“Russia Could Ditch Dollar In 2-3 Years”; Deputy PM Warns Nuclear Subs “Could Reach Any Country On Any Continent”

"Two to three years is enough, not only to launch [settlements in rubles], but also to complete these mechanisms," says Andrey Kostin, head of Russia’s second-biggest bank VTB, noting that the possibility of the US and EU widening sanctions to exclude Russia from the SWIFT global money transfer system would become “a point of no return” making any further dialog impossible. However, as Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin explains in this interview, how Russia's military and industrial complex is responding to a growing threat from America. Russia is not responding with any talk about the nuclear button (at least not yet); but they are preparing for such an eventuality: "we are creating a nuclear submarine fleet… capable of reaching any country on any continent, if [USA] suddenly becomes the aggressor, and our top-most national interests come under threat," adding that Obama's coup has ushered in "the complete demise of the Ukrainian State."

 

As RT reports, ?two to three years would be enough time for Russia to switch to international settlements to the ruble, Andrey Kostin, head of Russia’s second-biggest bank VTB, said…

The media has reported on the possibility of the US and EU widening sanctions to exclude Russia from the SWIFT global money transfer system.

 

Kostin said the move would become “a point of no return” and that any further dialogue would be impossible if SWIFT was cut off.

 

“If you look at Iran’s experience, shutting down SWIFT only happens when all relations; political, economic, cultural, even diplomatic, break down,” the VTB boss said.

 

“I don’t know how [Western] banks could block SWIFT and then expect cooperation in the fight against terrorism and nuclear disarmament.”

 

However, replacing SWIFT within Russia won’t be difficult, Kostin said.

 

“We have a [similar] system at the Central Bank of Russia and others. The Central Bank has tested this system, and we can switch to it at any moment.”

But away from the specifics, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin explains Russia's Military and Industrial plans in this extensive interview… (via Eric Zuesse)

The Floridian blogger about Russia, "Vineyard of the Saker," posted an English translation on September 29th of an informative interview on Russian television.

 

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin, who has Russia's military portfolio, was addressing his nation's public, September 22nd, on Rossiya TV, and he explained how his country is responding to the threat of America's intending to place its nuclear missiles on Russia's border, inside Ukraine (much as the USSR had done in Cuba to America during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis). Russia is not responding with any talk about the nuclear button; at least not yet. There is still time enough to avoid anything so urgent as that. But they are preparing for such an eventuality. (8:50) "We are creating a nuclear submarine fleet … capable of reaching any country on any continent, if it suddenly becomes the aggressor and our topmost national interests come under threat."

Obama has started clearly in that direction, with his February 2014 Ukrainian coup d'etat installing a U.S.-allied Ukrainian Government to replace the former (and democratically elected) Russian-allied one; and Russia takes Obama's threat seriously; so, Russia is now rapidly updating its nuclear and other arsenals, and is offering technologically advanced military designers from all over the world extremely favorable terms for becoming Russian citizens.

Rogozin also says that (9:23), "by now, we have updated almost the entire fleet of strategic bombers."

All of the military parts and products that were formerly being manufactured in Ukraine, have been switched to Russian factories instead. Now (10:48), "Everything is produced in Russia." He says that many of Ukraine's top military designers have already moved to Russia, and that most of the others are desperate to leave Ukraine.

He comments (12:31), "For Ukraine, it is the end. It is a complete demise of the Ukrainian state as an industrial country. Nobody wants their products in the West because they are outdated, and they [the West] have their own manufacturers. What they [Ukraine] are doing right now is suicide. … I say this with great regret. I'll tell you one thing: we still had hope at the end of last year [before Obama's coup] that we would be able to remedy the situation [that it wouldn't happen]."

He says: (14:21), "On 21st of February, when a coup was staged, I had to fly to Kiev on behalf of The President [Putin]. [But] I stopped the car at the entrance to the airport, because it was clear that Ukraine was finished" as a manufacturing economy.

He sees manufacturing as the basis for a sound economy. (14:48) "Today, the only choice for them [Ukrainians] is to go into retail trade. But I think they also have another choice: to move to Russia." So: Putin is looking to build Russia's economy on a manufacturing basis, perhaps like China has done.

Rogozin repeatedly invites weapons-designers from around the world to move to Russia. Perhaps Putin takes as his inspiration what happened to the U.S. economy after our country, under President FDR in the 1940s, responded to the fascist threat by means of massive support to military R&D and manufacturing. Perhaps Putin hopes that Russia will become the new America, maybe that Putin will become the new FDR.

The interviewer responds (15:52) "What a strange story is unfolding." And Rogozin continues, "From now on, we will be gathering the best experts in the world." So: that (which also happened under FDR, and continued under Truman) is, indeed, their intention.

As if intending to make his point absolutely clear, he continues: "The Americans used to 'suck out' the best brains from around the world, … now we are reversing this process."

Discussing France's having gone along with Obama to stop production of France's Mistral aircraft-carrier ships to the Russian Navy, he says (20:45), "The money [from us] is paid, which means that they have to return it with penalties. And … France is losing not just money, but their reputation as a reliable supplier."

Then, starting at 22:32, he notes that when he first entered the Government (which was at around the time that Putin first became President), he noticed that "our individual businesses preferred to buy micro-electronics in the West," and that they would need "to start the production, in Russia, of all that is necessary." He says "We have already given the necessary instructions" to do precisely that. Obama's action in Ukraine seems to have spurred Russia to do this. Yet again, it is like America during WWII.

He continues immediately to add: "However, what we cannot, or do not have the time to make, we can get in other countries who are in trading partnership with us," mainly the "BRIC" or rapidly industrializing countries, with whom Putin has been building a trading-bloc.

The discussion then goes on to whether building Russia's manufacturing base upon the making of weapons is a sound idea, and Rogozin says (24:34) that among Putin's advisors, "we try not to argue publicly, but on the inside it is all boiling."

He says that Russia's high interest-rates are a great problem for developing manufactures. He makes a stunning admission (24:53): "They [America] are in a much more favorable position, no sanctions, no one prevents them from working; the banking policy [Federal Reserve] supports the industry. We do not have any of this. We are not going to now discuss the reasons why, but those are the facts. This is why the government now is making a decision to compensate for the [high] interest rate for enterprises in the military-industrial complex." Russian sovereign debt will probably soar.

However, Putin has decided "to develop a program to transfer technology from the defense [sector] into civil" manufacturing, so as to reduce the extra economic burden on them. The real hardship, apparently, will go to Russia's consumers. But, then, after the military-manufacturing sector gets humming, "they should be ready to produce similar high-tech products for the civil industry," including, "metallurgy, electronics, composite materials, and much much more."

Secondly, (27:06), "Today, they [Russian manufacturers] have defence contracts, tomorrow they might have less. They need a safety net — supplies for the civil market." It would, yet again, be very much in the mold of FDR, and of Harry S. Truman.

Perhaps Russia is now learning the lesson that America has now forgotten. Maybe Obama's America will become a spur to Russia — like Hitler, Tojo, and Mussolini, became spurs to America, in a time that America, evidently, has indeed forgotten, and in which we have become, eerily, the other side.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nHmiG5 Tyler Durden

"Russia Could Ditch Dollar In 2-3 Years"; Deputy PM Warns Nuclear Subs "Could Reach Any Country On Any Continent"

"Two to three years is enough, not only to launch [settlements in rubles], but also to complete these mechanisms," says Andrey Kostin, head of Russia’s second-biggest bank VTB, noting that the possibility of the US and EU widening sanctions to exclude Russia from the SWIFT global money transfer system would become “a point of no return” making any further dialog impossible. However, as Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin explains in this interview, how Russia's military and industrial complex is responding to a growing threat from America. Russia is not responding with any talk about the nuclear button (at least not yet); but they are preparing for such an eventuality: "we are creating a nuclear submarine fleet… capable of reaching any country on any continent, if [USA] suddenly becomes the aggressor, and our top-most national interests come under threat," adding that Obama's coup has ushered in "the complete demise of the Ukrainian State."

 

As RT reports, ?two to three years would be enough time for Russia to switch to international settlements to the ruble, Andrey Kostin, head of Russia’s second-biggest bank VTB, said…

The media has reported on the possibility of the US and EU widening sanctions to exclude Russia from the SWIFT global money transfer system.

 

Kostin said the move would become “a point of no return” and that any further dialogue would be impossible if SWIFT was cut off.

 

“If you look at Iran’s experience, shutting down SWIFT only happens when all relations; political, economic, cultural, even diplomatic, break down,” the VTB boss said.

 

“I don’t know how [Western] banks could block SWIFT and then expect cooperation in the fight against terrorism and nuclear disarmament.”

 

However, replacing SWIFT within Russia won’t be difficult, Kostin said.

 

“We have a [similar] system at the Central Bank of Russia and others. The Central Bank has tested this system, and we can switch to it at any moment.”

But away from the specifics, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin explains Russia's Military and Industrial plans in this extensive interview… (via Eric Zuesse)

The Floridian blogger about Russia, "Vineyard of the Saker," posted an English translation on September 29th of an informative interview on Russian television.

 

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin, who has Russia's military portfolio, was addressing his nation's public, September 22nd, on Rossiya TV, and he explained how his country is responding to the threat of America's intending to place its nuclear missiles on Russia's border, inside Ukraine (much as the USSR had done in Cuba to America during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis). Russia is not responding with any talk about the nuclear button; at least not yet. There is still time enough to avoid anything so urgent as that. But they are preparing for such an eventuality. (8:50) "We are creating a nuclear submarine fleet … capable of reaching any country on any continent, if it suddenly becomes the aggressor and our topmost national interests come under threat."

Obama has started clearly in that direction, with his February 2014 Ukrainian coup d'etat installing a U.S.-allied Ukrainian Government to replace the former (and democratically elected) Russian-allied one; and Russia takes Obama's threat seriously; so, Russia is now rapidly updating its nuclear and other arsenals, and is offering technologically advanced military designers from all over the world extremely favorable terms for becoming Russian citizens.

Rogozin also says that (9:23), "by now, we have updated almost the entire fleet of strategic bombers."

All of the military parts and products that were formerly being manufactured in Ukraine, have been switched to Russian factories instead. Now (10:48), "Everything is produced in Russia." He says that many of Ukraine's top military designers have already moved to Russia, and that most of the others are desperate to leave Ukraine.

He comments (12:31), "For Ukraine, it is the end. It is a complete demise of the Ukrainian state as an industrial country. Nobody wants their products in the West because they are outdated, and they [the West] have their own manufacturers. What they [Ukraine] are doing right now is suicide. … I say this with great regret. I'll tell you one thing: we still had hope at the end of last year [before Obama's coup] that we would be able to remedy the situation [that it wouldn't happen]."

He says: (14:21), "On 21st of February, when a coup was staged, I had to fly to Kiev on behalf of The President [Putin]. [But] I stopped the car at the entrance to the airport, because it was clear that Ukraine was finished" as a manufacturing economy.

He sees manufacturing as the basis for a sound economy. (14:48) "Today, the only choice for them [Ukrainians] is to go into retail trade. But I think they also have another choice: to move to Russia." So: Putin is looking to build Russia's economy on a manufacturing basis, perhaps like China has done.

Rogozin repeatedly invites weapons-designers from around the world to move to Russia. Perhaps Putin takes as his inspiration what happened to the U.S. economy after our country, under President FDR in the 1940s, responded to the fascist threat by means of massive support to military R&D and manufacturing. Perhaps Putin hopes that Russia will become the new America, maybe that Putin will become the new FDR.

The interviewer responds (15:52) "What a strange story is unfolding." And Rogozin continues, "From now on, we will be gathering the best experts in the world." So: that (which also happened under FDR, and continued under Truman) is, indeed, their intention.

As if intending to make his point absolutely clear, he continues: "The Americans used to 'suck out' the best brains from around the world, … now we are reversing this process."

Discussing France's having gone along with Obama to stop production of France's Mistral aircraft-carrier ships to the Russian Navy, he says (20:45), "The money [from us] is paid, which means that they have to return it with penalties. And … France is losing not just money, but their reputation as a reliable supplier."

Then, starting at 22:32, he notes that when he first entered the Government (which was at around the time that Putin first became President), he noticed that "our individual businesses preferred to buy micro-electronics in the West," and that they would need "to start the production, in Russia, of all that is necessary." He says "We have already given the necessary instructions" to do precisely that. Obama's action in Ukraine seems to have spurred Russia to do this. Yet again, it is like America during WWII.

He continues immediately to add: "However, what we cannot, or do not have the time to make, we can get in other countries who are in trading partnership with us," mainly the "BRIC" or rapidly industrializing countries, with whom Putin has been bu
ilding a trading-bloc.

The discussion then goes on to whether building Russia's manufacturing base upon the making of weapons is a sound idea, and Rogozin says (24:34) that among Putin's advisors, "we try not to argue publicly, but on the inside it is all boiling."

He says that Russia's high interest-rates are a great problem for developing manufactures. He makes a stunning admission (24:53): "They [America] are in a much more favorable position, no sanctions, no one prevents them from working; the banking policy [Federal Reserve] supports the industry. We do not have any of this. We are not going to now discuss the reasons why, but those are the facts. This is why the government now is making a decision to compensate for the [high] interest rate for enterprises in the military-industrial complex." Russian sovereign debt will probably soar.

However, Putin has decided "to develop a program to transfer technology from the defense [sector] into civil" manufacturing, so as to reduce the extra economic burden on them. The real hardship, apparently, will go to Russia's consumers. But, then, after the military-manufacturing sector gets humming, "they should be ready to produce similar high-tech products for the civil industry," including, "metallurgy, electronics, composite materials, and much much more."

Secondly, (27:06), "Today, they [Russian manufacturers] have defence contracts, tomorrow they might have less. They need a safety net — supplies for the civil market." It would, yet again, be very much in the mold of FDR, and of Harry S. Truman.

Perhaps Russia is now learning the lesson that America has now forgotten. Maybe Obama's America will become a spur to Russia — like Hitler, Tojo, and Mussolini, became spurs to America, in a time that America, evidently, has indeed forgotten, and in which we have become, eerily, the other side.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nHmiG5 Tyler Durden

Obama Administration Wants to Hide Gitmo Force-Feed Trial From Public

The Obama administration’s Justice Department is
trying to keep a trial about force-feeding at Guantanamo Bay out of
the public eye.

The Miami Herald‘s indefatigable Gitmo reporter Carol
Rosenberg writes:

Justice Department lawyers filed the motion at
the U.S. District Court in Washington on Friday. Lawyers for the
detainee and news media organizations are opposing it. …

The Justice Department proposes to adopt a Guantánamo war court
model of closing the hearing. It argues that not all the testimony
will involve state secrets but, because some of what witnesses say
touches on classified information, the judge should close it. As a
remedy, it proposes, order that the court issue a transcript of the
hearing — with any classified information blacked out.

One of the proposed witnesses is Sondra
Crosby
, a doctor who treats victims of torture,
who testified
in open 
court at Guantánamo in April that another captive
facing death-penalty proceedings was subjected to mental, physical
and sexual torture.

This case centers on Abu Wael Dhiab, 43, who has been in the
prison since 2002. He’s
never been charged
with a crime and has been cleared for
release since 2009.

He participated in widespread hunger strikes last year.
Consequently, he was force-fed. U.S. District Court Judge Gladys
Kessler in May approved his request for a restraining order to
guards from force-feeding him, but the order recently expired. He
wants it renewed, because he’s being force-fed again.

Kessler is set
hear on October 6-7
Dhiab’s claim that “the U.S. military
policy of forcing him from his cell, strapping him into a restraint
chair and pumping a nutritional supplement into his stomach amounts
to torture.”

While the federal government says it needs to censor documents
for national security purposes, Dhiab’s lawyers
tell
Politico, “There is no reason to close the
upcoming hearing, other than the government’s intense desire to
hide from public scrutiny the evidence we have managed to uncover
over the past few months.”

Rosenberg writes that 16 media organizations are filing motions
to keep the case transparent.

The Associated Press has previously
pointed out
the significance of public knowledge about prison:
The number of hunger strikers is an “unofficial barometer of
conditions at the secretive military outpost.” Late last year, the
prison abruptly stopped publishing updates on those numbers,
though.

President Barack Obama has previously
made statements
in opposition to force-feeding hunger strikers,
but has taken no action to end the practice. 

Here are some Reason TV facts about Gitmo in 54 seconds:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vsOriS
via IFTTT

Tuesday Humor: S##t Happens, But Not In China

On the heels of the Ebola news.. we thought a laugh was in order…

Umm…

 

 

Those Chinese TSA agents must have very small hands…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1owkRVR Tyler Durden

Singapore Global Gold Hub Cometh – Launches Kilo Bar Contract And Gold ATMs

Singapore Becoming Global Gold Hub – Launches Kilo Bar Contract And Gold ATMs

Singapore continues its push to be a global gold hub. The new exchange traded Singapore kilobar gold contract will launch in less than two weeks – on October 13. The new contract is a 1 kilogramme physically deliverable gold contract for the Asian and global wholesale gold market.


Launching of SGX Gold Futures Contract: (from left) Harshika Patel, Managing Director, JP Morgan; Sunil Kashyap, Managing Director, Bank of Nova Scotia; Aram Shishmaniam, CEO, World Gold Council; Ng Cheng Thye, President, Singapore Bullion Market Association; Seah Moon Ming, Chairman, International Enterprise (IE) Singapore; Muthukrishnan Ramaswami, President, Singapore Exchange; Philip Hurley, CEO (South East Asia), Standard Merchant Bank; Jeremy East, Managing Director (Global Head of Metal Trading), Standard Chartered Bank.

In a joint statement, International Enterprise (IE) Singapore, Singapore Bullion Market Association (SBMA), Singapore Exchange (SGX) and the World Gold Council, announced the new contract yesterday.

The contract will be traded on SGX, the first wholesale 25 kilobar gold contract to be offered globally, and this is a collaboration among the four parties. The SGX is Singapore’s securities and derivatives exchange and clearing and depository provider.

This caters to the very high demand for physical gold in China and throughout Asia, which has increased significantly over the last decade.

This new gold contract differs from others in that as well as acting as a price discovery benchmark for 1kg gold bars in the Asian region, it has been specifically designed to actually deliver gold to large buyers, wholesalers and institutions, presumably including central banks.

Settlement of the contract is in gold 1kg bars and not in cash. A 1kg gold bar is 32.15 troy ounces.


The Singapore contract will be in lots of 25 kilogrammes and denominated in U.S. dollars. It will trade for three hours in the Singapore morning time. Singapore is 7 hours ahead of London and 12 hours ahead of New York, and 2.5 hours ahead of the Indian market, but is in the same time zone as both Hong Kong and Shanghai.


Six consecutive daily contracts will trade at the same time, so when one contract expires, another will be added.


Physical settlement is two days after trade date and consists of 99.99 purity 1 kilogramme gold bars that meet the approval of the Singapore Bullion Market Association (SBMA) good delivery list . This means that wholesalers will be able to gauge demand and supply of 1 kg bars over the following week.

Some analysts have said that the protests in Hong Kong and the uncertain political outlook in Hong Kong may give Singapore an advantage in terms of becoming Asia and possibly the world’s global gold hub.

Separately, the first gold-dispensing automated teller machine in Asia have been launched in Singapore. The two ATMs are in Marina Bay Sands and Resorts World Sentosa hotels.

Launched by Asia Gold ATM, Singapore is the fourth country to have the facility, next to the UAE, the UK and the US. Items such as 1g to 10g pure gold bars, as well as customised gold coins, can be bought from the machine.

Last Wednesday, the day the machines were unveiled to the public, a one gram pendant sold for $100 while it was $660 for a 10 gramme. The items can be paid through credit card or cash. Gold will be sold at different prices daily, based on the day’s global prices.


The ATMs mean little or nothing with regards to Singapore becoming a global gold hub. However, they show how gold is respected and sought after in Singapore and the people and institutions of Singapore, have a significant cultural affinity with gold.

Unlike in the west, where people who believe in using gold for wealth preservation or for saving are sometimes called names and dismissively called “gold bugs”.

Gold and money, throughout history has flowed to where it is better treated. Today, gold continues to flow from West to East. A sign of shifting economic fortunes.




Faber Webinar On Storing Gold in Singapore

Essential Guide To Storing Gold In Singapore

RECEIVE OUR IMPORTANT MARKET UPDATES HERE


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rrBUho GoldCore

First Ebola Case in U.S. Confirmed. Don’t Panic!

EbolaCNBC is reporting that Texas
Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas has stated that it is treating a
patient for the Ebola virus. The patient had recently traveled back
from Liberia where the disease is spreading nearly without control.
The person was not symptomatic during the flight. Four American
health care workers have been or are being treated for
Ebola. 

Interestingly this case is within the time frame calculated
earlier by epidemiological models. As I reported
earlier this month

A new study in the journal PLoS Currents
Outbreaks
 calculates that there is an 18
percent chance
 that a case of Ebola will arrive in the
United States by the end of this month. The researchers inputed
airline travel data and various outbreak scenarios into a computer
model to come up with probabilty figures for the arrival of Ebola
in 16 different countries. Is it time to panic? Absolutely not. The
researchers also report that the likelihood that the disease would
spread extensively in developed countries is tiny:

We observe that the expected value of the cluster size in
the case of international spread is always rather small (in all
countries mean<6; median<4). Large outbreak involving more
than 10 individuals although potentially possible can be considered
as very rare events (Detailed statistics per country are available
upon request). This numerical evidence is good news, as it points
out that effective management and isolation of cases is keeping the
number of EVD (Ebola) cases to deal with to a very limited number,
lowering the risk of losing control of the outbreak.

In other words, the number of people likely to be infected
through contact with a person bringing Ebola to our shores maxes
out at around 10 individuals.

Stay calm and carry on. 

My colleauge Emily Ekins noted back in August that a USA
Today
poll reported that
40 percent of Americans
thought an Ebola outbreak was likely in
a U.S. city. 

Will update after the Centers for Disease Control press
conference later today. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1v1ZHlO
via IFTTT

First Ebola Case in U.S. Confirmed. Don't Panic!

EbolaCNBC is reporting that Texas
Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas has stated that it is treating a
patient for the Ebola virus. The patient had recently traveled back
from Liberia where the disease is spreading nearly without control.
The person was not symptomatic during the flight. Four American
health care workers have been or are being treated for
Ebola. 

Interestingly this case is within the time frame calculated
earlier by epidemiological models. As I reported
earlier this month

A new study in the journal PLoS Currents
Outbreaks
 calculates that there is an 18
percent chance
 that a case of Ebola will arrive in the
United States by the end of this month. The researchers inputed
airline travel data and various outbreak scenarios into a computer
model to come up with probabilty figures for the arrival of Ebola
in 16 different countries. Is it time to panic? Absolutely not. The
researchers also report that the likelihood that the disease would
spread extensively in developed countries is tiny:

We observe that the expected value of the cluster size in
the case of international spread is always rather small (in all
countries mean<6; median<4). Large outbreak involving more
than 10 individuals although potentially possible can be considered
as very rare events (Detailed statistics per country are available
upon request). This numerical evidence is good news, as it points
out that effective management and isolation of cases is keeping the
number of EVD (Ebola) cases to deal with to a very limited number,
lowering the risk of losing control of the outbreak.

In other words, the number of people likely to be infected
through contact with a person bringing Ebola to our shores maxes
out at around 10 individuals.

Stay calm and carry on. 

My colleauge Emily Ekins noted back in August that a USA
Today
poll reported that
40 percent of Americans
thought an Ebola outbreak was likely in
a U.S. city. 

Will update after the Centers for Disease Control press
conference later today. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1v1ZHlO
via IFTTT

Headline of the Day: ‘UMass to Review Policy on Students as Confidential Drug Informants’

UMassThat eyebrow-raiser comes from
Inside Higher Ed
, which provided a brief synopsis of a
very curious program at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
University police apparently caught a student, “Logan,” selling LSD
in a club a year ago. Normally, this would have led to criminal
charges, a school suspension, and parental notification; instead,
administrators offered to bury the matter and drop the
punishments.

All Logan had to do was become an undercover drug informant for
UMass, according to an unbelievable
Boston
Globe
story.

Logan accepted—it was “an offer I can’t refuse,” he told his
friends—and became an undercover UMass police informant. His
codename was CI-8. He did his job and helped the university catch
at least one other dealer.

A year later, his parents—who had no idea about his troubles
with drugs—found him dead of a heroin overdose.

Now some are wondering whether forcing Logan to stay in the drug
culture in order to ferret out other dealers was the best thing for
him, given his addiction:

If Logan had not become an informant, he would have faced
expulsion from his dorm and suspension from school under the UMass
substance abuse policy, and, if the dean of students found he was
guilty of the offenses, his parents would have been notified. He
also could have been ordered to attend a drug education
program.

Instead, Logan was enabled to keep his addiction a secret from
his family. After briefly going cold turkey in the late spring of
2013, he was using again by the middle of July, his text messages
show. Looking ahead to the fall at UMass, he texted one friend that
his apartment would be the “shootup den.”

UMass has announced plans to
review the drug informant policy
, at least:

The university defended the program, but said it will review
whether to require informants in drug cases to get help for
possible addictions and whether to notify parents when a student is
recruited into the program.

“The assessment will help determine whether the confidential
informant program can operate successfully with a mandatory
referral to an addiction specialist or notification to a parent
. . . while maintaining a program that deters
distribution of illegal, lethal drugs,” UMass said in a
statement.

A university conscripted a student-addict into dangerous
undercover police work that could have gotten him killed—and in a
way, it eventually did. Ladies and gentlemen, your War on
Drugs.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vuJ0BY
via IFTTT

Headline of the Day: 'UMass to Review Policy on Students as Confidential Drug Informants'

UMassThat eyebrow-raiser comes from
Inside Higher Ed
, which provided a brief synopsis of a
very curious program at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
University police apparently caught a student, “Logan,” selling LSD
in a club a year ago. Normally, this would have led to criminal
charges, a school suspension, and parental notification; instead,
administrators offered to bury the matter and drop the
punishments.

All Logan had to do was become an undercover drug informant for
UMass, according to an unbelievable
Boston
Globe
story.

Logan accepted—it was “an offer I can’t refuse,” he told his
friends—and became an undercover UMass police informant. His
codename was CI-8. He did his job and helped the university catch
at least one other dealer.

A year later, his parents—who had no idea about his troubles
with drugs—found him dead of a heroin overdose.

Now some are wondering whether forcing Logan to stay in the drug
culture in order to ferret out other dealers was the best thing for
him, given his addiction:

If Logan had not become an informant, he would have faced
expulsion from his dorm and suspension from school under the UMass
substance abuse policy, and, if the dean of students found he was
guilty of the offenses, his parents would have been notified. He
also could have been ordered to attend a drug education
program.

Instead, Logan was enabled to keep his addiction a secret from
his family. After briefly going cold turkey in the late spring of
2013, he was using again by the middle of July, his text messages
show. Looking ahead to the fall at UMass, he texted one friend that
his apartment would be the “shootup den.”

UMass has announced plans to
review the drug informant policy
, at least:

The university defended the program, but said it will review
whether to require informants in drug cases to get help for
possible addictions and whether to notify parents when a student is
recruited into the program.

“The assessment will help determine whether the confidential
informant program can operate successfully with a mandatory
referral to an addiction specialist or notification to a parent
. . . while maintaining a program that deters
distribution of illegal, lethal drugs,” UMass said in a
statement.

A university conscripted a student-addict into dangerous
undercover police work that could have gotten him killed—and in a
way, it eventually did. Ladies and gentlemen, your War on
Drugs.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vuJ0BY
via IFTTT

N.H. Cop Involved in Ridiculous and Deadly Drug Bust Could Get Job Back Despite Being Fired for Pattern of Misconduct

Joseph KellyLast
year, Officer Joseph Kelley of the Weare Police Department in New
Hampshire supervised a drug bust where cops lured a man high on
cocaine and heroin to the main thoroughway in town to bust him
buying drugs, and then shot and killed him when, they say, he sped
his car toward them.

Earlier this year the attorney general’s office in New Hampshire
decided it
did not have enough evidence
to prosecute anyone involved in
the shooting—among the office’s complaints were that cops provided
conflicting testimony.

Nevertheless, the attorney general’s office and the Weare police
chief criticized Kelley for the poor judgment in setting up the
drug bust. Kelley went on medical leave for stress related to the
shooting. Kelley was fired a few months later after a separate
investigation found him lying on time cards, writing bad checks,
and getting co-workers to lie, but now, the Concord
Monitor
reports, Kelley could get
his job back
after the city decided to rescind his termination
by the police chief:

Tom Clow, chairman of the Weare Board of Selectmen, declined to
comment on the decision. He said Sunday that the board planned to
meet with Broth last night, at which time Kelley’s name “may or may
not” come up.

The town, which has struggled for months to rebuild the image of
its beleaguered police force, is also dealing with domestic
violence allegations against its police chief, John Velleca.
Velleca, who was hired last fall and who requested Kelley’s
termination in November, has been placed on paid administrative
leave.

It’s not clear whether the timing of those claims played any
part in the decision to rescind Kelley’s termination.

Broth’s letter was sent to King and Erin DeRenzis, assistant
general counsel for AFSCME Council 93, which represents Weare
police officers. In it, he states that the board continues to
“expressly” deny any wrongdoing, and that its decision was made “to
avoid the time, expense and inconvenience that arise from an
arbitration hearing.”

Kelley may no get his job back. While the city awarded his back
pay (based on him being on worker’s compensation for the stress)
and rescinded his termination, the city indicated if he returned to
work the police department would re-open the internal investigation
into the fatal drug bust.

Kelley was
previously involved
in a case that reached the First Circuit
Court of Appeals, after he arrested Carla Gericke for, among other
things, recording him (with a camera that didn’t work). Prosecutors
dropped charges against Gericke but she sued for retaliatory
prosecution and violation of her First Amendment rights. The court
ruled Kelley couldn’t do what he did. That incident was in
2010.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1v1Pztv
via IFTTT