MSNBC, ABC Claim Elon Musk Wants To See Abuse Of Women & Jews, And A Return To Apartheid

MSNBC, ABC Claim Elon Musk Wants To See Abuse Of Women & Jews, And A Return To Apartheid

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

Amid the meltdown of leftists canceling themselves following Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover, the most extreme reactions came from the likes of MSNBC’s Joy Reid and ABC’s The View, where it was declared that Musk is a white supremacist who wants to see the return of segregation, as well as abuse of Jewish people and rampant misogyny against women.

Perpetual race grifter Reid proclaimed that Musk “misses the old South Africa in the 80s. He wants that back,”  adding “Elon Musk’s companies have a history of open racism.”

She also charged that Musk’s “idea of freedom means freedom to be a jerk and to be cruel and to have no one be able to stop you.”

Reid’s guest Jason Johnson then declared that Musk could make public everyone’s private Twitter messages, before she declared that free speech advocates only want to “come in and be able to punch people in the face and walk around and laugh about it and then not have anyone be able to stop them.”

Reid then stated that “there was a time when people had the double hashtags around their names because they were Jewish and right-wingers were saying get in the oven any time you made any benign comment on Twitter.”

She added “They attacked women. You know, the misogyny was crazy on Twitter for a while,” insinuating that Musk is all for that kind of activity.

“The thing is the enjoyment they get out of being in this town square is being able to harass people, being able to attack people,” she further stated.

Watch:

Reid stirred up the Apartheid accusation on Twitter (ironically), and also suggested that Musk is keen on allowing “nazis” free reign on Twitter:

Others amplified the idiotic claim:

Elon Musk is from South Africa, so that means he loves white nationalism. Yeah, OK. Just like every German is a Nazi.

It’s completely deranged, but what else would you expect from Reid? She says this about everyone who disagrees with her on any topic.

Over at ABC, The View co-host Sunny Hostin declared that Musk only cares about free speech for “straight white men” and is preparing to “take away the guardrails” and “unleash the trolls”.

She then blurted out that “there have been some surveys done” and claimed that 85% of women have seen abuse on Twitter, insinuating that’s what Musk wants to see.

Hostin then whined about Musk being rich and cited Mark Zuckerberg’s “takeover” of Facebook as an example of how billionaires shouldn’t have control over “modes of communication.”

Watch:

Again, completely factually incorrect blathering and deranged accusations, all triggered by Elon Musk saying he supports free speech, and illustrative of exactly why Musk bought Twitter, as Joe Rogan points out below.

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 21:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xU9cstZ Tyler Durden

Oklahoma GOP Governor Sign Nation’s First Law Banning Non-Binary Birth Certificates

Oklahoma GOP Governor Sign Nation’s First Law Banning Non-Binary Birth Certificates

Oklahoma is the first state to write a nonbinary prohibition into law that will ensure “clarity and truth” on official birth documents, according to AP News

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed the bill into law on Tuesday that explicitly says birth certificates will have only male or female gender assignments. The new law comes after an executive order from the governor restricted the Oklahoma State Health Department from adding a nonbinary option. 

“People are free to believe whatever they want about their identity, but science has determined people are either biologically male or female at birth,” said Oklahoma Rep. Sheila Dills, the bill’s House sponsor, in a statement after the bill passed the House last week.

 “We want clarity and truth on official state documents. Information should be based on established medical fact and not an ever-changing social dialogue,” she added.  

Meanwhile, Oklahoma elected the first nonbinary state legislator in the country, Democrat Mauree Turner, in 2020. Turner tweeted this as the bill was being debated last week: 

“I find it a very extreme and grotesque use of power in this body to write this law and try to pass it — when literally none of them live like us.” 

The news comes one month after Gov. Stitt signed a bill prohibiting biological males from competing in girls’ sports. 

It’s worth noting the Biden administration recently announced making an “X” gender on US passports. 

According to the think tank Movement Advancement Project, sixteen states and the District of Columbia have already allowed gender marker designation besides male or female. 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 21:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/kqnlgxK Tyler Durden

Mask Mandates Make Comeback To US College Campuses

Mask Mandates Make Comeback To US College Campuses

Authored by Bill Pan via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Two months after the federal government eased mask recommendations for most Americans, some colleges and universities have reinstated mask mandates, along with other measures, citing surges in COVID-19 cases on their campuses.

Columbia University in New York City on May 10, 2021. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Several prominent institutions—including American University and Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.; Columbia University in New York; Johns Hopkins University in Maryland; and Rice University in Texas, to name a few—have brought back indoor mask requirements that were phased out not too long ago.

Many of these schools already have vaccine and booster mandates. For example, Columbia required all students and employees to submit proof of their booster vaccination before March, boasting an overall 99.9 percent compliance rate for the campus community. Yet it now demands that students wear surgical masks in classrooms because of an uptick of COVID-19 cases on campus and elsewhere in New York City.

“Based on the current situation and in an abundance of caution, we will require wearing of non-cloth masks in classrooms,” the Ivy League school announced on April 10. In a more recent update, the university said the requirement wouldn’t go away any time soon, despite an overwhelmingly high level of vaccination among the campus population.

“We anticipate making no changes in our current campus COVID-19 guidance, unless New York City puts in place measures that we would be required to follow,” Columbia officials said on April 22, noting a “gradual increase in COVID-19 cases” in the city.

Rice also requires all eligible students and employees to get booster shots. In mid-March, the Houston-based university lifted its mask mandate for vaccinated individuals, only to reverse the policy after less than a month because of a sudden rise in COVID-19 cases.

“There’s been a significant rise in the number of positive cases reported in our community—about 145,” the university said in an April 10 statement. Specifically, Rice demanded that everyone in a classroom wear a mask regardless of their vaccination status, except for instructors while lecturing, since 90 percent of those new cases have occurred among undergraduate students. Large events also have been canceled. Students can continue to eat in dining halls, but at half of the designated capacity.

According to a COVID-19 tracker on Rice’s website, the university has recorded 31 positive tests for the week following Easter. There’s also been a noticeable downward trajectory since April 10, but the restrictions remain in place.

Meanwhile, in Philadelphia, health officials and the mayor raised the city’s COVID-19 alert level on April 18, requiring citizens to wear face coverings when out in public. That has prompted a number of schools, including the University of Pennsylvania, Temple, St. Joseph’s, La Salle, Drexel, and Thomas Jefferson universities, to require students and staff to mask up while in school buildings.

All of these Philadelphia schools went mask-optional again just three days later, when the city announced that it not only has reversed the decision to reimpose the mask mandate, but also ditched the COVID-19 alert system that triggered it.

The infection rate is going down, hospitalizations are going down, and, frankly, the ruling in Florida confused a lot of stuff. SEPTA is doing what they did and confused a lot of stuff,” said Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney.

Kenney was referring to a U.S. district judge in Florida who struck down a federal rule requiring face coverings for planes and other forms of public transportation, as well as the decision by SEPTA, Pennsylvania’s regional transit authority, to lift the requirement that travelers must wear masks on its buses and trains.

Florida’s universities were among the earliest in the nation to drop their mask mandates. South Florida University has been mask-optional since August 2021, while the University of Florida said it simply doesn’t have the authority to force people to mask up on campus.

“The university does not currently have the authority to take the actions you recommend,” University of Florida President Kent Fuchs wrote in response to the Alachua County Commission, which had asked the school to adhere to a public health emergency declaration that mandated masks indoors.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 20:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Bk8c5Up Tyler Durden

Whistleblower Son Of Deutsche Banker Who Committed Suicide, Found Dead In LA

Whistleblower Son Of Deutsche Banker Who Committed Suicide, Found Dead In LA

The body of Valentin Broeksmit was found early on Monday morning on the 4500 block of Multnomah Street on Monday, according to the Los Angeles County coroner’s office.

45-year-old Broeksmit was reported missing last year, with the LAPD saying he was last seen on April 6, 2021 around 4 p.m., at Griffith Park on Riverside Drive driving a 2020 red Mini Cooper.

But he continued tweeting under the handle @BikiniRobotArmy during this period).

His last tweet:

If that names rings a vague bell, it should.

Self-described as a “comically terrible spy”, Broeksmit was best known for his brief moment in the spotlight as he reportedly worked with federal authorities investigating the activities of Deutsche Bank and its ties with former President Donald Trump.

Journalist Scott Stedman, who writes at the Forensic News website, also confirmed Broeksmit’s death in a tweet.

He supplied me and other journalists with Deutsche Bank documents that highlighted the bank’s deep Russia connections,” Stedman wrote.

“It is very sad. I don’t suspect foul play. Val struggled with drugs on and off.

“In truth, I hadn’t talked to Val since January and before that many more months. I wish I had.”

Broeksmit was reportedly “pretty troubled” for many years

Given the circumstances, perhaps most sadly is the fact that, as we detailed in 2016, Valentin was the son of high-ranking Deutsche Bank banker William Broeksmit who committed suicide at age 58 – found hanging in his London flat from a dog leash tied to the top of a door.

As we reported at the time, financial papers had been strewn about the scene of his suicide, and on a dog bed near the body were a number of notes to family and friends. One was addressed to Deutsche Bank CEO Anshu Jain, with an apology. That note offered no clue as to the reason he was sorry.

It was reportedly the papers left behind by his father than Valentine Broeksmit had offered to federal investigators (and he was subpoenaed by the House Intelligence Committee during its probe of Trump’s ties to the bank).

New York Times reporter David Enrich wrote in 2019 that Broeksmit helped the FBI in its probe of Deutsche Bank, noting that Broeksmit had drug-use issues and would often bend the truth to come up with “far-fetched theories.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 20:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/jJKY74Z Tyler Durden

Plastic Grocery Bag Bans Actually Boost Sale Of Small Plastic Garbage Bags: Study

Plastic Grocery Bag Bans Actually Boost Sale Of Small Plastic Garbage Bags: Study

Authored by Nathan Worcester via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Researchers have discovered that bans and fees on plastic carryout grocery bags (CGB) could have serious unintended consequences.

A woman leaves a grocery store using plastic bags in Mississauga, Ontario, on Aug.15, 2019. (Nathan Denette/The Canadian Press)

The investigators found that both bag fees and outright prohibitions boosted the sale of 4-gallon and 8-gallon plastic bags—in line with the view that many consumers reuse their supposedly single-use bags as garbage bags around the house.

The effect of a 5¢ fee for either paper or plastic CGBs is essentially the same as that of a ban on plastic bag and a fee of 10 or 15¢ on paper bags. While policy makers may choose fees over bans in order to soften the blow, our results suggest that the overall effect on consumers is little different,” wrote the authors, professor Richard Woodward of Texas A&M University (TAMU) and Yu-Kai Huang of both TAMU and the University of Georgia.

Woodward and Huang used Nielsen retail scanner data from Washington; Santa Clara County, California; San Luis Obispo County, California; and Montgomery County, Maryland between 2006 and 2014. All four had passed restrictions on carryout grocery bags before 2014.

They used nearby counties that had not implemented such measures as controls.

Huang and Woodward found that plastic bag laws did not impact the sale of larger bags, lending additional support to the view that small plastic garbage bags end up substituting for the regulated grocery bags.

The study comes at a time when laws regulating the sale of plastic grocery bags are spreading rapidly throughout the United States and the wider world.

Chicago, for example, charges a tax of 7 cents per plastic bag.

Uniform plastic bag fees are a regressive tax because people pay the same amount no matter their wealth or income.

Carryout plastic bag bans have been passed in California, New York, Maine, Vermont, Oregon, Hawaii, Delaware, and Connecticut.

Such bags have also been banned in China, New Zealand, and many other countries, including several African countries.

In Kenya, for instance, people caught producing, importing, or using banned plastic bags can suffer major fines or even imprisonment.

Woodward and Huang estimated that plastic bag regulations led stores to purchase an average of 127 more pounds of plastic each month because of the substitution of small plastic garbage bags for carryout bags.

While we are unable to tell the net effect on plastic consumption, because of the heavier weight of purchased trash bags, it is possible that a bag ban could even lead to an increase in total plastic waste, and this is without taking into account any plastic content in purchased CGBs that consumers buy, and eventually discard, as a result of the ban,” the authors noted in the study.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Plastics Industry Association for comment.

The Epoch Times has also contacted an anti-single use plastic group, the Footprint Foundation. The Footprint Foundation is associated with Footprint, a materials science firm that aims to replace single-use plastics with plant-based alternatives.

In addition, The Epoch Times has reached out to the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group known for its opposition to single-use plastics.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 20:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/meJDgkh Tyler Durden

Iran & China Declare Deepened Military Cooperation To Confront ‘US Unilateralism’

Iran & China Declare Deepened Military Cooperation To Confront ‘US Unilateralism’

The anti-West axis appears to be growing on the peripheries of the Ukraine conflict as Washington is perceived as giving an unbending ‘with us or against us’ ultimatum. Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi hailed deepening strategic and military cooperation between the Islamic Republic and China on Wednesday.

According state media cited in The Associated Press, “Raisi told China’s Minister of National Defense Wei Fenghe that Tehran sees its ties with Beijing as strategic. Closer cooperation would serve to confront what the Iranian president described as U.S. unilateralism as talks to revive Tehran’s nuclear deal with world powers have stalled.”

Wednesday’s meeting in Terhan, Iranian Presidency Office via AP

Raisi appeared to indirectly reference the US and perhaps NATO, which included urging the two countries to cooperate in “Confronting unilateralism and creating stability and order is possible through cooperation of independent and like-minded powers.”

Wei too seemed to remotely reference the Ukraine crisis and the West’s economic war against Russia when he said China and Iran could deepen security ties “particularly in the current critical and tense situation.” And more, per the AP:

Wei said his visit was aimed at “improving the strategic defense cooperation” between Iran and China — cooperation that he said would have a “remarkable” impact in defusing unilateralism and fighting terrorism.

The harshest and most direct criticism aimed at Washington came from Iran’s defense chief, Gen. Mohammad Reza Ashtinai, who blasted US militarism and aggression abroad.

Ashtinai said, “wherever the U.S. has had military presence, it has created waves of insecurity, instability, rifts, pessimism, war, destruction and displacement.”

Iran’s Gen. Ashtinai is expected to visit China next as head of a military delegation from the Islamic Republic at the invitation of Beijing, in furtherance of the declared deepened defense and strategic ties. Recently, in 2021, the two countries signed a 25-year strategic cooperation agreement focusing on industrial development, infrastructure and transportation.

Multiple of the world’s largest economies have recently seen their leaders either sit on the fence regarding US pressure to jump on the Russia sanctions bandwagon, or outright blame NATO for stoking the conflict, as was the case with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa…

Officials in Tehran have this week voiced their view that Washington will be forced back to the negotiating table in Vienna amid the stalled nuclear deal due to events in Ukraine and the resulting European energy crisis. Earlier this month Iran said that it considers all that’s needed for a renewed JCPOA agreement as essentially a ‘done deal’ – but that it’s the US that’s stalling.

“Failure to reach a deal [so far] is a result of domestic troubles in the US but the ever-increasing problems caused by the Ukraine war will put pressure on [President Joe] Biden to accept the necessity of a deal [with Tehran],” a spokesman for Iranian delegation to the Vienna nuclear talks said to official news agency IRNA on Sunday.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 19:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/QmDrY7Z Tyler Durden

More Secret Gender Transition Closets Discovered In Public Schools

More Secret Gender Transition Closets Discovered In Public Schools

Authored by Alice Giordano via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

They started in colleges, but trans closets—rooms stocked with transgender clothes and accessories for students to change into after arriving to school and back out of before going home—are being discovered in public schools with some indication they are being kept a secret from parents.

Students walk to their classrooms at a public middle school in Los Angeles, on Sept. 10, 2021. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)

In a recent TikTok video, a California teacher implies that the trans closet he started at the high school where he works is meant to be kept from parents.

The goal of the transition closet is for our students to wear the clothes that their parents approve of, come to school and then swap out into the clothes that fit who they truly are,” the teacher said.

The California Family Council and others eventually confirmed the identity of the teacher as Oakland Unified School District Spanish teacher Thomas Martin-Edwards, who is also the founder of “Queer Teacher Fellowship.”

Martin-Edwards, the teacher who runs the trans closet, is also transgender. He has posted videos of himself in the classroom showing off the stilettos he wears to school.

Neither Martin-Edwards, a former assistant principal in another school district, nor the school responded to inquiries by The Epoch Times about the trans closet.

This is [an] example of the deceit schools are deliberately using to carry out a growing transgender movement in public schools behind the backs of parents,” the Christian conservative group California Family Council wrote on its website.

“In addition to gender ideology madness, this school is teaching children that it is acceptable to defy their parents.”

California Family Council first discovered the trans closet through a Facebook posting by a nonprofit group that calls itself “The Transition Closet.”

On its Facebook page, The Transition Closet states it is working with one of the district’s high schools to create a trans closet—posting “we are extremely excited to begin our journey in working with Fremont High School of Oakland, California, along with our favorite teacher of TikTok/@justaqueerteacher.”

Amare Roush, founder of The Transition Closet, told The Epoch Times that her organization does support keeping the existence of trans closets at schools secret from parents, because of the abuse she says children often face at home if they disclose to their parents they are transgender.

“We do provide a safe space for kids whose parents are not accepting, because it’s known to help lower the suicide rate,” said Roush who is also a certified advocate for domestic violence victims.

These kids are going to do it anyway, we just want a way to provide them with a way to do it safely to where they’re not wearing clothes that are too small for them, or doing so in a way that’s going to get them hurt by their parents.”

Roush emphasized that school was the best venue to provide trans kids with trans clothing.

“Kids are at schools 40 hours a week, that’s where they spend most of the time, that’s where they form most of their relationships,” she said, “clothing is a big part of how we express ourselves and those kids that are able to express themselves correctly, are able to feel supported correctly.”

Another trans closet being operated out of the Denver Conservatory Green Middle School in Colorado was also recently posted about on social media.

The Twitter post ignited a flurry of messages slamming the school for encouraging transgenderism among students as young as 12 years old.

This is grooming,” tweeted one Colorado man, “Police should come to the classroom and arrest whoever the teacher is in this classroom.

The school also did not respond to inquiries from The Epoch Times.

The original post about the Denver trans closet was made by “Buy Nothing Central Park” and refers to the closet for transgender students as being started at “our school.” It also asks for clothing for the trans closet being dropped off at the school.

Megan Fox, a freelance columnist for PJ Media and co-host of the weekly YouTube show “Exposing Family Court Corruption,” recently raised $1,650 through gofundme.com to pay for documents relating to the trans closet at a Colorado school.

Fox recently wrote in her column that the school told her she had to pay $1,650 to obtain the documents, which she requested via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). According to Fox, the school said the bill was based on 55 hours of staff time at $30 an hour to fulfill her request.

On its website, The Transition Closet states that “the near future holds transition closet[s] and services throughout the school district for students of the Trans/Nonbinary/Intersex and additional LGBTQIA+ community members.”

Roush said her organization is working with other schools in the United States to start trans closets and her organization currently runs them at several churches including Lutheran, Episcopalian, and Methodist churches.

For the California school trans closet, the Arkansas-based group also includes contact information linked to the website validbybrodie.com, which includes a “start your own closet” section for students, teachers, and school administrators.

It has also adopted the slogan “when your [sic] ready to come out of the closet, step into ours” and has an online shop that includes a variety of transgender accessories.

It also sells transgender workbooks for teens and runs online name change clinics.

Roush emphasized that transgender accessories are never supplied to minors without a parent’s permission.

She said that transgender kids ended up physically hurting themselves by using duct tape instead of transgender accessories to hide their genitals.

“Nobody would ask for this; we are just trying to ease the transition of kids that are dealing with this,”‘ she said.

Her group also works with colleges to establish transition closets.

Marshall University, the University of Arkansas, Penn State, and the University of California are among colleges that have been operating trans closets for years.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 19:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/W6tGd09 Tyler Durden

A Different Sort of “Don’t Say Gay”

From today’s decision by Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr.  (M.D. Tenn.) in B.A.P. v. Overton County Bd. of Ed.:

When B.A.P. arrived in Henson’s classroom on August 25, 2020, she was wearing a shirt stating, “homosexuality is a sin – 1 Corinthians 6:9-10.” This shirt “express[ed] [B.A.P.’s] political viewpoint founded upon her religious beliefs,” including her belief “in the Biblical mandate to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

Henson told B.A.P. to report to the principal’s office, and she complied. Principal Melton read from the school handbook and told B.A.P. that her shirt violated the dress code because it was “sexually connotative.” … Melton told B.A.P. that she would not be released from the office unless she changed her shirt. Melton then instructed B.A.P. to call her parents and request a change of clothing …. B.A.P.’s father, Richard Penkoski, … asked Melton for clarification on his interpretation of the dress code. Melton read from the dress code and clarified that B.A.P.’s shirt might be sexually connotative because the word “homosexuality” on her shirt included the word “sex.” Melton told Penkoski that B.A.P. would be forced to go home if she did not change her shirt, and the call ended. B.A.P.’s stepmother came to the school and took her home, and B.A.P. was marked “absent” for the day. “At all material times,” Melton and Henson demanded that B.A.P. not wear the shirt to school again.

Plaintiffs maintain that B.A.P.’s shirt was consistent with an established practice of openly acknowledging issues of sexuality in the classroom setting. Specifically, Henson’s classroom displayed what appears to be a standard 8.5×11 piece of printer paper affixed to a cabinet near the corner bearing the colors of the rainbow and the words, “diverse, inclusive, accepting, welcoming, safe space, for everyone.” Plaintiffs characterize this image as “pro-homosexual.” …

In Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. School Dist. (1969), the Supreme Court explained that schools may regulate student speech that “materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others.” {B.A.P.’s shirt did not display “‘indecent,’ ‘lewd,’ or ‘vulgar’ speech,” as contemplated by Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986).} Tinker presents a “difficult question: how to balance some students’ rights to free speech with ‘the rights of other students to be secure and to be let alone.'” {The Tennessee legislature recognizes that “[a] safe and civil environment is necessary for students to learn and achieve high academic standards,” and that “[h]arassment, intimidation, bullying or cyber-bullying, like other disruptive or violent behavior, is conduct that disrupts a student’s ability to learn and a school’s ability to educate its students in a safe environment.”} “[T]o justify prohibition of a particular expression of opinion” under Tinker, a school must show that it acted out of “‘more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint,’ but rather, ‘that the school authorities had reason to anticipate that the [student’s expression] would substantially interfere with the work of the school or would impinge upon the rights of other students.'”

Schools, it bears emphasizing, are not required to wait for student speech to actually disrupt the school environment or interfere with other students’ rights before acting. “Nor does Tinker ‘require certainty that disruption will occur.'” Indeed, “[s]chool officials have an affirmative duty … to prevent [disruptions] from happening in the first place,” and “‘[f]orecasting disruption is unmistakably difficult to do.'” Therefore, the touchstone of Tinker is reasonability—”whether the record demonstrates ‘any facts which might reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities.'”

Here, an adequate analysis of B.A.P.’s First Amendment claims against Melton and Henson requires a more developed record than is available on a motion to dismiss. Courts typically conduct a context-dependent inquiry to determine whether a school official’s forecast of disruption was reasonable. On this Motion, the Court can only consider the allegations in the Amended Complaint, which state a plausible claim for relief. Plaintiffs allege that Henson removed B.A.P. from class due to the message on her shirt, Melton did not allow her to return to class because of this message, and both Melton and Henson told B.A.P. she could not wear the shirt to school going forward. The Amended Complaint does not, however, supply specific facts and context about Livingston Academy and the surrounding community at the time Melton and Henson took these actions. Without this context, the Court cannot determine whether Melton and Henson reasonably forecasted that the message on B.A.P.’s shirt would cause substantial disruption or interference with the rights of other students. Accordingly, B.A.P.’s First Amendment claims against Melton and Henson will not be dismissed for failure to state a claim.

For largely the same reasons, the Court declines to resolve Melton and Henson’s alternative defense of qualified immunity at this time…. Where “granting relief to the plaintiff can only be done by recognizing a novel constitutional right,” granting qualified immunity to a defendant may be appropriate prior to factual development. But that is not necessarily the case where “the clearly established inquiry may turn on case-specific details that must be fleshed out in discovery.” … [R]esolving the question of qualified immunity for these claims is a task better suited for summary judgment than a motion to dismiss….

“Most parents, realistically, have no choice but to send their children to a public school and little ability to influence what occurs in the school.” Students, for their part, cannot simply opt out of attending school. Over the years, the Supreme Court has explained some of the many ways that the school environment is unique. It is, of course, uniquely important to the vital responsibility of educating children. The school environment is also unusually close-quartered. “[Students] spend the school hours in close association with each other, both in the classroom and during recreation periods. The students in a particular class often know each other and their teachers quite well. Of necessity, teachers have a degree of familiarity with, and authority over, their students that is unparalleled except perhaps in the relationship between parent and child.” And a public school is unique for its openness to all members of the community. “Through [the schoolroom] passes every citizen and public official, from schoolteachers to policemen and prison guards. The values they learn there, they take with them in life.”

Within this tightly packed and diverse environment, it is inevitable that students will encounter and exchange ideas with peers of different backgrounds and beliefs. That is a good thing. But a school cannot advance its educational mission if the interactions between students are so confrontational or contentious that there is no room for ordinary instruction. In recognition of this unavoidable reality, the Constitution recognizes school officials’ power to regulate student expression based on their reasonable belief that one student’s speech will interfere “with the school[‘s] work” or “colli[de] with the rights of other students to be secure and to be let alone.” Whether a given exercise of that power strikes a sufficient balance between protecting an individual student’s First Amendment rights and maintaining a disruption-free environment depends on contextual details that do not lend themselves easily to resolution on the pleadings alone….

Note, of course, that unlike with the Florida law labeled by its adversaries as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, there really is a serious Free Speech Clause issue here: While a K-12 school is generally not constrained by the Free Speech Clause in controlling its own curriculum (including what teachers teach when teaching that curriculum), it is constrained by the Free Speech Clause when it tries to control what students say.

The opinion doesn’t mention what grade the student was in, and I couldn’t find anything about it in the Complaint, either, but some Googling suggests that this happened in 9th grade or thereabouts.

The post A Different Sort of "Don't Say Gay" appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/htzw0BA
via IFTTT

A Different Sort of “Don’t Say Gay”

From today’s decision by Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr.  (M.D. Tenn.) in B.A.P. v. Overton County Bd. of Ed.:

When B.A.P. arrived in Henson’s classroom on August 25, 2020, she was wearing a shirt stating, “homosexuality is a sin – 1 Corinthians 6:9-10.” This shirt “express[ed] [B.A.P.’s] political viewpoint founded upon her religious beliefs,” including her belief “in the Biblical mandate to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

Henson told B.A.P. to report to the principal’s office, and she complied. Principal Melton read from the school handbook and told B.A.P. that her shirt violated the dress code because it was “sexually connotative.” … Melton told B.A.P. that she would not be released from the office unless she changed her shirt. Melton then instructed B.A.P. to call her parents and request a change of clothing …. B.A.P.’s father, Richard Penkoski, … asked Melton for clarification on his interpretation of the dress code. Melton read from the dress code and clarified that B.A.P.’s shirt might be sexually connotative because the word “homosexuality” on her shirt included the word “sex.” Melton told Penkoski that B.A.P. would be forced to go home if she did not change her shirt, and the call ended. B.A.P.’s stepmother came to the school and took her home, and B.A.P. was marked “absent” for the day. “At all material times,” Melton and Henson demanded that B.A.P. not wear the shirt to school again.

Plaintiffs maintain that B.A.P.’s shirt was consistent with an established practice of openly acknowledging issues of sexuality in the classroom setting. Specifically, Henson’s classroom displayed what appears to be a standard 8.5×11 piece of printer paper affixed to a cabinet near the corner bearing the colors of the rainbow and the words, “diverse, inclusive, accepting, welcoming, safe space, for everyone.” Plaintiffs characterize this image as “pro-homosexual.” …

In Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. School Dist. (1969), the Supreme Court explained that schools may regulate student speech that “materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others.” {B.A.P.’s shirt did not display “‘indecent,’ ‘lewd,’ or ‘vulgar’ speech,” as contemplated by Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986).} Tinker presents a “difficult question: how to balance some students’ rights to free speech with ‘the rights of other students to be secure and to be let alone.'” {The Tennessee legislature recognizes that “[a] safe and civil environment is necessary for students to learn and achieve high academic standards,” and that “[h]arassment, intimidation, bullying or cyber-bullying, like other disruptive or violent behavior, is conduct that disrupts a student’s ability to learn and a school’s ability to educate its students in a safe environment.”} “[T]o justify prohibition of a particular expression of opinion” under Tinker, a school must show that it acted out of “‘more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint,’ but rather, ‘that the school authorities had reason to anticipate that the [student’s expression] would substantially interfere with the work of the school or would impinge upon the rights of other students.'”

Schools, it bears emphasizing, are not required to wait for student speech to actually disrupt the school environment or interfere with other students’ rights before acting. “Nor does Tinker ‘require certainty that disruption will occur.'” Indeed, “[s]chool officials have an affirmative duty … to prevent [disruptions] from happening in the first place,” and “‘[f]orecasting disruption is unmistakably difficult to do.'” Therefore, the touchstone of Tinker is reasonability—”whether the record demonstrates ‘any facts which might reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities.'”

Here, an adequate analysis of B.A.P.’s First Amendment claims against Melton and Henson requires a more developed record than is available on a motion to dismiss. Courts typically conduct a context-dependent inquiry to determine whether a school official’s forecast of disruption was reasonable. On this Motion, the Court can only consider the allegations in the Amended Complaint, which state a plausible claim for relief. Plaintiffs allege that Henson removed B.A.P. from class due to the message on her shirt, Melton did not allow her to return to class because of this message, and both Melton and Henson told B.A.P. she could not wear the shirt to school going forward. The Amended Complaint does not, however, supply specific facts and context about Livingston Academy and the surrounding community at the time Melton and Henson took these actions. Without this context, the Court cannot determine whether Melton and Henson reasonably forecasted that the message on B.A.P.’s shirt would cause substantial disruption or interference with the rights of other students. Accordingly, B.A.P.’s First Amendment claims against Melton and Henson will not be dismissed for failure to state a claim.

For largely the same reasons, the Court declines to resolve Melton and Henson’s alternative defense of qualified immunity at this time…. Where “granting relief to the plaintiff can only be done by recognizing a novel constitutional right,” granting qualified immunity to a defendant may be appropriate prior to factual development. But that is not necessarily the case where “the clearly established inquiry may turn on case-specific details that must be fleshed out in discovery.” … [R]esolving the question of qualified immunity for these claims is a task better suited for summary judgment than a motion to dismiss….

“Most parents, realistically, have no choice but to send their children to a public school and little ability to influence what occurs in the school.” Students, for their part, cannot simply opt out of attending school. Over the years, the Supreme Court has explained some of the many ways that the school environment is unique. It is, of course, uniquely important to the vital responsibility of educating children. The school environment is also unusually close-quartered. “[Students] spend the school hours in close association with each other, both in the classroom and during recreation periods. The students in a particular class often know each other and their teachers quite well. Of necessity, teachers have a degree of familiarity with, and authority over, their students that is unparalleled except perhaps in the relationship between parent and child.” And a public school is unique for its openness to all members of the community. “Through [the schoolroom] passes every citizen and public official, from schoolteachers to policemen and prison guards. The values they learn there, they take with them in life.”

Within this tightly packed and diverse environment, it is inevitable that students will encounter and exchange ideas with peers of different backgrounds and beliefs. That is a good thing. But a school cannot advance its educational mission if the interactions between students are so confrontational or contentious that there is no room for ordinary instruction. In recognition of this unavoidable reality, the Constitution recognizes school officials’ power to regulate student expression based on their reasonable belief that one student’s speech will interfere “with the school[‘s] work” or “colli[de] with the rights of other students to be secure and to be let alone.” Whether a given exercise of that power strikes a sufficient balance between protecting an individual student’s First Amendment rights and maintaining a disruption-free environment depends on contextual details that do not lend themselves easily to resolution on the pleadings alone….

Note, of course, that unlike with the Florida law labeled by its adversaries as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, there really is a serious Free Speech Clause issue here: While a K-12 school is generally not constrained by the Free Speech Clause in controlling its own curriculum (including what teachers teach when teaching that curriculum), it is constrained by the Free Speech Clause when it tries to control what students say.

The opinion doesn’t mention what grade the student was in, and I couldn’t find anything about it in the Complaint, either, but some Googling suggests that this happened in 9th grade or thereabouts.

The post A Different Sort of "Don't Say Gay" appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/htzw0BA
via IFTTT

Luongo On Disney’s Demise: “This Is Not The Way”

Luongo On Disney’s Demise: “This Is Not The Way”

Authored by Tom Luongo via Gold, Goats, ‘n Guns blog,

We live in an age of maximum arrogance. When you watch companies with some of the most marketable brands in the world torch them on an altar of political correctness, it’s easy to just think them stupid or going with the flow of history.

But they aren’t.

Because not only do we live in an age of maximal arrogance, we also live in the biggest self-created false realities in human history.

It is the height of irony that the biggest brand in storytelling, Disney, has succumbed to its own arrogance and self-delusion, becoming trapped in a false reality that Disney should dictate the direction humanity should accept.

That’s what lies at the heart of Disney’s troubles today. It arrogantly believed it has an obligation to decide what is and is not culturally acceptable to a majority of its customers. It completely misread the room in thinking a large percentage of its business comes from the insufferably woke suburban moms who are just as fucked up as the kids they’ve raised.

The good news is Disney got the message loud and clear that they are not the arbiters of when it’s appropriate to groom children for adulthood. The bad news is they may not have heard it.

Social media, political pressure and simply the massive extended echo chamber that is California politics suffused Disney’s board and its corporate culture with the mind virus of egalitarianism, eschewing any basic faith in humanity itself.

Since they’ve rejected all forms of god, or submission to a higher authority that wasn’t man-made, Disney decided it was time to undermine all of its properties by coming out of the closet, as it were.

Disney chose poorly.

The Phildickian Nightmare Made Real

I’m a huge Philip K. Dick fan.

Dick wrote dozens of short stories and at least half a dozen important novels focusing on this very problem of false realities leading to a crisis in faith. In Dick’s work those false realities were tangible: You could visit them through drugs or meditation, meet your analogue from an alternate Universe or by nearly dying get trapped in a hellish landscape of someone else’s design.

But in reading these tales, we recognize that they exist as metaphor, like all stories do, to teach us lessons about how to navigate our conflicts and emerge transformed into something better. For all of his wacky situations and conceits, Phil Dick’s stories are all about the most important issues we all face: empathy overcoming shame, pride justifying violence, selfishness justifying nihilism.

Dick’s protagonists are all suffering basic crises of faith. The modern world has let them down, led them on a false path experiencing deep mid-life bouts of ennui as their carefully constructed coping strategies to numb their pain are shattered.

And like all great storytellers Dick chose the fantastical and the weird not just to hide real human stories as enticements, but also, I’d argue, to make them far more memorable than they would have been otherwise.

UBIK, for example, has been hailed as one of the greatest novels of the 20th century and whose ideas populate hundreds of derivative works of Hollywood. It’s what we will remember him for. By contrast all of his ‘real world’ literature which covered the same topics, couldn’t get published during his lifetime.

The Storyteller’s Apprentice

The alchemy of the fantastic with the mundane is what makes for great storytelling. It’s what made Disney into Disney. It’s what gave Dick’s science-fiction work its heft and power. It’s what makes stories something worth retelling.

Taken to its extreme stories and legends become something larger than individual chapters. In an oral tradition the stories handed down would morph to suit the challenges of the day, their sequels can and would contradict what came before. Continuity wasn’t a thing. It wasn’t important, what was important was the underlying lessons, the underlying truth.

Read any anthology of ancient stories and you’ll see exactly what I’m talking about.

Dick created novels like UBIK and The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch to be purposefully insolvable puzzles of nested realities. They can be seen as examples of modern storytellers submitting to the higher power of stories themselves, knowing that the puzzles they present bring people back to them over and over.

And guess what? You get exposed, again and again, to the deeper message, the deeper meaning. It’s what happened to me. I used to re-read UBIK every June 5th, the day the novel opens, because the book is that important to me.

It’s why we watch beloved movies multiple times. You may have come for the superheroes or the lightsabers but you come back for the story.

The point being is that stories which last have resonance and speak truth. Some become so big they grow beyond their origins into something that cannot be untangled. They become myth, legend. When the stories in the Bible or the Norse myths were being passed down through the ages, there wasn’t any care about continuity, only imparting lessons to the next generation who heard them.

Jordan Peterson has made the point that it is actually the lack of continuity, the lack of logic, that makes Creation Myths capable of sustaining a culture and a society from falling into chaos and civil war. He frequently uses the example of the Egyptian stories of Osiris, Set and Horus as the big example, which sustained ancient Egypt, apparently, for thousands of years.

Even Christianity can’t claim that…yet.

This is the responsibility Disney took on when it acquired first Pixar Studios, then Marvel Studios and then, most importantly, Lucasfilm. It already owned ESPN and ABC. It was now a story generating conglomerate so large that it owned all the modern mythmaking franchises sans DC Comics.

And with its overtly dipping its wick into the obvious political fray over Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law it betrayed that responsibility as a repository and generator of new stories capable of becoming myth to its core.

Disney, who used to stand apart from Hollywood’s descent into depravity and violence, became the ultimate symbol of it overnight.

The War Over the Stars

Star Wars I would argue, is one example of a modern story which is looked on by many today with that same kind of reverence. Star Wars’ inherent weirdness is what makes it so very accessible. The comic mythologies of Marvel and, in particular, DC have these same echoes.

Both have been subverted to serve the ‘Woke’ agenda of the World Economic Forum and their Great Reset of all things human into all things Transhuman, which I’ve discussed at length in the past.

It’s also why I think Zack Snyder’s Justice League {ZSJL} was a major turning point in the culture war, because the fans overrode the studio, exposing their betrayal of good storytelling for personal political gain. They butchered ZSJL and its predecessor on purpose to kill the franchise and create something both incomprehensible (Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice) and hollow (2017’s Justice League)

That’s how much Warner Bros. executives hate Zack Synder and the basic message of his DCEU films:

Chaos is bad, men need to be strong, and unite against madmen who are irredeemable.

Management are furious by the runaway success {of ZSJL}, across the globe…This movie touched a deep nerve with a lot of people, especially in China (330 million views in the first 7 days), and whose release, in and of itself, feels like an inflection point.

Snyder’s DC films aren’t woke, they are archetypal. The more this story about how Warner Bros’ execs screwing Snyder over gets out, the worse it looks for them and the more momentum the fans have to get stories they want, not the stories the powers want to give them.

… or the stories the powers think we need, which is the fine line between propaganda and art.

With Warner Brothers Discovery now a reality, everything DC in the pipeline is being retooled and all attempts to leave poison pills behind with billions of dollars tied up in bad projects blocked by new CEO David Zaslav, it’s looking like my call about ZSJL being an inflection point in the culture war was prophetic.

Disney hasn’t yet cleaned house and possibly never will.

I stopped referring to Star Wars as a fairy tale years ago, recognizing that it has risen for some to the level of Creation Myth. The bitter divide over the Original Trilogy vs. the Sequel Trilogy is a kind of incel version of the Old Testament/New Testament divide.

It’s not that Star Wars is a good replacement for these far older, richer stories. It is that Star Wars has become that replacement for too many in our world today. As such, we have to recognize the angst surrounding it is real, even if the reality in which that angst was generated is a false one.

They are in need of something more.

This is why The Mandalorian was such a hit with all Star Wars fans. It restored some faith.

Again from last year’s article on this subject:

With two good guys who have deep storytelling chops now effectively running Lucasfilm, Dave Filoni and John Favreau, Star Wars will regain ‘the high ground’ in the culture war over the next decade.

Now, today I’m not as sure of this statement as I was then, because Disney’s leadership has shown itself to be so thoroughly compromised.

But if Star Wars comes back in full it will be despite the internal war within Disney and Lucasfilm. They will have to respond in part because of the competition on the horizon from Warner Discovery and also because burning Disney to the ground will leave it vulnerable to the same forces which led Elon Musk to buy Twitter.

The Way Forward

Embedded to the core of Star Wars is this idea of the power of stories to sustain culture. The mythology of the Jedi’s impartiality helped sustain the Old Republic for “a thousand generations,” even as they became hidebound and dogmatic.

George Lucas built Star Wars on this idea, a mythology for a culture losing touch with its old traditions. Early returns are that he was successful. Star Wars will have to last a hundred years as a playground for storytellers to acquire even a smidgen of that power.

Canonically, the collapse of the Jedi and the cynicism of Luke Skywalker as expressed in The Last Jedi is what spurred Favreau and Filoni to create The Mandalorian and heal the divide in the fanbase.

Mando’s story is the opposite of Luke’s: A bad man driven by faith in an ancient creed to protect the innocent Grogu (Baby Yoda). That faith leads him to self-sacrifice but also challenging the creed’s self-negation to plant the seeds of spiritual rebirth in the post-Empire chaos through which hope springs in all of us.

The creed he follows is even older than The Republic, a story of the historical conflicts between Mandalorians and Jedi going back 10,000 years. Those stories have sustained the most faithful even through racial purges, deadly civil wars, and the Empire’s turning Mandalore to a post-apocalyptic wasteland.

It is truly powerful stuff, of the type new myths are born from. Mando’s story will be finding a new relationship with his creed that restores Mandalore, just like Luke did with the Jedi creed.

“This is the way,” has joined “May the Force be with you,” as the rallying cry of a generation of people inspired by a story. To bear the burden of rebuilding a fallen world takes both fortitude and faith, hope and strength.

And it shows you just how far Disney has fallen as a company that it succumbed to madness about race, sex and parental rights in service of false realities rather than seek the truth inherent in its own stories.

The way out of the crisis is through it.

*  *  *

Join my Patreon if you want to get real.

BTC: 3GSkAe8PhENyMWQb7orjtnJK9VX8mMf7Zf
BCH: qq9pvwq26d8fjfk0f6k5mmnn09vzkmeh3sffxd6ryt
DCR: DsV2x4kJ4gWCPSpHmS4czbLz2fJNqms78oE
LTC: MWWdCHbMmn1yuyMSZX55ENJnQo8DXCFg5k
DASH: XjWQKXJuxYzaNV6WMC4zhuQ43uBw8mN4Va
ETH: 0x1dd2e6cddb02e3839700b33e9dd45859344c9edc
DGB: SXygreEdaAWESbgW6mG15dgfH6qVUE5FSE
ARRR: zs132w864erce9x8lmcmlnv8vw05p646kp0uxy29q82ak4n9504at0sut3eu3kmscn5yqhtje2yjyv

Tyler Durden
Wed, 04/27/2022 – 18:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Zmj0B16 Tyler Durden