“Someone Big Was Utterly Blown The F**k Out”: Here’s The Reason Behind Today’s Unprecedented VIX Move

“Someone Big Was Utterly Blown The F**k Out”: Here’s The Reason Behind Today’s Unprecedented VIX Move

There was a bizarre moment this afternoon, when in the 40 minutes heading into the final hour of trading, the VIX kept rising and rising, preventing the S&P from doing its sworn duty of spiking higher into the weekend. And then, just after 310pm ET (or 1210 PT), the VIX collapsed, plunging by as much as 14 vols from 54.39 – the highest print since Lehman – to 40.84, the low for the day, and unleashing another unprecedented buying cascade, which almost sent the Dow green. 

What happened?

As the following chat session between three individuals, which includes a former CME index option trader (X), all of whom wish to remain anonymous lays out, what happened is that the VIX ramped as a major Chicago market maker was caught in a “short gamma” squeeze, which forced them to keep buying the VIX as the VIX soared, in the process ending the VIX even higher, only to get margin called out of their position by their clearing firm, puking their entire position, and unleashing the VIX avalanche and the 700 Dow point rally. Regular readers will recognize this pattern: it is what happened, only not with the VIX by the ES, back in February 2017, when the Catalyst Hedged Futures Strategy Fund pushed the entire market higher when it, itself, was caught in a similar gamma trap.

Below the the full chat laying out what happened:

X: Someone got carried out of the pit in spx options 15 minutes ago

X: Utterly blown the fuck out

X: Their clearing firm literally liquidated some big market maker in Chicago hahahaha

X: Go to Ceres today

Y: Omfg

X: Someone big literally doesn’t exist anymore

X: WE’RE RUINED MORTIMER

X: It caused a huge dislocation in the vix

X: You could see them blow out 😂

X: God i feel so happy now

X: (Ssssiiiippp)

Z: Someone hacked into this Boise publication and is posting redpills on their Twitter

Z: [link to Boise Weekly hacked twitter account]

Z: Is one of those degenerate leftist weekly publications so common in urban areas

X: Lol nice

Z: What’s going on with the spx?

X: Bro

X: What a lollercoaster

X: Im in cloud 9 right now

X: My old he lush trading firm blew out vs vix 32

X: Now someone else the same size did it vs 48 haha

X: Old hellish*

X: Consolidated trading blew out vs vix 32 last week

X: Verifiable true

Z: Do you know the other firm?

X: I wanna say they were the 4th largest market maker in chicago

X: Asking my friend. Trying to find out

[pictures of VIX vs /ES[H2O] on TOS]

X: That dramatic rise in the vix is inconsistent with the speed and depth of the fall in sp500

X: Someone literally got liquidated around 3 eastern

X: [Z] tell them about consolidated trading

X: “Consolidated Trading was well known across Chicago as degenerate risk takers who would always maintain a short vol/gamma position regardless of market conditions. Finally bit them in the ass last week and they blew out even after the market gave them tons of opportunity to get flat or long vs vix 23”

X: [Screenshot of another chat he’s in]:

Q: Vix 52

Q: 14 day vol is 60 lol

Q: Bro

Q: Someone big in Chicago just got carried out of the pit

Q: Their clearing firm mega puking them out CAUSED A SEVEN POINT DROP IN THE VIX

Q: Reversed in minutes

Q: MORTIMER WE’RE RUINED lmfao]

And that’s what’s behind 700 point move today.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 19:23

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2InWfBd Tyler Durden

Surveillance Court Bans FBI and DOJ Officials Who Erred in Carter Page Wiretap Applications

Surveillance Court Bans FBI and DOJ Officials Who Erred in Carter Page Wiretap Applications

Authored by Ivan Pentchoukov via The Epoch Times,

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) on March 5 effectively barred FBI and Justice Department officials involved in the infamous application to surveil former Trump campaign associate Carter Page.

Carter Page

The chief justice of the secret court, James Boasberg, ordered the ban in a 19-page opinion, the latest in a series of developments triggered by the release of the condemning report by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), which examined the four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications the FBI used to spy on Page.

Boasberg wrote, “No DOJ or FBI personnel under disciplinary or criminal review relating to their work on FISA applications shall participate in drafting, verifying, reviewing, or submitting such applications to the court.”

Boasberg also accepted a detailed plan put forth by the FBI to prevent the kinds of significant omissions and misstatements that made their way into the Page FISA applications despite significant vetting by top officials at the bureau and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The court is encouraged by the government’s responses to the OIG report and its orders, as the FBI and DOJ have each indicated that the flaws identified in the OIG Report require significant and systemic remedial action,” Boasberg wrote.

The DOJ inspector general released a report in December that found a number of serious omissions and misstatements in the FISA applications on Page. For example, the FBI failed to disclose that Page had a relationship with the CIA, that the agency had approved Page as an operational contact from 2008 to 2013, that Page notified the agency about his contacts with Russians, and that the CIA had assessed that Page was truthful about describing his contacts.

Exacerbating the omission, an FBI attorney altered an email to say that Page was “not a source.”

Boasberg ordered the FBI and DOJ to include in future applications to the court a statement saying that they contain “all information that might reasonably call into question the accuracy of the information or the reasonableness of any F.B.I. assessment in the application, or otherwise raise doubts about the requested findings.”

On the heels of the release of the OIG report, the FISC issued a scathing order, calling on the FBI to explain what is being done to rectify the malpractice flagged by the inspector general. Boasberg also appointed an independent monitor to assess the FBI’s response. The bureau responded with a menu of procedural, training, and oversight reforms, some of which are already being implemented. Boasberg’s order calls for information and status updates on several of the items.

Boasberg filed his order as lawmakers are considering reforming the FISA act. President Donald Trump told Republican lawmakers in a private meeting on March 3 that he would not sign an extension of the surveillance law without reforms, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told reporters.

In addition to the issues identified in the wiretap applications, some of the key officials involved in the investigation of the Trump campaign were found to have expressed intense bias against Trump and in favor of his 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton. The inspector general found no evidence to suggest that the bias motivated the malpractice.

Follow Ivan on Twitter: @ivanpentchoukov


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 19:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2PRMOOk Tyler Durden

“MILFs In Quarantine” – Coronavirus Porn Sweeps America 

“MILFs In Quarantine” – Coronavirus Porn Sweeps America 

The next big trend in porn is Coronavirus-themed videos. Porn sites across the internet have seen an influx of uploads with amateurs banging in bio hazmat suits and or just simply in masks. 

Over the last month, Pornhub has seen 115 Coronavirus-themed videos uploaded by wannabe porn stars, otherwise known as amateurs. 

There’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for the surge of Coronavirus-themed porn videos, that is, because these amateurs depend on ad revenue to make money, and the only way to survive and generate clicks is to stay super relevant with current events, such as making porn videos about a pandemic that could wipe out the human race. 

One of the oddest videos Vice ran across is titled “Bodycam Footage (CDC Agent) Investigates Deserted Wuhan,” features a first-person point of view of a hospital worker stumbling around in the dark, uncovers a creepy hospital patient, and that’s the moment where we will stop describing what happens next… 

Here’s a PG-rated version of the creepy Coronavirus-themed porn video: 

xHamster spokesperson Alex Hawkin told Vice that Coronavirus-themed porn videos have been surging after it provided free premium accounts to regions affected by the virus. 

Another video Vice viewed is titled “COVID-19 Coronavirus: Horny Slut Has to Use Protection During Outbreak!” where amateur pornstar “Chase Poundher” emerges from the hallway wearing a face mask and tells a female performer entering the house, “Wait, don’t you move a foot closer. Haven’t you heard of COVID-19?” Mr. Poundher then lectures her for one minute about the virus, the outbreak in China, and mask safety. 

“I think people are attracted to COVID-19 themed porn the same way people who are scared of their shadow are attached to horror movies: We are all searching for things that make us come alive,” Mr. Poundher, told Vice. “COVID-19 is something that brings fear and mystery to pretty much everyone in the world right now… You need to be able to feel something, and what better way to make you feel something than the global crisis we are all in right now.”

Other COVID-19 themed porn videos have surfaced on the internet in the last week, including “MILFs in quarantine,” “Face Sitting Corona Virus – No Mask,” and “TSA Agent Detains Woman Suspected of Coronavirus.” 

“We knew that the corona event was ‘good viral material,’ but we also knew it was affecting people in tragic ways,” Mr. Poundher said. “We didn’t want to insult them by making it too real. We personally know people actually stuck in Wuhan and made it with them in mind.” They asked themselves: Would they be offended by this? Or would this take their minds off their situation? “We want the latter.”

The search term “Coronavirus porn” is in a breakout pattern across the US.

Americans are increasingly embracing pandemic doom porn as confirmed cases and deaths surge across the country. Seriously, WTF. 


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 18:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/38x0qoR Tyler Durden

Yet Another Professor Indicted Over Alleged Secret Ties To China

Yet Another Professor Indicted Over Alleged Secret Ties To China

Authored by Wyatt Eichholz via CampusReform.org,

An associate professor and researcher at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville has been arrested for allegedly concealing ties to a Chinese university while receiving federal funding, according to a recent Justice Department press release. 

Amning Hu was charged with three counts of wire fraud and three counts of making false statements following a grand jury indictment for “concealing his affiliation with Beijing University of Technology (BJUT) in China” in order to receive a research grant from NASA.

According to the Justice Department, NASA is prohibited from using federal dollars to collaborate with China or Chinese universities. Hu allegedly made “false representations and omissions to UTK about his affiliation with BJUT caused UTK to falsely certify to NASA that UTK was in compliance with federal law.”

The nature of the particular research at issue is currently unclear. As The Hill reported, the university has since removed from its website information about the professor’s work. The Beijing University of Technology could not be reached for comment. 

The University of Tennessee released the following statement:

“The University of Tennessee has suspended Associate Professor Anming Hu, who was indicted by federal authorities on felony charges. UT officials have cooperated with federal authorities during the investigation. University leadership is fully committed to adherence to grant procedures and the protection of intellectual property.”

U.S. law enforcement officials also took a strong stance.

“The United States Attorney’s Office takes seriously fraudulent conduct that is devised to undermine federally-mandated funding restrictions related to China and Chinese universities,” said U.S. Attorney J. Douglas Overbey for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

 “The University of Tennessee has cooperated with the investigation, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office values the university’s assistance in this matter.”

“Hu allegedly committed fraud by hiding his relationship with a Chinese university while receiving funding from NASA,” said Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers.

“This is just the latest case involving professors or researchers concealing their affiliations with China from their American employers and the U.S. government.  We will not tolerate it.”

ResearchGate profile for Hu stated that his work focused on nanomanufacturing and 3D printing. Hu’s Google Scholar page lists many papers relating to nanoparticles. 

According to the Justice Department press release, Hu faces 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each wire fraud charge and as many as five years in prison for each false statement charge. The case is currently under investigation by the FBI and Inspectors General from NASA and the Department of Energy, along with investigators from the Department of Homeland Security.  

Hu could not be reached for comment in time for publication. 


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 18:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2uZf5eI Tyler Durden

Iran Hawks Pressuring White House To Halt ‘Humanitarian’ Medicine To Iran Amid Outbreak

Iran Hawks Pressuring White House To Halt ‘Humanitarian’ Medicine To Iran Amid Outbreak

An influential US lobbying group tied to Republican hawks is attempting convince the Trump administration to block all medicine sales to Iran after the US Treasury recently opened up humanitarian channels due to Iran’s devastating coronavirus outbreak.

Despite the daily soaring infection rate and death toll, with Iran on Friday confirming 124 deaths amid 4747 confirmed cases — though true numbers are believed much higher — the hawkish pressure group, United Against Nuclear Iran, wants to ensure all medical trade dries up.

Last month the US administration came under fire based on the allegation that aggressive and tightening US-led sanctions of the past two years have actually exacerbated the new Covid-19 crisis in Iran, not only setting the conditions for rapid spread but weakening the medical response for lack of equipment, medicines, and ability to test.

Coronavirus testing in Iran, file image.

However, the White House responded to the criticism by easing sanctions and ensuring humanitarian channels were opened up, specifically to fight the coronavirus, which threatened to spread further through the Middle East.

“The Trump administration is partially reversing course on economic sanctions that have slowed down Iran from importing coronavirus test kits as the country faces down the most deadly COVID-19 outbreak outside of East Asia,” according to a report in The National Interest last month. This included expanding special financial channels for humanitarian goods and medicine to the Islamic Republic.

An investigative report in The Intercept describes United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) and its mounting a well-funded “name and shame” operation targeting medical industry companies still doing business with Iran:

UANI says it aims to persuade “the regime in Tehran to desist from its quest for nuclear weapons, while striving not to punish the Iranian people.” (The U.S. intelligence community does not believe that Iran has any desire or plans to build nuclear weapons.) UANI’s efforts, however, have extended beyond sanctions into pressuring companies that do legal trade with Iran, often under the Treasury Department’s humanitarian exemptions to sanctions — including medical-related trades that would presumably aid in combating a massive public health crisis like this coronavirus outbreak.

The pressure group has ties to John Bolton, the Israeli lobby, as well as Republican Party mega-donors and (surprise, surprise) Saudi Arabia and the UAE

UANI claims its actions continue to be motivated by ensuring Iran cannot pursue over ever acquire a nuclear weapon.

The group is specifically going after companies with humanitarian exemption waivers to conduct limited business with Iran, focused on essential pharmaceutical supplies. The report continues

UANI operates an “Iran Business Registry” that provides an online database of companies it believes are conducting business in or with Iran — a name-and-shame strategy to increase Iran’s economic isolation. The pressure campaign has targeted multiple medical companies with Treasury Department licenses to conduct trade with Iran. Nine pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical-device corporations, all with special licenses, are listed on UANI’s business registry. Companies urged by UANI to “end their Iran business” include BayerMerckPfizerGenzymeAirSepMedradBecton, Dickinson & CompanyEli Lilly, and Abbott Laboratories.

To the surprise of many, the administration last week momentarily put aside the fact that it’s essentially at war with Iran and actually offered to “help” Iran combat the rapidly spreading and deadly coronavirus according to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s prior testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Feb. 28.

But Iran’s foreign ministry slammed America’s offer as “ridiculous” and derided it as propaganda after Washington had already “closed the paths for buying medicine and medical equipment,” according to official statements. As Covid-19 infections continue going global, the blame game is likely only to continue ratcheting up.

Iranian leaders have blamed Washington for the worsening crisis, given the limited ability to import virus testing kits and equipment and medicines. But the State Department under Pompeo has tended to blame countries that have become central to the virus’ spread for deepening the crisis through a severe lack of transparency.  


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 18:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2IpzMn4 Tyler Durden

To Avoid Charges of Price Gouging, eBay Bans Sale of Coronavirus Supplies

Another year, another disaster, another economically misguided tug of war over the merits of “price gouging.” The arrival of COVID-19, otherwise known as coronavirus, ushered in a predictable boost in prices for essential goods, as well as well-intentioned but ill-advised government attempts to cap what businesses can charge for those items. Such measures certainly leave an impact: eBay, for example, responded to that pressure yesterday, announcing that it would leave the market entirely and pull all coronavirus-related supplies from its virtual stores.

“As you may have noted, we are seeing literally small hand sanitizers like this going for as much as $17,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, calling the widespread price increases in the state “unconscionable” and “usurious.” Violators in Newsom’s jurisdiction face up to a $10,000 fine and a year in jail. Sen. Ed Markey (D–Mass.) specifically turned to Amazon: While the company and the suppliers it works with “have a right to expect a reasonable return on the products they sell,” he wrote in a letter to CEO Jeff Bezos, “they do not have a right to impose unjustifiably high prices on consumers who are seeking to protect themselves against the coronavirus.”

The immediate implications are alarming: How can a private business owner be subject to crippling fines (or even imprisonment) for setting his or her own prices? Yet that question misses the full point. It fails to address that prices responding to the market—as they tend to do—is a good thing, even in the face of a deadly pandemic.

Accusations of greed hurdled toward price-gouging business owners are understandable, particularly when people are suffering. But compare that with a world of government-imposed price caps. Those ceilings force businesses to sell in-demand goods at artificially low prices, which fail to signal that said goods are scarce. Absent that marker, supplies are then quickly exhausted, depriving many vulnerable people of the ability to get their hands on any.

Though most critics claim price-gougers are the ones depriving needy people of important goods, that’s rarely true in practice. Consider this hypothetical: Businesses across the state of California (a nod to Newsom) opt to not raise prices on hand sanitizer, greatly increasing the likelihood that a small cohort of people concerned about coronavirus will buy a large share of the item in bulk. Since there is a limited supply of hand sanitizer in the marketplace, the immobile elderly woman next door who hadn’t yet made her assisted sojourn to CVS is basically out of luck. And, in this case, she is more at risk of succumbing to the disease, should she contract it.

Perhaps worst of all, regulatory restrictions on pricing can, in some cases, force third-party sellers to exit the market entirely, as seen with eBay. Though it sounds like a doomsday scenario, it’s exactly what the retail giant chose to do yesterday when it began pulling all surgical face masks, hand sanitizers, and disinfectant wipes, opting not to go head-to-head with the 34 states that have strict price-gouging regulations. While the consequences vary across the U.S., the liabilities clearly outweighed the risk of selling vital goods. 

“We will continue to monitor the evolving situation and quickly remove any listing that mentions COVID-19, coronavirus, 2019nCoV (except books) in the title or description,” the company wrote in a blog post. “These listings may violate applicable US laws or regulations, eBay policies, and exhibit unfair pricing behavior for our buyers.”

This is quite literally why we can’t have nice things.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2PToT18
via IFTTT

Coronavirus To Boost Gold Price

Coronavirus To Boost Gold Price

Written by Jan Nieuwenhuijs for Voima Insight.

As the coronavirus is spreading around the world, its ramifications on the economy will boost the price of gold.

The coronavirus is swallowing the world. What started in January as a local issue in Wuhan, China, is now a global problem. Although there remains uncertainty around the health hazards of the virus, its impact on the world economy is clear. Early on, we witnessed large segments of the Chinese economy grinding to a halt and supply chains collapsing. As the virus is spreading, major economies will likely suffer the same fate as the Chinese. Across the globe, schools and companies are closed. Events are canceled, and traveling is brought to a minimum. People that can work from home are asked to do so.

Government officials are taking precautions as well and for a good reason. In Iran, 23 Members of Parliament have been infected, and one of Ayatollah Khamenei’s top advisers died of the virus. On Wednesday, the first case of corona in an EU institution was confirmed.

The European Central Bank called off a meeting on Tuesday out of fear for contamination, and the International Monetary Fund decided to change the spring meetings to a virtual format (video conference). In France, President Macron ordered to confiscate all stockpiles of face masks and to nationalize production, just before the news came out by the World Health Organization, that “the mortality rate for COVID-19 [coronavirus] is 3.4% …, higher than previous estimates of about 2%.”

My concern is that the virus has set in motion a domino effect in a brittle world economy. After the Great Financial Crisis, central banks have over-stimulated the economy through quantitative easing (“printing money”) and extremely low interest rates. Unconventional monetary policy has spawned asset bubbles, zombie companies and banks, decreased productivity growth, and global debt to GDP is at a historical high of 322%. Although unconventional monetary policy has worked counterproductive, any subsequent economic downturns will make central banks double down on their previous policy: more stimulus.

The first macroeconomic indicators coming in from China are disastrous. The headline Caixin Business Activity Index fell over 25 index points from 51.8 in January to 26.5 in February.

Courtesy Caixin.

The economic shock made Chinese banks—which were already suffering from non-performing loans (NPLs) on their balance sheet before the virus erupted—to take extraordinary measures in not recognizing bad loans, with the explicit approval of regulators in Beijing. More from Bloomberg:

Some of the measures, … include rolling over loans to companies at risk of missing payment deadlines and relaxing guidelines on how to categorize overdue debt 

lenders are also … allowing borrowers to skip interest payments for as long as six months

The four biggest state-owned banks are trading at an average 0.5 times their estimated book value for this year, near a record low.

Courtesy Bloomberg.

These are signs of a double-edged problem: companies aren’t making ends meet and banks face insolvency.

The value at which banking stocks are traded relative to their book value is called the “price to book ratio.” As stated by Bloomberg, this ratio is near a record low for Chinese banks (at an average of 0.5). If we simplify the price to book ratio, then it can be said to reveal how the market values a bank’s balance sheet, versus how the bank itself values its balance sheet. When the price to book ratio is below 1 (alternatively below 100%) the market thinks the bank is in bad shape. If the ratio is 0.5, the market thinks the bank is in very bad shape.

European banks are in no better condition. A few months ago, Dutch independent journalist Arno Wellens computed the price to book ratio for Europe’s largest banks. Some banks appeared to be healthy—mainly the ones in countries that are not in the eurozone. But many other Systemically Important Banks, such as Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Société Générale, UniCredit, Banco Popolare, Banca Monte dei Paschi, and Banco Santander have price to book ratios far below 100%. Insiders know these banks are not healthy (no matter what stress test they pass).

Courtesy Arno Wellens.

The coronavirus will cause the economy in Europe to suffer a significant setback (as in China). It will hurt businesses and, in my view, will push the economy into a recession. On Wednesday, European Union officials publicly stated they are “starting the internal reflection” on their methodology for dealing with failing banks. Banks, once again, will face bankruptcy.

Why Gold Will Rise

Gold has been a safe haven for thousands of years. And still, when economies contract, stock markets plummet, and banks fail, gold offers the best protection, as it’s the only financial asset that is no one’s liability. Gold has no counterparty risk and can’t be printed.

Other traditional safe havens are sovereign bonds. In the past years, the gold price in U.S. dollars has been correlated with long term real interest rates. Whenever real interest rates decline, the gold price rises. Real interest rates are calculated by subtracting inflation from, in this case, the nominal interest rate on a 10-year U.S. sovereign bond (UST). On Tuesday, the nominal interest rate on a 10-year UST fell below 1% for the first time ever. I expect nominal rates in the U.S. to further decline (possibly to enter negative territory, as in Europe and Japan). This would be bullish for the price of gold.

The decline in UST yields came after the Federal Reserve cut its baseline interest rate on Tuesday by 0.5% in an attempt to calm markets. Last week the U.S. stock market experienced its fastest correction in history.

Investors are in the process of running down Exter’s inverse pyramid: selling stocks, buying government bonds, and to a certain extent, gold.

I say to a certain extent, as currently gold makes up a small fraction of all financial assets. When I asked Jeffrey Christian from CPM Group how much he estimates gold now represents, he replied over email:

Gold accounted for 0.52% of global financial assets in 2019, up from 0.51% in 2018.

In my view, this means there is still much more upside for gold.

Conclusion

Although I think gold has a lot more upside, it can be a bumpy road. When the economy contracts, deflationary forces can hold back gold. Central banks will not tolerate deflation, though, certainly not with sky-high debt to GDP levels. Deflation causes nominal income to decline, which makes debt unserviceable. This would trigger a chain reaction of defaults. Central banks stand ready to avoid this scenario and will continue to pursue inflation to alleviate the debt burden.

When the economy contracts, or deflation looms, I wouldn’t be surprised if central banks either hand out cash financed by new money creation (helicopter money) or directly devalue their currencies against gold as they did in the 1930s. Both scenarios could significantly increase the price of gold.

Stay up to date, subscribe to Voima Insight—click here


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 17:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3ayZYrt Tyler Durden

To Avoid Charges of Price Gouging, eBay Bans Sale of Coronavirus Supplies

Another year, another disaster, another economically misguided tug of war over the merits of “price gouging.” The arrival of COVID-19, otherwise known as coronavirus, ushered in a predictable boost in prices for essential goods, as well as well-intentioned but ill-advised government attempts to cap what businesses can charge for those items. Such measures certainly leave an impact: eBay, for example, responded to that pressure yesterday, announcing that it would leave the market entirely and pull all coronavirus-related supplies from its virtual stores.

“As you may have noted, we are seeing literally small hand sanitizers like this going for as much as $17,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, calling the widespread price increases in the state “unconscionable” and “usurious.” Violators in Newsom’s jurisdiction face up to a $10,000 fine and a year in jail. Sen. Ed Markey (D–Mass.) specifically turned to Amazon: While the company and the suppliers it works with “have a right to expect a reasonable return on the products they sell,” he wrote in a letter to CEO Jeff Bezos, “they do not have a right to impose unjustifiably high prices on consumers who are seeking to protect themselves against the coronavirus.”

The immediate implications are alarming: How can a private business owner be subject to crippling fines (or even imprisonment) for setting his or her own prices? Yet that question misses the full point. It fails to address that prices responding to the market—as they tend to do—is a good thing, even in the face of a deadly pandemic.

Accusations of greed hurdled toward price-gouging business owners are understandable, particularly when people are suffering. But compare that with a world of government-imposed price caps. Those ceilings force businesses to sell in-demand goods at artificially low prices, which fail to signal that said goods are scarce. Absent that marker, supplies are then quickly exhausted, depriving many vulnerable people of the ability to get their hands on any.

Though most critics claim price-gougers are the ones depriving needy people of important goods, that’s rarely true in practice. Consider this hypothetical: Businesses across the state of California (a nod to Newsom) opt to not raise prices on hand sanitizer, greatly increasing the likelihood that a small cohort of people concerned about coronavirus will buy a large share of the item in bulk. Since there is a limited supply of hand sanitizer in the marketplace, the immobile elderly woman next door who hadn’t yet made her assisted sojourn to CVS is basically out of luck. And, in this case, she is more at risk of succumbing to the disease, should she contract it.

Perhaps worst of all, regulatory restrictions on pricing can, in some cases, force third-party sellers to exit the market entirely, as seen with eBay. Though it sounds like a doomsday scenario, it’s exactly what the retail giant chose to do yesterday when it began pulling all surgical face masks, hand sanitizers, and disinfectant wipes, opting not to go head-to-head with the 34 states that have strict price-gouging regulations. While the consequences vary across the U.S., the liabilities clearly outweighed the risk of selling vital goods. 

“We will continue to monitor the evolving situation and quickly remove any listing that mentions COVID-19, coronavirus, 2019nCoV (except books) in the title or description,” the company wrote in a blog post. “These listings may violate applicable US laws or regulations, eBay policies, and exhibit unfair pricing behavior for our buyers.”

This is quite literally why we can’t have nice things.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2PToT18
via IFTTT

NIMBY Seattle-Area Residents Resist Coronavirus Quarantine Plan For Local Motel

NIMBY Seattle-Area Residents Resist Coronavirus Quarantine Plan For Local Motel

Seattle residents are pushing back against officials in King County, Washington, who plan to use emergency powers to buy and renovate an Econo Lodge located south of the city to house coronavirus patients, according to Bloomberg.

The mayor of Kent, Washington – a Seattle suburb near the airport where the 85-bed motel is located, was livid over the plan. While local workers and residents are staunchly opposed as well.

We’re one of the largest cities in the county, and we know we have a role to play in preventing the spread of the virus,” said Kent Mayor Dana Ralph in a phone interview. “But we were not included in the conversation or decision making.”

This type of consternation is common when a community pushes back against an unwanted project — inspiring the term Nimby for “not in my backyard.” This time, the backlash comes as health officials try to contain a spreading public health crisis, revealing a challenge that many communities across the U.S. may face as they try to slow the outbreak.

“Washington state counties are not the only places where that is going to be discussed,” said Irwin Redlener, a disaster preparedness expert and public health professor at Columbia University in New York. “We might have to adopt procedures and protocols that would be unacceptable in the absence of a true national emergency. In other words, our standards might have to get much more lax.” –Bloomberg

Residents of Kent aren’t the only ones resisting quarantine plans. Last month, federal officials were forced to scrap a plan to house coronavirus evacuees from a cruise ship to a FEMA facility in Anniston, Alabama, after locals and the city council opposed the move.

In Orange County, California, residents are also up in arms over a proposal to place some patients in a state-owned facility.

The Econo Lodge plan would include $4 million for the purchase of the motel and an additional $1.5 million in emergency funds to renovate it, as well as hire as many as 11 existing employees to run the facility. It would be used to house coronavirus patients who are infected but not seriously ill, as part of an effort to keep hospital beds available for those who need them, according to Bloomberg. According to county officials, it was the only property on the market that met their criteria of separate heating and cooling systems for each room, and doors which open to the outside, rather than a hallway.

“From that perspective, a motel is a very good solution,” said NYU School of Public Health professor David Abramson. “They’re almost entirely private spaces.”

On Thursday morning, cars raced by on the highway behind the motel, where a room with a single bed was going for $78.68 a night. Trucks were parked at the edge of the property, which sits near a Denny’s, a bowling alley and a Ford dealership.

Inside, confusion and anger reigned. The front-desk worker at the motel, who asked to not be identified by name, said that she had learned about the plan to quarantine coronavirus patients from news reports and was strongly opposed. She had yet to hear from her manager whether she would still have a job. And, even if she did, she wasn’t sure she wanted it for fear of infecting her family. –Bloomberg

Without interference, the facility could open within two weeks. According to the report, King County officials are also looking at other quarantine locations, including in Seattle.

That is, if the locals don’t stand in the way.

“I’m sorry for the people who are going through this,” said 35-year-old Rupali Handa, who said that officials should quarantine people “somewhere else.”


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 17:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3cEZQZh Tyler Durden

Utah School Forbids Kids From Saying “No” If Asked To Dance… & Other Absurdity

Utah School Forbids Kids From Saying “No” If Asked To Dance… & Other Absurdity

Authored by Simon Black via SovereignMan.com,

Are you ready for this week’s absurdity? Here’s our Friday roll-up of the most ridiculous stories from around the world that are threats to your liberty, your finances, and your prosperity… and on occasion, poetic justice.

*  *  *

Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal Just Rose From the Dead

Ignorance of the law is no excuse for you or me.

But somehow when Hillary Clinton broke the law while Secretary of State, it was her intentions that mattered.

As everyone knows by now, Clinton stored confidential, top secret emails on a personal, unsecured email server while she was Secretary of State.

She got off the hook because she claimed that she didn’t intend to violate the law… she didn’t realize that what she was doing was totally illegal.

That’s why she’s not rotting in a prison cell, even though you or I would be turning big rocks into little rocks in a DayGlo Orange jumpsuit if we had committed an equivalent crime.

But a group called Judicial Watch wasn’t as quick to let it go.

Using Freedom of Information Act requests, they continued to uncover more and more details of the case and bringing it all to court. And as the judge in the case commented, “With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers.”

Therefore a federal judge has permitted another round of discovery. This means Hillary Clinton will be forced to sit for an interview with government officials to answer “significant questions” about her violation of the law.

Click here to read the full story.

*  *  *

Police in Scotland have a list of people who tell offensive jokes

Scottish Internet users better be careful of the jokes they tell online– you might end up on a government watchlist.

A Freedom of Information request revealed that 3,300 “non-crime hate incidents” have been logged in a police database.

Hundreds of people were added to the list last year for making offensive jokes or rude comments online.

Police say they track these individuals just in case their humor crosses the line into illegal territory.

For example, a couple years ago a Scottish YouTuber was arrested and convicted for teaching his pug a Nazi salute.

They guy may have been way too sophomoric… but when did it become a crime to be immature and offensive?

And now free speech is being monitored for signs of criminality.

Plus, with certain types of background checks, potential employers could see that these innocent people have been logged social media posts deemed to be offensive by the government.

Click here to read the full story.

*  *  *

School forbade kids from saying no when asked to dance

I just love it when wokeness contradicts itself.

A middle school in Utah was gearing up to host its Valentine’s Day dance. And in an effort to make sure that all students felt “welcome, comfortable, safe, and included,” the school adopted a policy forcing the kids to dance with anyone who asked them.

And sure enough, when an 11-year old girl was asked to dance by a boy who creeped her out, the principal forced them to dance together.

This is pretty much the opposite of #MeToo.

And in their ridiculous effort to make sure that no student was upset or offended, they violated one of the most basic consent rules in our society.

This is the paradox of wokeness: it’s absolutely impossible to prevent people from feeling upset, offended, excluded, or rejected.

Click here to read the full story.

*  *  *

Update: not illegal to remove cops’ GPS from your car

In December we talked about police who suspected a man of selling drugs.

They placed a GPS tracker on his car, but the man removed it. So the police got a warrant to search the man’s property for the “stolen” GPS.

While searching for the GPS, they found drugs.

Now the case against him for theft of the GPS has been dismissed along with the evidence of drug crimes.

The courts said it was all collected illegally, because the GPS was never stolen in the first place.

Click here to read the full story.

*  *  *

Update: woman pleads guilty to being topless in her own home

We’ve been following the case of Tilli Buchanan who was charged with sex crimes for being topless in her own home.

She and her husband had removed their shirts after installing insulation. Because her step-children saw her barechested, Tilli was charged with “child sex abuse” under Utah criminal code 76-9-702.5(2)(a)(ii)(B) for exposing “the female breast below the top of the areola. . .”

That left her facing the possibility of having to register as a child sex offender.

Originally she tried to challenge the law itself under equal protection grounds, since it treated male and female nipples differently.

But when she lost that case, she opted to take a plea deal. The charges were downgraded so she won’t be considered a sex offender.

Tilli will pay $600 and the case will be dismissed in a year if she doesn’t commit any crimes.

It’s pretty pathetic that she was ever charged in the first place, and sad that this is what the justice system wastes resources on.

Click here to read the full story.

*  *  *

And to continue learning how to ensure you thrive no matter what happens next in the world, I encourage you to download our free Perfect Plan B Guide.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/06/2020 – 17:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/337WQRb Tyler Durden