Rabo: Once Again The Global Architecture Is At Risk Of Collapse… Which Is Why Markets Will Keep Rising

Rabo: Once Again The Global Architecture Is At Risk Of Collapse… Which Is Why Markets Will Keep Rising

Tyler Durden

Mon, 08/10/2020 – 09:45

By Michael Every of Rabobank

Action, sanctions, action,…sanctions

The US Congressional stand-off between Democrats and Republicans over a new stimulus bill was temporarily resolved in controversial fashion by President Trump on Saturday via a series of executive orders which: extend unemployment benefits for two months at a level of USD300 per week, down from USD600, with an additional USD100 top up possible from states by tapping FEMA funding; extend the moratorium on rental evictions, although critics say the wording is too vague to help; extend zero rates and deferments on student loans; and defer payments of payroll taxes backdated to 1 July, with the explicit promise from Trump that if he is re-elected he will make this permanent.

Obviously this is less stimulus than was previously available, which was probably already not enough to stop the economy from slowing –regardless of the good US employment news on Thursday and Friday– and kicks the can at best. However, it is mathematically better than nothing. Markets get to see action – and, crucially, so do voters…and it’s the president taking it. (Yes, this is an election year, and all actions need to be viewed through that lens.) Of course, it is also highly controversial and, Democrats claim, of dubious constitutionality which may be challenged in court. Objectively, however, the measures don’t seem to be any more of a stretch than ones previously taken by the Democrats when in office. It does seem that the door is opening for the White House to dip into the huge Treasury balance it has on hand to keep kicking that can until 3 November.

Meanwhile, if Trump vs. Biden is the lens for most market actions, the other is still the US vs. China. Friday saw the US impose sanctions on Hong Kong CEO Carrie Lam as well as senior members of the Hong Kong government. Markets didn’t like this, presuming as usual that no such boats would be rocked. Indeed, the Hong Kong Autonomy Act (HKAA) allowed Trump far longer to make this decision, and there had been whispers, always wrong in my view, that only small-fry would be targeted rather than the head of government. For the bulls, the new “She’ll be right” mantra is that no *banks* were named and, as China has officially stated, this US action is both an egregious insult and ultimately meaningless.

Yet as the Financial Times’ Simon Rabinovitch tweeted over the weekend, quoting an unnamed executive from the Chinese unit of a major European bank:

“…the impact will begin to be felt on Monday morning. He variously described all officials on the list as “toxic” and as “pariahs” for all foreign banks, not just US banks, who deal with them…his view is that major Chinese banks, afraid of trouble with the US, would themselves comply with the sanctions.”

Indeed, as has been underlined before, the HKAA starts with individuals and then automatically moves to banks, and to the USD. So she won’t be right on this glide path.

Then today anti-Beijing Hong Kong press billionaire Jimmy Lai and his sons were arrested for “collusion with a foreign country, uttering seditious words, and conspiracy to defraud,” according to press reports of the words of an arresting officer. The HQ of Lai’s media empire, the newspaper HK Apple Daily, was also raided by dozens of police, all journalists made to show their IDs, and crates of evidence taken away.

Obviously, this does not help sell Hong Kong as an international media center any more than US sanctions on its government help to sell it as an international banking centre.

Moreover, what are the odds the US escalates sanctions in response to China’s reply to Friday’s action? Be assured if there is one thing feuding Democrats and Republicans have in common it will be anger at what China has just done.

So risk on for Trump’s actions, or risk off for China’s? What is actually happening seems to bear very little relation to what markets do nowadays.

One thing we can say, however, is that with July Chinese CPI at 2.7% y/y, only higher than consensus due to food inflation at 13.2% y/y, with core CPI at the lowest since 2010, and key PPI at -2.4% y/y, deflation is still the name of the game, not inflation; and despite the enormous USD62bn Chinese trade surplus for July, and the lack of outbound tourism, and the assumed gain in valuation in non-USD FX reserves from a weaker USD, China’s FX reserves did not move much in the month from their obligatory “none shall pass!” USD3.1x trillion level. Which means more money flowed out than in even when the USD was being talked about as a busted flush.

Meanwhile, New Zealand, which just celebrated 100 days with no local virus transmission, just saw ANZ business confidence FALL from -31.8 to -42.4 and the business outlook from -8.9 to -17. You can beat Covid-19, but if you are doing it all alone then you are still facing a very hard slog. Wait until nobody turns up for the key summer tourist season and imagine how things will look. Let’s see what the RBNZ has to say when they meet later this week.

And in the northern hemisphere, if it’s Monday it must be another bout of selling in TRY, which was below 7.30 at time of writing. As noted last week, this is a situation which is not going to resolve itself: outside involvement is likely to be needed in terms of foreign exchange. Ironically, today marks the 100th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Sevres, which dismantled the Ottoman Empire post-WW1, and which is likely to get far more attention in Turkey than it does in the West –where nobody seems to study history anymore– even as France jostles with Turkey over both Cyprus and Libya. Of course, it is also the date that saw the start of the French mandate in Syria and Lebanon, which coincides with French President Macron’s recent visit to ruined Beirut, a promise that France won’t walk away from it (which will be very expensive, if so), and a Lebanese petition signed by 61,000 people so far demanding the country once again “be placed under a French mandate for the next 10 years.”

Even if that is highly unrealistic, it underlines that once again the global architecture is at risk of collapse as we see realpolitik trump the ‘liberal world order’, huge explosions, warnings of war, political polarization, dubious constitutionality, warnings of election fraud, sanctions, tariffs, and now the arrest of press barons.

You know, the perfect environment for markets to keep rising.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2DtNIOl Tyler Durden

Key Events In The Coming Quiet Week: CPI, Retail Sales, End Of Earnings Season

Key Events In The Coming Quiet Week: CPI, Retail Sales, End Of Earnings Season

Tyler Durden

Mon, 08/10/2020 – 09:35

With much of Wall Street on vacation, there is a fairly sparse calendar this week so as Deutsche Bank’s Craig Nicol writes, it is likely that markets will be taking their temperature from the state of play in Washington. So far we’ve shrugged off the disappointment around the lack of agreement on the next US fiscal package, however with each passing day the greater the risk is to consumer confidence and spending as our US economists highlighted over the weekend, especially given that the over 31 million people receiving unemployment insurance as of the week of July 18 are set to see their monthly income decline by 60%-plus in August.

Aside from fiscal developments, the only notable data releases this week in the US are July CPI on Wednesday and July retail sales on Friday. The latest weekly jobless claims print on Thursday is also worth keeping an eye on.

In Europe we’ve got Germany’s August ZEW survey on Tuesday and a second look at Q2 GDP for the Euro Area on Friday. In China the highlight is on Friday with the July activity indicators data.

Finally, earnings season starts to wind down with the best part of 90% of the S&P 500 having already reported, with the most prominent reporters this week laid out below.

What’s notable is that the early trends of outsized and broad earnings beats has only continued, with forward estimates also ticking higher.

Courtesy of Deutsche Bank, here is a day-by-day calendar of events

Monday

  • Data: China July CPI and PPI; Bank of France July industrial sentiment; Euro Area Aug Sentix investor confidence; US June JOLTS job openings
  • Earnings: Duke Energy, Marriott, Barrick Gold, Saudi Aramco
  • Politics: Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden is expected to announce his choice for Vice President this week

Tuesday

  • Data: Japan June trade balance; UK July jobless claims change and rate, June average weekly earnings, ILO unemployment rate; Aug ZEW survey expectations for Euro area and Germany; Germany Aug ZEW survey current situation; US July NFIB small business optimism, July PPI, July PPI ex Food and Energy
  • Central Banks: Fed’s Daly Speaks; Brazil central bank minutes
  • Earnings: Prudential, Vestas Wind System, Sysco

Wednesday

  • Data: UK June Monthly GDP and preliminary 2Q GDP, June industrial, manufacturing, and construction production and June trade balance; Japan July machine tool orders; Italy July final CPI; Euro June area industrial production; US weekly MBA mortgage applications, July CPI, July real average weekly earnings, July monthly budget statement
  • Central Banks: Fed’s Rosengren, Kaplan and Daly speak
  • Earnings: Orsted, Novozymes, Genmab, Cisco
  • Other: OPEC releases its monthly oil market report

Thursday

  • Data: Japan July PPI; France 2Q ILO Unemployment; Germany and Spain final July CPI; US July import price index, export price index, weekly initial jobless claims and continuing claims
  • Central Banks: Mexican central bank rate decision
  • Earnings: Zurich Insurance, Carlsberg, Deutsche Telekom, Applied Materials

Friday

  • Data: China July industrial production, July retail sales, surveyed jobless rate; France final July CPI; Euro area June trade balance, preliminary 2Q employment and preliminary 2Q GDP; US July retail sales advance, preliminary 2Q nonfarm productivity and unit labour costs, July retail sales, July industrial and manufacturing production, preliminary August U. of Michigan sentiment survey.

* * *

Focusing on the US, Goldman notes, that the key economic data releases this week are the CPI report on Wednesday and the retail sales report on Friday. There are several scheduled speaking engagements from Fed officials this week.

Monday, August 10

  • 10:00 AM JOLTS Job Openings, June (consensus 5,300k, last 5,397k)
  • 04:00 PM Chicago Fed President Evans (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Chicago Fed President Charles Evans will participate in a webinar on workforce issues during Chicago’s recovery from the pandemic.

Tuesday, August 11

  • 06:00 AM NFIB small business optimism, July (consensus 100.4, last 100.6)
  • 08:30 AM PPI final demand, July (GS +0.4%, consensus +0.3%, last -0.2%); PPI ex-food and energy, July (GS +0.2%, consensus +0.1%, last -0.3%); PPI ex-food, energy, and trade, July (GS +0.2%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.3%); We estimate that headline PPI increased by 0.4% in July, largely reflecting stronger energy prices. We expect a 0.2% increase in the core measure excluding food and energy, and also a 0.2% increase in the core measure excluding food, energy, and trade.
  • 11:00 AM Richmond Fed President Barkin (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin will participate in a webinar hosted by the Center for Regional Economic Competitiveness.
  • 12:00 PM San Francisco Fed President Daly (FOMC non-voter) speaks: San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly will participate in a virtual discussion hosted by the Professional BusinessWomen of California.

Wednesday, August 12

  • 08:30 AM CPI (mom), July (GS +0.50%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.6%); Core CPI (mom), July (GS +0.23%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.2%); CPI (yoy), July (GS +0.88%, consensus +0.7%, last +0.6%); Core CPI (yoy), July (GS +1.17%, consensus +1.1%, last +1.2%): We estimate a 0.23% rebound in July core CPI (mom sa), which would leave the year-on-year rate unchanged at +1.2% on a rounded basis. Our monthly core inflation forecast reflects further rebounds in apparel, hotel lodging, and airline prices, as well as continued firmness in car insurance inflation following steep declines in the spring. On the negative side, we expect a decline in education prices reflecting tuition cuts of as much as 5-15% for the fall semester at some universities. We also look for another month of lackluster shelter inflation (+0.1% mom sa for both rent and OER) reflecting continued rent freezes and a drag from rent forgiveness in some areas. We estimate a 0.50% increase in headline CPI (mom sa), reflecting higher energy prices.
  • 10:00 AM Boston Fed President Rosengren (FOMC non-voter) speaks; Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren will participate in a virtual discussion about the U.S. economy and current financial conditions hosted by the South Shore Chamber of Commerce. Audience Q&A is expected.
  • 11:00 AM Dallas Fed President Kaplan (FOMC voter) speaks: Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan will participate in a moderated Q&A hosted by the Lubbock Chamber of Commerce.
  • 03:00 PM San Francisco Fed President Daly (FOMC non-voter) speaks: San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly will participate in a virtual discussion hosted by the Economic Club of New York. Audience and media Q&A are expected.

Thursday, August 13

  • 08:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended August 8 (GS 1,050k, consensus 1,100k, last 1,186k); Continuing jobless claims, week ended August 1 (consensus 15,800k, last 16,107k): We estimate initial jobless claims declined, but remain elevated, at 1,050k in the week ended August 8.
  • 08:30 AM Import price index, July (consensus +0.6%, last +1.4%)
  • 11:00 AM Atlanta Fed President Bostic (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic will discuss equitable solutions for the future of cities in a webinar.

 
Friday, August 14

  • 08:30 AM Retail sales, July (GS +1.1%, consensus +1.9%, last +7.5%); Retail sales ex-auto, July (GS +0.8%, consensus +1.3%, last +7.3%); Retail sales ex-auto & gas, July (GS +0.5%, consensus +1.0%, last +6.7%): Core retail sales, July (GS +0.1%, consensus +0.8%, last +5.6%): We estimate that core retail sales (ex-autos, gasoline, and building materials) edged up by 0.1% in July (mom sa), reflecting a pause in reopening across the country, a strong seasonal factor arising from Amazon Prime Day (which is delayed until the fall this year), and as indicated by continued gains in credit card spending and other high-frequency data. We expect relatively stronger monthly gains for restaurants, gas stations, and autos, and we estimate a 1.1% increase in the headline measure and a 0.8% increase in the ex-auto measure.
  • 08:30 AM Nonfarm productivity, Q2 preliminary (GS +1.4%, consensus +1.5%, last -0.9%); Unit labor costs, Q2 preliminary (GS +9.0%, consensus +6.2%, last +5.1%): We estimate non-farm productivity growth grew by 1.4% in Q2 qoq saar (+0.3% yoy). This reflects relatively larger declines in hours worked than in business output in Q2. We expect Q2 unit labor costs—compensation per hour divided by output per hour—to increase to +9.0% qoq ar (+4.1% yoy).
  • 09:15 AM Industrial production, July (GS +3.1%, consensus +3.0%, last +5.4%); Manufacturing production, July (GS +3.3%, consensus +3.0%, last +7.2%); Capacity utilization, July (GS 70.6%, consensus 70.3%, last 68.6%): We estimate industrial production rose by 3.1% in July, reflecting a continued rebound in manufacturing output. We estimate capacity utilization rose by 2.0pp to 70.6%.
  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, August preliminary (GS 72.5, consensus 71.9, last 72.5): We expect the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index to remain flat at 72.5, reflecting positive stock market gains and a high but declining number of daily new coronavirus cases.
  • 10:00 AM Business inventories, June (consensus -1.1%, last -2.3%)

Source: Deutsche Bank, Goldman, BofA

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3ao8xa1 Tyler Durden

McDonald’s Accuses Former CEO Of Lying And Fraud In Lawsuit Seeking To Clawback Comp

McDonald’s Accuses Former CEO Of Lying And Fraud In Lawsuit Seeking To Clawback Comp

Tyler Durden

Mon, 08/10/2020 – 09:24

As major corporations burn billions of dollars on “virtue-signaling” to avoid being targeted by the ‘cancel culture’ mobs, McDonald’s is apparently trying to offset some of these costs by going after compensation it already paid out to former CEO Steve Easterbrook, who was abruptly fired over an “inappropriate” relationship with a subordinate.

Back in November of last year, McDonald’s fired Easterbrook then released a statement claiming the CEO “violated company policy and demonstrated poor judgment involving a recent consensual relationship with an employee.” He had allegedly been caught “sexting” with the other employee. We speculated at the time that McDonald’s press release, which verged on shaming Easterbrook over what was admittedly a consensual relationship, had been crafted by Easterbrook’s boardroom enemies to make an example of the CEO, whose initiatives to change up the menu by adding all-day breakfast boosted sales, but clearly ruffled some feathers. Easterbrook was also removed from the board.

But according to a new securities filing and a lawsuit filed with the Delaware court of chancery, new whistleblowers from inside the company have apparently come forward over the past few months to accuse Easterbrook of having consensual relationships with 3 McDonald’s employees in the year before his ouster.

These whistleblowers also alleged that the CEO, who walked away with more than $40 million, awarded a huge grant of shares to one of these employees during their relationship.

The lawsuit filed by McDonald’s accuses Easterbrook of fraud by concealing evidence of these affairs from the board and the company on his way out the door. They argue that this information would have impacted negotiations over his exit.

McDonald’s filed a lawsuit against Mr. Easterbrook, accusing him of lying, concealing evidence and fraud.

The lawsuit, filed in state court in Delaware, alleges that Mr. Easterbrook carried on sexual relationships with three McDonald’s employees in the year before his ouster and that he awarded a lucrative batch of shares to one of those employees. McDonald’s said it was seeking to recoup stock options and other compensation that the company last fall allowed Mr. Easterbrook to keep — a package worth more than $40 million, according to Equilar, a compensation consulting firm.

The lurid allegations are reportedly backed up by “photographic evidence”. Easterbrook was fired without cause, but the suit seeks to claw back some of the money paid out to him by changing the nature of his firing to “with cause”.

Easterbrook’s successor, current MCD CEO Chris Kempczinski, has called for a new corporate emphasis on integrity, inclusion and supporting local communities as part of McDonald’s “core mission”.

“McDonald’s does not tolerate behavior from any employee that does not reflect our values,” Kempczinski wrote in an internal memo reportedly shared with the NYT. “As we recommit to our values, now, more than ever, is the time to lean in to what we stand for and act as a positive force for change.”

With the lawsuit, McDonald’s joins a handful of companies that have aggressively sought to deny compensation to CEOs over #MeToo-related indiscretions. Perhaps the most similar case is that of former CBS Chairman and CEO Les Moonves, who was denied his $120 million retirement package over allegations he interfered in an internal company probe. That dispute is now in arbitration, according to the most recent media reports.

During the internal probe, Easterbrook assured investigators that he had never engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee, and alleged that the “sexts” with the still-unnamed fellow employee constituted harmless flirting. However, the notion that “photographic evidence” has been brought to bear against Easterbrook would suggest that he has been caught in a different affair.

However, as the NYT reports, a clause in Easterbrook’s contract says that if it can be proved that he should have been fired “for cause”, that the company would have the right to recoup Easterbrook’s lucrative stock options awarded as part of his retirement package, which the company admitted he was eligible to receive.

But sources inside the company said their internal probe was “insufficient”, and that new information, including information taken from Easterbrook’s former corporate email account, proves he carried on a physical affair with at least two other employees, and even awarded one of them a block of hundreds of thousands of shares during the affair.

From the NYT:

But McDonald’s severance plan, which the company said applied to Mr. Easterbrook, contained an important clause: If, in the future, McDonald’s determined that an employee was dishonest and actually deserved to be fired for cause, the company had the right to recoup the severance payouts.

Last month, after McDonald’s received the anonymous tip alleging that Mr. Easterbrook had had a sexual relationship with another employee, the company opened a new investigation.

In its review last fall, McDonald’s did not thoroughly search through Mr. Easterbrook’s email account; the company’s outside lawyers had only looked at messages that were on his company-issued mobile phone. And Mr. Easterbrook, according to McDonald’s lawsuit, had deleted certain emails from his phone.

This time, McDonald’s said, its investigators conducted a more detailed search, and in Mr. Easterbrook’s email account they found evidence of him carrying on sexual relationships with three employees in the year before his firing.

“That evidence consisted of dozens of nude, partially nude, or sexually explicit photographs and videos of various women, including photographs of these company employees, that Easterbrook had sent as attachments to messages from his company email account to his personal email account,” McDonald’s said in the lawsuit. The company said the emails were sent in late 2018 and early 2019.

This doesn’t look good. And whether the company succeeds in clawing back Easterbrook’s money could have important ramifications for how companies deal with C-Suite “misconduct.”

To sum up: For a company that invented the slogan “you deserve a break today,” it clearly doesn’t feel inclined to cut any slack to the CEO who revitalized its lagging stock with fresh ideas and all-day breakfast.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2XM29UE Tyler Durden

Tropical Disturbance Spotted In Atlantic, Could Form Into Storm This Week 

Tropical Disturbance Spotted In Atlantic, Could Form Into Storm This Week 

Tyler Durden

Mon, 08/10/2020 – 09:05

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) in Miami, Florida, is tracking a tropical wave over the Atlantic that could form into a tropical cyclone this week. 

“NHC is monitoring a tropical wave over the open Atlantic for possible development over the next few days. No impacts to South Florida are expected at this time. This is a reminder that we are in hurricane season. Make sure your hurricane plan is in order,” NHC said. 

The disturbance, dubbed Invest 95L, is located a couple of hundred miles south-southwest of the Cabo Verde Islands. With a 40%-60% chance of forming into a tropical depression over the next few days. The directional heading of the wave is westward across the tropical Atlantic Ocean.

Spaghetti models are showing Invest 95L could track west-northwestward into the Caribbean. 

So far, 2020 has been an extremely active hurricane season, which goes through November 30. Last week, the East Coast of the US was walloped by Hurricane Isaias.

Josephine will be the next named storm in the Atlantic.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3fNpviS Tyler Durden

Chaos In Chicago: Bridges Raised To Prevent Gun-Toting Looters Getting Downtown

Chaos In Chicago: Bridges Raised To Prevent Gun-Toting Looters Getting Downtown

Tyler Durden

Mon, 08/10/2020 – 08:43

Hundreds of ‘mostly peaceful protesters’ swept through the Magnificent Mile and other parts of downtown Chicago early Monday, smashing windows, looting stores, confronting police and at one point exchanging gunfire with officers, authorities said.

As The Chicago Tribune reports, officers had stopped several people on Lake Street near Michigan Avenue when shots were fired from a passing car around 4:30 a.m., nearly five hours into the widespread vandalism, according to police spokesman Tom Ahern.

No officers were shot but a squad car was hit, he said. It was not known if anyone in the gunman’s car was shot.

Police made “a lot of arrests” and recovered at least one gun, officials said.

And that escalation, as Summit News’ Paul Joseph Watson details, prompted Chicago authorities took the decision to raise all major bridges in an effort to prevent looters reaching the downtown area after a night of chaos.

Luxury department stores were ransacked as hundreds of looters caused mayhem in response to the police shooting of an armed suspect in Englewood.

Police sent to respond to the looting were physically attacked, prompting authorities to raise major bridges in order to keep more people out of the area.

“All bridges are being raised along the river throughout The Loop,” reports CBS Chicago. “Chicago’s Office of Emergency Management announced street closures throughout areas in the Magnificent Mile, Gold Coast and South Loop.”

Numerous bus and train services have also been suspended, while large areas of downtown Chicago are also closed.

Bridges were previously raised last month in an effort to keep Black Lives Matter protesters away from the business district, but the call to do so this time around appears to have come too late.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3kvQSle Tyler Durden

Can Cryptocurrency Save Digital Media?

digital media

With the coronavirus decimating ad revenue, digital media companies are in desperate need of new ways to make money. Blockchain technology offers one—and some companies are already using it.

The pandemic has caused a spike in news readership, which should be a good thing for the news industry. But it hasn’t. Many advertisers cut spending in the struggling COVID economy; others refused to allow their ads next to stories about the coronavirus. Revenue plummeted. A slew of pay cuts, furloughs, and layoffs followed in newsrooms across the country.

Social media companies were hit hard too. Facebook is expected to lose $15.7 billion in ad revenue this year due to the pandemic—a 19 percent decline. Twitter and Snap Inc. are expected to lose 18 and 30 percent, respectively.

With print circulation also declining, many magazines and newspapers have shifted to digital subscriptions over the past several years, usually allowing readers a small number of free articles each month before they hit a paywall. Some reports suggest that social media platforms are thinking of following suit. In July, Twitter chief Jack Dorsey said that Twitter is exploring a subscription model for some of its features. 

The subscription revenue model has problems as well. Many readers are not willing to pay for subscriptions at all, let alone shell out $50 to $420 a year for every publication they’re interested in reading. That means subscription-funded publications only make money from devoted readers.

But blockchain technology makes digital transactions involving just a few cents economically feasible. In that way, digital media companies could erect a paywall that you needn’t buy a subscription to get past. By giving readers the option of paying for a single article at a price that makes sense, publications could recover revenue from casual readers unable or unwilling to subscribe.

Traditional electronic payment systems can’t support transactions this small because they rely on third-party intermediaries, such as banks and credit card companies, that have costs. As a result, credit card companies and digital payment platforms such as Venmo, Stripe, and Paypal typically charge merchants 30 cents plus 2.9 percent per transaction, which are then built into the cost of the goods and services they sell. Even Patreon, which now charges merchants a lower rate for pledges under $3, still takes 10 cents plus 5 percent of the pledge. Any potential profits from transactions at such low rates are thus wiped out by the fees involved in making them. 

Cryptocurrencies remove the need for these costly intermediaries, thereby making instant tiny digital payments possible.

For the cryptocurrency that most people are familiar with, bitcoin, microtransactions haven’t panned out, mainly because the cryptocurrency’s protocol limits the rate at which the network can process transactions. Miners cannot add blocks larger than 1 megabyte to the blockchain, and the protocol adds one new block to the blockchain every 10 minutes, so the system can’t process more than seven transactions per second. For perspective, Visa averages about 2,000 transactions per second and has reached as many as 56,000 per second.

For years, bitcoin’s block size wasn’t an issue, as the network was not large enough to bump up against the size cap. But as the system has become more congested, transactions are taking a long time to process and transaction fees are high. At the moment, it costs about $4 to send bitcoin.

Developers are working to solve this through “second layer” protocols such as the “lightning network,” where transactions can be passed back and forth quickly and cheaply before being added to the underlying blockchain. In the meantime, bitcoin isn’t the only cryptocurrency.

As bitcoin approached the block limit, developers disagreed about whether or not to increase it. So the cryptocurrency split—or “forked”—in 2017, leaving two distinct cryptocurrencies: bitcoin, which maintained the previous block size, and bitcoin cash, which increased its block limit to 32 megabytes. In 2019, bitcoin cash forked again, and yet another currency—bitcoin SV—emerged, having removed the technical cap on the block size entirely.

Today, both bitcoin cash and bitcoin SV enjoy extremely low transaction fees. For the former, the average transaction fee is less than a penny. Bitcoin SV’s is less than a tenth of a penny.

People are building businesses around this technology. For example, Twetch is a social media site similar to Twitter, except that every time you follow someone or favorite a post, you are effectively sending them a few pennies in bitcoin SV. Josh Petty, the app’s co-founder, likens Twetch to the old SMS pay-per-text system. Users pay for every action they take on the app: It costs 2 cents to make a post, 5 cents to like a post, and 10 cents to follow another account. Every time one of these transactions occurs, Twetch takes a penny. 

This revenue model means that Twetch doesn’t have to sell ads or user data. Because the blockchain allows even the smallest transactions to be split and sent to multiple addresses, Twetch can take its share of a transaction without ever holding users’ money. It also allows users to profit from their own content. And it’s taking off—Twetch has surpassed 16,000 users, including Danny Trejo.

Other apps have adopted similar systems. Streamanity, a video streaming platform, uses a “pay to play” framework to let creators monetize their content without relying on ads. Creators can charge as little as a penny per view, and viewers can earn bitcoin SV by sharing videos. Bit.sv, which has yet to officially launch, is a blogging platform like Medium that allows content creators to charge for individual posts. 

According to Ryan Charles, the founder of Money Button—the interface that allows Twetch users to make 2 cent transactions at the push of a button—the technology and the product are all in place for digital media companies to implement a pay-per-article paywall today. But there is still a major non-technical problem to solve before doing so would make sense: Most people don’t have bitcoin SV. Most of the hundreds of apps currently using Money Button, including the social media network Powping and the messaging app Baemail, are used and run by bitcoin SV enthusiasts.

There are a variety of ways publications could encourage users to purchase the necessary cryptocurrency. One technique that Twetch uses is to “gift” new users bitcoin SV in order to help them get started. “We give every user three cents to start, and it costs two cents to post,” explains Petty.

Another option would be for digital media companies to sell “credits.” Publications could offer $10 credits that readers could purchase with a credit card and then spend down on one-off articles. But this approach would fail to capture readers who are unwilling to commit $10 to a publication or are interested only in reading a single article.

Truly unlocking the economic potential of microtransactions would require widespread cryptocurrency adoption. Charles envisions a world in which someone browsing the internet could sign into The New York Times—or any other publication—through their preferred cryptocurrency wallet the same way they can sign in with a Gmail account now.

Some question whether a blockchain can scale to handle a global volume of microtransactions without destabilizing the network. Handling a huge volume of transactions in every block would make mining expensive, which could lead to an “extreme centralization” of the network that would threaten its security. For that reason, many think second-layer solutions like the lightning network are a better approach. Others point out that bitcoin SV can already manage a high volume of transactions. Earlier this year, Bitcoin Association reported that the currency’s scaling test network sustained “1,300 transactions per second for a prolonged period, in addition to handling a peak load of 6,400 transactions per second,” approaching Visa’s typical rate.

It’s not clear if either system will ever be popular enough to work in the mainstream media. But with subscription rates remaining low and ad revenue erratic, it may be time to give cryptocurrencies some serious consideration.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3aaUaW8
via IFTTT

Can Cryptocurrency Save Digital Media?

digital media

With the coronavirus decimating ad revenue, digital media companies are in desperate need of new ways to make money. Blockchain technology offers one—and some companies are already using it.

The pandemic has caused a spike in news readership, which should be a good thing for the news industry. But it hasn’t. Many advertisers cut spending in the struggling COVID economy; others refused to allow their ads next to stories about the coronavirus. Revenue plummeted. A slew of pay cuts, furloughs, and layoffs followed in newsrooms across the country.

Social media companies were hit hard too. Facebook is expected to lose $15.7 billion in ad revenue this year due to the pandemic—a 19 percent decline. Twitter and Snap Inc. are expected to lose 18 and 30 percent, respectively.

With print circulation also declining, many magazines and newspapers have shifted to digital subscriptions over the past several years, usually allowing readers a small number of free articles each month before they hit a paywall. Some reports suggest that social media platforms are thinking of following suit. In July, Twitter chief Jack Dorsey said that Twitter is exploring a subscription model for some of its features. 

The subscription revenue model has problems as well. Many readers are not willing to pay for subscriptions at all, let alone shell out $50 to $420 a year for every publication they’re interested in reading. That means subscription-funded publications only make money from devoted readers.

But blockchain technology makes digital transactions involving just a few cents economically feasible. In that way, digital media companies could erect a paywall that you needn’t buy a subscription to get past. By giving readers the option of paying for a single article at a price that makes sense, publications could recover revenue from casual readers unable or unwilling to subscribe.

Traditional electronic payment systems can’t support transactions this small because they rely on third-party intermediaries, such as banks and credit card companies, that have costs. As a result, credit card companies and digital payment platforms such as Venmo, Stripe, and Paypal typically charge merchants 30 cents plus 2.9 percent per transaction, which are then built into the cost of the goods and services they sell. Even Patreon, which now charges merchants a lower rate for pledges under $3, still takes 10 cents plus 5 percent of the pledge. Any potential profits from transactions at such low rates are thus wiped out by the fees involved in making them. 

Cryptocurrencies remove the need for these costly intermediaries, thereby making instant tiny digital payments possible.

For the cryptocurrency that most people are familiar with, bitcoin, microtransactions haven’t panned out, mainly because the cryptocurrency’s protocol limits the rate at which the network can process transactions. Miners cannot add blocks larger than 1 megabyte to the blockchain, and the protocol adds one new block to the blockchain every 10 minutes, so the system can’t process more than seven transactions per second. For perspective, Visa averages about 2,000 transactions per second and has reached as many as 56,000 per second.

For years, bitcoin’s block size wasn’t an issue, as the network was not large enough to bump up against the size cap. But as the system has become more congested, transactions are taking a long time to process and transaction fees are high. At the moment, it costs about $4 to send bitcoin.

Developers are working to solve this through “second layer” protocols such as the “lightning network,” where transactions can be passed back and forth quickly and cheaply before being added to the underlying blockchain. In the meantime, bitcoin isn’t the only cryptocurrency.

As bitcoin approached the block limit, developers disagreed about whether or not to increase it. So the cryptocurrency split—or “forked”—in 2017, leaving two distinct cryptocurrencies: bitcoin, which maintained the previous block size, and bitcoin cash, which increased its block limit to 32 megabytes. In 2019, bitcoin cash forked again, and yet another currency—bitcoin SV—emerged, having removed the technical cap on the block size entirely.

Today, both bitcoin cash and bitcoin SV enjoy extremely low transaction fees. For the former, the average transaction fee is less than a penny. Bitcoin SV’s is less than a tenth of a penny.

People are building businesses around this technology. For example, Twetch is a social media site similar to Twitter, except that every time you follow someone or favorite a post, you are effectively sending them a few pennies in bitcoin SV. Josh Petty, the app’s co-founder, likens Twetch to the old SMS pay-per-text system. Users pay for every action they take on the app: It costs 2 cents to make a post, 5 cents to like a post, and 10 cents to follow another account. Every time one of these transactions occurs, Twetch takes a penny. 

This revenue model means that Twetch doesn’t have to sell ads or user data. Because the blockchain allows even the smallest transactions to be split and sent to multiple addresses, Twetch can take its share of a transaction without ever holding users’ money. It also allows users to profit from their own content. And it’s taking off—Twetch has surpassed 16,000 users, including Danny Trejo.

Other apps have adopted similar systems. Streamanity, a video streaming platform, uses a “pay to play” framework to let creators monetize their content without relying on ads. Creators can charge as little as a penny per view, and viewers can earn bitcoin SV by sharing videos. Bit.sv, which has yet to officially launch, is a blogging platform like Medium that allows content creators to charge for individual posts. 

According to Ryan Charles, the founder of Money Button—the interface that allows Twetch users to make 2 cent transactions at the push of a button—the technology and the product are all in place for digital media companies to implement a pay-per-article paywall today. But there is still a major non-technical problem to solve before doing so would make sense: Most people don’t have bitcoin SV. Most of the hundreds of apps currently using Money Button, including the social media network Powping and the messaging app Baemail, are used and run by bitcoin SV enthusiasts.

There are a variety of ways publications could encourage users to purchase the necessary cryptocurrency. One technique that Twetch uses is to “gift” new users bitcoin SV in order to help them get started. “We give every user three cents to start, and it costs two cents to post,” explains Petty.

Another option would be for digital media companies to sell “credits.” Publications could offer $10 credits that readers could purchase with a credit card and then spend down on one-off articles. But this approach would fail to capture readers who are unwilling to commit $10 to a publication or are interested only in reading a single article.

Truly unlocking the economic potential of microtransactions would require widespread cryptocurrency adoption. Charles envisions a world in which someone browsing the internet could sign into The New York Times—or any other publication—through their preferred cryptocurrency wallet the same way they can sign in with a Gmail account now.

Some question whether a blockchain can scale to handle a global volume of microtransactions without destabilizing the network. Handling a huge volume of transactions in every block would make mining expensive, which could lead to an “extreme centralization” of the network that would threaten its security. For that reason, many think second-layer solutions like the lightning network are a better approach. Others point out that bitcoin SV can already manage a high volume of transactions. Earlier this year, Bitcoin Association reported that the currency’s scaling test network sustained “1,300 transactions per second for a prolonged period, in addition to handling a peak load of 6,400 transactions per second,” approaching Visa’s typical rate.

It’s not clear if either system will ever be popular enough to work in the mainstream media. But with subscription rates remaining low and ad revenue erratic, it may be time to give cryptocurrencies some serious consideration.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3aaUaW8
via IFTTT

Trump’s Latest Executive Actions Are Likely Ineffective and Possibly Unconstitutional

reason-trump7

President Donald Trump issued a series of executive actions Saturday intended to extend coronavirus relief measures in the absence of legislation by Congress. Their legality and practical effect are still being debated.

Of the four actions issued by the president over the weekend, the least controversial appears to be a memorandum allowing for the deferral of payments on federally held student loans until the end of the year. Trump had issued a similar order in March that deferred payments until September. That order was later codified in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

More contentious, but less impactful, is an executive order issued by Trump that attempts to limit evictions and foreclosures.

The CARES Act had suspended evictions at multifamily properties with a federally backed mortgage until July 24. It also granted homeowners up to 360 days of forbearance on federally backed mortgage loans.

The president’s Saturday order does not reinstate that eviction moratorium. It instead asks the secretary of health and human services to “consider whether any measures temporarily halting residential evictions of any tenants for failure to pay rent” would be necessary to prevent interstate transmission of COVID-19.

It also orders the secretaries of the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to identify available federal funds that could be used to provide temporary rent and mortgage assistance for those struggling to pay their housing bills. This falls far short of the national ban on evictions and $175 billion in emergency homeowner and renter assistance passed by the House back in May, and housing activists aren’t happy about it:

Trump’s memorandums dealing with payroll taxes and unemployment benefits have sparked the most controversy.

One memo orders a deferral, but not forgiveness, of payroll taxes for employees making less than $4,000 per biweekly pay period until the end of the year. Workers would still be on the hook for these taxes come the end of the year, although Trump’s memo also asks the treasury secretary to “explore avenues, including legislation” to forgive this tax bill.

In addition, Trump issued a memorandum partially extending the now-expired federal unemployment aid provided for in the CARES Act. That bill had provided jobless workers with a $600 weekly unemployment bonus. The president’s order calls for a $400 weekly unemployment benefit to be paid out of the Department of Homeland Security’s Disaster Relief Fund.

The aid would continue until the $70 billion Disaster Relief Fund is drawn down to $25 billion, or until December 6, 2020—whichever comes first. State governors would have to ask for this funding before receiving it. They’d also be required to chip in $100 of the $400 unemployment benefit.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has called Trump’s executive orders unconstitutional, while also saying they do too little to help struggling families.

In a Sunday National Review column, American Enterprise Institute scholars Yuval Levin and Adam White similarly argue that Trump’s executive actions on payroll taxes and unemployment benefits, while potentially legal, undermine Congress’ constitutionally granted power of the purse.

“If the Constitution is more than a law, if it establishes a system of government with a particular character, then there could hardly be any question that a presidential action explicitly setting out to change federal policy regarding both spending and taxing, and to do so precisely because Congress has declined to take these steps, violates that character,” write Levin and White.

Rep. Justin Amash (L–Mich.) likewise criticized the president’s actions as an example of executive overreach.

In the wake of these executive orders, Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin have both said they are willing to restart stalled talks on another relief package.


FREE MINDS

Hong Kong police have arrested business tycoon and publisher Jimmy Lai for violating the semi-autonomous Chinese city’s new national security law.

Lai is the owner of Next Digital, which publishes the pro-democracy Apple Daily newspaper. Lai’s two sons were also arrested, as were four other Next Digital executives. Police also stormed Apple Daily‘s offices. Videos posted to Twitter show officers rifling through journalists’ papers.

A number of press freedom groups, including the International Press Institute and the Committee to Protect Journalists, have criticized Lai’s arrest and called for his release.


QUICK HITS

  • Protests have erupted in Belarus after early returns show its longtime President Alexander Lukashenko, often called “Europe’s last dictator,” winning a sixth term in a landslide.

  • Amazon and mall operator Simon Property Group are reportedly in talks to convert shuttered Sears and J.C. Penney stores into fulfillment centers, reports The Wall Street Journal.
  • The Trump administration’s plan to help the struggling camera maker Eastman Kodak remake itself as a pharmaceutical company with a $765 million loan underwritten by taxpayers is reportedly stalled following scrutiny from Congress and regulators. That loan, Reason‘s Eric Boehm noted last week, came after Kodak spent $870,000 on lobbying expenses.
  • Rioting broke out in downtown Chicago last night.
  • Protesters in Portland, Oregon, set fire to police union headquarters.
  • A California church held indoor services in violation of a restraining order issued by a judge declaring such gatherings a “menace to public health,” reports the Los Angeles Times.
  • The New York Times has the backstory on how 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate were left sitting in a Beruit warehouse for seven years while Lebanese officials ignored warnings about the safety hazard they posed.
  • A proposed New York bill would mandate that “shampoo assistants” complete 500 hours of training before being allowed to legally ply their trade. Critics have decried that requirement as absurd and unnecessary. Proponents of the bill argue it would actually make the state’s licensing laws less burdensome by making it clear that shampooers do not need to obtain a full cosmetology license, which requires 1,000 hours of training.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3fMgDtX
via IFTTT

Trump’s Latest Executive Actions Are Likely Ineffective and Possibly Unconstitutional

reason-trump7

President Donald Trump issued a series of executive actions Saturday intended to extend coronavirus relief measures in the absence of legislation by Congress. Their legality and practical effect are still being debated.

Of the four actions issued by the president over the weekend, the least controversial appears to be a memorandum allowing for the deferral of payments on federally held student loans until the end of the year. Trump had issued a similar order in March that deferred payments until September. That order was later codified in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

More contentious, but less impactful, is an executive order issued by Trump that attempts to limit evictions and foreclosures.

The CARES Act had suspended evictions at multifamily properties with a federally backed mortgage until July 24. It also granted homeowners up to 360 days of forbearance on federally backed mortgage loans.

The president’s Saturday order does not reinstate that eviction moratorium. It instead asks the secretary of health and human services to “consider whether any measures temporarily halting residential evictions of any tenants for failure to pay rent” would be necessary to prevent interstate transmission of COVID-19.

It also orders the secretaries of the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to identify available federal funds that could be used to provide temporary rent and mortgage assistance for those struggling to pay their housing bills. This falls far short of the national ban on evictions and $175 billion in emergency homeowner and renter assistance passed by the House back in May, and housing activists aren’t happy about it:

Trump’s memorandums dealing with payroll taxes and unemployment benefits have sparked the most controversy.

One memo orders a deferral, but not forgiveness, of payroll taxes for employees making less than $4,000 per biweekly pay period until the end of the year. Workers would still be on the hook for these taxes come the end of the year, although Trump’s memo also asks the treasury secretary to “explore avenues, including legislation” to forgive this tax bill.

In addition, Trump issued a memorandum partially extending the now-expired federal unemployment aid provided for in the CARES Act. That bill had provided jobless workers with a $600 weekly unemployment bonus. The president’s order calls for a $400 weekly unemployment benefit to be paid out of the Department of Homeland Security’s Disaster Relief Fund.

The aid would continue until the $70 billion Disaster Relief Fund is drawn down to $25 billion, or until December 6, 2020—whichever comes first. State governors would have to ask for this funding before receiving it. They’d also be required to chip in $100 of the $400 unemployment benefit.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has called Trump’s executive orders unconstitutional, while also saying they do too little to help struggling families.

In a Sunday National Review column, American Enterprise Institute scholars Yuval Levin and Adam White similarly argue that Trump’s executive actions on payroll taxes and unemployment benefits, while potentially legal, undermine Congress’ constitutionally granted power of the purse.

“If the Constitution is more than a law, if it establishes a system of government with a particular character, then there could hardly be any question that a presidential action explicitly setting out to change federal policy regarding both spending and taxing, and to do so precisely because Congress has declined to take these steps, violates that character,” write Levin and White.

Rep. Justin Amash (L–Mich.) likewise criticized the president’s actions as an example of executive overreach.

In the wake of these executive orders, Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin have both said they are willing to restart stalled talks on another relief package.


FREE MINDS

Hong Kong police have arrested business tycoon and publisher Jimmy Lai for violating the semi-autonomous Chinese city’s new national security law.

Lai is the owner of Next Digital, which publishes the pro-democracy Apple Daily newspaper. Lai’s two sons were also arrested, as were four other Next Digital executives. Police also stormed Apple Daily‘s offices. Videos posted to Twitter show officers rifling through journalists’ papers.

A number of press freedom groups, including the International Press Institute and the Committee to Protect Journalists, have criticized Lai’s arrest and called for his release.


QUICK HITS

  • Protests have erupted in Belarus after early returns show its longtime President Alexander Lukashenko, often called “Europe’s last dictator,” winning a sixth term in a landslide.

  • Amazon and mall operator Simon Property Group are reportedly in talks to convert shuttered Sears and J.C. Penney stores into fulfillment centers, reports The Wall Street Journal.
  • The Trump administration’s plan to help the struggling camera maker Eastman Kodak remake itself as a pharmaceutical company with a $765 million loan underwritten by taxpayers is reportedly stalled following scrutiny from Congress and regulators. That loan, Reason‘s Eric Boehm noted last week, came after Kodak spent $870,000 on lobbying expenses.
  • Rioting broke out in downtown Chicago last night.
  • Protesters in Portland, Oregon, set fire to police union headquarters.
  • A California church held indoor services in violation of a restraining order issued by a judge declaring such gatherings a “menace to public health,” reports the Los Angeles Times.
  • The New York Times has the backstory on how 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate were left sitting in a Beruit warehouse for seven years while Lebanese officials ignored warnings about the safety hazard they posed.
  • A proposed New York bill would mandate that “shampoo assistants” complete 500 hours of training before being allowed to legally ply their trade. Critics have decried that requirement as absurd and unnecessary. Proponents of the bill argue it would actually make the state’s licensing laws less burdensome by making it clear that shampooers do not need to obtain a full cosmetology license, which requires 1,000 hours of training.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3fMgDtX
via IFTTT

Openness and Privacy in Court Cases Dealing with Litigants’ Medical Information

An interesting opinion by the Seventh Circuit in Mitze v. Saul (Judges Ripple, Hamilton & Scudder):

[A.] Years after Brenda Mitze unsuccessfully appealed the denial of her application for social security benefits, she moved to seal court decisions and other records, claiming that their publication violated her right to keep her medical information private. The district court denied the motion and we affirm….

[B.] We omit the details that led Mitze to apply for disability benefits in 2009, as they are unnecessary to the disposition of this appeal. The Commissioner found she was not disabled and denied her application. Suffice it to say she was unable to establish that a medically determinable impairment precluded her from engaging in past relevant work or other gainful employment. On review the district court upheld the Commissioner’s decision. We did too.

Several years later, Mitze filed a motion to seal her “medical information … and all other information pertaining to [her] case.” She complained of “harassing phone calls from solicitors” who knew her personal medical information because the courts had “publicized” it by issuing opinions announcing the affirmance of the ALJ’s decision.

The district court denied Mitze’s motion. It first noted that remote electronic access to filings containing Mitze’s medical records already was limited to the parties and their attorneys. (Full access, however, is available to the public at the courthouse.) To the extent that Mitze wished to seal the district and appellate court opinions—both of which recounted her medical facts in detail—the district court determined she offered no reason to overturn the “long-standing tradition” of granting public access to the courts’ decisions. Finally, the district court concluded that it had no authority to require news outlets to remove articles about those decisions from the internet.

On appeal, Mitze … adds not only that she and her children have experienced social stigma, but also that thieves broke into her home to steal pain medication, which publicly available documents revealed that she had been prescribed….

[C.] [A] strong presumption exists in favor of publishing dispositional orders. Even in cases involving substantial countervailing privacy interests such as state secrets, trade secrets, and attorney-client privilege, courts have opted for redacting instead of sealing the order or opinion….

Balancing the public’s right to transparent court proceedings and a litigant’s personal privacy interests is difficult, particularly when it comes to those seeking benefits based on health concerns. We sympathize with a claimant who feels as though her medical information should not be publicized simply because she chooses to avail herself of her right to judicial review. It might be that the existing remedies of proceeding anonymously, requesting redactions, or sealing records fall short of what is needed in the social security context.

To be sure, the public has “a right to know who is using [its] courts.” Under the current standard, a plaintiff wishing to proceed anonymously must rebut the presumption that parties’ identities are public information by showing that her need for anonymity outweighs the harm of concealment. But we question whether a uniform practice of social security opinions bearing only claimants’ initials would negatively impact the government or public interest in any meaningful way.

We leave that balancing for another day. All we need to say in the case before us is that it is too late for Mitze. Given everything that has transpired over the years, we cannot revisit the application of these standard practices regarding the publication of judicial decisions and orders in social security matters.

[D.] Mitze’s circumstances fall outside the “very few categories” for which we have recognized that confidentiality is appropriate…. “[E]mbarrassment, incrimination, or exposure to further litigation will not, without more, compel the court to seal its records.” ….

When unsuccessful applicants for disability benefits seek judicial review, they can expect (at least under today’s practices) that the medical basis of the claim will become public. In such cases, federal courts have a responsibility to review the decision of an administrative law judge to determine whether there is substantial evidence—primarily medical evidence—in the administrative record to support the decision. We do so in reasoned decisions issued to the parties and made available to the public.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure draw a line at protecting medical records themselves, and redaction of personal identifying information such as social security numbers is required. But mere discussion of the factual basis for a disability claim is not grounds for preventing the publication of judicial decisions….

[E.] Mitze’s two remaining arguments also fail. News outlets have the right to publish information obtained from public court records, so we cannot order an outlet to remove from its website articles reporting on the decisions in her case. And to the extent Mitze argues that the courts or the press making the details of her case public violates the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, she has not explained how. The Act regulates the disclosure of information by only healthcare providers and their affiliates.

 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2FdsULz
via IFTTT