Russia Nears Completion Of Second “Holy Grail” Gas Deal With China

Six months ago, something few had expected would take place in 2014, or even in the coming years, happened: under Western pressure and out of a desire to diversify away from an increasingly hostile European market, Russia signed the so-called “Holy Grail” gas deal with China, pivoting away from the west and toward with Beijing.

As part of the deal, the two nations reached a $400 billion agreement to construct the Power of Siberia pipeline, which will deliver 38 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas to China. The compromise was a lower price than Gazprom would have otherwise hoped for, however in taking a cue right out of Amazon, “Russia would make up in volume what it lost in price.” This eastern route will connect Russia’s Kovykta and Chaynda fields with China, where recoverable resources are estimated at about 3 trillion cubic meters.

And then today, with little fanfare, Russia’s president Putin – whose economy is said to be reeling as a result of a plunging currency, paradoxically something Japan would love to be able to achieve on such short notice – told the media ahead of his visit to the Asia Pacific Economic Conference on November 9-11, that Moscow and Beijing have agreed many of the aspects of a second gas pipeline to China, the so-called western route, or as some already are calling it, the “second holy grail.”

We have reached an understanding in principle concerning the opening of the western route,” Putin said. “We have already agreed on many technical and commercial aspects of this project laying a good basis for reaching final arrangements,” the Russian President added.

As RT reports, the opening of the western route, the Altai, would link Western China and Russia and supply an additional 30 bcm of gas, nearly doubling the gas deal reached in May.

Once the Altai route is completed, China will become Russia’s biggest gas customer, able to receive up to 68 bcm of gas annually, surpassing the 40 bcm Russia supplies Germany each year.

 

Furthermore, now that the western embargo against Russia has made any ongoing cooperation between the western majors and Russia, especially in the Arctic region, virtually impossible if only for the time being, Russia has no choice but to entice China to accept the part of the provider of capital investment and technical know how (arguably reverse engineered from the best western firms). Which is why Russia has already offered Chinese companies a stake in large energy fields. In September, Russia’s largest oil company, Rosneft, offered China a share in its second-largest oil field, Vankor in the Krasnoyarsk region in Eastern Siberia. The area is estimated to have reserves of 520 million metric tons of oil and 95 billion cubic meters of natural gas.

“We have built and put into operation an oil pipeline from Russia to China and concluded agreements providing for the increase in crude oil supplies,” Putin said.

 

China will participate in joint exploration and extraction of crude oil and coal in Russia, and work on a jointly funded oil refinery in China has started.

And while Putin will be planning how to further expand the Russia-China energy symbiosis without losing too much of his own leverage, he will be joined by Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who will reportedly meet with his US counterpart John Kerry. Judging by the recent escalation in Ukraine, the two will have much to discuss.

And yet, it is increasingly the case that Russia is happy to leave the west and its petrodollars behind (something Obama is hardly excited about), instead chosing to be paid in Gas-o-yuans or rubles.

“Strengthening ties with China is a foreign policy priority of Russia. Today, our relations have reached the highest level of comprehensive equitable trust-based partnership and strategic interaction in their entire history. We are well aware that such collaboration is extremely important both for Russia and China,” Putin President said.

And as Europe slowly slides into depression having lost a major trade partner, China’s trade with Russia, and obviously vice versa, is surging: overall trade between Russia and China increased by 3.4% in the first half of 2014, reaching $59.1 billion, and the two neighbors expect annual trade to reach $200 billion by 2020. China is Russia’s second-biggest trading partner after the EU.

And just in case the two host central banks opt out of wiring or reciving USD-denominated payments, or are prohibited to do so should SWIFT escalate and expel Russia from the organization, recall that the central banks of the two countries recently signed a three-year ruble-yuan currency swap deal worth up to $25 billion, in order to boost trade using national currencies and lessen dependence on the dollar and euro.

Said otherwise, front page coverage of Russia, and its Chinese pivot, may have slowed down in recent weeks, but the motions behind the scenes are anything but over. And while the developed world is increasingly withdrawing from trade with itself and the BRICs, instead relying increasingly more on outright currency devaluation to boost “wealth”, it is the two superpowers of China and Russia that are approaching the future the right way. The “exorbitant privilege” of having their own reserve currency will arrive in due course.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1otwX7b Tyler Durden

Colorado School Goes into Lockdown Because… Gravity Bong!

BongAdams City
High School in Commerce City, Colorado, went into lockdown Friday
morning because—wait for it—some kid’s gravity bong released a
bunch of marijuana smoke into a classroom.

The bong was hidden in a backpack, and started inadvertently
releasing smoke, according
to
The
Denver Post
:

Adams City High School was put on modified lockdown Friday
morning after a student’s gravity bong — a device that uses the
force of gravity to pull large amounts of cannabis into a chamber —
released smoke in a classroom, officials said.

“As a precautionary measure our students were placed on a
modified lockdown to limit movement throughout the school,” the
school said in a release. “School resource officers and nurses are
on site as a precautionary measure to address the needs of students
if necessary.”

The smoke was released about 9:45 a.m. in the Commerce City
school, said Breanna Deidel, a spokeswoman for the school
district.

“Everybody is safe,” Deidel said. “The kid who did it is in the
office meeting with the disciplinary team right now.”

Marijuana is of course legal in Colorado, although I would still
expect a kid who brought it into school to get in some serious
trouble. Hopefully, not too serious. Maybe the
administrators will be in a mellow mood.

Was a lockdown really necessary, though? Increasingly, schools
jump into panic mode over
relatively

trivial

incidents
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1Ec6Jbg
via IFTTT

Kentucky Deputy Won’t Be Charged In Shooting Death of 19-Year-Old Trying to Leave a Party

Although the portion of the video of the incident that was
publicly released (see
this May Hit and Run entry
) made his story seem improbable—as
it seemed to show him approaching her departing car from the side
with her front well past him—a grand jury in Boone County,
Kentucky, faced with a prosecutor’s death investigation evidence
concluded that Samantha Ramsey did indeed represent a threat to the
life of Deputy Tyler Brockman such that he was justified in
shooting her four times from the hood of her car, into a car with
three other passengers.

Brockman was breaking up a party from which Ramsey and her
friends were trying to leave, and he suspected she might be legally
impaired. According to the investigator’s report, she was, on both
alcohol and marijuana.

The forensic report said tire tracks matching the car are on his
foot, and that she indeed made a sharp left turn into him and
knocked him to the hood of her car, making the shooting
justified.

Accounts of the grand jury decision from
Cincinnati’s WCPO-TV
,
Cinncinnati.com
, and
WKRC Local 12
from Cinncinnatti.

From the WCPO report:

One of Ramsey’s passengers described it differently.

“We saw three cars, so we thought we could go pass,” said Bobby
Turner, who was in the backseat behind Ramsey when she was shot.
“The officer was talking to somebody else. We was listening to
music in the car. We didn’t know the police was talking to us… I
just saw him jump on the hood and start shooting.”

From his perspective across the street, Josh Pitts of Covington
said it appeared Brockman leapt onto Ramsey’s vehicle.

“As she was trying to make a turn and leave the party, he jumped
on the car and pulled his gun out and shot four times through the
window and hit the girl,” Pitts said.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wCTDU7
via IFTTT

Mike Tyson: Master Game Theorist

Submitted by Ben Hunt via Salient Partners' Epsilon Theory blog,


 

Everyone has a plan until they get hit in the mouth.
Mike Tyson

My long-term strategy turned into a 12-hour strategy.
"Survivor" contestant Dale, voted our in last week's tribal council

Reality doesn't interest me.
Leni Riefenstahl, acclaimed German film director and Nazi stooge

Ben, there is no such thing as a good redouble.
Grace Hunt, my grandmother, in a memorable bridge lesson

I’ve been wrestling with what to write about the Bank of Japan’s decision last Friday where … to use a ZeroHedge turn of a poker phrase … they went “all-in-er” on balance sheet expansion and monetary policy QE. It’s hard to find a middle ground here. On the one hand I could write a copycat oh-my-god-can-you-believe-what-these-madmen-are-doing note, but frankly I’m tired of being outraged, and I suspect most Epsilon Theory readers are, too. On the other hand, I really AM outraged by the increasing number of articles and emails I read where BOJ actions and Fed actions and ECB actions are celebrated in Leni Reifenstahl-esque fashion as some modern day Triumph of The Will, as if the symbolic projection of an unlimited, indomitable, and grandiose State were the highest possible achievement for political leaders. Yes, I just played the fascist card. I don’t think I’m wrong.

It was only after reading a quote from Nouriel Roubini – “They had no choice.” – that I had my hook on how to write this note. Because I think Nouriel is right, not in his evaluation of the objective parameters of the decision itself (I think he’s dead wrong on that score), but in how a slim majority of the BOJ perceived the decision at hand. I think the majority believed that they were forced to take this action, and I think that this perspective – when combined with some basic ideas from game theory – can shine some light on what might happen next.

In game theory, to say that “you have no choice” can mean one of three things.

First, it can mean that you have what’s called a “dominant strategy”, where regardless of what actions or decisions are made by other players in the game you are always better off to take a singular course of action. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s sky-hook was a dominant strategy in the game of basketball. No matter what his opponents did, no matter how tall they were, no matter how quick they were … Kareem could always get this shot off. He might miss the shot, but that was totally on him; a miss had nothing to do with his opponents. Dominant strategies are, as the name suggests, typically the purview of dominant players, which certainly doesn’t describe Japan in the Great Game of international politics, so I don’t think that’s a big part of what’s going on here.
 

Second, it can mean that you’ve discounted what’s called “the shadow of the future” to the point that if immediate exigencies point you in a singular direction … well, that’s the only direction you can imagine. I see this a lot in reality shows like “Survivor”, where contestants must “scramble” (to use the lingo) in a desperate effort just to last one more day in the game. As last week’s eliminated contestant Dale said, “my long-term strategy turned into a 12-hour strategy”. That’s what happens when the future is discounted severely, and I think that’s a significant piece of the BOJ decision last Friday. Even if you believe that current Japanese monetary policy creates a mighty thin tightrope over a mighty deep chasm filled with mighty hungry alligators a few years out, that means essentially nothing if you also believe that the immediate future is a political disaster without doing something in a big way. And if you’re a central banker that big something can only be more QE. It’s indicative of the degree to which monetary policy has been politicized – particularly in Japan – as central bankers now suffer from the same extreme myopia that elected politicians have always demonstrated. 

Third, and I think predominantly in this case, it can mean that you’re not even playing a game, but that you are acting in a strategic vacuum where you are only considering your own preferences. We’ve all fallen prey to this fallacy … we plan and scheme and strategize to the nth degree, based on our own calculus of our own pluses and minuses associated with our own actions … and it all goes swimmingly until, as Mike Tyson so brilliantly put it, we get smacked in the mouth. We get popped really hard, and as we’re falling to the canvas we think “Oh yeah, I guess the other guy had a plan, too. Maybe I should have taken that into consideration.” Or as my grandmother put it when I got totally wiped out by her bridge cronies playing for a penny a point because I was solely focused on the strength of my own hand, “Ben, there is no such thing as a good redouble.” Best advice I ever got.

For five and a half years the BOJ has had a clear field to take whatever actions they wished without fear of some other, stronger central bank smacking them in the mouth. There has been a coordination of central bank purpose and effort that hasn’t been seen since … the 1985 Plaza Accords? Bretton Woods? Whatever your reference point might be from an economic history perspective, it’s been a very long time since we’ve seen such a very long period of such a non-strategic, we’re-all-in-this-together decision making backdrop for second tier central banks like the BOJ or the BOE. So it really doesn’t surprise me at all that the BOJ did what it did last Friday. Like you and me and market participants everywhere, the BOJ Governors have been very well trained to expect that the Fed has got their back, that they can act according to their own narrow and immediate self-interests without concern or fear that their actions will result in someone smacking them in the mouth.

Unfortunately for the BOJ, I think that this happy state of coordinated policy bliss ended about six months ago. I think that they have redoubled this particular contract as if they were playing bridge with doting grandparents rather than chain-smoking, penny-pinching old crones. I think that there is a clear and growing divergence between the US and the rest of the world when it comes to balance sheet expansion and monetary policy intentions, and I think that for China in particular this latest BOJ action is perceived as an aggressive provocation that must be responded to forcefully.

So what’s next? I’m waiting for China’s response. I have no idea whether the response will be (to use the political science terminology) symmetric or asymmetric in scale and delivery. That is, the response could be larger or smaller than the perceived provocation, and it may or may not be a response delivered through monetary policy. I have no idea exactly when the response will occur. But I have zero doubt that a forceful response is coming. I have zero doubt that Japan is about to get smacked in the mouth. And when that happens the monetary policy calculus in Japan … and the UK … and even the EU will take on a very different shape. The domestic political dictates may still overwhelm the international economic consequences of extraordinary monetary policy easing. In other words, Japan’s politicians (which surely includes the BOJ Governors) may still have a scrambling Survivor contestant’s view of the shadow of the future, where they’re just looking to live another day regardless of the long-term consequences. But they will no longer be making these decisions within a strategic vacuum. And that’s a very different – and more difficult – game to play.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xqXh1E Tyler Durden

If NYC Cops Arrest Fewer Pot Dealers, Maybe They Will Deliver Fewer Beatings Too

The New
York Post
 reports
that the NYPD has stopped making “buy and bust” arrests of pot
dealers:

The head of each borough’s narcotics unit was summoned to 1
Police Plaza last week and told, “The powers that be don’t want to
see any more of these [pot] arrests,” sources said.

An angry source called it a calculated move by city leaders.

“Of course, this comes from City Hall and [Mayor Bill] de
Blasio. This is all about arresting minorities, and this is just
one way to arrest less minorities,'” the source said.

During his campaign last year, De Blasio
decried
“low‐level marijuana possession arrests,” saying they
disproportionately affect minorities and “have disastrous
consequences for individuals and their families.” He promised to
end the “unjust and wrong” practice of arresting pot smokers
for “public display” of cannabis, an end run around the
decriminalization of marijuana possession that the state
legislature enacted in 1977. But after De Blasio took office,
low-level marijuana busts continued at
about the same pace
as in the last year of Michael Bloomberg’s
administration. The Post‘s angry police source thinks De
Blasio is responding to critics who note that he failed to deliver
on his promise by 
dialing back arrests of
small-time pot dealers. If so, maybe he could get cops to lay off
their customers too.

Ed Mullins, president of the Sergeants Benevolent
Association, thinks such restraint signals the end of civilization
as we know it. Seriously. “If the current practice of making
arrests for both possession and sale of marijuana is, in fact,
abandoned,” he told the Post, “then this is clearly
the beginning of the breakdown of a civilized society.”

Even as it slides into anarchy, New York City may see less
lawlessness of
this sort
:

Two New York City police officers have surrendered to face
criminal charges in the videotaped beating of a teenage marijuana
suspect.

David Afanador and Tyraine Isaac were awaiting arraignment on
Wednesday afternoon. They both reportedly face charges of assault
and official misconduct and one also faces an extra charge of
criminal possession of a weapon.

Security video from Aug. 29 captured a 16-year-old slowing down
on a Brooklyn sidewalk as the officers caught up to
him…. 

The video allegedly shows an NYPD officer later identified as
Isaac hitting the teen with a roundhouse punch. Seconds later, as
the teen tries to surrender, Afanador appears to hit him with his
pistol. The beating continues until the teen drops to the ground
and is handcuffed….

Patrick Lynch, the president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent
Association, said the video doesn’t tell the full story.

What is the context that supposedly explains the officers’
violence? Police “claimed that in the Aug. 29 incident [the
teenager] threw 17 small bags of pot while running away.”

DNAinfo has
video
of the arrest.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/13TgtMD
via IFTTT

Mitch to Rand, ‘I Got Your Back, Bro,’ Navy SEALs Argue Over Who Killed Osama: P.M. Links

  • The HobbitSen. Majority Leader Mitch
    McConnell
    has promised
    to support likely Republican presidential hopeful
    Rand Paul in “whatever he decides to do.”
  • The Navy SEALs team that killed Osama bin Laden
    is arguing
    over who was ultimately responsible for taking out
    the terrorist.
  • President Obama is
    sending
    more troops to advise Iraqi forces on how to stop ISIS.
    But it’s definitely a “non-combat” thing.
  • Think liberals are going to relent in their war of words
    against the Koch brothers? I don’t know why you would think that,
    but if you do,
    you’re wrong
    .
  • According to the coroner’s report, Robin Williams
    was suffering
    from paranoia and depression due to his
    Parkinson’s diagnosis at the time of his suicide.
  • An
    ebola scare
    emptied a nude beach in the Canary Islands.
  • Did you see the trailer for
    The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
    yet?

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on
Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You
can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up
here
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1EbZnVc
via IFTTT

5 Things To Ponder: GOP Takes Control

Submitted by Lance Roberts of STA Wealth Management,

This past Tuesday the conservative Republican candidates garnered a resounding victory over their Democratic challengers in even some of the "bluest" states. The message that was sent by voters was quite clear: "The real economy sucks."

Despite headline statistics, for 80% of American's the real economy remains quite weak with income growth and quality job opportunities scarce. Accordingly, since most voters are generally uniformed about which candidate is running on which platform, the majority vote by the way they "feel" at the time of election. If things are good, they tend to vote for incumbents. If not, they vote for "change."

This weekend's variety of views and opinions on what Tuesday's election blowout means to the economy and the financial markets. Is it a sign of better things ahead or the beginning of the end of the current "bull market?"

But let's start with a bit of humor before we get we get into the serious stuff. (Warning: Strong language)


Jon Stewart election 110414 by lookatmyshirt
 


 

1) Republican's Lay Out Agenda by John Boehner and Mitch McConnell via WSJ Opinion

"Our priorities in the 114th Congress will be your priorities. That means addressing head-on many of the most pressing challenges facing the country, including:"

• The insanely complex tax code that is driving American jobs overseas;
• Health costs that continue to rise under a hopelessly flawed law that Americans have never supported;
• A savage global terrorist threat that seeks to wage war on every American;
• An education system that denies choice to parents and denies a good education to too many children;
• Excessive regulations and frivolous lawsuits that are driving up costs for families and preventing the economy from growing;
• An antiquated government bureaucracy ill-equipped to serve a citizenry facing 21st-century challenges, from disease control to caring for veterans;
• A national debt that has Americans stealing from their children and grandchildren, robbing them of benefits that they will never see and leaving them with burdens that will be nearly impossible to repay.

Let the fights begin.

 

2) Whose Economy Will It Be In 2016? by Zachary Karabell via Politico Magazine

"The ugly midterm campaign season provided one area of common ground: Americans and their candidates were almost universal in their disdain for the country’s economic performance over the past six years. In exit polls on Election Day, 78 percent of voters said they were worried about the economy, and clearly the Democrats took most of the blame.

 

Most likely heading into 2016 we face an overall economic picture that is just good enough to counter the collapse and crisis message, but not nearly good enough to lead to an era of good feelings. Maybe, and just maybe, that will offer an opening to someone willing finally to talk not just of two Americas, but of many Americas, some struggling mightily, some succeeding admirably, and multitudes in between. That would be a powerful message, because it would be real and true. Of that we have had precious little of late, but it may prove a winning formula for 2016."

 

3) Will We Get A Republican Bull Market Now? by Stephen Moore via Investors.com

"It was exactly 20 years ago, in November 1994, that Republicans under the maverick leadership of Newt Gingrich and his Contract with America took over the House of Representatives for the first time in nearly half a century.

 

What may not be remembered is that the GOP sweep continued what became the longest and strongest stock market expansion in American history. Investors fell in love with the idea of a centrist Democrat, Bill Clinton, in the White House and a conservative Congress."

Republican-bull-Market

 

4) Will A New Congress Take The Economy Seriously by Wayne Brough via Real Clear Markets

"Yet Obama and the Democrats have done little to address the underlying long term economic problems facing the nation. Indeed, the administration and Democrat controlled Senate have focused almost exclusively on the short run, with cash injections through various stimulus programs. While this should not be surprising, given the short political time horizons that dominate decision making in Washington, D.C., it is nonetheless disconcerting when looking at long run economic trends.

 

So as the new Congress convenes, the economy should rank high among priorities, especially the question of long term public debt. For too long, Washington has pushed the issue on to the next Congress, leaving entitlement spending on autopilot. But the problem is only going to get worse as more of the population shifts from the labor force to retirement."

 

5) Will The New Congress Bring Economic Renewal by Mohamed A. El-Erian via Bloomberg

"With Republicans in control of both houses, the markets hope the stage is set for a constructive cohabitation of a Republican Congress and a Democratic president, similar to what evolved under President Bill Clinton. The late 1990s are remembered for a number of important pro-growth legislative initiatives.

 

There is certainly some low-hanging fruit that is ripe for bipartisan agreement, and that could be acted on quickly (such as free-trade agreements, immigration reform and the overhaul of corporate taxation). But two big things are required for this to translate into a phenomenon that would decisively improve the prospects for growth, jobs and prosperity.

 

First, the two parties would need to be a lot less beholden to their political bases.

 

Second, the two parties have to be convinced (and trust, initially and over time) that their interests would remain aligned, even while pursuing objectives that are anathema to the other."

My opinion: Those two objectives are unlikely to be met as Republican's candidates are working under a "mandate" from their base. They won elections based on strict promises to repeal/reform the ACA, lower taxes and reform immigration but not give amnesty. This is likely to end in a "sea of red-ink vetos" from the White House and ongoing bitter fighting in the months ahead.

Bonus Watch: What Do Voters Want From Congress In January via Gallup


“The enemy isn’t conservatism. The enemy isn’t liberalism. The enemy is bulls**t." —Lars-Erik Nelson, political columnist

Have a great weekend.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yfmEUf Tyler Durden

David Harsanyi: GOP Wave Debunks Myths About Gridlock, Obamacare

In
victory and in concession speeches, candidates of both parties
still claim that “dysfunction” has been the biggest problem in
Washington. But where exactly have Republicans suffered for their
stubbornness? The reality is that Republicans have been generously
rewarded for their tenacity in stopping post-Obamacare progressive
policy, writes David Harsanyi.

Since 2010, the Republicans have pulled together a historic
string of victories—with scores of seats changing hands in the
House. If anything, what we learned is that politicians are far
likelier to be penalized by the electorate for passing unworkable
and overreaching legislation than they are for stopping it.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vW2ZWZ
via IFTTT

Best Day For Gold Since September 2013

Following a heavy volume flush and reversal around midnight ET, gold prices surged today. The 3.3% rally is the best day since September 2013.

Best day in 14 months…

 

With a big flush reversal overnight…

 

With GOFO at its most negative since 2001… indicating 'scarcity' of physical gold among institutions

 

And ETF holdings slammed back to levels first seen in March 2009…

 

Charts: Bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/13SZlqn Tyler Durden