Review: Ecstasy


Webp.net-resizeimage (6)

In her dreamlike first feature, Brazilian director Moara Passonni uses action—especially the noisy street demos of her country’s recent political past—as background. The movie’s unswerving focus is a quiet young girl named Clara, who on the cusp of puberty is sinking into extreme anorexia. “This week Manu got her period and she cried her heart out,” Clara says of a classmate early on. “I can’t imagine myself with breasts.” Why does no one notice what’s happening to this person? “My body is like a scream,” she says

Passoni’s story, set in São Paulo around the end of the 1980s, is autobiographical. (The director herself was once seriously anorexic but lived to tell.) Clara’s mother is a former nun impelled toward social action in the backwash of the country’s 20-year military dictatorship. She runs for the National Congress and wins, and soon moves with Clara to the country’s sleekly soulless capital of Brasilia. (“How could this place be home?” Clara wonders, taking in the city’s cold concrete vistas.)

Adolescence turns Clara increasingly inward. Her mother, seeing her daughter shunned after kissing another girl on the mouth, enrolls her in ballet school, where the importance of body weight looms large and Clara begins surreptitiously dumping food rather than eating it. She seems weird to the other girls and remains friendless.

By the age of 15, Clara weighs 64 pounds and has stopped menstruating. Doctors put her on lithium, then administer a “light” course of electro-shock, but nothing reels her back from the edge of impending collapse. Attempts at force-feeding only puncture her intestines. “If I have a problem,” she says, “it’s the less I eat, the more energy I have.” This regimen keeps her in a constant state of counterfeit ecstasy to which she desperately adheres. Nothing dispels her loneliness, though. “I’m making a cage of bones to keep my heart inside,” she says. A doctor tells her, “If you don’t eat, you’ll die.” Clara happily signs a waiver to get out of the hospital, so she can continue slowly killing herself without outside interference.

Director Passoni and her cinematographer, Janice D’Avila, wreathe the story in a retrospective haze that gently draws us into this melancholy tale. And the actors who play Clara at different ages give unusually affecting performances. (They include Victoria Maranho, Gigi Paladino, Alice Valares, and Susana Prizendt.) The silent nightmare of anorexia is straightforwardly portrayed and not sensationalized. We see Clara wordlessly contemplating her naked body as if it were a hostile foreign land. We watch as she fantasizes trimming “fat” off her abdomen with a pair of scissors, and we look on in alarm at a photo parade of real-life anorexic women, whose bones serve mainly as armatures for the bags of skin their bodies have become.

Even within Clara’s cramped world of morbid self-deprivation, life’s traditional distractions still beckon. There’s a boy, and a nightclub, and hints of sex and love. But Clara won’t be drawn in too deep. “The problem with allowing myself pleasure,” she says, “is that it creates desire.” What she most wants, we’re told, is “to be 100 percent autonomous, like a statue.”

Ecstasy will be streaming as part of the MoMA Doc festival from March 28 through April 2). You have to become a member, though. The film doesn’t have U.S. distribution yet, but keep an eye out.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2QKlpBz
via IFTTT

Two Trains Collide In Egypt, Reports Say

Two Trains Collide In Egypt, Reports Say

Egypt Today reports two trains have collided in Sohag, Upper Egypt, “resulting in derailing three passenger carriages.” There were reports of at least 50 people injured, according to Sputnik News

Reporting of the incident is scant at the moment, but Twitter users have been uploading alleged images of what appears to be passenger railway cars derailed in a twisted mess. 

Here are more photos of the incident. 

Poor Egypt this week, first the Suez Canal crisis and now Sohag. 

*This story is developing… 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 03/26/2021 – 07:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/31m5pru Tyler Durden

Suez Canal Crisis Morphs Into Global Supply Chain Wrecking Ball 

Suez Canal Crisis Morphs Into Global Supply Chain Wrecking Ball 

The world got another wake-up call this week about the overreliance on complex global supply chains. As of Friday, the massive containership, “Ever Given,” remains stuck in the canal, unable to be refloated, paralyzing the world’s most important shipping lane. 

Ever Given is one of the world’s largest containerships, with approximately 20,000 shipping containers of goods. The shipping lane is a vital linkage between Asian factories and customers in Europe and the US. 

Reuters reports the Suez Canal Authority (SCA) is looking forward to cooperating with the US to refloat the stranded containership that has blocked the canal since Tuesday. 

“The Suez Canal Authority (SCA) values the offer of the United States of America to contribute to these efforts, and looks forward to cooperating with the US in this regard,” it said in a statement.

Shoei Kisen, the Japanese owner of the ship blocking the Suez Canal, aims to dislodge the vessel from the canal bank by Saturday. But as Bloomberg reports, the process to refloat the ship could “take until at least next Wednesday.” 

Peter Berdowski, CEO of Dutch company Boskalis who has been tasked with dislodging the vessel, warned Ever Given “could be stuck in the canal for weeks.” 

So actual timelines on when the vessel will be unstuck are unclear. The blockage is wreaking havoc across global supply chains, and crude prices were higher on Friday morning on mounting fears the containership will be stuck for much longer than initially anticipated. Since the containership got stuck on Tuesday, crude prices have been chopping around 57-handle to 61-handle. 

On Friday, tugboats and suction dredger crews worked around the vessel’s front hull to remove sediment. The task to refloat the 200,000-ton ship may involve removing containers to lessen the vessel’s weight. 

Since Tuesday, tugs and diggers have been unsuccessful in attempting to refloat the stranded vessel. As hundreds of ships pile up on either end of the canal entrances – A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and Hapag-Lloyd AG have instructed their vessels to take alternative routes to avoid the canal. Vessels have been instructed to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. 

The canal is one of the world’s most important shipping lanes, with 12% of global trade and 8% of liquefied natgas traverse the canal and nearly two million oil barrels each day. Every day the canal is blocked, it halts about $9.6 billion of trade.

“The number of ships loaded with billions of dollars worth of goods waiting to traverse the canal has risen to more than 300,” according to Bloomberg data.

Reeling from the blockage, marine freight rates are surging this week as companies race to find alternative shipping lanes. 

According to Bloomberg, the cost to ship a 40-ft. container from China to Europe has risen to $8,000, up 4x year-over-year. Suezmax vessels, which carry about 1 million barrels of crude, are now chartering for approximately $17,000 per day, the most since summer 2020. 

Reuters notes the Black Sea to Mediterranean fuel shipping rates rose this week as traders attempt to bypass the blocked Suez canal.

On top of an already stretched global supply chain, manufacturers in Asia are already preparing for extended shipping delays due to the blockage. To get an idea of some of the goods that flow through the canal from the East to West, cargo aboard an HMM Co. vessel moored outside the canal is carrying frozen beef, paper, beer, auto components, chocolate, furniture, frozen pork, and other goods. 

Other reports include Caterpillar Inc. is facing shipping delays because of the canal blockage and is considering air freight for certain parts. 

Mark Ma, owner of Seabay International Freight Forwarding Ltd., a company that handles Chinese goods including toys, pillows and mattresses sold on Amazon, has 20 to 30 containers stuck in the canal. 

“If it can’t be resumed in a week, it will be horrible,” said Ma. “We will see freight fares spike again. The products are delayed, containers can’t return to China and we can’t deliver more goods.”

More reports indicate at least 10 LNG vessels from the Middle East with end destinations in Europe have been delayed. 

“Even if the route is liberated within one week, there is a large queue of cargoes lining up to cross the canal,” said Carlos Torres Diaz, Rystad’s head of gas and power markets. “The return to normal flow will take some time.”

The knock on effects of the blockage is rippling through the global supply chain and is the “worst-case scenario” for global trade. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 03/26/2021 – 07:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2PwoKTS Tyler Durden

Florida Cops Sued for Hassling People Over Crimes They Might Commit in the Future


zumaamericasten073927

Predictive policing—a concept seemingly pulled straight from the 2002 popcorn flick Minority Report—has become increasingly hot with law enforcement agencies over the past decade. The field tempts budget-minded officeholders and cops alike with its science-y promise to forecast where crimes will occur in the future and who will commit them, targeting risk while minimizing wasted resources. But it also holds the potential to justify hassling people based on what a computer program and biases entered as data say they might someday do. That’s the basis of a recent lawsuit charging that a Florida sheriff’s department has used predictive policing to harass the innocent.

“Predictive policing is the use of analytical techniques to identify promising targets for police intervention with the goal of preventing crime, solving past crimes, and identifying potential offenders and victims,” according to a 2013 RAND Corporation report. Even in those early days of the field, though, the report acknowledged that “[t]he very act of labeling areas and people as worthy of further law enforcement attention inherently raises concerns about civil liberties and privacy rights.”

In 2012, Reason‘s Ron Bailey observed that the developing field had some promise. But he warned that “[t]he accuracy of predictive policing programs depends on the accuracy of the information they are fed” and that “we should always keep in mind that any new technology that helps the police to better protect citizens can also be used to better oppress them.”

Fast-forward a few years, and we have those concerns fulfilled in spades.

“Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco took office in 2011 with a bold plan: to create a cutting-edge intelligence program that could stop crime before it happened,” the Tampa Bay Times reported last September. “What he actually built was a system to continuously monitor and harass Pasco County residents.”

How does the Pasco County program live up to everybody’s worst fears of acting on predictions of what people haven’t done but might do?

“First the Sheriff’s Office generates lists of people it considers likely to break the law, based on arrest histories, unspecified intelligence and arbitrary decisions by police analysts,” the newspaper’s report noted. “Then it sends deputies to find and interrogate anyone whose name appears, often without probable cause, a search warrant or evidence of a specific crime.”

“Make their lives miserable until they move or sue,” is how a former deputy described the department’s tactics to reporters.

Now a group of county residents, represented by the Institute for Justice, is suing the county over the department’s conduct. They describe years of harassing visits by cops who dropped by because the system identified them as potential offenders. When the residents lost patience with the continued police presence in their lives, officers deployed the red tape of the endless regulatory state against them to encourage compliance or to simply cause pain.

“Code enforcement is a common tactic to compel cooperation,” reports the Institute for Justice. “One deputy said they would ‘literally go out there and take a tape measure and measure the grass if somebody didn’t want to cooperate with us.’ In Robert’s case, deputies cited him for tall grass, but failed to notify him of the citation. Then, when he failed to appear for a hearing that he was never told was happening, they arrested him for failure to appear.”

The citations didn’t have to stick to work as intended. The slow torture of tickets, arrests, and disrupted lives drove some to pick up and move out of Pasco County to avoid harassment—by that particular department, at least.

The Pasco County lawsuit isn’t the first filed over predictive policing, though it appears to be the only one to-date that addresses how the approach is used in practice. Given the field’s relative youth, other lawsuits have sought transparency on just what sort of information and calculations are used to make predictions. Many civil liberties advocates are concerned that shiny tech talk is being used to add a scientific gloss to what police already want to do.

“[W]hile big data companies claim that their technologies can help remove bias from police decision-making, algorithms relying on historical data risk reproducing those very biases,” worries Tim Lau of the Brennan Center for Justice, which sued the New York City Police Department for information about its predictive policing program.

“[I]n numerous jurisdictions, these systems are built on data produced during documented periods of flawed, racially biased, and sometimes unlawful practices and policies,” argues a 2019 NYU Law Review article by researchers with the university’s AI Now Institute. “If predictive policing systems are informed by such data, they cannot escape the legacies of the unlawful or biased policing practices that they are built on.”

Those policing systems can affect a lot of lives. Over five years, the Pasco County predictive program targeted almost 1,000 people, according to the Tampa Bay Times. Roughly 10 percent of those targeted were younger than 18, and some had only one or two arrests to bring them to the attention of the authorities. Once on the radar, those in the system receive repeated visits at all hours of the day and are at the receiving end of tickets or handcuffs at the slightest excuse. Given the spider’s web of laws and regulations in which Americans now live, police have no difficulty finding a reason to fine or arrest those who their algorithms say are worthy of special attention.

Has the torment of some county residents at least made others safer? That doesn’t seem to be the case.

“Pasco’s drop in property crimes was similar to the decline in the seven-largest nearby police jurisdictions,” the newspaper’s September report noted. “Over the same time period, violent crime increased only in Pasco.”

Whatever the field’s potential for channeling law enforcement effort to where it’s most needed, and away from places it’s unnecessary, predictive policing has become just another excuse for the authorities to hammer those who rub them the wrong way.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/39hLnCG
via IFTTT

“Boycott Georgia” – Furious Dems React As Gov. Kemp Signs “Election Integrity” Bill

“Boycott Georgia” – Furious Dems React As Gov. Kemp Signs “Election Integrity” Bill

Democrats are furious after Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp last night signed an election bill that requires strengthening voting rules in the Peach State by limiting the number of ballot drop boxes, establishing photo ID requirements for absentee voters, and prohibiting distribution of food and drinks to voters waiting in line.

Just an hour before the signing, the GOP-controlled Georgia General Assembly passed the bill on a party-line vote as Democrats, including elected representatives from around the state, gathered to protest. The backlash was intense, and during the scuffle, at least one lawmaker was arrested, with video of her being led away by police going viral.

The bill is just one of dozens being considered in state capitols around the country in the wake of last year’s presidential election, where signs of irregularities in states like PA, MI and even GA were repeatedly ignored by Democrats. Recently, the Washington Post recanted a story where it claimed that President Trump had personally pressured Georgia election officials, drawing a heated response from Trump himself.

According to a summary from the Hill, the bill includes sweeping changes to the state’s voting rules and procedures.

It would require voters to provide a driver’s license or state-issued ID card number to request and submit absentee ballots, and it would curtail the use of ballot drop boxes, limiting their placement to early-voting locations and making them accessible only while the precinct is open.

The legislation also gives the Georgia State Elections Board the ability to effectively take over county elections boards in areas that it determines are in need of oversight. The secretary of state would also be removed as chair of the State Elections Board, a proposal that critics say would strip the state’s top elections official of a key power.

The bill also takes aim at the state’s absentee-ballot request period, setting the deadline for voters to request absentee ballots at 11 days before an election. It also calls for prohibiting people from giving food or drinks to voters waiting in line to cast their ballots.

Democrats slammed the bill, and others like it that are circulating in other states, as retaliation to the GOP’s recent string of losses in critical Senate races (along with the presidential race, as we noted above). Twin victories for Democrats in GA special elections on Jan. 5 helped stoke support for the law, as Democrats relied on aggressive get-out-the-vote campaigns, absentee voting and millions in out-of-state dollars to clinch narrow victories for Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff.

Stacey Abrams, former gubernatorial candidate who has burnished her reputation as a national “voting rights” advocater, predicted a swift passage for the bill, accusing Republican lawmakers of trying to limit public review and awareness of the proposals.

During the chaotic protests held at the capitol Thursday evening as lawmakers in the assembly passed the bill, Georgia State Representative Park Cannon was arrested during a protest at the state capitol last night.

Per the Hill, Cannon was cuffed Thursday after she repeatedly knocked on Gov. Kemp’s office door while he signed the bill.

After the arrest, Sen. Warnock visited Cannon in her holding cell at the Fulton County jail, and told reporters during an impromptu briefing out front that her arrest shouldn’t have happened. “She did not deserve this,” he said, adding that she was “shaken” by what happened.

Calls to boycott the state of Georgia – a playbook used by progressives a few years back after North Carolina passed a “transphobic” bathroom bill – have already started circulating on twitter.

We imagine these calls will be amplified Friday morning by a legion of social media influencers urging their followers to join the boycott.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 03/26/2021 – 07:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2NT0YkA Tyler Durden

Florida Cops Sued for Hassling People Over Crimes They Might Commit in the Future


zumaamericasten073927

Predictive policing—a concept seemingly pulled straight from the 2002 popcorn flick Minority Report—has become increasingly hot with law enforcement agencies over the past decade. The field tempts budget-minded officeholders and cops alike with its science-y promise to forecast where crimes will occur in the future and who will commit them, targeting risk while minimizing wasted resources. But it also holds the potential to justify hassling people based on what a computer program and biases entered as data say they might someday do. That’s the basis of a recent lawsuit charging that a Florida sheriff’s department has used predictive policing to harass the innocent.

“Predictive policing is the use of analytical techniques to identify promising targets for police intervention with the goal of preventing crime, solving past crimes, and identifying potential offenders and victims,” according to a 2013 RAND Corporation report. Even in those early days of the field, though, the report acknowledged that “[t]he very act of labeling areas and people as worthy of further law enforcement attention inherently raises concerns about civil liberties and privacy rights.”

In 2012, Reason‘s Ron Bailey observed that the developing field had some promise. But he warned that “[t]he accuracy of predictive policing programs depends on the accuracy of the information they are fed” and that “we should always keep in mind that any new technology that helps the police to better protect citizens can also be used to better oppress them.”

Fast-forward a few years, and we have those concerns fulfilled in spades.

“Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco took office in 2011 with a bold plan: to create a cutting-edge intelligence program that could stop crime before it happened,” the Tampa Bay Times reported last September. “What he actually built was a system to continuously monitor and harass Pasco County residents.”

How does the Pasco County program live up to everybody’s worst fears of acting on predictions of what people haven’t done but might do?

“First the Sheriff’s Office generates lists of people it considers likely to break the law, based on arrest histories, unspecified intelligence and arbitrary decisions by police analysts,” the newspaper’s report noted. “Then it sends deputies to find and interrogate anyone whose name appears, often without probable cause, a search warrant or evidence of a specific crime.”

“Make their lives miserable until they move or sue,” is how a former deputy described the department’s tactics to reporters.

Now a group of county residents, represented by the Institute for Justice, is suing the county over the department’s conduct. They describe years of harassing visits by cops who dropped by because the system identified them as potential offenders. When the residents lost patience with the continued police presence in their lives, officers deployed the red tape of the endless regulatory state against them to encourage compliance or to simply cause pain.

“Code enforcement is a common tactic to compel cooperation,” reports the Institute for Justice. “One deputy said they would ‘literally go out there and take a tape measure and measure the grass if somebody didn’t want to cooperate with us.’ In Robert’s case, deputies cited him for tall grass, but failed to notify him of the citation. Then, when he failed to appear for a hearing that he was never told was happening, they arrested him for failure to appear.”

The citations didn’t have to stick to work as intended. The slow torture of tickets, arrests, and disrupted lives drove some to pick up and move out of Pasco County to avoid harassment—by that particular department, at least.

The Pasco County lawsuit isn’t the first filed over predictive policing, though it appears to be the only one to-date that addresses how the approach is used in practice. Given the field’s relative youth, other lawsuits have sought transparency on just what sort of information and calculations are used to make predictions. Many civil liberties advocates are concerned that shiny tech talk is being used to add a scientific gloss to what police already want to do.

“[W]hile big data companies claim that their technologies can help remove bias from police decision-making, algorithms relying on historical data risk reproducing those very biases,” worries Tim Lau of the Brennan Center for Justice, which sued the New York City Police Department for information about its predictive policing program.

“[I]n numerous jurisdictions, these systems are built on data produced during documented periods of flawed, racially biased, and sometimes unlawful practices and policies,” argues a 2019 NYU Law Review article by researchers with the university’s AI Now Institute. “If predictive policing systems are informed by such data, they cannot escape the legacies of the unlawful or biased policing practices that they are built on.”

Those policing systems can affect a lot of lives. Over five years, the Pasco County predictive program targeted almost 1,000 people, according to the Tampa Bay Times. Roughly 10 percent of those targeted were younger than 18, and some had only one or two arrests to bring them to the attention of the authorities. Once on the radar, those in the system receive repeated visits at all hours of the day and are at the receiving end of tickets or handcuffs at the slightest excuse. Given the spider’s web of laws and regulations in which Americans now live, police have no difficulty finding a reason to fine or arrest those who their algorithms say are worthy of special attention.

Has the torment of some county residents at least made others safer? That doesn’t seem to be the case.

“Pasco’s drop in property crimes was similar to the decline in the seven-largest nearby police jurisdictions,” the newspaper’s September report noted. “Over the same time period, violent crime increased only in Pasco.”

Whatever the field’s potential for channeling law enforcement effort to where it’s most needed, and away from places it’s unnecessary, predictive policing has become just another excuse for the authorities to hammer those who rub them the wrong way.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/39hLnCG
via IFTTT

LA Cops Attacked With “Rocks, Bottles, And Smoke Bombs” While Trying To Clear Out Homeless Camp

LA Cops Attacked With “Rocks, Bottles, And Smoke Bombs” While Trying To Clear Out Homeless Camp

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

Officers with the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) were attacked with smoke bombs, bottles, and rocks on March 24 as they attempted to clear out a homeless encampment at a park, according to video footage and the LAPD.

“Two unlawful assemblies were declared and dispersal orders were issued at Santa Ynez Street and Glendale Blvd due to officers being assaulted with rocks, bottles, and smoke bombs. Fencing is being installed and police will be there overnight,” the LAPD wrote in a tweet on March 24, adding that officers attempted to clear out Echo Park.

They were met with left-wing protesters, according to video footage of the incident.

The homeless camp has been criticized by citizens who live in the area, prompting the city to say it would move those living in the park to hotels, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Homeless residents say they have a right to stay in the park, which is public property.

“No one else may enter. 24 hr notice for those in the park to leave. Housing resources are being provided to everyone,” Los Angeles Police Chief Michel Moore wrote in a March 24 tweet.

“The Los Angeles Police Department continues to ask for calm and cooperation as the installation of fencing in support of the Echo Park rehabilitation effort continues. Unfortunately, officers have received projectiles and refusals from individuals blocking streets in the area,” the LAPD wrote on Twitter.

Police told KTLA that there was misinformation being spread that officers deployed “tear gas” during the incident, saying that it was instead smoke caused by smoke bombs that were being used by anti-police demonstrators.

The left-wing activist group People’s City Council—Los Angeles wrote of the demonstrations: “YALL ITS GOING DOWN IN ECHO PARK.”

Edward Juarez, a homeless resident, said he has been living in a tent at the park after he lost his job due to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated government-mandated lockdowns. Juarez said he was a photographer at events and concerts, which were closed down amid the lockdown orders, the LA Times reported.

“I just want to get out of here, it’s getting crazy,” he said of the scene.

“The pandemic has not even been lifted and they’re trying to evacuate people who have nothing anymore,” another homeless person, Jessee Mendez, said to KTLA.

Residents have told local outlets that the park is no longer a safe place for children, as they’ve found needles and numerous other health hazards.

A Change.org petition states that Echo Park is “virtually unusable” and is “becoming Skid Row,” referring to the downtown Los Angeles area where a number of homeless people and drug addicts live.

“As of late, activists and the current Los Angeles leadership, have sought to let unhoused peoples use all of the lake facilities and land for housing- Instead of using the $1.2 billion in Prop HHH funds we the voters approved to construct housing for the unhoused (None of which has been built),” the petition states.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 03/26/2021 – 06:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3lSHwRs Tyler Durden

Ava Antibody Explains


minisavaantibody

Ava, the fetching and friendly blue antibody, is the protagonist of Ava Antibody Explains, a timely children’s book written by Andrea Cudd Alemanni and delightfully illustrated by Roman Diaz. Ava is a big player on the body’s immune system team, a force that fights off villains such as the virus Charlie Chickenpox.

Vaccines, the book explains, tell Ava what Charlie looks like so he can’t sneak past her. Because Ashley had her Chickenpox vaccine last year, Charlie couldn’t invade her body: When he tried, Ava and her teammates identified and stopped him before he could make her sick. Ava also explains that “Getting the vaccine helps you keep your friends healthy, too!” Since your antibodies protect you, you won’t accidentally pass bad actors like Charlie on to other kids whose antibodies don’t yet recognize him.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/39dv4qs
via IFTTT