After Rockets Hit Baghdad Airport Base, US Says Iran Targeting Americans

After Rockets Hit Baghdad Airport Base, US Says Iran Targeting Americans

On Monday four rockets of unknown origin struck an Iraqi military base near the Baghdad International Airport, also site to many US and coalition forces. This follows at least nine “increasingly sophisticated” rocket attacks on joint US-Iraq military facilities over just the past five weeks. 

The Pentagon believes Iran is behind these and other attacks, CNN reports, according to several US defense official sources, who say further Iran’s Shia proxies are involved in planning “new provocations against US troops and interests in the region.”

Monday’s major assault near the sprawling Baghdad airport appeared to target a main training center where US troops advise members of the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service. No Americans were reported hurt; however, six Iraq security force members were injured according to official statements, with two in critical condition.

Baghdad International Airport file photo.

Iraqi security officials believe an even larger attack was planned, given launchers recovered in the aftermath included rockets that hadn’t fired properly.

This week’s attack came days following last Thursday’s incident wherein two Katyusha rockets landed inside Balad air base, known to host US forces and contractors north of Baghdad. 

That attack prompted Secretary of Defense Mark Esper to observe on Saturday that the US has seen a “little bit of an uptick” in such attacks, which is “another indicator for us of Iran reaching out.” 

And the State Department’s Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker also alleged “Iranian-backed militias are now shelling Iraqi bases with American and anti-ISIS Coalition forces on them.”

Via Military Times

Meanwhile, US officials this month cited intelligence saying that for years Iran has been “secretly moving missiles into Iraq,” according to the Jerusalem Post and other international reports. 

Following Monday’s attack Pentagon spokesperson Cdr. Sean Robertson told CNN in a statement: “We have made clear that attacks on US. and Coalition personnel and facilities will not be tolerated and we retain the right to defend ourselves.”

According to multiple reports, the Trump administration is weighing deploying an additional 4,000 to 7,000 troops to the Middle East in the face of Iran tit-for-tat for sanctions.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 12/10/2019 – 15:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/38pYC2a Tyler Durden

Caracas Caves, Releases Jailed American Citgo Executives

Caracas Caves, Releases Jailed American Citgo Executives

Authored by Irina Slav via OilPrice.com,

Venezuela has released six Citgo executives who were arrested and sent to jail on charges of corruption two years ago, Reuters reports, citing unnamed sources.

The prison sentences have apparently been replaced with house arrest, the source said.

The executives – all of them U.S. citizens, five of them with dual citizenship – were first arrested in 2017 and were only brought to court in the middle of 2019, after 18 months in prison. During that hearing, the presiding judge accepted the prosecution’s request for a trial on corruption charges without setting a date.

At the time of the arrest, U.S. authorities requested that its nationals be released, but Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro refused, saying

“These are people born in Venezuela, they’re Venezuelan and they’re going to be judged for being corrupt, thieving traitors.”

According to opposition sources, however, the arrests were not about corruption, but about infighting in the Communist Party as well as an attempt by the government to get its hands on profitable companies to patch up its budget, currently in tatters and with no great improvement prospects.

Reuters reports that U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence and two senators had called on Maduro to release the Citgo executives on worry about their health, after Pence earlier this year met with the families of the arrested men who asked for the U.S. government’s help in the matter.

According to the sources, the six executives—including five former vice presidents of Citgo and a former president—will be banned from leaving Venezuela. No reasons for the release have been provided by Venezuelan authorities.

Citgo, in the meantime, has passed under the control of opposition leader Juan Guaidó with the help of Washington, which was the first government to recognize Guaidó as the legitimate, albeit interim, president of Venezuela, after earlier this year he declared himself interim president until new elections are called.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 12/10/2019 – 15:01

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/345drUl Tyler Durden

ExxonMobil Did Not Mislead Shareholders About Climate Risks, Rules New York Court

Grandstanding New York state Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman began a case in 2015 against ExxonMobil in which he accused the company of lying to its shareholders about what it knew of the risks of climate change to its future profits. The attorney general’s office calculated that the damage to shareholders could be as high as $1.6 billion.

After a three-week civil trial, state Supreme Court Justice Barry Ostrager today ruled, “The Office of the Attorney General failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ExxonMobil made any material misstatements or omissions about its practices and procedures that misled any reasonable investor.”

Basically Justice Ostrager reached the same conclusion I did four years ago about what reasonable investors could surmise from ExxonMobil disclosures. Back then I reported:

“Over the decades, company executives did frequently point to uncertainties in the developing climate science. But this seems have changed after the IPCC issued its Fourth Assessment of climate science in 2006 which stated:

‘Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.’

After that report, for the first time (that I could find at least), the company’s 2006 annual report noted the risks of climate change to its business:

‘Political and Legal Factors: The operations and earnings of the Corporation and its affiliates throughout the world have been, and may in the future be, affected from time to time in varying degree by political and legal factors including … laws and regulations related to environmental or energy security matters, including those addressing alternative energy sources and the risks of global climate change…'”

Justice Ostrager additionally pointed out, “Nothing in this opinion is intended to absolve ExxonMobil from responsibility for contributing to climate change through the emission of greenhouse gases in the production of its fossil fuel products. ExxonMobil is in the business of producing energy, and this is a securities fraud case, not a climate change case.”

According to CNBC, the case against ExxonMobil was dismissed “with prejudice” which means that it is unlikely Letitia James, the state’s current attorney general, will seek to file another lawsuit against the company. Similar shareholder fraud lawsuits have been filed in Massachusetts, Texas, and New Jersey.

For what it’s worth, since ExxonMobil began noting the risks of climate change in its annual reports, its share price has hovered between $56 to $102 and is currently trading at around $69.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Pxgnnv
via IFTTT

What the U.S. Media Get Totally Wrong About Brexit: Daniel Hannan

On December 12, voters in the United Kingdom head to the polls for a general election that will decide the fate of Brexit, the long-delayed British withdrawal from the European Union.

To understand the stakes of the election—which will result in the Conservative Party’s Boris Johnson or Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister—Reason‘s Nick Gillespie sat down with Daniel Hannan, a Conservative member of the European Parliament, one of the leading architects of Brexit. He is also the author of books such as The New Road To Serfdom and Inventing Freedom: How the English-Speaking Peoples Made the Modern World

In a wide-ranging conversation, Hannan explains why British libertarians voted overwhelmingly in favor of Brexit, the urgency of honoring the results of the 2016 referendum in which 52 percent of voters called for leave, and why he believes Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister will set the U.K. on the path to a Venezuelan-style nightmare of neo-socialism.

Edited by Paul Detrick and Meredith Bragg.

Credits: Photo of Prime Minister Boris Johnson with the Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn; Credit: Motoo Naka/AFLO/Newscom Photos of Daniel Hannan MEP; Credit: Matt Crossick/ZUMA Press/Newscom Photo of Brexit protestor; Credit: David Cliff/ZUMA Press/Newscom Photo of Brexit signs; Credit: Martyn Wheatley/ZUMA Press/Newscom Photo of Jeremy Corbyn; Credit: Ray Tang Xinhua News Agency/Newscom Photo of protestor holding sign; Credit: Justin Ng/Retna/Avalon.red/Newscom Photo of newspaper; Credit: ID 69315769 © David Watmough | Dreamstime.com Photo of The New York Times; Credit: ID 73415342 © Ifeelstock | Dreamstime.com

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2P8ArNV
via IFTTT

ExxonMobil Did Not Mislead Shareholders About Climate Risks, Rules New York Court

Grandstanding New York state Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman began a case in 2015 against ExxonMobil in which he accused the company of lying to its shareholders about what it knew of the risks of climate change to its future profits. The attorney general’s office calculated that the damage to shareholders could be as high as $1.6 billion.

After a three-week civil trial, state Supreme Court Justice Barry Ostrager today ruled, “The Office of the Attorney General failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ExxonMobil made any material misstatements or omissions about its practices and procedures that misled any reasonable investor.”

Basically Justice Ostrager reached the same conclusion I did four years ago about what reasonable investors could surmise from ExxonMobil disclosures. Back then I reported:

“Over the decades, company executives did frequently point to uncertainties in the developing climate science. But this seems have changed after the IPCC issued its Fourth Assessment of climate science in 2006 which stated:

‘Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.’

After that report, for the first time (that I could find at least), the company’s 2006 annual report noted the risks of climate change to its business:

‘Political and Legal Factors: The operations and earnings of the Corporation and its affiliates throughout the world have been, and may in the future be, affected from time to time in varying degree by political and legal factors including … laws and regulations related to environmental or energy security matters, including those addressing alternative energy sources and the risks of global climate change…'”

Justice Ostrager additionally pointed out, “Nothing in this opinion is intended to absolve ExxonMobil from responsibility for contributing to climate change through the emission of greenhouse gases in the production of its fossil fuel products. ExxonMobil is in the business of producing energy, and this is a securities fraud case, not a climate change case.”

According to CNBC, the case against ExxonMobil was dismissed “with prejudice” which means that it is unlikely Letitia James, the state’s current attorney general, will seek to file another lawsuit against the company. Similar shareholder fraud lawsuits have been filed in Massachusetts, Texas, and New Jersey.

For what it’s worth, since ExxonMobil began noting the risks of climate change in its annual reports, its share price has hovered between $56 to $102 and is currently trading at around $69.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Pxgnnv
via IFTTT

What the U.S. Media Get Totally Wrong About Brexit: Daniel Hannan

On December 12, voters in the United Kingdom head to the polls for a general election that will decide the fate of Brexit, the long-delayed British withdrawal from the European Union.

To understand the stakes of the election—which will result in the Conservative Party’s Boris Johnson or Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister—Reason‘s Nick Gillespie sat down with Daniel Hannan, a Conservative member of the European Parliament, one of the leading architects of Brexit. He is also the author of books such as The New Road To Serfdom and Inventing Freedom: How the English-Speaking Peoples Made the Modern World

In a wide-ranging conversation, Hannan explains why British libertarians voted overwhelmingly in favor of Brexit, the urgency of honoring the results of the 2016 referendum in which 52 percent of voters called for leave, and why he believes Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister will set the U.K. on the path to a Venezuelan-style nightmare of neo-socialism.

Edited by Paul Detrick and Meredith Bragg.

Credits: Photo of Prime Minister Boris Johnson with the Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn; Credit: Motoo Naka/AFLO/Newscom Photos of Daniel Hannan MEP; Credit: Matt Crossick/ZUMA Press/Newscom Photo of Brexit protestor; Credit: David Cliff/ZUMA Press/Newscom Photo of Brexit signs; Credit: Martyn Wheatley/ZUMA Press/Newscom Photo of Jeremy Corbyn; Credit: Ray Tang Xinhua News Agency/Newscom Photo of protestor holding sign; Credit: Justin Ng/Retna/Avalon.red/Newscom Photo of newspaper; Credit: ID 69315769 © David Watmough | Dreamstime.com Photo of The New York Times; Credit: ID 73415342 © Ifeelstock | Dreamstime.com

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2P8ArNV
via IFTTT

Despite Blowing Millions, Latest Poll Finds Billionaire Bloomberg “Wildly Unpopular”

Despite Blowing Millions, Latest Poll Finds Billionaire Bloomberg “Wildly Unpopular”

It turns out that Americans don’t want to “be like Mike” after all… the other Mike…

A Monmouth University poll found about twice as many registered voters rated Bloomberg negatively as positively — 54% unfavorable, 26% favorable. That margin was significantly worse than for five other Democratic candidates, as well as for President Trump, and as StamfordAdvocate.com reports, that same measure hampered Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016.

And while Bloomberg garnered 5% support nationally for the Democratic nomination, narrowly higher than some other recent polls, the odds of him getting the nomination have been tumbling in the last two weeks

Source: Bloomberg

Which is incredibly ironic – as that’s when he started really ramping up his massive ad campaign

Source: fivethirtyeight.com

Since its launch last month, his campaign has spent more money on ads than all the top-polling Democrats combined and is simultaneously building out ground operations in 27 states.

“Bloomberg said he got into this race because he wants to defeat Trump, but his campaign kicks off with even lower ratings than the incumbent,” said Monmouth polling director Patrick Murray.

That is not the most auspicious start, but views of Bloomberg are not as deeply held as they are for Trump, so he has room to shift those opinions.”

Is it any wonder he is wildly unpopular when he drops truth-bombs like this…

Not making friends or influencing people…


Tyler Durden

Tue, 12/10/2019 – 14:45

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2EbfpI9 Tyler Durden

Barr Skips Over IG Report To Durham, Says FBI May Have Acted In ‘Bad Faith’

Barr Skips Over IG Report To Durham, Says FBI May Have Acted In ‘Bad Faith’

Attorney General William Barr says he believes the FBI may have been operating in “bad faith” when it launched a counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign during the 2016 US election.

[T]hese irregularities, these misstatements, these omissions were not satisfactorily explained,” said Barr in a lengthy interview with NBC, just one day after DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz released the so-called FISA report.

“And I think that leaves open the possibility to infer bad faith. I think it’s premature now to reach a judgment on that, but I think that further work has to be done and that’s what Durham is doing,” he added, referring to US Attorney John Durham – who Barr hand picked to lead a concurrent investigation into the 2016 US election.

Barr described Durham’s role as “Looking at the issue of how it got started. He’s looking at whether or not the narrative of Trump being involved in the Russian interference actually preceded July, and was it in fact what precipitated the trigger for the investigation.”

“He’s also looking at the conduct of the investigation,” added Barr – who then said that he instructed Durham to look just as carefully into the “post-election period.”

“I did that because of some of the stuff that Horowitz has uncovered, which to me is inexplicable. Their case collapsed after the election, and they never told the court, and they kept on getting renewals on these applications. There was documents falsified in order to get these renewals. There was all kinds of withholding of information from the court. And the question really is ‘what was the agenda after the election that kept them pressing ahead, after their case collapsed?’ This is the president of the Untied States!”

Barr, who has characterized the FBI’s actions during Trump-Russia investigation as spying, slammed the Obama DOJ and the press for the Russiagate narrative that President Trump and his campaign colluded with Russia to win the election.

“I think our nation was turned on its head for three years based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by a completely irresponsible press,” Barr said.

Developing…


Tyler Durden

Tue, 12/10/2019 – 14:31

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/38pwFaL Tyler Durden

Diesel Demand Slump Signals Manufacturing Recession Is Still Raging

Diesel Demand Slump Signals Manufacturing Recession Is Still Raging

The U.S. economy is decelerating into an election year and could print below-trend growth by 2H20.

Manufacturing, employment, and inflation have all been in downturns for one year, hence why the Federal Reserve has been quick to slash interest rates, as President Trump has been begging for negative interest rates, quantitative easing, and emergency tax cuts.

New data from Reuters’ John Kemp shows how manufacturing continues to decelerate into year-end as there’s little evidence that growth will trough and zoom higher in early 2020.

Kemp says waning diesel consumption is a significant warning sign of manufacturing output continuing to contract and volume of freight plunging. These factors have put downward pressure on spot oil prices.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data shows consumption of diesel was down 3% in Q3 versus a year earlier.

Kemp notes that diesel is used by “trucking firms, railroads, manufacturers, construction firms, oil and gas drillers, and farmers, so diesel consumption is tightly coupled with the manufacturing cycle.”

He said the drop in diesel consumption relative to gasoline shows that the manufacturing recession is worsening as the consumer is generating slower growth.

Consumption growth of diesel has plunged across the world.

Manufacturing downturns in China, India, Europe, South America, and the U.S. have contributed to declining demand.

As the global economy decelerates into 2020, diesel demand will continue to decline, forcing oversupplied conditions and lower prices.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 12/10/2019 – 14:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3587yqJ Tyler Durden

Truman State University Rejects Animal Rights Club

From the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education letter to the university:

In addition to rejecting [various other] organizations, Truman State has a long history of denying recognition to student organizations promoting vegetarianism or veganism.

In March of 2017, students sought to establish a Vegetarian Club at Truman State. In evaluating its self-described purpose (to, among other things, “inform others on the molestation of other animals so more people support equality for those animals”), the university raised “concerns” that the mission was “very very very extreme.” The committee member evaluating the group wrote:

“The organization doesn’t apply to everyone, I’m not nor will I probably ever be a vegetarian …. It is a diet/lifestyle choice that people make for their own independent reasons. There have also been studies coming out the last few years that point to being vegetarian/vegan might end up being worse for some people due to the lack of nutrients they get while on these diets/lifestyles. So there could be the potential risk of miseducating people interested in joining the club/lifestyle.

One evaluation form, presumably authored by a different member of the committee, noted that the group’s plan to recruit members used the word “convert,” which the committee member characterized as “[e]vangelizing.”

On March 7, 2017, the Vegetarian Club was informed that it had been rejected due to “risk management,” citing the “nature” of the organization. An administrator explained to the group that the university “see[s] serious risk in giving students information on what to eat to be vegetarian and where to get it in the Kirksville community,” and “dietary suggestions should be left to professionals due to the potential for health complications.” In internal records, however, the reasons for the rejection also listed the group’s “purpose” in addition to the “risk management” issues….

On October 16, 2019, Naomi Mathew, a sophomore at Truman State, proposed to establish the “Animal Alliance” club. The Animal Alliance met the objective criteria for establishing a group, including providing an application form, identifying an advisor, and identifying more than ten interested students.

On November 5, Mathew responded to an email from “the team” posing a serious of questions about the group’s application. Mathew was also asked about her plan to “address” the “emotional risk of this subject matter,” how the Animal Alliance planned “to address the emotional risk of having a police presence at events and how that could potentially escalate a situation.” Mathew explained that calling the police was “not the preferred response” and that she hoped “nothing would escalate to that level.” Mathew was also questioned about what “training” the group’s members would “undergo to address potentially hostile students.” Notes written by hand (presumably that of a committee member) on a copy of the group’s responses to the questions highlight the “Risk Org Assumes w/ Affiliation w/ PETA” without elaboration.

On November 13, 2019, Mathew and Astha Thapa, the would-be president of the organization, attended the hearing on the Animal Alliance application. Handwritten notes on the application suggest that at least one committee member was (1) concerned about the group’s plan to “mobilize” in support of animal advocacy, (2) wanted “proof” that the students were “incredibly passionate” about being “the voice for the animals,” and (3) believed that students could “meetup with like-minded individuals” without being a club. Further, an audio recording taken at the hearing reflects that at least one committee member was concerned about the “risk brought about by [Animal Alliance’s] affiliation with PETA.” …

Read the whole thing; I’ve found FIRE’s past factual summaries quite trustworthy.

I also think the exclusion is likely unconstitutional, for the reasons the FIRE letter raises. It’s possible that the university’s process for recognizing student organizations is so selective and subjective (with half the applicants being rejected for various reasons) that the university isn’t really setting up a limited public forum any more, and is instead engaged in some sort of quality-judgment-based benefits program like the one involved in NEA v. Finley. But on balance, I think FIRE likely has the better argument here. And even setting aside whether Truman State’s actions are unconstitutional, I think they reflect badly on it as a university.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2LGPPz7
via IFTTT