CBS Won’t Air Medical Marijuana Ad During the Super Bowl

CBS says it won’t air an ad touting the benefits of medical marijuana during Super LIII on February 3. The network’s decision, while understandable, serves as more proof that the era of marijuana prohibition is far from over.

The goal of the ad from Acreage Holdings, a marijuana investment firm, was to “create an advocacy campaign for constituents who are being lost in the dialogue,” Acreage President George Allen told Bloomberg. “It’s hard to compete with the amount of attention something gets when it airs during the Super Bowl,” he added.

It’s a valid point, as the Super Bowl is usually the most-watched television event of the year. Last year’s game drew a whopping 104.3 million viewers, which was actually down 7 percent from 2017. Those massive viewership numbers mean ad time costs a pretty penny—upward of $5 million for a 30-second commercial.

Acreage was willing to pay that and more, as they hadn’t decided whether to run a 30-second ad or a 60-second one during the big game. But it won’t end up mattering. “CBS will not be accepting any ads for medical marijuana at this time,” the network wrote in a return email after receiving storyboards from Acreage’s ad agency, according to USA Today. A CBS spokesperson confirmed to the outlet that the network does not allow marijuana-related ads.

It’s not hard to understand CBS’s decision. While marijuana is legal for recreational or medical use in 33 out of 50 states, it’s still classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act. Pot prohibition may be collapsing, as Reason‘s Jacob Sullum argued in November, but federal law has not yet caught up.

That not to say there hasn’t been progress. In June, the DEA approved Epidiolex, an epilepsy drug containing cannabidiol (CBD), as a medical treatment. And in September, the agency reclassified Epidiolex as a Schedule V drug, which is the least restrictive category for controlled substances. Plus, while former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was an enemy of legal marijuana (among many other things), the man nominated to replace him, William Barr, says he won’t target state-licensed marijuana businesses.

The fact remains, however, that marijuana is still illegal under federal law. This means, as Barr noted in his confirmation hearing, that the current conflict between federal prohibition and state legalization is “untenable.”

This conflict manifests itself in the affairs of some companies. The NFL, for instance, still prohibits its players from using marijuana, even though recreational weed is legal in eight of the 32 states the league plays in. As Reason‘s Eric Boehm pointed out Sunday, this policy remains in place largely because team owners see the policy as a bargaining chip. However, it’s not hard to imagine that if weed were legal (or at least not outright banned) under federal law, the owners wouldn’t have this leverage.

Similarly, CBS probably wouldn’t have had a problem airing a pro-medical marijuana ad if federal law regarding the matter was less stringent. After all, polling shows that the vast majority of Americans believe medical marijuana should be legal. Considering the conflicts between federal and state laws, however, the network probably decided it was better to stay out of it.

Acreage, for its part, seems to understand the situation. “We’re not particularly surprised that CBS and/or the NFL rejected the content,” Allen told USA Today. “And that is actually less a statement about them and more we think a statement about where we stand right now in this country.”

It’s unfortunate nonetheless. The ad was more a “call to political action” than a commercial for the company itself, Acreage told Bloomberg. “We’re not marketing any of our products or retail in this spot,” Chief Marketing Officer Harris Damashek added to USA Today. The 60-second version of the ad introduced three people who have benefited from medical marijuana, including a young boy suffering from seizures and a military combat veteran who lost part of his leg.

While the ad won’t air during Super Bowl, people will still be able to see it. The company plans to post it online once it’s out of production.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2FTF2iT
via IFTTT

Davos Elites Begrudgingly Admit “It Takes More Than Propping Up The S&P To Drive Global Growth”

This year’s Davos World Economic Forum conference is not for the faint of heart. Pessimism is pervasive – a 180 from the last few years of mutual-masturbation and self-congratulation on a job well done in creating a recovery (in asset prices, if nothing else).

But, as they say, it’s different this time, as ‘Davos Man’ is ‘punched in the face’ of a global economic slowdown and asset price plunge that most definitely was not in their pre-fight plan.

As former fund manager and FX trader Richard Breslow notes, some Davos conferences are better than others. I’ve always resented the ones that were preachy and out of touch. This time around, at least so far, a lot more caution is being expressed, even if tempered with the obligatory notes of optimism.

It’s worth listening… We used to be told that things aren’t great but there was light at the end of the tunnel. Now we hear things are good, but we need to be concerned.

An appropriate bout of candor. And worth considering as we evaluate just what has propelled equities through well-advertised resistance and whether the latest back-up in yields will have legs beyond periodic auction concessions. Not to mention the populist political impetus that is showing no sign of letting up.

Via Bloomberg,

As a sampling of what we’re being told, the IMF has lowered global growth forecasts again. And we are told it isn’t a big deal. I might agree, except that if they keep nudging the numbers lower, eventually it will add up to a real problem that can’t be explained away as technical adjustments. Frankly, it looks like a trend rather than a one-off.

Axel Weber, Chairman of UBS and former Bundesbank president, speaking of ECB policy normalization, said it is “mission aborted” for this cycle because the economy is weakening. For reasons not entirely clear, he still thinks the Fed has one or two hikes in it for 2019, but he went on to discuss pauses and room to cut if necessary. The ECB meets this week and it will fall of deaf ears if a dovish President Draghi gets pushback from any of the hawkish constituent central banks.

Ray Dalio of Bridgewater took the Fed to task for previous rate hikes and, to make matters even more stark, likened global financial and geopolitical conditions to what prevailed in the 1930s. He did the IMF one better by talking about “substandard growth rates” around the world. Especially in Europe. Which is really interesting because I keep getting buy-euro-versus-dollar recommendations based on relative GDP expectations.

And you can’t blame it on something in the Davos water. Which I’m assured is as excellent as always. China’s President Xi Jinping told top members of his government that greater efforts were needed to prevent “major risks,” in remarks that indicated greater urgency than in the past.

One Davos attendee, ex-RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan, for whom I have tremendous respect, observed that the U.S.-China dispute is “far bigger than trade.” That’s really important as equity futures continue to chase every headline. It’s a mistake to oversimplify every geopolitical threat to the global order of things.

Rajan also said it would be good for markets not to depend too much on the Fed. Good luck with that, as the U.S. government shutdown extends into another week.

What we see here has everything to do with economics and nothing at all. What has the attendees spooked isn’t just economic numbers slowing down. That’s how the argument is couched. It’s the begrudgingly-admitted realization that it takes more than propping up the S&P 500 index to make the global economy actually work.

And the gnawing question is whether there is any political will to face the problem.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2R7hb10 Tyler Durden

Top US Diplomat For European Affairs Resigns To Spend Time With Family

Another day, another key government figure exits stage left.

A. Wess Mitchell, 41, the top diplomat in charge of European affairs, will resign from the State Department next month according to the WaPo, creating a key vacancy at a time when European leaders are questioning Trump’s commitment to historic alliances.

However, unlike other prominent diplomat resignations who parted ways with the administration in silent and not so silent protest of Trump’s policies, Mitchell cited personal and professional reasons in a Jan. 4 letter of resignation he submitted to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. His last day as assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs is Feb. 15.

Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs A. Wess Mitchell

As the administration completes its second year in office, I feel that I have completed what I set out to do in taking this position,” he wrote, citing the development of a Europe strategy and helping Pompeo transition into the job after Rex Tillerson was fired in March.

“As such, I believe that the time has come for me to spend more time with my young family, who have endured many days without me over the past several months.”

As noted above, Mitchell said his resignation is not a protest of the administration’s policies or the direction of foreign policy, and he praised Pompeo’s leadership and vision: “I’m fully supportive of him, the job he’s doing, the leadership team here,” he said. “But I feel like I’ve done what I came in to do. My kids have a greater claim to my time right now than the public does.”

In September 2017, Mitchell became the first assistant secretary of state in the Trump administration confirmed by the Senate, and he will be the first Trump appointee to exit.

As the WaPo details, Mitchell came to the State Department from a think tank he co-founded, the Center for European Policy Analysis. He had just published a book, Unquiet Frontier, in which he and Jakub Grygiel criticized President Barack Obama’s foreign policy and argued for the “renovation” of alliances. Grygiel also joined the State Department, working on European issues before leaving last year.

During his 16 months heading the European bureau, Mitchell oversaw relations with 50 countries and important blocs such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the European Union. Many struggle with problems of domestic turmoil or in their relations with Washington.

In Central and Eastern Europe, Mitchell scrapped the Obama-era policy of shunning authoritarian leaders over human rights violations and treated them as potential partners. To the alarm of human rights advocates, Hungary’s foreign minister came to Washington for a series of high-level meetings arranged by Mitchell with Pompeo and John Bolton, the national security adviser.

Mitchell, a fan of nuanced realpolitik, considered the pivot necessary to counter the spread of Russian and Chinese influence through massive energy deals and infrastructure loans.

We have to compete for positive influence,” he said. “What we can’t do is continue the practice of the recent past — of approaching a NATO ally with whom we have some legitimate disagreements on domestic policy, approaching them from a position of criticism, freezing them out of meetings, criticizing them publicly, and then somehow assuming that those countries are going to remain westward looking in their strategic orientation.”

Mitchell sounds some of the same concerns, though he is less confrontational in tone. He said international alliances are advantageous to the United States, but Europe and other allies must share more of the costs when the U.S. national debt is $21 trillion and counting.

“A debt that size, with the strategic commitments the United States has in East Asia and Europe, the defense outlays that the American public is sustaining, for allies who do not spend, who congenitally and systemically refuse to spend more on their own defense, and in many cases, give American businesses an unfair shake in trade — that’s not sustainable,” he said.

But he insists the United States remains committed to its major alliances, especially NATO.

“I know there is this idea out there” to the contrary, he said. “Nothing could be further from the truth. I think it’s important to remember that our diplomats represent all of America. And the alliances as we’ve been running them, from the standpoint of a lot of people in Middle America, it is a fair and legitimate question how we get those burdens right, how we get those balances right.”

Mitchell said he is proud of his work putting together a European component in the national and defense security strategies, emphasizing burden sharing, which is how diplomats describe getting allies to increase their defense spending.

“We’re entering an era of big-power competition,” he said. “The West, U.S. and our allies are underprepared for that transition.”

* * *

Mitchell will join a revolving door of senior officials leaving the Trump administration at the beginning of its third year. The departure comes almost a year after H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser who was instrumental in bringing Mitchell to the administration, was abruptly dismissed. It also creates another vacancy in the ranks of senior officials at the State Department. Currently, six of the 24 spots are awaiting Senate confirmation.

Mitchell does not have another job lined up, beyond teaching his son to throw a baseball and taking his daughter to her first ballet lessons.

“I have two big reasons to do this,” he said of his resignation. “One is named Wesley. The other one is named Charlotte.”

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2R1Qhb3 Tyler Durden

Dow Dumps 300Pts, Stocks Erase Friday ‘Trade-Hope’ Gains

US equity markets have been a one-way trade lower since the open, erasing all of Friday’s gains as China macro disappointed and trade-deal headlines spooked investors…

Dow Futures are down over 300 now…

And all the majors have erased Friday’s gains…

Notably, all the major US indices remain above their 50DMAs but those are critical levels to watch if today’s selloff accelerates…

 

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2REWUoI Tyler Durden

Stossel: Exposing Students to Free Markets

It’s school choice week. Many kids don’t have choice in where they go to school. The school choice movement is trying to give them that opportunity.

Of course, having choice when it comes to what kids learn is important too.

Many schools teach kids that capitalism hurts people.

So John Stossel started a charity called Stossel in the Classroom. It offers teachers free videos that introduce kids to free market ideas. Students rarely hear about these ideas in school.

Graduates from Queens Technical High School in New York City who watched the videos while they were in high school explained that the videos were different from what they were used to.

“They really opened up my mind to think differently” said Xiomara Inga. Antonio Parada added the videos “changed the way that I viewed the world.”

Click here for full text and downloadable versions.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Like us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

The views expressed in this video are solely those of John Stossel; his independent production company, Stossel Productions; and the people he interviews. The claims and opinions set forth in the video and accompanying text are not necessarily those of Reason.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2RZZV2p
via IFTTT

Russian Strategic Bomber Crashes Near Northwestern Air Base; 2 Killed

Two crew members died and two others were injured after a Russian Tu-22M3 supersonic strategic bomber has crashed in northwestern Russia while trying to make a landing at an air base near the city of Olenegorsk in Russia’s Murmansk region during a sudden snowstorm, according to RT.

CNN reported that the incident occurred at 5:40 am ET. The aircraft had four crew members – a commander, co-pilot, navigator and operator – on board. It wasn’t immediately clear which had been killed.

Jet

The aircraft was destroyed on impact, though, seemingly miraculously, two crew members managed to survive and were taken to the hospital. The storm is reportedly a rare kind that only happens in the Arctic. According to RT, it is almost impossible to predict and can develop very rapidly.

The Tupolev Tu-22M3 is a strategic, nuclear-equipped supersonic long-range bomber that has been operational since the late 1980s. According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the crashed aircraft had no weapons on board. The air base near Olenegorsk is operated by a branch of the Russian Air Force that controls long-range fighters and is one of several where Tu-22M3s are deployed.

In addition to being capable of performing nuclear attacks, the Tu-22M3 can be equipped with conventional weapons and weapons enabling it to carry out anti-ship missions.

The crash occurred shortly after Russia carried out its first test of a new hypersonic missile that President Vladimir Putin said will be able to penetrate NATO anti-missile defenses.

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2MnJ8Rt Tyler Durden

Pence Urges Venezuelans To Rise Up Against “Dictator” Maduro After Failed Military Revolt

It appears the White House is ready to stoke the flames of anti-Maduro unrest following Monday’s dramatic failed military revolt launched by 27 low-ranking officers and their subsequent arrests in the Cotiza neighborhood of Caracas, which sparked overnight protests and sporadic clashes with police after opposition leader Juan Guaido made a broad appeal to the military in a speech, urging them to demand Maduro step down. Guaido and other opposition leaders in the National Assembly have declared Wednesday a nation-wide protest day seeking to topple the regime — itself a historic date commemorating the end of Venezuela’s military dictatorship in 1958.

On Tuesday US Vice President Mike Pence urged the Venezuelan people to “make your voices heard” in follow-up to Guaido’s risky appeal, which appears a continuation of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s comments throwing the United States’ full weight behind Venezuela’s opposition seeking to depose President Nicolás Maduro, which he made over a week ago while in the Middle East after Maduro was sworn in to a widely contested six-year second term. 

VP Pence’s words were issued in a video posted to social media wherein he asserted, “Nicolas Maduro is a dictator with no legitimate claim to to power.” The video begins with Pence greeting in Spanish “Hola, I’m Mike Pence” but ending with a somewhat threatening tone aimed at the Maduro regime: “Vayan con Dios!” or “Go with God.”

Pence also praised Guaido, head of the opposition held National Assembly who previously called himself Venezuela’s “legitimate” power, as the “courageous” leader of “the last vestige of democracy in your country,” referencing the legislative body. This week the government-stacked Supreme Court declared it would throw out recent measures by the National Assembly that declared Maduro’s presidency illegitimate.

Pence said in the video he was delivering the message on behalf of Trump and the American people. Referencing the planned Wednesday protests, the vice president said: 

As you make your voices heard tomorrow, on behalf of the American people, we say to all the good people of Venezuela, ‘Estamos con ustedes,’ we are with you.”

The country remains on edge Tuesday as following the mutiny and subsequent successful government crackdown, which further involved the rebellious unit briefly kidnapping several officials stealing weaponry at a police outpost a mere kilometers from the presidential palace, pockets of anti-Maduro protests were sparked in the capital city demanding the release of the detained soldiers, whose actions the government condemned as “treasonous” and “motivated by the dark interests of the extreme right,” according to a statement announced on state TV. Maduro’s right-hand man, Diosdado Cabello, also boasted on Twitter while speaking of the rebels: “They were neutralized, surrendered and captured in record time.”

Pence’s video remarks calling Maduro a “dictator” and essentially calling for a coup comes after months of both the Trump administration and US Congressional leaders becoming increasingly unrestrained in publicly calling for outright regime change. After Monday’s coup attempt Florida Senator Marco Rubio went so far as to encourage more such military defections

Meanwhile Venezuelan Foreign Minister Arreaza just days ago told Democracy Now that “Nothing that the opposition does is without the permission or authorization of the State Department… They say, ‘We have to make consultations with the embassy. We have to make consultations with the Dept of State.'”

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2WaUgWA Tyler Durden

This Year’s Oscar Nominees Are Out. The Big Winner? People Who Like Watching Movies At Home

This year’s Oscar nominees have been announced, and in most ways, the list is incredibly conventional: The Best Picture nominations include a widely praised blockbuster hit by an up-and-coming young director (Black Panther), a crowd-pleasing, star-driven remake with a musical bent (A Star Is Born), a biopic about a rockstar (Bohemian Rhapsody), a couple of movies with sharp political overtones (BlacKkKlansman, Vice), a well-reviewed period drama about racial reconciliation (Green Book), as well as a pair of arthouse favorites by auteurs in their prime (Yorgos Lanthimos’ The Favourite, Alfonso Cuaron’s Roma).

Perhaps the most striking thing about the list is the inclusion of Roma, which was produced by Netflix. This isn’t the first Oscar nod for Netflix (Mudbound scored four nominations last year, but came home empty-handed), but it is the studio’s first Best Picture nomination. And with Roma scoring 10 nominations overall—tied with The Favourite for the most—it’s positioned to potentially take home the Academy’s highest honor.

It’s perhaps the clearest sign yet that movies are moving out of the theater and into your living room, or perhaps onto the screen of your phone. Although Roma played in limited release in theaters, its primary home is on the streaming service, and that’s likely where the majority of its viewers will see it. I have argued in favor of the analog theatrical experience in the past, but in this case, I think Roma‘s streaming availability is a good thing.

The movie’s online distribution is more than a little bit unusual for such a high-profile nominee (Amazon’s Manchester by the Sea was nominated for Best Picture, but it followed a relatively conventional theatrical release pattern). The small-screen availability has caused some consternation in the movie industry; as one Variety critic wrote, Netflix has been “viewed by various sectors of Hollywood as a force arrayed against the primacy of the theatrical experience.” Even Cuaron himself seems slightly uncomfortable with the company’s watch-at-home ethos. He’s said he thinks the film is best experienced the old-fashioned way, on the big screen, declaring in December that “the complete experience of Roma is unquestionably in a movie theater.”

I don’t really disagree. I am a lifelong regular moviegoer, and Roma is exactly the sort of movie that would seem to justify the time and effort it takes to get out of the house and into a theater. It’s a visionary, personal epic constructed of intricately designed long takes that benefit from both the larger viewing format and the (hopefully) distraction-free setting of a movie theater. It’s a film to lose yourself in, rather than just another movie to have on in the background.

Yet there’s something to be said for, and even gained from, Netflix’s platform agnosticism. For one thing, the company’s deep pockets—it reportedly had a content budget of $13 billion in 2018—and revenue model, which doesn’t live or die on box office receipts, are at least part of what allow a black and white, foreign-language exercise in auteurist ambition like this to be made.

It’s also what allows a movie like this to be seen. Netflix has historically been secretive about exact viewership figures, but last week the company released a glimpse into some of its numbers: Bird Box, a genre thriller starring Sandra Bullock, was watched by 80 million households during its first four weeks in release; some of its original series have been seen by about 40 million households. The streaming service now claims it accounts for a full 10 percent of the TV screen time in the country. These are huge numbers, and they make a case that Netflix can deliver audiences as large or larger than any other distributor.

Just a few years ago, a movie like Roma might still have been made and nominated for various awards. But at least on the surface, it’s the sort of less-than-approachable, “difficult” film that, at least when the nominations were announced, probably would have been seen by a relatively small number of people, mostly cinema enthusiasts who live in major population centers with arthouse theaters. Although Netflix has not shared viewing figures for Roma, the film’s streaming release makes a movie like this accessible to a much larger group of people. If you live in a small town far from a major urban hub, you don’t have to wait several months, until long after the awards hype has settled, for a home video release.

I grew up in a place with no arthouse or revival theaters, where it was often difficult to watch critically acclaimed, limited-release favorites, or old classics on the big screen. It often took me months, in some cases years, to track down copies of certain movies, especially obscure, foreign-language films that the local video rental stores didn’t carry. And when I did eventually see them, it was on VHS or later, DVD, at home, on pre-HD TV screens far smaller than what’s common now. I went to the theater about as often as I could, but a lot of my favorite movies are films I’ve never seen on the big screen.

As it happens, that includes Roma. I watched it at home, on a large flatscreen television, and I can only express my appreciation for the movie, and my admiration for what Cuaron has accomplished with it, in terms of awe. It’s not only the best movie of 2018 by a wide margin, it’s one of the two or three best movies of the decade, the sort of film I’m comfortable calling a masterpiece after just one viewing, and a movie I expect to watch many, many more times. And while I’d like to see it in the theater at some point, I know that most of those viewings will occur like the first one, at home. That may not represent the complete experience, but it’s a pretty good one—and, importantly, it’s one that just about anyone can have.

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2FVnqDv
via IFTTT

Tucker Carlson Calls Out Famous Liberals Who Urged Doxing, Assault, & Murder Of Covington MAGA Kids

Tucker Carlson excoriated famous liberals and a few anti-Trump GOP who called for the harassment, assault and murder of a group of Kentucky high school students who were falsely accused of bigotry against a Native American man, Nathan Phillips, at a pro-life demonstration at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C. 

Based on an out-of-context “staredown” between student Nick Sandmann and Phillips, high-profile liberals across Twitter went on a blitzkrieg of fake news over the weekend – falsely claiming that the Covington High School group harassed Phillips while chanting “build the wall,” which never happened. 

Once footage emerged of the entire incident, however, it became clear that the left had gotten it completely wrong; Phillips had approached the teens, while a group of Black Israelites – considered to be a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League – hurled racial insults at the students. 

After the truth emerged, famous liberals who were frothing at the mouth went on a mad scramble to delete their tweets full of hate, slander and disinformation. The internet never forgets, however, and neither does Tucker Carlson: 

 

via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2sFzlgE Tyler Durden

SCOTUS Says Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Can Take Effect…for Now

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 today that the Trump administration’s policy barring many transgender people from joining the military can take effect while lawsuits challenging the ban are ongoing.

The justices voted along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Samuel Alito voted to let the policy take effect. Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer dissented.

President Donald Trump announced the policy via Twitter in July 2017. Transgender people would be barred from serving “in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” he tweeted at the time. The announcement represented a reversal of an Obama administration policy that allowed transgender troops to serve openly.

The legal challenges soon followed. As Reason‘s Scott Shackford documented, various civil rights groups filed suits that the new policy violated the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth Amendment. In the midst of those lawsuits, the administration announced a modified policy last March. Under the new ban, transgender people can join and serve in the military as long as they publicly represent themselves by their biological sex and don’t have a history of gender dysphoria. Transgender individuals who are already in the military can continue to do so, even if they pursue gender transition.

Implementation of the amended policy, however, had still been blocked by various trial courts around the country, according to The New York Times. But earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the policy should not have been blocked by one of those courts because it was not a “blanket ban.”

“The government took substantial steps to cure the procedural deficiencies the court identified in the enjoined 2017 presidential memorandum,” the appeals court said at the time, according to USA Today, adding that the ban “appears to permit some transgender individuals to serve in the military.”

The Supreme Court’s decision today addresses two other injunctions against the ban issued by district court judges in California and Washington State, the Times reported.

The policy can now be implemented pending a ruling on the ban’s constitutionality from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court said. “If a writ of certiorari [following that ruling] is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically,” the ruling reads. “If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgement.”

from Hit & Run http://bit.ly/2S0juHN
via IFTTT