Deal On, Risk Off

Deal On, Risk Off

The great deal ever… is done-ish. And the market’s reaction was…

Stocks gave back some of their gains from yesterday, selling on the news today…

But yuan collapsed, erasing all the gains…

Source: Bloomberg

And Treasury yields plunged, erasing all the losses from yesterday…

Source: Bloomberg

And despite the headlines of massive Ag purchases, Ag prices sold on the news too…

Source: Bloomberg

VIX was total chaos… spiking early above 14 and then getting monkeyhammered back to a 12 handle in the last hour…

Source: Bloomberg

So what did all this “phase one” trade-deal complete malarkey achieve? Stocks are up 8%; bonds, the dollar, and gold are down 2%…

Source: Bloomberg

On the week, Nasdaq outperformed and Small Caps lagged, barely holding gains…

S&P was glued back to VWAP for much of the afternoon after selling off on the ‘news’ of the deal…

Credit notably decoupled from equity protection today…

Source: Bloomberg

Treasury yields tumbled today, ending the week 1-2bps lower…

Source: Bloomberg

The Dollar fell for the 2nd week in a row, testing down to 5-month lows before a huge rebound back to unchanged today…

Source: Bloomberg

Cable rallied for the 3rd week in a row to its highest since May 2018… spiking overnight but fading back during the day

Source: Bloomberg

Cryptos bounced back a little late in the week but only Bitcoin Cash ended barely green…

Source: Bloomberg

Commodities are broadly higher on the week, buoyed by the trade deal and a weaker dollar…

Source: Bloomberg

Copper, oddly, tumbled on the day as the deal was completed… after breaking out during the early part of the week…

Gold ended the week at pre-payrolls levels…

So did Silver…

Finally, you are here…

And US economic data is at its most disappointing in over 3 months…

Source: Bloomberg

Trade accordingly!


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 16:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2LRXH0B Tyler Durden

Bianco: Mom-And-Pop Aren’t The Ones Getting Suckered By FOMO

Bianco: Mom-And-Pop Aren’t The Ones Getting Suckered By FOMO

Authored by Jim Bianco via Bloomberg.com,

The current bull market is historic. According to Goldman Sachs Group Inc., it’s been 10.7 years since the last 20% correction, the longest such run in more than 120 years. In 2019 alone, the S&P 500 Index has surged more than 25%, with recent gains being attributed in part to investors chasing performance as trade optimism lifted the market. Many on Wall Street use the acronyms FOMO (fear of missing out) and TINA (there is no alternative) to explain it.

But if there are buyers who feel compelled to pile in to stocks at this time, they don’t include retail investors. In fact, when it comes to this group — and it’s a big one — the opposite is happening. According to Refinitiv Lipper, individual investors are slated to withdraw more than $135 billion from equity mutual funds and exchange-traded funds this year, the most since they started keeping records in 1992. Meanwhile, bond mutual funds and ETFs should see record inflows of over $250 billion this year. Why aren’t these investors chasing good performance?

What we’re witnessing is a transformational shift that has been unfolding for years, one that’s also changing the very job description of the equity portfolio manager. With a good portion of American investors now aging and focused more on capital preservation than appreciation, investment flows are no longer motivated by performance, and the money trail shows it. Driving all this is the single most important influence in investing today, the modern wealth manager.

According to Investment Adviser Association, the U.S. has 13,000 registered investment advisory firms, employing more than 436,000 wealth managers and directing more than 43 million accounts with a combined net worth of nearly $84 trillion. In other words, most of the wealth in the U.S. is now being directed, or at least influenced, by a wealth manager.

The yearly survey conducted by TD Ameritrade Institutional stated that 88% of wealth managers use ETFs, the most popular investment vehicle in their arsenal. It’s estimated that two-thirds or more of all ETFs are held in accounts directed by wealth managers. It is not an understatement to say the ETF is the tool that created the wealth management industry. Prior to its creation, a wealth manager (stockbroker in days gone by) needed a large bank to back them. The ETF freed the wealth manager from this infrastructure, allowing them efficiently create client portfolios on their own. Today, half of the 13,000 wealth manager firms are one or two employees.

Now, who are the 43 million clients of wealth managers? Demographics tell us they are older, as they have the bulk of the money. They have witnessed two 50% corrections in the stock market over the last 20 years, 2001 and 2008. These events colored their outlook, so they worry more about capital preservation over appreciation. This is where the wealth manager comes in, and the overwhelming solution is a variation of the 60/40 portfolio — that is, one weighted 60% in equities and 40% in bonds.

This desire for safety is changing the face of active money management. The chart below shows the cumulative cash flows for open-ended mutual funds (the proxy for actively managed funds, in blue), ETFs (the proxy for passively managed funds, in orange) and the combination of the two (black):

Investors are running away from active managers and toward passive investment choices, as seen in the surge in ETFs. But it is more than substituting into lower cost-equity vehicles. As the black line shows, they aren’t adding to their overall equity investment holdings at all. The last five years combined has seen virtually no new money flow into the stock market. Which is to say, FOMO and TINA aren’t the way investment money moves and haven’t been for years.  

Where is the money going, then? The next chart breaks down the cumulative inflows into all long-term ETFs detailed by stock (blue) and fixed income (orange). The bottom panel (red) shows the percentage of money flowing into fixed-income ETFs.

Over the last five years, 40% of the flows into ETFs went into bond ETFs, almost perfectly tracking the 60/40 portfolio structure recommended by most wealth managers. My colleague Ben Breitholtz at Arbor Data Science detailed these flows further here.

This simple but powerful trend is changing the landscape of investing like no other post-crisis trend. The public is getting what it wants, and it wants wealth managers holding their hand and positioning them for capital preservation via a 60/40 portfolio. They aren’t performance chasers looking for the next star manager to make them rich. Fund-management companies also understand they aren’t getting paid via inflows for stock picking, so they have re-oriented toward marketing objectives to reflect this reality.

For strategists who haven’t grasped this concept and continue to look for the public to chase the hot hand, here’s a tip: That era is over.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 15:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2LQMbCX Tyler Durden

“F**k Boris” – Antifa Protesters Clash With Police Outside Downing Street As Furious Leftists Revolt

“F**k Boris” – Antifa Protesters Clash With Police Outside Downing Street As Furious Leftists Revolt

As we warned earlier, despite the Conservatives winning their largest majority since the 1980s, bitter leftists furious at the defeat of their spiritual and political leader, Jeremy Corbyn, are rallying in London, and across the country, to protest the outcome of a democratic election.

Those who still need an excuse to try and pretend like they haven’t wholly abandoned their support for Democracy (the West’s primary form of government for the past few centuries) have latched on, once again, to the Russia narrative. The notion that Russian intelligence threw its support behind Boris Johnson and Brexit, and deliberately tried to sway both the referendum and the 2019 vote has no basis in fact, yet certain American political figures are publishing op-eds trying to discredit the British electoral process.

On Friday evening, video appeared on social media of the “Not My Prime Minister” march in London, which brought protesters almost to the front steps of No. 10 Downing Street one day after their fellow Britons rejected Labour’s hard-left policies by handing it its biggest defeat since 1935. As always, legions of police were brought in to keep the peace.

As they always seem to do, a mob of Antifa thugs clad in black masks and black outfits have descended on the London rally and provoked skirmishes with the police.

Video footage shows the group of radicals clashing with police while waving a huge Antifa flag near Downing Street.

Clashes with police also broke out on Parliament Street.

Apparently, rejecting the result of an uncontested and undoubtedly fair election is a tenant of the “Democratic Socialism” they claim is so much different from regular ol’ socialism.

Many were disappointed by the site of the mobs turning parts of Central London into chaos.

“Fuck Boris” signs, a message that will no doubt feature in plenty of left-wing rallies to come, appeared in rallies in Scotland and England, according to social media chatter.

A large rally was also reported in Glasgow, where the SNP won the largest share of seats.

And since the fun never stops, more ‘Stand Up To Racism’ rallies are expected this weekend in Leeds, one of the few areas of Labour’s “Red Wall” where support held up, and elsewhere.

Ironically, one of their favorite chants was “this is what democracy looks like.”

Is it, now? Because we thought that’s what you all were doing yesterday.

If you’re looking to follow along with the chaos, the Guardian has a live feed here.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 15:40

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2rN9p63 Tyler Durden

Banana Republic Money Debasement In America

Banana Republic Money Debasement In America

Authored by MN Gordon via EconomicPrism.com,

There are many falsehoods being perpetuated these days when it comes to money, financial markets, and the economy.  But when you cut the chaff, three related facts remain: Uncle Sam needs your money.  He needs a lot of your money.  And he needs it bad!

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal budget deficit for the first two months of fiscal year 2020 is $342 billion.  This amounts to $36 billion more than the deficit recorded during the same period last year.  At this rate, Washington’s going to add over $1 trillion to the national debt in FY 2020.

Still, the figures from the CBO aren’t all bad.  Revenues in October and November of 2019 were 3 percent higher than they were in October and November of 2018.  Regrettably, outlays for these two months were 6 percent higher in 2019 than they were in 2018.

Jacks and Jennets both know from experience that taking three steps forward and six steps back is an inefficient way to lose ground.  They also know that the longer this goes on the more ground you lose.  So, too, they know that the more ground you lose the harder it is to make up.

For example, after the big three budget items – Medicare, Social Security, and Defense – comes Interest on Debt.  Presently, Interest on Debt is over $375 billion.  However, the debt is growing by over $1 trillion a year.  By this, the Treasury is losing ground.

Moreover, when interest rates rise, and as the pile of government debt approaches $40 trillion over the next decade, interest on the debt will quickly jump to well over $1 trillion.  This will put merely the interest on debt at par with expenditures for Medicare and Social Security, and well above Defense.

This is why Uncle Sam needs your money.  But how he gets your money is a recipe for disaster…

Dotards Anonymous

President Trump doesn’t want to raise taxes, especially in an election year.  He wants to cut taxes.  Because voters love tax cuts…so long as they’re not for the rich.

The proven method for a Presidential incumbent to stay in office is to cut taxes and increase spending.  And this is precisely what Trump is doing.  Spending is increasing two times faster than revenue.

So how will Uncle Sam get your money?  He’ll get it by doing more of what he’s already doing.  He’ll get it via greater and greater deficits.

When Uncle Sam expands the money supply through deficit spending he effectively dilutes wealth from the dollar.  But for Uncle Sam it doesn’t matter if he waters down the dollar to a lite beer.  He gets the newly created money first.  And he gets to spend it while the money can still lay claim to real labor and resources.

John Maynard Keynes succinctly clarified:

“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.”

In practice, the increase in the money supply leads to a reduction in purchasing power per monetary unit.  So, without levying taxes, Washington confiscates your wealth – your stored time and productivity – in return for debased money.

Still, this doesn’t solve the problem of taking three steps forward and six steps back.  Instead, it makes it worse.  As the nation ages, and the interest on the debt consumes more and more of the budget, the economy weakens like an anonymous dotard.

Yet this isn’t the half of it…

Banana Republic Money Debasement In America

You see, the U.S. debt based fiat money system, which is dependent on greater and greater issuances of Fed credit, is set up for ultimate failure and disaster.  Yet, the road to this endgame, as we discover more and more every day, is paved with madness.

This week, for example, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York – dotards of the xe/xem/xyr genderqueer pronoun identity – published their latest schedule of overnight and term repurchase agreement operations.  This, in short, lays out how much fake money they’re going to print up and give to the big banks through January 14, 2020.

Cutting through the minutia, and tabbing it up, is mind-numbing.  Fortunately, Zero Hedge – astute fellows of the he/him/his cisgender pronoun identity – were up to the task:

“According to the statement, the NY Fed will continue to offer two-week term repo operations twice per week, four of which span year end.  In addition, the Desk will also offer another longer-maturity term repo operation that spans year end.  The amount offered in this operation will be at least $50 billion…

“In addition, to prevent a cascading year-end liquidity squeeze, Fed overnight repo operations will continue to be held each day, and just to be safe, the Fed will go to town by substantially expanding their size: On December 31, 2019 and January 2, 2020, the overnight repo offering will increase to at least $150 billion to cover the ‘turn’ in a flood of overnight liquidity.  In addition, on December 30, 2019, the Desk will offer a $75 billion repo that settles on December 31, 2019 and matures on January 2, 2020.

“And just in case that’s not enough, the NY Fed’s markets desk also added that it ‘intends to adjust the timing and amounts of repo operations as needed to mitigate the risk of money market pressures that could adversely affect policy implementation, consistent with the directive from the FOMC.’

“What the Fed means is that in addition to expanding the sizes of its ‘turn’ overnight repos to $150 billion, the Fed will conduct a total of nine term repos covering the year-end turn from Dec 16 to Jan 14, 8 of which will amount to $35BN and the first will be $50BN, for a total injection of a whopping $365 billion in the coming month…

“There’s more: add in the incremental liquidity from the expanded overnight repo of about $50 billion and another $60 billion in T-Bill purchases, and the Fed will inject a total of just shy of $500 billion in the next 30 days!

“This also means that by Jan 14, the Fed’s balance sheet would have grown by a cumulative $365BN in ‘temporary’ repos, and together with the expanded overnight repos, and the $60BN in monthly TBill purchases, and by mid-January, the Fed’s balance sheet, currently at $4.066 trillion, will surpass its all time high of $4.5 trillion!”

This, without question, constitutes mass money debasement of the likes typically reserved for banana republics.  Somehow we think all this funny money is needed to keep the U.S. Treasury flush with cash.

Moreover, if this $500 billion madness is needed just to get to January 14, what madness will be needed come January 15?

Our guess: Take the current number and double it.  Then double it again.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 15:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2YIMHrR Tyler Durden

Well Known Tesla Short-Seller “Montana Skeptic” Returns For Round 2 Against Elon Musk

Well Known Tesla Short-Seller “Montana Skeptic” Returns For Round 2 Against Elon Musk

Was there even a time before “Funding Secured” and “Pedo-Gate”?

After all, it seems like just yesterday we were writing about the time Elon Musk personally called the boss of a Tesla skeptic to whine and complain about negative articles the employee was posting on Seeking Alpha about Tesla. 

That employee was, of course, now the very well known “Montana Skeptic”. 

Around the same time, last summer, Tesla bulls on social media had taken the time to dox Montana Skeptic as Lawrence Fossi, a graduate of Yale Law School with 30 years of experience as a commercial trial attorney. Fossi was managing a $1 billion portfolio for a family office at the time his boss was alerted by Musk, personally, to his endeavors writing critically.

Fossi had written a multitude of articles on Seeking Alpha covering the Tesla story from a bearish standpoint. Naturally, he had disclosed numerous times that he is short Tesla by owning long-term puts in the name. Up until mid-2018, Montana Skeptic had been one of the most vocal critics of Tesla and Elon Musk. 

Fossi (Photo: Hidden Forces)

But Musk’s phone call to Fossi’s boss seemingly put his job at risk and, for the time being, it seemed like Musk had won the battle between the two. Montana Skeptic stopped writing on Seeking Alpha, took down his Twitter account and went underground, but for the occasional podcast appearance

Until now. 

“Back soon at Seeking Alpha,” Skeptic announced from a confirmed new Twitter account on December 7. 

This tweet was followed by a series of continued critical Tweets about Tesla as the new Twitter account quickly went from zero followers to nearly 4,000 followers in less than a week.

Days later, Skeptic’s newest piece, “Tesla: Nothing Matters, Until Everything Matters“, appeared on Seeking Alpha.

Skeptic’s Seeking Alpha bio now states: “I have recently retired and am free to write about whatever I want. And so I will.”

“I’m my own boss now, Elon, so you can phone me directly next time,” his new Twitter profile says. 

Welcome back, Skeptic. 


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 15:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/34m0wxo Tyler Durden

Kunstler Exposes “The Sickness Of Mind” That Has Infected America’s Thinking Class

Kunstler Exposes “The Sickness Of Mind” That Has Infected America’s Thinking Class

Authored by James Howard Kunstler via Kunstler.com,

Two for One Holiday Special

Hillary Clinton sure got her money’s worth with the Fusion GPS deal: it induced a three-year psychotic break in the body politic, destroyed the legitimacy of federal law enforcement, turned a once-proud, free, and rational press into an infernal engine of bad faith, and is finally leading her Democratic Party to an ignominious suicide. And the damage is far from complete. It’s even possible that Mrs. Clinton will return to personally escort the party over the cliff when, as is rumored lately, she jumps into the primary contest and snatches the gonfalon of leadership from the ailing old man of the sclerotic status quo, Uncle Joe Biden.

The citizens of this foundering polity have been subjected to a stunning doubleheader of political spectacle clear through the week.

On Monday, the Horowitz Report was briefly celebrated by the Left for claiming “no bias” and a “reasonable predicate” for the RussiaGate mess – until auditors actually got to read the 400-plus-page document and discovered that it was absolutely stuffed with incriminating details that Mr. Horowitz was too polite, too coy, or too faint-hearted to identify as acts worthy of referral for prosecution.

Mr. Barr, the attorney general, and US attorney John Durham immediately stepped up to set the record straight, namely, that this was hardly the end of the matter and that they were privy to fact-trains of evidence that would lead, by-and-by, to a quite different conclusion. This reality-test was greeted, of course, with shrieking for their dismissal from the Jacobin Left. But then at mid-week, Mr. Horowitz put in a personal appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee and left no doubt that entire RussiaGate extravaganza was spawned by Fusion GPS’s utterly false Steele dossier and the so-called “Intel Community’s” zeal for weaponizing it to overthrow the president.

The shock-waves from all that still pulsate through the disordered collective consciousness of this sore-beset republic, and will disturb the sleep of many former and current officials for months to come as the specter of Barr & Durham transmutes into a nightmare of Hammer & Tongs, perp-walks, and actual prosecutions. The utter falsity of the Steele dossier seems not to have yet penetrated the minds of Dean Baquet and Martin Baron, editors of The New York Times and The Washington Post, the head cheerleaders for the seditious coup by the security state. Their obdurate mendacity can no longer be attributed to a simple quest for clicks and eyeballs. It speaks to a sickness of mind that has infected the whole thinking class of America as it succumbed to the ultimate smashing of boundaries: the one between what is real and what is not real (or what is true and what is not true.)

All the week long, the Horowitz Report and its aftershocks were attended by the impeachment show in Jerrold Nadler’s House Judiciary Committee — an exercise so devoid of sense and prudence that it would embarrass all the kangaroos ever assembled in the courts of legend. As I write early Friday morning, Mr. Nadler’s majority is preparing to report out two dubious articles of impeachment: “abuse of power” and “contempt of congress.” As is always the case with the Resistance, Mr. Nadler’s posse is projecting on its enemy the very offenses it commits. One senses that the voters are seeing through this feeble hocus-pocus, and that even members of the greater Democratic caucus in the house may be getting the heebie-jeebies about staking their political futures on a vote for this idiocy.

A trial in the senate would be a ripe entertainment fer sure! Bring it on!

For one thing the procedure would ascertain finally that Mr. Eric Ciaramella does not qualify as a “whistleblower” but is rather a rogue CIA agent (from a rogue agency) helping to carry out a seditious conspiracy. The defense should call him to the stand, along with his enabler Michael Atkinson, the “Intel Community” Inspector General who flouted and altered the rules in the whistleblower ploy — and who, by the way, was formerly at the center of the RussiaGate mess when he worked as chief counsel to then assistant attorney general John P. Carlin, one of the instigators of the “Crossfire Hurricane” overture to RussiaGate. It could benefit the nation to hear testimony from shrinking violet Gina Haspel, the current CIA Director nobody has ever heard of. What does she know about Mr. Ciaramella’s role in this melodrama, who detailed him to the National Security Council, who supervised him, and who exactly were his associates?

And, of course, not a few fair-minded people would be interested to hear from Rep. Adam Schiff, who engineered the “whistleblower’s” entry into his concocted UkraineGate sequel to the now discredited RussiaGate ruse. Get Mr. Schiff under oath. He is almost certain to lie about his activities, and that will certainly get him expelled from congress in disgrace, along with losing his license to practice law. Bring in Hunter Biden and ask him to explain whether he was busted for crack cocaine in a rent-a-car before-or-after he was hired to serve on the board of directors of a Ukrainian gas company. Bring in Lt. Col. Vindman, bring in Daniel Goldman, bring them all in and compel their testimony under penalty of perjury. This will eventually get America right in its weakened mind.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 14:55

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2EhuTui Tyler Durden

Goldman Is Displeased: “The Tariff Reduction Is Only Half What We Expected”

Goldman Is Displeased: “The Tariff Reduction Is Only Half What We Expected”

While a close read of the “Phase One” deal reveals that, when stripped of all the cheerleading, it is largely hollow with China making an impossible promise to quadruple its ag imports from the US, something it will never do, in exchange for the US not implementing Dec 15 tariffs and cutting in half the rate on the latest round of tariffs, something Trump was hoping to do to avoid a market crash, even those institutions that used its widely anticipated passage as grounds for a rebound in optimism can’t help but be critical of what the USTR announced earlier today.

Case in point: Goldman Sachs, which has for weeks predicted that the upcoming trade war truce would be critical for the company’s bullish bias on the 2020 economy, couldn’t help itself in pointing out that the tariff rollback announced today falls short of our baseline expectation.”

This means that net of the 50% tariff cut in the Sept 2019 tariffs, the overall decline in Chinese tariffs is effectively negligible and represents just a 10% reduction in all Section 301 duties on Chinese goods. Here Goldman had assumed that the agreement would eliminate tariffs on List 4A entirely, which would have represented a roughly 20% reduction in Section 301 tariffs.

In other words, for all the excitement, all the US has done is lower its blended tariffs on China by a token 10%, which will have no impact on any production, capex or supply chain substitution plans.

Goldman’s full report is below:

BOTTOM LINE: Officials from the US and China have made formal statements indicating that a deal has been reached. There is still some uncertainty regarding details, but the most important development is that the White House has agreed to reduce September 1 tariffs (List 4A) on roughly $120bn in imports from China from 15% to 7.5%. While this signals a clear shift in the direction of US-China trade policy—i.e., tariffs are falling, not rising—the reduction is only half as large as our baseline assumption. We note that there is still some uncertainty regarding the status of this agreement, as it appears once again that some technical and legal details are still in flux.

MAIN POINTS:

  1. Officials from the US and China have made formal statements indicating that they have reached agreement on a “Phase One” trade deal that, according to the US Trade Representative (USTR) addresses “intellectual property, technology transfer, agriculture, financial services, and currency and foreign exchange” and “includes a commitment by China that it will make substantial additional purchases of U.S. goods and services in the coming years.” Neither US nor Chinese officials have been specific about what the reforms are, nor has there been any detail provided regarding the size of Chinese agriculture purchases from the US.
  2. The agreement includes a tariff rollback, as expected, but it falls short of our baseline expectation. Out of the slightly more than $500bn in goods the US imports from China, roughly $370bn are currently subject to tariffs, including roughly $120bn in goods that face 15% tariffs as of Sep. 1, known as “List 4A”. According to USTR, tariffs on List 4A will be reduced from 15% to 7.5%. This would represent a roughly 10% reduction in Section 301 duties on Chinese goods. We had assumed that the agreement would eliminate tariffs on List 4A entirely, which would have represented a roughly 20% reduction in Section 301 tariffs.
  3. While the smaller tariff rollback is slightly negative relative to our expectations, we note that the most important aspect of the agreement—assuming it is finalized—is that US tariffs are now set to decrease, marking a sharp turn from the US stance over the last two years. We estimate that, compared to our baseline assumption that the White House would remove tariffs on List 4A entirely, the impact of trade policy on Q4/Q4 US growth by the end of 2020 should be 0.07pp more negative than what had previously assumed, and that the impact on core PCE inflation should be 0.03pp higher. That said, these are relatively small numbers and the tariff reduction is still a net positive compared to the status quo.
  4. Our Asia Economics team believes that the incremental effect of this deal on the Chinese economy is also relatively small, as it is close to our baseline expectation of no additional tariffs and a roll back of the tariffs on List 4A. As a result, we do not expect the policy stance stated at the Central Economic Working Conference to be changed by this phase 1 deal.
  5. The lack of detail and statements that the agreement still needs to undergo “legal review” suggests that there is still some uncertainty regarding the specifics. That said, the fact that officials from both countries have made announced a deal along the same lines indicates, in our view, that the odds that the two sides fail to finalize the deal are low.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 14:44

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ssS1mQ Tyler Durden

“Back Up The Truck And Buy, Buy, Buy:” Why One Economist Thinks “There Is No Risk” Any More

“Back Up The Truck And Buy, Buy, Buy:” Why One Economist Thinks “There Is No Risk” Any More

If markets crash deep into the red, blame this guy.

With UK markets celebrating the Tories’ sweeping majority in Thursday’s vote, Chris Rupkey, the chief economist at MUFG Union Bank, sent his clients an eye-catching note. According to MarketWatch, it was entitled: “Buy it. Buy it all.”

Riding high on yesterday’s rally, and with global markets looking up early on Friday thanks to reports that Trump and China were finally ready to sign the ‘Phase One’ trade deal, Rupkey argued that markets would be celebrating a successful, managed Brexit and trade truce for the foreseeable future, and that traders faced “no risk” in growing their positions.

“Back up the truck and buy, buy, buy” Rupkey wrote, doing his best Cramer/Gartman impression.

Before this, Rupkey was best known to us for delivering a moving critique of the Fed’s decision to move ahead with interest-rate cuts earlier this year. But in this note, it appears Rupkey is throwing in the towel on this skepticism.

Already, the market has spoken. The public has zero faith that today’s events will resolve the “growth strangling” trade dispute. If anything, the deal likely won’t be resolved in a “big, big way” until after the next election.

Right now, after breaking through all-time high after all-time high on the back of trade optimism, is the time to go all-in and “throw caution to the wind,” Rupkey said.

“There is some smoke and mirrors here, but it looks like this is the time for investors around the world to throw months of caution to the winds and take risk off the table, and they are, buying stocks and selling bonds with abandon, as the economic outlook brightens and central banks shelve their plans to cut interest rates further,” he writes.

This, of course, would mean that none of the trade deal has been priced into the market yet. After months of pumping by the Trump administration, we find this hard to believe.

There’s no more risk? Sure, many seem to be backing away from their most dire predictions for 2020. But there’s still global economic data showing a manufacturing recession, and a Federal Reserve that’s already chafing traders by warning that it will likely stay ‘on hold’ next year (i.e. no more rate cuts), and plenty of signs of a market top.

If you’re piling into stocks right now, you probably have an outlook on 2020 that “looks better than it has in months,” Rupkey said, adding that he think the global economy will surprise investors next year.

“Take risk off the table as a concern to be hedged. There is no risk,” he writes. “Bet on it.” 

‘There is no risk?’ – we’d happily take the other side of that bet.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 14:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/36ytDPy Tyler Durden

Left-Wing Newspaper Advises People “How To Leave The United Kingdom” After Election Loss

Left-Wing Newspaper Advises People “How To Leave The United Kingdom” After Election Loss

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

Left-wing newspaper the Independent published an article advising people panicked about last night’s election result on how to leave the UK.

Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party swept to victory over Labour, who ran on a hard-left manifesto under their leader Jeremy Corbyn and had their worst result since 1935.

Shortly after the results of an exit poll were made public showing the Conservatives would win with a large majority, some leftists on Twitter began threatening to leave the country.

The Independent article also asserted that “some people of colour were considering leaving the UK if the Tories retained power as a result of the PM’s history of racist comments.”

“Other than packing possessions, kissing loved ones goodbye and boarding international transport, how do you actually leave the country?” asks the piece, before giving advice on how people need to settle their tax affairs before they move abroad.

As is virtually always the case after elections in both the UK and the US, threats to leave the country, often made by celebrities, are merely a form of virtue-signaling and never actually come to fruition.

*  *  *

My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 14:10

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RL7dql Tyler Durden

Trump Weighing 100% Tariffs On EU Products Including Irish Whiskey, Cognac, Spanish Olive Oil And French Cheese

Trump Weighing 100% Tariffs On EU Products Including Irish Whiskey, Cognac, Spanish Olive Oil And French Cheese

The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) has published a new list of additional European products that it’s reviewing in the Section 301 investigation involving the enforcement of US WTO rights. 

The notice contains a list of products, initially published in April 2019 and July 2019. The extended list is weighing the idea that 100% tariffs could be seen on products from almost every country in Europe. Some of these products include whiskeys, virgin olive oil, yogurt, cheese, knives, tools, liqueurs, and dozens of other products. 

The list published earlier this year is worth more than $10 billion. The USTR is hoping to weaponize tariffs to force Europe to cut subsidies to its manufacturing base. 

Bernstein analyst Trevor Stirling, quoted by CNBC, said the list of potentially tariffed European goods “once again includes blended whiskeys and Cognac … The fact that they had been excluded from the ‘final’ October list was a dodged bullet for Spirits companies back then. But now the threat is back.” 

“This is a full reshuffle – we are potentially seeing a rolling tariff, which we highlighted as a possibility two months ago,” Stirling added.

The USTR’s weaponization of tariffs are in direct response to pressure Europe to cut subsidies to Airbus as it alleges these unfair practices hurt Boeing. 

Also, consider how Boeing is in a crisis and the groundings of the 737 Max have boosted production and sales of the Airbus A320neo, which by late 2019, has outpaced Boeing in orders. Just this development alone has angered the Trump administration. 

USTR’s office said in a Dec. 2 statement: “As a result of the EU’s failure to address these subsidies, on October 18, the United States imposed tariffs of 10% on large civil aircraft and 25% on agricultural and other products.”

USTR added that “the United States is initiating a process to assess increasing the tariff rates and subjecting additional EU products to the tariffs,” because Europe has failed to decrease subsidies to its manufacturers. 

It seems that President Trump’s confidence as a protectionist has soared since reaching a phase one trade deal with China on Friday, that his administration is now ready to intensify a trade war with Europe. 

 


Tyler Durden

Fri, 12/13/2019 – 13:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/36vbG4s Tyler Durden