Photos Of Jeffrey Epstein’s NYC Mansion From 2019 FBI Raid Are Inadmissible In Maxwell Trial, Judge Rules

Photos Of Jeffrey Epstein’s NYC Mansion From 2019 FBI Raid Are Inadmissible In Maxwell Trial, Judge Rules

FBI photos from Jeffrey Epstein’s New York City mansion are being kept out of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial in what is being called a “setback” for prosecutors 

After the rulings, Maxwell appeared “elated” at the end of court for the day. She was “smiling with her arm around one of her attorneys, Bobbi Sternheim,” according to the Miami Herald

Last Friday the defense made the argument that the jury should not be allowed to see the “lurid” photos that were taken during a 2019 raid of Epstein’s mansion.

Among the photos were “images of framed pictures in his home that showed a partially clad prepubescent girl,” the report said. 

The prosecution claimed the photos were “evidence of Jeffrey Epstein’s lifestyle” that “contradicts the public persona presented by the defense.”

While Judge Alison Nathan allowed two similar photos from Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion into evidence, she didn’t allow the New York City photos in question to be used. Nathan said prosecutors didn’t reason as to how photos from 2019 were relevant to a crime that took place 25 years ago. She also said prosecutors didn’t explain “what they had to do with Maxwell”.

On top of the photographs, the prosecution revealed on Friday that the FBI “also found a bag of ‘very small’ schoolgirl costumes near Epstein’s massage room.”

Recall, we have been publishing developments in testimony during the trial as they occur.

Maxwell, we wrote in late November, has reportedly not been enjoying her stay in prison as the trial unfolds. 

Maxwell’s lawyers have complained that she is “suffering weight loss, hair loss and failing eyesight because of her time in jail,” the report says. 

Her lawyers have compared her incarceration to that of “Dr. Hannibal Lecter’s incarceration” as a result of Feds trying to make up for the “incompetence” in handling Jeffrey Epstein’s incarceration. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 12:18

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3DB3uzI Tyler Durden

Facebook, Amazon, Venmo Down As AWS Outage Hits Thousands

Facebook, Amazon, Venmo Down As AWS Outage Hits Thousands

Earlier in the day Merrill was down, then Vanguard and Robinhood, and now a slew of even more widely used websites are suffering widespread outages….

Source: DownDetector

The central factor driving the outages appears to be Amazon Web Services:

But AWS now says it identified the root cause of the earlier outage and is actively working towards recovery:

8:22 AM PST We are investigating increased error rates for the AWS Management Console.

8:26 AM PST We are experiencing API and console issues in the US-EAST-1 Region. We have identified root cause and we are actively working towards recovery. This issue is affecting the global console landing page, which is also hosted in US-EAST-1. Customers may be able to access region-specific consoles going to https://console.aws.amazon.com/. So, to access the US-WEST-2 console, try https://us-west-2.console.aws.amazon.com/

Developing…

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 11:56

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3IwXyf4 Tyler Durden

California Is Addicted To Oil From The Amazon

California Is Addicted To Oil From The Amazon

Authored by Irina Slav via OilPrice.com,

California is by far the most ambitious U.S. state when it comes to things like emission standards, EV sales, and renewable energy. California is shutting down its nuclear power plants to double down on wind and solar. 

It is also importing more oil from the Amazon rainforest than any country in the world.

Ecuador accounted for a little over 24 percent of California’s oil imports as of 2020. That equaled 55,219 barrels daily, according to the California Energy Commission. Interestingly, this is a substantial increase from the previous year, when Ecuador accounted for 18.22 percent of California’s oil imports, and from the year before, when Ecuador accounted for 14 percent.

This oil from Ecuador, according to a recent investigation by NBC News, comes from the Amazon rainforest—an area that is the target of massive conservation efforts and yet remains one of the most exploited parts of the world because of its natural resource wealth.

Ecuador is home to the Yasuni National Park, which contains some of the most diverse ecosystems globally, including two uncontacted indigenous tribes. For these tribes, the government even approved a so-called Intangible Zone—a border not to be crossed in order to protect these tribes. But that was before 2019. Two years ago, the government of Ecuador approved a plan to open up Yasuni National Park to oil and gas drilling.

Ecuador is a frequent reference in oil news, but the South American country has proven crude reserves estimated at 8.3 billion barrels, which makes it the third-largest oil country in Latin America, after Venezuela and Brazil. Yet, it doesn’t produce anywhere close to what Brazil pumps and what Venezuela did before the U.S. sanctions. Its average for 2020 was 483,000 bpd, according to the Energy Information Administration. But this is changing.

The president of the tiny South American nation, who took office this May, pledged to double the country’s oil production and is working on this through some major reforms aimed at facilitating the participation of private companies in Ecuador’s oil industry. According to Argus Media, the rush aims to monetize the country’s oil assets before the energy transition kills demand for the fossil fuel. Yet judging from California’s appetite for Ecuadorian oil, this killing might take a while.

According to the NBC investigation, which was based on a report by Stand.earth and Amazon Watch, 66 percent of the oil produced in Ecuador is exported to the United States, and most of that ends up in California. As the two environmentalist groups put it, 1 in 7 tanks of gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel sold in California came from the Amazon rainforest. And that’s not all.

Some of the biggest corporate users of Amazon oil in California are PepsiCo, Costco, and Amazon. All three have made emission-related pledges, with PepsiCo vowing to reduce absolute greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent from 2015 levels by 2030 and net-zero status by 2040 and Amazon promising billions in investment to become a net-zero emitter by the same year.

“This is no longer one of those things where we’re supposed to have sympathy for a crisis that’s happening somewhere else,” Angeline Robertson, a senior researcher at Stand.earth and the lead author of the report, told NBC.

“It’s occurring in California, and it’s linked to Amazon destruction.”

It is also the latest proof that moving away from oil and gas is a lot easier said than done. For all of its anti-oil rhetoric, California is a major importer of the commodity. Before Ecuador became its top source of the commodity, it was importing most of its oil from Saudi Arabia and Iraq and smaller amounts from Colombia, Mexico, Nigeria, and Angola. California, therefore, is very much like any other oil importer in the world with one difference: while other importers simply do not have the domestic production to use, California is purposefully squeezing its oil industry.

There are plans in place to ban fracking by 2024, with Governor Newsom saying in May that “As we move to swiftly decarbonize our transportation sector and create a healthier future for our children, I’ve made it clear I don’t see a role for fracking in that future and, similarly, believe that California needs to move beyond oil.”

This move would necessitate weaning the state off the more than 200,000 bpd of foreign oil it imports on top of more than 460,000 bpd in local production. It’s going to be difficult. There is also a proposal to ban offshore drilling after an oil spill in October added fuel to arguments about whether oil had a future in California or not.

In Ecuador and in the Yasuni National Park, oil definitely has a future, unlike an attempt by a previous government to save its unique ecosystems by calling on the international community to provide $3.5 billion for conservation efforts. NBC recalls the government of Rafael Correa abandoned its plan to protect its share of the Amazon six years with international donations after it only managed to raise a tenth of what was needed. And then it lifted the drilling moratorium for Yasuni, with President Correa saying, “The world has failed us.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 11:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3owP7IH Tyler Durden

Elon Musk Praises China, Pumps Neuralink And Cybertruck, At WSJ CEO Summit Event

Elon Musk Praises China, Pumps Neuralink And Cybertruck, At WSJ CEO Summit Event

Elon Musk took center stage at the Wall Street Journal CEO Council Summit this week, where he answered questions about Tesla, Neuralink, SpaceX and, most notably, took the time to once again praise China.

We have noted numerous times in the past that Musk has a propensity for praising China at every given opportunity. 

Things were no different during the WSJ event, where Musk predicted that China’s economy could “exceed two or three times that of the United States” in coming years.

“It’s a different world,” Musk said of China. Musk stressed that China is still adjusting to becoming an emerging power, telling the WSJ: “There are a lot of people in the government in China who kind of grew up…with China being a small economy and maybe who feel like China was pushed around a lot. They haven’t fully appreciated the fact that China really is going to be the big kid on the block.”

Flexing more of his geopolitical analysis muscle, Musk then said: “If you’re going to be the big kid on the block, then you really need to be pretty chill about things.”

Perhaps trying to walk back some of his enthusiasm for the CCP, Musk then said: “It is not my intention support everything China does more than, say, would support anything the United States or any other country does…we are moving into an interesting new world and we must remember that we are all human.”

On top of that, Musk commented that Tesla’s coming (supposedly) Cybertruck may be the company’s best product ever, while at the same time he potentially alluded to further delays: “It has a lot of new technology, so it’s hard to make. But it will be awesome.”

Finally, Musk lamented how much time being Tesla CEO takes up, perhaps another nod to him eventually moving on from his role at the auto company: “The sheer amount of work required to be CEO of Tesla is insane. It would be nice to have a bit more free time on my hands as opposed to just working day and night from when I wake up to go to sleep seven days a week. It’s pretty intense.”

Musk also commented that SpaceX’s Starship rocket is currently occupying “more of his mental focus” than anything else. “This is the biggest rocket ever made” he told the WSJ. He also added that he hoped his venture in Neuralink would eventually help people walk again.

The full interview can be viewed here:

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 11:28

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3DAUY3I Tyler Durden

Five Inflation Myths

Five Inflation Myths

Authored by Michael Maharrey via SchiffGold.com,

Inflation is running rampant. At first, the powers that be tried to convince us it wasn’t a problem because it was just a temporary phenomenon caused by coronavirus. (As if a virus could cause the money supply to increase.) But now, the transitory inflation narrative is dead. Jerome Powell recently admitted that it’s time to “retire” that word. The new strategy seems to be to try to convince you that rising prices are “good for you” and the broader economy. You can decide for yourself the veracity of that argument.

The truth is the federal government needs inflation. It depends on Federal Reserve money printing to support its borrow and spend budgeting strategy. Without the Fed’s inflationary activity, the government couldn’t finance its out-of-control spending habit. But politicians don’t want you to know that they are levying an inflation tax on you, so they perpetuate all kinds of myths about inflation to try to make you feel better about it.

Following are five inflation myths heard in the mainstream media of late. I owe a hat-tip to Thomas Anderson. He compiled most of these myths and published them in the Facebook group Passant Gardant.

Myth 1 – Inflation Is Simply Rising Prices

This myth effectively redefines inflation. When analysts, politicians and pundits talk about inflation, they usually mean rising consumer prices as measured by the consumer price index (CPI). But this is a symptom of inflation. Inflation itself is an increase in the money supply.

If the money supply increases and the number of goods and services remain relatively stable, you have more dollars chasing the same amount of stuff. That means prices rise as consumers bid up the limited amount of stuff with their extra dollars.

In a nutshell, rising prices are not in-and-of-themselves inflation. They are caused by inflation.

The government altered the definition to suit its purposes. The conventional definition you hear today is nothing more than government propaganda. It is a way to hide its responsibility for rising prices, and this redefining of the word makes these other myths possible.

Myth 2 – Rising Wages Cause Inflation

You don’t have to worry about inflation. Prices are just rising because your wages are going up. Wage pressure is causing inflation.

This myth has it completely backward. Rising wages are a sign of inflation, not a cause. After all, a wage is simply a price – the price of labor. And as already explained, rising prices are a symptom of inflation.

Wages do rise in an inflationary environment, but they typically lag behind the prices of goods and services. Today, the official CPI is close to 6%. Average hourly earnings are only up 4.8%.

Even if you accept the mainstream definition of inflation, this myth is nothing but a tautology. In effect, you’re saying rising prices are causing rising prices. As Anderson said, this has no explanatory power.

Myth 3 – Inflation Is Caused by High Oil Prices

Oil prices have spiked significantly this year. And rising energy prices do trickle through the economy. When energy costs are high, it raises the cost of production and transportation, and thus, the cost of goods.

But again, an example of inflation can’t cause inflation. High prices don’t cause high prices. The question you need to ask is why has the price of oil gone up along with the price of everything else?

Sure, there are some Biden administration policies that have put price pressure on oil. And there are supply and demand dynamics. But you have to dig further to find the root cause when you see a general increase in prices across the board. It’s the expansion of the money supply. As Milton Friedman put it, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.”

Myth 4 – Economic Growth Causes Inflation and That’s Good!

As Anderson put it, “this is a pernicious lie told by politicians and central bankers who don’t want to take heat for high inflation.”

In reality, true economic growth tends to push prices down. As productivity increases and technology advances, companies can produce more for less. Prices fall. Economic growth increases the number of available goods and services. This has a deflationary effect – not inflationary. Just look at prices in high growth sectors compared to low growth sectors. The prices of computers, smartphones, home entertainment, and other high-growth sectors have dropped significantly over the last few decades. Meanwhile, stagnating sectors such as education, energy, healthcare, and food have seen consistently increasing prices.

Again, general price inflation happens when you have more dollars chasing the same amount of (or less) stuff. This is exactly what happened during the pandemic. Production came to a halt as governments shut down economies. Meanwhile, the Fed printed trillions of dollars out of thin air and the federal government showered them on consumers. Americans stopped producing but kept spending. That’s more dollars chasing less stuff.

And this is not good for you. When the prices of all goods and services increase, that translates into a higher cost of living and lower quality of life for everyone.

Myth 5 – Low Interest Rates Cause Inflation

This is getting closer to the truth, but it’s not quite there.

Interest rates are the price of money. (This is simplifying things significantly. Time is also a factor in interest rates. But this simple explanation works for our purposes.) More specifically, in the monetary system, interest rates are the price of credit. In a market free from government and central bank manipulation, interest rates will rise and fall based on the demand for money. When people want to spend and there is high demand for credit, interest rates will rise. This will discourage lending and encourage savings. If there is a glut of savings, interest rates will fall. This incentivizes borrowing and disincentivizes savings. In a free market, interest rates will find their own equilibrium and adjust along with the economy.

Here’s the catch – we don’t live in a world free from government and central bank manipulation of interest rates. The Federal Reserve tinkers with rates to “stimulate” the economy in times of crisis. Artificially low interest rates do contribute to inflation. They incentivize excessive borrowing. In a fractional reserve banking system, this means money creation. And as we know, an increase in the money supply is the true definition of inflation.

This leads to misallocations of resources and distortions in the economy. And, of course, rising prices.

Conclusion

All of these myths are perpetrated to fool you into thinking inflation is not really a problem, and even if it is, there’s not really anything anybody can do about it. This is the ultimate myth. There is something the government and central bank can do about it – quit creating money out of thin air.

Here is the inflation truth – a general increase in prices is always caused by an increase in the supply of money relative to the number of goods and services available in the economy.

Don’t fall for the myths!

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 11:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3IvkECL Tyler Durden

European Gas Jumps As Biden Weighs Sanctions If Putin Invades Ukraine

European Gas Jumps As Biden Weighs Sanctions If Putin Invades Ukraine

On Tuesday, European natural gas futures jumped after U.S. and European allies weighed new sanctions against Russia if it should invade Ukraine. Cold weather is not the only driver of natgas prices but also geopolitical instability in the region has helped push prices near 100 euros per megawatt-hour. 

According to Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter, the U.S. and European allies could hit Moscow with sanctions that would paralyze its ability to convert rubles for dollars and other foreign currencies if an invasion of Ukraine was seen early next year. 

President Joe Biden and President Vladimir Putin are expected to speak Tuesday. People familiar with the upcoming meeting said Biden will outline various types of sanctions the US could use if Putin were to invade Ukraine.

Rising tensions between the US/EU and Russia come as U.S. intelligence has warned as many as 175,000 Russian troops are assembling on the Ukraine border. Moscow denied invasion plans but warned Western countries to scale back support for Ukraine. 

Any action or proposed action against Russia or its energy industry has pushed natgas prices across Europe higher. Weeks ago, German regulators suspended the application process for Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Then the US sanctioned companies related to the pipeline’s construction. 

After the fresh talks of sanctions, Dutch month-ahead gas, the European benchmark, rose 7% to 96.295 euros, nearing the 100 euro breakout level. 

Prices have slumped since early October records (116 euros), but some expect with a La Nina cold season that has brought unseasonably frigid weather to continental Europe and the Nordic region, along with low natgas storages levels (currently at 66%, compared with the five-year average of 82% for this time of year), prices could continue rising as geopolitics becomes another upside driver. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 10:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3lKHOLo Tyler Durden

Dow Erases All Post-Thanksgiving Omicron/Powell Losses As Melt-Up Accelerates

Dow Erases All Post-Thanksgiving Omicron/Powell Losses As Melt-Up Accelerates

The massive short-squeeze continues with “Most Shorted” stocks now up almost 9% from yesterday’s post-open plunge lows…

Source: Bloomberg

That sparked a near-vertical ramp at the cash open today…

And has lifted all the majors with The Dow managing to get back to even from Thanksgiving…

Interestingly, the ramp appears to have stalled at that level. And also, Small Caps have ramped perfectly to their 100- and 200-DMA and stalled…

Is the squeeze running out of ammo?

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 10:36

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3EEWaVm Tyler Durden

Don’t Forget The X-Date

Don’t Forget The X-Date

By Philip Marey, Rabobank US strategist

Stock markets rebounded yesterday, as the fear of the Omicron variant subsided somewhat. The S&P500 gained 1.2% and the Euro Stoxx 50 rose by 1.4%. This morning, Asia-Pacific stock markets are mostly up. Meanwhile, the 10 year US treasury yield has rebounded to 1.45% after reaching a trough at 1.33% on Friday.

Meanwhile, we could be only a week from the X-date, the date at which the US federal government may no longer be able to pay its bills. Remember that the debt limit was raised to $28.88 trillion in October, after the Republicans blinked. As we explained in Biden’s Game of Chicken, the Democrats want to share responsibility for raising the debt ceiling with the Republicans. Although the Democrats can still easily raise the debt ceiling through budget reconciliation, they do not want the electoral vulnerability that comes with a unilateral increase in the debt limit. Instead of calling the Democrats’ bluff, Senate Minority Leader McConnell blinked in October and delivered the Republican votes for a temporary increase in the debt ceiling. While he claimed this was a one time deal, the Democrats are still counting on him to blink again. The raise in October has only delayed the X-date. According to the Treasury’s most recent estimate, the extraordinary measures to prevent a default could be exhausted as soon as by December 15.

But first the Democrats are trying to attach the debt limit to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which sets priorities and policy for the fiscal year, which started on October 1. Without this bill military construction projects will be delayed, at a time when the Chinese are building ports around the world. A House vote on a compromise bill between the leadership in the House and the Senate is expected as early as this week. While Democrats are trying to attach the debt limit to this bill, House Minority Leader McCarthy has said he opposed it.

If we reach the X-date before the debt limit is raised, the federal government will be in default. However, it is very difficult to forecast the X-date, especially in COVID times. The Treasury Department’s most recent estimate is that it could be as soon as 15 December. However, in an earlier letter, Yellen mentioned December 3 as the X-date.

Other organizations put the X-date somewhere between mid-December and mid-February. If McCarthy manages to prevent a raise in the debt ceiling through attachment to the NDAA, the pressure will be on McConnell again. If he does not blink, the Democrats still have the possibility to include it in the reconciliation bill (Build Back Better), which is also on the political agenda this month.

After the Build Back Better bill passed the House of Representatives on November 19, it has moved to the Senate. There, the Democrats cannot afford to lose a single vote. This means that Senators Manchin and Sinema are the power brokers again. A simple majority suffices because the Democrats are using the budget reconciliation procedure to pass the bill. If the Senate amends the House bill, it will be sent back there for reconsideration. Three items at risk are paid leave, SALT (state and local taxes) deductions, and immigrant protection. Manchin thinks paid leave should be removed from the bill. The SALT provisions are also controversial to some centrist Democratic senators. The House bill raises the $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes to $80,000. However, without an income limit this could lead to tax cuts for high income households. In fact, this item was mentioned by Jared Golden – the only Democrat who voted against the bill in the House –  as his main reason to vote against the House bill. He thinks the bill’s SALT provision amounts to “tax giveaways to millionaires.” Finally, the temporary legal protections for illegal immigrants could be rejected by the Senate parliamentarian for inclusion in the reconciliation procedure. In this case, the Democrats would have to remove them from the bill. So there are still several steps to be taken. As the year comes to an end, President Biden has yet to sign his signature bill into law

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 10:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3pCLJLo Tyler Durden

Quid iPhone Pro Quo: Apple Signed Secret $275 Billion Deal With Chinese Government

Quid iPhone Pro Quo: Apple Signed Secret $275 Billion Deal With Chinese Government

Investors and journalists have been openly questioning whether Apple CEO Tim Cook, once praised for his deep-rooted connections within the CCP, has allowed his relationships in China to sour as the US has stepped up criticisms over human rights – treatment of the Uyghers in Xinjiang and elsewhere – and Taiwan. These ties have grown intensely controversial, eliciting criticism from lawmakers, rivals and even the company’s own employees.

And just as the SEC prepares to boot dozens of Chinese companies off of US stock exchanges for refusing to comply with US audit standards (something the CCP has expressly forbidden under the auspices of data privacy), reporters with the Information have just published a bombshell: At some point in the not-too-distant past, Cook struck a $275 billion deal with the Chinese government while facing pressure from the CCP.

The deal emerged after a series of meetings between Cook and Chinese officials back in 2016.

China is Apple’s second-biggest market after the US, and has long been targeted as a critical market for growth. Apple’s iPhones have seen growing popularity despite rising tensions with the US. This year, Apple became the second-biggest smartphone maker in China.

The deal, which was forged over the span of years, represents a five-year plan, according to documents from inside Apple that have been seen by the Information. Whether talks on another five-year plan are in the works isn’t yet clear.

The fact that Apple never disclosed this deal to the US – it’s only just now being publicied – will likely trigger an angry response from lawmakers, who are bound to  question Apple’s loyalty to the US, along with whether it prioritized profits and growth over respecting human rights (so much for all that climate virtue signaling).

Before the deal was struck, documents show, Apple executives were scrambling to salvage their relationship with Chinese officials, who had accused Apple of not contributing enough to the local economy. Amid the government crackdown and the bad publicity that accompanied it, iPhone sales plummeted, though they have since bounced back.

Just the other day, word leaked that Apple was warning suppliers that demand for its latest batch of iPhones appears to be more subdued than anticipated.

Apple’s shares have bounced back from a brief dip following AAPL’s latest earnings report published back in October – earnings that showed still-robust growth in greater China despite the pandemic, supply crunches, tariffs and the intensifying backlash against the US and American companies.

We can’t help but wonder: was this deal essentially a big bribe paid by Apple to the Chinese? And if so, could the company potentially be vulnerable to prosecution under the FCPA? Furthermore, does this mean Tim Cook is Communist Beijing’s favorite American businessman?

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 10:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3DDKHUI Tyler Durden

Cathie Wood Readies Her 9th ETF For Launch This Week, Despite ARKK’s Recent Plunge

Cathie Wood Readies Her 9th ETF For Launch This Week, Despite ARKK’s Recent Plunge

While the wheels are in the midst of coming off of her “flagship” ARKK Innovation Fund, Cathie Wood is apparently readying her latest new venture for launch: yet another fund.

Wood is working on launching the ARK Transparency ETF (ticker CTRU), which will launch Wednesday of this week and mark Wood’s 9th ETF and the third to track an index, according to Yahoo

The launch comes while Wood’s flagship fund, as many have pointed out, is falling behind major index benchmarks at a dizzying rate, despite the success of Tesla over the last year. 

ARKK just had its worst week since February, according to Yahoo, falling about 12% in the last 5 trading days. 

CTRU has set the goal of tapping into investor appetite for ESG investments. The fund will follow an index that excludes alcohol, banking, gambling and oil and gas, the report said. 

Todd Rosenbluth, head of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA said of the new launch: “Sentiment toward ARK has started to shift as thematic funds like ARKK and siblings have struggled to repeat its performance success in 2021. We expect the ETF to still garner some interest as ARK still has a strong ETF brand and it provides exposure to a new approach that could complement ARKK.”

We noted back in September that despite the supposed focus on virtue signaling (we’re guessing that’s why Wood is excluding gambling and oil and gas), Wood still has massive exposure to names like DraftKings elsewhere and will be including companies like Apple and Nike – notorious for their labor practices – in the latest ETF offering.

The inclusion of these names hasn’t stopped Wood from trying to position this ETF as some type of pious pathway into the world of investing.

Friend of Zero Hedge and Bloomberg ETF expert Eric Balchunas said earlier this year: “This is kind of Ark’s version of ESG. It’s intriguing because it doesn’t have a moralizing vibe to it, it’s like they’re saying if you go after transparency, you’re probably going to buy good companies.”

The question of Wood is spreading herself too thin could start to come up if her funds can’t continue to perform. This ETF marks the second ETF launch for ARK this year, despite the firm’s “flagship” ARKK fund getting walloped by 11% over the last week and underperforming the S&P by more than 30% this year. 

“An index-based ESG ETF doesn’t necessarily scream ‘disruptive innovation,’ which ARK has branded themselves around,” Nate Geraci, president of the ETF Store, said back in September.

And of course, what would the launch of a new ETF be without the TV appearances to go with it? Expect to see Wood taking every opportunity to shill her latest “actively managed” product on Bloomberg and CNBC in coming weeks. We’ll have the “mute” button ready…

Tyler Durden
Tue, 12/07/2021 – 09:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/33cvmxT Tyler Durden