Watch Live: Powell’s First Congressional Testimony – Inflation, Rate Hikes, Volatility And More

In his first testimony before Congress as chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell will deliver his prepared remarks – which were released at 8:30 am ET – before spending a couple hours taking questions from members of the House Financial Services committee on Tuesday, a group that has, historically, been somewhat hostile to Powell’s predecessor.

Amid a flurry of disappointing economic data released this morning, Powell delivered a sanguine prepared statement, arguing that “many of the headwinds facing the US economy have turned into tailwinds” while reiterating his conviction that the “economy remains strong.” Markets broadly exhibited a hawkish kneejerk reaction to this.

Powell

In regards to the all-important question of inflation, Powell said “we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term.”

Powell also sounded optimistic about the market wobbles in February, saying “at this point, we don’t see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation.”

Clues about the Fed’s rate-hike trajectory (are four rate hikes a strong possibility? Or will the Fed adhere to its latest batch of projections, which call for three hikes?) will be of paramount importance to investors as lawmakers pepper Powell with questions about monetary policy and the Fed’s regualtory role.

According to CNNMoney, expect Powell to answer some questions about the US budget deficit. Congress recently added to the deficit with two bills: a $1.5 trillion tax cut and a $300 billion spending bill.

Watch Powell’s testimony live below:

And here’s the full text of his prepared statement:

Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

Chairman Jerome H. Powell

Chairman Hensarling, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.

On the occasion of my first appearance before this Committee as Chairman of the Federal Reserve, I want to express my appreciation for my predecessor, Chair Janet Yellen, and her important contributions. During her term as Chair, the economy continued to strengthen and Federal Reserve policymakers began to normalize both the level of interest rates and the size of the balance sheet. Together, Chair Yellen and I have worked to ensure a smooth leadership transition and provide for continuity in monetary policy. I also want to express my appreciation for my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Finally, I want to affirm my continued support for the objectives assigned to us by the Congress–maximum employment and price stability–and for transparency about the Federal Reserve’s policies and programs. Transparency is the foundation for our accountability, and I am committed to clearly explaining what we are doing and why we are doing it. Today I will briefly discuss the current economic situation and outlook before turning to monetary policy.

Current Economic Situation and Outlook
The U.S. economy grew at a solid pace over the second half of 2017 and into this year. Monthly job gains averaged 179,000 from July through December, and payrolls rose an additional 200,000 in January. This pace of job growth was sufficient to push the unemployment rate down to 4.1 percent, about 3/4 percentage point lower than a year earlier and the lowest level since December 2000. In addition, the labor force participation rate remained roughly unchanged, on net, as it has for the past several years–that is a sign of job market strength, given that retiring baby boomers are putting downward pressure on the participation rate. Strong job gains in recent years have led to widespread reductions in unemployment across the income spectrum and for all major demographic groups. For example, the unemployment rate for adults without a high school education has fallen from about 15 percent in 2009 to 5-1/2 percent in January of this year, while the jobless rate for those with a college degree has moved down from 5 percent to 2 percent over the same period. In addition, unemployment rates for African Americans and Hispanics are now at or below rates seen before the recession, although they are still significantly above the rate for whites. Wages have continued to grow moderately, with a modest acceleration in some measures, although the extent of the pickup likely has been damped in part by the weak pace of productivity growth in recent years.

Turning from the labor market to production, inflation-adjusted gross domestic product rose at an annual rate of about 3 percent in the second half of 2017, 1 percentage point faster than its pace in the first half of the year. Economic growth in the second half was led by solid gains in consumer spending, supported by rising household incomes and wealth, and upbeat sentiment. In addition, growth in business investment stepped up sharply last year, which should support higher productivity growth in time. The housing market has continued to improve slowly. Economic activity abroad also has been solid in recent quarters, and the associated strengthening in the demand for U.S. exports has provided considerable support to our manufacturing industry.

Against this backdrop of solid growth and a strong labor market, inflation has been low and stable. In fact, inflation has continued to run below the 2 percent rate that the FOMC judges to be most consistent over the longer run with our congressional mandate. Overall consumer prices, as measured by the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE), increased 1.7 percent in the 12 months ending in December, about the same as in 2016. The core PCE price index, which excludes the prices of energy and food items and is a better indicator of future inflation, rose 1.5 percent over the same period, somewhat less than in the previous year. We continue to view some of the shortfall in inflation last year as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat; consistent with this view, the monthly readings were a little higher toward the end of the year than in earlier months.

After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong. The robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment. Moreover, fiscal policy is becoming more stimulative. In this environment, we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term. Wages should increase at a faster pace as well. The Committee views the near-term risks to the economic outlook as roughly balanced but will continue to monitor inflation developments closely.

Monetary Policy
I will now turn to monetary policy. The Congress has assigned us the goals of promoting maximum employment and stable prices. Over the second half of 2017, the FOMC continued to gradually reduce monetary policy accommodation. Specifically, we raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point at our December meeting, bringing the target to a range of 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 percent. In addition, in October we initiated a balance sheet normalization program to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings. That program has been proceeding smoothly. These interest rate and balance sheet actions reflect the Committee’s view that gradually reducing monetary policy accommodation will sustain a strong labor market while fostering a return of inflation to 2 percent.

In gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis. While many factors shape the economic outlook, some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds: In particular, fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory. Despite the recent volatility, financial conditions remain accommodative. At the same time, inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

In evaluating the stance of monetary policy, the FOMC routinely consults monetary policy rules that connect prescriptions for the policy rate with variables associated with our mandated objectives. Personally, I find these rule prescriptions helpful. Careful judgments are required about the measurement of the variables used, as well as about the implications of the many issues these rules do not take into account. I would like to note that this Monetary Policy Report provides further discussion of monetary policy rules and their role in the Federal Reserve’s policy process, extending the analysis we introduced in July.

Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EZEpks Tyler Durden

Schiff Hints Mueller’s Next Indictment To Implicate Trump Team

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 13 Russian nationals earlier this month can only mean one thing according to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA): there’s more to come.

Speaking with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, Schiff – the ranking minority leader on the House Intelligence Committee, suggested that because Mueller was so extraordinarily detailed in his indictment of the 13 Russians, the Special Counsel’s office must be saving all the evidence of collusion pertaining to the DNC hack for the next indictment. 

Schiff points to the fact that there was “ample evidence” of Russia hacking the DNC, which – because Mueller didn’t include any of it in the “troll farm” indictment, obviously means things are just heating up. “And the key question there is: Is that going to involve Russian figures alone or are there going to be U.S. persons implicated as well?” posits Schiff. 

Earlier this month, Schiff told reporters at a newsmaker breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor “There is already, in my view, ample evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion if you’re willing to see it.” Schiff also said there is evidence — heard by the committee behind closed doors —that he can’t talk about publicly because it remains classified.

One thing I found striking about the indictment of these 13 Russians, aside from the fact of the extraordinary detail, and that is what is not included in the indictment. And that is the whole Russian hacking of these documents, the dumping of this information was not a part of that indictment. Now there is ample evidence for Bob Mueller to have included it. I can only conclude from the fact it was left out that Bob Mueller wants that to be part of a separate indictment. And the key question there is: Is that going to involve Russian figures alone or are there going to be U.S. persons implicated as well? –Adam Schiff

Of course, the evidence of all that Russian hacking was compiled by discredited cybersecurity firm, Crowdstrike, which was the only group allowed to analyze the hacked servers – while the FBI was told to buzz off. Perhaps Mueller’s team doesn’t feel confident using the independent report. One would think, however, that perhaps just one of the “17 intelligence agencies” which Hillary Clinton claims verified the hack could provide Mueller’s team with a little assist – or not, considering that it turns out only three agencies were involved in that assessment. 

Also, you can’t transfer files at 23 MB/s over the internet – at least not in the United States. That’s more of an “insider with a memory stick” kinda thing.

Perhaps Mueller doesn’t want to open that can of worms?

Shiff also failed to mention Mueller’s takedown of Paul Manafort and his right hand man Rick Gates on money laundering and fraud charges unrelated to the Trump campaign. Gates flipped on Manafort last week, changing his plea from not guilty to guilty on two charges; lying to Mueller’s team, and “impeding, impairing, obstructing and defeating” the DOJ and Treasury. 

Thus, it seems that Mueller having gone from indicting Trump’s campaign manager, to indicting 13 Russian internet trolls “with a shaky grasp of English and a rudimentary understanding of U.S. politics shitposting on Facebook,” doesn’t bode well for Schiff’s prediction.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2BSuLBC Tyler Durden

Bonds Rally Post-Powell-Remarks, After Biggest ETF Inflow…Ever

While its difficult to pick the bones out of the catalysts for the moves in bonds, stocks, and the dollar this morning – Powell remarks, weak DurGoods, strong inventories, weak housing, weak trade data – one thing of note is that the dollar and bonds are rallying together.

The kneejerk reaction to Powell (and the macro data-fest) was higher in yields, tagging pre-FOMC-Minutes levels, before they tumbled…

 

But as the following chart shows, the dollar and bonds are now rallying together…

 

Perhaps most notably this bond bid comes after the biggest inflow into iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF ever…

But, but, but, all the smart people said higher-rates are a no-brainer?

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2otQbxu Tyler Durden

Dalio: Central Banks Will Struggle When “Goldilocks” Ends In A Year Or Two

After flipping to a considerably more bearish view on where developed markets are in the business cycle earlier this month following the spike in average hourly wages, when he commented that everything had apparently changed in just a few days, Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio on Tuesday said during an interview with Bloomberg that central banks, most notably the Federal Reserve and ECB, will enjoy another year of two of the “goldilocks” scenario of strengthening growth and low inflation.

“We are in the Goldilocks part of the cycle, where it’s not too hot and not too cold,” he said. “We have growth and we don’t have an inflation problem. That’s the beautiful part of the cycle.”

But after that period is over, they will struggle to balance growth and inflation, adding that the US is further ahead in the economic cycle than Europe. The importance of getting policy just right during this shift will leave room for a dreaded policy error.

“Should we be concerned about inflation? I’d ask you – because it’s too low or because it’s too high? Isn’t it a funny question. There was a lot of concern that it was too low. Should we be concerned that it’s too high? We’re still struggling to get to 2%.

“In Europe is it a problem that there’s too much inflation, or too little inflation, I don’t know – you never get it perfect but it’s pretty good so I’m not concerned. What I am concerned about is, as we get into the later parts of the cycle, the challenge for central banks will be to get it perfectly.”

“When we have growth and we don’t have an inflation problem, that’s the beautiful part of the cycle. As we move into the later part of the cycle, which we’re moving toward, the breaks start to get applied.”

In Europe, Dalio expects the European Central Bank will wind down quantitative easing, but might wait to act on interest rates.

Dalio famously said during a speech at Davos in January that investors holding cash would be left “feeling pretty stupid” thanks to the combination of low inflation and strengthening growth that is creating a “just right” scenario for markets, adding that economic growth is in the late stage of the cycle, but could still continue improving for another year or two.

In a declaration that is puzzling considering Bridgewater’s massive Europe short, Dalio expressed admiration for ECB chief Mario Draghi and the European economy more generally – applauding central bankers for guiding it through a “beautiful deleveraging”. Draghi, Dalio said, should be “congratulated” for steering Europe through the financial crisis. Notably, Dalio declined to answer questions about Bridgewater’s recent $22 billion bet (it has since shrunk modestly) against some of the Continent’s biggest companies – a position that has increased from a “tiny” $700 million position in October.

As a reminder, here’s a breakdown of the companies Dalio is betting against (the number may have changed modestly):

Dalio

The European economy is coming off its best annual growth in a decade. Earlier today, Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann said the ECB could end its massive quantitative easing program – which it has been slowly tapering for a year now – by the end of 2018. He also said a rate hike in 2019 isn’t out of the question, per Reuters.

And here are Bridgewater’s biggest positions:

Chart

Of course, for all we know, Bridgewater could also have a substantial long position open in Europe via options and other alternatives to equities that regulators wouldn’t require it to disclose. Some traders have suggested that Bridgewater’s short could be part of a broader macro strategy to bet against global companies that are heavily reliant on their US business – which could be disrupted by the Trump administration’s crackdown on trade.

Earlier this month, Dalio and Bridgewater co-head of equity sales Bob Prince offered a surprisingly bearish take on market complacency, saying he expected this month’s shakeout to continue for the foreseeable future. Dalio later chimed in, writing a LinkedIn post where he declared that everything had changed in the past 10 days.

Watch the full Dalio interview below:

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EWFP3c Tyler Durden

Peso Coils As Mexico Prints Record-Smashing Trade Deficit

The peso can’t make its mind up as the Powell headlines, ECB comments, and US data power the dollar up and down; but the general tendency is lower as Mexico just printed a massive $4.4bn trade deficit in January – its largest ever.

Expectations were for a -$3.44bn deficit… they smashed that record…

(12 estimates ranged from $3.92bn deficit to $2.52bn deficit)

The biggest driver was a collapse in exports (down 14% MoM).

And for now, FX traders (and their favorite algos) can’t decide what to do…

This is preliminary data.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2otVkp3 Tyler Durden

Wholesale Inventories Build Most In 3 Years, Signal Q1 GDP Boost

Wholesale Inventories rose 4.5% YoY in January – the biggest annual build since June 2015 – as it appears the nation’s businesses are embracing the ‘field of dreams’ economy.

The 0.7% MoM rise in inventories is almost double expectations.

This better than expected inventory build will likely force an upside adjustment to Q1 GDP guesses (though Durable Goods disappointment may offset that).

And while we are reflecting on Q1 – is it not somewhat off-putting that inventories surged but orders tumbled in January?

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Co3Ezd Tyler Durden

Advance Data Signals Biggest US Trade Deficit In 10 Years

For the fifth month in a row, the US trade balance went deeper into deficit (if the advance data holds), hitting a larger than expected -$74.4bn in January – the biggest deficit since July 2008 (in the middle of the last recession).

Both imports and exports dropped in January:

  • Exports fell 2.2% in Jan. to $133.922b from $137.004b in the prior month

  • Imports fell 0.5% to $208.317b in Jan. from $209.263b in Dec.

But the overall picture is not pretty…

As a reminder, the trade deficit was actually at a record high ex-petroleum in December…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2FzC7tw Tyler Durden

Powell Testimony Highlights: Ignore Recent Volatility, Gradual Rate Hikes Will Continue

In advance of his first testimony before the House at 10am today, Fed Chair Jay Powell released his prepared remarks moments ago, as “some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds” and that the Fed can continue gradually raising interest rates as the outlook for growth remains strong, as and the recent bout of financial volatility shouldn’t weigh on the U.S. economy.

Commenting on Trump’s tax reform and policies, Powell said that “fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory.” He also glossed over the recent bout of volatility, “saying financial conditions remain accommodative.” At the same time, he noted that “inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.”

Of particular interest to markets will be Powell’s commentary on recent market events, which Powell is not too worried about: “After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong.

Looking forward, Powell said that “in gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis.”

Also notable is his conviction that “the economic outlook remains strong” because “the robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment.”

The Fed chair also said that “we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term,’’ and added that the lag in wages during the expansion was due to low gains in output per hour, or productivity, though a new wave of investment spending “should support higher productivity growth in time.’’

“Wages should increase at a faster pace as well,’’ Powell said, adding that the FOMC continued to view the shortfall in inflation last year “as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat.’’

Overall, a neutral commentary, one which clearly suggests that the recent market correction did not disturb the Fed, and one which hints that as long as “outlook remains strong”, rate hikes will continue…

His full testimony is below:

Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

Chairman Jerome H. Powell

Chairman Hensarling, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.

On the occasion of my first appearance before this Committee as Chairman of the Federal Reserve, I want to express my appreciation for my predecessor, Chair Janet Yellen, and her important contributions. During her term as Chair, the economy continued to strengthen and Federal Reserve policymakers began to normalize both the level of interest rates and the size of the balance sheet. Together, Chair Yellen and I have worked to ensure a smooth leadership transition and provide for continuity in monetary policy. I also want to express my appreciation for my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Finally, I want to affirm my continued support for the objectives assigned to us by the Congress–maximum employment and price stability–and for transparency about the Federal Reserve’s policies and programs. Transparency is the foundation for our accountability, and I am committed to clearly explaining what we are doing and why we are doing it. Today I will briefly discuss the current economic situation and outlook before turning to monetary policy.

Current Economic Situation and Outlook
The U.S. economy grew at a solid pace over the second half of 2017 and into this year. Monthly job gains averaged 179,000 from July through December, and payrolls rose an additional 200,000 in January. This pace of job growth was sufficient to push the unemployment rate down to 4.1 percent, about 3/4 percentage point lower than a year earlier and the lowest level since December 2000. In addition, the labor force participation rate remained roughly unchanged, on net, as it has for the past several years–that is a sign of job market strength, given that retiring baby boomers are putting downward pressure on the participation rate. Strong job gains in recent years have led to widespread reductions in unemployment across the income spectrum and for all major demographic groups. For example, the unemployment rate for adults without a high school education has fallen from about 15 percent in 2009 to 5-1/2 percent in January of this year, while the jobless rate for those with a college degree has moved down from 5 percent to 2 percent over the same period. In addition, unemployment rates for African Americans and Hispanics are now at or below rates seen before the recession, although they are still significantly above the rate for whites. Wages have continued to grow moderately, with a modest acceleration in some measures, although the extent of the pickup likely has been damped in part by the weak pace of productivity growth in recent years.

Turning from the labor market to production, inflation-adjusted gross domestic product rose at an annual rate of about 3 percent in the second half of 2017, 1 percentage point faster than its pace in the first half of the year. Economic growth in the second half was led by solid gains in consumer spending, supported by rising household incomes and wealth, and upbeat sentiment. In addition, growth in business investment stepped up sharply last year, which should support higher productivity growth in time. The housing market has continued to improve slowly. Economic activity abroad also has been solid in recent quarters, and the associated strengthening in the demand for U.S. exports has provided considerable support to our manufacturing industry.

Against this backdrop of solid growth and a strong labor market, inflation has been low and stable. In fact, inflation has continued to run below the 2 percent rate that the FOMC judges to be most consistent over the longer run with our congressional mandate. Overall consumer prices, as measured by the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE), increased 1.7 percent in the 12 months ending in December, about the same as in 2016. The core PCE price index, which excludes the prices of energy and food items and is a better indicator of future inflation, rose 1.5 percent over the same period, somewhat less than in the previous year. We continue to view some of the shortfall in inflation last year as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat; consistent with this view, the monthly readings were a little higher toward the end of the year than in earlier months.

After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong. The robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment. Moreover, fiscal policy is becoming more stimulative. In this environment, we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term. Wages should increase at a faster pace as well. The Committee views the near-term risks to the economic outlook as roughly balanced but will continue to monitor inflation developments closely.

Monetary Policy
I will now turn to monetary policy. The Congress has assigned us the goals of promoting maximum employment and stable prices. Over the second half of 2017, the FOMC continued to gradually reduce monetary policy accommodation. Specifically, we raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point at our December meeting, bringing the target to a range of 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 percent. In addition, in October we initiated a balance sheet normalization program to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings. That program has been proceeding smoothly. These interest rate and balance sheet actions reflect the Committee’s view that gradually reducing monetary policy accommodation will sustain a strong labor market while fostering a return of inflation to 2 percent.

In gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis. While many factors shape the economic outlook, some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds: In particular, fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory. Despite the recent volatility, financial conditions remain accommodative. At the same time, inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

In evaluating the stance of monetary policy, the FOMC routinely consults monetary policy rules that connect prescriptions for the policy rate with variables associated with our mandated objectives. Personally, I find these rule prescriptions helpful. Careful judgments are required about the measurement of the variables used, as well as about the implications of the many issues these rules do not take into account. I would like to note that this Monetary Policy Report provides further discussion of monetary policy rules and their role in the Federal Reserve’s policy process, extending the analysis we introduced in July.

Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EZzNuX Tyler Durden

Durable Goods Orders Tumble In January

Durable goods orders slumped unexpectedly in January – dropping 3.7% MoM (vs a 2.0% expected decline), and worse still, December’s bounce was revised lower as the ‘uneven-ness’ of the so-called recovery rears its ugly head once again.

The uglier picture here is that January’s plunge is not a reflection of a one-off December surge (in aircraft or defense orders) as we have seen previously.

Core durable goods orders dropped for the first time in 7 months…

Non-Defense new orders also declined MoM.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Cnx1BW Tyler Durden

Trump Tweets: Russia Probe Is A “Witch Hunt” With “No Evidence Of Collusion”

After taking a notable break from Twitter early this week, President Donald Trump sent out a flurry of tweets this morning on one of his favorite topics: Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

The tweets come after Mueller secured a guilty plea from former Paul Manafort deputy Rick Gates, who is now believed to be cooperating with the investigation. Mueller also recently secured a guilty plea from Dutch lawyer Alex van der Zwaan for lying to investigators about his interactions with Gates.

In a series of tweets, Trump offers several quotes from an appearance by Fox judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News last night where he the judge opined that “written answers” would be a victory for the president, referring to a report last week that Trump’s lawyers are pushing for Mueller to accept limited testimony from Trump, including the possibility of offering written answers to the Mueller team’s questions.

Napolitano soon turned the conversation to Hillary Clinton’s criminality and any evidence that might remain at the DOJ, saying “somebody in the Justice Department has a treasure trove of evidence of Mrs. Clinton’s criminality…” which Trump quoted…

 

 

…Along with several other comments from pundits expressing skepticism about the investigation…

 

 

 

…Before ending his tweetstorm with a familiar declaration…

 

 

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2HRzOmu Tyler Durden