Inside the Campaign to Legalize Magic Mushrooms in California in 2020

On May 7, 2019, Denver voted to become the first city in America to decriminalize magic mushrooms. On June 4, 2019, Oakland, California, decriminalized all psychedelic plants and fungi. On January 28, 2020, the neighboring Bay Area city of Santa Cruz followed suit. And now statewide efforts are underway in Washington state, Oregon, and California.

“When it comes to psychedelics, we feel people should have the freedom of choice,” says Ryan Dunevar, the head of Decriminalize California. “In essence, cognitive liberty.” 

Now the group wants to take the psychedelic decriminalization movement a step further by convincing California voters not only to deprioritize enforcement of laws against the possession and consumption of psychedelics but to create a legal framework for commercial sales via ballot initiative.

“We realized, all right, let’s make sure nobody else goes to jail for this. Let’s give it a proper, regulated system,” says Dunevar. “And we realized in order to do that, you’d actually have to, in essence, legalize sales.”

But this approach is controversial within the movement. “We led from a place of love—that is we didn’t push commodification. We pushed equitable access and just decriminalizing our relationship with nature,” says Carlos Plazola, head of Decriminalize Nature. “The city basically said, ‘We recognize the healing effect of these plants.’ So the citizenry hears that and says, ‘Oh, I’m, I’m curious now.’ And because it’s sanctioned…people are stepping into those healing spaces with less fear,” says Plazola.

Plazola is a veteran political operative in Oakland who runs his operation out of the Haven, a community center that serves as a hub for members of the Bay Area’s psychedelic community. They gather to share their experiences and participate in so-called integrative circles.

“People come and talk about their psychedelic experiences and unpack them in a supportive group setting,” says Danielle Negrin of San Francisco Psychedelic Society.

The gatherings are geared towards those who’ve had intense trips and want to share information about the application of psychedelics in therapy and addiction treatment, says Negrin.

“Decriminalization is a risk reduction strategy,” says Larry Norris of ERIE, which also facilitates integration circles. “We’re allowing people to feel less concerned about the risk they might [face] for coming out.” 

Norris favors decriminalization over legalization, in part because the latter would require the state to create a regulatory framework.

“We believe in an inalienable right to have our own relationship to nature,” says Norris. “There’s no reason for us to have to go to a dispensary or go to a pharmaceutical company to get the things that we can grow out of the ground.”

Dr. Charles Grob, director of adolescent and child psychiatry at UCLA-Harborside, is worried that the decriminalization and legalization movements could undermine the significant progress made in the field of psychedelic research.

“My concern is, to what degree will it attract the attention of individuals who…don’t understand how to optimally structure the experience,” says Charles Grob, who co-authored a landmark study involving the dosing of terminal cancer patients with psilocybin.

Grob wants psychedelics to be used primarily in clinical settings for now.

“What we observed [in the cancer study] was that our subjects…were in [a] great existential crisis. Their sense of self had eroded….There was often a sense of loss of meaning, loss of purpose,” says Grob.

He says that after one to two psychotherapy-assisted psilocybin sessions, patients showed a measurable decrease in anxiety and were often able to “reestablish that sense of self, continuity with the previous parts of their lives, and strengthen their sense of meaning and purpose.”

Grob is one of many scientists doing psychedelic research, a field that has experienced several breakthroughs in recent years thanks to the decades-long effort of the Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies (MAPS).

MAPS has funded studies treating PTSD in veterans with MDMA, more commonly known as ecstasy. The results were so promising that the FDA designated it a “breakthrough therapy,” fast-tracking the approval process so that the treatment could be available by as early as 2021, pending completion of phase 3 clinical trials.

Grob is wary of making psychedelics available for purchase to the public without guidance from experienced professionals in a clinical setting.

“Nothing is without risk,” says Grob, who has published research about adverse interactions between certain psychedelics and SSRI antidepressants. 

“Some people are simply too vulnerable,” says Grob. “Some individuals have some underlying risk for psychotic illness….[Users] need to be in a very quiet setting, ideally out in nature, but protected. You’re with someone at all times who is not tripping.” 

But Dunevar from Decriminalize California worries that legalizing only medical uses would be too restrictive.

The cost of therapy “eliminates a lot of people, which means basically only rich white people would be able to use it,” says Dunevar.

Norris agrees that barriers to entry need to be lowered.

“This is a people’s movement,” says Norris.”There’s a much broader range of people who maybe can’t get into the cultural ethos of a clinical system, maybe can’t afford a clinical system.” 

And Negrin points out that people have long been consuming psychedelics and that they will continue to do so, regardless of the legal status.

“It’s been happening for thousands of years. People have been working with psychedelics and healing with these medicines,” she says. “Are we going to accept that that’s happening or are we going to ignore that that’s happening?”

Grob acknowledges that psychedelics have been used “since time immemorial by indigenous peoples,” but says that in those cultures they were used “within the context of ritual ceremony.”

“We live in a very different culture, where all bets are off, and a lot of the built-in safety features you’re going to find in indigenous cultures surrounding the use of powerful sacred plants do not necessarily exist.”

The California attorney general’s office approved the psychedelic legalization initiative’s language in early January, and the campaign is currently collecting the 625,000 signatures it needs to qualify for the ballot. Dunevar believes this is the biggest challenge the campaign will face.

“This thing is won or lost in the next five months as it is,” says Dunevar.  

Plazola hopes that the decriminalization movement doesn’t stop with Oakland, with California, or with the U.S.

“My hope for the next five years for the decriminalization movement is that it’s an international movement, that it’s being talked about at the United Nations,” says Plazola. Psychedelics “never should have been made illegal to begin with, nor should any relationship between humans and nature be made illegal.”

Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by John Osterhoust, James Lee Marsh, and Weissmueller. Additional sound editing by Ian Keyser. 

Photo credits: Magic mushroom in the forest, Photo 42494972 © Kmetix, Dreamstime.com

 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2ueF1mh
via IFTTT

Boeing 767 Makes Emergency Landing After Part Of Landing Gear Falls Off; Stock Slides

Boeing 767 Makes Emergency Landing After Part Of Landing Gear Falls Off; Stock Slides

Facing dire, if not terminal, issues with its 737 MAX which may or may not fly again (ideally with passengers not at gunpoint), while cutting production on the 787 Dreamliner due to slumping demand, at least Boeing’s legacy long haul workhorse, the 767, had managed to fly between the cracks, so to speak.

No more. Moments ago Boeing stock promptly dropped into the red after Spanish airport operator AENA said that a Boeing 767 aircraft flown by Air Canada was returning to Adolfo Suarez Madrid-Barajas airport for an emergency landing on Monday after reporting a “technical issue”. The airliner called air traffic control 30 minutes after takeoff and requested a slot for an emergency landing, an AENA spokeswoman told Reuters.

A subsequent report clarified that the technical issue involved a part of landing gear falling off and entering the airplane’s engine.

Spain’s main pilots union Sepla posted a tweet saying a Boeing 767 aircraft flown by Air Canada was returning to Madrid airport for an emergency landing after part of its landing gear fell off and entered its engines

Spain’s air navigation manager Enaire confirmed: “A flight with a technical problem is circling Madrid before returning to Adolfo Suarez Madrid Barajas airport.”

A spokesman for a regional government-run emergency services coordinator said: “We have sent various emergency response resources to the airport because of problems with a plane.”

A spokesman for the airport operator said: “The airport is on standby to receive flight Air Canada flight AK837 which was bound for Toronto.”

In kneejerk reaction, Boeing stock slumped to session lows, briefly dropping in the red as Boeing’s troubles appear to never end.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:19

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RVoj4c Tyler Durden

Coronavirus: How Bad Will It Get?

Coronavirus: How Bad Will It Get?

Authored by Adam Taggart via PeakProsperity.com,

The official data on the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus continues to suggest a geometric growth rate.

Which explains why more and more infectious disease experts are now openly calling the virus a full-blown global pandemic.

So how bad might things get?

It’s worth noting at this point that the data we do have, mostly from the Chinese government, is still scant and suspect. Many think the situation is China is worse than is being reported — potentially much worse.

Frustratingly, the Western press seems bent on downplaying the coronavirus threat, many trying to convince us that the standard flu is more dangerous. Which is NOT true, at least in terms of survivability.

So, we must continue to educate ourselves as best we can.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 11:16

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RT0nhZ Tyler Durden

Senate To Call ‘Whistleblower’ As Part Of Three-Pronged Investigation Into Impeachment Origins

Senate To Call ‘Whistleblower’ As Part Of Three-Pronged Investigation Into Impeachment Origins

Senate Republicans are gearing up for a three-pronged investigation into the origins of Congressional Democrats’ impeachment of President Trump, according to the Washington Examiner.

I want to understand how all this crap started,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures, who added that the Senate would begin their investigations “within weeks.”

“The Senate Intel Committee under Richard Burr has told us that they will call the whistleblower,” said Graham.

Whether it’s a legitimate search for the truth or a convenient way to assuage frustrated Republicans who wanted fireworks during the Senate impeachment trial has yet to be seen.

Let’s recall what Senate Republicans plan to unravel;

The Whistelblower, outed by investigative reporter Paul Sperry as Eric Ciaramella, is a registered Democrat who worked for then-VP Joe Biden, former CIA Director John Brennan, and was appointed by former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in June, 2017 as his personal aide according to RedState. Ciaramella, who radio host Rush Limbaugh called “essentially a spy for John Brennan,” was also a frequent visitor to the Obama White House.

In November, the Washington Examiner reported: “It is likely that the whistleblower traveled on Air Force Two at least one of the six visits that Biden made to Ukraine.

If the whistleblower is a former employee of — associate of Joe Biden, I think that would be important. If the whistleblower was working with people on Schiff’s staff that wanted to take Trump down a year-and-a-half ago, I think that would be important. If the Schiff staff people helped write the complaint, that would be important. We’re going to get to the bottom of all of this to make sure this never happens again,” said Sen. Graham.

After hearing second-hand about a July 25 call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky in which Trump asked for investigations into the Bidens, Ciaramella approached impeachment chieftain Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA)’s office (which hired two of Ciaramella’s colleagues last year, including Sean Misko, who was hired in August).

Schiff’s team directed Ciaramella to “Coup has started” Democratic operative attorney Mark Zaid (who vowed to “get rid of” Trump in July of 2017), who helped the CIA ‘whistleblower’ file a complaint on a form which had been altered to allow hearsay.

What’s more, at least two of Ciaramella’s colleagues from the National Security Counsel were hired by Schiff’s office last year – including Sean Misko, who was hired in August.

And Schiff continues to deny knowledge of the whistleblower’s identity.

Democrats, pointing to the Trump administration placing a hold on US military aid to Ukraine, unbeknownst to Zelensky, argued that President Trump abused his office and obstructed Congress’ investigation. During last week’s Senate trial, Trump’s attorneys argued that his actions fell far short of impeachable offense.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 10:55

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2RVjfgc Tyler Durden

Trader Warns “Cutting Global Rates Doesn’t Cure Sick People”

Trader Warns “Cutting Global Rates Doesn’t Cure Sick People”

Authored by Richard Breslow via Bloomberg,

On days like today, it’s easy to fall into one of two camps.

You can either look at every move that risk makes and declare it horribly important. Portending something lasting, momentous and dispositive. And demanding to know why someone isn’t doing something to propel stocks higher. Bounces are taken as a blow struck for justice and the wholesome functioning of asset markets as they are meant to be experienced. Sell-offs are seen as unfair.

Or you can be taken as a scold for suggesting that traders, and commentators, get a grip.

This is a moment when we should accept that the calming financial measures taken by the authorities in China were wholly appropriate for their markets and everyone else should stand down.They are trying to do what they think they need to do to prevent panic in their markets and have the ability, and willingness, to do more if it isn’t enough. But that doesn’t mean every other central bank must proactively adjust policy lest their stock markets gets antsy. I wish more people would talk about whether enough is being done to eradicate the illness and what might help rather than what can be done to keep traders mollified. As an aside, traders should take comfort from measures such as travel restrictions rather than think this incites panic as some have suggested.

On Friday, Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida, while acknowledging that the virus scare is a wild card for the economic outlook, reiterated that the U.S. economy “is in a good place.” And the current interest-rate stance can keep things “humming.” This morning, ECB Vice President Luis de Guidnos said that the euro area economy’s risks are tilted less to the downside and that the bank believes that economic activity should start to accelerate in the second or third quarter of the year. It’s doubtful they just said these things to cheerlead.

And I’m sure we all take comfort that they both made clear that their institutions are monitoring the situation. Who would expect anything less. Don’t they always do that? But expecting, let alone demanding, a monetary policy response at this point is ridiculous. If S&P 500 futures open near where they are trading this morning, the index will be up small year-to-date. Not as good a start as some had hoped, but hardly a disaster.

A look at the monthly charts shows an equity market that has been moving up impulsively. Some sort of correction could hardly come as a surprise, no matter what the news. But as futures bounced overnight, right from the get-go mind you, my inbox read like catastrophe has been, narrowly, averted. And, laughably, that traders had somehow decided that the negative price action in China’s markets wouldn’t have lasting spillover elsewhere. With the subtext being, however, as long as rate cuts remain a possibility.

China is said to be reviewing its economic growth targets and may downgrade its forecast of 2020 growth. They won’t do that today, as it’s usually something officially set in March. It makes logical sense, in any case, that they give themselves a chance to evaluate the fall-out. That’s an approach traders might consider themselves. We can’t all be experts on disease control and containment.

Last Friday, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index had a bit of a washout. Today, it’s bid and has risen right into its resistance zone 1,198 to 1,200. It’s worth watching.

Ten-year Treasury yields got close to the meaningful 1.50% level. It was big in October and will be so now. A lot of people are looking to fade the move down here. It’s a level that is very much in play. Very hard not to nibble. Equally hard to give away your protection.

But perhaps the most important market to watch for guidance will be commodities.

The Bloomberg Commodity Index looks awful.

Whether it bounces or continues on its way may be the best indicator of where we make the next move from here in everything else.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 10:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Sd1ZSS Tyler Durden

China Seeking “Flexibility” On Phase 1 Trade Pledges As Its Economy Grinds To A Halt

China Seeking “Flexibility” On Phase 1 Trade Pledges As Its Economy Grinds To A Halt

Last night, when we reported the plunge in the yuan below 7.00 vs the dollar – traditionally a level that has been seen as triggering the US Treasury into screaming fx manipulation – we noted that it is only a matter of time before the US and China sat down to discuss just how viable the terms of the Phase 1 remain, especially with China’s economy now expected to slow below a 5% GDP if only in the short term, as the country reels from the fallout of the Coronavirus epidemic which has led to tens of millions of Chinese citizens living under mandatory or self-imposed quarantine.

We didn’t have long to wait, because moments ago, Bloomberg reported that Chinese officials “are hoping the U.S. will agree to some flexibility on pledges in their phase-one trade deal” as Beijing tries to contain the fallout from the health crisis that has infected over 17,500 and killed over 360.

The Phase 1 trade deal which was signed on Jan. 15 – just one day before China finally started reporting virus data – and is supposed to take effect in mid-February, has a clause that states the U.S. and China will consult “in the event that a natural disaster or other unforeseeable event” delays either from complying with the agreement. It’s unclear whether China has formally requested such a consultation yet, but according to Bloomberg sources the plan “is to ask for it at some point.”

As the report goes on to note, Chinese officials are evaluating whether the target for economic growth this year should be softened as part of a broader review of how the government’s plans will be affected by the deadly virus outbreak. However, so far it does not appear that the US is rushing to concede to Chinese demands, especially since Larry Kudlow last week said that the U.S. hasn’t seen any major effects on its economy from the epidemic.

“This is principally a public health problem and the pandemic of course is in China, not the U.S.,” Kudlow said Thursday in an interview on Fox Business Network. “Insofar as the economy, we see no material impact.”

Curiously, the Bloomberg report comes about an hour after the WSJ reported that the Trump administration has been granting fewer exemptions to tariffs on Chinese imports, with the approval rate recently plunging to 3% in the third round of levies from 35% in the first two.  More from the source below:

Requests for exemptions have been made by more than 4,500 companies, which typically say they have no viable or cost-effective alternatives to Chinese products. Many companies seek more than one exemption. For just the fourth round alone, more than 8,700 requests for exemptions were made by Friday, the filing deadline.

HealthWay Family of Brands filed for 11 exemptions on electronic and other parts it imports from China to build air cleaners in Pulaski, N.Y. When the U.S. Trade Representative denied all its requests, the company was forced to lay off eight of its 48 workers and sideline plans to expand, said Vinny Lobdell Jr., the company’s global president.

“We were set to build a $2 million expansion,” said Mr. Lobdell. “We had looked at bringing 30 to 40 more jobs to the area as the Intellipure product line was growing.”

With the Trump admin playing hardball with US demands for easier tariffs, it is hard to see just why he would concede, even if China were to wrap its request as a “force majeure.”

Meanwhile, the market’s verdict on the US-China trade deal remains one of pervasive skepticism, with soybean prices – one of the main commodities Beijing agreed to purchase – reflecting rising concern about weaker demand from China. Soybeans traded in Chicago were little changed after nine straight days of declines, the longest losing streak since July 2014.

And in more bad news for Beijing, if it is indeed hoping for mercy from Trump, when asked if the virus will give the U.S. more leverage in the second phase of trade discussions with the Asian nation, Kudlow said the outbreak is “completely separate from trade, jobs and all the rest.”

“This is an issue of helping them if we can, offering our assistance, engaging with them, this is a humanitarian effort on our part — nothing to do with economic rivalries,” he said.

Ironically, so far China has refused every US proposal to help with the coronavirus epidemic: one wonders why – is it to prevent US observers from seeing just how China “handles” the flood of deaths resulting from the disease, which according to numerous sources, is far, far greater than the official number, and that Chinese officials are merely rushing to burn the bodies to avoid having to specify the true cause of death, in order to keep mortality rate calculations low and prevent an even greater panic within Chinese society.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 10:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Se4mol Tyler Durden

Democrats Gather For Iowa Caucus, Here’s What To Expect

Democrats Gather For Iowa Caucus, Here’s What To Expect

The Iowa caucuses begin tonight at 8 p.m. ET, marking the first nominating contest of the 2020 election cycle. Democrats across the states will head to their local precinct caucus locations to vote for their desired candidate to take on Donald Trump in the November election.

Via the New York Times

There are 1,678 neighborhood locations and 87 “satellite caucuses” around the world, where delegates will be chosen for the Iowa state party convention who will be sent on to the Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee July 13-16 to represent their candidates.

How it works

During each caucus meeting, attendees physically group themselves by candidate, in what’s known as the “first alignment.” Any candidate who fails to garner at least 15% of the vote is declared non-viable, and their supporters can either join other groups or try to appeal to others to join them. Then, a second vote known as the “final alignment” is held to determine how delegates are awarded.

On Sunday, Democratic presidential candidates competed with the Super Bowl in a last-minute bid to appeal to Iowans. And while a Saturday night pre-caucus poll which has historically shed light on where the candidates stand was canceled due to a ‘survey error,’ Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is largely seen as the frontrunner going into Mondays contest, after an Emerson College poll on Sunday showed him with 28% support followed by Joe Biden at 21%, Pete Buttigieg at 15%, and Elizabeth Warren at 14%. That said, 34% of those polled said they could change their vote.

Notably, President Trump lost the Iowa caucus in 2016.

Public polling has shown Mr. Sanders gaining ground, and he has outspent all of the other leading Democrats on television by a wide margin in recent weeks. A New York Times polling average found Mr. Sanders and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. tied for first place in the state, with each of them collecting support from about 22 percent of likely caucusgoers. Trailing them in third and fourth place were former Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., and Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. –New York Times

And if Sanders takes Iowa, he will have a good shot at carrying that momentum into New Hampshire’s primary next week – where he is already considered to have the top spot – and then on to Nevada on February 22.

Via Politico (Photo: M. Scott Mahaskey)

That said, as the Times notes, “there is still widespread concern among Democratic Party leaders and center-left primary voters about the implications of nominating a self-described democratic socialist to take on President Trump.”

His chief opponents are unlikely to give way easily: Even if he is defeated here, Mr. Biden has a strong national following among moderate voters and African-Americans, while Ms. Warren retains a sizable base among educated liberals and women. And Michael R. Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, is looming as a competitor in the March primary states. –New York Times

Meanwhile, 2020 candidate Mike Bloomberg – who just got into a fight with President Trump over his height, is skipping Iowa and will instead engage in a massive advertising campaign in later-voting states.

According to the betting lines, Bloomberg is gaining ground as Biden collapses, but it’s Bernie that is becoming the strong favorite to get the Dem nod…

No wonder the DNC is working so hard against him.


Tyler Durden

Mon, 02/03/2020 – 10:16

Tags

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2GMlkVE Tyler Durden

The Trouble with Tennessee’s Lethal Injection Drugs

Tennessee plans to execute three death row inmates this year, despite serious concerns about the state’s lethal injection drugs.

The inmates facing execution are Nicholas Todd Sutton (scheduled to be killed on February 20), Oscar Franklin Smith (scheduled for June 4), and Harold Wayne Nichols (scheduled for August 4). Last week, Smith’s lawyers filed a complaint detailing problems with potassium chloride, one of drugs in the state’s three-drug protocol. The drug induces cardiac arrest, but it is possible for consciousness to continue for as long as three minutes after the heart has already stopped. Meanwhile, the intravenous injection of the drug can cause a “searing, burning” sensation throughout the veins. With the administration of paralytics, execution staff and witnesses are prevented from seeing an inmate’s true reaction to the painful process.

The complaint also includes an email between state prison officials showing that the state has been aware as early as August 2018 that the drug is not mixing properly. Administered intravenously, the compounded potassium chloride will feel like rocks entering the body. It may also fail to reach the heart, meaning that the subject could die in another, even more painful way: slowly suffocated to death by the previously administered paralytic.

Smith’s attorneys also note that the state’s supply of vecuronium bromide, the paralytic in its three-drug solution, expired in November 2019. Emails included in the complaint show that the state is interested in obtaining pentobarbital as a replacement. This may be less painful than Tennessee’s current three-drug protocol, but pentobarbital was linked to a set of botched executions in Oklahoma in 2014.

At least three death row inmates have chosen to die by electric chair since 2018, believing the state’s three-drug protocol to be a worse fate.

“This whole question of how we kill our prisoners is sort of a sideshow when the system is as broken as it is,” Abraham Bonowitz, co-director of Death Penalty Action, tells Reason. “All of that really exposes the flaws of the system.”

This isn’t the first time a state has behaved improperly when faced with a limited supply of execution drugs. Arkansas, for example, rushed to execute four of its death row inmates in 2017 because its drugs were expiring. Among those killed was Ledell Lee, whom the Innocence Project and the American Civil Liberties Union now believe died for a murder that he likely did not commit. And in 2014, Louisiana tricked a hospital into providing a drug needed to carry out an execution. The state suggested that the drug was needed for a “medical patient,” leading the hospital to believe it was treating a sick inmate.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Op7xZb
via IFTTT

Court Ordered Police Officer’s Divorcing Wife to Take Down Posts Alleging Abuse and a Coverup

As I’ve noted in an earlier post, Tennessee law generally provides that courts in divorce cases must “restrain[] both parties from harassing, threatening, assaulting or abusing the other and from making disparaging remarks about the other to or in the presence of any children of the parties or to either party’s employer.” Here’s how it played out in one case, Stark v. Stark.

Pamela Stark had been a prosecutor who was married to Joe Stark, a Memphis Police Department sergeant. She petitioned for divorce, “alleg[ing] that she was injured during a physical altercation with Husband days before the complaint for divorce was filed.” She also sent an e-mail to the Mayor about the matter:

Wife’s four-page email to the mayor likewise claimed that she was a victim of domestic violence at the hands of Husband and a victim of misconduct by the Memphis Police Department [in the handling of the investigation -EV]. She identified her husband by name and rank and described her version of the physical altercation between them and the events that followed. Wife asked the mayor to “look into this before it goes further.”

And she posted a Facebook post:

The husband asked the court to order the post removed, arguing “that such dissemination of these allegations could cause immediate irreparable harm to Husband’s reputation and employment,” in part because “he and Wife have many mutual friends on the social media site because Wife worked as a prosecutor.” The judge agreed:

THE COURT: Counsel [referring to Pamela Stark], here’s the problem. You’re under a mutual restraining order. You are. Notwithstanding that any other—when you filed your Complaint, the restraining order was put into place. And that included not to make any disparaging comments to an employer. The mayor is his employer. Bottom line.

You can sit there and argue that you have a freedom of speech, and but the moment you sat there and said in this letter referencing your husband, that changed it. That was about him. It wasn’t about a general concern about police corruption.

The fact that, you know, another police officer was arrested yesterday or last week or last month, if you want to sit there and rant about that, have at it. But if you’re going to make references to your husband, about your husband, about your situation, then that is off limits. Bottom line.

That post shall be removed today, and a mandatory injunction will go into effect that there will be no communication with employers…. Whatever allegations have been made, we’ll deal with that in due course. But at this point involving making any further allegations in social media is completely inappropriate and is being enjoined.

The wife at first refused to take down the post, but was jailed (for four hours) until she did. Clearly unconstitutional, I think.

Unfortunately, the Tennessee Court of Appeals held (just last Friday) that Pamela Stark’s appeal didn’t use the proper procedural route for challenging the preliminary injunction and therefore declined to reach the First Amendment question. But if you ever find yourself challenging a similar Tennessee injunction in the future—or the statute that indirectly seemed to lead to it—please let me know.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2ScQXgm
via IFTTT

The Trouble with Tennessee’s Lethal Injection Drugs

Tennessee plans to execute three death row inmates this year, despite serious concerns about the state’s lethal injection drugs.

The inmates facing execution are Nicholas Todd Sutton (scheduled to be killed on February 20), Oscar Franklin Smith (scheduled for June 4), and Harold Wayne Nichols (scheduled for August 4). Last week, Smith’s lawyers filed a complaint detailing problems with potassium chloride, one of drugs in the state’s three-drug protocol. The drug induces cardiac arrest, but it is possible for consciousness to continue for as long as three minutes after the heart has already stopped. Meanwhile, the intravenous injection of the drug can cause a “searing, burning” sensation throughout the veins. With the administration of paralytics, execution staff and witnesses are prevented from seeing an inmate’s true reaction to the painful process.

The complaint also includes an email between state prison officials showing that the state has been aware as early as August 2018 that the drug is not mixing properly. Administered intravenously, the compounded potassium chloride will feel like rocks entering the body. It may also fail to reach the heart, meaning that the subject could die in another, even more painful way: slowly suffocated to death by the previously administered paralytic.

Smith’s attorneys also note that the state’s supply of vecuronium bromide, the paralytic in its three-drug solution, expired in November 2019. Emails included in the complaint show that the state is interested in obtaining pentobarbital as a replacement. This may be less painful than Tennessee’s current three-drug protocol, but pentobarbital was linked to a set of botched executions in Oklahoma in 2014.

At least three death row inmates have chosen to die by electric chair since 2018, believing the state’s three-drug protocol to be a worse fate.

“This whole question of how we kill our prisoners is sort of a sideshow when the system is as broken as it is,” Abraham Bonowitz, co-director of Death Penalty Action, tells Reason. “All of that really exposes the flaws of the system.”

This isn’t the first time a state has behaved improperly when faced with a limited supply of execution drugs. Arkansas, for example, rushed to execute four of its death row inmates in 2017 because its drugs were expiring. Among those killed was Ledell Lee, whom the Innocence Project and the American Civil Liberties Union now believe died for a murder that he likely did not commit. And in 2014, Louisiana tricked a hospital into providing a drug needed to carry out an execution. The state suggested that the drug was needed for a “medical patient,” leading the hospital to believe it was treating a sick inmate.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Op7xZb
via IFTTT