Can Sheriff Arpaio’s Dirty Endorsement Clean Trump’s Illegal Immigration Problem?

Just when you think that this Republican primary can’t sink any lower, it does. The latest low point came during last Donald Trump Hairnight’s brawl when Donald Trump proudly proclaimed that he had been endorsed by Joe Arpaio.

Arpaio, H&R readers will recall, is Arizona’s notorious sheriff who terrorized undocumented workers and abused prisoners for fun. His sport cost Maricopa taxpayers  $142 million in legal expenses, settlements and court awards and included such games as: dressing male inmates in pink underwear, forcing a pregnant undocumented woman to deliver in shackles, instituting the world’s first juvenile chain gang, serving fetid food in jail, and packing thousands of prisoners into a hastily constructed “tent city” (“concentration camp” in his own words) in 145 degrees.

Yet there was Trump touting his tough-on-illegals bona fides by whipping out his inner Valley Girl and boasting that Arpaio has “totally endorsed me.” (He’s probably saving up David Duke’s endorsement for the next debate.)

But Trump maybe hating on illegals now, yet he has been far from averse about using them to build his own (non) fortune (there is some credible evidence that his bank balance may be $250 million, no bigger than what he inherited, his constant paeans to his own wealth and success notwithstanding). And even Arapaio’s dirty endorsement may not be enough to clean up Trump’s sordid record.

As Rubio pointed out last night, Trump relied on 200 illegal Polish workers to build the Trump Tower in midtown Manhattan. This saved Trump a bundle in union wages and benefits that he would have had to pay had he hired American workers.

But that is not even the worst of it. He refused to pay this Polish brigade — as it came to be called — even the meager wages he had promised. How meager? $4 to $5 an hour for 12-hour shifts with nothing extra for overtime.

With the help of unions, the workers launched a $4 million class action lawsuit that lingered in courts for decades until finally The Donald, after vowing to never settle out-of-court, settled out-of-court for an undisclosed amount.

Trump says that he should not have been held responsible given that his contractor hired those workers not him. But a similar defense didn’t work for poor Mitt Romney when he tried to justify the undocumented workers tending to his lawn.

What’s more, this was hardly Trump’s only foray with foreign workers. As The New York Times has reported, Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, which is “one of the most highly regarded private clubs in the world,” is teeming with foreign labor:

Since 2010, nearly 300 United States residents have applied or been referred for jobs as waiters, waitresses, cooks and housekeepers there. But according to federal records, only 17 have been hired. In all but a handful of cases, Mar-a-Lago sought to fill the jobs with hundreds of foreign guest workers from Romania and other countries.

 [Trump] pursued more than 500 visas for foreign workers at Mara-Lago since 2010, according to the United States Department of Labor, while hundreds of domestic applicants failed to get the same jobs. The visas are issued through one of a handful of legal and often debated programs through which employers can temporarily hire foreign workers when American labor is not available. As part of its applications for the visas submitted to the Labor Department, Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago attested that in the vast majority of cases, it was unable to fill the positions with American workers, or, as he told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in September, “getting help in Palm Beach during the season is almost impossible.” Asked why his club must seek so many foreign workers when Americans have applied for the same positions, Mr. Trump said in a telephone interview from Mar-a-Lago this month: “The only reason they wouldn’t get a callback is that they weren’t qualified, for some reason. There are very few qualified people during the high season in the area.”

There would be nothing wrong with this, except for the rank hypocrisy: A man whose whole presidential campaign is based on demonizing American employers who hire foreign workers and allegedly deprive Americans of jobs is trying to hang on to his fortune, such as it is, by hiring foreign workers and depriving Americans of jobs.

But the candidate who is truly pathetic on immigration in this election cycle is not Trump. It isn’t even Cruz who thinks that Trump’s anti-amnesty screeds don’t go far enough; no one expected any decencey from him any way. It is Rubio. Instead of proudly sticking to his high-minded, pro-immigration rhetoric, he has gone Trump-lite by: trying to distance himself from the Gang of Eight reforms, especially the provision relating to the legalization of undocumented workers; huffing-and-puffing about securing the border instead of creating a guest worker program to solve the undocumented worker problem; saber-rattling against Syrian refugees after once making a noble case for taking more Middle Eastern refugees because that’s what “America stands for.” (Say what you will about Jeb Bush’s sad candidacy, but at least he stuck to his guns on this issue.)

Last night was undoubtedly Rubio’s strongest performance. It was heart warming to watch him smack Trump around and expose him for the con man he is. Whether this will translate into any victories for him on Super Tuesday remains to be seen.

But even if it does, they’ll be pyrrhic victories given that they’ll come at the price of accepting Trump’s ugly terms.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1OB7DlU
via IFTTT

Gold’s Best Month In 4 Years Sees Record February COMEX Volumes

As gold prices "Golden Cross," the precious metal is set for its best month in 4 years, and best 2-month rise since 2011. The entire precious metals complex is active with the largest fund inflows since 2009 and the biggest February COMEX trading volume in history.

2016 has seen the best start to a year since 1980 for gold…

 

The best 2 months in gold since 2011…

 

Pushed prices to a "Golden Cross"…

 

As Bloomberg reports, gold's rally is spurring investor interest with volume on the biggest futures exchange rocketing. With prices set for the best month in four years, trading on the Comex is poised for the strongest-ever February.

 

Aggregated volumes on the New York futures exchange rose 54 percent from the same month a year ago to about 4 million contracts with one trading day left.

Amid the highest inflows since 2009…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1QC85Sm Tyler Durden

While Gundlach Was Warning That “Equities Are In A Bear Market” 2 Weeks Ago, He Was Busy Buying Stocks

If it feels like just two weeks ago when Jeffrey Gundlach was spewing almost daily fire and brimstone about the future of the market is because that’s precisely when he was doing just that.

Recall on February 8 when we wrote that in an email exchange with Reuters, the DoubleLine chief said “credit fund bankruptcies are coming,” adding that “it’s not a market to be flopping around in. The trends are relentless and powerful.”

 Gundlach also said, on a day when the VIX had risen to 26, that the VIX needs to surge above 40 before a bottom can be made in the high-yield junk bond market adding that “this is not a trader’s market” and instead “it is a freight train that you want to stay in sync with. There’s too much order and belief in markets in spite of big losses.

Most notably, he said equities are in a bear market, with the Nasdaq down 18.3 percent from its highs and “many, many, many stocks down over 25 percent from their highs” while on the topic of crude he said that “there’s simply no bullish case for oil right now.

Then, just three days later on February 11, he turned even more bearish saying that gold prices are likely to reach $1400 an ounce “as investors lose faith in central banks.”

“The evidence that negative rates are harmful and not helpful has piled up to the point that the ‘In Central Banks We Trust’ mantra has finally been laid bare as a hoax,” Gundlach said.

So it may come as a surprise that just as Gundlach was warning about the impending failure of central banks, the lack of a “bullish cash for oil”, about a bear market for stocks, and about an imminent surge in gold Gundlach was…. buying stocks.

As Reuters reports Jeffrey Gundlach “said on Friday that his firm purchased some U.S. stocks two weeks ago after their rocky start in January.”

“I thought it was a good buy point two weeks ago Wednesday and so we bought some,” Gundlach told Reuters. Gundlach, who oversees $90 billion in assets for the Los Angeles-based DoubleLine, said the firm was at “maximum underweight” since last August.

Also remember the “no bullish cash for oil” just two weeks ago? Well, that’s changed too: “He also said oil will “really easily” rally toward $40 a barrel as the price has dropped so much. Last year, Gundlach correctly predicted that oil prices would plunge, junk bonds would live up to their name and China’s slowing economy would pressure emerging markets. In 2014, Gundlach also correctly forecast U.S. Treasury yields would fall, not rise as many others had expected.”

Basically, Jeff Gundlach just pulled a David Tepper who, as we reported one week ago, added 75% to his long positions after saying “Now A Good Time To Take Money Off The Table

Which makes sense: buy when others are fearful, especially if you are stoking said fear.

That said Gundlach hasn’t completely lost his “bearish” bias and Gundlach said the Shanghai Composite, which is trading around 2,767 points, is set to fall to around 2,500.

In other words, if Gundlach was buying stocks when he was spewing fire and brimstone, it is probably safe to assume that with today’s bullish reversal, he is taking advantage of the relentless ramp to unload as much as he can. As for the Shanghai Composite: it may be time to buy.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1QlvB73 Tyler Durden

Netflix Suffers “Death Cross”

With FANGs still down 10% from the end-2015 highs, and only Facebook green for the year, some might question the “never sell” mentality preached to all from the bullish-pulpit of brokerage-TV. However, for one of the FANGs, things just got a little dark. For the first time since 2014, NFLX just suffered a “death cross.”

 

The last two times the 50DMA crossed below the 200DMA – creating a “death cross” – NFLX tumbled…

 

It’s different this time though


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1TINzWR Tyler Durden

Nigeria’s Little Problem: Lying Statistics

Authored by Steve H. Hanke of the Johns Hopkins University. Follow him on Twitter @Steve_Hanke.

 

Nigeria’s currency (the naira) has been officially pegged in a range of 197-199 NGN/USD for nearly a year. But, that’s a phony government rate. As shown in the accompanying chart, the black market (read: free market) rate has exploded since October, and currently stands at 350 NGN/USD.

And that’s not all. Last week, the Central Bank of Nigeria reported an annual inflation rate of 9.62% for January 2016. The real annual inflation rate was over six times higher. Talk about lying statistics.

The most reliable method for calculating inflation in countries experiencing elevated rates of inflation is to utilize changes in the black market exchange rate data. Application of the Purchasing Power Parity theory (PPP) then allows us to calculate implied inflation rates. At high levels of inflation, this method is extraordinarily accurate. The real tale of Nigeria’s inflation problem is contained in the accompanying chart. Nigeria’s implied annual inflation rate exceeds 60%.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/24tfcXN Steve H. Hanke

“China Is A Monumental Doomsday Machine” Stockman Warns

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

The Red Chip casino took another one of its patented 6.5% belly flops this week. In fact, more than 1,300 stocks in Shanghai and Shenzhen fell by 10% – the maximum drop permitted by regulators in one day – implying that the real decline was far deeper.

This renewed carnage was the worst since, well, the last 6% drop way back on January 29, and It means that the cumulative meltdown from last June’s high is pushing 45%. And all this red chip mayhem did not come at an especially propitious moment for the regime, as the  Wall Street Journal explained:

It comes at an awkward moment for the Chinese government, which is hosting the world’s leading central bankers and finance ministers starting Friday. China has been expected to use the G-20 meeting to address global anxiety about its economy and financial markets. Worries about China’s economic slowdown and the volatility of its markets have weighed on investment decisions around the world.

But if we are remarking on “awkward”, here’s awkward. The G-20 central bankers, finance ministers and IMF apparatchiks descending on Shanghai should take an unfiltered, eyes-wide-open view of the Red Ponzi fracturing all about them, and then make a petrified mad dash back to their own respective capitals. There is nothing more for G-20 to talk about with respect to China except how to get out of harms’ way, fast.

China is a monumental doomsday machine that bears no more resemblance to anything that could be called stable, sustainable capitalism than did Lenin’s New Economic Policy of the early 1920s. The latter was followed by Stalin’s Gulag and it would be wise to learn the Chinese word for the same, and soon.

The regime is in a horrendous bind because it has played out the greatest credit spree in world history. This cycle of undisciplined, debt-fueled digging, building, spending and speculating took its collective balance sheet from $500 billion of debt in the mid-1990s to the $30 trillion tower of the same that now gyrates heavily over the land.

That’s a 60X gain in debt over just two decades in an “economy” that has no honest financial markets; no legal system and tradition of bankruptcy and financial discipline; and a banking system that functions as an arm of the state, cascading credit down from the top in order to “print” an exact amount of GDP each month on the theory that anything that can be built, should be built in order to hit Beijing’s targets.

If an economy and its ruling regime were an animate being you could call it a “fatal addiction” and be done with it. These folks are on the deadliest strain of financial heroin known to mankind and have no chance of surviving; its a dead economy walking.

Look no further than the hideous debt gains reported for the month of January. Total social financing rose by 3.42 trillion yuan or a round one half trillion USD.

That’s right. On top of it tottering $30 trillion debt tower China has just piled on new debt at a $6 trillion annual rate or 55% of GDP per year!

By now China’s businesses—–especially the giant SOEs (state owned enterprises)—— are drowning in excess capacity and unpayable debt that amounts to upwards of 180% of GDP (compared to 70% in the US). But never mind. New loans to the business sector in January were up by 73 percent over prior year.

Worse still, it is evident that a high share of January’s lunatic rate of credit expansion was devoted to paying interest on the existing monumental debts of China’s businesses and so-called local government financing vehicles (LGFVs).  Even the authorities concede that more than 60% of new debt issuance in recent years has been used to pay interest. They are chasing their tail ever more furiously; they are strapped on to a debt whirligig they can’t and won’t get off…….until it finally explodes.

In truth, China’s economy is no more efficient, productive, stable or prosperous than was Stalin’s five-year plan GDP. The latter, by the way, grew at fulsome double digit rates the West envied for more than a decade during the 1930s.

The only difference is that the Red Suzerains of Beijing seem to have learned about the advantages of using a printing press and “bankers” to carry out their central planning  schemes rather than tonnage quotas and commissars; and also that swapping quasi-slave labor in their export factories for IOU’s from its customers in the US and Europe could temporarily relieve the misery and poverty that Mao had consigned to the hundreds of millions trapped in China’s collectivist rice paddies.

Needless to say, having built a massive potemkin economy, China’s rulers have no clue about how to contain the incendiary pressures which are now building to the ignition point. Indeed, since there are no possible economic mechanisms or even viable half-assed statist schemes to stabilize the $30 trillion mountain of debt that sits precariously on its fracturing hothouse economy, or to relieve it of its fatal debt addiction, Beijing will soon have no alterative but to rule by the brute force of paddy wagons, and even firing squads.

The days during which a giant daisy chain of ever inflating lending and spending was raising all boats is over and done. There is nothing ahead except a collapsing credit bubble which will be sinking the great Red Ponzi boat and its 1.3 billion passengers. And along with it, a worldwide economy and financial system afflicted with the plenary misrule being brought to Shanghai by the G-20.

As to the former, China’s looming crash landing could not have been made more clear than by the telltale missive recently sent to the Beijing inner circle by a high official of their own central bank. According to the Wall Street Journal, China’s money printers now realize continued reliance on easy credit could blow the system sky-high and turn the current trillion dollar capital flight into a uncontrollable torrent. So the central bankers are demanding that the fiscal arm of the state dramatically increase its own spending and borrowing:

In a recommendation to China’s top policy makers reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, a senior official at the People’s Bank of China wrote that the government should let the shortfall reach 4% or so, which could allow authorities to slash taxes on businesses to free up more of their funds for investments.

 

“Fiscal policy hasn’t been proactive enough,” said Sheng Songcheng, head of the survey and statics department at the central bank and the lead author of the recommendation, in an interview Thursday. “The concern over increasing the fiscal deficit is that it could lead to a fiscal crisis. But our research shows otherwise…..”

 

.A combination of factors would work in Beijing’s favor if it were to sharply expand the fiscal scope. The debt held by the central government as a percentage of GDP has been declining in the past few years, from 19.4% in 2007 to 15.1% in 2014, according to Mr. Sheng’s report…..”China has room to expand its fiscal deficit to 4% or even 4.5% even if the GDP growth rate drops to 5%,” Mr. Sheng said in the interview.

Now isn’t that pettifoggery perfectly ridiculous. As a purely statistical matter, China’s true central government fiscal debt is not even close to 15% of GDP or just under $2 trillion. It’s actually nearly $11 trillion or 100% of GDP, and that’s on the phony, bloated GDP total published by Beijing on the last day of each quarter—-never to be revised again, world without end.

Here’s why. There is no difference whatsoever between the state and the economy in the Red Ponzi. China’s hideously bloated $30 trillion banking system—including trillions of off-balance sheet loans through wealth management products, entrusted loans, receivables financing and many more crooked devices—-would not last a week without state backing. That means that even if the embedded loan loss rate in the system is just 15%, there is already another $4.5 trillion claim on China’s central government balance sheet. Sooner or later Beijing will be forced to bailout the banks.

Likewise, the entirety of the $3.5 trillion of acknowledged LGFV debt—-and probably the number is far higher in actuality—–would blow up in an instant were it not for Beijing’s implicit backing. On top of that there is the need for trillions more to be reserved for the cost of massively downsizing and restructuring China’s vastly overbuilt industrial plant, beginning with the steel industry and all its upstream and downstream supply chain partners.

The Red Suzerains have built themselves 1.2 billion tons of steel capacity, or more than that of the rest of the planet combined. Yet they have supportable demand for only 500 million tons per year, and that’s only if they can manage to prevent total economic anarchy and entropy. By their own recent announcement they plan to take out 150 million tons—or well more than the steel industry of Europe— and to make massive adjustment payments to the millions or workers, families and communities which will be dislocated.

But even that won’t cut it. Once the world goes Full Donald against the current 100 million ton flood of dumped Chinese steel exports, the central government will have to spend tens of billions more to support payrolls in several hundred million tons of additional steel plants which will have no customers.

At the end of the day, however, it does not matter under which pea China shuffles its gargantuan debt. The Red Ponzi is a unitary house of economic cards, meaning that the discussion which will occur between the Jack Lew’s and Christine Lagarde’s of the G-20 and their Chinese interlocutors this weekend is utterly pointless.

Even the Chinese rulers know the truth about the state’s immense shadow debt as summarized above. They will therefore be exceedingly reluctant to expand the official deficit much beyond 3% of GDP, but prodded by today’s timely leak from the People Printing Press (e.g. central bank) you can be sure that the G-20 visiting squad of clueless Keynesian apparatchiks will demand 4% to help the world avoid the China slowdown bullet. Much time will be spent dickering on the decimal points in between.

Talk about playing tiddlywinks on the deck of the Titanic! The G-20 will come and go without even engaging on the enormity of the ticking financial time bombs which will surround them.

And they will also, thankfully, probably never even get around to an even stupider grand scheme now resident in Christine Lagarde’s purse, which was also conveniently leaked to the WSJ, as follows:

The problem is figuring out how to revive demand in a world where central banks are running out of gas and most of the world’s biggest growth engines are downshifting, idling or struggling to get out of first gear. The solution, many G-20 officials have indicated in recent days, is a stronger effort to restructure stagnating economies and increase investment in infrastructure.

 

As central banks vie to gain traction, some investors are calling for the G-20 to orchestrate a coordinated exchange-rate adjustment. Under one idea, world powers would agree to allow China to devalue the yuan to spur growth in the world’s No. 2 economy, Europe would encourage public spending and the U.S. would help stabilize emerging markets by providing short-term emergency credit lines.

Well, no, not at all. The Chinese would not touch this with the world’s longest bamboo pole because they know it would be a signal for massive capital flight. Likewise, can socialist, sclerotic Europe—–already buried in public debt at well more than 100% of eurozone GDP if you take Germany out of the equation, which would never agree anyway—-borrow the global economy back to prosperity?

And good luck with lame duck Obama getting a GOP congress to make bridge loans to the likes of Brazil and Indonesia.

Yes, take cover. There is a Red Swan rising and its soon going to be circling the entire economic globe.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1UoXoIP Tyler Durden

US Oil Rig Count Plunges To Lowest Since Dec 2009

For the 10th week in a row (14th in last 15), the US oil rig count declined (down 13 to 400) to its lowest since Dec 2009. For now oil prices are undecided as while efficiency trumps the actual decline, the fact that the rig count is dropping so fast suggests production may come under pressure sooner rather than later.

  • *U.S. OIL RIG COUNT DOWN 13 TO 400, BAKER HUGHES SAYS

As the rig count tracks lagged oil prices perfectly…

 

Oil is unsure how to react for now…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1QC3HTv Tyler Durden

Should You Be Allowed to Gene Edit Your Kids?: New at Reason

GeneEditKidsIn the old days, eugenicists justified restrictions on reproduction by arguing that we need to weed out people with unhealthy traits and thus protect the greater health of society. In 1927, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court infamously ruled in Buck v. Bell that the state of Virginia could force a poor woman to be sterilized. In his decision, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes declared: “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.”

This eugenic reasoning has been turned on its head in the early 21st century. Contemporary eugenicists want to use government power to prevent people from using modern biotech methods to help them to bear children who are unburdened of inherited disease and debility. This modern prohibition is also justified on the grounds that it is needed to protect the greater health of society. How horribly ironic!

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/21xnprr
via IFTTT

Chris Christie Throws His Weight Behind Donald Trump Campaign

ChristieSens. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz went hard as hell against Donald Trump last night, calling him out for everything from hiring illegal immigrants to being sued over his “Trump University” real estate training programs. Rubio kept at it this morning, mocking Trump by reading his misspelled, mangled tweets out loud at a rally in Texas.

But never let it be said that Trump isn’t a quick thinker. He came out with a press conference in Texas joined by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, whose own attempt to run for president ended in New Hampshire after he failed to catch fire with the electorate. He was there to endorse Trump for president:

“He’s been my friend for many years, he’s been a spectacular governor,” said Mr. Trump, standing with Mr. Christie at a press conference in Fort Worth, Texas, for the announcement.

“I am proud to be here to endorse Donald Trump,” said Mr. Christie, noting they have been friends for a decade.

Mr. Trump “will do exactly what needs to be done to make America a leader around the world again,” said Mr. Christie.

Via The New York Times.

It probably shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise, given that both men are bombastic authoritarians who think their charisma can paper over shortcomings of their policies (Christie was wrong, but we can’t yet say the same for Trump). Christie’s debate shtick was to look directly into the camera to seem more personable and to interrupt any actual discussion of policy by the candidates who were also senators to complain about them just “talking” about issues and not actually doing anything. The last thing he did of note in the race was to get Rubio some negative attention by pointing out Rubio’s tendency to keep repeating talking points (which Rubio has clearly learned from and used it against Trump just last night).

For libertarian conservatives Christie has been a non-starter with terrible positions on surveillance, military intervention, and medical marijuana. He and Sen. Rand Paul attacked each other when the two men were on stage together.  

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1QitofY
via IFTTT

Being Establishment Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry for Regime Change in the Name of ‘Stability’

We're ALL John Kasich now! ||| Cinema ScopeWhile campaigning endlessly (and successfully!) in New Hampshire, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, the media-christened “moderate” with the spectacularly interventionist foreign policy agenda, began floating the idea of “regime change” in Stalinist North Korea. “What do we do to try to foster that?” he mused on at least one occasion. This on top of Kasich’s plans to go “massively” with a land war against ISIS, removing Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, and enforcing a no-fly zone over Syria against Russia, for starters.

At last night’s GOP presidential debate, CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer asked Kasich a sensible follow-up question: “[T]he commander of American forces in South Korea said that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un would use a weapon of mass destruction if he thought his regime was being threatened. You have said the United States should start examining a strategy of regime change in North Korea. Let’s be clear. Are you talking about getting rid of Kim Jong Un?”

Note that Blitzer was calling both for clarity of position, and engagement with the concern that trying to topple the murderous millennial would provoke a nuclear war. Kasich’s initial answer was a tautological beaut: “When you talk about regime change, Wolf, it means regime change. That’s what it means.” Thanks for clearing that up.

Ol’ Hand-Paddles then quickly detoured into intercepting ships and aircraft, tightening sanctions, arming NoKo’s neighbors, pressuring the Chinese and so forth, before cycling back and insisting now that “regime change” maybe doesn’t have a plain English meaning after all:

[W]hen I say regime change, I don’t have to talk exactly what that means. Look, I’ve been involved in national security for a long time; you don’t have to spell everything out. But what I’m telling you is you look for any means you can to be able to solve that problem in North Korea, and in the meantime put the pressure on the Chinese….They are the key to being able to settle this situation.

Blitzer pressed on: “Would you risk war for a regime change?”

When opportunity's rockin', don't bother knockin'! ||| The InterviewKasich responded with perhaps the craziest line in a debate full of ’em:

Wolf, again, it would depend exactly what, you know, what was happening; what the situation was. But if there was an opportunity to remove the leader of North Korea and create stability? Because, I’ll tell you, you keep kicking the can down the road we’re going to face this sooner or later.

But in the meantime, I’m also aware of the fact that there’s 10 million people living in Seoul, so you don’t just run around making charges. I have put it on the table that I would love to see regime change in North Korea.

Now, perhaps the Chinese can actually accomplish that with this man who is now currently the leader, but the fact is we have to bring everything to bear. We have to be firm, and we’ve got to unite those people in that part of the world to stand firmly against North Korea, and make sure we have the ballistic missile technology to defend ourselves.

Set aside all the incoherence and self-contradiction here—the Chinese can maybe accomplish regime change in conjunction with North Korea’s current leader?—and instead focus on that one bolded line. John Kasich is suggesting, after 15 years of chaos in the wake of U.S.-led regime changes around the globe, that this time when we decapitate the dictatorial government of a lousy country it will finally produce that long-lost unicorn of stability. Sorry, Lindsey Graham, there’s your “batshit crazy.”

Last night, as in most every GOP debate (except that Chris Christie one), the media declared Marco Rubio the winner. This time it was even true! But an underacknowledged reason why political journalists feel more comfortable with the guy is that he speaks their language: policy fluency, grown-up concerns about long-term fiscal choices, a convincing-for-the-genre rap about the American Dream, and an alleged Seriousness about foreign policy. And make no mistake—what comprises that seriousness is equal parts surfacely impressive knowledge about a variety of global hotspots, and just straight-up, unrestrained hawkishness. It’s true of Rubio, it’s true of Lindsey Graham, it’s true of everyone else who has run for president in the establishment lane. Including the last Rubio-competitor standing there, John Kasich.

Wanna impress your journalist friends? Learn how to pronounce the various exotic factions you intend to either arm or bomb. Exaggerate threats constantly, re-write your own disastrous foreign policy preferences as need be. It’s not like they’re gonna check! Not as long as you remember to keep reminding them that you’re not one of those crazy people, from or popular among the conservative grassroots, who are fed up in a less-than-perfectly-fluent way with America’s never-resolving wars.

The State newspaper in Columbia, South Carolina, when endorsing Kasich ahead of his thrilling fourth-place, 7.6 percent finish in the Palmetto State, fell for the he’s-not-crazy act hook, line and sinker:

He refuses to pander to those upset about our nation’s leadership. Rather than turning Americans’ concerns into anger, he prefers to be positive. The United States fundamentally is in great shape, he says, although the country has problems. He believes those can be solved with proper leadership that includes listening, educating, and working with both Democrats and Republicans.

He’s not angry, he just wants to carry out regime change all over the globe in the name of “stability,” silly! This, at long last, is what America’s political class considers “moderate.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/24tdwgJ
via IFTTT