Watch Live: Powell Addresses Room Full Of Economists As October Rate-Cut Odds Soar

Watch Live: Powell Addresses Room Full Of Economists As October Rate-Cut Odds Soar

For the first time since a slew of economic data released over the past week helped ratchet up odds for another Fed rate cut in October, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will speak Tuesday at the National Association for Business Economics’ annual meeting in Denver.

Just before Powell speaks, the odds of a rate cut in October hovered just over 75%.

Source: Bloomberg

If Powell is truly data-dependent and seeking insurance for the trade deal, then recent events suggest he will be more dovish than hawkish…

Source: Bloomberg

As macro data surprises begin to disappoint serially…

Source: Bloomberg

Following Powell’s prepared remarks, there will be a brief Q&A. Powell is expected to begin speaking at around 2:30 PM ET.

Watch live below (Powell’s prepared remarks are due to start at 1430ET):

Grab your popcorn.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/08/2019 – 14:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/33ohDPl Tyler Durden

Musk Admits To Being “F*cking Idiot” Over Baseless Pedo Accusations

Musk Admits To Being “F*cking Idiot” Over Baseless Pedo Accusations

On Monday, the legal battle between Elon Musk and Vern Unsworth, the British cave diver that Musk erroneously called a “pedo” and “child rapist” to his 20+ million Twitter followers and a BuzzFeed reporter, continued. Unsworth filed his opposition to Musk’s motion for summary judgement in the case and the filing was chock full of highlights.

Unsworth’s opposition argues that Elon Musk knowingly defamed him and orchestrated “a malicious, false, and anonymous leak campaign in the UK and Australian press”.

Unsworth also argued that Musk’s statements were “replete with untruths and misrepresentations,” according to BuzzFeed news.

After the table of contents, which does a pretty good job of summarizing the ridiculous story thus far, Buzzfeed reporter Ryan Mac points out that Unsworth’s attorney got a hold of Musk’s emails – including one email on September 4, 2018 to a public relations consultant named Juleanna Glover, where Musk refers to himself as a “fucking idiot” for emailing a reporter unverified information. 

“It was still one of the dumbest things I’ve ever done,” Musk also says.

Unsworth’s lawyers argued that Musk knew that his allegations were false but defamed him anyway: 

“On August 24, 27, and 30, Musk received separate written reports stating that Unsworth met [his partner] when she was at least 18 or 19 years old (and married her some years after that) – but less than 8 hours after getting the last such report, Musk nonetheless told the BuzzFeed reporter that Unsworth is a child rapist who married a 12-year-old child bride.” 

The legal filing also makes the astonishing claim that the head of Musk’s family office, Jared Birchall, encouraged unproven information dug up by a private investigator (who was later found to be a felon) to be leaked to the U.K. press. 

Meanwhile, turning to the rescue itself, proof continues to surface that Musk is more concerned with his own image and PR than he ever was in actually helping the cause.

Unsworth’s filing points out that Musk spent an inordinate amount of time trying to get the Thai prime minister involved in walking back critical statements made by the Thai regional government about Musk’s proposed solution.

The filing reads:

“On July 10th, before the Boys were all rescued, Musk and members of his team that were supposed to be engaged in developing the Tube were instead enlisting the Thai government (including the Thai Prime Minister) to publicly reverse a statement by the Thai regional governor’s statement that the Tube was not practical and did not fit the mission.”

“I can see how this would look like a ‘narcissistic PR stunt,’” Musk conceded during discovery.

Yeah, Elon, we agree. Maybe it’s time to cut Unsworth his check so you can get back to “innovating”.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/08/2019 – 14:06

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Iza8gm Tyler Durden

Graham Gives Giuliani Senate Platform To Lay Out Biden-Ukraine Corruption Case

Graham Gives Giuliani Senate Platform To Lay Out Biden-Ukraine Corruption Case

While House Democrats gear up for kangaroo-court impeachment proceedings triggered by a whistleblower complaint over President Trump’s communications with Ukraine, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has invited Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani to explain allegations of rampant corruption against former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter in Ukraine. 

Joe Biden infamously bragged on tape last year about abusing his position as Vice President to force Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas company which was paying Hunter Biden $600,000 to sit on its board. 

Democrats have gone to great lengths to avoid addressing this – and have instead launched impeachment proceedings after a CIA employee approached the House Intelligence Committee chaired Adam Schiff (D-CA), lawyered up with Democrat operatives, and then filed a whistleblower complaint using second-hand information on a recently changed form – the previous version of which explicitly prohibited anything but first-hand info.

The whistleblower and concurrent media reports claimed that President Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, however in a surprise move the White House released both a transcript of the call proving there was no pressure or quid pro quo. A release of the whistleblower complaint suggested it was written by a legal team, and several of its claims were proven false by the transcript. 

On Tuesday, Graham tweeted: “Have heard on numerous occasions disturbing allegations by @RudyGiuliani about corruption in Ukraine and the many improprieties surrounding the firing of former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin,” adding “Given the House of Representatives’ behavior, it is time for the Senate to inquire about corruption and other improprieties involving Ukraine.” 

“Therefore I will offer to Mr. Giuliani the opportunity to come before the Senate Judiciary Committee to inform the committee of his concerns,” Graham concluded.  

In addition to allegations of malfeasance and profiteering by the Bidens, Giuliani is also looking into Democratic efforts to meddle in the 2016 US election in favor of Hillary Clinton.  In December of 2018, a Ukrainian court ruled thatUkraine’s Ukraine’s Director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), Artem Sytnyk “acted illegally” when he revealed the existence of Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort’s name in a “black ledger” containing off-book payments to Manafort by Ukraine’s previous administration. 

While the ruling against Sytnyk and Leshchenko was later overturned on a technicality, The Blaze obtained and translated recording of Sytnyk bragging about helping Clinton in the 2016 US election

In response to Graham’s offer, Giuliani told CNN “Love Lindsey, but I am still a lawyer and I will have to deal with privilege,” although “Given the nature of his invitation about my concerns I might be able to do it without discussing privileged information.” 

If and when Giuliani shows up, Kamala Harris appears ready to go full attack dog – with theatrics which haven’t been witnessed since last October’s anti-Kavanaugh performance. 


Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/08/2019 – 13:46

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2MsvjSg Tyler Durden

Trump’s Nearly $1 Trillion Deficit Is Worse Than a Broken Promise

One of the refrains from President Trump’s most ardent defenders—as well as from the president himself—is that he keeps his promises. For the last several years, the Republican National Committee, which serves as a de facto arm of the president’s political operation, has been touting “promises made, promises kept,” a phrase that the president has repeated at campaign stops and rallies. The website PromisesKept.com is operated by Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. 

The idea behind the slogan is to combat the idea that Trump has few policy accomplishments, and to portray the president as someone who can be relied on to follow through on his campaign promises. He’s a president you can count on. 

Yet when it comes to the federal debt, Trump is clearly failing to live up to his own words. In April 2016, Trump told The Washington Post, “We’ve got to get rid of the $19 trillion debt.” And he believed he could make that happen in a relatively compressed time frame. “I think I could do it fairly quickly,” he said. How quickly? “I would say over a period of eight years.” 

Nearly three years into his presidency, however, the debt has risen to surpass $22 trillion. And federal budget deficits—the annual gap between revenues and spending—are growing ever larger, hitting levels not seen since the aftermath of the recession during President Obama’s first term. 

According to a new estimate from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the federal budget deficit for the 2019 fiscal year, which ended last month, was about $984 billion dollars. That just-shy-of-a-trillion dollar figure is higher than projected, and represents an increase of about 50 percent from when Trump took office, and an increase of about $200 billion from last year alone. It’s more than double the $442 billion deficit under Obama in 2015. 

In the macro, political-difference-making scheme of the universe, it is almost certainly futile to dwell on the question of how Republicans would have reacted to such debt-and-deficit totals under President Obama, and yet: Imagine how Republicans would have reacted to such debt-and-deficit totals under Obama.

Actually, we don’t have to imagine. We know. Because Republicans warned, loudly and repeatedly, that Obama’s deficits, which came in the aftermath of a nationwide economic slowdown, were apocalyptic, catastrophic, world ending, and so on and so forth. 

Yet here we are. Trump is president, and he has allowed the deficit to soar beyond the increases that were already projected to happen. And Republicans in Congress have reacted with muted concern at best, and more like a collective shrug. Trillion-dollar deficits under a Democrat were a national emergency. Trillion-dollar deficits under Trump are no biggie. It’s almost like the real problem, for many Republicans, wasn’t the deficit. 

Republicans in Congress, who manage the budget process and who have signed on to various deals that spend more on domestic spending (a Democratic priority) in order to secure more spending on defense spending (a Republican priority), are, of course, a big part of the problem. A president cannot unilaterally address the annual budget deficit without significant help from the legislature.

But part of the problem is that Trump, being Trump, thought he could. In the 2016 interview where he raised the possibility of eliminating federal debt in eight years, he said he could do it through altering foreign trade deals. “The power is trade,” he said. “Our deals are so bad.” Trump said he would renegotiate trade deals with China, in particular, suggesting that doing so would eliminate federal debt. 

In many ways, that was the most telling part of Trump’s response. He appears to have confused the foreign trade deficit with the federal budget deficit, a confusion that he has stubbornly held onto throughout his time as president. In the meantime, both the budget deficit and the trade deficit have increased. Trump has failed on both measures. And, as with his confusion about the budget deficit, his trade agenda has been driven by false claims and deep misconceptions about how trade works. 

Trump’s nearly trillion-dollar deficits help reveal a deeper problem with the president, one that simple arguments about promises kept or unkept can sometimes fail to capture. It’s not just that Trump can’t be counted on to live up to his word. It’s that Trump can’t even be counted on to comprehend the promises he’s made.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2ItvMCH
via IFTTT

Trump’s Nearly $1 Trillion Deficit Is Worse Than a Broken Promise

One of the refrains from President Trump’s most ardent defenders—as well as from the president himself—is that he keeps his promises. For the last several years, the Republican National Committee, which serves as a de facto arm of the president’s political operation, has been touting “promises made, promises kept,” a phrase that the president has repeated at campaign stops and rallies. The website PromisesKept.com is operated by Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. 

The idea behind the slogan is to combat the idea that Trump has few policy accomplishments, and to portray the president as someone who can be relied on to follow through on his campaign promises. He’s a president you can count on. 

Yet when it comes to the federal debt, Trump is clearly failing to live up to his own words. In April 2016, Trump told The Washington Post, “We’ve got to get rid of the $19 trillion debt.” And he believed he could make that happen in a relatively compressed time frame. “I think I could do it fairly quickly,” he said. How quickly? “I would say over a period of eight years.” 

Nearly three years into his presidency, however, the debt has risen to surpass $22 trillion. And federal budget deficits—the annual gap between revenues and spending—are growing ever larger, hitting levels not seen since the aftermath of the recession during President Obama’s first term. 

According to a new estimate from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the federal budget deficit for the 2019 fiscal year, which ended last month, was about $984 billion dollars. That just-shy-of-a-trillion dollar figure is higher than projected, and represents an increase of about 50 percent from when Trump took office, and an increase of about $200 billion from last year alone. It’s more than double the $442 billion deficit under Obama in 2015. 

In the macro, political-difference-making scheme of the universe, it is almost certainly futile to dwell on the question of how Republicans would have reacted to such debt-and-deficit totals under President Obama, and yet: Imagine how Republicans would have reacted to such debt-and-deficit totals under Obama.

Actually, we don’t have to imagine. We know. Because Republicans warned, loudly and repeatedly, that Obama’s deficits, which came in the aftermath of a nationwide economic slowdown, were apocalyptic, catastrophic, world ending, and so on and so forth. 

Yet here we are. Trump is president, and he has allowed the deficit to soar beyond the increases that were already projected to happen. And Republicans in Congress have reacted with muted concern at best, and more like a collective shrug. Trillion-dollar deficits under a Democrat were a national emergency. Trillion-dollar deficits under Trump are no biggie. It’s almost like the real problem, for many Republicans, wasn’t the deficit. 

Republicans in Congress, who manage the budget process and who have signed on to various deals that spend more on domestic spending (a Democratic priority) in order to secure more spending on defense spending (a Republican priority), are, of course, a big part of the problem. A president cannot unilaterally address the annual budget deficit without significant help from the legislature.

But part of the problem is that Trump, being Trump, thought he could. In the 2016 interview where he raised the possibility of eliminating federal debt in eight years, he said he could do it through altering foreign trade deals. “The power is trade,” he said. “Our deals are so bad.” Trump said he would renegotiate trade deals with China, in particular, suggesting that doing so would eliminate federal debt. 

In many ways, that was the most telling part of Trump’s response. He appears to have confused the foreign trade deficit with the federal budget deficit, a confusion that he has stubbornly held onto throughout his time as president. In the meantime, both the budget deficit and the trade deficit have increased. Trump has failed on both measures. And, as with his confusion about the budget deficit, his trade agenda has been driven by false claims and deep misconceptions about how trade works. 

Trump’s nearly trillion-dollar deficits help reveal a deeper problem with the president, one that simple arguments about promises kept or unkept can sometimes fail to capture. It’s not just that Trump can’t be counted on to live up to his word. It’s that Trump can’t even be counted on to comprehend the promises he’s made.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2ItvMCH
via IFTTT

Admin Officials Already Trying To Walk Back Trump’s Syria ‘Withdrawal’

Admin Officials Already Trying To Walk Back Trump’s Syria ‘Withdrawal’

In what’s beginning to look like an exact repeat of April 2018, when Trump previously declared it was time to “bring the troops home” from Syria but severe push back from the generals and his own administration resulted in the opposite happening, a senior official has walked back some of the president’s statements regarding the new US draw down in northeast Syria

In a call with reporters late Monday, following a prior Trump tweet declaring “It is time for us to get out of these ridiculous Endless Wars, many of them tribal, and bring our soldiers home,” a senior administration official told reporters “the U.S. is not removing its forces from Syria in the face of a Turkish incursion.” It appears the Pentagon is merely ready to reposition forces within the country, withdrawing from some key northern border posts

Rather, the president ordered roughly 50 special operations troops in northern Syria to relocate to a different part of the country after he learned that Turkey has planned an offensive against U.S.-backed Kurdish forces in Syria. The official said that offensive had not yet begun.

US forces at Tanf base along the Syrian-Iraqi border, via Wiki Commons.

The report continues, based on the new statement issued on condition of anonymity, saying: “The latest assertion, however, appears to conflict with a flurry of tweets the president issued Monday, further explaining a White House statement late Sunday that first announced the withdrawal, but offered few details.”

A hasty US withdrawal from border observation posts such as at Tel Abyad and Ras al Ain in northeast Syria appears to have already happened.

Officially there’s still as many as 1,000 American troops occupying Syrian, in support of Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who’ve said they were “betrayed” by the White House’s late Sunday statement, which said Turkey will move forward with a military incursion into Northern Syria and that American troops “will no longer be in the immediate area”. 

Pentagon officials and reports have claimed the defense department was “blindsided” by the administration’s withdrawal declaration. 

Indeed it does appear that some top administration officials were confused by the new policy, as evidenced in a now deleted tweet by Secretary of Defense Mark Esper

Esper had stated the US “does not endorse a Turkish operation in Northern Syria,” and further called any such move “destablizing” and that it would bring “consequences”. Likely the statement was premature, and Esper and deleted it in order to await and confirm the official policy, which may still be somewhat up in the air.  

Uncertainty over the Pentagon’s ultimate direction and goal in Syria could remain all the way into next month, given Turkey’s President Erdogan and President Trump are set to discuss the matter of the so-called Turkish ‘safe zone’ in face-to-face talks in Washington.

Meanwhile, both sides of the aisle, including the military and intelligence ‘deep state’ are no doubt already mounting fierce push back. 


Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/08/2019 – 13:25

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/30VQilG Tyler Durden

Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! The October Term 2020 of FantasySCOTUS is now in session

I am honored to open up the 10th Season of FantasySCOTUS. I launched the site back in 2009 when I was still clerking. Now, a decade later, thousands of Court Watchers have made their predictions. Sign up today at FantasySCOTUS.net to predict the outcome of all the cases this term, including the three Title VII cases: Bostock, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, and Zarda.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2MnKDjh
via IFTTT

$38 Billion In 3Y Treasuries Sell At Lowest Yield Since Nov 2016

$38 Billion In 3Y Treasuries Sell At Lowest Yield Since Nov 2016

A new week of coupon auctions has started with the Treasury selling $38 billion in 3Y paper stopping out at a high yield of 1.4130%, which while tailing the When Issued 1.409% by 0.4bps, was the lowest 3Y yield since November 2016 and below last month’s 1.573% as short end yields have resumed collapsing amid a surge in rate cut expectations.

The Bid to Cover was virtually unchanged for 4 auctions in a row, rising tom 2.43 from 2.42 in September (and 2.39 and 2.41 in July and August respectively). The internals also showed virtually no change from last month, with Indirects taking down 45.8%, down from 46.2% last month, and just below the 46.4% six auction average, and with Directs also almost unchanged at 16.9% (up from 16.6%), it meant Dealers were left holding an almost identical amount to last month, at 37.3%.

Overall, a solid if not stellar auction, one which had no impact on the yield curve, with the 10Y last trading at 1.5374%, up modestly from session lows of 1.51%.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/08/2019 – 13:12

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2AVWOOV Tyler Durden

Trudeau Rumored To Be In Talks To Suppress Potentially Career-Ending Sex Scandal

Trudeau Rumored To Be In Talks To Suppress Potentially Career-Ending Sex Scandal

Somehow, the Liberal Party has managed to minimize the blowback from Justin Trudeau’s ‘blackface’ scandal, and with two weeks to go until election day, is still well within the margin of error in most polls.

But there might be another scandal in the works. According to a report in the Buffalo Chronicle, the party is doing everything in its power to suppress a sex scandal involving Trudeau and the daughter of a wealthy Canadian businessman who Trudeau reportedly may have become involved with when she was a student at West Point Grey Academy, a prestigious private school where Trudeau worked as a substitute teacher in his 20s.

The Chronicle’s sources claim that political observers had been anticipating an expose in Saturday’s Globe and Mail. However, it appears Trudeau and his people have gotten to the woman, and are in the process of negotiating an NDA. The woman is being represented by counsel, and is reportedly being offered monetary compensation.

Trudeau worked as a substitute teacher at the private school from 1999 until an abrupt departure in June 2001. It has long been rumored that Trudeau had improper relations with female students while working at the school, though nothing has ever been substantiated.

The prime minister was briefly embroiled in a sexual harassment scandal after being accused of “groping” a reporter back in 2000. Trudeau swiftly acknowledged that he was wrong and apologized for groping the reporter.

But a sex scandal involving a potentially underage student would likely end his political career.


Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/08/2019 – 13:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/31Webec Tyler Durden

Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! The October Term 2020 of FantasySCOTUS is now in session

I am honored to open up the 10th Season of FantasySCOTUS. I launched the site back in 2009 when I was still clerking. Now, a decade later, thousands of Court Watchers have made their predictions. Sign up today at FantasySCOTUS.net to predict the outcome of all the cases this term, including the three Title VII cases: Bostock, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, and Zarda.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2MnKDjh
via IFTTT