After a False Abuse Allegation, Child Services Took This Mom’s 3 Children Away


thumb2

Patti Krueger is a stay-at-home mom in Decatur, Illinois. Her husband is a house painter. The couple’s second son, Wyatt, was born in 2017 with severe breathing difficulties.

“He was blue,” says Krueger.

Wyatt spent nine days in neonatal intensive care. Over the next two years his breathing problems necessitated oxygen treatments, tubes in his ears, and four surgeries, according to Krueger.

Some of his treatments were at a nearby hospital in Peoria. Many hospitals today have a Child Abuse Pediatrician (CAP), a doctor on contract with child protective services. Their job is to be on the lookout for child abuse, including abuse other doctors may have missed. While the CAP at this hospital never met Krueger or worked directly with Wyatt, she reviewed his file and accused the mother of Munchausen syndrome by proxy—in other words, causing or faking a child’s illness to get attention.

This CAP’s report was all it took for Illinois’ Department of Child and Family Services to put into place a “safety plan” to remove the Kruegers’ kids. These plans do not require any kind of court order because ostensibly the family “agrees” to it, on pain of potentially having no say over what happens next to their kids. Thus, in March of 2019, when Wyatt was two-years-old and back in the hospital, Krueger’s husband and mother-in-law were in his room when a DCFS worker—and four armed police officers—arrived and ordered them out. They were not allowed back in. Wyatt was alone there for four days while DCFS arranged a foster placement, according to Krueger.

DCFS also came for Wyatt’s older brother, age 3. He had never been away from them before.

But that’s not all: Krueger was also pregnant with their third son at the time. DCFS took him away four hours after she gave birth, according to Krueger.

The family spent 467 days apart. It took an incredible amount of time and money to piece together the evidence that they were not guilty of abuse. In this, they were helped by the Family Justice Resource Center, an Illinois nonprofit founded by Michelle Weidner—a mom who had gone through a similar nightmare ten years earlier. The center helps “families facing wrongful allegations of abuse and neglect, with an emphasis on medically-based allegations,” according to its website.

“They were an answer to our prayers,” says Krueger.

With the help of FJRC, the Kruegers found an attorney in this field, and a well-respected pediatrician to review Wyatt’s files. This doctor found that Wyatt’s illness was not imagined or parent-induced. She also said that genetic testing showing Wyatt had Xia-Gibbs syndrome, a rare disease that causes airway issues. The CAP had shrugged off this possibility.

Meanwhile, Krueger, a recovering addict, underwent weekly drug tests, even though her OB-GYN wrote a letter saying she was fine. She also undertook a psychiatric evaluation administered by a state-approved psychologist (but paid for by the Kruegers), which found her to be of sound mind and not inclined to abuse a child. That was a turning point, she told the American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law:

After a year of being accused of having Munchausen by Proxy, after a year of being accused of being mentally ill, you start to ask yourself, am I as crazy as they think I am? The testing took three days and that was my biggest turning of relief, that I was not going to let these guys make me doubt myself.

During all this, Krueger and her husband were allowed to visit with their children every Tuesday and Thursday from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m., “with someone sitting with us,” says Krueger. “We weren’t even allowed to take them to the bathroom.” The Kruegers were also not allowed to call their kids.

The children screamed and cried just about every time they were put in the car to leave. When COVID-19 hit, they all met on Zoom—again, with a caseworker watching, according to Krueger.

What did it take to convince the state that this entire case had no merit? In the end, $60,000 in legal fees and expert testimony—money the Kruegers’ parents had been saving for retirement.

“And if it cost us this much, I can only imagine what it cost the state,” says Krueger.

On July 8, 2020, a family court judge read the evidence and vacated all orders. The children were finally allowed to come home.

Overwhelmed, Krueger turned right around and started volunteering at the Family Justice Resource Center. Over the past year she has helped reunite four families falsely accused of child abuse. She was honored last month as an FJRC “Family Reunification Hero.”

But the Kruegers did not emerge unscarred. They have mounted cameras throughout their home so that if one of their boys hurts himself, there would be proof it wasn’t child abuse. Understandably, the boys have terrible anxiety. If the kids aren’t warned that pizza is coming, hearing the doorbell sends them running to hide.

“Before this happened, we did not believe DCFS was capable of ripping families apart,” says Krueger. “We thought they helped people.” Her husband had been abandoned by his parents at age three; child services found him and his brother a loving foster home. The Kruegers still believe child services has important work to do, but the system clearly needs stronger guardrails.

The family is now pushing for the legislature to reform the state’s child protection laws, as Texas just did. In that state, if parents are accused of abuse based on a medical report, they can now request a second opinion from a specialist in the relevant field. In a case like the Kruegers’, that means the parents would be able to consult a respiratory doctor, and child services would have to submit this testimony before getting a court order to take a child into custody.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3hiAeWt
via IFTTT

Dean Of Howard University Under Fire For Defending Cosby

Dean Of Howard University Under Fire For Defending Cosby

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

We recently discussed the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturning the conviction of Bill Cosby. While the Court differed on what errors warranted such action, all of the justices agreed that the trial was fundamentally flawed. Indeed, it was a disgrace and Cosby could sue for malicious prosecution.  Yet, the incoming dean of Howard University’s fine arts college, Phylicia Rashad, is under attack for declaring her support for Cosby.

Rashad played Bill Cosby’s TV wife on “The Cosby Show.” 

Fortune reported that there are calls for her resignation.

Rashad tweeted “FINALLY!!!! A terrible wrong is being righted – a miscarriage of justice is corrected!”

UpdateRashad issued a profuse apology and deleted the tweet.

Some have questioned, according to CNBC, “how she might handle sexual assault allegations in her role as dean.”

However, many of us were critical of the trial and it was an injustice. That is why it was overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. That does not mean that Cosby is innocent. I do not believe he was innocent given his incriminating depositions. However, as I said in a prior posting, Bill Cosby is the ultimate example that you do not have to be entirely innocent to be wrongly convicted.

The prior prosecutor did not believe that he could convict Cosby on the evidence available. He instead promised not to prosecute to effectively force Cosby into giving four civil depositions. Even a guilty person can be the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Many believe Cosby is innocent. Many of us believe he is guilty. However, he was denied a fair trial and that made this a miscarriage of justice, as declared by the state Supreme Court.

Rashad responded to the calls for her resignation by insisting that she will fight for the survivors of sexual assault.

Her resignation would be a terrible mistake. I know little about Dean Rashad beyond her television career. However, a resignation would yield to the growing cancel culture on our campuses.  She has every right to express her support for Cosby and considerable justification in describing this trial as a miscarriage of justice.  She and I may disagree about the merits of these claims from 50 women, but higher education thrives on a diversity of such viewpoints.

Update: We are not sure this will help but Bill Cosby called on Howard University to support Rashad’s freedom of speech after she expressed support for him when his sexual assault conviction was overturned.

In a statement, Cosby also lashed out at the media, comparing journalists to the rioters who stormed the Capitol in January.

“Howard University you must support ones Freedom of Speech (Ms. Rashad), which is taught or suppose to be taught everyday at that renowned law school, which resides on your campus,” Cosby said in a statement provided to NPR by his spokesman Andrew Wyatt.

“This mainstream media has become the Insurrectionists, who stormed the Capitol,” Cosby continued in his statement.

“Those same Media Insurrectionists are trying to demolish the Constitution of these United State of America on this Independence Day.”

Cosby concluded by saying, “WE THE PEOPLE STAND IN SUPPORT OF MS. PHYLICIA RASHAD” in all caps.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 11:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3hkNudu Tyler Durden

After a False Abuse Allegation, Child Services Took This Mom’s 3 Children Away


thumb2

Patti Krueger is a stay-at-home mom in Decatur, Illinois. Her husband is a house painter. The couple’s second son, Wyatt, was born in 2017 with severe breathing difficulties.

“He was blue,” says Krueger.

Wyatt spent nine days in neonatal intensive care. Over the next two years his breathing problems necessitated oxygen treatments, tubes in his ears, and four surgeries, according to Krueger.

Some of his treatments were at a nearby hospital in Peoria. Many hospitals today have a Child Abuse Pediatrician (CAP), a doctor on contract with child protective services. Their job is to be on the lookout for child abuse, including abuse other doctors may have missed. While the CAP at this hospital never met Krueger or worked directly with Wyatt, she reviewed his file and accused the mother of Munchausen syndrome by proxy—in other words, causing or faking a child’s illness to get attention.

This CAP’s report was all it took for Illinois’ Department of Child and Family Services to put into place a “safety plan” to remove the Kruegers’ kids. These plans do not require any kind of court order because ostensibly the family “agrees” to it, on pain of potentially having no say over what happens next to their kids. Thus, in March of 2019, when Wyatt was two-years-old and back in the hospital, Krueger’s husband and mother-in-law were in his room when a DCFS worker—and four armed police officers—arrived and ordered them out. They were not allowed back in. Wyatt was alone there for four days while DCFS arranged a foster placement, according to Krueger.

DCFS also came for Wyatt’s older brother, age 3. He had never been away from them before.

But that’s not all: Krueger was also pregnant with their third son at the time. DCFS took him away four hours after she gave birth, according to Krueger.

The family spent 467 days apart. It took an incredible amount of time and money to piece together the evidence that they were not guilty of abuse. In this, they were helped by the Family Justice Resource Center, an Illinois nonprofit founded by Michelle Weidner—a mom who had gone through a similar nightmare ten years earlier. The center helps “families facing wrongful allegations of abuse and neglect, with an emphasis on medically-based allegations,” according to its website.

“They were an answer to our prayers,” says Krueger.

With the help of FJRC, the Kruegers found an attorney in this field, and a well-respected pediatrician to review Wyatt’s files. This doctor found that Wyatt’s illness was not imagined or parent-induced. She also said that genetic testing showing Wyatt had Xia-Gibbs syndrome, a rare disease that causes airway issues. The CAP had shrugged off this possibility.

Meanwhile, Krueger, a recovering addict, underwent weekly drug tests, even though her OB-GYN wrote a letter saying she was fine. She also undertook a psychiatric evaluation administered by a state-approved psychologist (but paid for by the Kruegers), which found her to be of sound mind and not inclined to abuse a child. That was a turning point, she told the American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law:

After a year of being accused of having Munchausen by Proxy, after a year of being accused of being mentally ill, you start to ask yourself, am I as crazy as they think I am? The testing took three days and that was my biggest turning of relief, that I was not going to let these guys make me doubt myself.

During all this, Krueger and her husband were allowed to visit with their children every Tuesday and Thursday from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m., “with someone sitting with us,” says Krueger. “We weren’t even allowed to take them to the bathroom.” The Kruegers were also not allowed to call their kids.

The children screamed and cried just about every time they were put in the car to leave. When COVID-19 hit, they all met on Zoom—again, with a caseworker watching, according to Krueger.

What did it take to convince the state that this entire case had no merit? In the end, $60,000 in legal fees and expert testimony—money the Kruegers’ parents had been saving for retirement.

“And if it cost us this much, I can only imagine what it cost the state,” says Krueger.

On July 8, 2020, a family court judge read the evidence and vacated all orders. The children were finally allowed to come home.

Overwhelmed, Krueger turned right around and started volunteering at the Family Justice Resource Center. Over the past year she has helped reunite four families falsely accused of child abuse. She was honored last month as an FJRC “Family Reunification Hero.”

But the Kruegers did not emerge unscarred. They have mounted cameras throughout their home so that if one of their boys hurts himself, there would be proof it wasn’t child abuse. Understandably, the boys have terrible anxiety. If the kids aren’t warned that pizza is coming, hearing the doorbell sends them running to hide.

“Before this happened, we did not believe DCFS was capable of ripping families apart,” says Krueger. “We thought they helped people.” Her husband had been abandoned by his parents at age three; child services found him and his brother a loving foster home. The Kruegers still believe child services has important work to do, but the system clearly needs stronger guardrails.

The family is now pushing for the legislature to reform the state’s child protection laws, as Texas just did. In that state, if parents are accused of abuse based on a medical report, they can now request a second opinion from a specialist in the relevant field. In a case like the Kruegers’, that means the parents would be able to consult a respiratory doctor, and child services would have to submit this testimony before getting a court order to take a child into custody.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3hiAeWt
via IFTTT

Looters Ransack Bagram Airbase After US Sneaks Out In Middle Of Night

Looters Ransack Bagram Airbase After US Sneaks Out In Middle Of Night

The United States has wound down its ‘forever war’ in Afghanistan by essentially sneaking off from its largest base there in the middle of the night, reportedly without so much as informing the local Afghan commander. 

The somewhat shocking method of departure which immediately left Bagram a “ghost base” – as some are already calling it – was bluntly described by Associated Press as follows: “The U.S. left Afghanistan’s Bagram Airfield after nearly 20 years by shutting off the electricity and slipping away in the night without notifying the base’s new Afghan commander, who discovered the Americans’ departure more than two hours after they left, Afghan military officials said.”

What’s more is that it caught local Afghan forces so off guard that looting immediately resulted the moment the unsecured base was left devoid of Americans. 

The Afghan commander for the area had only initially heard “rumors” of an impending US exit from the airfield, but then soon realized it was already an accomplished fact.

And then the following almost unbelievable scene played out, capping off America’s longest running war in history

Before the Afghan army could take control, the airfield, barely an hour’s drive from the Afghan capital Kabul, was invaded by a small army of looters, who ransacked barrack after barrack and rummaged through giant storage tents before being evicted, according to Afghan military officials.

“At first we thought maybe they were Taliban,” said Abdul Raouf, a soldier of 10 years. He said the the U.S. called from the Kabul airport and said “we are here at the airport in Kabul.”

Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, via AP

It happened days ago but is only just now coming to light, with one Afghan soldier cited by AP as saying, “In one night, they lost all the goodwill of 20 years by leaving the way they did.” More details now emerging are as follows:

The sudden darkness was like a signal to the looters, he said. They entered from the north, smashing through the first barrier, ransacking buildings, loading anything that was not nailed down into trucks.

On Monday, three days after the US departure, Afghan soldiers were still collecting piles of rubbish that included empty water bottles, cans and empty energy drinks left behind by the looters.

Abandoned vehicles left by the Americans:

Via EPA

Despite growing Taliban momentum nationwide amid a serious escalation in attacks on national forces, the Afghan government believes it can hold the sprawling and heavily fortified airbase, which is also home to a prison which holds mostly Taliban-linked inmates. 

The abrupt and under cover of night US departure has reportedly sparked widespread anger among Afghan security forces.

Afghan soldier at abandoned Bagram base, via AFP

Should the Taliban soon threaten Kabul, believed by many analysts to be a likelihood if not near certainty, the group will probably eye overrunning Bagram first to be used as a strategic launching point toward the Afghan capital.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 11:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3AtMgEl Tyler Durden

1619 Project Creator Nikole Hannah-Jones Rejects UNC Tenure Offer

1619 Project Creator Nikole Hannah-Jones Rejects UNC Tenure Offer

The creator of the revisionist (and highly inaccurate) ‘1619 project,’ Nikole Hannah-Jones, has rejected an offer to serve as the chair of the University of North Carolina journalism department, and will instead take a similar position at Howard University, she told CBS on Tuesday.

Jones had originally been offered a contract position by UNC for what has traditionally been a tenured role, after a board member challenged her for not having a ‘traditional academic background,’ which led to a massive backlash that eventually caused the college to reverse course – voting 9-4 to accept her application last week.

“It’s a very difficult decision, not one I wanted to make,” Jones told CBS host Gayle King, adding “To be denied it (tenure) to only have that vote occur on the last possible day, at the last possible moment, after threat of legal action, after weeks of protest, after it became a national scandal, it’s just not something that I want anymore.

UNC’s initial refusal to offer Jones a tenured position sparked outrage among black students. Meanwhile, faculty at the college’s Hussman School of Journalism and Media on Tuesday said they were ‘disappointed, but not surprised’ at Jones’ decision.

As the Daily Mail notes:

Hannah-Jones’ attorneys announced in late June that she would not report for work without tenure.

Earlier this year, Hannah-Jones’ tenure application was halted because she did not come from a ‘traditional academic-type background,’ and trustee Charles Duckett, who vets lifetime appointments, wanted more time to consider her qualifications, university leaders had said. 

When the vote was taken Wednesday, Duckett voted to approve her tenure application. 

Jones won a Pulitzer Price for the New York Times Magazine‘s 1619 project – for which the paper has issued major corrections – seeks to portray America as a fundamentally racist nation founded for the sole reason of oppressing black people (The Federalist). She claims that the desire to maintain a system of slavery was held by “all of” the colonists who fought in the Revolutionary War – claims which The Times was forced to retract – revising it to “some of” the colonists.

Meanwhile, historians have called out the 1619 project for other inaccuracies.

While embroiled in disputes with respected historians about the project’s historical inaccuracies, the corporate media outlet also quietly omitted the controversial “founding” claim “understanding 1619 as our true founding” from the description of the project sometime after August 2019. At the time of this revision’s discovery, Hannah-Jones tried to defend her comments as rhetorical without acknowledging the long list of previous instances where she made the same exact claim that America’s “true founding” occurred in 1619 when the first African slaves arrived in Virginia, as opposed to 1776. -The Federalist

In short – a race baiting revisionist is now going to inspire the hearts and minds of black journalists at Howard University, instead of mostly white journalists at UNC.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 10:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3wpx73j Tyler Durden

Large Explosion Rocks Iranian Oil Field Near Iraq Border, Leaving Multiple Dead

Large Explosion Rocks Iranian Oil Field Near Iraq Border, Leaving Multiple Dead

Iranian state media is reporting that a severe explosion has rocked an oil field in the western Ilam province which borders Iraq on Tuesday afternoon identified as the Cheshmeh Khosh field.

English language Mehr News cites “reports coming in saying that two people have been killed while another is injured” and featured a photo showing a massive fireball rising above the facility. Bloomberg subsequently cited local reports which updated to “Three oil workers killed and four injured in explosion on pipeline that transfers oil from the Cheshmeh Khosh field.”

Via Mehr News

It’s a relatively small field, with official sources estimating an average of 18,000 barrels per day of crude oil production capacity.

Iran’s oil producing regions have been known to experience occasional serious accidents and fires, but with the final rounds of nuclear negotiations happening in Vienna, and with Israel being behind past ‘sabotage’ incidents, naturally there remains the possibility of attack.

The new Tuesday incident comes after yesterday a large mysterious fire was reported outside Tehran.

“A large fire was reported at a warehouse or factory next to a highway near Tehran on Monday afternoon, with the purpose of the warehouse and the background of the incident as of yet unclear,” The Jerusalem Post reported.

“The IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency reported that the fire was near Karaj, the city where an alleged attack targeted a nuclear facility reportedly used to produce centrifuges.”

developing…

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 10:49

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3wpx5Zf Tyler Durden

CNN Says “Tucker Carlson Is The New Alex Jones”

CNN Says “Tucker Carlson Is The New Alex Jones”

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

CNN hosts Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy asserted that “Tucker Carlson is the new Alex Jones” during Stelter’s show after they played clips where Carlson’s rhetoric was similar to Jones’ on several different issues.

After Stelter asked Darcy about the comparison, Darcy remarked, “Tucker Carlson is the new Alex Jones – if you watch Tucker Carlson’s program and you watch Alex Jones’ program – they might differ a little bit in antics and the way they deliver their message, but that message to viewers is consistent and it’s pretty identical.”

Darcy went on to claim that Carlson mirrored Jones in pushing “vaccine conspiracy theories, false flag conspiracy theories, deep state conspiracy theories.”

Stelter then pressed Darcy on whether Jones and Carlson were close friends after playing a clip where Jones said he would let Tucker tackle an issue first on his show.

“Are these two guys in cahoots? Are they friends, do they communicate…are they bros, what do we know about their relationship?” asked Stelter.

“It does sound like they’re talking to each other,” responded Darcy, without explaining why in any way this would be an issue.

Darcy then complained that Tucker seemingly thinks Alex Jones voices ideas “that are legitimate and should be debated,” before labeling them “far right conspiracy theories.”

“I remember when Fox News and the Republican party mocked Alex Jones and said that guy is crazy, we’re not gonna touch that sort of stuff, but now, Fox’s face is effectively Alex Jones – the de facto leader of the Republican party is touting the same stuff that Jones touts on his show,” said Darcy.

Stelter then concluded the segment by attempting to dismiss Carlson’s claim that the NSA is spying on his emails.

Jones himself responded to the hit piece by pointing out that it is merely a ruse to amplify attempts to deplatform Tucker Carlson.

 

Stelter and Darcy were instrumental in lobbying for Jones to be censored when he was banned by multiple platforms back in 2018.

By asserting that Tucker Carlson is no different from Jones, CNN is hoping to pressure Fox News higher-ups and social media networks to drop the ban hammer on Carlson just like they did on Trump and Jones.

The agenda couldn’t be any clearer.

CNN has been hemorrhaging viewers since the start of the year, as experts warn of a “serious credibility problem” caused by the network’s fawning obsequiousness towards the Biden administration.

Fox News’ average viewership has been around double that of CNN during the second quarter, while Brian Stelter’s Reliable Sources show has lost a massive 56 per cent of its viewership since Biden took office.

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 10:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3dPzFRX Tyler Durden

Treasury Yields Are Puking

Treasury Yields Are Puking

As stagflationary signals grow louder (after this morning’s ugly Services survey data), Treasury yields are plunging with 10Y back below 1.50% (testing the post-Fed/Bullad/Quad-Witch chaos puke lows)…

Source: Bloomberg

And 30Y yields have plunged back below 2.00%

Source: Bloomberg

And the pain may just be starting as JPMorgan’s latest Treasury survey showed the world is once again short bonds.

All of which doesn’t bode well for Small Caps (value) relative to Nasdaq (growth)…

Source: Bloomberg

As yields began to reverse so Growth has massively outperformed value…

Source: Bloomberg

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 10:18

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3dQdriL Tyler Durden

Services Surveys Signal Stagflation As Recovery Bounce Peaked In Q2 But Prices Soared

Services Surveys Signal Stagflation As Recovery Bounce Peaked In Q2 But Prices Soared

After a mixed picture in Manufacturing surveys in June (PMI marginally higher, ISM marginally lower), and serially down-trending ‘hard’ data, this morning’s Services surveys show a serious and coordinated disappointment as ISM Servceis tumbled from 64.0 to 60.1 and Markit’s PMI dropped from 70.4 to 64.6…

Source: Bloomberg

Is it time to catch down to reality?

Source: Bloomberg

Most ISM components plunged.

The IHS Markit U.S. Composite PMI Output Index posted 63.7 in June, down from May’s recent high of 68.7. The overall upturn eased following slower output expansions across both the manufacturing and service sectors. Nonetheless, the rate of growth in activity was substantial and the second-fastest on record.

Contributing to the softer upturn in output was a slight moderation in the rate of new business growth during June.

At the same time, cost pressures remained marked in June. Further raw material shortages and hikes in supplier and fuel costs reportedly pushed input prices higher, according to panellists. The rate of cost inflation was the second-quickest on record. Firms passed on greater costs to clients via the secondsharpest increase in average selling prices for goods and services since data collection began in 2009.

Commenting on the latest survey results, Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at IHS Markit, said:

“June saw another month of impressive output growth across the manufacturing and services sectors of the US economy, rounding off the strongest quarterly expansion since data were first available in 2009.

The rate of growth cooled compared to May’s record high, however, adding to signs that the economy’s recovery bounce peaked in the second quarter.

“Some of the easing in the rate of expansion reflects payback after especially strong expansions in prior months as the economy opened up from pandemic-related restrictions, especially in consumer-facing companies. However, many firms reported that business activity had been constrained either by shortages of supplies or difficulties filling vacancies. Backlogs of uncompleted orders are consequently rising at a rate unprecedented in the survey’s history, underscoring how demand is outstripping supply of both goods and services.

“These capacity constraints are not only stifling growth, but also driving prices sharply higher. June saw the second-steepest rise in average prices charged for goods and services in the survey’s 12-year history, though some encouragement can be gleaned from the rate of inflation easing in the service sector compared to May.”

All of which turns the “Stagflation” anxiety dial up to 11…

Source: Bloomberg

What are you going to do Mr.Powell?

Tyler Durden
Tue, 07/06/2021 – 10:04

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3yyb8ZP Tyler Durden

Poll: People Like Amazon More Than Any Institution but the U.S. Military


sipaphotoseleven850082

Amazon more popular than Facebook, Twitter, and many U.S. government institutions. A new survey from The Harris Poll and the Center for American Political Studies at Harvard showcases the extreme popularity of Amazon.

As politicians continue to trash talk the online retail giant and propose new laws to break it up in the name of populism, the survey throws another blow to the idea that this is more than a politics-driven crusade.

The new poll—conducted June 15 through 17 among 2,0006 registered U.S voters—found Amazon with a higher favorability rating than all but one of the 18 institutions that surveyors asked about.

Some 72 percent of survey respondents viewed Amazon favorably. This placed it second only to the U.S. military, which was viewed favorably by 78 percent of those polled, and slightly above police, which earned a 68 percent favorability rating.

Amazon also polled more favorably than the FBI (60 percent favorability), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (58 percent), the Supreme Court (57 percent), Facebook (51 percent), the Department of Justice (49 percent), Israel (47 percent), NATO (46 percent), Black Lives Matter (45 percent), the European Union (41 percent), and Twitter (37 percent).

At the bottom of the favorability rankings were Russia (21 percent favorability), antifa (20 percent), the Palestinian Authority (19 percent), China (18 percent), and Hamas (16 percent).

The poll also looked at the public perception of current U.S. political leaders, finding net favorable ratings of President Joe Biden and mixed reviews of Vice President Kamala Harris.

Biden’s favorability rating stood at 54 percent, with 39 percent unfavorable.

Harris polled at 43 percent favorable and 43 percent unfavorable.

That makes Biden more popular—and Harris less popular—than former President Donald Trump (46 percent favorability) and Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders (45 percent favorability).

None of the other political figures asked about polled at higher than 40 percent favorability. Getting close were Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (38 percent), Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis (36 percent), Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (35 percent), New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer (34 percent), former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (33 percent), South Carolina Republican Sen. Tim Scott (33 percent), and New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (31 percent).

At the lower end of the politician favorability rankings were former Attorney General William Barr (29 percent), West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin (28 percent), Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley (22 percent), Arizona Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (22 percent), Russian leader Vladimir Putin (21 percent), Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar (21 percent), Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib (20 percent), current Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett (18 percent), and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (16 percent).


FREE MINDS 

Laws against teaching critical race theory are un-American, argue Kmele Foster, David French, Jason Stanley, and


FREE MARKETS

How ditching tariffs and export restrictions could save lives:


QUICK HITS

• Cathy Reisenwitz on “How Exodus Cry reinvented the white slavery moral panic for a modern age.

• A vulgar vanity plate showdown in Maine.

• Embryo lawyers nixed: An Alabama law that would’ve granted lawyers to embryos in cases of minors seeking abortions has been ruled unconstitutional by a federal appeals court.

• “Politics is becoming religion in our country,” Utah’s Republican Gov. Spencer Cox complained Sunday on “Face the Nation” in a discussion of Utah vaccination rates. “Politics is becoming sport and entertainment in our country. That everything is political. It is a huge mistake, and it’s caused us to make bad decisions during this pandemic and in other phases of our life as well. It is deeply troubling.”

• Data from Johns Hopkins University shows the disparity in COVID-19 cases between states with low and high vaccination rates. “As of Sunday, states with lower rates of vaccination reported an average of 6 new cases per 100,000 residents every day over the past week,” notes CNN. “States with higher vaccination rates reported an average of 2.2 new cases per 100,000 residents each day over the past week.”

• COVID-19 has dropped from the number one cause of death in the U.S. in January to the 7th leading cause of death in June.

• The Wall Street Journal condemns “Lina Khan’s power grab” at the Federal Trade Commission.

• Jeff Bezos is stepping down as CEO of Amazon.

• Why are Chinese millennials “lying flat”?

• Around a dozen Rise of the Moors militia members got in a standoff with police in Massachusetts over the weekend.

• The Advanced Research Projects Agency proposed by Joe Biden is drawing criticism. “The way Biden would make ‘ARPA-H’ and its $6.5 billion budget part of the sprawling National Institutes of Health is raising concern within the research community and in Congress about whether it will bring a new approach to old problems or become a duplicative bureaucracy with a lofty mandate,” according to Politico.

• On Monday, Maryland’s highest court “denied Gov. Larry Hogan’s request to block a lower court’s order that temporarily prevents the state from cutting off enhanced federal unemployment benefits for workers who lost jobs during the pandemic,” reports The Washington Post. 

• Who will control the Senate after the 2022 elections? “The fight for control of the evenly divided Senate will be the most dramatic showdown of 2022,” suggests CNN, reporting that the states with seats most likely to flip include Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

• BoltBus is indefinitely suspending service.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3hJdPRv
via IFTTT