Tropical Storms To ‘Crank’ Up Next Week As Snow Threatens Central US Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 15:15
The National Hurricane Center (NHC) is tracking four disturbances in the Atlantic basin for next week.
“The eastern Atlantic is going to become quite active during the next few days,” AccuWeather Hurricane Expert Dan Kottlowski said.
NHC shows Disutbrances 3 and 4 have less than a 40% probability of developing into tropical cyclones over the next 48 hours. However, about 1,000 miles west of the Cabo Verde Islands is Disturbance 1, which has a 90% chance of intensifying into a storm. Behind Disturbance 1, also called Invest 92L, is a tropical wave coming off the coast of western Africa that should be watched.
“As 92L tracks to the west early this week, it will be within an area of relatively light wind shear and warm water, which should allow it to become better organized and develop into a tropical depression, then a tropical storm,” Kottlowski said.
At the moment, there’s much uncertainty surrounding Invest 92L’s track, though it will cross the Atlantic next week with a west-northwest heading. If the system intensifies, it may pose a risk to the Lesser Antilles late next week.
“All residents and interests of the Lesser Antilles, especially the Leeward Islands should closely monitor the progression of this evolving tropical system,” Kottlowski said.
Another concern is a tropical wave, called Disturbance 2, emerging off the coast of western Africa on Sunday. NHC forecasts the system has a 50% probability of developing into a cyclone.
“This tropical wave is projected to become well organized as it moves off the coast and may quickly take on tropical characteristics, potentially by the time it crosses over or near the Cabo Verde Islands early this week,” Kottlowski said.
Along with a surge in tropical activity, the western and central US will undergo significant temperature changes early next week that may result in snow for some areas.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3lUGEeQ Tyler Durden
Elon Musk Has Now Earned Nearly $9 Billion In Compensation In Less Than 3 Years Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 14:50
The after hours pullback in Tesla shares on Friday after hours – due to the company being snubbed for inclusion to the S&P index – likely isn’t enough to prevent CEO Elon Musk from receiving $2.9 billion more in stock options, putting his executive compensation total at a massive $8.8 billion.
In a matter of less than 36 months after Musk’s pay plan was put into place – a pay plan that had a 10 year runway – the CEO has amazingly hit milestones that have qualified him for billions of dollars in stock options.
With the stock’s recent performance, Musk qualifies for another 8.44 million in stock options, which he will add to the 16.9 million in options he unlocked in may and July, according to Bloomberg.
His latest tranche was unlocked after Tesla’s 6-month and 30-day average trailing market value both exceeded $200 billion. Another performance goal — logging a combined $3 billion of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization topping $3 billion over four quarters — was achieved as of June 30, a filing shows.
Meanwhile, the same report reveals that the average Tesla employee made a median pay of $58,455 last year.
Musk’s compensation goals – as was pointed out by many in early 2018 – had little to do with GAAP profitability and consistent cash flow and instead were focused on 12 market capitalization milestones and 16 revenue and/or EBITDA milestones; the easiest figures to manipulate, should one be so inclined to do so.
Many who were critical of Musk’s compensation plan said it offered little incentive for the company to reach profitability, only to grow in size of market cap. Back in 2018, even the New York Times called Musk hitting his pay plan goals “laughably impossible”.
But instead, Musk did it. And he did it in less than three years.
For a stunning comparison, while Musk was taking in $9 billion in compensation, Tesla was adding to a $6 billion accumulated earnings deficit.
How unlikely is it that Musk would qualify for these options in such a quick time span? Well, the stock would have needed to have done something like this:
Honestly, do people just think this is a coincidence
I mean, seriously. Stock does literally nothing for the better part of a half decade and then the company’s third GC in a year quits, isn’t replaced, and the stock goes parabolic
From an opinion by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Doe v. Indyke (S.D.N.Y.), decided in late June, but just mentioned in the Westlaw Bulletin:
To begin, Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s punitive damages claim on the ground that New York law bars such claims in personal injury suits against representatives of a decedent’s estate. The statute in question, § 11-3.2(a)(1) of New York’s Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (“EPTL”), provides:
“No cause of action for injury to person or property is lost because of the death of the person liable for the injury. For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury.”
As three recent cases in this District, presenting similar claims against the same Defendants, have recognized, this provision clearly prohibits the award of punitive damages in the situation at hand. See Mary Doe v. Indyke, 2020 WL 2036707 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2020); Lisa Doe v. Indyke, 2020 WL 3073219 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2020); Doe 15 v. Indyke, 2020 WL 2086194 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2020) (“New Mexico common law as announced by the state supreme court, like EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1), bars punitive damages in a personal injury action against a tortfeasor’s estate.”). Both federal courts addressing constitutional-tort claims under New York law, and state courts in personal injury actions governed by New York law, have concluded similarly. See Mary Doe, 2020 WL 2036707, at *2 (collecting New York federal and state cases).
This position is also reflected in the majority of United States jurisdictions, as the Restatement (Second) of Torts indicates. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908 cmt. a (Am. Law Inst. 1979) (“Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor.”). The common justification for the majority rule is that “punishment and deterrence—the recognized bases for imposing punitive damages on a tortfeasor—are not advanced by imposing punitive damages on his or her estate.” Mary Doe, 2020 WL 2036707, at *3; see also Blissett v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449, 457 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) (brackets and citation omitted) (“There is a strong policy against the assessment of punitive damages against an estate on account of wrongful conduct of the decedent.”).
The court also held, consistently with past decisions, that New York law applied, because
Plaintiff was domiciled in New York. All of the alleged torts took place in the home Epstein maintained in New York. Further, Plaintiff chose to sue in New York, where her causes of action are timely pursuant to the New York Child Victims Act…. These facts, taken together, demonstrate that New York’s interest in applying its punitive damages rules to this case outweighs the USVI’s interest, which exists only because of Epstein’s decision to probate his estate there. If anything, it is the USVI, and not New York, that has a “merely fortuitous relationship with the case,” minimizing its interest in governing punitive damages.
(The court also concluded that Virgin Islands law would likely also preclude punitive damages against dead tortfeasors, but in any event New York law definitely precluded such damages, and it was New York law that applied.)
from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3bxpyyK
via IFTTT
From an opinion by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Doe v. Indyke (S.D.N.Y.), decided in late June, but just mentioned in the Westlaw Bulletin:
To begin, Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s punitive damages claim on the ground that New York law bars such claims in personal injury suits against representatives of a decedent’s estate. The statute in question, § 11-3.2(a)(1) of New York’s Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (“EPTL”), provides:
“No cause of action for injury to person or property is lost because of the death of the person liable for the injury. For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury.”
As three recent cases in this District, presenting similar claims against the same Defendants, have recognized, this provision clearly prohibits the award of punitive damages in the situation at hand. See Mary Doe v. Indyke, 2020 WL 2036707 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2020); Lisa Doe v. Indyke, 2020 WL 3073219 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2020); Doe 15 v. Indyke, 2020 WL 2086194 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2020) (“New Mexico common law as announced by the state supreme court, like EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1), bars punitive damages in a personal injury action against a tortfeasor’s estate.”). Both federal courts addressing constitutional-tort claims under New York law, and state courts in personal injury actions governed by New York law, have concluded similarly. See Mary Doe, 2020 WL 2036707, at *2 (collecting New York federal and state cases).
This position is also reflected in the majority of United States jurisdictions, as the Restatement (Second) of Torts indicates. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908 cmt. a (Am. Law Inst. 1979) (“Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor.”). The common justification for the majority rule is that “punishment and deterrence—the recognized bases for imposing punitive damages on a tortfeasor—are not advanced by imposing punitive damages on his or her estate.” Mary Doe, 2020 WL 2036707, at *3; see also Blissett v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449, 457 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) (brackets and citation omitted) (“There is a strong policy against the assessment of punitive damages against an estate on account of wrongful conduct of the decedent.”).
The court also held, consistently with past decisions, that New York law applied, because
Plaintiff was domiciled in New York. All of the alleged torts took place in the home Epstein maintained in New York. Further, Plaintiff chose to sue in New York, where her causes of action are timely pursuant to the New York Child Victims Act…. These facts, taken together, demonstrate that New York’s interest in applying its punitive damages rules to this case outweighs the USVI’s interest, which exists only because of Epstein’s decision to probate his estate there. If anything, it is the USVI, and not New York, that has a “merely fortuitous relationship with the case,” minimizing its interest in governing punitive damages.
(The court also concluded that Virgin Islands law would likely also preclude punitive damages against dead tortfeasors, but in any event New York law definitely precluded such damages, and it was New York law that applied.)
from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3bxpyyK
via IFTTT
Kamala Gets Conspiratorial: Says Russians May Cost Biden Election, Won’t Trust Trump On COVID-19 Vaccine Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 14:25
Kamala Harris has gone full Schiff – suggesting in an interview that she thinks Russian interference could cost Joe Biden the election.
Speaking with CNN, Harris said that Russia will be at the “front of the line” when it comes to election interference, according to the Washington Times.
“Could it cost you the White House?” asked CNN‘s Dana Bash.
“Theoretically of course,” replied Harris. “Yes.”
Harris, providing no evidence, continued, “We have classic voter suppression, we have what happened in 2016, which is foreign interference, we have a president who is trying to convince the American people not to believe in the integrity of our election system and compromise their belief that their vote might actually count.”
“These things are all at play and I am very realistic, Joe is very realistic, that until we can win…that there will be many obstacles that people are intentionally placing in front of Americans’ ability to vote.”
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA): “Theoretically, of course” Russian interference could cost Biden the election pic.twitter.com/uIA54jIOhz
In July, Harris said without evidence that she was being targeted on Twitter by “Russian bots” (she also blamed said ‘bots’ for whipping up national outrage over Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the National Anthem).
Going further down the rabbit hole, Harris also said that she wouldn’t trust President Trump when it comes to a COVID-19 vaccine.
When asked if she would personally take any vaccine approved before November, she replied: “I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about. I will not take his word for it.”
She then suggested that Trump would somehow interfere with medical experts and overrule them.
“They’ll be muzzled, they’ll be suppressed, they will be sidelined,” Harris said – parroting a Biden talking point. “Because he’s looking at an election coming up in less than 60 days and he’s grasping to get whatever he can to pretend he has been a leader on this issue when he is not.”
Meanwhile, Dr. Anthony Fauci – Trump’s top COVID-19 adviser, says that the president has “never” gone against science-based advice he’s provided.
Dr. Fauci says President Trump has “never” gone against the science-based advice he provided.
“When he suggests, ‘why don’t we do this?’ And I say, ‘no, that’s really not a good idea from a scientific standpoint’ – he has never overruled me.” pic.twitter.com/2VLwgkR7K5
— Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) March 26, 2020
Perhaps Russia simply hacked Biden’s brain?
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3bJz2Y9 Tyler Durden
UK Reports Most New COVID-19 Cases Since May; India Sees New Record Surge: Live Updates Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 14:00
Summary:
India reports new global recod
UK sees highest case tally since May
Jakarta graveyard overflowing with COVID dead
France expands COVID warnings
Victoria extends lockdown
* * *
While the holiday weekend leads to a drop off in activity in the US, including a decline in COVID-19 testing rates, the UK just reported the highest number of new cases in a single day since May (the latest sign of a coronavirus comeback in Europe) while India cemented a new global daily record after reporting more than 90k new cases.
Britain reported nearly 3,000 new cases, – 2,988 to be exact – on Sunday, its largest daily tally since May 23. The country also saw 2 new deaths, bringing Britain’s death toll to 41,551, and its confirmed case total to 347,152.
A day earlier, the UK reported just 1,813 cases. Daily hospitalizations, meanwhile, have hardly budged from their lows.
Elsewhere in Europe, France placed seven more departments covering major cities including Lille, Strasbourg and Dijon on high alert as the country’s latest outbreaks accelerate. Of France’s 101 mainaland and overseas “departments”, 28 are now considered “red zones.” This comes amid a surge in new cases seen over the past week, but especially over the past 2 days.
On Sunday, India topped its own world record when it reported 90,632 daily new cases, the largest daily tally reported anywhere in the world. The new cases brought India’s total confirmed caseload to 4.11 million.
Meanwhile, the number of deaths in the world’s second-most-populous country rose by 1,065 to 70,626.
India is set to pass Brazil on Monday as the second-most affected country by total infections. After that, it will be behind only the US in terms of total cases.
While a recent testing campaign has been blamed for the country’s record-beating numbers, testing isn’t the only issue. India is in second place worldwide when it comes to overall tests administered, with 47,831,145, behind the US, with 86,763,797. But its rate is 35,322 per million compared with the global average of 69,512, the US with 261,844 and Brazil with 67,696.
Despite fervent protests that led to hundreds of arrests the other day, Australia’s coronavirus hotspot state of Victoria on Sunday extended its “hard” lockdown once again, adding another two weeks, which extends it until the end of September as infection rates have declined more slowly than hoped.
State Premier Daniel Andrews on Sunday extended the hard lockdown, in place since August 2, to September 28 with a slight relaxation, and explained how restrictions would gradually decline over the coming two months. The extension comes after Australia slumped into its first recession in decades.
Victoria, Australia’s second-most populous state, has been the epicentre of a second wave of the novel coronavirus, now accounting for roughly 75% of the country’s 26,282 cases and 90% of its 753 deaths.
The state on Sunday reported 63 new COVID-19 infections and five deaths, down from a peak of 725 new cases reported on Aug. 5.
Finally, as Philippines and Indonesia cement their status as the worst outbreaks in Southeast Asia, Al Jazeera reports that a cemetery in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta is reportedly running out of space as the number of deaths linked to the coronavirus continues to rise. Unfortunately, in swampy Jakarta, using portable refrigeration trucks might not be feasible, like it was in New York. Indonesia has reported roughly 190,000 cases, and roughly 8,000 dead.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2EUIBHH Tyler Durden
Connecting The Dots: How SoftBank Made Billions Using The Biggest “Gamma Squeeze” In History Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 13:35
It was back in July when we first reported that Goldman had observed a “historic inversion” in the stock market: for the first time ever, the average daily value of options traded has exceeded shares for the first time, with July single stock options volumes hitting 114% of shares volumes.
This followed a May report in which we discussed “how retail investors took over the stock market”, pointing out the “recent surge in options trading – which has far more impact on market flows due to embedded leverage” and cited Goldman data which showed that “individual investor active trading is playing an increased role in market volatility, particularly in select stocks. In the shares market, 2.3% of all volume is made up of trades for $2,000 or less. The increase in small trades has been even more notable in the options market, where 13% of all trades are for 1 contract.”
We also pointed out that “a significant portion of this increase has been driven by higher volumes in short dated contracts, as investors are literally using massive leverage to wager on near-term momentum moves such as those often highlighted OTM calls traded in Tesla stock.”
The last clue that an entire generation of investors were flooding into options (read calls) was the surge in individual investor option activity in both the top 50 and the top 500 US names, which has continued a steady climb since the start of the year.
To be sure, this option frenzy was a goldmine for retail brokerages such as Robinhood, Schwab and Etrade, which reported options trading activity surging 129% YTD (up 35% from June levels), which helped explain why various HFT outfits are paying so much to frontrun Robinhood option trades.
Finally, we also pointed out where the option trading footprint was largest, and not surprisingly we showed that options volumes had been driven higher by an increase in trading in many of the large market cap names. AMZN, TSLA, AAPL, NFLX and FB had the highest volumes in July. Among the top 25 underliers with high notional volumes, MRNA, WMT, NKLA and TSLA saw the biggest jump relative to the prior 12-months.
Also of note, bullish sentiment in a number of names as indicated by options market skew, was at extremely high levels. Three-month normalized put-call skew in AMZN, TSLA, SQ and MRNA had declined to below 0 as of two months ago, a striking development because as Goldman notes, “negative skew is a relatively rare statistic for large cap names such as AMZN (where three month skew is currently at all-time lows), implying crowding in long AMZN calls.”
Fast forward to last week when we first showed that these trends had accelerated to an unprecedented degree, and the implied vol among some of the giga-cap names had exploded to insane levels even as the stock was trading at all time highs with a market cap of $2.2 trillion…
… while the plunge in option skew, first highlighted in July, had also hit unprecedented levels.
These bizarre trends, where one or more players where furiously buying calls and pushing both the implied vol and gamma (in both single stocks and the broader market) ever higher even while dealers were caught short gamma and were forced to chase stock price to obscene levels, creating a feedback loop where the more calls were bought, the higher the underlying stock price surged, leading to even more call buying and the paradox of a record high vix at an all time high in the S&P500 (in fact the last time we had observed such a confluence was the day the dot com bubble burst)…
… led us to explain last Wednesday that “an epic battle was raging beneath the market surface” where as Nomura’s Charlie McElligott said that “street-wide, Dealers are short Gamma / short Calls off the back of the MASSIVE upside premium buyer (as in BILLIONS spent) who has been in the market over the past month or so in a number of mega-cap single-name Tech cos.”
Putting it all together, we said that “a combination of market euphoria, free options trading, and most importantly, few market-makers have sparked the fire” indicating that a key player in all this was indeed retail investors. We then added that it also meant that “a few large funds understood this and have added fuel to the fire by pushing implied higher and higher and putting further pressure on the likes of Citadel and Goldman. With this process helping drive names like Apple and Tesla, this also makes sense why Breadth has been so terrible.”
The punchline, for all those who had been looking at the market action in recent weeks in stunned silence, was that “while most of the market is fading lower we are seeing a battle between a few big hedge funds and banks who are getting shorter and shorter gamma.“
It all came into place on Thursday when we first reported that contrary to expectations that the furious melt up of July and August was solely due to a buying frenzy among retail speculators, the identity of the “mystery marketwide call buyer” – or “nasdaq whale” as he was later dubbed – was none other than SoftBank and its founder, Masa Son. This is what we said:
It is hardly unreasonable to imagine SoftBank, the “brains” behind such catastrophic investments as WeWork, WireFraud WireCard, and countless other failed “unicorns” would desperately try to Volkswagen not just a handful of tech names, but the entire market in the process. After all, Masa Son is desperate to deflect attention from the fact that as we put it last October, ” SoftBank is the Bubble Era’s “Short Of The Century.” And if there is one thing that can salvage the Japanese VC titan’s reputation it is a second tech bubble which blows out the valuation of his countless (otherwise worthless) investments…
One day later both the FT and the WSJ confirmed that it was indeed SoftBank which was using a “positive gamma” strategy of buying up single name stocks, which it then propelled higher by buying calls in the same stock, if not sparking then certainly accelerating the gamma feedback loop which we first described last Tuesday before the SoftBank presence was reported in “A Classic Feedback Loop”: Why Everyone Is Chasing The “Gamma Crash Up” as both single name implied vol and the overall VIX surged alongside stocks (resulting in a historic inversion in the S&P-VIX correlation)…
… sending both the FAAMGs, the Nasdaq and the S&P500 to all time highs.
In retrospect it should have been obvious not just to us but everyone what was going on.
After all, it was in early August that we first learned that for the first time SoftBank was targeting investments of more than $10 billion in public stocks as part of a new asset management arm, far exceeding the initial holdings that founder Masayoshi Son outlined to shareholders in the company’s latest earnings call, and a break from the company’s strategy of investing in private names.
None of this was a secret, because on Aug 11, Son said SoftBank had acquired major holdings in not only the FAAMG stocks but some of the highest beta, “story” tech names.
Of course, the biggest hint was Bloomberg’s report in mid-August that SoftBank’s “investments were made using financing structures that can prevent SoftBank from showing up in public records as a direct shareholder.” Because why hide its footprints if it wasn’t engaging in a trade that would spark a historic surge in the very same public names it had just purchased, and which would gradually seep over to the broader market, sending the S&P to a record high of 3,580 just a few days ago.
There was also another reason why Masa Son desperately felt the need to spark a massive ramp in public stocks (conveniently taking place at a time in the year when markets were especially sleepy, during the vacation breaks of August): having seen his reputation and credibility crushed after the WeWork and WireFraud fiascos, the new unit reflected Son’s revived ambitions to secure tens of billions in fresh outside capital after the bombing of the second Vision Fund. And what better way to do it than to show a remarkable return on his brand, spanking new investments in public FAAMG stocks:
The founder had said in May that SoftBank was unlikely to secure outside investors for a second Vision Fund after problems with the first. But in the upbeat financial results Tuesday, Son expressed readiness to accelerate a companywide shift from telecom to investing. “Our strategy hasn’t changed,” Son said. “We still plan on unicorn hunting with Vision Fund two, three and so on.”
Which brings us to the “brains” behind the strategy, which we now know is Akshay Naheta, a SoftBank senior vice president in Abu Dhabi, who is the head of SoftBank’s new asset management team (i.e., the brand new team investing in public companies) and who was hired in Jan 2017 from the London-based Knight Assets which he founded, and where he focused on “arbitrage and value investing.”
Remarkably, Knight’s investments had generated a staggering IRRs of 112.5% annually since its 2011 launch, and one wonders just how much of the fund’s impressive performance was the result of similar gamma loops. One also wonders why Akshay would leave what was arguably one of the best performing buyside platforms last decade?
And where did Akshay learn the tools of the trade? Why at that “pristine” bank which has “never” had any legal issues or record criminal and civil settlements: Deutsche Bank, where Naheta was Head of Principal Strategies, “responsible for proprietary trading and structured deals, managing risk across various asset classes globally.”
Surely this financial wizard is a Wharton grad – after all for him to have such phenomenal “deep value” investing acumen, he must have learned from the best. Wrong: the SoftBank gamma guru graduated from MIT with an M.Sc in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 2004, following an undergrad from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where he graduated with a B.S., highest honors, in, drumroll, Electrical Engineering.
If JPM’s Bruno Iskil was the London whale, perhaps we should now call Askhay the “Gamma whale.”
One almost wonders how much of a role in the marketwide gamma that flooded across markets in the past month did this computer science expert relegate to HFTs, whose momentum buying he knew would be sparked the moment SoftBank indicated it was splurging on calls across the most popular tech names, especially with HFTs frontrunning similar call buying over at retail frenzy ground zero, Robinhood, which made a killing in option trading payment for orderflow in June according to its 606 Report. We can only imagine what July and August will look like.
Conveniently, Askhay had Robinhood to help him, because having observed the furious retail call buying which we described from May across July (see above), Askhay realized that all he needs to do is pour a little extra gasoline on the fire, show a few outsized trades to the HFTs which would then unleash a cascade of call buying on their own, resulting in massive – and free – leverage of SoftBank’s own call buying trade.
As an aside, we find it rather remarkable that some of the most prominent Deutsche Bank traders are now at SoftBank. Yes, there’s Akshay triggering the biggest gamma squeeze in history, but we learned in 2018 that Colin Fan, former co-head of Deutsche’s investment bank who made MD at 28, and one-time head of Deutsche’s trading business had also joined SoftBank, where he was reunited with Rajeev Misra, Deutsche’s former head of global credit trading, and the current head of Softbank’s $100BN Vision Fund.
Other Deutsche Bank alumni, Nizar Al-Bassam, Michele Faissola (who was implicated in the death of DB’s senior risk manager, William S. Broeksmit, who was found dead in 2014 after committing a still unexplained suicide) and Wayne Grigull, work for or advise (Faissola is an advisor) Centricus Advisors (formerly known as F.A.B. Partners) and helped the Vision Fund raise its Saudi money. Many worked together at Merrill Lynch before joining Deutsche Bank. As EFC noted some time ago, “they have history.”
Keeping a close eye on these former Deutsche Bankers, now at SoftBank, is imperative.
* * *
Which brings us to what is perhaps the last loose end: how much money did Akshay – and SoftBank – make using this strategy? Aaccording to some original (for a change) reporting by the FT, SoftBank is currently sitting on unbooked profits of about $4 billion. This is roughly the same amount as SoftBank has spent on call premiums over the past few months – as it built up a massive position equivalent to roughly $30 billion in notional exposure – meaning it has essentially generated a 100% IRR.
Of course, as we noted yesterday, despite being exposed as the fund behind the market’s bizarre August moves, implied vol has yet to drop which means that SoftBank is likely still in the trade and has yet to take a profit…
… or that dealers have not yet figured out a proper strategy to hammer implied vol. One thing that is certain is that it is only a matter of time before dealers, who were counterparties to the SoftBank trade and are likely nursing billions in losses (assuming they didn’t delta-hedge all of their exposure) will do everything in their power to punish the Japanese conglomerate. And even if they did fully delta-hedge their outlier gamma exposure, now that the FAAMG rally has broken, the precipitous ramp observed on the way up is about to reverse as dealers start dumping the stocks they had to buy as gamma spiked, leading to a mirror image of the melt up trade. In short, while SoftBank may have made a 100% profit, unless it somehow unwinds this trade asap, it risks losing not only all of its gains but also suffer material losses that would eat into the option premium and would then also hammer the value of its underlying stock investments.
The bottom line is that as one unnamed trader quoted by the FT said, “it’s just a levered punt on the market. The whole strategy is just momentum buying.“
Well of course it is, but it had not only the benefit of massive leverage, but also timing, striking just as there was virtually nobody in the market to take the opposite side of the trade while piggybacking on a call-buying frenzy among the retail community, something any trader with a background in HFT/market structure inefficiencies such as a Akhsay would be well aware of.
The only question we have now is what happens to SoftBank – whose reputation for foolhardy leeroy jenkins-tyle investments with little to no diligence but merely seeking to manipulate the market with its size and scope precedes it, once the momentum reverses, and after hunting dealers with a max painful gamma squeeze, dealers now return the favor.
The answer: probably not much – recall that the BOJ is now the biggest investor in Japan’s ETFs, and with SoftBank widely held not only by Japan-focused ETFs but also by Trust banks through which the BOJ operates, it is safe to say that the Japanese central bank is one of the top investors in SoftBank, if not bigger even than Masa Son himself with his 21% holding.
Add the fact that Japan’s pensioners via the GPIF are among the top investors in SoftBank (which among other thing, means that the fate of Japan’s pension funds is now directly tied to the performance of AAPL and TSLA calls), not to mention that the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, the Norges Bank is also a top 15 investors…
… and it is clear that nothing bad can ever happen to SoftBank – even if this particular momentum trade were to crash and burn – simply because a failure of this particular “Nasdaq whale” would be far too systemic, causing massive losses among both sovereign wealth fund and central banks, and it would promptly receive a bailout from the BOJ, something we first suggested last year.
In fact, the fact that SoftBank is now too big to fail is – in our view – the true reason behind Masa Son’s unprecedented gamma gamble: after all if the trade succeeds Masa wins, if the trade loses it is the merely taxpayers that lose (as they always do in the end)… something which apparently was not lost on Akshay himself:
This is why capitalism is breaking down! Our future includes a significant increase in taxes to counter these government-backed bailout policies at any sign of “trouble”. The Fed’s policies have exacerbated inequality and tensions in the social fabric. https://t.co/H8UmloRhhK
Trump Tweets: “Baltimore’s Poverty & Crime Will Only Get Worse Unless You Elect Kim Klasick” Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 13:14
Baltimore-based GOP Congressional candidate Kim Klasick gained a national media profile thanks to a viral campaign ad accusing Democrats of failing to revive Baltimore, and encouraging blacks in the city and some surrounding suburbs to try voting Republican for a change.
Now, President Trump has endorsed Klasick with one of his typical endorsements via tweet, while urging Baltimore to “be smart” and reject the pandering Democrats who are unwilling to make the necessary changes to save the city from the twin scourges of crime and drugs.
Be smart Baltimore! You have been ripped off for years by the Democrats, & gotten nothing but poverty & crime. It will only get worse UNLESS YOU ELECT KIMBERLY KLACIK TO CONGRESS. She brings with her the power & ECONOMIC STRENGTH OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. She works sooo hard….
….Baltimore will turn around, and I will help. Crime will go way down, money and jobs will pour in. Life will be MUCH better because Kimberly really cares. The Dems have had 100 years and they gave you nothing but heartache. Baltimore is the WORST IN NATION, Kimberly will..
….fix it, and fast. The current recipient has no chance, and won’t even try. As I have often said, Baltimore is last in everything, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU HAVE TO LOSE! Kimberly is fully Endorsed by me, something I do not do lightly. Take advantage of it and MAKE BALTIMORE GREAT!
Trump insisted that “Baltimore will turn around, and I will help. Crime will go way down, money and jobs will pour in. Life will be MUCH better because Kimberly really cares. The Dems have had 100 years and they gave you nothing but heartache. Baltimore is the WORST IN NATION, Kimberly will fix it, and fast!”
Maryland is a reliably Democratic state, and Baltimore a solidly Democratic city, with more than 5x the number of registered Dems as registered GOP. Trump initially praised Klasick after her convention speech, so his endorsement is hardly a shock.
But maybe with the aid of a national media profile, Klasick might have a shot to fill the seat – representing Maryland’s 7th District – once held by Elijah Cummings, a seat which has been held by Democrats for nearly 70 years.
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/35bt5Sv Tyler Durden
Former NYT Reporter Challenges Dr. Fauci’s Climate Change “Mission Creep” Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/06/2020 – 12:45
For anybody who isn’t already suspicious of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s self-aggrandizing ways, former NYT reporter Alex Berenson has called the “bureaucrat” out for trying to overstep his authority by proposing nothing short of a radical restructuring of society to ensure humanity’s survival during the “pandemic era”.
It might sound far-fetched, but in a paper recently published in the journal Cell, Dr. Fauci claimed that the world had entered a new “pandemic era”, and claimed that an onslaught of infectious diseases is already transitioning from animals to humans via ‘zoonotic transmission’. Going off on a seemingly absurd, pseudo-scientific, tangent, Dr. Fauci claimed that “industrialization” is to blame for infectious diseases like COVID-19, and the only remedy is to live “in harmony with nature”.
We suspect the good doctor is a fan of Greta Thunburg and her fellow “climate activists”.
Of course, who benefits from this level of conjecture? Only Dr. Fauci, as he begins selling his vaguely progressive sound “solution” to humanity’s newest problem. “There are many examples where disease emergences reflect our increasing inability to live in harmony with nature,” Dr. Fauci wrote.
But in a twitter thread that went viral, Berenson takes Dr, Fauci to task for “mission creep”.
1/ Hoo boy. Dr. Anthony Fauci has some advice for us.#Sars-Cov-2 is just the beginning. We’re in a “pandemic era” now, friends.
2/ “Living in greater harmony with nature will require changes in human behavior as well as other radical changes that may take decades to achieve: rebuilding the infrastructures of human existence, from cities to homes to workplaces… to recreational and gatherings venues.”
3/ “In a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly provoke new disease emergence.”
Huh. Sounds like human domination is the real problem here?
5/ But, see, if #COVID-19 turns out to be a testing-driven lil-bit-worse-than-a-bad-flu year, what then? Maybe we WON’T need to redesign all of human existence because some 79-year-old bureaucrat wants us to?
Others who commented on Berenson’s tweets pointed out how the “Green New Deal” and the climate extinction movement loomed large in Dr. Fauci’s new “pseudo-science” based anti-human ideology.
I sense a Green Nude Eel lurking there somewhere.
— Archibald Heatherington Nastyface (@ArchibaldHeath1) September 4, 2020
Because once COVID-19 is finally under control, pandemics will join wildfires and hurricanes as one more natural ill that can potentially be tamed via the “Green New Deal” and other radical proposals to fight “climate change.”
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/35dfp9E Tyler Durden
Last week, I noted here that a relatively rare condition had arisen in which stocks and expected volatility had risen at the same time. Last week, I noted on twitter that the Nasdaq Composite and its volatility index (VXN) had never been more positively correlated than they have over the past 10 days. This week, I’d like to briefly put forth my best guess as to why this is happening.
As noted by Jason Goepfert, speculative call buying has recently surged to levels never seen before.
Speculative options trading reached the equivalent of 12% of NYSE volume last week.
Like some combustible combo of musical chairs, Russian roulette, and five finger fillet.
At the same time, market makers selling all those call options to the traders buying them are forced to hedge by buying the underlying stocks.
‘If short gamma hedging lifted stocks, logically it should also be capable of exacerbating moves the other way. When shares fall, market makers are likely to unwind hedges at an increasing speed, spurring more losses.’ https://t.co/ojNZvf97WD