Russia Insists Venezuelan Scenario Will Not Happen In Cuba: ‘No Easy Ride’

Russia Insists Venezuelan Scenario Will Not Happen In Cuba: ‘No Easy Ride’

Russian Ambassador to the UN Vassily Nebenzia vowed on Friday that there will be no repeat of the Venezuelan scenario in Cuba.

“There has undoubtedly been betrayal in Venezuela, this is being said quite openly. Some high-ranking officials have, in fact, betrayed the president. This scenario will not work in Cuba. I think that the Americans, despite the rhetoric they have been using against Cuba lately, are still just rhetoric. Because there will be no easy ride in Cuba if they want to repeat something like what happened in Venezuela,” Nebenzia told a Russian TV channel.

The statements come a day following Trump signing a new executive order declaring a national emergency related to Cuba and creating a new tariff mechanism targeting countries that supply oil to the island-nation. Already Cuba’s vital flow of Venezuela oil has been cut off by US order.

Illustrative: Polish S-125 air defense system mounted on a T-55 chassis. Belarus has recently modernized Soviet-designed S-125 surface-to-air missile systems for Cuba. Sourcre: Texty.org.ua

Cuba “will be failing pretty soon,” President Trump told reporters Tuesday during a visit to Iowa. “They got their oil from Venezuela. They’re not getting that anymore.”

But it’s true that Cuba has had much more preparation in terms of being in Washington’s crosshairs, given the lengthy history of behind-the-scenes intelligence subterfuge stretching far back into the Cold War.

China has also newly called out the US over its threats against Cuba, with the Chinese Foreign Ministry on Friday stating, “China stands firmly against inhumane practices and moves that deprive the Cuban people of their rights to subsistence and development.”

As for Russian Ambassador Nebenzia, he is also warning that any potential US action against Iran will be no walk in the park and will have massive consequences, describing that Tehran is actually now better prepared for this than in June 2025.

“The rhetoric of President [of United States Donald] Trump [about Iran] seems to have subsided after the protests that took place in Iran. However, the situation is alarming. A strike may take place, but this time Iran is better prepared, I think, for such a turn of events than it was ready for this in June,” Nebenzia said.

And on NATO, he said it has “really exhausted itself, we have been talking about this for a long time. President Trump simply fixed this fact in its essence. Although, of course, NATO as an organization is not going anywhere in the near future, but the concept of Euro-Atlantic security has failed.”

Russia was among a tiny few of the globe’s powers, alongside China, which had good relations – including military links – with Venezuela. The same is true of Cuba and especially of Iran. However, Russia is unlikely at this point to step directly into any potential US-Iran war, given it is bogged down in Ukraine.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/30/2026 – 16:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/MroY3wa Tyler Durden

Democrats Have Become The “Useful Idiots” Of Globalist/Marxist Forces Bent On Destroying Western Civ

Democrats Have Become The “Useful Idiots” Of Globalist/Marxist Forces Bent On Destroying Western Civ

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

It has come into focus now and you no longer need to be perplexed, mystified, bewildered, or bamboozled by events unspooling in Minneapolis and other hotspots of Woke-Marxist-Jacobin delirium. You are seeing the infernal machine of a sponsored revolution. Its parts are visible. They can be named and clearly understood. I will tell you how this works.

The Infernal Machine

You realize, of course, that there has been an ongoing effort by players outside the USA to destroy Western Civ. This is too obvious to be denied. It is coming from several different places. First, China, because China has sprung from a sink of immiseration to become an industrial behemoth in a mere forty years and sees itself as the next global hegemon. Neville Roy Singham, the wealthy American ex-pat living in Shanghai, exposed all over the Internet this past week, is fronting for the CCP with his web of NGOs that just now underwrite the Lefty-left rage-riots around our country, surely subsidized with extra money from his China handlers.

China sent countless thousands of its soldiers surreptitiously across the border during the “Joe Biden” years along with the UN’s millions-footed riffraff. They have yet to be activated, shall we say, in whatever mischief China has planned. That’s on top of all the college students China has seeded all over the US, and the babies hatched here, given US passports, and withdrawn back to China. It’s simple: they want North America and they have a long game-plan to get it. Resources. Food.

Then there’s the Globalist cabal made up of the WEF megalomaniacs, the buffoonish but sinister EU bureaucracy, and — surprise — the sticky residue of the British Empire’s managerial class, believe it or not. This cabal is George & Alex Soros’s platform for their Open Society and Atlantic Council shenanigans and all the NGOs they spawn. Altogether, the WEF-Globalist’s mojo is fading fast since Mr. Trump went to Davos this month and tossed a few grenades into the audience. Plus, of course, Germany, France, and the UK are going dark, both energy-wise and demographically. Doesn’t help.

Then there is less-well-known São Paulo Forum, founded in 1990 by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil’s president today, back then a mere activist, and the late Fidel Castro. This outfit lurked in the deep background until recently when Mr. Trump plucked one of its components off the game-board: Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela. The São Paulo Forum created the permission structure for the Western Hemisphere’s drug and trafficking cartels to thrive in. Both enterprises do immense harm to the USA, first with fentanyl deaths and then with all the second-order effects of illegal immigration — especially of criminals and the insane. It’s all too obvious to belabor.

Who is not in the Destroy Western Civ mix? Another surprise: Russia — apart from the usual boilerplate security apparatus that any major nation must maintain. In case you missed it, Russia is no longer communist. Didn’t work out for them. No, this will probably shock you, but Russia is actually doing what it can to preserve Western Civ, including Christianity, literature, music, philosophy, and domestic civility. They’re in Ukraine because of “Joe Biden.” Here is not the place to adumbrate that topic, so I will leave it for now.

Okay, those are the players outside the USA fomenting revolution among us. The picture, though, is woefully incomplete without America’s Democratic Party, which activates and amplifies the dynamic inside the USA. The Democrats are hostages of the outside forces, but they are not innocent hostages. They are hostage also to their own demonic greed — for power and riches. The Democratic Party has engineered itself into a colossal racketeering operation, a criminal organization, a mafia.

This is now seen garishly in Minnesota, where immigrants — both illegal and strategically placed earlier by Obama & Company — are lately revealed to run a fabulous matrix of fraud around various social services, extracting billions from US taxpayers in the process. This is accomplished with fake companies and NGOs which distribute the loot between the immigrant grifters, the politicians such as Governor Tim Walz, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, and finally the Democratic Party apparatus itself, to keep operations going. The mechanism is being studied in the US Department of Justice.

The Ideological Distribution

Mass illegal immigration serves two clear purposes for the party. They use it to boost census numbers so they can create more congressional districts and takeover existing ones. Also, the illegals are marshaled to provide votes for the party, one way or another. The millions let in under “Joe Biden” received lavish gifts on entry (courtesy of you) to cement their allegiance to the party. And that’s why the Democratic Party will do just about anything to prevent the deportation of their pet illegal immigrants. Also why the Dems have no interest in election reform.

And it is exactly why they have ignited an hysteria among the Democratic Party rank-and-file and sent them out into the streets to create chaos and become martyrs. Now, curiously, the women of the Democratic Party were pre-disposed for this madness by a half century of feminism which has managed to evolve — as JD Haltigan describes so well — into a florid Cluster-B group personality derangement. (Psychologist Gad Saad calls it “suicidal empathy.”) To put it bluntly, their desperate yearning to agree with each other and their maternal instincts to care for anything deemed needy (a baby, the homeless, any victim of something), these hard-wired states-of-mind have been hijacked to now send them into a rage delirium on the frozen streets of Minneapolis (and elsewhere). All that emotional distress is wrapped in a thin tissue of Marxist bullshit to make it appear political, but it’s all ragged emotion. Sometimes in history populations go crazy.

And so, American women — and not a few mentally feminized men — have become the foot-soldiers of the Democratic Party in its increasingly desperate campaign to keep its criminal rackets going — or, at least, not end up in prison over them — while the party has become the collective “useful idiot” of the Globalist / Marxist forces seeking to destroy Western Civ and hand North America over to China.

It’s reasonable to suppose that President Trump and his people understand how this works and aim to do what they can to disassemble the infernal machine behind it. They are going after the money supply lines, the many NGOs involved, and very probably a whole lot of politicians in on the grift. The winter uproar in Minneapolis that cost the lives of two feckless insurgents exposed the machinery of sedition. The Insurrection Act might have been in the president’s back pocket, but he knew it would be foolish to use it. The Dems might be a little concerned about what comes next. Hint: DNI Tulsi Gabbard showing up yesterday with the FBI at the Fulton County, GA, election storage warehouse to collect 700 boxes of documents and ballots.

One final angle on all this. There’s another player in the mix, and it’s really hard to tell exactly where they stand: that’s the so-called Deep State generally and its main handyman, the CIA, in particular. They have been behind all the “color revolution” action abroad for decades, and perhaps the election fraud in the USA. They appear to have been operating to some degree in Venezuela through all the years of Hugo Chavez and Maduro, with some nefarious involvement in the cartels. And no question they were behind the long-running coup in all its parts to defame, oust, jail, impoverish, defeat, and kill Mr. Trump since 2016. Their pals in the adjacent DC Lawfare industry are trying really hard to subvert and pervert the judicial system. CIA Director John Ratcliffe has some ‘splainin’ to do about what he managed to accomplish this year, cleaning up the agency. Or not.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/30/2026 – 16:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Y4gOIV Tyler Durden

“Justice Is Coming”: Border Czar Homan Vows Reckoning For Anti-ICE Groups

“Justice Is Coming”: Border Czar Homan Vows Reckoning For Anti-ICE Groups

Border czar Tom Homan said Thursday that far-left groups accused of funding and organizing attacks on Immigration and Customs Enforcement will be held responsible.

“About the organization and the funding of the attacks on ICE, I’m not going to answer a lot about that because I’m not going to show our hand, but they’ll be held accountable. Justice is coming,” Homan said at a Minneapolis press conference.

He also criticized the heated rhetoric aimed at ICE officers nationwide, urging people to ease tensions, according to the NY Post.

“I begged for the last two months on TV for the rhetoric to stop. I said in March — if the rhetoric doesn’t stop, there is gonna be bloodshed. And there has been. I wish I wasn’t right. I don’t want to see anybody die,” he said.

Homan explained that reduced hostility could allow federal authorities to scale back their presence in Minneapolis. He said discussions with Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison have already led to plans for a partial drawdown.

“Based on the discussions I’ve had with the governor and the AG, we can start drawing down those resources,” Homan said, adding that agents could focus on criminals “in a jail with much less people.”

“So the drawdown is going to happen based on these agreements, but the drawdown could happen even more if the hateful rhetoric and impediments stop.”

Homan said any reduction will depend on cooperation from local officials and warned that agents could be redeployed if support declines. About 3,000 federal officers are currently stationed in Minneapolis, far outnumbering local police.

The NY Post writes that he said federal authorities have made progress and will remain in the city “until the problem’s gone.”

Addressing criticism from city leaders, Homan said local officials are not being asked to enforce immigration law.

“To be clear, we did not agree with Minnesota’s state and local officials that they would be involved in immigration enforcement,” he said. “I’m asking them to be cops working with the cops to help us take criminal aliens off the street.”

Under the revised strategy, Homan said ICE will focus more narrowly on criminal offenders while continuing overall enforcement.

“If you’re in the country illegally, you’re never off the table,” he said. “We are not surrendering our mission at all. We are just doing it smarter.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/30/2026 – 15:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/v9JaElm Tyler Durden

Trump Targets Canadian Aircraft With Decertification Threat, 50% Tariff Warning

Trump Targets Canadian Aircraft With Decertification Threat, 50% Tariff Warning

President Trump on Thursday threatened to “decertify” Canadian-made aircraft and slap a 50% tariff on planes sold into the United States, in a potential move that would mark an unprecedented intervention in aviation regulation, given this function is traditionally handled by the Federal Aviation Administration (however, the FAA has yet to issue comment).

In a Truth Social post, Trump linked the threat to Canada’s refusal to certify several Gulfstream business jet models, amid broader growing tensions related to him calling the country America’s “51st state”. 

We are hereby decertifying their Bombardier Global Expresses, and all Aircraft made in Canada,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, warning that if the dispute is not “immediately corrected,” Washington would impose a “50% Tariff on any and all Aircraft sold into the United States of America.

But again, the reality remains that no US president has ever directly “decertified” commercial aircraft, but it signifies a further breakdown in Washington-Ottawa relations. The full Trump statement is below:

The same day that Trump made the threat, Prime Minister Mark Carney called for the US to respect Canadian sovereignty, following widespread reports that Alberta separatists had met Trump administration on multiple occasions over the last nine months.

The group, Alberta Prosperity Project (APP), does have a significant following and number of members. They are asking Washington to provide political and monetary support for an “independent” Alberta.

Carney hit back, saying he expects “the US administration to respect Canadian sovereignty – I’m always clear with President Trump to that effect”.

At the same time, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she expected American officials to allow discussions about the province’s “democratic process” to remain internal, among Albertans and Canadians. The US shouldn’t meddle, she’s made clear.

But US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently signaled at Davos: “Alberta is a natural partner for the US. People are talking. People want sovereignty. They want what the US has got.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/30/2026 – 15:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/6YsfJDX Tyler Durden

Watch: Jennings Destroys Dems For Refusing To Condemn DA’s Vow To “Hunt Down Nazi” ICE Agents

Watch: Jennings Destroys Dems For Refusing To Condemn DA’s Vow To “Hunt Down Nazi” ICE Agents

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

CNN contributor Scott Jennings unloaded on Democrats during a heated panel discussion, exposing their failure to denounce Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s inflammatory threats against federal ICE agents enforcing immigration laws.

Jennings highlighted how such rhetoric from left-wing officials undermines law enforcement and fuels division, especially as the Trump administration ramps up deportations of criminal illegal immigrants.

“Yeah, this is highly inappropriate. No prosecutor in America should be doing that, let alone yelling at and about law enforcement officers,” Jennings urged.

He laid out the core issue plainly: “Look, this debate, a lot of words and a lot of talking around it. We have existing federal immigration law. We have law enforcement agencies, duly sworn officers that have been ordered by the president to go out and enforce those laws. That’s really all the debate is about here.”

Jennings pointed to successful enforcement elsewhere: “And in most jurisdictions, these laws are being enforced quite amicably. There are no incidents. Transfers are happening.”

“People are being deported that have a reason to be deported. It’s just in this specific jurisdiction, people have decided that federal immigration law shouldn’t apply!” he added.

He then escalated his critique to the broader pattern among Democrats: “And now you have sort of radical Democrats around the country ramping this up even further by claiming that they’re going to ‘hunt down’ federal law enforcement officers as though they were Nazis.”

Jennings called out Rep. Eric Swalwell specifically: “You have Eric Swalwell in California promising a reign of terror if he becomes governor against anybody who’s ever worked for ICE!”

“I mean, this kind of division and this kind of threat against people who basically signed up to enforce the law and do public service, it’s outrageous. And any Democrat ought to be able to sit here and say this is way over the line!” Jennings concluded.

The outburst came in response to Krasner’s recent vows during a City Hall event in Philadelphia, where he joined city councilmembers to unveil the “ICE OUT” legislation package. 

The bills aim to bar ICE agents from city-owned property, restrict agency cooperation and data sharing, and limit access to public facilities like libraries, shelters, and health centers without a judicial warrant.

Krasner labeled ICE agents as “a small bunch of wannabe Nazis” and threatened, “If we have to hunt you down the way they hunted down Nazis for decades, we will find your identities. We will find you. We will achieve justice.”

Backlash has been swift. Pennsylvania State Sen. Jarrett Coleman dismissed the comments as “empty threats,” emphasizing that local officials cannot interfere with federal law enforcement. 

House Minority Leader Jesse Topper called them “not just hypocritical [but] outright laughable,” urging focus on community security instead. 

The White House noted a 1,300% surge in assaults on ICE officers, blaming “dangerous, untrue smears by elected Democrats” and praising agents for “act[ing] heroically to enforce the law and protect American communities.”

This rhetoric from Krasner fits into a larger pattern of incitement from Democrat-led cities against federal immigration enforcement. 

As we highlighted earlier, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson admitted to coordinating with other Democrat mayors, including Minneapolis’ Jacob Frey and Boston’s Michelle Wu, to impede ICE operations. 

Johnson has even established “ICE-Free Zones” prohibiting agents from city properties without warrants and is pushing measures to hold them accountable for alleged misconduct.

Tucker Carlson accused Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Mayor Frey of deliberately fueling chaos to spark a “color revolution” and civil war by refusing to protect citizens and allowing riots. 

Carlson warned that such actions lead to states rejecting federal authority, resulting in “warring nations within the same borders” and “killing at scale.”

These escalating threats from radical Democrats not only endanger federal agents doing their jobs but also erode the rule of law that protects American communities from criminal elements. 

With polls showing a majority of Americans supporting mass deportations, this resistance looks increasingly out of touch and dangerous. 

Enforcing immigration laws isn’t optional—it’s essential to putting America First and restoring order after years of open-border chaos.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/30/2026 – 14:17

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/8m5NglS Tyler Durden

Tesla Shares Jump 5% After Musk Reportedly Mulls Merging SpaceX, xAI, Tesla Merger

Tesla Shares Jump 5% After Musk Reportedly Mulls Merging SpaceX, xAI, Tesla Merger

Tesla shares jumped about 5% on Friday after reports suggested that Elon Musk is considering bringing his companies closer together through a possible merger involving SpaceX, Tesla, and artificial intelligence startup xAI. The news helped reverse losses from the previous session, when the stock slid following the company’s earnings report.

According to people familiar with the discussions, SpaceX has been evaluating different ways to combine parts of Musk’s business portfolio ahead of a potential public offering. One option involves a tie-up with Tesla, while another centers on xAI. These talks are still preliminary, and no agreement has been reached, but investors welcomed the possibility of deeper cooperation across the group.

The market reaction was swift. After falling to its lowest level in two months on Thursday, Tesla rebounded strongly in early Friday trading. The rally lifted the company’s valuation back toward $1.65 trillion, signaling renewed confidence in Musk’s long-term strategy despite recent financial pressures.

Much of that optimism reflects the potential overlap between the companies’ ambitions. Musk has repeatedly floated the idea of using SpaceX technology to support large-scale computing in orbit, which could benefit xAI’s push to expand its artificial intelligence systems. Tesla, meanwhile, could contribute through its battery, energy storage, and manufacturing operations, creating a tightly linked ecosystem spanning transportation, robotics, space, and AI.

Financial ties between the firms have already been growing. Tesla recently committed $2 billion to xAI, matching a similar investment made earlier by SpaceX. In a shareholder letter, Tesla said, “As set forth in Master Plan Part IV, Tesla is building products and services that bring AI into the physical world. Meanwhile, xAI is developing leading digital AI products and services, such as its large language model (Grok).”

Musk reinforced that view during the earnings call, arguing that collaboration is central to Tesla’s future. “But if there are things xAI can help accelerate our progress, then why should we not do that?” he said. “And that is the reason why we’ve gone ahead with such an investment. Because this is part of the strategic initiative.” The company has also highlighted links between AI development, its Optimus robots, and autonomous driving systems.

Still, significant uncertainty surrounds any potential deal. People close to the matter say the companies may ultimately decide against merging, and any transaction could complicate SpaceX’s plans for a major stock market debut later this year. That offering, if it moves forward as expected, could be one of the largest in history.

The surge in Tesla’s share price also comes as the company faces near-term challenges. Recent earnings showed weaker profitability, and management has warned that heavy spending is coming as it ramps up investments in autonomy and robotics.

Musk acknowledged the scale of those plans, saying, “This year for Tesla is the first major steps as we increase vehicle autonomy and begin to produce Optimus robots at scale — we’re making very, very big investments.” For now, investors appear to be focused less on short-term risks and more on the possibility that Musk’s interconnected vision could unlock new sources of growth.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/30/2026 – 14:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/a2VlLXm Tyler Durden

Supreme Court to Decide Firearms Ban for Marijuana Users

Currently being briefed before the U.S. Supreme Court on the merits is a test of the federal statutory ban, with severe felony penalties, for any marijuana “user” who possess a firearm or even a single round of ammunition. 18 U.S.C. sec. 922(g)(3). The Supreme Court’s docket page is here. And here is the amicus brief I coauthored on behalf of the National Rifle Association, FPC Action Foundation, and Independence Institute (where I work). The lead author was NRA’s litigation director Joseph Greenlee. As always in a Greenlee brief, the originalist legal history is complete and impeccable.

Below is the Summary of Argument.

“To justify firearms prohibition for marijuana users when they are not intoxicated, the government must prove that the ban is consistent with our nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. That tradition supports restrictions on the use of firearms while intoxicated, but it does not support disarming individuals when they are sober merely because they sometimes use intoxicants.”

“Throughout American history, legislatures recognized that intoxication could temporarily increase the danger of firearms misuse. But they did not respond by entirely disarming people based on their status as users. Instead, historical intoxication laws regulated conduct: restricting the carrying, discharge, or purchase of firearms only while a person was intoxicated and only for as long as that condition lasted. The historical record thus reflects a consistent tradition of narrow, situational restrictions rather than categorical disarmament.”

“Moreover, because the combination of intoxicants and firearms is a problem that has persisted since the eighteenth century, the government must provide a distinctly similar historical regulation addressing it. Hemp and alcohol were both widespread and well known during the Founding Era. Hemp was extensively cultivated, widely discussed, and understood to have intoxicating properties, while alcohol abuse was pervasive and deeply troubling to the Founders themselves. Firearms and intoxicants routinely intersected—in militia service, social gatherings, celebrations, and military campaigns—making their combination a familiar and longstanding societal problem. The historical record shows that legislatures confronted these risks through narrow, conduct-based regulations rather than broad prohibitions on firearm possession.”

“Bereft of relevant support, the government elides the historical tradition of ‘firearm regulation,’ and instead offers strained analogies to civil-commitment laws for alcoholics who could not manage their affairs and to vagrancy laws that detained people in forced labor for loafing, juggling, or wearing the clothes of the opposite sex.

“The government also cites surety laws, but those laws undermine its case because they required an individualized judicial finding of dangerousness.”

“Besides contradicting the specific American historical tradition about regulating firearms and intoxicants, the prosecution of Hemani for marijuana use violates a broader rule: individual disarmament must be based on dangerousness. Yet the government has made no serious effort to establish a connection between marijuana use and dangerousness. Rather than focusing on marijuana, it discusses drugs in the abstract and relies primarily on violent incidents involving methamphetamine, heroin, tranquilizers, quaaludes, and PCP.”

Accordingly, the brief urges that section 922(g)(3) be held unconstitutional as applied to Hemani. The government’s briefing makes all sort of accusations and insinuations about him, but the only crime with which he has been charged is possessing firearms and also being a marijuana user.

The post Supreme Court to Decide Firearms Ban for Marijuana Users appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/ZqYV9vP
via IFTTT

The Minneapolis Shootings Underline the Advantages of Body Cameras, Which DHS Has Been Slow To Adopt


an ICE agent in Minneapolis | Dave Decker/Zuma Press/Newscom

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is reviewing body camera footage of the encounter that culminated in Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti’s death on Saturday. That footage could help clarify the circumstances in which a Border Patrol agent and a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer fatally shot Pretti.

When Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross killed Minneapolis protester Renee Good on January 7, by contrast, he used his cellphone rather than a body camera to record the encounter. Although Vice President J.D. Vance claimed the resulting video confirmed that Ross shot Good in self-defense, it does not actually show what was happening when Ross fired his gun. It is not clear whether other ICE agents at the scene were wearing body cameras, but it seems unlikely, since the local ICE office does not have any.

Both incidents underline the importance of body cameras in resolving questions about the use of force by law enforcement officers. But although body cameras have been widely adopted by state and local law enforcement agencies, their use by DHS personnel is spotty and inconsistent. That could change as a result of negotiations between the Trump administration and Democratic legislators, who are demanding several reforms, including a body camera mandate for all immigration agents, as a condition of approving DHS funding.

So far, the only publicly available video record of the Good and Pretti shootings consists of cellphone footage. In both cases, that evidence discredited the Trump administration’s initial justifications, which portrayed Good and Pretti as would-be murderers. The videos suggest that Good, contrary to what President Donald Trump and other officials said, did not deliberately try to run Ross over with her SUV. And they show that Pretti, who had a carry permit, never drew his pistol or “attacked those officers,” contrary to what DHS Secretary Kristi Noem claimed.

The cellphone videos nevertheless leave several questions unanswered. Some of those questions are legal: Did the officers reasonably believe, given “the totality of the circumstances,” that the use of deadly force was necessary to protect themselves, their colleagues, or the general public? But there are also policy questions: What sort of rules or training would help prevent outcomes like these?

Body camera footage could help answer those questions by providing a more complete record of the events preceding the shootings and by showing what the officers were seeing, hearing, and saying. Consider the account of the Pretti shooting that CBP’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) offered in a report to Congress on Tuesday.

After “CBP personnel attempted to take Pretti into custody,” the OPR report says, “Pretti resisted CBP personnel’s efforts and a struggle ensued. During the struggle, a [Border Patrol agent] yelled, ‘He’s got a gun!’ multiple times. Approximately five seconds later, a [Border Patrol agent] discharged his CBP-issued Glock 19 and a [CBP officer] also discharged his CBP-issued Glock 47 at Pretti. After the shooting, a [Border Patrol agent] advised he had possession of Pretti’s firearm. The [Border Patrol agent] subsequently cleared and secured Pretti’s firearm in his vehicle.”

That account omits some crucial details that are already clear from bystander videos. It does not mention that the Border Patrol agent who “secured Pretti’s firearm” had disarmed him by the time the shooting started or that Pretti was restrained, with both of his arms pinned down, at that point. It does not mention that the agent who first opened fire shot Pretti four times in the back at close range, which suggests he faced no immediate threat. It does not mention that, after Pretti collapsed on the pavement, that agent and the CBP officer fired six more rounds into his prone, motionless body from a distance.

“There is body camera footage from multiple angles which investigators are currently reviewing,” an unnamed DHS official told NPR after the shooting. That evidence could be crucial in illuminating why the Border Control agent opened fire. Exactly what threat did he perceive at that point? Did he ever actually see the gun, and did he realize it had already been removed? Did he understand that Pretti was restrained in a way that would have made it impossible for him to draw the gun even if it was still in its holster?

The final six rounds are even harder to understand, let alone justify. But the body camera footage, including the audio, could help clarify what the Border Patrol agent and the CBP officer were seeing and thinking at that point.

If we had “body camera footage from multiple angles” of the ICE encounter with Good, it could confirm that her car made contact with him as she began to drive away and clarify the seriousness of any injury he suffered. It might show how fast the car was moving and whether Ross was still in its path when he fired the first round, which entered the car through the lower left corner of the windshield. It could clarify his position when he fired the second and third rounds, which entered the car through the side window next to Good. And it might shed light on whether Ross acted out of fear, as Noem has said, or out of anger, as suggested by his “fucking bitch” comment after he killed Good.

In both cases, body camera footage could shed light on why the encounters escalated so quickly. The evidence so far suggests that both situations could have been resolved peacefully if the officers had taken a less aggressive approach. But additional video and audio evidence might clarify why the ICE officer who ordered Good to “get out of the fucking car” decided to forcibly remove her, which was the threat that seems to have motivated her attempted flight. It likewise might clarify why “CBP personnel attempted to take Pretti into custody,” which led to the struggle that ended in lethal gunfire.

The advantages of body cameras, which can both document police abuses and exonerate officers wrongly accused of them, have persuaded state and local law enforcement agencies across the country to adopt them. By 2016, nearly half of “general-purpose law enforcement agencies in the United States,” including 80 percent of large police departments, had begun using body cameras. “As of 2020,” the police technology company Axon reports, “all U.S. police departments serving at least one million residents reported using body cameras, and 79 percent of police officers nationwide reported working in departments with [body camera] programs.” But the federal government has been slow to follow that trend, and DHS in particular has not settled on a uniform policy.

In 2022, President Joe Biden issued an executive order requiring federal law enforcement agencies to implement body camera programs. The following year, the DHS noted that CBP already had provided 7,000 body cameras to its personnel and said ICE likewise would start using them, building on a pilot program that Congress had established in 2021. According to a 2024 DHS report, “full implementation” of body cameras across ICE was expected by last September.

Things did not quite work out that way. On the first day of his second term, Trump rescinded Biden’s body camera order, and his administration has not been keen on expanding use of the devices.

In a January 19 declaration submitted during litigation over the immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, Samuel J. Olson, director of enforcement and removal operations (ERO) at ICE’s field office in St. Paul, said his office “is not scheduled or funded for [body camera] deployment.” He added that ICE personnel working out of that office “are not properly prepared, trained, or equipped for an immediate deployment” of body cameras. To equip all of them, he said, would require about 2,000 cameras, and at that point the office had none.

“If all ICE law enforcement personnel deployed to or operating out of Minnesota were required to use [body cameras], ICE would need approximately 180 days to evaluate and complete the required improvements to the network; ship, install, and test the necessary equipment; and train hundreds of law enforcement personnel on proper usage, maintenance, and storage,” Olson said. “If the number of officers and agents in the ERO St. Paul Office exceeds the number of physical devices currently in the agency’s possession, ICE would need to procure additional devices, the process [for] which must comport with federal law. In such an instance, the minimum estimated 180-day timeline would no longer be feasible.”

CBP officers, by contrast, are supposed to be using body cameras in Minnesota. The CBP, which includes the Border Patrol, says body cameras “will be used to record official law enforcement encounters, except when doing so may jeopardize agents and officers or public safety.” But according to a Border Patrol official in Minneapolis quoted in the same NPR story, that policy applies to “CBP personnel who are equipped with and trained in” body cameras, which suggests use of the devices is less than comprehensive within that agency.

As of last June, The Washington Post reports, “ICE had 4,400 cameras, though its workforce has since swelled to 22,000, while CBP had 13,400 cameras for a workforce of at least 45,000 armed officers.” Depending on what happens with the DHS spending bill that Congress is considering, that situation might improve. Under a Senate deal that Trump endorsed on Thursday, the DHS will be temporarily funded for two weeks, allowing time to negotiate a bill that could include new body camera requirements.

The post The Minneapolis Shootings Underline the Advantages of Body Cameras, Which DHS Has Been Slow To Adopt appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/DH1sWIz
via IFTTT

Virginia Democrats Advance 7 Gun Control Bills, Including a Ban on ‘Assault’ Weapons


Photo of a semiautomatic rifle on an orange background | Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The Second Amendment states, and the Virginia Constitution repeats, that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Someone ought to tell the Virginia state Senate. This week, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee advanced seven bills that shall infringe on one of Americans’ most sacred and important rights. 

Senate Bill (S.B.) 749, introduced by state Sen. Saddam Salim (D–Merrifield), outlaws the importation, sale, and possession of “assault firearms,” which the Virginia Code defines as “any semi-automatic center-fire rifle or pistol…equipped at the time of the offense with a magazine which will hold more than 20 rounds of ammunition or designed by the manufacturer to accommodate a silencer or equipped with a folding stock.” Those who violate this prohibition will be barred from legally owning a firearm for three years and face a Class 1 misdemeanor, which carries a maximum fine of $2,500 and up to one year in jail. 

Salim’s bill also outlaws “large capacity ammunition feeding devices,” which are merely magazines with a capacity of over 10 rounds. Such magazines are very popular: Of the 963 million magazines produced for the commercial market from 1990 to 2021, 717 million held 11 or more rounds, according to a report published by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a firearms trade association. As with possession of an assault firearm, the penalty for owning a magazine that holds 11 or more rounds instead of 10 would be a Class 1 misdemeanor, but without the three-year prohibition on firearm ownership. 

S.B. 272, introduced by state Sen. R. Creigh Deeds (D–Charlottesville), would make it illegal to carry a firearm within “any building owned or leased by the Commonwealth,” as well as the Capitol, and Capitol Square. This is the same square where the Virginia Citizens Defense League gathered nearly 1,000 gun rights activists one week after the bill’s introduction. A violation would result in confiscation of the firearm and a Class 1 misdemeanor. S.B. 312, introduced by state Sen. Adam Ebbin (D–Alexandria), bans Virginians from carrying most firearms, loaded or unloaded, in “any other place of whatever nature that is open to the public,” violations of which are treated as a Class 1 misdemeanor. This is a major departure from the current law, which generally allows lawful gun owners to carry even loaded assault firearms in public, excluding select counties and cities. 

Carrying restrictions could also apply to motorists. 

S.B. 496, introduced by state Sen. David Marsden (D–Burke), makes it a crime to leave a handgun in your car’s trunk unless it is “in a locked hard-sided container…permanently affixed to the vehicle’s interior.” (Locked glove compartments and center consoles would qualify as such containers under the current text of the bill.) This means that if you’re a responsible gun owner who leaves your unloaded pistol in a locked, hard-sided carrying case in a locked trunk, and you step inside a gas station to get a bottle of water for the road, you would be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor (a $250 fine). Meanwhile, S.B. 115, introduced by state Sen. Stella Pekarsky (D–Centreville), would likely reduce Virginia’s reciprocity agreements, which allow people to carry with all out-of-state permits.

Even Virginians who have no interest in carrying their weapon in public are targeted by two bills advanced in the Senate.

S.B. 348, introduced by state Sen. Jennifer Boysko (D–Herndon), makes it a Class 4 misdemeanor for gun owners with children to store their firearms loaded unless they are “stored in a biometric storage device” inaccessible to the minor. S.B. 323, introduced by Ebbin, would outlaw the manufacture and possession of firearms made at home or with a 3D printer that are “not detectable…by the types of detection devices, including X-ray machines, commonly used at airports.” Violating this bill would constitute a Class 5 felony, which typically carries a one- to 10-year prison sentence. The bill would also outlaw the possession of “a firearm or any completed or unfinished frame or receiver that is not imprinted with a valid serial number,” a second infraction of which would be treated as a Class 4 felony: two to 10 years of prison and a fine of up to $100,000.

Virginia has a proud history of liberty, which is codified in its Declaration of Rights, penned by George Mason, and in its official motto, sic semper tyrannis: thus always to tyrants. In light of the restrictive gun bills advanced in the state Senate this week, it may be time for Virginia to update its motto to semper tyrannis: tyrants forever.

The post Democrats Advance 7 Bills Restricting Gun Rights in the Virginia State Senate appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/XOzptio
via IFTTT