If the Fed thought its life was complicated before, when it was expected to cut rates even as the US economy was firing on all cylinders and humming along, Powell’s problems just hit nightmare level, following a Q2 GDP print that not only came in far stronger than expected, printing at 2.1%, far above the 1.8% consensus expectation…
…but Personal Consumption of 4.3% soared at the highest rate in five years, going back all the way to 2014.
And just in case that wasn’t enough, government spending boosted the bottomline Q2 GDP by 0.85%, the biggest contribution to GDP since 2009 as it climbed by a whopping 5%.
But if personal and government spending was the good news, trade was not, as exports subtracted 0.63% from the bottom line, the biggest drop since Q1 2009!
Developing.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2LIcCMp Tyler Durden
It’s rather extraordinary that so many people are still debating the various scenarios of the impact that U.S. GDP will have on which policy choice the FOMC is likely to make next week. Barring a shocking and unforeseeable result, it’s not supposed to come down to such a fine line. But a lot of that has to do with the fact that the market knows the Fed will do something, but is not really sure why. Which makes some of the outlier calls more game theory than economics.
It is often, and correctly, stated as fact that the Fed is central banker to the world. And, under current political circumstances, that’s more true than ever. Its fellow institutions are waiting for Fed Chairman Jerome Powell to give them the ability, cover and permission to move ahead with their own plans. And that will be forthcoming.
Obviously, the ECB statement and subsequent press conference has gotten the lion’s share of attention this week. But, in retrospect, the remarks given the day before by a senior economic adviser to Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe read as if he was reflecting the debates of central bankers around the world. And it may explain some of the differences of opinion within the ECB Governing Council that became evident over the course of yesterday’s meeting aftermath.
“If the Fed eases, then the Bank of Japan will need to think about further easing to prevent the yen strengthening.”
Take out the word “yen” and it would be anyone’s guess which country was being referred to. Don’t think of this as currency war talk. It isn’t aggression, or something nefarious. Its common sense and an issue of economic survival.
There isn’t a single proposal that the ECB has tasked their committees to study prior to the September meeting that would do more to help revitalize the European economy, specifically the manufacturing sector, than getting the euro lower. Period.
“Everyone must recognize” that negative interest rates hasn’t worked well, Abe’s adviser also said.
Too true that. The ECB can’t admit to that fact. A suitable explanation has to be found for policy errors. Even ones spawned by desperation. And doubling down is a sign of outright panic.
There’s a good reason certain Council members oppose tiering. It’s seen as a gateway to cutting away. You won’t hear the word “tiering” without someone responding, “reversal rate.” Nevertheless, an ECB rate cut is in the cards. Just be cautious of expecting the shock and awe of something bigger than the 10 basis points generally assumed and priced.
He doesn’t agree that the BOJ is running out of JGBs it can buy. There’s always more to be had. And the ECB, for its part, will change its rules as deemed necessary. Periphery spreads haven’t known what to make of the delay. That’s positioning, and maybe a little politically related prudence. And they certainly have room to correct. But the last thing the ECB is interested in is anything that looks like a lasting reversal. More QE will be the order of the day. Balance sheets will stay huge. Maybe forever.
Changes in priced-in policy…
Buying foreign bonds is attractive, but politically difficult. No argument with that. It feels like those that do it have been grandfathered in or are too small to matter. I’d be shocked if the ECB went down this path.
And the most important one of all: Fiscal measures will be needed should the economy weaken. Global headwinds are blowing from all parts of the globe. But it is hard to garner sufficient sympathy for Europe when the German finance minister felt compelled to preempt the ECB meeting by reiterating the lack of plans to do something meaningful about it.
Equities are bid. There are tons of support levels. Pick one that suits your risk tolerance and trade location and then don’t look at them. Resistance, as always, is the all-time high and your level of incredulity.
For the 10-year Treasury, day-traders will be leaning on Thursday’s range. The two-year gets interesting only outside of 1.90% and 1.80%. Through the higher level and it’s a tell that sentiment may be shifting.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ybOAkg Tyler Durden
Three months ago, if we were to guess which American company would become Beijing’s punching bag in retaliation for Washington’s treatment of Huawei, FedEx wouldn’t be near the top of our list. The No. 1 guess would, of course, be Apple and its suppliers, which rely on dozens of factories in China.
But with Apple already looking to “diversify” its supply chain away from China because of the trade war (and, just as importantly, rising labor costs), FedEx has emerged as the top target of the regime’s ire, and not without good reason. An investigation by the Chinese government has reportedly discovered more than 100 instances where the delivery and logistics service broke Chinese laws by not successfully delivering packages addressed to Huawei, FT reports.
Over the last couple of months, FedEx has admitted to “accidentally” diverting packages addressed to Huawei to locations in the US, though the company swiftly apologized and returned the packages in each instance, suspicions that FedEx was trying to help the US government spy on Huawei would be difficult to ignore.
Beijing’s probe has also reportedly uncovered ‘other violations’ of Chinese law by FedEx, but it didn’t specify what these violations might be, according to the FT. All of this suggests that if Beijing does launch a list of “unreliable entities” – a mirror of the Commerce Department’s ‘entities list’, where Huawei was blacklisted – FedEx will be the first name on it.
The company has maintained that its failure to properly deliver the packages was due to ‘operational error’, though Xinhua reported that the investigation had determined that this was “not in line with the facts.” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said during a press conference Friday morning that the ‘operational error’ excuse wasn’t believable.
FedEx declined to comment for Xinhua, but the harassment of FedEx seems to be thematically consistent with Beijing’s retaliation against Ottawa for the arrest of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. In retaliation, Chinese authorities arrested two Canadians, a former diplomat and a businessman, and have charged them with stealing state secrets, a charge that could carry a stiff sentence.
We hope any FedEx executives working in China have taken note: If they haven’t already, now might be a great time to get out of Dodge.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2OkzgNe Tyler Durden
Global markets were set to end the week mostly in a sea of green, reversing yesterday’s losses, with S&P futures pointing to a higher open as investors greeted the latest batch of corporate earnings, while ignoring Amazon’s downcast outlook and bracing for next week’s Federal Reserve meeting. In the “buy everything” euphoria, the dollar also climbed as did US Treasuries.
S&P Emini futures rose 0.3%, pointing to a turnaround after Wall Street shares fell from record highs on Thursday. Corporate results were mixed as Amazon missed estimates, its profits unexpectedly dropped and the company guided to a weaker than expected operating income, pushing its stock lower, while Google Alphabet rallied after exceeding revenue estimates.
Separately, decent earnings from Intel and Starbucks helped offset worries from weaker Amazon numbers. While corporate results have largely propped up stocks this earnings season, investors continue to watch for any hints of a slowdown in companies’ bottom lines. As a reminder, corporate earnings downgrades continue to sharply outpace upgrades.
“A stream of earnings from the United States has shown people have to pay attention to the corporate cycle as well as the interest rate cycle, and focus is also shifting to the U.S.’s latest GDP numbers this afternoon, which may go some way to influencing what the Federal Reserve decides to do,” said Andrew Milligan, head of global strategy at Aberdeen Standard Investments.
A day after its worst session in three weeks, the European Stoxx 600 index added 0.4%, led by media and telecom shares after positive earnings. Nestle’s higher revenue forecast also lifted the food sector. Among laggards, the retail sector was dragged by disappointing results from luxury giant Kering, while miners slid on metals weakness and after Anglo American’s largest shareholder liquidated its stake. London’s FTSE 100 also revived, helped by Vodafone’s plans to create a separate European tower company and education firm Pearson’s gains from an upbeat trading update.
Meanwhile, it was another bad day for European banks, with the Stoxx 600 Bank Index falling as much as 0.7% as earnings from Spanish banks disappointed. CaixaBank and Sabadell were the worst performers on the gauge, both falling more than 6% after their income from lending missed analysts’ expectations and both banks cut the outlook for core lending. Bankia, which reports on Monday, fell 4.5% and Bankinter also dropped 2.7%.
ECB President Mario Draghi on Thursday all but pledged to ease policy further and even hinted at a reinterpretation of the ECB’s inflation target. But many investors had hoped for an immediate reduction of interest rates.
“After the ECB yesterday opened the door to a looser monetary policy, the Fed is likely to cut interest rates next week,” Joerg Kraemer, chief economist at Commerzbank AG, wrote in a note. “The turnaround in global monetary policy is cementing the low interest rate environment on bond markets.”
Earlier in the session, Asian stocks retreated, led by technology and consumer staples firms, as uncertainties over whether Washington and Beijing will be able to settle gaping differences over trade, technology and even geopolitical ambitions, kept many investors on guard. Negotiators from the two countries will meet in Shanghai next week. MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan dropped 0.6, with Indonesia and Singapore leading declines. The Topix fell 0.4%, driven by Keyence Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp. Nissan Motor dropped 3.2% after announcing its plan to cut 12,500 jobs and reduce production capacity amid a global slump in car demand. The Shanghai Composite Index reversed earlier losses and closed 0.2% higher, bringing its weekly gain to 0.7%. China is allowing several domestic companies to buy U.S. cotton, corn, sorghum and pork free of retaliatory tariffs. India’s Sensex rose 0.2%, with Bajaj Finance Ltd. and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. among the biggest boosts, as investors weighed earnings against bad-debt risk. Most Nifty companies that have reported earnings this season have either met or beat estimates
A rally in global bonds ran out of steam after Draghi cautioned about pulling the trigger too quickly on policy easing. Euro zone government bond yields began to reverse some of the rises seen after the ECB meeting. German 10-year bond yields were around one basis points lower at -0.373%, heading back down towards the record low of -0.422%, recorded on Thursday. Other 10-year yields in the euro zone were also around two basis points lower
In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose for a second day, headed for its biggest gain since July 5 as traders trimmed bets on the size of expected Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts and helped by a whisper number for U.S. GDP data that was better than economists’ median forecast. The euro traded at $1.1136, a mild recovery from a two-month low of $1.1102 hit after the ECB decision on Thursday but down 0.1% on the day. For the week, the single currency is down 0.7%. Sterling edged down to $1.2428, and was on course for a 0.6% weekly loss. Cable has stabilised since Boris Johnson became Britain’s new prime minister, but uncertainty remains about Britain’s negotiations to leave the European Union.
In geopolitics, North Korea confirmed it tested a new type of short-range ballistic missile yesterday and its leader Kim stated South Korea has been bringing in weapons for attack, while he added that North Korea must keep developing weapons to eliminate national security threats and that the missile firing was a warning to South Korea’s warmongers. Additionally, officials confirmed Iran tested a medium-range ballistic missile yesterday.
Traders will also be scrutinizing today’s GDP figures, which will probably show growth cooled in the second quarter to 1.8% from the 3.1% annualized pace set in the prior period. Central banks remain at the top of the agenda, with policy makers expected to boost stimulus at next week’s Fed meeting.
Macro economic data to watch include second-quarter GDP and personal consumption figures. Aon, Twitter, AbbVie, McDonald’s, Colgate-Palmolive are among companies reporting earnings.
Market Snapshot
S&P 500 futures up 0.3% to 3,015.00
STOXX Europe 600 up 0.2% to 390.18
MXAP down 0.6% to 160.03
MXAPJ down 0.7% to 526.29
Nikkei down 0.5% to 21,658.15
Topix down 0.4% to 1,571.52
Hang Seng Index down 0.7% to 28,397.74
Shanghai Composite up 0.2% to 2,944.54
Sensex up 0.05% to 37,849.14
Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.4% to 6,793.39
Kospi down 0.4% to 2,066.26
German 10Y yield fell 0.5 bps to -0.368%
Euro down 0.1% to $1.1136
Brent Futures up 0.1% to $63.47/bbl
Italian 10Y yield rose 2.3 bps to 1.166%
Spanish 10Y yield fell 0.8 bps to 0.349%
Gold spot up 0.2% to $1,418.03
U.S. Dollar Index up 0.08% to 97.89
Top Overnight News from Bloomberg
Negative interest rates from central banks come with costs. They’re blamed for squeezing banks, punishing savers, keeping dying companies on life support, and fueling a potentially unsustainable surge in asset prices. This isn’t lost on policymakers at the ECB, who pushed a key rate below zero in 2014. But consider their position: Making money cheaper is the main tool they have to boost stubbornly slow growth. And they aren’t getting a lot of help from governments.
The enormity of the challenge facing Boris Johnson to break Britain’s political deadlock was laid bare in his first days as prime minister, as the EU rejected his demands for a better Brexit deal
When Christine Lagarde chairs her first meeting as European Central Bank president in November, she might wonder which of her colleagues don’t really want her there.
Iran earlier this week test fired a medium-range ballistic missile that traveled 1,000 kilometers, CNN reported citing an unnamed U.S. official,move escalating tensions around one of the world’s most important shipping corridors
U.S. House passed a two-year debt ceiling extension and budget bill Thursday in a bipartisan deal backed by President Trump that will lessen the chance of a shutdown this fall
Some Bank of Japan officials see little to be gained from strengthening its interest-rate pledge next week, according to people familiar
Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said he would be willing to travel to Tehran to address the Iranian people about U.S. foreign policy as the Trump administration applies maximum pressure to renegotiate a nuclear accord
Mario Draghi is shouting louder than ever for help with the euro-area economy, and still no one is listening.
As more Chinese companies stumble on their debt, one fund manager is turning wary of riskier bonds from the nation, in another sign that the asset class’s strong performance this year may be nearing an end.
Asian equity markets traded negatively as the region conformed to the downbeat global risk tone post-ECB, while disappointing earnings also added to the glum. ASX 200 (-0.4%) and Nikkei 225 (-0.5%) were lower with tech and financials leading the declines in Australia, while sentiment in Tokyo was dampened by disappointing results including Nissan. Elsewhere, Hang Seng (-0.7%) and Shanghai Comp. (+0.2%) were subdued after further PBoC inaction resulted to a net weekly liquidity drain of CNY 410bln with underperformance in Hong Kong after poor trade data for June in which Exports slipped 9.0% Y/Y and as protesters planned to take their rally to the Hong Kong International Airport. Finally, 10yr JGBs were subdued as they mirrored the lacklustre tone in USTs and European counterparts after a less dovish than hoped ECB, although downside was also stemmed amid weakness in stocks and the BoJ’s presence in the market today.
Top Asian News
Some at BOJ Are Said to Doubt Effectiveness of Stronger Guidance
Singapore Home Prices on the Rise Again One Year After Curbs
Tokyo Electron 1Q Profit Beats Estimate Despite Capex Adjustment
Singapore Opposition Says ‘Fake News’ Law May Be Used as Muzzle
European stocks are relatively directionless amid another earnings-driven morning for the region [Eurostoxx 50 +0.4%] following on from a mostly negatively Asia-Pac handover post-ECB. Sectors are mixed with clear outperformance seen in telecom names as the sector is bolstered by FTSE-giant Vodafone (+9.5%) after the Co. announced a potential IPO of its Towerco unit alongside its numbers. On the flipside, material names lag, heavily weighted on by Anglo American (-5.0%) after metals tycoon Agarwal sold his stake in the mining name. Elsewhere, gains in the consumer discretionary sector is capped by Kering (-6.2%) after the fashion name open lower in excess of 9% amid disappointing Gucci sales. Meanwhile, optimistic numbers from Intel (+4.8% pre-market) buoyed the European chip names ASM (+3.8%) and STMicroelectonics (+2.6%) and Infineon (+0.8%). Finally, Bayer (+1.4%) shares have received further reprieve after a US judge lowered the verdict against the Co. in the Roundup case to USD 86.7mln from USD 2.2bln. State-side, after-hours yesterday, Amazon (-1.5% pre-market) earnings missed on top and bottom line, whilst Alphabet (+8.5% pre-market) beat on both top and bottom line and advertising revenues topped expectations.
Top European News
Pearson Jumps After Raising Earnings Outlook in Digital Push
Money Managers Turn to Turkish Exporters After Surge in Banks
Europcar Drops to Record Low as Analysts Cite 2Q Report Weakness
Three Charts For Those Who Aren’t Worried About German Growth
In FX, the Antipodean Dollars are extending losses and underperformance on the back of increasingly dovish RBA and RBNZ policy outlooks, with expectations building for another 50 bp easing from both Central Banks on top of the rate cuts already administered in the current cycle. In contrast, consensus for the Fed has narrowed to ¼ point for starters and seems unlikely to change materially barring a major development between now and next week’s FOMC. Hence, Aud/Usd has slipped further below 0.6950 towards 0.6925 and July 10’s 0.6911 base beckons before 0.6900, while Nzd/Usd is looking vulnerable under 0.6650 given no real support ahead of 0.6600 and the mtd trough way down at 0.6568.
ZAR – The Rand continues to reel after its brief post-SARB rebound on the threat of a SA rating downgrade and bearish technical impulses following the break of 14.0000 against the Buck, with key Fib resistance also breached at 14.1360 on the way to 14.1780 and the next chart target looming just shy of 14.2000 in the form of the 200 DMA (14.1920).
DXY – Amidst broad Greenback gains vs G10 and other counterparts, the index has finally cleared a key technical hurdle of its own at 97.767 and is now nudging 98.000 ahead of US GDP data that could provide more impetus or hamper further advances.
JPY/GBP/EUR/CHF/CAD – All on the backfoot, as the Yen fails to glean any traction from mixed Japanese inflation data ahead of the BoJ meeting and meanders between 105.57-73 parameters, while Cable has topped out around 1.2520 yet again and saw stops tripped through trend-line support circa 1.2445 to 1.2425 low. Elsewhere, the single currency has drifted back down from post-ECB rebound highs not far from 1.1200, but holding above the minor new pre-Draghi presser 2019 low and the Franc remains off recent highs in 0.9900-20 and 1.050-38 respective bands vs the Dollar and Euro respectively, with perhaps some acknowledgement of a 25 bp SNB rate cut call from UBS. Similarly, the Loonie is softer within a 1.3157-83 range and prone to the aforementioned US data ahead of Canada’s May budget balance.
EM – Unlike the depreciating Zar, the Try is still unwinding initial post-CBRT losses as Turkish President Erdogan applauds the bold 425 bp move and concurs with the more cautious approach towards further easing between now and the end of the year. The Lira is holding ‘comfortably’ above 5.7000 vs the Buck and the Rouble seems almost as content or prepared for the CBR to cut rates again, with Usd/Rub around 63.1000 and at the lower end of 63.2500-0695 parameters.
In commodities, there was little to report on the energy front as WTI and Brent futures are relatively flat following the decline in the complex heading into yesterday’s settlement. The former currently hovers just above the 56/bbl ahead of its 50 and 200 DMAs at 56.73/bbl and 57.03/bbl respectively, whilst the latter resides around the 63.50/bbl mark. Looking at this week’s performance so far, both benchmarks are currently poised to post gains, albeit off highs. WTI and Brent kicked the week off around 55.70/bbl and 62.60/bbl and have reached highs of 57.62/bbl and 64.64/bbl respectively, bolstered by geopolitical woes. Next up, traders will be eyeing the US Q2 GDP release as the next potential catalyst, with headline expectations of 1.8% annualized growth (Prev. 3.1% in Q1) which would mark the lowest quarterly growth rate since early 2016. Elsewhere, gold is flat despite a firmer Buck as the yellow metal eyes the US tier 1 data release at 1330BST. The precious metal looks set to end the week on the backfoot (weekly range: 1411-33/oz) as the gains seen from rising geopolitical tensions earlier in the week was erased during the ECB press conference yesterday. Meanwhile, copper is lackluster and has dipped below the 2.70/lb amid the cautious risk tone and is currently at the bottom of the weekly 2.68-76/lb range thus far. Finally, Dalian iron ore prices climbed over 3% overnight with traders citing a rise in demand as smaller steel mills take advantage of the production curb on larger competitors amid pollution.
US Event Calendar
8:30am: Revisions: National Income and Accounts (GDP)
8:30am: GDP Annualized QoQ, est. 1.8%, prior 3.1%
8:30am: Personal Consumption, est. 4.0%, prior 0.9%
8:30am: GDP Price Index, est. 2.0%, prior 0.9%
8:30am: Core PCE QoQ, est. 2.0%, prior 1.2%
DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
For those of you reading across large parts of Europe I hope you haven’t melted in light of what for many has been both the hottest day and hottest night in history. Having been in an air-conditioned office all morning yesterday, stepping out at lunch was like nothing I’d experienced before apart from times where I have been in Singapore! Not only was it hot, it was incredibly humid. Very unlike London. It seems that the surprise cloud mid-afternoon left London a few decimal points away from its hottest day in history and instead we saw the second hottest day on record. The trains home were relatively chaotic last night as fears that the tracks would melt led to multiple cancellations and speed restrictions. There was also a dog on the track and an owner that decided to chase him across the line. This led to a major multi-hour shut down of the network and all power. This left those stranded on trains without air-con. If there’s one job I never want to have it’s the owner of the Twitter account of the help desk of my railway line operator. Never have I read so many angry tweets to them about cancellations, slow trains, dogs on the track, and a lack of aircon. After all the abuse, I think had it have been me I would have cracked and sent back a series of “stop (expletive) moaning” type responses. Remind me never to get into PR.
Mr Draghi has been the master at absorbing all the criticism markets have thrown at him over the years and then come out fighting. Indeed, given what happened yesterday its rather apt that seven years ago today, Mr Draghi made his seminal “whatever it takes” speech which was the main turning point in terms of reversing a then rolling European sovereign crisis. In terms of saving the Euro project, this speech was a great success. Indeed Italian yields which were trading above 6.5% when he stood up to speak are now 1.52%. However the subsequent policies associated with this speech have seen much collateral damage with negative policy rates, €2.6 trillion of QE, 50% of the €11.8 trillion European bond market now trading at a negative yield, mixed growth performance and with lower and lower expectations of inflation. Indeed, 5y5yr forward inflation swaps have fallen from 2.2% back on this day in 2012 to 1.13% before Sintra last month and 1.315% last night. The ECB have succeeded in keeping the Euro together to date, but have failed by a large margin on their inflation mandate.
One day ahead of this anniversary, Mr Draghi pulled out yet another bazooka from his arsenal with the aim of getting inflation higher. However, for markets it was a case of buy the story, sell the delivery as it became clear in the press conference that the written words in the statement were more powerful than the verbal message. Nevertheless yesterday’s meeting lays the groundwork for another big set of policy easing going forward. In more detail, perhaps the key change was strengthening the commitment to price stability by elevating the symmetry of the inflation target, saying that interest rates would be held “for as long as necessary to ensure the continued sustained convergence of inflation to its aim”, whereas previously that had been the convergence of inflation “to levels that are below, but close to, 2%”. Later in the statement, they also referred to the Governing Council’s “commitment to symmetry in the inflation aim” and reintroduced the phrase “or lower” to the rates guidance. The problem is whether monetary policy alone is enough to help. We’ll likely need fiscal policy to get consistent inflation around 2%.
As Mark Wall discussed in his review note, Draghi now has seven weeks to convince the Council to keep with him and deliver a strong enough easing package. Our team have slightly updated their baseline expectation for what the ECB will announce in the coming months. They continue to expect a 10bp deposit rate cut and tiering in September and a further 10bp cut in December. In light of both the breadth of the Policy Decision statement – a sign of Draghi’s powers of persuasion – and the worrying signals on the external side of the economy from the latest PMI and Ifo data and the ECB’s sensitivity to this, they are now including new net asset purchases in their baseline view for September. They expect EUR30bn per month for a minimum 9-12 months split evenly between public and private assets. This move to new QE is still a close call. If data and events surprise to the upside in the meantime, the ECB could stall on this element of the easing package. For more detail on the ECB and our economists’ thoughts see the piece here ( link ).
Markets were all over the place as they digested the ECB statement and press conference. Initially, risk assets rallied strongly, the euro weakened, and rates fell, but the moves completely reversed during the press conference. For example, the Stoxx was +0.86% higher after the statement but dipped to -1.04% lower after the presser ended. It eventually closed -0.56%. In terms of bunds, a -4.4bps rally immediately after the statement (and a fresh all-time low) led to a +8.8bps sell-off into the end of the Q&A before rallying back -2.9bps into the close to end the session +1.5bps higher. Other sovereign markets mirrored the erratic bund moves, with BTPs and OATs ending up +2.4bps and +0.8bps higher, after roundtrip moves of c.20bps and c.11bps, respectively. Swiss 10-year yields fell -1.8bps, and their ultra-long 2064 bond dipped to yield as low as -0.05%, taking the entire universe of Swiss government debt into negative territory. In equities, the Dax (-1.28%), CAC 40 (-0.50%) and the FTSE MIB (-0.80%) all closed lower.
A few of Draghi’s unscripted comments were noteworthy. He said that though there was “broad agreement” on the economic outlook, the council was not unanimous on other topics, thus admitting that there is some pushback against easing in September. He also declined, despite repeated questions, to comment on the size of future cuts, or the scale or composition of QE. Finally, he said that no one argued for immediate action and he did not mention a formal review of the inflation target. These were all hawkish compared to expectations, and drove the reversal in price action. Markets did react positively to Draghi’s attempts to raise inflation, with five-year forward five-year inflation swaps rising by 2.4 bps to a two-month high of 1.315%, although this was below the intra-day peak of 1.3598%. The euro hit its lowest intraday level against the dollar in over two years of 1.1102, before strengthening back to 1.1146 as it was also a victim of the intra-day swing. After European markets closed, anonymously-sourced articles circulated from Reuters and Bloomberg, saying that a September rate cut “appears certain” but that “some ECB policymakers still need to be convinced about tiering.”
In a further sign of the Eurozone slowdown and the perceived need to act, the Ifo business climate index from Germany fell to 95.7 in July (vs. 97.2 expected), the lowest reading since April 2013 and the fourth consecutive monthly decline. There wasn’t much consolation in the other readings either, with the current assessment falling to a 3-year low of 99.4 (vs. 100.4 expected) while the expectations reading fell to a ten-year low of 92.2 (vs. 94.0 expected). Echoing the PMIs from Wednesday, where the German manufacturing reading was at a seven-year low, the Ifo statement said that for manufacturing, “the business climate indicator is in freefall”.
As for US markets, they mostly took their cue from Europe, opening lower and unable to rebound throughout the session. The S&P 500 and DOW retreated -0.51% and -0.47%, with all sector groups retreating. The NASDAQ (-1.00%) and NYFANG (-2.46%) underperformed, with a notable selloff for Tesla (-13.61%) after poorly-received earnings Wednesday evening. The chemicals sector also lagged, shedding -0.75%, as Dow Inc. (-3.83%) reported below-average revenues with management saying that “buying patterns remain cautious due to ongoing trade and geopolitical uncertainties.” There were some positive results from Raytheon (+4.58%) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (+5.02%), who beat expectations and raised guidance.
After markets closed, Google (+7.93% afterhours) announced strong revenue growth of +21% yoy, beating even the most optimistic forecasts. That overnight gain is worth over $60bn in market cap. Intel (+5.10%) said that the second quarter was “much stronger than expected,” with revenues falling only 3% to $16.5bn, compared to expectations for a drop of around 8%. Both companies seem to be adjusting relatively smoothly to tariff-related disruptions. In contrast, Amazon (-1.66%) reported disappointing profit figures of $5.22 per share compared to consensus expectations for $5.57, which outweighed positive revenue growth of +20% yoy. In aggregate, these moves helped NASDAQ futures to gain +0.47% overnight.
Amidst the dovish emphasis from the ECB, the data from the US was more positive. Durable goods orders rose by 2.0% mom in June (vs. 0.7% expected), while the ex-transportation measure rose 1.2% mom (vs. 0.2% expected). Initial jobless claims fell to 206k last week (vs. 218k expected), which brings the 4-week average down to 213k, the lowest since April. Elsewhere, wholesale inventories rose by 0.2% mom in June, (vs. 0.5% expected), and the Kansas City Fed’s Manufacturing index fell to -1 (vs. 3 expected), the first negative reading since August 2016. The June trade deficit was also wider than expected at $74.2bn from a downwardly-revised -$75.0bn. Overall, the data pushed the Atlanta Fed’s estimate of second quarter GDP down -0.3pp to 1.3%, mostly as a function of a wider trade deficit and weaker inventories.
This morning in Asia markets are following Wall Street’s lead with the Nikkei (-0.46%), Hang Seng (-0.45%), Shanghai Comp (-0.16%) and Kospi (-0.54%) all lower. Elsewhere, futures on the S&P 500 are up +0.26%.
In other overnight news, ahead of next week’s BoJ monetary policy meeting ( on July 30th), Bloomberg has reported that some of the BoJ officials see little to be gained from strengthening the bank’s interest rate pledge while adding that the officials would accept a change if pressed at the meeting, but they are concerned that just bolstering the pledge would simply highlight the BOJ’s limited firepower or even backfire, especially with the Fed widely expected to cut US interest rates the following day. As a reminder, the BoJ had changed its guidance just three months back, pledging to keep its interest rates extremely low “at least through around spring 2020,” versus “an extended period of time” previously. Elsewhere, Xinhua reported that China has rejected FedEx claims that it rerouted some Huawei shipments to the US by mistake thereby raising the risks that the delivery giant will be blacklisted in the world’s second-largest economy. The report further added that FedEx’s previous statements are inconsistent with the facts and the company is suspected of holding up more than 100 inbound deliveries involving Huawei.
Staying with Asia, in a sign of escalating geopolitical risks, CNN reported (citing an unnamed US official), that Iran test-fired a medium-range ballistic missile earlier this week that traveled 1,000 kilometers. This is escalating tensions around one of the world’s most important shipping- and air-traffic corridors. Elsewhere, the US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said that the US still wants talks with North Korea despite launches of short-range missiles while adding that he hopes working-level talks between the two countries will begin in the next month or so. Meanwhile, North Korea said the missile launches were a warning to South Korean “warmongers,” while adding that the missile launches were intended to convey the Kim regime’s displeasure over approaching military exercises in South Korea.
Here in the UK, sterling was ended -0.26% weaker as new Prime Minister Boris Johnson made his first statement as PM to the House of Commons yesterday. In his remarks, Johnson rejected the existing Withdrawal Agreement, saying that it “has been three times rejected by this House. Its terms are unacceptable to this Parliament and to this country.” On the backstop, he said that “the way to the deal goes by way of the abolition of the backstop”, and said that a time-limit, which had been suggested by some as a compromise solution to the issue, was “not enough”. In terms of the EU’s response, the FT’s Alex Barker reported yesterday that the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, said that Johnson’s desire to eliminate the backstop “is of course unacceptable and not within the mandate of the European Council.” Meanwhile, the EC President Juncker told Boris Johnson over a phone conversation that the current WA is the best and only deal possible. In a note yesterday ( link here), DB’s Oliver Harvey increased the probability of a no-deal Brexit to 50% (from 45% previously), and Oliver writes that Johnson’s demands of an end to the backstop as opposed to modifications are “setting a near impossibly high bar for an agreement.” The political developments came as the CBI’s survey showed the retail sales balance at -16 (vs. -15 expected). Although the July reading was up from June’s -42, this was the third consecutive month with a negative reading, the first time that’s happened since 2011.
Meanwhile the political stalemate in Spain following the country’s inconclusive elections in April continued yesterday as Prime Minister Sanchez lost a vote in Parliament on forming a new government by 155-124, with 67 abstaining. The defeat came after negotiations between Sanchez’s Socialist Party and the left-wing Podemos failed to reach an agreement, and Podemos ended up abstaining in the investiture vote. With Sanchez’s Socialists only having a minority in parliament, he’ll need to find support elsewhere to form a government or the country will face fresh elections, having already had three over the last four years.
The Turkish lira paradoxically strengthened almost 1 percent against the dollar yesterday, following the central bank’s decision to cut the one-week repo rate by 425bps to 19.75%, bigger than the 250bp cut which the consensus expected. The currency ultimately retraced to close flat. In the central bank’s statement, they said that “recent forecast revisions suggest that inflation is likely to materialise slightly below the projections of the April Inflation Report by the end of the year.” The move comes after President Erdogan, who has called for more expansionary monetary policy, replaced the previous Governor earlier this month. Our CEEMEA team ( link here) say after today’s move that they think the one-week repo rate could fall to 15% by end-2019.
Looking at the day ahead, the data highlight will be the advance estimate of Q2 GDP from the US, including personal consumption and core PCE. Elsewhere, we have consumer confidence data from France and Italy for July, and French PPI for June. In terms of earnings releases today, the highlights include Twitter, Nestle and McDonald’s, while the Russian central bank will be deciding rates.
Oh… and it’s going to rain!!!!! I would say happy days but that might mean it doesn’t stop rather than just being a temporary chance for us all to cool down a bit.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2yfzLNK Tyler Durden
For a minute there, it looked like the investors who had helped finance Soft Bank’s original Vision Fund were finally beginning to question the strategy of paying exorbitant sums for stakes in Silicon Valley’s most popular unicorns. But, aside from a handful of embarrassing flops, the strategy appears to have paid off: Because even though Soft Bank’s original patrons, the Saudis and Emiratis, have expressed their reservations, it appears the Japanese telecoms-giant-with-a-VC-arm has succeeded in raising its second venture fund in less than three years.
According to WSJ and the FT, despite the Uber IPO’s embarrassing flop, Soft Bank (the largest single backer of Uber; it is reportedly holding on to its shares) has locked down commitments for $108 billion from Microsoft, Apple, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, the sovereign wealth fund of Kazakhstan and an array of other investors – though the Saudis and Emiratis have balked, they’re reportedly still in talks with Soft Bank about a possible commitment.
Several Japanese and Taiwanese banks and insurers have also reportedly committed capital.
At $108 billion, the fund is the largest private pool of money ever assembled, and it couldn’t have come at a better time. The first Vision Fund has invested some $70 billion in more than 70 companies, but because of annual disbursements it must make to some investors, it has effectively run out of working capital.
Soft Bank Chairman Masayoshi Son said he wants the new fund to focus on AI, which the billionaire Soft Bank founder believes will explode in usefulness as the amount of real-world data gathered by sensors, cameras and other machines would allow companies to better leverage these connections. And because of an even larger investment from his company, it’s likely that Masayoshi Son will have even more control over investment decisions.
“The power to predict the future is about to emerge,” Mr. Son said last week at a Tokyo conference SoftBank held for its corporate clients. “The amount of data will grow by a million times over the next 30 years.”
That means the Vision Fund II will be a boon for any trendy AI startups, now that they know Masayoshi Son will pay an absurd premium for a 10% stake.
But like last time, Soft Bank is also committing a large chunk of its capital. The fund will commit $38 billion to this latest fund, up from $28 billion in the first Vision Fund. To make this work, the telecoms giant will need to liquidate some of its investments. For that to happen, it would help for the Sprint-T-Mobile merger to finally go through, but the opposition by the federal government and some state AGs has left its success very much in question.
The Vision Fund was credited with single-handedly raising valuations across the unicorn space by making $100 million the new minimum check size. Suddenly, Sequoia Capital and other major VC firms had to raise multi-billion-dollar investment funds just to compete and get stakes in valuable startups.
Now, with WeWork and Slack next up on the hot IPO docket, Vision Fund II has arrived to pump up the valuations of the next round of unicorn darlings. And remember: The faster they burn cash, the larger the valuation multiple.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Mi0jpI Tyler Durden
The hundreds of thousands of protesters who rallied across Puerto Rico (and in Puerto Rican communities across the US) will love this: On her first day as the commonwealth’s governor-in-waiting, Secretary of Justice Wanda Vazquez has become the target of an investigation by the Office of Government Ethics, which announced a “review” of her conduct as the island’s top law-enforcement official.
Many of the Puerto Ricans who rallied against Ricardo Rossello, the island’s deeply unpopular governor, who resigned in disgrace earlier this week, would welcome this investigation. Vasquez has a reputation for being a corrupt official who will carry on Rossello’s policies, and marches had been planned to demand that she also resign, and that the island allow the people to select a new leader.
Wanda Vazquez
The job would have fallen to the territory’s secretary of state, but Luis Rivera Marín had resigned earlier this month over the texting scandal, and no replacement had yet been named. It’s unclear when, exactly, that might happen: Whether Rossello plans to appoint another secretary before leaving office is an open question, Bloomberg reports.
Zulma Rosario, executive director of the OGE, directed her staff Thursday to investigate accusations that Vazquez ignored evidence of corruption in disbursing the Hurricane Maria relief funds.
“What we’re investigating is her alleged denial or refusal to investigate these claims as secretary of justice,” Rosario said, adding that she didn’t know how long the investigation would take.
Thousands celebrated in the streets on Thursday when Rossello said that he would leave office on Aug. 2, finally caving after weeks of massive protests driven by a scandal: hundreds of pages of text messages between Rossello and members of his inner circle that included rude and offensive remarks and homophobic slurs.
The texts were the last straw for many Puerto Ricans, as the island has struggled under a string of corrupt, unpopular governors who helped drive it into bankruptcy.
But because of her links to Rossello, Vazquez isn’t what they had in mind for a replacement.
Vazquez has already survived one ethics investigation. Back in 2018, she was probed over whether she improperly intervened in a case involving a robbery at her daughter and son-in-law’s home. She temporarily stepped down because of the investigation, but was reinstated after it concluded that she had done nothing wrong.
Whether Vazquez makes it a year remains to be seen. On Thursday, BBG reported that graffiti artists were spray painting messages around San Juan: ‘Vazquez, we are coming for you next’.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Gt9u32 Tyler Durden
Yesterday’s vote in the British Conservative Party confirmed that Boris Johnson will become the United Kingdom’s next prime minister.
Johnson beat his opponent, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Jeremy Hunt, by a margin of 92,153 to 46,656 among Conservative voters. Prime Minister Theresa May had stepped down after her efforts to reach a deal with the European Union regarding the UK’s exit from the bloc were repeatedly rejected in the House of Commons. May had negotiated several extensions to the official exit, which is now set for October 31. That leaves Johnson with little time to find an agreement.
The Conservative Party is currently a minority government, relying on the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) to get measures passed. Since the prime minister post is not directly elected, the ruling political party’s leader automatically becomes head of government. The next general election isn’t scheduled until May 2022.
Boris Johnson is a household name in British politics. He’s the former Brussels correspondent for the Daily Telegraph, former mayor of London, and was one of the most vocal voices behind the campaign to leave the European Union in the Brexit referendum campaign of 2016. The 55-year-old has a massive vocabulary, and is known for his colorful columns and even more colorful insults. In 2013, when he was mayor, he called the London assembly “great, supine, protoplasmic, invertebrate jellies,” getting a laugh even from those who had just voted to remove him from the assembly room.
Beyond his articulate wit, Johnson is likely to be more free market than his Conservative predecessors, though exactly where he stands ideologically is hard to tell. He doesn’t seem to follow in the footsteps of the Tories’ restrictive lifestyle police, as he opposes increased sugar taxes, which have been lauded as a necessary tool for public health. And even though Johnson supports tax cuts for the middle class and increasing the higher-rate income tax threshold by more than 60 percent, he wants to avoid deficits only by increasing borrowing.
Most important however, is what he’ll do differently than his predecessor, Theresa May, to secure Britain’s departure from the European Union. Johnson first opposed the Withdrawal Agreement that May’s government negotiated with the EU, only to “reluctantly” support it on the third vote. This cost him some trust among hardline pro-Brexit supporters. Famous Brexiteer Nigel Farage doubts that Johnson can get the exit done by October 31, though newly elected European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen says she would be open to another extension of the official exit date.
Johnson’s options are limited: either he convinces the EU to make fundamental changes to the Withdrawal Agreement—which seems unlikely—or he cancels triggering Article 50 and doesn’t leave the EU at all—which would be the end of his premiership—or he risks leaving the EU without a deal.In the past, he’s made it clear that he’s open to the third option. Under a no deal scenario, the UK and the EU would fall back onto World Trade Organization rules, which would reintroduce tariffs on goods coming from the EU. Westminster has insisted it would not do this, though Brussels has not been entirely clear on its position.
This is the point of contention: if the UK and the EU re-introduce tariffs, then long lines at the border (including in Northern Ireland) could interrupt the supply chain, and cause shortages and rising prices. On the other hand, Brexiteers have assured their critics that technological improvements can make the process smooth and unseemly, and that tariffs would only come into effect if the EU were to take that step. From a UK standpoint, no border would need to be erected.
The new PM has made it clear that he wants to get a deal, but also that he is ready to steer towards no deal if necessary. This is essentially a negotiating position: if you announce prior to a negotiation that you will never walk away (which is what Theresa May did), then you can be sure that the other side will exploit you.
For the EU, Boris is the least favorable option in this sense, because he seems most secure in walking away from the negotiating table. This explains the nervous reactions across Europe yesterday afternoon. EU Health Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis even insinuated on the official website of the European Commission that Johnson deceived the British electorate.
If Johnson does not reach a deal, if he kowtows to pressure and begs for an extension, then his days as PM will be short-lived.
If he leaves without a deal, he will be faced with doomsday scenarios for weeks, with every bit of bad economic news blamed on his leadership.
If he manages to strike a good deal for the United Kingdom, he will go down in history as one of the UK’s most effective leaders.
The suspense is palpable. We will find out what happens on October 31.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2GuPOMe Tyler Durden
The question of which countries are paying more in EU contributions than they are getting out is a contentious issue for some and was also one major factor in the Brexit vote in the UK.
In the 2017 budget, there were ten EU members contributing more than they got out of the EU, at least in terms of direct monetary contributions. As Statista’s Katharina Buchholz notes, UK came in second place in the ranking, with roughly 7.5 million euros of net contributions. Germany, topping the ranking, put in 12.8 billion euros more than it got out.
Poland was the biggest monetary benefactor from the EU, coming out with 8.2 billion euros earned, far ahead of Greece (3.7 billion euros) and Romania (3.4 billion euros).
But being on top of this list doesn’t have to send a country scrambling to leave the political union. In Germany, for example, support for the EU is high. While budget contributions might outweigh direct financial benefits for the country, a study by the Bertelsmann foundation suggests that the single EU market increased the average incomes of Germans by over 1,000 euros, above the EU average increase of 840 euros.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ybSGcj Tyler Durden
The popular image of the German industrial machine politics is one which has Germany’s massive factories efficiently churning out goods for trade with the South of Europe (Club Med). Because of the common currency, numerous disparities starting with productivity differences had left the South highly indebted to the North just as the Global Financial Crisis would strike.
The aftermath of that crisis, particularly the second eruption in 2011, posed an economic challenge. Lack of recovery throughout Europe would mean Germany would have to seek its fortunes elsewhere around the world to find new customers in lieu of its old ones being somewhat questionable as to payment.
According to the CIA’s World Factbook, in 2018 two-thirds of all German exports still landed for purchase somewhere inside the rest of Europe. The country’s second largest trading partner is France, after all.
France, though, used be their largest. Germany’s biggest and third biggest export destinations are now the United States and China, respectively. Together, they account for more than 15% of all outbound German trade activity. Along with China, more than 18% of its exported goods ended up somewhere in Asia.
Therefore, Germany’s industrial struggles in 2019 point the finger in the direction of its external focus which we know means the US, China, and Asia.
Earlier this month, the ZEW reported renewed concerns about the state of the German economy. The institute’s sentiment index had rebounded in April to a positive number. This was the hoped-for evidence of the green shoots, the leading edge of what will be a second half rebound after the world’s “transitory” factors disappear.
Over the next several months, however, the ZEW calculates sentiment has moved lower all over again. As of last week and the reading for July, the index has matched the lows of 2018.
In terms of the current situation, the ZEW’s numbers suggest widespread weakness perhaps already turned into contraction.
The situation index this month turned negative for the first time since June 2010. Not once had it fallen into minus territory during the (declared) recession in 2012.
Together, both figures suggest Germany’s economy is in desperate shape (situation) and it doesn’t look like that will change (sentiment) anytime soon.
As if to pile on the bad tidings, IHS Markit reports today that manufacturing continues to contract as negative factors pile up rather than disperse. The manufacturing index fell to 43.1 in July 2019, the lowest in 84 months (the last recession). That number is down from 45.0 in June, the green shoot prerequisite for the second half rebound never really getting out of the contracting side.
It is dragging the entire German economy down with it. The Composite PMI, including both manufacturing and services, fell back to 51.4 in the latest update.
Without Germany’s trade engine, Europe as a whole while hanging in can manage nothing more than the bare minimum sputtering. Markit’s Composite PMI fell to 51.5 this month, down from 52.2 last month. The future does not look bright:
Overall growth of new business meanwhile slowed to near stagnation, its lowest for five months. Manufacturers reported the second-largest drop in new orders since 2012 and service sector inflows of work slipped to the second-lowest in five months.
That’s for the whole of the European economy, not just Germany’s export-bound manufacturers. In the middle of 2019, Europe has practically ground to a halt.
Isn’t that good news? For many, it seems like there is a clock on this thing. A recession or whatever downside has to show up soon or else there can’t be one. Weakness doesn’t just drag on for more than a year; plunge now or it ain’t happening.
That’s not how these things work, though. Everyone remembers the panic in 2008 and how it just came out of nowhere, devastating the world in the blink of an eye. It’s the common perception.
In truth, it took years to get to that point and then nearly a year more before it was all over. Curve inversions and bond market questions had developed in late 2006 – about two years before the final outbreak. Economic weakness had first shown up, in the US and elsewhere, in the early months of 2007.
Ben Bernanke told Congress subprime was contained in March 2007 because there were already serious questions and evident weakening.
What followed, even through the first half of what would only later be called the Great “Recession”, was similar confusion about where things stood. Economic officials and politicians saying everything would clear up, and markets increasingly in doubt. It looked bad, then it didn’t look that bad; the global economy seemed to be holding up and then it didn’t.
The NBER didn’t “officially” declare a recession until December 2008 after more than a year and a half talking about one (and innumerable official assurances it couldnever happen).
It therefore works the other way around; meaning, the longer the weakness lingers the morelikely it is to turn toward a more serious downside. People and businesses will hang on for as long as they can, but if it looks like it will keep going and keep going the more likely they finally just throw in the towel. It is near impossible to predict when, at the same time increasingly straightforward to see the probabilities stacking up unfavorably.
As such, Germany’s woes aren’t really about Germany. They are being transmitted through that country coming from its largest marginal trading partners.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/30XKvg0 Tyler Durden
Boeing’s unprecedented stumble with the 737 MAX 8, along with President Trump’s trade war, have taken a toll on Boeing’s commercial aerospace business, as its Q2 earnings report, released earlier this week, confirmed. And although Airbus, Boeing’s greatest rival, is now the undisputed leader in building planes for commercial flight, but a scandal or setback could easily shake investors’ confidence in Airbus, and with good reason: reports about potentially dangerous software glitches like this one shouldn’t be ignored.
The Register, a British tech news website, reports that some models of Airbus’s A350 airliners, the company’s ‘workhorse’ model, still need to be rebooted after exactly 149 hours of continuous use, even after the EU’s aviation authority ordered Airbus to fix the glitch ASAP.
Now, the EU is issuing a reminder to pilots to make sure to turn their planes on and off again after 149 hours of power-on time, or risk the loss of critical systems in-flight.
In a mandatory airworthiness directive (AD) reissued earlier this week, EASA urged operators to turn their A350s off and on again to prevent “partial or total loss of some avionics systems or functions.”
The revised AD, effective from tomorrow (26 July), exempts only those new A350-941s which have had modified software pre-loaded on the production line. For all other A350-941s, operators need to completely power the airliner down before it reaches 149 hours of continuous power-on time.
Of even greater concern, the regulator and Airbus weren’t aware of the glitch until 2017, when the original AD was issued, as pilots started suffering unexplained losses of certain systems, putting them and their passengers and crew in a very risky situation.
And this glitch apparently went undetected for years. It was only after a few planes suffered in-flight systems failures that they started to look into it.
Concerningly, the original 2017 AD was brought about by “in-service events where a loss of communication occurred between some avionics systems and avionics network” (sic). The impact of the failures ranged from “redundancy loss” to “complete loss on a specific function hosted on common remote data concentrator and core processing input/output modules.”
In layman’s English, this means that prior to 2017, at least some A350s flying passengers were suffering unexplained failures of potentially flight-critical digital systems.
The glitch is similar to one of the problems that afflicted Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner, as the Register explains.
Airbus’ rival Boeing very publicly suffered from a similar time-related problem with its 787 Dreamliner: back in 2015 a memory overflow bug was discovered that caused the 787’s generators to shut themselves down after 248 days of continual power-on operation. A software counter in the generators’ firmware, it was found, would overflow after that precise length of time. The Register is aware that this is not the only software-related problem to have plagued the 787 during its earlier years.
It is common for airliners to be left powered on while parked at airport gates so maintainers can carry out routine systems checks between flights, especially if the aircraft is plugged into ground power.
The remedy for the A350-941 problem is straightforward according to the AD: install Airbus software updates for a permanent cure, or switch the aeroplane off and on again.
Airlines that own these planes and are thus subject to the order include Air France, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and Lufthansa, Air China and Taiwan’s China Airlines.
It also shows that the problem of over-reliance on AI and other advanced software isn’t limited to Boeing: As these technologies become more advanced, and these aerospace companies start to increasingly rely on them, these issues are bound to become more widespread. So, does that make air travel safer, or more dangerous?
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/32Smn03 Tyler Durden
