Big-Shorts, Bitcoin, Bond Yields, & Black Gold All Bounce

Big-Shorts, Bitcoin, Bond Yields, & Black Gold All Bounce

After two days of bloodbathery in the most-shorted stocks, today was some relief (or a dead cat bounce)?

Source: Bloomberg

With KOSS, AMC, and BBBY all up (GME gave back most of its gains)…

Source: Bloomberg

And notably, the hedge fund VIP stocks also rose along with the most-shorted…

Source: Bloomberg

Maybe it’s time to stop ‘playing the game’ for a little bit…

The broad market was mixed with the cash open seeing selling, then a bounce back into the last hour, before another weaker close… Nasdaq was the day’s biggest laggard as Small Caps managed to hold gains…

Energy stocks continued their resurgence (after fading into the end of January); Healthcare is the laggard this week…

Source: Bloomberg

After AMZN and GOOGL earnings last night, FANG stocks opened notably higher but were sold significantly into the close…

Source: Bloomberg

KODK was the craziest stock stoday…

Treasury yields rose on the day – we suspect more of the same rate-locks and rotation into a heavy calendar, rather than any ‘growth’ unwinds…

Source: Bloomberg

The 5s30s curve soared to its steepest since 2015…

Source: Bloomberg

The Dollar ended marginally higher on the day…

Source: Bloomberg

Cryptos were all higher on the day with Ether leading the charge,

Source: Bloomberg

… breaking to a new record high above $1650

Source: Bloomberg

And Bitcoin topped $37k again…

Source: Bloomberg

Which left ETH at its highest relative to BTC since August 2018…

Source: Bloomberg

WTI surged intraday to top $56, but faded back into the close…

Silver also bounced today but remains below Friday’s close…

But gold was flat…

Finally, we note that while stocks remain at or near record highs and everyone’s excited, there appears to be much uncertainty under the covers with VIX (while down from recent spike highs) remaining almost unprecedentedly high compared to the record highs in stocks. As Bloomberg’s Elena Popina notes, it’s rare to see this VIX mismatch (high VIX and record high stocks)…

Source: Bloomberg

And implied vols are at almost unprecedented highs relative to realized vol…

Source: Bloomberg

The so-called fear gauge remains 30% above its long-term average, and the volatility curve implies elevated uncertainty for months to come.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 16:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3azJwsP Tyler Durden

US Has Extended New START Nuclear Treaty With Russia For 5 Years: Blinken

US Has Extended New START Nuclear Treaty With Russia For 5 Years: Blinken

Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced early Wednesday the US has formally agreed to extend the New START treaty with Russia for another five years.

“Extending the New START Treaty ensures we have verifiable limits on Russian ICBMs, SLBMs, and heavy bombers until February 5, 2026,” Blinken said in a statement according to Reuters.

Via Reuters

The landmark treaty, which marks the last major arms control agreement between the US and Russia, limits the number of strategic nuclear weapons maintained by the former Cold War rivals to no more than 1,550 each.

Blinken said in his statement:

Especially during times of tension, verifiable limits on Russia’s intercontinental-range nuclear weapons are vitally important. Extending the New START Treaty makes the United States, US allies and partners, and the world safer. An unconstrained competition would endanger us all.

The prior agreement was set to expire on Feb.5 and its fate was anything but certain, given that both the INF and Open Skies treaties faltered under the past US administration.

It was no secret that the Russians were waiting out Trump, anticipating that the former president’s declared desire to pull out New START would be a moot point should Biden take the White House.

During prior negotiations this past fall, Putin was willing to offer an extension on the landmark nuclear treaty of at least one year without any preconditions in order to save the deal, while at the same time Biden on the campaign was on record as clearly indicated he’d be ready to agree to an unconditional 5-year extension.

Though serious tensions remain, Biden and Putin appeared to find at least this one point of agreement during a Jan.22 phone call over a range of issues, mostly involving Biden raising the top of Russian ‘interference’ in US elections and hacking accusations.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 15:39

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/36DZzEN Tyler Durden

Prosecution Of Top Officials “Unlikely” Outcome Of Durham ‘Russiagate’ Probe, Report

Prosecution Of Top Officials “Unlikely” Outcome Of Durham ‘Russiagate’ Probe, Report

Authored by Douglass Braff via SaraACarter.com,

While Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe is generally focused on the FBI’s activities, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News the prosecution of high-ranking FBI officials, such as former Director James Comey, is “unlikely.”

In a report published Tuesday, Fox News reports that sources told the publication that the investigation is ongoing and that Durham last year concluded the part of his investigation looking into the CIA and he is now examining the FBI’s activities.

Additionally, another source told the news outlet that the special counsel had been pursuing “new and credible leads” through the end of the Trump administration, however, Fox News noted that it is unclear at this point what those lines of inquiry entail.

Moreover, a spokesperson for Durham told the outlet that they had “no comment from Mr. Durham.”

Durham’s probe is looking into the origins of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election as well as now-debunked collusion between Russian officials and the Trump campaign. Former President Donald Trump and conservatives have called Mueller’s yearlong probe a “witch hunt” and accused it of being motivated by anti-Trump animus.

Mueller’s investigation yielded no evidence that collusion occurred between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 election.

Tuesday’s report comes after the first and only criminal sentencing stemming from Durham’s investigation was issued last week.

Last Friday, Kevin Clinesmith, a former FBI lawyer, was sentenced to one year of probation and 400 hours of community service for altering an email during the Mueller’s investigation that was used as grounds for the surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Previously, Comey has said that investigators have yet to reach out to him.

“I have had no contact with him and haven’t talked to him,” the former FBI director told CBS News’ “Face the Nation” back in August. 

“I can’t imagine that I’m a target.”

Last summer, Durham’s team also questioned former CIA Director John Brennan for about eight hours at the CIA headquarters. Brennan later said through a spokesman he was assured he was “not a target,” according to Fox News.

Back in December, Brennan told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that he had no issue with Durham’s investigation extending into 2021 and also divulged briefly about the eight-hour session.

“I think that is fine, I have no problems with it,” the former CIA director said, adding that Durham’s team already talked with him for eight hours. “I do believe that John Durham is going to carry out his responsibilities ably and hopefully not with any political influence.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 15:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3rneomS Tyler Durden

Visa Says “No Reason” Why It Cannot Add Bitcoin To Its Network

Visa Says “No Reason” Why It Cannot Add Bitcoin To Its Network

If one ever wants to get the worst possible – and most incorrect – “take” in the world of finance at any given moment, one should just listen to the main who has mad an artwork of failing upward, the former Goldman, Pimco B-grade employee, failed candidate for California governor, and current Minneapolis Fed uberdovish president, Neel Kashkari who after doing everything in his power to blow the biggest asset bubble in history and enabling the price explosion in such assets as bitcoin, had the temerity to slam the cryptocurrency.

On Monday, speaking somewhere (meaning that people actually cared about his opinion), Kashkari said – without a trace of irony – that Bitcoin is “a novelty, a toy, that people speculate on.”  So… like all other assets which are terminally disconnected from fundamentals, hence bubble?

Yet while ignoring Kashkari’s “sophisticated” opinion is not only easy but mandatory in this day and age, what many missed last week when the world was transfixed by the reddit rollercoaster, is what Visa said in its earnings call, namely that the largest global payments processor is this close to adopting bitcoin

Today, 35 of the leading digital currency platforms and wallets have already chosen to issue Visa, including coin-based Crypto.com, BlackFi, Fold and BitPanda. These wallet relationships represent the potential for more than 50 million Visa credentials. The next leading network has a fraction of that. And it goes without saying, to the extent a specific digital currency becomes a recognized means of exchange, there’s no reason why we cannot add it to our network, which already supports over 160 currencies today.

As CoinTelegraph adds, during the Visa Q1 earnings call on Thursday, chairman and CEO Al Kelly devoted a portion of his comments to reaffirming the financial giant’s commitment to crypto payments and onramps, as well as explaining “how Visa thinks about crypto in general and our approach.”

The financial services firm with over $72 billion in assets as of 2019 has been aggressively pursing crypto payments as of late, including by way of partnerships enabling crypto debit cards, and investing Zap, a crypto payments startup. Additionally, earlier this month Visa was forced to abandon a $5.3 billion acquisition of payments platform Plaid on antitrust grounds.

Source: CoinTelegraph

Thursday’s comments made it clear that Visa “still has long-term plans in the sector”, according to Cointelegraph, and that the company believes itself to be in an excellent position to pursue them. As Kelly said “we believe that we are uniquely positioned to help make cryptocurrencies more safe, useful and applicable for payments,” by virtue of Visa’s size, integrations, and brand recognition.

And to demonstrate its dedication to bitcoin, this morning Visa announced that it is piloting a suite of application programming interfaces (APIs) that will allow banks to offer bitcoin services. As CoinDesk reports, the Visa Crypto APIs pilot program will let clients “easily connect into the infrastructure provided by Visa’s partner, Anchorage, a federally chartered digital asset bank, to allow their customers to buy and sell digital assets such as bitcoin as an investment within their existing consumer experiences,” Visa said in a press statement.

Visa envisions a product set that extends to other cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as well as other crypto services such as trading, Visa crypto lead Cuy Sheffield told CoinDesk in an interview. Digital bank First Boulevard is the first bank involved in the pilot; Visa has issued a wait list for other banks.

The step is a logical evolution to a company that may soon accept bitcoin as a “recognized” means of exchange: while previously, Visa had been focused on helping crypto companies issue bank cards and has partnered with 35 crypto firms to date, this is the first time the company has offered crypto services to banks.

Perhaps the only question is how much of Visa’s adoption of bitcoin – once it is officially announced – is now priced in, or alternatively, how much higher does the cryptocurrency still have to go into record territory once hybrid global bitcoin-mediated transactions via the Visa network becomes a reality.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 15:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3jguAU9 Tyler Durden

Meet The Hedge Fund That Made A Killing On The Reddit-Fueled Squeeze

Meet The Hedge Fund That Made A Killing On The Reddit-Fueled Squeeze

So much for “sticking it to the suits”.

The unfortunate reality of Wall Street is that, sooner or later, we knew that hedge fund players would emerge who capitalized on the Reddit-fueled squeezes of the last two weeks. 

One such fund was Jason Mudrick’s hedge fund. Mudrick Capital Management  made almost $200 million, fueled by stakes in names that squeezed higher during the GameStop frenzy, according to Bloomberg. His fund made 9.8% in January, one of the best months since the fund’s inception. Most of its gains came from debt and equity options in AMC and volatility bets in GameStop. 

The fund has $3.1 billion under management and booked most of its gains last week. It also sold about $50 million worth of out of the money call options on AMC, the report says. Back in September, AMC had “signed a commitment letter with Mudrick Capital that called for the hedge fund to buy $100 million of new secured bonds that pay 15% cash or 17% deferred interest,” the report notes. 

Mudrick bought AMC’s second-lien bonds for 7 to 20 cents on the dollar, before they rose to about 70 cents on the dollar last week

His firm specializes in distressed debt investments and is in the process of expanding further into Europe. It recently bought a credit hedge fund run by CVC Credit Partners. 

As we have already noted, Silver Lake also saw about $113 million in gains from converting AMC debt it was holding to stock, before selling the stock into the rally. 

Many other funds, including several of the “Tiger Cubs” weren’t so lucky, Bloomberg noted. Numerous firms with ties to Julian Robertson’s Tiger Management racked up losses during the run up:

  • Glen Kacher’s Light Street Capital Management lost 13% last month
  • Steve Mandel’s Lone Pine Capital dropped 6.4%.
  • Coatue Management ended the month little changed
  • Chase Coleman’s Tiger Global Management eked out a 1% gain
  • Rob Citrone’s Discovery Capital Management, a macro-focused fund, jumped 6.5% for the month
  • Ricky Sandler’s $7.8 billion Eminence Capital fell 10.5% last month in his hedge fund
  • Whale Rock Capital Management sunk almost 11% in its technology, media and telecommunications-focused fund
  • Marshall Wace’s $4.4 billion long-short MW Global Opportunities Fund slumped an estimated 7% in January, its worst-ever monthly decline

 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 14:46

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2MvqKuA Tyler Durden

Eastman Kodak Shares Suddenly Explode Higher On (Previously Disclosed) Microsoft Partnership Tweet

Eastman Kodak Shares Suddenly Explode Higher On (Previously Disclosed) Microsoft Partnership Tweet

Shares in Eastman Kodak have been volatile since last summer, when the Trump administration announced it would give the company a $765 million loan to start producing generic drug ingredients.

However, the craziness has returned as last week saw a massive surge (amid WSB squeezes) and subsequent collapse.

And now, following this tweet from the CEO, announcing a previously disclosed partnership…

…which really says nothing.

But was enough to send KODK exploding higher…

KODK has a 20% Short Interest-to-Float ratio, so not crazy GME high but still elevated.

Trade Accordingly.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 14:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3axp5Na Tyler Durden

“The Fed’s Monetary Punchbowl Is Fueling Rampant Home Price Appreciation”: AEI

“The Fed’s Monetary Punchbowl Is Fueling Rampant Home Price Appreciation”: AEI

Authored by Wolf Richter via WolfStreet.com,

During the press conference following the FOMC meeting last week, Fed Chair Jerome Powell was asked by different reporters about the craziness going on in the stock market, the chaotic thingy with GameStop, corporate debt, and the housing market.

The fact that he was asked several times about the exuberant nuttiness in asset prices shows that by now everyone has picked up on it. And people are increasingly incredulous that the Fed would continue with its monetary policies in face of these markets.

Powell brushed off the GameStop thingy and gave his usual it’s-not-our-fault and it’s-never-ever-our-fault justifications for the exuberant nuttiness in the markets. The near-0% interest rates and $3 trillion in QE in just a few months had nothing to do with anything, but the drivers of the nuttiness have been the “expectations about vaccines” and “fiscal policy,” he said (transcript). “Those are the news items that have been driving asset values in recent months.”

Upon hearing this, people globally were just rolling up their eyes. And a reporter challenged him softly about the housing market – the 9% surge in prices from already lofty levels. “Are you concerned about a bubble forming there yet? And is there a price increase that you’re looking at where it might change the level of mortgage-backed securities the Fed is buying?”

That price surge “we think is a passing phenomenon,” he said. “There’s a one-time thing happening with people who are spending all of their time in their house. And they’re thinking either I need a bigger house, or I need another house, and a different house. Or a second house in some cases. So there’s a one-time shift in demand that we think will get satisfied, also that will call forth supply. And we think that those price increases are unlikely to be sustained for all of those reasons.”

He said this after having said out of the other side of his mouth, “the housing sector has more than fully recovered from the downturn, supported in part by low mortgage interest rates.

And he never responded to the question about changing – reducing – the mounts of mortgage-backed securities the Fed is buying.

Quoting Powell’s “the housing sector has more than fully recovered from the downturn,” the American Enterprise Institute Housing Center said in a presentation this week that therefore “there is no justification for continuing or increasing investment in agency MBS.”

Here are some of the points of the AEI’s presentation. It demonstrates how the Fed has gone nuts with its asset purchases and interest rate repression.

Mortgage originations and refis set new records

In 2020, an all-time record $4.04 trillion in mortgages were originated. Cash-out refis shot up 55% to a new record, and no-cash-out refis shot up 185% to a new record (shaded area). This monthly chart goes through October. The AEI says that it expects November, December, and January refi counts to remain near their October levels:

“The Fed’s Monetary Punchbowl Is Fueling Rampant Home Price Appreciation”: AEI

The Fed has used its monetary policy tools, including purchasing large quantities of MBS, to push mortgage rates to record lows, though they have bounced off a tiny bit in recent weeks:

And this “monetary punchbowl is fueling rampant home price appreciation,” the AEI said. Its preliminary national Home Price Appreciation (HPA) index for December has risen to 11.0%, up from 6.0% a year earlier, “due to lower mortgage rates.” And the AEI estimates that the rate of HPA “will further accelerate over the coming months” – with the national average heading closer to 14% year-over-year:

Home price appreciation by price tier: The medium-high (yellow line) and high (blue line) price tiers, “which are more dependent on the monetary punch bowl,” are showing the strongest rates of price appreciation. “This is a trend reversal, since historically the low price tier has shown the fastest year-over-year HPA”:

“The FOMC Is Misdiagnosing Its Impact on the Housing Market.”

The AEI threw cold water on Powell’s statement that the home price surge is “a one-time shift in demand that we think will get satisfied, also that will call forth supply,” and that therefore “those price increases are unlikely to be sustained.”

Home price appreciation “is exploding, with no end in sight,” The AEI says.

In the medium-high and high price tiers – “think move-up buyers” – where prices have surged the most, the default risk is relatively low due to “minimal leverage” and the “added buying power” from work-from-home. But the “arbitrage opportunity” that the shift to work-from-home offers by moving to cheaper areas that are further out in the suburbs of the same metro or moving to a less expensive metro “will likely take many years to play out.”

Default risks are higher in the low to medium price tiers – “think first-time buyers” – since they’re “much more highly leveraged” and work-from-home is less prevalent in these income categories. And in these price tiers, “affordability continues to worsen, even in places that used to be more affordable.”

And so the AEI summarizes that “there is no justification” for the Fed to continue its purchases of mortgage-backed securities.

*  *  *

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? Using ad blockers – I totally get why – but want to support the site? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 14:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3jfxf0H Tyler Durden

WHO Experts Finally Reach Wuhan Lab At Center Of COVID-19 Origin Probe

WHO Experts Finally Reach Wuhan Lab At Center Of COVID-19 Origin Probe

After more than a year and plenty of excuses, a team of World Health Organization (WHO) experts has finally entered the lab in Wuhan, China, which has been at the center of much speculation surrounding the origins of COVID-19. 

Speculation about the virus’ origins call into question the official ‘wet market’ narrative, raising questions about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the country’s only Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4). The lab is designed to examine the world’s most dangerous pathogens and is led by virologist Shi Zhengli, known as China’s “Batwoman,” for her extensive work on bat-borne coronaviruses. 

WHO experts have had multiple opportunities to visit the Wuhan lab over the last year but chose not to. In July, we noted the WHO said it would not be visiting the lab despite having held samples of coronavirus. In August, the WHO failed to investigate the lab while it sat in Beijing for three weeks. 

While WHO experts twiddled their thumbs for more than a year – any chance of finding a smoking gun into the origins of the virus is likely gone – that means CCP officials probably wiped the lab clean. 

… and that is exactly what they did – as we reported last month, CCP officials deleted hundreds of pages of information spanning over 300 studies conducted by the lab. 

More than a year later, the show must go on. WHO experts arrived at the lab on Wednesday to conduct their investigation for the world to see. 

Peter Daszak, who is part of the WHO team and president of EcoHealth Alliance, was quoted by Financial Times as saying the team will be “asking all the questions that need to be asked” in the quest of finding the virus’ origin. 

Comprised of epidemiologists, zoologists, virologist, and public health experts, the WHO team, visited the BSL-4 in Wuhan Wednesday to piece together the complex puzzle of how the first humans were infected. 

“We’re looking forward to meeting with all the key people here and asking all the important questions that need to be asked,” Daszak told Japanese broadcaster TBS. 

According to AP News, the WHO team visited the lab and spoke with officials for three hours. The team also visited the Huanan seafood market, which is the first place CCP controlled state media said the first known cluster of infections were found in late 2019. 

It’s likely the WHO team had limited access to the BSL-4 — considering Beijing, since last summer, has pushed the narrative, completely unfounded, that the virus may have originated elsewhere.

Daszak, who CNN quoted, said he hoped his relationships with lab officials would get his team everything they need. 

“We’ve already spoken with (Shi) Zhengli, and she’s open about these things. I’m hoping that we’ll have the same level of openness and transparency,” he said.

“We could have been here a year ago doing good work,” Daszak said, adding that “we’re getting good access … all the time, we’re digging in to find out more and more information about each possible pathway.” 

Trump administration officials, especially those in the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, have suggested the virus may have been released due to a lab accident in Wuhan. Last month, it was reported former National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger said there’s “a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus.”

Meanwhile, the Biden administration has been quiet about criticizing China about the origins of the virus but has stated a “robust and clear” investigation is needed. 

Antony Blinken, US secretary of state, told MSNBC that China is “falling far short of the mark” in granting access to the international community. “That lack of transparency, that lack of being forthcoming, is a profound problem, and it’s one that continues,” he said.

CCP has been given more than a year to truly cleanse all evidence of the virus’ origin and the WHO, considering their cozy relationship with Beijing, may be able to reshape the narrative that the virus wasn’t created in a lab but rather a natural phenomenon… or at a minimum, suggest ‘results are inconclusive.’

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 14:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3tm4S5n Tyler Durden

Here Are The Best And Worst Performing Assets In January

Here Are The Best And Worst Performing Assets In January

In spite of some wild markets over the past week, January overall saw a remarkably stable start to the year for most of the assets Deutsche Bank normally covers, with just 3 of the 43 assets in the bank’s sample seeing a move of more than 5% either way last month in local currency terms. That was the lowest number to see a move of that magnitude since November 2019.

However, as DB’s Henry Allen writes, “all has not been smooth in financial markets, with a number of companies such as GameStop seeing their share prices soar as a result of traders from the Reddit forum WallStreetBets.” GameStop has been the most prominent example, seeing a +1625% rise over the last month, though others such as Blackberry (+113%), AMC Entertainment Holdings (+525%) and Express (+559%) have all  surged higher. Meanwhile bitcoin recorded a 4th consecutive monthly gain as the cryptocurrency rose a further +19.5% in January.

Oil topped the leaderboard of Deutsche’s usual monthly list, with both Brent crude (+7.9%) and WTI (+7.6%) seeing large gains over the month and climbing to their highest levels since the pandemic began. Though there’s still risks to oil prices from further lockdowns denting global economic demand, they’ve been supported thanks to reductions in supply, with Saudi Arabia announcing at the start of the month that they’d unilaterally cut output by 1 million barrels per day in February and March. This strong performance for oil comes off the back of it being one of the worst performers in 2020, when both WTI and Brent crude were down by more than -20% over the year.

At the other end of the table were European equities, particularly in southern Europe, with the Greek Athex (-7.4%) seeing the worst monthly performance in total return terms, as Spain’s IBEX 35 (-3.6%) and Italy’s FTSE MIB (-2.6%) similarly lost ground. That said, other regions’ equity markets fared noticeable better, with indices in Asia such as the Hang Seng (+3.9%), the Nikkei (+0.8%) and the Shanghai Comp (+0.3%) all posting gains on the month. US tech companies also performed well as the NASDAQ advanced +1.4%.

Another asset class that suffered in January were sovereign bonds, which fell back across multiple countries, particularly as the results of the Georgia Senate runoff in the US gave the Democrats control of the Senate and opened up the prospect of significantly larger fiscal stimulus. Indeed, US Treasuries were down -1.1%, with 10yr yields rising to their highest levels since March 2020 following the election results. Other countries saw slides as well however, with gilts (-1.7%), bunds (- 0.5%) and BTPs (-0.7%) all moving lower.

Finally in FX, the Japanese Yen has been one of the worst performers among the DM currencies, seeing its largest monthly decline against the US dollar (-1.3%) in over a year. EM currencies have also continued to struggle into the new year, with the Brazilian Real (-4.9%), Argentine Peso (-3.4%), the Russian Ruble (-2.4%) and the South African Rand (-3.1%) all weakening against the US dollar.

Finally, and unfortunately, Deutsche Bank does not track the performance of Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptos. If it did they would be blowing out all other assets in YTD performance.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 13:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3jcVAUC Tyler Durden

“Whatever It Takes To Be Prime Minister”: Will Draghi Be Italy’s Next PM, And What’s Next

“Whatever It Takes To Be Prime Minister”: Will Draghi Be Italy’s Next PM, And What’s Next

After lengthy negotiations centered on the Italian Recovery Plan for almost one month, the parties within Italy’s ruling coalition (5Star, Democratic Party and Italia Viva) failed to strike a compromise. Surprising most observers, Italy’s hardcore establishmentarian President Mattarella has moved down the route of attempting to form a Government of National Unity/Technocratic Government until such a time as elections can be held; due to the fact that a caretaker Government – i.e. Conte continuing as PM until elections – would not be able to generate plans for the recovery fund. As a reminder, to access the EU recovery fund nations must submit plans to the EU outlining how they intend to spend the funding.

Then late on Tuesday, Matarella – always working on behalf of Europe and not Italy – shocked markets when he decided to invite (at noon today, CET) former head of the ECB and Bank of Italy (and former Goldman partner) Mario Draghi to form a new government, skipping the common convention of an additional round of meetings with the parties in Parliament.

Draghi has “provisionally” accepted the invitation, i.e., pending confirmation that a sufficiently large share of the parties in Parliament will grant their support.Once this support has been secured, Draghi will face a confidence vote in both the Lower Chamber and Senate (Camera dei Deputati and Senato), possibly early next week. Although the boundaries of the new coalition are still unclear, it will likely have a larger majority in support of Draghi encompassing most of the previous ruling coalition (5Star, Democratic Party and Italia Viva) and Forza Italia led by Silvio Berlusconi.

On the policy front, Goldman expects the new government to improve the fiscal response to the Covid crisis, upgrade the implementation of the Italian Recovery Fund with some structural reforms at the margin and, finally, produce a more effective strategy on vaccination and the Italian health care system. Two main political risks weigh on the new government beyond the confidence vote: first, the fragmented composition of the 5Star movement in its attitude towards Europe – and towards Draghi; and second, the addition of Forza Italia to the coalition will increase the degree of fragmentation in the policy platform.

Meanwhile, Goldman notes that early elections remain very unlikely, especially after Mattarella made clear that their timing (at least 4 months for a new government) would be extremely challenging for the economy and risky for the containment of the pandemic (but apparently the pandemic wasn’t a problem for the US presidential elections). 

As such, Goldman expects its former employee, Draghi, to form a new government with broad support (at least initially). Of course, a downside tail risk exists if Draghi does not succeed in forming a new government. He is the “lender of last resort”in terms of institutional and political capital and, if he fails, we would expect an increase in sovereign risk, as new elections in Italy would be inevitable, and the chaos associated with Europe’s largest creditor would be back front and center.

And while Draghi is preparing to become PM, Salvini, the head of Italy’s League and still the most popular in Italy, has pushed back on this potential mandate for the simple reason that he wants to be PM himself, and continues to push for elections to take place even amid the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, his support – and perhaps by proxy the support of his allies – is unlikely to be forthcoming.

Just as ominously for Draghi’s chances, within the current coalition the response has been somewhat muted aside from a senior politician within the 5-Star party announcing they will not support a Draghi-led Government.

In other words, as Newsquawk calculates, Given the League accounts for 130 House and 63 Senate seats and the 5-Star Movement holding 190 House and 91 Senate seats the lack of support from these two parties would make it very difficult for Draghi to achieve a majority. However, given Mattarella’s continuing drive to avoid an election, it is plausible that the parties may give their support to Draghi, solely for the purpose of passing recovery fund legislation and then holding elections in full as soon as is practicable.

Economic Strength, Policy Upside and Political Risks

Notwithstanding the fragmented political landscape and the challenges of the pandemic, Draghi’s job as Prime Minister comes at a unique juncture. The high profile, and fundamentally technocratic, government he is likely to head will not have the hard task of implementing fiscal consolidation but rather the opposite. His government will need to make sure that the available fiscal support provided through the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) is employed promptly and effectively. This puts Draghi’s task on a more solid footing than any technocratic government before him in the recent past.On the policy front, the new government will have an impact on least three relevant dimensions.

  • First, it should improve the promptness of the fiscal response to the Covid crisis through a closer monitoring of its implementation.
  • Second, it will likely upgrade the structure and management of the Italian Recovery Fund by leveraging the institutional experience of the Prime Minister with the Ministry of Economics and Finance. Most importantly, Goldman expects the new Prime Minister to throw his weight behind the structural reforms of the Italian administration needed to facilitate the allocation and implementation of the European funds.
  • Finally, Goldman also sees scope for a somewhat more effective strategy on vaccination beyond the next few weeks and upgrades to the Italian health care system thanks to the ties that Draghi retains with European institutions.

As noted above, two main political risks weigh on the new government beyond the confidence vote. The first hinges on the fragmented composition of the 5Star movement. As party members and MPs are split between a pro-Europe majority and slightly Eurosceptic large minority, 5Star would see internal divisions if it grants its support to Draghi. Although the party cannot afford early elections, this support could break apart its parliamentary groups. This is important since 5Star is the largest party group in parliament (191Deputati and 92 Senators). The second risk hinges on Forza Italia, widely expected to grant its support to Draghi. This addition would nonetheless increase the degree of fragmentation in the policy platform.

Looking Beyond 2021

In past Italian technocratic governments (e.g., the government led by Senator Monti) even the strongest political support in Parliament can fade away in a very short time and bolster support for Eurosceptic parties. While the size of this risk depends on how effective the government is in addressing the country’s needs, political parties in Parliament will focus on the reform of the electoral system towards proportional representation. This change, if successful and timely, should reduce the degree of political volatility even if the country were to go to early elections.

Beyond 2021, the election of the President of the Republic in February 2022 will provide a structural break. There is no limitation to the possibility that the Prime Minister is elected President, although this is something that has never happened in the past. Nonetheless, if Draghi were to be elected as President, his resignation from his role as Prime Minister could trigger a political crisis similar to the current one and, possibly, early elections. Alternatively, also depending on Draghi’s intentions, the Parliament might take some time to identify an alternative candidate, further increasing the degree of political conflict.

Draghi as the (Political) “Lender of Last Resort” or “Whatever it takes to be a Prime Minister”

In Goldman’s view, early elections remain very unlikely, especially after President Mattarella made clear that their timing would be extremely challenging for the economy and risky for the containment of the pandemic.Still, a downside tail risk exists if Draghi does not succeed in forming a new government. Because of his personal standing, Draghi is seen as the “lender of last resort” of institutional and political capital to the country. It is therefore hard to envision who could succeed to form an effective government if he fails, and Goldman expects a notable increase in sovereign risk in this scenario.

Market Reaction

The euor was relatively muted given the USD’s continued hold of the 91.00 figure in DXY terms. Mar’21 BTPs saw a considerable gap-up this morning to eclipse the 152.00 mark, with Italian yields sliding.

In the equity space, the FTSE MIB is the outperformer with gains of around 3.0% (Euro Stoxx 50 +0.7%) as domestic markets cheer the potential return of Draghi.

The BTP-Bund yield spread has narrowed somewhat from recent levels, currently around the 105bp mark when compared with yesterday’s ~115bp print. On this reaction, SGH Macro highlight that the relatively contained reaction in the yield spread is due to both the ECB purchase program and perhaps, as indicated by sources, to the expectation that the European Commission will fully utilize the enforcement mechanisms with the recovery fund. Therefore, Italy will have no choice but to stick to a prudent and responsible fiscal plan, irrespective of who is the PM, in order to access this funding.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/03/2021 – 13:38

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2MuWnV7 Tyler Durden