Today in Supreme Court History: November 25, 1757

11/25/1757: Henry Brockholst Livingston’s birthday. He dissented in the property law classic, Pierson v. Post (NY 1805).

Justice Henry Brockholst Livingston

The post Today in Supreme Court History: November 25, 1757 appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3nPaKDq
via IFTTT

This Thanksgiving, I’m Grateful for America’s Generosity and Unprecedented Charitable Giving


joel-muniz-A4Ax1ApccfA-unsplash

Thanksgiving is a time for reflecting on all those things for which we are grateful. It seems particularly important now at the end of the second year featuring a pandemic and unprecedented restrictions. This past year also brought many abuses of government powers with long-lasting consequences. Americans’ discontent is incredibly high, and some scholars worry that for the first time in over 150 years, we could be heading toward an epic slip downward.

Despite all these problems, if one takes a moment to think about it, the goodness and charity of people remain in such abundance that gratitude is warranted.

This summer, I lost my mom. She was a wonderful person and one of the best moms ever. (I realize that I’m biased, but I’m also serious.) She was generous and funny, intellectually curious and so easy to please. Despite living in France, far from me and my daughters, she was unfailingly a regular presence in our lives. This was still true even during the last two years when her chronic illness and travel bans made it impossible for us to be together. For example, she organized FaceTime cooking sessions with her granddaughters to teach them the art of baking macarons and pains au chocolat.

To say that I was heartbroken at her passing is the deepest understatement. However, I can’t think of this time without feeling the sincerest sense of gratitude for my friends, colleagues, and even strangers who have gone out of their way to make this loss easier for my girls and me to bear.

During this time, they prayed and never left my side even though an ocean and a six-hour time difference separated us. Even friends who I hadn’t seen in years reached out with warm words. They sent letters telling me about their own experiences, which provided me with the assurance that I would be OK. When I came back to the U.S., I found a care package with vodka and bourbon (my two liquors of choice), a DoorDash gift card, and other thoughtful gifts.

As grateful as I am for my friends, I’ll be forever touched by my professional colleagues. They were flexible with me and my daughters as we stayed in France longer than originally planned to attend my mother’s funeral. Some colleagues canceled whatever plans they had to take care of our cats so I wouldn’t have to worry about it. One of my colleagues sent a Victor Hugo poem in French that was so moving my youngest daughter read it at her grandmother’s service. Beautiful hydrangeas—my mother’s favorite flowers—were planted in my yard as a reminder that life goes on and there is so much beauty in the world. And a few days later, Memphis Barbecue was sent to us with the knowledge that there is no state of despair or lack of appetite in which I would turn down ribs and pulled pork.

What this difficult time reminded me of is that no matter how ugly our country’s politics become, this nation is still made of millions of people who care deeply for one another. We could, of course, see this during the pandemic when people went out of their way to help their older neighbors, restaurants took actions to take care of their communities, churches fed the disadvantaged, and investors poured millions of dollars into finding answers to alleviate the crisis.

In the end, I am most grateful to live in a country where we are wealthy enough that people have the luxury to care for one another. But this caring goes beyond helping and comforting those we know. We can see it too in the scale of charitable giving in America. The philanthropy monitor Giving USA reported that in 2020, “individuals, bequests, foundations and corporations gave an estimated $471.44 billion to U.S. charities.” This number was both unprecedentedly large and unexpected.

We in the U.S. are fortunate that charitable giving and altruism are so ingrained in our history and culture. As we know from Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville’s reporting, the unique civic and economic role of voluntarism and charity has been a core part of American culture for centuries.

For that tradition, I am thankful.

COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM

The post This Thanksgiving, I'm Grateful for America's Generosity and Unprecedented Charitable Giving appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3HSlIQJ
via IFTTT

German Power Prices Soar As Arctic Blast To Bring “Significant Snow” 

German Power Prices Soar As Arctic Blast To Bring “Significant Snow” 

Europe’s first cold spell of the heating season has arrived, pressuring power prices higher as freezing temperatures ushers in increased power demand to heat building structures across the central-west region. 

German day-ahead power prices jumped to the second-highest level ever, 273.89 euros per megawatt-hour. Day-ahead power prices are also higher in France and Netherlands. 

The Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), the German Meteorological Service, released a weather note on Tuesday warning of frigid and snowy weather. 

“Right on time for the first weekend in Advent and shortly before the start of the meteorological winter on Dec. 1, there is the first significant snow in Germany, at least in the middle and higher altitudes,” DWD said. 

Weather models for Germany show between Nov. 24 – Dec. 4. — the average temperature will hover well below the 30-year norm or around 30-35 degrees. Low temps will dip into the mid 20 degrees Fahrenheit. 

The cold blast has boosted the heating degree day forecast well above the 30-year norm through Dec. 4. This means power demand will surge as people turn up their thermostats. 

The cold snap will test Germany and the other parts of Europe’s energy systems already under stress due to the lowest natural gas stockpiles since 2013. There appears to be no relief in dwindling gas flows into the continent as German energy regulators decided to suspend the Nord Stream 2 pipeline certification process last week. With every hiccup the Russian to German pipeline faces, natural gas prices increase, forcing power prices higher. There’s also the issue that more power generation has to be diverted from alternative energy sources to fossil fuels due to unreliability: 

“Wind generation and temperatures below the seasonal norm are increasing gas-for-power and heating demand; this provides bullish pressure to day-ahead contract,” Inspired Energy said in a report.

Europe is staring into a perfect storm of forces that could spark a winter of discontent and continue socio-economic chaos on the continent. EU politicians won’t publicly say, but they need Putin’s gas to avert an energy crisis this coming winter that could sweep many politicians out of power due to uncontrollable energy inflation. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/25/2021 – 06:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3cMMMT7 Tyler Durden

The Baltic Way


Lithuania_Estonia_Latvia

Reason‘s December special issue marks the 30th anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union. This story is part of our exploration of the global legacy of that evil empire, and our effort to be certain that the dire consequences of communism are not forgotten.

The Soviet story of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania begins in August 1939. German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov came together to sign the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which granted their respective countries partitioning and annexation power over several Eastern European nations. Nazi Germany split Poland with the Soviets, and the Baltic states went to the USSR.

Decades of brutal Soviet rule would follow. On the 50th anniversary of the pact’s signing, the nationalist movements of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania decided to issue a collective call for independence. They organized the Baltic Way—a continuous human chain comprised of 2 million people, spanning 675 kilometers, traversing the three nations in a display of solidarity and peaceful resistance.

That unity continued as the Soviet Union fell. Where one Baltic state went, the other two soon followed. Lithuania became the first former Soviet republic to declare independence on March 11, 1990; Latvia and Estonia did the same just two months later. As Estonia pioneered radical economic reforms in its early post-Soviet days, Lithuania and Latvia would often adopt them with minor adjustments. Rejection of the Soviet Union and its lingering shadow came quickly, decisively, and uniformly in the Baltic states.

From the very beginning of the Soviet Union’s dissolution, the Baltics were a bloc apart. Their unwavering pursuit of national sovereignty and thorough rejection of the Soviet way of doing business have driven their unrivaled success.

In 1993, the Estonian foreign ministry argued in an internal memo that “the most important lesson is simple: time is short and time will not wait for small nations.” Though small, the Baltic states did not shrink from big actions. The three countries spent the ’90s completely overhauling their economic systems to recover from Soviet life. They focused on deregulation of trade and prices. Estonia, having done away with all foreign tariffs, was at that point the only truly free trading European country.

Macroeconomic stabilization came in 1992, with the three nations establishing their own currencies that summer. A “ruble zone,” using the Soviet currency, persisted in many of the independent republics after 1991—but the Baltic states decisively rejected such ties. Tax reforms were drastic. All three countries implemented flat income tax systems in 1994 and 1995, the first modern nations to do so. According to Anders Åslund, a Swedish economist who researches transition economies, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania “have been firm fiscal conservatives, regardless of political party in power, carrying out radical expenditure cuts aimed at a balanced budget.”

More than any other former Soviet republics, the Baltic states were reluctant to engage politically with the Russo-sphere after 1991. A number of former Soviet republics came together to form the Commonwealth of Independent States in 1991 with the aim of multilateral cooperation on trade and diplomacy. Though some member nations have come and gone, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have never joined. They’ve instead pursued a pro-European path.

After nearly a decade of interaction under a European Association Agreement, the Baltic states joined the European Union in 2004. They joined NATO that same year, an explicit rejection of Russian influence. “In 1997, when Russian President Boris Yeltsin dangled unilateral Russian security guarantees in exchange for giving up on the Baltics’ NATO hopes, the offer was promptly rejected,” writes Andris Banka at War on the Rocks. They are the only former Soviet states with successful E.U. and NATO membership bids.

Reform of domestic institutions worked in tandem with these outward-facing goals. Estonia took a radical approach to the public sector and fired all government employees, giving it what Åslund calls “the best governance of all post-communist countries.” All three scrubbed their security apparatuses of Soviet influence and rooted out corruption. A robust free market of print and broadcast outlets emerged, attracting significant investment from Scandinavian media corporations, which hold major stakes in Baltic media to this day.

Political rights and civil liberties remain rock-solid in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania thanks to early reform efforts. Freedom House, which grades countries on their political rights and civil liberties, gives Estonia a score of 94 out of 100 points—tying it for 18th in the world and ahead of many other Western nations. Latvia and Lithuania are not far behind, with 89 and 90 points, respectively. Every election in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania since 1991 has been considered free and fair by outside observers. No other former Soviet republic has managed to accomplish that.

The decisive pivot from the Soviet way of life, though not without its sticking points, has kept the Baltic states prosperous to this day. Part of that success has stemmed from the vibrant innovation that takes place in the region. During the Soviet era, the Baltic economies centered on timber, dairy products, and agriculture. They’ve traded those in for software, electronics, and information technology products.

Estonia launched its e-Residency program in 2014, allowing non-Estonians to access Estonian services and start businesses in the country from outside its borders. As of 2018, the World Bank ranks all three countries in the global top 20 for ease of doing business. Estonia is the richest of the former Soviet republics, with Latvia and Lithuania taking second and third place.

Still, it hasn’t always been rosy. All three Baltic states struggle with emigration, a side effect of the increased movement brought on by E.U. membership. Between 1990 and 2017, Latvia lost 27 percent of its population, and Lithuania lost 23 percent. Estonia experienced a more modest decline—from a population of more than 1.5 million in 1991 to a current tally of around 1.3 million—but demographers still worry about the nation’s long-term prospects for growth. An estimated 20 percent of Latvians live abroad, according to the Migration Policy Institute, and Lithuania and Estonia estimate that “17 percent and 15 percent of their nationals, respectively, live outside their country of birth.”

The 2009 financial crisis provided one of the biggest tests for the Baltic economies, hitting them much harder than other parts of the E.U. The Baltic states have large export sectors tied to Western European supply chains; when demand cratered during the recession, they felt the heat. Estonia’s gross domestic product fell by 13.1 percent between the third quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Latvia and Lithuania saw declines of similar magnitude. With their unemployment rates rising, many citizens of those countries left for greener pastures.

Austerity measures helped, however, and the International Monetary Fund anticipates that they’ll see some of the highest growth among E.U. nations following the economic shock of COVID-19.

The Baltic states have proved resilient and plucky in the face of many storms. Most of their fellow post-Soviet republics have not been so lucky, seeing despots take control, civil liberties become corrupted, and economies falter. But independence, internationalism, and innovation have defined these three nations since 1991 and kept them afloat. Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians may not be physically connected the way they were on that day in August 1989 when they marked five decades under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. But the Baltic Way lives on.

The post The Baltic Way appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3oWrt7q
via IFTTT

Happy Thanksgiving, Now Here’s Two Reasons Why The Market Could Collapse In December

Happy Thanksgiving, Now Here’s Two Reasons Why The Market Could Collapse In December

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

Most traders have a tendency to pay little attention to the market, put themselves on autopilot and hope for the best heading from Thanksgiving into the end of the year. This year, I’m getting a feeling that this strategy might not work well for what could be looming in December.

The short-lived rally yesterday on news of Jerome Powell being re-nominated as Fed Chair was a nice reminder that the market doesn’t like surprises, changes, or volatility of any kind. After all, the market rallied on the selection of the “hawkish” choice, between Powell and Lael Brainerd.

While Brainerd was widely seen as the more dovish of the two potential Fed chairs, the market still celebrated the fact that there would be no change at the position by rallying early in the session, as soon as the news broke, yesterday. Then, reality kicked in and the market swung sharply lower during mid-day session, before doing the same at the cash close.

All three indexes finished the day far off their highs. Tech stocks got the worst of it, with the Nasdaq Composite dropping more than 1%.

I have already detailed several reasons why I believe the NASDAQ could be on the verge of a collapse without warning here: Why We Could Be Staring Down The Barrel of A Catastrophic NASDAQ Crash And Not Even Know It

Now, I want to add to those reasons.

I got this feeling yesterday, while it was taking place, that the sharp intraday reversal needed to be paid attention to.

The signs that I think do not bode well for the market heading into the holidays are:

  1. The market’s realization that a taper is now definitely on its way.

  2. A rotation from shitty tech names into value.

The Taper Is Definitely On Its Way

The jitters yesterday, in my opinion, were catalyzed by the realization that even though there will be no change at the Fed chair position, Jerome Powell is going to try to see through his plan of tapering and, upon re-nomination, has very little holding him back from going rogue. By that I mean there will be little stopping Powell from taking extraordinary measures to try to curb inflation if he wants and/or needs to.

This man is officially in the driver’s seat now:

Photo: The Atlantic

“Why worry about the taper,” you’ll ask. “It’ll never last!”

You might be right – but that isn’t going to change the market’s expectation of it working over the next couple months.

I’ll be the first person to joke that continued QE isn’t going to work. Me and my kind often argue that any taper will be short-lived before it stirs up market volatility and elected officials eventually give in and resort back to more quantitative easing. However, this won’t matter in the short term. That next leg up for the market from another round of insane stimulus is a long, long, long while away. Hell, look at how far we have come since just March of 2020.

Reality is going to have to rear its head at some point.

Whether we follow through or not, with Powell at the helm we now have to at least attempt the taper, which I believe is going to wind up moving the market lower over the next couple of months.

I’m often one of the first people to joke about how nonsensical the idea of a Santa Claus rally is, but it puts the idea of a rising market over the holidays into everybody’s head, every year. Obviously, it’s just made up bullshit-lingo used to provide an excuse for people to buy overvalued money losing crap in the market, but it seems like a good year to remind market participants that a rally doesn’t always have to happen.

For example, remember in 2018 when Steve Mnuchin had to “call the banks” after the market slid heading into Christmas Eve?

I think we could be on the precipice of repeating that type of holiday plunge. In other words, Santa Claus may not be around for the rally this year. Instead, he might drink too much bourbon and pass out drunk on the pool table at his local watering hole.

Jerome Powell has been under pressure – and will continue to be under pressure – during his second term the likes of which he hasn’t seen yet. Not only will he face angry politicians from the right who want to drum up fear about a very real inflation problem, he’s going to have to face sharp criticism from those on the left that wanted him out of his position for not being dovish enough. Either way, I think he commits to try and stick the landing on the taper, which could result in some serious shit for equity markets.

Finally, while I am talking about a potential pullback in anticipation of the taper, I am also expecting a pullback once the taper begins. There’s no doubt about it: tapering crashes markets. It has pretty much always happened and there’s no reason not to expect it won’t happen going forward, especially as we reside in the biggest bubble in market history.

Tech Selling Off Suggests A Rotation From Growth To Value

Another thing I noticed in yesterday’s trading was that several of my value stocks were rising while the overall market seemed to be plunging. I saw green in names like Lockheed Martin, Disney, Walmart and Johnson and Johnson, while the tech index sold off hard.

To me, this looks like the rotation from growth to value that I have been talking about over the last couple weeks could finally be getting started.

Opinion: Here's how to resolve the growth vs. value debate - MarketWatch
Photo: Marketwatch

Further evidencing a potential rotation was a move out of non-profitable tech companies yesterday, as my kind friends at Zerohedge pointed out late in the day yesterday.

Image

Finally, everyone’s favorite collection of dogshit-placed-into-a-paper-bag-and-lit-on-fire-then-called-an-ETF (AKA the Ark “Innovation Fund”), has also experienced a tough last week, plunging 7.76% in just 5 trading days.

Make no mistake about it, a “rotation” into Dow components and profitable companies from tech garbage would catalyze a sharp move lower for the overall markets. Most of the leverage, unsophisticated investors and super-speculative (read: fraud and bilge) companies in the market reside in tech. There are still huge bubbles in meme favorites like AMC and GMC, among others, that need to have the air let out of them. Crypto remains a multi-trillion dollar air pocket. If the market decides to start valuing 15x PE names like Lockheed Martin – as I suggested it might, days ago – in favor of buying AMC at a $30 billion market cap while the CEO dumps all of his holdings , look out below.

And so what’s the moral of the story today?

The rotation trade from growth to value could very much be on and we may experience a market that decides to pull back with some significance now that the smoke has cleared and everyone realizes Jerome Powell – at least for now – is a guaranteed attempt at a taper.

Read more from QTR:

1. Covid Is Over (If You Want It)

2. Two Reasons The Market Could Collapse Heading Into The Holidays

3. When The Global Monetary Reset Happens, Don’t Forget Who To Blame

4. Pride Goeth Before The Bitcoin Fall

This was a free preview of paid content from QTR’s Fringe Finance. Zerohedge readers always get 10% off a subscription to my blog for life by using this link.

DISCLAIMER: I am long JNJ, DIS, LMT, WMT and short ARKK, IWM, SPY. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/25/2021 – 06:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3r56wK9 Tyler Durden

The Baltic Way


Lithuania_Estonia_Latvia

Reason‘s December special issue marks the 30th anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union. This story is part of our exploration of the global legacy of that evil empire, and our effort to be certain that the dire consequences of communism are not forgotten.

The Soviet story of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania begins in August 1939. German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov came together to sign the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which granted their respective countries partitioning and annexation power over several Eastern European nations. Nazi Germany split Poland with the Soviets, and the Baltic states went to the USSR.

Decades of brutal Soviet rule would follow. On the 50th anniversary of the pact’s signing, the nationalist movements of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania decided to issue a collective call for independence. They organized the Baltic Way—a continuous human chain comprised of 2 million people, spanning 675 kilometers, traversing the three nations in a display of solidarity and peaceful resistance.

That unity continued as the Soviet Union fell. Where one Baltic state went, the other two soon followed. Lithuania became the first former Soviet republic to declare independence on March 11, 1990; Latvia and Estonia did the same just two months later. As Estonia pioneered radical economic reforms in its early post-Soviet days, Lithuania and Latvia would often adopt them with minor adjustments. Rejection of the Soviet Union and its lingering shadow came quickly, decisively, and uniformly in the Baltic states.

From the very beginning of the Soviet Union’s dissolution, the Baltics were a bloc apart. Their unwavering pursuit of national sovereignty and thorough rejection of the Soviet way of doing business have driven their unrivaled success.

In 1993, the Estonian foreign ministry argued in an internal memo that “the most important lesson is simple: time is short and time will not wait for small nations.” Though small, the Baltic states did not shrink from big actions. The three countries spent the ’90s completely overhauling their economic systems to recover from Soviet life. They focused on deregulation of trade and prices. Estonia, having done away with all foreign tariffs, was at that point the only truly free trading European country.

Macroeconomic stabilization came in 1992, with the three nations establishing their own currencies that summer. A “ruble zone,” using the Soviet currency, persisted in many of the independent republics after 1991—but the Baltic states decisively rejected such ties. Tax reforms were drastic. All three countries implemented flat income tax systems in 1994 and 1995, the first modern nations to do so. According to Anders Åslund, a Swedish economist who researches transition economies, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania “have been firm fiscal conservatives, regardless of political party in power, carrying out radical expenditure cuts aimed at a balanced budget.”

More than any other former Soviet republics, the Baltic states were reluctant to engage politically with the Russo-sphere after 1991. A number of former Soviet republics came together to form the Commonwealth of Independent States in 1991 with the aim of multilateral cooperation on trade and diplomacy. Though some member nations have come and gone, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have never joined. They’ve instead pursued a pro-European path.

After nearly a decade of interaction under a European Association Agreement, the Baltic states joined the European Union in 2004. They joined NATO that same year, an explicit rejection of Russian influence. “In 1997, when Russian President Boris Yeltsin dangled unilateral Russian security guarantees in exchange for giving up on the Baltics’ NATO hopes, the offer was promptly rejected,” writes Andris Banka at War on the Rocks. They are the only former Soviet states with successful E.U. and NATO membership bids.

Reform of domestic institutions worked in tandem with these outward-facing goals. Estonia took a radical approach to the public sector and fired all government employees, giving it what Åslund calls “the best governance of all post-communist countries.” All three scrubbed their security apparatuses of Soviet influence and rooted out corruption. A robust free market of print and broadcast outlets emerged, attracting significant investment from Scandinavian media corporations, which hold major stakes in Baltic media to this day.

Political rights and civil liberties remain rock-solid in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania thanks to early reform efforts. Freedom House, which grades countries on their political rights and civil liberties, gives Estonia a score of 94 out of 100 points—tying it for 18th in the world and ahead of many other Western nations. Latvia and Lithuania are not far behind, with 89 and 90 points, respectively. Every election in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania since 1991 has been considered free and fair by outside observers. No other former Soviet republic has managed to accomplish that.

The decisive pivot from the Soviet way of life, though not without its sticking points, has kept the Baltic states prosperous to this day. Part of that success has stemmed from the vibrant innovation that takes place in the region. During the Soviet era, the Baltic economies centered on timber, dairy products, and agriculture. They’ve traded those in for software, electronics, and information technology products.

Estonia launched its e-Residency program in 2014, allowing non-Estonians to access Estonian services and start businesses in the country from outside its borders. As of 2018, the World Bank ranks all three countries in the global top 20 for ease of doing business. Estonia is the richest of the former Soviet republics, with Latvia and Lithuania taking second and third place.

Still, it hasn’t always been rosy. All three Baltic states struggle with emigration, a side effect of the increased movement brought on by E.U. membership. Between 1990 and 2017, Latvia lost 27 percent of its population, and Lithuania lost 23 percent. Estonia experienced a more modest decline—from a population of more than 1.5 million in 1991 to a current tally of around 1.3 million—but demographers still worry about the nation’s long-term prospects for growth. An estimated 20 percent of Latvians live abroad, according to the Migration Policy Institute, and Lithuania and Estonia estimate that “17 percent and 15 percent of their nationals, respectively, live outside their country of birth.”

The 2009 financial crisis provided one of the biggest tests for the Baltic economies, hitting them much harder than other parts of the E.U. The Baltic states have large export sectors tied to Western European supply chains; when demand cratered during the recession, they felt the heat. Estonia’s gross domestic product fell by 13.1 percent between the third quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Latvia and Lithuania saw declines of similar magnitude. With their unemployment rates rising, many citizens of those countries left for greener pastures.

Austerity measures helped, however, and the International Monetary Fund anticipates that they’ll see some of the highest growth among E.U. nations following the economic shock of COVID-19.

The Baltic states have proved resilient and plucky in the face of many storms. Most of their fellow post-Soviet republics have not been so lucky, seeing despots take control, civil liberties become corrupted, and economies falter. But independence, internationalism, and innovation have defined these three nations since 1991 and kept them afloat. Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians may not be physically connected the way they were on that day in August 1989 when they marked five decades under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. But the Baltic Way lives on.

The post The Baltic Way appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3cKxxu3
via IFTTT

Russian Lawmaker Says He Would ‘Execute’ People By Firing Squad For Buying And Selling Fake Vaxx Cards 

Russian Lawmaker Says He Would ‘Execute’ People By Firing Squad For Buying And Selling Fake Vaxx Cards 

The rise in counterfeit vaccine certificates has enranged one Russian lawmaker who proposed that anyone who buys or sells certificates be executed by firing squad. He even said he would pull the trigger himself. 

Vladimir Sidorov, a Russian lawmaker from the ruling United Russia party serving in the region of Duma in Ryazan, told fellow legislators on Tuesday the need for harsher punishments for people who buy and sell the documents illegally. “It is necessary to shoot them,” he shouted.

Sidorov said he “would participate in the shootings.” “Be sure to do it! You and I have no other choice,” he urged fellow lawmakers. 

The emotionally charged lawmaker immediately walked back his speech after it went viral on social media and sparked criticism among netizens. He said he was emotionally overwhelmed during his rant after the loss of his wife to COVID. He did emphasize that anyone who buys or sells fake vaccination certificates should face “tough punishment.” He added that “no one likes restrictions, but vaccination is the key to surviving a pandemic.”

Shindorov’s call for harsher punishments coincided with the Russian Ministry of Health’s proposal to slap anyone who sells fake vaccination cards with fines up to $67,150. The severity of the penalty depends on if the person acted alone or as part of an organized crime gang. 

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova announced plans earlier this month to make QR codes on smartphones a form of health passport for entry into restaurants and retail shops across the country to combat counterfeit vaccines certificates. 

Russia is battling the fourth wave of the virus pandemic as the death toll continues to climb to near all-time highs, but the number of new infections has waned. The surge in deaths comes amid low vaccination rates. 

Governments worldwide are cracking down on fake COVID certificates. No politician (besides one in Russia) has dared to mention they would execute someone for selling fake vaxx cards but rather slap them with hefty fines

Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/25/2021 – 05:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/32yKuVS Tyler Durden

With Low Vaccination Rates, Africa’s COVID Deaths Remain Far Below Europe & US

With Low Vaccination Rates, Africa’s COVID Deaths Remain Far Below Europe & US

Authored by Ryan McMaken via The Mises Institute,

Since the very beginning of the covid panic, the narrative has been this: implement severe lockdowns or your population will experience a bloodbath.

Morgues will be overwhelmed, the death total toll will be astounding. On the other hand, we were assured those jurisdictions that do lock down would see only a fraction of the death toll.

Then, once vaccines became available, the narrative was modified to:

“Get shots in arms and then covid will stop spreading. Those countries without vaccines, on the other hand, will continue to face mass casualties.”

The lockdown narrative, of course, has already been thoroughly overturned.

Jurisdictions that did not lock down or adopted only weak and short lockdowns ended up with covid death tolls that were either similar to—or even better than—death tolls in countries that adopted draconian lockdowns. Lockdown advocates said locked-down countries would be overwhelmingly better off. These people were clearly wrong. 

Undaunted by the increasing implausibility of the lockdown narrative, the global health bureaucrats are nonetheless doubling down on forced vaccines—as we now see in Austria—and we continue to be assured that only countries with high vaccination rates can hope to avoid disastrous covid outcomes. 

Yet, the experience in sub-Saharan Africa calls both these narratives into question: Africa’s numbers have been far, far lower than the experts warned would be the case. 

For example, the AP reported this week that in spite of low vaccination rates, Africa has fared better than most of the world:

[T]here is something “mysterious” going on in Africa that is puzzling scientists, said Wafaa El-Sadr, chair of global health at Columbia University.

“Africa doesn’t have the vaccines and the resources to fight COVID-19 that they have in Europe and the U.S., but somehow they seem to be doing better,” she said….

Fewer than 6% of people in Africa are vaccinated. For months, the WHO has described Africa as “one of the least affected regions in the world” in its weekly pandemic reports.

Yet disaster for Africa has long been predicted for several reasons even beyond the availability of vaccines. For instance, it is known that lockdowns are especially impractical in the poorest parts of the world. This is because populations in places with undeveloped economies can’t simply sit at home and live off savings or debt. Rather, these people must go out into the world and earn a living on a day-to-day basis. Starvation is the alternative. Moreover, much of this work is done in the informal economy, so enforcing lockdowns becomes especially difficult.

Source: Our World in Data (Confirmed Deaths per Million, November 19, 2021;  Share of People Vaccinated against Covid-19, November 19, 2021).

It was also assumed covid would be especially deadly in Africa due to the fact many large households live in small housing units.

But that “conventional wisdom” flies in the face of the reality of covid in Africa, which is that there have been fewer deaths.

The “experts” have groped around, looking for possible explanations.

Some sources, for example, insist that the low death totals are only an artifact of incomplete reporting on covid infections and that “a lack of good qualitative data was the issue.”

But Richard Wamai at Northeastern University rejects the claim it’s all about case reporting, and says that local systems for reporting deaths in Africa make it difficult to hide COVID-19 casualties.” In a paper for the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Wamai and his coauthors conclude, “[T]here is no evidence that COVID-19 mortality data is less accurately reported in Africa than elsewhere” and “While the true picture of infections and mortality in the continent has yet to fully emerge, the quality of data for other diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, indicates that Africa has the capacity to collect and report valid disease surveillance data.”

In any case, the World Health Organization reports that covid deaths in Africa make up only 2.9 percent of covid deaths, while Africa’s population is 16 percent of the global total. Africa’s covid total could double or triple, and Africa would still be faring far better than Europe and the Americas.

Wamai et al. also note that at this point “[i]t is likely that SARS-CoV-2 has already been widely disseminated through Africa…. If so, widespread infection is likely to also result in widespread natural immunity.”

In other words, continued claims by health officials—both in Africa and elsewhere—that mass death is right around the corner with the “next wave” look increasingly implausible. 

It looks increasingly likely that the lack of covid mortality in Africa is not due to a data issue nor a situation in which covid has been “contained” up until now. So then why is Africa doing so much better than the wealthy West?

Naturally, the advocates of forced lockdowns and coerced vaccines would prefer to ignore this issue altogether, but the undeniable reality of Africa’s experience has forced mainstream researchers to publicly admit the many ways that many factors can explain covid’s prevalence beyond vaccination rates and mask mandates.

For instance, mentioning that obesity is an important factor in covid mortality has in the past been likely to get one savaged in the media for “fat shaming.” Yet the Africa situation has forced the well informed to admit that yes, obese populations clearly suffer more from covid. In Africa, not surprisingly, we find that obesity rates are far below those found in North America and Europe.

Other possible explanations forwarded as reasons for Africa’s situation include past exposure to other coronaviruses, youthful populations, fewer patients lacking zinc and vitamin D, past use of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination, climate, genetic background, and parasite load

In addressing the African “enigma” one group of researchers in the journal Colombia medica dared even suggest it’s possible—although not conclusively shown at this point—that “a mass public health preventive campaign against COVID-19 may have taken place, inadvertently, in some African countries with massive community ivermectin use.”

Source: “Global Obesity Levels,” ProCon.org, last modified March 27, 2020; Our World in Data (Share of People Vaccinated against Covid-19, November 19, 2021).

In the West, however, the media drumbeat around covid has consistently been “Shut up, stay home, get jabbed, and stop doubting the experts on forced vaccines.” Fortunately, however, the African situation has forced many researchers to ask inconvenient questions.

In fact, it’s amazing Africa has not been overcome by mass death considering that covid lockdowns and covid “mitigation” measures have contributed to the impoverishment and mass starvation on the continent. Or as Germany’s DW News puts it, “Measures put in place to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus are pushing millions of people in Africa into severe hunger.” And as Wamai notes, “[S]ome of the excess deaths in Africa “can be attributed not to the disease, but to lockdown measures that cut off access to medical care for other illnesses.”

But Africa hasn’t gotten the bloodbath that was promised, and as one Nigerian put it“They said there will be dead bodies on the streets and all that, but nothing like that happened.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/25/2021 – 05:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3rnGRwv Tyler Durden

JK Rowling Casts Anti-Doxxing Spell Against Trans Activists In Furious Twitter Thread

JK Rowling Casts Anti-Doxxing Spell Against Trans Activists In Furious Twitter Thread

Billionaire author JK Rowling has slammed transgender activists after a comedian, an actor, and a drag queen doxxed her home in Edinburgh, Scotland on the eve of Transgender Day of Remembrance.

Rowling has come under fire for her mainstream views on transgenderism, including a June 2020 joke that “‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

The author caused further seething after tweeting: “If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth.”

Rowling’s opinions have made her a bitter enemy of the transgender community, and says she’s received “so many death threats I could paper the house with them.”

She laid out the current situation in a Monday Twitter thread:

More via Twitter: 

I implore those people who retweeted the image with the address still visible, even if they did so in condemnation of these people’s actions, to delete it. Over the last few years I’ve watched, appalled, as women like Allison Bailey, Raquel Sanchez, Marion Miller, Rosie Duffield, Joanna Cherry, Julie Bindel, Rosa Freedman, Kathleen Stock and many, many others, including women who have no public profile but who’ve contacted me to relate their experiences, have been subject to campaigns of intimidation which range from being hounded on social media, the targeting of their employers, all the way up to doxing and direct threats of violence, including rape.

None of these women are protected in the way I am. They and their families have been put into a state of fear and distress for no other reason than that they refuse to uncritically accept that the socio-political concept of gender identity should replace that of sex.

I have to assume that @IAmGeorgiaFrost, @hollywstars and @Richard_Energy_ thought doxxing me would intimidate me out of speaking up for women’s sex-based rights. They should have reflected on the fact that I’ve now received so many death threats I could paper the house with them, and I haven’t stopped speaking out. Perhaps – and I’m just throwing this out there – the best way to prove your movement isn’t a threat to women, is to stop stalking, harassing and threatening us.

Rowling’s opinions have also resulted in backlash from Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe, who owes his career to her – saying in an essay that “transgender women are women.”

“Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations, who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo or I,” he wrote.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/25/2021 – 04:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3HSL1lt Tyler Durden

Brickbat: We Know Where You Live


rolodex_1161x653

Norma Garcia-Lopez, the co-chair of the Racial Equity Committee at Fort Worth Independent School District in Texas, doxxed several parents who challenged the school system’s COVID-19 mask mandate and who spoke out against critical race theory. “It’s astounding what the ‘White Privilege’ power from Tanglewood has vs. a whole diverse community that cares for the well being of others,” Garcia-Lopez wrote after a judge issued an injunction against the mask mandate. Garcia-Lopez posted the names, home addresses, and phone numbers, as well as employers and work emails of those parents. One parent said Garcia-Lopez also left a profanity-laced voicemail for her.

The post Brickbat: We Know Where You Live appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/32nfEiM
via IFTTT