumably shocked Stephanopoulos had no response at that point.

For those unfamiliar, Gabbard is an Army reserve officer who previously served two tours in the Middle East, including in Iraq, and has been an outspoken critic of regime change and Washington’s interventionist foreign policy. 

via RSS http://ift.tt/2FEjG6B Tyler Durden

Government’s Misconduct In Cliven Bundy Case Stems From Ruby Ridge

Authored by James Bovard, op-ed via The Hill,

Federal judge Gloria Navarro slammed the FBI and Justice Department on Monday, Jan. 8, for “outrageous” abuses and “flagrant misconduct” in the prosecution of Cliven Bundy and sons, the Nevada ranchers who spurred a high-profile standoff with the FBI and Bureau of Land Management in 2014.

Navarro condemned the “grossly shocking” withholding of evidence from defense counsel in a case that could have landed the Bundys in prison for the rest of their lives. Navarro, who had declared a mistrial last month, dismissed all charges against the Bundys.

http://ift.tt/2D5AKRg

Navarro was especially riled because the FBI spent three years covering up or lying about the role of their snipers in the 2014 standoff. The Bundys faced conspiracy charges because they summoned militia to defend them after claiming FBI snipers had surrounded their ranch. Justice Department lawyers scoffed at this claim but newly-released documents vindicate the Bundys. In an interview Saturday, Ammon Bundy reviled the feds:

“They basically came to kill our family, they surrounded us with snipers. And then they wanted to lie about it all like none of it happened.”

Many of the heavily-armed activists who flocked to the scene feared that the FBI snipers had a license to kill the Bundys.

Their reaction cannot be understood without considering a landmark 1990s case that continues to shape millions of Americans’ attitude towards Washington: the federal killings and coverups at Ruby Ridge.

Randy Weaver and his family lived in an isolated cabin in the mountains of northern Idaho. Weaver was a white separatist who believed races should live apart; he had no record of violence against other races — or anyone else. An undercover federal agent entrapped him into selling a sawed-off shotgun. The feds then sought to pressure Weaver to become an informant but he refused.

After Weaver was sent the wrong court date and failed to show up, the feds launched a vendetta. Idaho lawyer David Nevin noted that U.S.:

“Marshals called in military aerial reconnaissance and had photos studied by the Defense Mapping Agency. They prowled the woods around Weaver’s cabin with night-vision equipment. They had psychological profiles performed and installed $130,000 worth of long-range solar-powered spy cameras. … They even knew the menstrual cycle of Weaver’s teenage daughter, and planned an arrest scenario around it.”

On August 21, 1992, six camouflaged U.S. Marshals carrying machine guns trespassed onto the Weavers’ property. Three marshals circled close to the Weaver cabin and killed one of their dogs. A firefight ensued and 14-year old Sammy Weaver was shot in the back and killed as he was leaving the scene. Kevin Harris, a family friend, responded by fatally shooting a federal marshal who had fired seven shots in the melee.

The next day, the FBI sent in its Hostage Rescue Team snipers with orders to shoot to kill any adult male outside the Weaver cabin. A federal appeals court ruling later noted that:

“FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently unconstitutional for a police action.”

FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi shot Randy Weaver in the back after he stepped out of his cabin, wounding him. Horiuchi then shot and killed Vicki Weaver standing in the cabin door holding their 10-month old baby. A confidential 1994 Justice Department task force report concluded:

“The absence of a (surrender demand) subjected the Government to charges that it was setting Weaver up for attack.”

Weaver and Harris surrendered after an 11-day siege. At their 1993 trial, federal prosecutors asserted that Weaver long conspired to have an armed confrontation with the government. The feds bizarrely asserted that moving from Iowa to a spot near the Canadian border in 1985 was part of Weaver’s plot. After an Idaho jury largely exonerated the defendants, federal judge Edward Lodge slammed DOJ and FBI misconduct and fabrication of evidence in the case.

Regardless of the judge’s condemnation, FBI chief Louis Freeh in 1995 exonerated the FBI for its actions at Ruby Ridge. That year, after I slammed Freeh’s whitewash in the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere, Freeh denounced my “inflammatory and unfounded allegations.” Five months later, I snared a confidential 542-page Justice Department report on Ruby Ridge, excerpting its damning findings in a Wall Street Journal piece. The coverup unraveled and the feds paid the Weaver family $3.1 million to settle their wrongful-death lawsuit. A top FBI official was sent to prison for destroying key evidence.

But the FBI sniper who killed Vicki Weaver never faced justice. When Boundary County, Idaho, sought to prosecute Horiuchi in 1998, the Clinton administration invoked the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution (which blocks local and state governments from challenging federal power) to torpedo their lawsuit. Solicitor General Seth Waxman absolved the sniper because “federal law-enforcement officials are privileged to do what would otherwise be unlawful if done by a private citizen.”

While that claim may sway federal judges, it often fails to charm jurors. A Justice Department brief in the Bundy case revealed that prosecutors dreaded jury nullification — “not guilty” verdicts due to government abuses. That specter spurred prosecutors to withhold key evidence from both the court and the defense counsel, resulting in a mistrial and dismissal of charges.

Judge Navarro rightly declared that “a universal sense of justice has been violated” by federal misconduct in the Bundy trial. Americans’ trust in the FBI and Justice Department will not be restored until those agencies are compelled to obey the law and the Constitution. Until that happens, federal prosecutors should continue fearing verdicts from Americans who refuse to convict those whom the feds wrongfully vilify.

*  *  *

James Bovard is a USA Today columnist and the author of 10 books, including “Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty” (St. Martin’s Press, 1994).

via RSS http://ift.tt/2EKygbs Tyler Durden

Ron Paul: “Who Killed Martin Luther King… And Why?”

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s own closest advisors begged him to avoid focusing on the Vietnam war.

It will alienate President Johnson, who is doing so much for the civil rights movement at home, they argued.

As Ron Paul and Daniel McAdams discuss below, MLK ignored his advisors, vocally opposed the war, and found much of the liberal establishment had turned on him (having applauded his work on civil rights in the US).

 

http://ift.tt/2DeX92y

Is that why he was assassinated?

Was challenging the US warfare state the third rail that cost MLK his life?

Source

via RSS http://ift.tt/2D8WJqz Tyler Durden

‘A Genuine Revolution of Values’…

Earlier today, I read Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s 1967 speech on Vietnam at Riverside Church. It was both uplifting and depressing.

Uplifting in the sense that he so eloquently expresses the timeless spirit necessary for humans to take the next evolutionary step forward into a more conscious paradigm. Depressing in the sense it’s crystal clear the American public quite spectacularly rejected his plea, further descending quite enthusiastically into a culture defined by depravity, violence and selfishness over the past 50 years.

While the entire speech is illuminating, the following paragraphs really connected with me on a deep level, as they reflect many of the themes I’ve been exploring over the past year or so.

A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies. 

This call for a world-wide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all men. This oft misunderstood and misinterpreted concept — so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force — has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of man. When I speak of love I am not speaking of some sentimental and weak response. I am speaking of that force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life. Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate reality. This Hindu-Moslem-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of Saint John: 

Let us love one another; for love is God and everyone that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. If we love one another God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.

Let us hope that this spirit will become the order of the day. We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation. The oceans of history are made turbulent by the ever-rising tides of hate. History is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of hate. As Arnold Toynbee says : “Love is the ultimate force that makes for the saving choice of life and good against the damning choice of death and evil. Therefore the first hope in our inventory must be the hope that love is going to have the last word.” 

We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. The “tide in the affairs of men” does not remain at the flood; it ebbs. We may cry out deperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is deaf to every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residue of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: “Too late.” There is an invisible book of life that faithfully records our vigilance or our neglect. “The moving finger writes, and having writ moves on…” We still have a choice today; nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation. 

We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world — a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act we shall surely be dragged down the long dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.

Just because humanity hasn’t evolved yet, doesn’t mean it won’t. I have great expectations for our species in the decades to come, and the path forward starts and ends with each and every one of us taking responsibility for our minds and our actions.

Below is the entire speech for your appreciation.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2DlbiLa
via IFTTT

Illinois Treasurer Shoots Self In Foot Defending Activist Social Investing

Authored by Mark Glennon via WirePoints.com,

If you’re going to claim that socially responsible investing is the right way to manage money, you might want to check the stock price before bragging about an example. Not Illinois Treasurer Michael Frerichs. He made the case against himself.

Before we get to that example, which is Facebook, here’s the background, and it’s about much more than Facebook. I wrote last week criticizing Frerichs for compromising his investment goals with political ones, which it turned out he’s doing with stock in a number of companies the state doesn’t don’t even own — stock owned by college savers in 529 programs.

Well, he took to Twitter over the weekend to defend himself, claiming “this simple and successful strategy really is about common sense and has been used for decades in the public and private sector.”

He went on to write this:

“Facebook is reversing direction and taking action to stop #fakenews. I applaud and thank fellow investors who filed joint shareholder proposals demanding that Facebook work to stop the spread of fake news, election meddling & hate speech.”

He earlier wrote three times to Facebook publicly, implicitly threatening divestiture, as one of Facebook’s “institutional investors” (which he actually isn’t).

He was referring to Facebook’s announcement, made after the close of trading on Thursday, of a new policy to address fake news.

You guessed it: The stock got slammed upon opening the next morning and ended down 4.5%…

http://ift.tt/2B3n8Ev

In fairness, maybe Facebook’s new policy will work out for shareholders in the long run. Some analysts think so. Nobody knows for sure. Frerichs certainly doesn’t. All we know for certain is the market didn’t like it and an astonishing loss resulted — over $20 billion of shareholder value was wiped out in an instant.

The losers include owners of Illinois 529 college savings accounts for which Frerichs is trustee. If they selected, for example, the large cap growth fund in that program, 4.9% of that money is in Facebook. Even if they selected the S&P 500 index fund, Facebook stock is over 1.8%. Savers in those probably think they are passive index investors, the approach many of us favor. Instead, they deputized Frerichs as social activist on their behalf.

It goes beyond Facebook. Aside from $8 billion of college savings money, Frerichs manages $16 to $20 billion of state and municipal money. He churns the daylights out of it, executing over a trillion dollars of transactions annually (that’s what he told CNBC).

And his social goals permeate his investment philosophy, at least if his website is to be believed.

So, where else are political goals, no, sorry, social goals, influencing Frerichs on the billions he manages that he hasn’t publicized? I asked, but got no answer. I also asked what legal authority he has to include social policy considerations in his investment decisions. And who determines exactly what those considerations are? No answers on those, either.

Frerichs says studies prove a good social agenda gets the best returns, but he’s referring to some studies, which are controversial, on the topic of “ESG investing” (environmental, social and governance). None that I can find encompasses Russian election meddling, fake news or opioid misuse (which is another topic Frerichs has been active on). Sure, companies with honest, transparent governance make better investments. That part of ESG seems quite plausible. But no research could possibly validate blanket authority for a politician to pursue his social issues de jeur.

Most importantly, whether social investing works just isn’t the point. Instead, the point is that nobody signed up for it, especially college savers.

One professional money manager I heard from is Robert Schmansky in Michigan, who is widely published and often criticizes 529 programs in part because they’re subject to just the kind of political games Frerichs is playing. His post on Frerichs, linked here, is particularly good. He told me:

It seems clear that the treasurer is placing social activism with your college funds as the higher priority over increasing its value. His bullying through the pretense of ESG takes political power away from the courts, legislature, executive, voters and those who disagree with him and allows him to threaten almost any company for any reason.

Mr. Frerichs has repeatedly claimed investors won’t be “harmed” by his approach that and he can provide higher returns based on “common sense” and a “simple and successful strategy used for decades.” It’s all political gibberish to provide cover for politics. It doesn’t seem to be about ESG at all. What he’s doing is simply politics to the detriment of the investors and citizens of Illinois. 

In other recent news, Illinois Senator Dan Biss, also a candidate for governor, said he thinks Illinois pension funds should start investing along the same lines — by ditching investments in “dirty energy companies.”

It just never ends in Illinois. Please, make it stop.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2D73b1e Tyler Durden

New Book Reveals That Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Was A Closet Trump Supporter

In the summer of 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, Trump vowed at the Republican National Convention to fill his seat on the Supreme Court with “a person of similar views, principles and judicial philosophies.” After the election, Trump even went so far as to credit his victory in part to promising to nominate a successor “very much in the mold of Justice Scalia,” a pledge that endeared him to a GOP base opposed to abortion rights and same-sex marriage.

Now, in a book written by one of Scalia’s long-time friends, Bryan Garner, it seems as though Scalia may have also been a secret Trump supporter.  In the book set to drop tomorrow, entitled “Nino and Me”, Garner says that Scalia respected Trump’s “unfiltered and utterly frank” language and found it to be a refreshing alternative to the “airbrushed” rhetoric of seasoned politicians. Per the Wall Street Journal:

“Justice Scalia thought it was most refreshing to have a candidate who was pretty much unfiltered and utterly frank,” said the late jurist’s literary collaborator, Bryan Garner, a legal dictionary editor who spent two weeks in 2016 traveling with Justice Scalia through several Asian countries.

The justice thought well of Scott Walker, the Wisconsin governor whose campaign for the Republican nomination stalled, said Mr. Garner, whose memoir of a decadelong friendship, “Nino and Me,” comes out Tuesday. “But he was fascinated by the fact that Trump was so outspoken in an unfiltered way, and therefore we were seeing something a little more genuine than a candidate whose every utterance is airbrushed,” Mr. Garner said in an interview.

Scalia

Of course, as we pointed out nearly two years ago now, Justice Scalia  died under somewhat mysterious circumstances.  While his death was originally attributed to “natural causes” after he allegedly died in his sleep at a luxurious hunting lodge in West Texas…

A federal official who asked not to be named said there was no evidence of foul play and it appeared that Scalia died of natural causes.

According to CNN, Scalia died in his sleep. A government official said Scalia went to bed Friday night and told friends he wasn’t feeling well. Saturday morning, he didn’t get up for breakfast. And the group he was with for a hunting trip left without him.

Someone at the ranch went in to check on him and found him unresponsive.

…the story turned somewhat more mysterious when John Poindexter, the owner of the 30,000-acre luxury ranch where Scalia died, reportedly told the San Antonio Express that Scalia was found dead in his bed with a “pillow over his head” and his “bed clothes unwrinkled”…

“We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled,” said Poindexter.

“He was lying very restfully. It looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap,” he said.

Scalia,79, did not have a pulse and his body was cold, and after consulting with a doctor at a hospital in Alpine, Poindexter concluded resuscitation would have been futile, He then contacted federal authorities, at first encountering a series of answering services because he was calling on a weekend.

Adding further to the questions surrounding the death, no autopsy was performed on Scalia.

Scalia’s death marked only the second time in sixty years that a justice died before retiring from the Court.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2B2EfGf Tyler Durden