Will Gold Be The World’s Best Currency, Again?

Submitted by Henry Hewitt via OilPrice.com,

After Peak Debt Comes Deflation

Paper money, ‘the Heaven-sent leaf’, is nothing new, but it has not always been held in high regard nor previously attained its unquestioned position as the lubricant of trade, financial markets and the road to wealth.

In fact, for most of the last 2,500 years, since Croesus brought scalable coinage to the world, paper money has been considered a temporary, even flaky, alternative to real money – hard money – gold and silver specie. Indeed, even in recent memory, the road to the Emerald City was paved with ounces of gold, hence the Yellow Brick Road in the Land of Oz

If you are an investor, this may be the time to have a serious talk with the face you see in the mirror and ask: Have we really moved on from the ‘barbarous relic’? Can paper money keep its value when all the Central Bankers and planners in the world are intent upon printing as much of it as they possibly can? Is it different this time?

Who needs paper, you say? Now we have electronic money, bits and photons flashing across our screens, capable of leaping vast oceans at a single bound. That is different. What isn’t different is that those bits, and that paper have to represent something of value, and in a world where the ability to produce anything and everything – from the paper itself, to copper, aluminum, iron ore, oil and the ships to move them around the world – has reached a point that there seems to be more stuff available than demand from those who put that stuff to work, or even on the shelf expecting to sell it in the not too distant future.

In the process, driven by animal spirits that have always taken markets to new heights, another summit has been reached – peak debt. From the pages of The New York Times we read: “Beneath the surface of the global financial system lurks a multitrillion-dollar problem that could sap the strength of large economies for years to come.”

One sure way to know that the world’s economy is in a pickle is the arrival, and continuation, of low, even zero or negative rates of interest around the world. What does that even mean? It means that investors are so concerned they would rather pay a government or institution for the privilege of lending them money than keep it in a local bank or under the mattress. It happened in 1932, just before the wheels fell off the U.S. banking system. It is happening now.

David Stockman, the Reagan Administration’s boy wonder when it came to financing ‘supply-side’ economics, a policy that Mr. Reagan’s presidential rival in 1980 (George Bush Sr.) called ‘Voodoo economics’, has seen the light.

“I think it’s the end of an era . . . [Central Banks] create[d] a massive credit expansion in the world that’s stopping . . . Everywhere is at peak debt . . . Secondly, the Central Banks are all out of powder. The Fed has painted itself into a corner . . . They can’t see what’s coming right at us which is a global deflation . . . We’re gonna have a Capex depression,” he told Bloomberg on February 9.

What a pity it wasn’t gold paint.

Chart of Gold Prices


A move from 1,100 to 1,900 — 2011 peak — is a gain of 72 percent, roughly the gain mandated in the Gold Reserve Act of 1934.

Even if the thought of buying or owning gold is sacrilege to your ears, and you just cannot bring yourself to do it, you ought to be asking yourself if more paper money makes sense now. When you had that chat with the face in the mirror did you ask: “How much faith do you have in paper money? How much faith do you have in Central Banks? How much faith do you have in the fiscal probity of the government?”

“Attention K-Mart shoppers, shares that could be bought in 2009 at the devilishly low price of 666 on the S&P 500 are now going for 2,000. Get ‘em while they last. Don’t wait for 3,000.” In other words, shares that were ‘too risky’ at 666 became ‘prudent’ investments at 2,000. At 3,000 they should be risk free. Am I missing something?

If you cannot help yourself and still believe that the road to wealth and security lies along the paper trail (and not a trail of tears), you won’t be alone:

We few, we happy few, we band of buyers . . .
. . . Be he ne’er so vile,
This trade shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in T-Bills now instead
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their net worth’s cheap whiles any speaks
That bought with us upon St. Greenspan’s Day.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ToYy7G Tyler Durden

Stocks Surge On Biggest Short-Squeeze In 4 Months As Crude, Credit, & Carry Crumble

Stocks are up – just ignore everything else… "all is well"

 

One of these things is not like the other… Stocks were panic-bought once Europe closed but Crude, Credit, and Carry crumbled…

 

From the moment a UAE minister opened his mouth last Thursday afternoon, US equities have soared…

 

This is the best 2-day gain for the S&P since August!

 

Small Caps & Trannies were best as the squeeze came on… panic-buy8ing into the close…

 

As "Most Shorted" have soared 7% off Thursday lows with a big squeeze at the open today…

 

The last 2 days are the biggest short-squeeze in over 4 months…

 

US equities decoupled from Oil and USDJPY as Europe closed…

 

US credit markets – having had the day off yesterday – are not buying the euphoria…

 

Financials and Energy stocks both showed gains on the day despite credit weakness (and underlying weakness in crude)…

 

Don't show Jamie Dimon this chart…

 

While many European banks gave up their early equity gains – including CS and DB – US Financial stocks enjoyed another day of exuberance following Jamie Dimon' "Big Buy" – the only trouble is… credit risk for these names actually rose 1bp to 171bps… are you really going to fall for this again?

 

Once again VIX was extremely noisy with spikes (all lower) all morning..

 

Treasury yields traded in a narrow range with the long-end underperforming as they extended their surge off last week's V-shaped bottom, not helped by AAPL and IBM issuance likely weighed on the complex…

 

The dollar rose for the 3rd day in a row (something it has not done for a month) for the best run in 2 months…

 

Between dollar strength, Goldman warnings, and the magic in stocks, commodities all weakened as hope disappeared from Crude..

 

As crude plunged off the hope highs back to a $28 handle…

 

Notably, the front-second month roll spread has narrowed back to pre-Phillips 66 dump levels…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1LshGty Tyler Durden

Illinois Libertarian Party Wins Court Victory for Easier Ballot Access

A 2012 lawsuit from the Illinois Libertarian Party (L.P.) has been resolved in their favor, with a decision for summary judgement on their behalf, reports Peoria Public Radio, making it easier for the L.P. to get on ballots without having to find candidates to run for a full slate of state offices or even county offices.

Existing Illinois law required third parties who hadn’t achieved full legal ballot access, but not Democrats or Republicans, to run a full slate to get any state or country candidates on the ballot.

Illinoise Libertarian Party Chair Lex Green said that:

defenders of the law use “high-minded language, to say ‘We’re trying to keep whackos and nut jobs from getting on the ballot.’

“Which I would argue that just because they have an R or D after their name doesn’t mean they’re any more sane or less so than the Libertarians,” he says. “To me you can say whatever you want but it hides a political agenda. Because if you make the burden of getting on the ballot higher for somebody than for somebody else, then this is obviously unequal treatment under the law, which in my book is wrong … I personally think that it is all political maneuvering to keep the Democrats and Republicans in power in Illinois.”

The order issued Friday by Judge Andrea R. Wood of the Northern District U.S. Court finds the full slate law unconstitutional. Her reasoning isn’t yet known; a decision hasn’t been published.

Richard Winger at the irreplaceable Ballot Access News site has more context on the history of Illinois’ requirements, which came about to stymie the Communist Party back in 1931 when Illinois still had “cumulative voting” in state House races where voters had three votes they could distribute or concentrate among candidates as they pleased. They wanted to make sure that one Commie couldn’t benefit unduly from concentrated votes.

Reason reported on the suit when it was filed back in 2012. A different federal judge from the beginning found the state’s requirements questionable.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1KUXntQ
via IFTTT

Marshals Might Be Coming After Student Loan Debtors, The Onion Goes Pro-Hillary, Trump Trolls Jeb: P.M. Links

  • Hillary ClintonThe federal government is allegedly dispatching U.S. marshals to track down people with unpaid student loan debts.
  • Behold: the most loathsome pro-censorship column ever written. (Plus: the would-be censor’s smug, self-indulgent bio.)
  • Donald Trump acquires JebBush.com.
  • Remember when The Onion was purchased by a major Hillary Clinton backer? Well…
  • Uh oh, a comedian told a non-PC joke at the BAFTA Awards.
  • The International Students for Liberty Conference is next week. Members of the Alumni for Liberty can vote for the 2016 Alumnus of the Year. Go here to check out the nominees and cast a vote. (Yes, I was nominated. As a friend said, “The only time I thought I’d see Robby Soave listed next to Ross Ulbricht would be on an FBI Most Wanted poster.”)

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1KUX81Y
via IFTTT

Why The Fed Thinks ‘You’ Are Crazy

There are two simple words, according to Grant Williams, which, when uttered in the ears of the high priests (and priestesses) at The Fed, equates you to 'Simple Jack' and worthy of no attention…

"Business Cycle"

These are the people we are dealing with and expecting to 'run' the economy?


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1oHEKzP Tyler Durden

Tech IPO Market “Frozen” As Investors “Nurse Wounds” After 40% Collapse

Zero. None. Nada… that is how many Tech IPOs there has been in 2016 – the worst start to a year in recent record.  Indeed, January marked the first month since September 2011 without an IPO of any kind, according to Renaissance Capital, manager of IPO-focused funds.

 

It does not look like it is set to get better any time soon either. As Reuters reports, with the battering technology stocks have suffered in the past couple of weeks, and the dismal performance of technology IPOs in the past couple of years, any idea of a springtime busy with technology offerings may also be wishful thinking.

Reuters continues,

Eric Jensen, an IPO attorney for Cooley LLP, said his firm has "a pretty significant pipeline of deals," with about 32 companies that have filed with regulators for IPOs, either confidentially or publicly. But he said plans by the five or so technology firms with a $1 billion-plus valuation in that queue, "are all stalled out."

 

The cratering in technology stocks has also helped to push down the valuations of private tech companies and interest in investing in them, say capital markets experts. Fewer options for capital raising means that high-flying companies may need to rein in spending, delay some ambitious expansion plans and even lay off staff, according to investors and tech consultants.

 

"A lot of these companies are going to have to rein in their costs in order to survive," said Matt Brady, co-founder and chief operating officer of investment firm Militello Capital.

 

"Those that wanted to go out in January, now they're stuck," Jensen said.

 

"It's quite possible that we will have volatility for the remainder of the year," said Nate Gallon, a partner who leads IPO deals for law firm Hogan Lovells. "People are bracing themselves." Companies face risks if they wait longer than six months between filing for an IPO and listing. Investors can lose interest, management teams can lose momentum and the offering can become anticlimactic, said Karim Anani, IPO west region leader for consulting firm EY.

To be sure, the U.S. stock market could stabilize and recover – it rallied on Friday – and a rebound in technology stock prices would increase the appeal of an IPO for companies like Nutanix. But experts say the number of public tech companies scaling back their revenue growth forecasts, bloated valuations in the private market and concern that the global economy is still on very shaky ground have created roadblocks.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1OeSW85 Tyler Durden

Capital Controls: Hayek versus the IMF

Authored by Steve H. Hanke of The Johns Hopkins University.

With each financial crisis, politicians of all stripes go into overdrive. They busy themselves by ducking any examination of the policy blunders that created the crisis in the first place. A favorite tactic is to fan anti-market flames. Markets get a bum wrap, and a cascade of new laws and regulations ensue.

Par for the course, the Great Recession has served up a plethora of wrongheaded laws and regulations. Capital controls designed to throw sand in the gears of unrestricted capital flows are but one example. Even the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has climbed on this bandwagon.

Capital controls as a panacea for economic ills are nothing new. Their pedigree can be traced back to Plato, the father of statism. Inspired by Lycurgus, the tyrant of Sparta, Plato embraced the idea of an inconvertible currency as a means to preserve the autonomy of the state from outside interference.

Before more people come under the spell of capital controls, they should reflect on the following passage from Friedrich Hayek’s 1944 classic, The Road to Serfdom:

“The extent of the control over all life that economic control confers is nowhere better illustrated than in the field of foreign exchanges. Nothing would at first seem to affect private life less than a state control of the dealings in foreign exchange, and most people will regard its introduction with complete indifference. Yet the experience of most Continental countries has taught thoughtful people to regard this step as the decisive advance on the path to totalitarianism and the suppression of individual liberty. It is, in fact, the complete delivery of the individual to the tyranny of the state, the final suppression of all means of escape — not merely for the rich but for everybody.”

The imposition of capital controls leads to an instantaneous reduction in the wealth of the country, because all assets decline in value.

Full convertibility is the only guarantee that protects people’s rights to what belongs to them. Even if governments are not compelled by arguments on the grounds of freedom, the prospect of seeing every asset in the country suddenly lose value as a result of capital controls should give policymakers pause.

This brings us to China — a country with a maze of capital controls and an inconvertible currency. After years of twisting Beijing’s arm to remove controls, now the IMF is willing to turn a blind eye, and what is worse, to embrace “temporary” measures designed to further restrict capital flows.

The I.M.F has chosen the road to serfdom. 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1OePIRY Steve H. Hanke

Support College Censorship or Become Its Target, Prominent Gay Activist Discovers

Peter Tatchell is one of the most prominent and vocal gay rights activists in England, participating in causes and actions going back to the 1970s. He famously attempted a citizen’s arrest of extremely anti-gay Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe when the leader was visiting London. He was actually attacked and injured by Mugabe’s guards during a second attempt to arrest the man in Brussels in 2001. He has a lengthy history of support for LGBT causes, peaceful causes, and all sorts of left-leaning positions.

But he signed a letter opposing behavior by students in colleges in the United Kingdom who were attempting to deny the ability of speakers to discuss ideas with which they did not agree, so screw him. If Tatchell doesn’t support driving out speakers who hold unpopular views, then he shouldn’t get to speak either. So the argument apparently goes. Tatchell is supposed to give a speech today at Canterbury Christ Church University on “re-radicalizing queers.” But his support for open platforms for free speech are not queer enough for the National Unions of Students’ LGBT rep. From The Guardian:

In the emails, sent to the organisers of a talk at Canterbury Christ Church University on Monday on the topic of “re-radicalising queers”, Cowling refuses an invitation to speak unless Tatchell, who has also been invited, does not attend. In the emails she cites Tatchell’s signing of an open letter in the Observer last year in support of free speech and against the growing trend of universities to “no-platform” people, such as Germaine Greer, for holding views with which they disagree.

Cowling claims the letter supports the incitement of violence against transgender people. She also made an allegation against him of racism or of using racist language. Tatchell told the Observer that the incident was yet another example of “a witch-hunting, accusatory atmosphere” symptomatic of a decline in “open debate on some university campuses”.

One of the founding members of direct action group OutRage!, which caused a storm in the 1990s by outing establishment figures it claimed were homophobic in public and homosexual in private, Tatchell is used to being in the establishment firing line. But the original radical queer is now finding himself having to think long and hard about free speech.

It is interesting that Tatchell is now having to think about free speech. You see, Tatchell has not exactly been a purist on free speech issues. He has been a major force behind opposition to the anti-gay lyrics of Jamaican dance hall music, a fight that was world news for a time back in the early part of the new millennium. A lot of the activism was a perfectly normal example of fighting bad speech with more speech—protests and calls for boycotts and attempts to apply social pressure to create change. But Tatchell also got British police involved in investigating the lyrics and shutting down concerts, arguing that the calls for violence with the lyrics were dangerous.

Now though, things have changed. Or perhaps Tatchell has at least found some nuances. Tatchell recently took a position on a bakery in Belfast that has been found guilty of anti-gay discrimination for refusing to write “Support Gay Marriage” on a cake because the message violated the baker’s religious beliefs. Tatchell’s position is in support of the bakery, not the customer. He originally condemned the bakers, but announced a change of position at the start of the month. He explained in The Guardian:

The judge concluded that service providers are required to facilitate any “lawful” message, even if they have a conscientious objection. This raises the question: should Muslim printers be obliged to publish cartoons of Mohammed? Or Jewish ones publish the words of a Holocaust denier? Or gay bakers accept orders for cakes with homophobic slurs? If the Ashers verdict stands it could, for example, encourage far-right extremists to demand that bakeries and other service providers facilitate the promotion of anti-migrant and anti-Muslim opinions. It would leave businesses unable to refuse to decorate cakes or print posters with bigoted messages.

In my view, it is an infringement of freedom to require businesses to aid the promotion of ideas to which they conscientiously object. Discrimination against people should be unlawful, but not against ideas.

This isn’t taking it as far as defending (philosophically) the right for singers to wish death upon gay people, but baby steps.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1PDlxYK
via IFTTT