NYC Schools Close As COVID-19 Makes “Dangerous Comeback” Across US: Live Updates

NYC Schools Close As COVID-19 Makes “Dangerous Comeback” Across US: Live Updates

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 09:40

Summary:

  • NYC closes schools in ‘hot spots’

  • Horace Mann school also closes amid outbreak

  • US in the grip of “dangerous” COVID-19 comeback

  • Cases continue to rise across US as Midwest drives new wave

  • GSK + VIR say new antibody treatment enters Phase 3

  • Ireland’s cabinet suggests raising alert level

  • China in talks to have WHO ‘assess’ vaccines

  • India reports fewest new cases since Aug. 25

* * *

Schools in ‘hot spots’ across NYC are closing Tuesday – a day earlier than NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio had hoped – as Gov Cuomo, de Blasio’s political arch-rival, makes changes to the mayor’s proposal, which was subject to state approval. De Blasio had wanted to shutter all “non-essential” business, in the first rollback of the city’s summertime reopening efforts, but Gov. Cuomo wisely staid his hand.

Of course, NY isn’t alone, as outbreaks are worsening across the Midwest and other parts of the country, while states like NY and NJ see incipient new outbreaks of their own.

In addition to the public schools in NYC’s hot spots, Horace Mann, a private school in the Bronx, has suspended in-person classes for its middle and upper grades for two weeks after the school was alerted to a mini outbreak among its teaching staff.

But, as Bloomberg points out, South Dakota and North Dakota are seeing some of the worst outbreaks relative to their populations.

While big states like California, Florida and Texas are seeing cases continue to decline, outside of the Sun Belt, the US outbreak is growing.

Scientists in the US have long warned of a looming “Twindemic” as the coronavirus mixes with the common cold and the seasonal flu. And in the Midwest, where falling temperatures are starting to send people indoors, many states are seeing the virus arrive in towns and small communities where it has been almost totally absent. In Nebraska, the seven-day average of cases hit a record Saturday, joining Midwestern and Western states including Wisconsin, Montana and the Dakotas in confronting a virus that had eluded them until recently.

“We’re in very bad shape, never having achieved any sense of containment, never gotten below 20,000 new confirmed cases per day,” said Eric Topol, director of Scripps Research Translational Institute. “Things can only get worse on this course.”

Meanwhile, as Trump’s return to the White House captivated the country on Monday, the NYT reported – as we mentioned last night – that the administration is once again pressuring the FDA to make changes to its proposed new vaccine guidelines to strip out a section that would essentially rule out the approval of a vaccine before election day.

Despite rising case numbers, Texas Gov Greg Abbott is reportedly preparing to announce another round of rollbacks for the state’s COVID-19-related restrictions.

Finally, on the pharmaceutical side, GlaxoSmithKline and VIR have announced that their antibody therapy, which is similar to convalescent plasma and other techniques seeking a ‘cure’ for COVID-19.

Here’s more COVID-19 news from last night and this morning:

Global cases reach 35,485,738. The worldwide death toll has hit 1,044,085 (Source: JHU)

US COVID cases +39,562 (prev. +35,504) and deaths +460 (prev. +690). New York COVID cases +933 (prev. +1,222) and deaths +8 (prev. +14). (Source: Newswires).

Biontech and Pfizer have initiated a rolling submission to the European Medicines Agency for COVID-19 vaccine candidate as the EU scrambles to approve the leading vaccine projects, which also includes AstraZeneca and Oxford (which has also struck a deal for rolling submission of trial data) (Source: AFP).

France COVID cases +5,084 (prev. +12,565) and deaths +69 (prev. +32). (Source: AFP).

Ireland’s Cabinet recommended to raise the country’s alert level to 3, from, at midnight Tuesday (Source: RTE).

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani reportedly may have contracted COVID-19 (Source: FARS).

China is in talks to have its locally produced COVID-19 vaccines assessed by the World Health Organization, as a step toward making them available for international use, a WHO official says. Hundreds of thousands of essential workers and other groups considered at high risk in China have been given locally developed vaccines even though clinical trials had not been completed, raising safety concerns (Source: Nikkei).

India’s latest daily new case count was just 61,267, fewer than the 74,442 a day earlier and the lowest single-day tally since Aug. 25. India has seen a total of 6.69 million. Deaths rose by 884 to 103,569 (Source: Nikkei).

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3iAjeZr Tyler Durden

Trump Is Losing Old People to Biden in Battleground States

maphotoseight596623

A new poll shows President Donald Trump trailing Democratic nominee Joe Biden by 30 points among older voters in Michigan. If the trend holds in other battleground statesand recent numbers suggest it mightthen the Trump 2020 reelection campaign is in deep trouble. Americans aged 65 and older reliably show up to vote in larger numbers than their younger counterparts and tend to vote more conservatively.

“A Democratic candidate has not won voters over the age of 65 in two decades, and in 2016 Trump beat Clinton in that group by 8 points,” points out Forbes. “In 2012, Mitt Romney won seniors by 12 points over Obama (56%-44%), and John McCain edged out Obama by 8 points in 2008 (53%-45%), according to exit polls.”

Back in early September, Michigan residents 65 and up only marginally preferred Biden, with the former vice president and 2020 Democratic candidate beating Trump by 7.5 percent among this group (with a 4-point margin of error).

But a new WDIV/Detroit News poll conducted between September 30 and October 3 found that Trump has lost 22 points with older voters since then. In the latest poll, 59.1 percent of older Michigan voters supported Biden, while just 29.2 percent supported Trump.

“This is a five-alarm fire for the president’s campaign, if true,” tweeted NBC News’ Sahil Kapur.

Older Michigan voterswho overwhelmingly say they plan to vote by mail this yearpreferred Biden regardless of gender, with Biden making especially big gains among older white men. “White men over 65 have shifted by 22.1% since early September with Biden now holding an 8.8% lead,” notes Detroit’s WDIV Local 4 News. “White women over 65 have shifted by 17.6% with Biden now holding a 15.4% lead.”

Trump still leads among white Michigan voters in the 50 to 64 age cohort but appears to be losing ground with that group, too. In the WDIV/Detroit News poll conducted between September 1-3, more than half (51.8 percent) preferred Trump while just 42.2 percent preferred Biden. But in the latest Michigan polling, Biden and Trump were tied at 46 percent among those ages 50-64.

And older voters’ turn away from Trump isn’t merely a Michigan phenomenon. Recent polling in other toss-up states, including Florida and Pennsylvania, found similar shifts.

Older Voters in Florida, Pennsylvania, and Arizona Like Biden

An AARP poll of Floridians found that voters ages 50 and above “are not a lock for either major-party presidential candidate,” with 50 percent going toward Trump to Biden’s 47 percent in a poll (with a 2.2-point margin of error) that was conducted August 30-September 8. Among voters ages 65 and older, however, Trump trailed Biden by just one percentage point.

In the latest New York Times-Siena College Research Institute poll of Pennsylvanians, 53 percent of the oldest voters preferred Biden and 42 percent preferred Trump.

In the group’s poll of Floridians, voters 65 and older were fairly evenly split between the Republican and Democratic candidates, with 47 percent supporting Biden and 45 percent supporting Trump. (Both the Florida and Pennsylvania polls had roughly 4-point margins of error.)

The latest poll of Arizona voters from The New York Times and Siena College Research Institute, conducted October 1-3, found Biden and Trump are extremely close among older voters there, too: 48 percent of those ages 65 and older said they would vote for Biden and 47 percent said they would vote for Trump.

Jorgensen Garners Interest From Millennials and Generation Z

In Arizona, 3 percent of all likely voters surveyed said they support Jo Jorgensen. The Libertarian Party (L.P.) presidential candidate drew the most support in Arizona from young voters, with 8 percent support among the 18- to 29-year-old crowd polled and only 1 percent support from voters 65 and older.

Jorgensen was also the top candidate for 3 percent of survey respondents in the Pennsylvania poll, and top choice for 2 percent in Florida. As in Arizona, Jorgensen attracted support from millennial and Gen Z voters in both states.

While just 1 percent of the oldest cohort in Florida supported Jorgensen, 6 percent of the 30- to 44-year-olds and 4 percent of the 18- to 29-year-olds polled did. (Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins was supported by 2 percent of each younger group in the Sunshine State.) In Pennsylvania, 6 percent each of the youngest and second-youngest groups supported Jorgensen, with her support dwindling to 3 percent among 45- to 64-year-olds and zero percent among the oldest group.

So, older voters aren’t fleeing Trump for the L.P. this year; slack seems to be picked up solely by Biden and Democrats.

If older voters prefer Biden in November, it will be a big deal. Remember, voters 65 and above “have gone for Republican presidential candidates since 2004” and “favored Trump over Hillary Clinton by a 52 to 45 percent margin,” as Robert Griffin, research director of the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group, points out.

He also notes that older voters are more likely to describe Biden than Trump as moderate—which could help explain Biden’s good showing among older Americans. They’re not swinging leftward, it could just be that Trump is a chaos agent and Biden is as status quo as they come.


FREE MINDS

In other Supreme Court news: justices ruled yesterday (with no dissents) to allow South Carolina Republicans “to reinstate the state’s witness-signature requirement on absentee ballots pending appeal.” More here.


FREE MARKETS


QUICK HITS

  • John McAfee is being charged with tax evasion by the Department of Justice. McAfee has been accused of earning “millions in income from promoting cryptocurrencies, consulting work, speaking engagements, and selling the rights to his life story for a documentary” but not filing any federal tax returns between 2014 and 2018.
  • “President Donald Trump has been touting chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine since March as effective treatments for COVID-19,” writes Ron Bailey. But “last week, when the president was hospitalized for a COVID-19 infection, his physicians listed the medications with which he is being treated” and “hydroxychloroquine is notable by its absence.”
  • “Nearly a third of hospitalized COVID-19 patients experienced some type of altered mental function—ranging from confusion to delirium to unresponsiveness” in a large new study published Monday in the Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. For the study, researchers looked at the first 509 people hospitalized with COVID-19 in the Chicago area.
  • Almost, you guys:

  • Sigh: “The chairman of the Senate committee that oversees airlines and U.S. transportation policy had his mask off for extended periods on a Delta flight to Mississippi on Thursday night, according to another passenger, and the company said he had to be reminded twice by a flight attendant to follow the airline’s mask requirement.”

Myles Cosgrove, a Louisville, Kentucky, detective who participated in the fruitless and legally dubious drug raid that killed Breonna Taylor last March, told investigators the incident unfolded so quickly that he was not consciously aware of using his gun. That detail, which emerged from audio recordings of grand jury proceedings that were released on Friday, is alarming in light of the fact that Cosgrove fired 16 rounds—including the fatal bullet, according to the FBI’s ballistic analysis.

  • In California, a day of activism around prisoners’ rights:

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3lvv3Cb
via IFTTT

Trump Is Losing Old People to Biden in Battleground States

maphotoseight596623

A new poll shows President Donald Trump trailing Democratic nominee Joe Biden by 30 points among older voters in Michigan. If the trend holds in other battleground statesand recent numbers suggest it mightthen the Trump 2020 reelection campaign is in deep trouble. Americans aged 65 and older reliably show up to vote in larger numbers than their younger counterparts and tend to vote more conservatively.

“A Democratic candidate has not won voters over the age of 65 in two decades, and in 2016 Trump beat Clinton in that group by 8 points,” points out Forbes. “In 2012, Mitt Romney won seniors by 12 points over Obama (56%-44%), and John McCain edged out Obama by 8 points in 2008 (53%-45%), according to exit polls.”

Back in early September, Michigan residents 65 and up only marginally preferred Biden, with the former vice president and 2020 Democratic candidate beating Trump by 7.5 percent among this group (with a 4-point margin of error).

But a new WDIV/Detroit News poll conducted between September 30 and October 3 found that Trump has lost 22 points with older voters since then. In the latest poll, 59.1 percent of older Michigan voters supported Biden, while just 29.2 percent supported Trump.

“This is a five-alarm fire for the president’s campaign, if true,” tweeted NBC News’ Sahil Kapur.

Older Michigan voterswho overwhelmingly say they plan to vote by mail this yearpreferred Biden regardless of gender, with Biden making especially big gains among older white men. “White men over 65 have shifted by 22.1% since early September with Biden now holding an 8.8% lead,” notes Detroit’s WDIV Local 4 News. “White women over 65 have shifted by 17.6% with Biden now holding a 15.4% lead.”

Trump still leads among white Michigan voters ages 50 to 64 but appears to be losing ground with that group, too. In the WDIV/Detroit News poll conducted between September 1–3, more than half (51.8 percent) preferred Trump while just 42.2 percent preferred Biden. But in the latest Michigan polling, Biden and Trump were tied at 46 percent among those ages 50-64.

And older voters’ turn away from Trump isn’t merely a Michigan phenomenon. Recent polling in other toss-up states, including Florida and Pennsylvania, found similar shifts.

Older Voters in Florida, Pennsylvania, and Arizona Like Biden

An AARP poll of Floridians found that voters ages 50 and above “are not a lock for either major-party presidential candidate,” with 50 percent going toward Trump to Biden’s 47 percent in a poll (with a 2.2-point margin of error) that was conducted August 30–September 8. Among voters ages 65 and older, however, Trump trailed Biden by just one percentage point.

In the latest New York Times-Siena College Research Institute poll of Pennsylvanians, 53 percent of the oldest voters preferred Biden and 42 percent preferred Trump.

In the group’s poll of Floridians, voters 65 and older were fairly evenly split between the Republican and Democratic candidates, with 47 percent supporting Biden and 45 percent supporting Trump. (Both the Florida and Pennsylvania polls had roughly 4-point margins of error.)

The latest poll of Arizona voters from The New York Times and Siena College Research Institute, conducted October 1–3, found Biden and Trump are extremely close among older voters there, too: 48 percent of those ages 65 and older said they would vote for Biden and 47 percent said they would vote for Trump.

Jorgensen Garners Interest From Millennials and Generation Z

In Arizona, 3 percent of all likely voters surveyed said they support Jo Jorgensen. The Libertarian Party (L.P.) presidential candidate drew the most support in Arizona from young voters, with 8 percent support among the 18- to 29-year-old crowd polled and only 1 percent support from voters 65 and older.

Jorgensen was also the top candidate for 3 percent of survey respondents in the Pennsylvania poll, and top choice for 2 percent in Florida. As in Arizona, Jorgensen attracted support from millennial and Gen Z voters in both states.

While just 1 percent of the oldest cohort in Florida supported Jorgensen, 6 percent of the 30- to 44-year-olds and 4 percent of the 18- to 29-year-olds polled did. (Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins was supported by 2 percent of each younger group in the Sunshine State.) In Pennsylvania, 6 percent each of the youngest and second-youngest groups supported Jorgensen, with her support dwindling to 3 percent among 45- to 64-year-olds and zero percent among the oldest group.

So, older voters aren’t fleeing Trump for the L.P. this year; slack seems to be picked up solely by Biden and Democrats.

If older voters prefer Biden in November, it will be a big deal. Remember, voters 65 and above “have gone for Republican presidential candidates since 2004” and “favored Trump over Hillary Clinton by a 52 to 45 percent margin,” as Robert Griffin, research director of the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group, points out.

He also notes that older voters are more likely to describe Biden than Trump as moderate—which could help explain Biden’s good showing among older Americans. They’re not swinging leftward, it could just be that Trump is a chaos agent and Biden is as status quo as they come.


FREE MINDS

In other Supreme Court news: justices ruled yesterday (with no dissents) to allow South Carolina Republicans “to reinstate the state’s witness-signature requirement on absentee ballots pending appeal.” More here.


FREE MARKETS


QUICK HITS

  • John McAfee is being charged with tax evasion by the Department of Justice. McAfee has been accused of earning “millions in income from promoting cryptocurrencies, consulting work, speaking engagements, and selling the rights to his life story for a documentary” but not filing any federal tax returns between 2014 and 2018.
  • “President Donald Trump has been touting chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine since March as effective treatments for COVID-19,” writes Ron Bailey. But “last week, when the president was hospitalized for a COVID-19 infection, his physicians listed the medications with which he is being treated” and “hydroxychloroquine is notable by its absence.”
  • “Nearly a third of hospitalized COVID-19 patients experienced some type of altered mental function—ranging from confusion to delirium to unresponsiveness” in a large new study published Monday in the Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. For the study, researchers looked at the first 509 people hospitalized with COVID-19 in the Chicago area.
  • Almost, you guys:

  • Sigh: “The chairman of the Senate committee that oversees airlines and U.S. transportation policy had his mask off for extended periods on a Delta flight to Mississippi on Thursday night, according to another passenger, and the company said he had to be reminded twice by a flight attendant to follow the airline’s mask requirement.”

Myles Cosgrove, a Louisville, Kentucky, detective who participated in the fruitless and legally dubious drug raid that killed Breonna Taylor last March, told investigators the incident unfolded so quickly that he was not consciously aware of using his gun. That detail, which emerged from audio recordings of grand jury proceedings that were released on Friday, is alarming in light of the fact that Cosgrove fired 16 rounds—including the fatal bullet, according to the FBI’s ballistic analysis.

  • In California, a day of activism around prisoners’ rights:

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3lvv3Cb
via IFTTT

Rabobank: It’s Easy To Call For Continued Lockdowns When One Has A Safe Job Working Comfortably From Home

Rabobank: It’s Easy To Call For Continued Lockdowns When One Has A Safe Job Working Comfortably From Home

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 09:20

By Michael Every of Rabobank

Back to the Roach Motel.

President Trump indeed returned to the White House yesterday, where people seem to be going down with Covid like flies. Luckily he is probably already immune, as he noted. Trump arrived by helicopter in a Leni Riefenstahl video clip and urged Americans –for the second time, the first by Tweet– not to be afraid of Covid, and not to let it dominate their lives. He had, he said, fought the virus as a leader. He had to do what he done, knowing the risks, involved.

Critics will point out that the man who just fought the virus is not yet out of the woods medically, and was caught puffing after climbing the stairs: true, but have they ever seen what Trump looks like after climbing any set of stairs at any time? The same critics point out Trump just benefitted from experimental, world class healthcare at public expense even as he has nominated a justice to the Supreme Court who may vote to repeal existing conditions protections offered by Obamacare.

However, one has to also consider that 2020 is likely a base election, and Leni Riefenstahl and Trump know how to fire up a base. It is very easy to call for continued lockdowns when one has a safe job paying full salary to work comfortably from home – which includes most Trump critics (and, full disclosure, this writer too). It’s far less attractive an option for a small business owner facing ruin, or for the self-employed, facing ruin, and even for the ‘always one rule for them and another for us’ blue collar voters who have had to keep working through Covid regardless, for example, delivering food to those working from home. Those are all Trump voters.

In short, objective analysis in partisan times would suggest there is going to be a flood of justified criticism of Trump’s actions (again), but likely also a lot of base support. Unless Trump has a health lapse, as his critics warn – but that is where we have been since Friday anyway.

Stocks certainly perked up on the Trump news, and 10-year Treasury yields rose too in a Lazarus effect….although earlier in the day we were told this was because Biden was far ahead in the polls. Or perhaps this was due to hopes for more US stimulus, which Trump has tweeted he very much wants done, and which appears to be edging closer?

On which, we must enter another Roach Motel. Yesterday, the Financial Times published an article from Stephen Roach –formerly of Morgan Stanley, and now a senior lecturer at Yale– in which he calls for the imminent collapse of the US dollar (which will decline by a third by the end of 2021, apparently) and its loss of global reserve currency status. Such pieces from Roach, always with the same theme, seem to appear once or twice a year now, and always get coverage in the financial press, regardless of the fact that they are nonsense. Two colleagues contacted me last night about the piece, which shows how much consternation it caused: one to double check that Roach’s arguments were indeed as silly as they looked and he wasn’t going mad.

Anyway, Roach is roaching that the USD will collapse because the US is running a vast fiscal deficit, and that will cause a vast current account deficit, and then foreigners won’t want to fund it, and then the USD will plunge, and then something else will emerge to replace it globally. This is what they teach at Yale today, apparently.

Naturally, this overlooks that the vast fiscal deficit –which looming stimulus would indeed make vaster– represents a transfer from the public sector to the private sector, so the huge deficit on one hand is matched by a huge surplus on the other. Think of those cheques for USD1,200 going to households, and all the households who just bank it while working from home. In other words, if the US runs a 20% fiscal deficit, for example, it won’t run a 20% current account deficit too: private savings will spike at the same time, and it will only run perhaps a 4% deficit overall.

So, yes, the USD can go down. But it’s already gone down a long way vs. EUR and JPY of late. Does anyone think the ECB and BOJ —who have the same fiscal deficit problems as the US!!!— are going to sit there and do nothing if EUR should try to go up to 1.40 and JPY to 80, bringing both crushing deflation? Likewise, Roach ignores that the USD is up a lot against many EM FX despite what has happened so far fiscally and politically. Is he really saying everyone will now want to hold EM and not US assets? This is also what they apparently teach at Yale.

That is a parallel to the equally tragicomic ‘But nobody will buy US Treasuries!’ argument, which plays out ad nauseum even as yields trend ever lower: on which, this latest UST yield spike is another false dawn unless Trump or Biden push for serious *structural* change in the economy – and that will take a lot more than a Build Back Better sign falling off of a lectern, Theresa May style, or a Leni Riefenstahl video of a helicopter and a balcony.

Roach also can’t make an argument for how any other currency or asset can realistically replace the USD, which is literally armed to the teeth to stop that happening, and where liabilities in the Eurodollar market exceed available USD by 9 to 1. It will just happen, he says. Such ideas are of course much appreciated in China: here is Roach being praised for his bold commentary in the official China Daily, for example.

Indeed, recall that on 8 October the arms embargo on Iran ends. Russia has suggested it will then sell Tehran its S-400 defence system. The US has said anyone doing so will feel the full effect of the USD ‘weapon’. Likewise, 12 October is the 90-day mark following the passage of the Hong Kong Autonomy Act, by which date China hawk Mike Pompeo must compile a list of each foreign person who is “materially contributing to, has materially contributed to, or attempts to materially contribute to the failure of the Government of China to meet its obligations under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law”. That then starts a short countdown to financial institutions being listed; which starts the countdown to the imposition of US sanctions. The USD weapon again.

Against this backdrop, people will be avoiding USD and looking at EUR or CNY or others? Only in the way people are always deliberately looking for Roach Motels, rather than ending up in one. For one example, the Aussie trade balance today was just AUD2,643m vs. an expectation of AUD5,050m: exports were down 4% m/m and imports up 2%. The RBA left rates on hold while making clear getting unemployment down is an “important national priority”, and that it is ready to ease again: it is waiting to see the budget, out later today (and a fiscal deficit expected to be around 12% of GDP) before acting, however. Yet expect rates at 0.1% and more QE as soon as November: which according to Mr Roach means AUD is going up to 0.90 by end-2021.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3d5zhxd Tyler Durden

Escape to distant, exotic lands… like Canada?

Last Tuesday night, around 10:30pm the Google search term, “How to apply for Canadian citizenship,” spiked.

Other popular searches that night included “how to move to Canada” or simply, “move to Canada.”

This was in response to two men in their 70s childishly bickering at each other for an hour and a half, televised live across the world.

For people in the United States, Canada always seems to be the first place that comes to mind whenever they think about leaving.

It seems every time there’s a controversial election, for example, a bunch of celebrities always threatens to move to Canada. (In 2016, the list included Snoop Dogg, Barbara Streisand, actor Bryan Cranston, and comedian Chelsea Handler… though none of them actually moved.)

It’s an obvious first choice given the similarities between the two countries.

But if you’re serious about making a move– or at least identifying a place you -might- consider moving to– before the chaos escalate, taxes go through the roof, or the public schools convince your child to identify as a seedless watermelon. . . then take a look at the menu.

The world is a big place, and there are dozens of countries around the world to choose that offer the widest variety of climate, culture, lifestyle, nature, business/investment opportunities you could imagine.

If you do like the cooler climate, with four distinct seasons, maybe look into Estonia or Georgia– both offer certain remote workers residency for a year. You could try it out, and see if you are serious about leaving your home country behind.

If you want to be in a similar time zone as North America, you could go south to Panama or Barbados, both of which have straightforward residency processes or temporary work permit options.

If Europe is more intriguing, Spain, Portugal, and Germany all have temporary visa options that allow you to live and work there as long as you have sufficient income or savings.

And if you REALLY want to just hop across the border, don’t forget about Mexico.

Hollywood has done tremendous work to brutalize Mexico’s reputation as a haven for violence. But that’s only true in certain parts of the country.

It would be as if foreigners judge the US based on antifa violence in Seattle and Portland, or the murder rate in downtown Baltimore. Most of the country is pretty quiet by comparison.

For instance, in areas like Mexico’s Yucatan state, crime is actually on par with the State of Wyoming.

Some of the countries I mentioned, including Mexico, Panama, and Portugal, allow permanent residency which can lead to full citizenship and a second passport.

If you happen to NOT be a US citizen, moving abroad generally means that you can completely divorce yourself from your home country’s tax system.

And if you’re a US citizen, moving to another country means that you can take advantage of the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion.

For tax year 2020, the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion means expats can earn up to $107,600 in wages without paying a dime of US federal income tax.

If you’re married, your spouse can qualify too. Plus there are generous housing allowances as well. So you can earn roughly $250,000 or more per couple and put almost all of it in your pocket.

Depending on which state you currently live in, you’d have to earn a pre-tax salary of roughly $400,000 in order to put the equivalent $250,000 in your pocket each year.

Not to mention, there are plenty of countries overseas where the cost of living is MUCH cheaper, where the schools, medical care, housing costs, etc. are incredibly low.

So there can clearly be a lot of financial benefit to living outside of your home country.

It’s a big world out there. There are so many options.

I’m not suggesting that you pick up and move. I am, however, suggesting that you at least think about it.

Consider what’s important to you: what are the most important characteristics of a potential new home?

Tax benefits? Nature? Safety and security? Medical care?

Whatever your priorities are, there are probably several options that tick the boxes.

And, as part of a good Plan B, it makes sense to at least have some of those options identified, regardless of whether or not you choose pull the trigger.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/30AZ3Va
via IFTTT

3410 Emerges As Key Gamma Level Level For S&P

3410 Emerges As Key Gamma Level Level For S&P

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 09:05

During yesterday’s market ramp, Eminis hit a brick wall at exactly 3,400 which according to SpotGamma yesterday is exactly where the “gamma wall” in the S&P was to be found.

However, now that the trading range has reset higher and the S&P is set to open around 3,400 what are the key “gamma” levels for the market?  For the answer we go to the latest note out of our friends at SpotGamma who note this morning that not surprisingly, the largest interest area shifts from 3350 up to 3400.

As the derivative experts explain, if the market can sustain the rally up into 3500, “gamma notional levels increase which should add some stability to S&P prices” however, the tricky part for bulls here is that the modeled “Call Wall” did not roll up much overnight. That said, they see 3410 as the largest positive gamma strike “which indicates resistance and/or a tendency for markets to mean revert should this level be broken.”

For todays action, they list 3400 as the key pivot and a large price magnet, while 3350 remains support and a break of that area suggests a sharp expansion in volatility. To the upside, the primary resistance is at 3410, but note a large Combo bar at 3428.

Finally, on the single stock side, SG writes that while they have seen a small uptick in call positions they “aren’t detecting anything abnormal” which probably means that SoftBank is taking a break from last week’s gamma squeeze.

 

 

 

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3jCqmpg Tyler Durden

UK Court Decision On Venezuela Gold Deals Blow To Regime Change Efforts

UK Court Decision On Venezuela Gold Deals Blow To Regime Change Efforts

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 08:51

Authored by Alan Macleod via MintPressNews.com,

A UK court ruled that the administration of Boris Johnson’s position that Juan Guaidó is the legitimate ruler of Venezuela is far from equivocal, paving the way for over $1 billion of the country’s gold to be released.  

A United Kingdom court has handed the Venezuelan government of Nicolas Maduro a major win today, overturning a previous ruling from a lower court that legitimized the British government’s decision to freeze Venezuelan government gold reserves held in the Bank of England. The English Court of Appeal ruled that the Conservative administration of Boris Johnson’s position that Juan Guaidó is the country’s legitimate ruler was far from equivocal, potentially paving the way for some $1.95 billion of the Central Bank of Venezuela’s gold to be accessed.

Following President Trump’s lead, in July, the U.K. government took the extraordinary step of derecognizing President Maduro in favor of the self-declared Guaidó, despite the fact that for nearly six months, he had not even been a member of his Popular Will party, let alone its leader. The move was labeled “highway robbery” by supporters of the Venezuelan government.

A nearly unheard of politician before his ascension to the role of head of the Venezuelan National Assembly (a post given out on a yearly rotational basis among all parties in the institution) in January 2019, Guaidó shocked the country by using his appointment to unilaterally declare himself president of the country. He then led a series of coup attempts throughout 2019 and 2020, the last of which involved paying Trump-linked American mercenaries to shoot their way into the presidential palace. However, the plan ended in complete disaster, with the Americans subsequently sentenced to 20 years of prison time.

Guaidó based his claim to power on Article 233 of the Venezuelan Constitution, which allows a president to be removed if he “abandons his position” or becomes “permanently unavailable to serve” for whatever reason. Maduro, however, had clearly not left his post. Regardless, if he had, Article 233 states that the vice-president would take charge until a new election by universal suffrage was held. Guaidó’s party was not even registered to stand in elections, having boycotted them the year previously under U.S. orders. The Trump administration had attempted to organize a total boycott from opposition parties, thereby undermining the process’ legitimacy, even threatening to sanction opposition presidential candidate Henri Falcón. Despite the partial boycott, turnout was relatively high. A larger percentage of the total electorate still cast their ballot for Maduro than Americans did for Trump in 2016 or Obama in 2012. The U.S. government is currently trying the same tactic in the upcoming December elections to the National Assembly, the State Department releasing a memo in September declaring that all opposition parties taking place were considered “puppet parties” participating in an “electoral charade,” and would therefore be sanctioned.

The United Kingdom and the United States have been leaders in a years-long economic and political campaign to oust Maduro from power, hitting the country with sanctions and attacking it politically. When Maduro attempted to use the impounded gold to buy humanitarian aid from the United Nations to deal with the coronavirus pandemic, the Johnson administration blocked it. Meanwhile, American sanctions, declared illegal by the U.N., have been responsible for over 100,000 Venezuelans’ death. The U.S. government is also continually provoking Venezuela militarily. Last week, it sent a warship — the U.S.S. William P. Lawrence — into the Caribbean, just 16 nautical miles from Venezuela’s coast. Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino described the action as “erratic and childish,” implying Trump was attempting to foment an “October Surprise” conflict to boost his reelection chances.

The U.S. has also funded and supported Guaidó throughout his coup attempts, grooming him since he was a student leader. Recently, they have been channeling money confiscated from the Venezuelan government to Guaidó so that he can personally pay every healthcare worker a huge stipend.

While the Maduro administration is very unpopular, the opposition has had little success shaking their image as elitists interested only in returning Venezuela to its former status as a U.S. client state. Guaidó is presented in Western media as a breath of fresh air and a break with that tradition. However, as the privately-educated son of an international airline pilot, and somebody who attended George Washington University (an impossible task for those who do not come from the elite), he has had little success persuading his countryfolk to get behind his vision for the country. A recent poll found that 3 percent of Venezuelans recognize him as president. Despite this, he has received virtually unanimous support in Washington and London. However, there is no doubt that today’s court ruling is a loss for him and a win for Maduro.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2StCw8f Tyler Durden

COVID-Lockdowns Trump Trade War – US Deficit Soars To 14 Year High

COVID-Lockdowns Trump Trade War – US Deficit Soars To 14 Year High

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 08:40

It appears COVID-Lockdowns have crushed the US trade war plan…

The US trade balance collapsed to its biggest deficit since 2006 in August at $67.1bn…

Source: Bloomberg

This was worse than the $66.2bn expectation as total imports increased 3.2% to $239 billion, while exports rose 2.2% from the prior month to $171.9 billion.

The further increase in imports suggests companies responded to stronger domestic demand amid lean inventories.

The nation’s surplus in services shrank to the lowest since 2012 as the goods deficit hit a record high

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly the China trade balance improved very marginally in August

Source: Bloomberg

Is it any wonder why the USDollar is under pressure?

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2GlFut5 Tyler Durden

How Dare He Recover?!!

How Dare He Recover?!!

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 08:15

Authored by James Howard Kunstler via Kunstler.com,

Hallelujahs echoed across the Blue Media late last week when the news broke that Donald Trump tested positive for coronavirus.

For four years the president had foiled every ambuscade set along his path by a morally-inflamed, predatory Resistance, and each time he beep-beeped his way around the trap. But, now, with a little help from a pitiless universe, they had him! A gazillion tiny, viral assassins were stealing through his bloodstream like so many microscopic jihadis, primping him for an agonizing death: his alveoli withering, red corpuscles robbed of their vital O2, pink foam issuing from his nostrils, toes and fingers turning blue-green — and most deliciously of all, he’d remain conscious of his imminent defeat, of the life (which he’d never deserved in the first place) draining by degrees from his wicked, orange, bloated, supine carcass…

Except… wait a minute… what the hell…? How could it be! Late Sunday he somehow arose from his bed-of-death, ordered pizza (with meat!) for a thousand imps and demons camped outside Walter Reed Hospital, and walked under his own power (!) into a limousine to take a ride around the block and wave at his unholy minions! The cheek of this man!

CNN had a whack attack. Brian Stelter was beside himself, hinting that sinister forces had punked the network, and all the other righteous Resistance cadres, and that Mr. Trump could be endangering every federal employee down to the enlisted men posted overseas by venturing from his sickroom. The New York Times went farther afield (of course), declaring that “the murky and shifting narrative of his illness was rewritten again with grim new details.” Nicely put by an outfit that has come to specialize in shifting narratives!

And indeed, the new Resistance narrative demands to know just exactly when did the president start to feel ill? Did he, perhaps on-purpose, haul his ailing, hulking, scheming Golem ass into the Cleveland debate venue with the hope of infecting his rival, delicate Ol’ White Joe Biden? Did he recklessly put at risk the White House staff, dignitaries and luminaries coming and going, their family members, associates, underlings, servants, children? Did he threaten the global order, world peace, the fate of humanity?

So now, a keening wail of lamentation rings out across the land at Mr. Trump’s possible, dastardly recovery. How dare he! — to paraphrase Saint Greta Thunberg. 209,000 other Americans died, and not him! What vile and unholy devices got him out of a sure death sentence? No doubt Democratic Party astrologasters and consulting augurers will be searching for clues among the orbiting planets and the spilled organs of sacrificed chickens in the days to come. Perhaps Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) can snare a few of the president’s attending physicians into his House Intel Committee and rev up another impeachment for going against doctors’ orders. Wouldn’t that be a delectable counter to the looming confirmation process for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s replacement next door in the Senate this month?

Over his dead body, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is hinting — a tantalizing prospect, with Covid-19 on the loose. It was Chuck who memorably told Rachel Maddow of MSNBC in 2017 that the Deep State “has six ways from [sic] Sunday at getting back at you.” By my count, they’re well over their allotted six by now. Not only did they all fail, but the seditionists behind them are liable to wind up behind bars before this is all over, perhaps even a few of Senator Schumer’s colleagues.

Anyway, Majority Leader McConnell isn’t buying Mr. Schumer’s sob story. “The Senate’s floor schedule will not interrupt the thorough, fair and historically supported confirmation process,” McConnell said on Saturday. The hearings are pegged to begin on October 12. Prediction: they will run three days, tops, and the nominee will sail through. No doubt Senator Schumer and company will be combing the legislative rules thickets with their Lawfare bush-beaters in search of some recondite, magic by-law that might prevent the deal from going down. Or else Chuck will threaten to shoot a puppy on the floor of the Senate if the Amy Coney Barrett hearing proceeds.

[President Trump’s discharge from, Walter Reed] was loaded to the brim with portentous metaphor, mainly, that Mr. Trump has overcome yet another adversity, specifically one that the Resistance has been using to scare the public into compliance with economy-wrecking rules. As the president re-enters something like normal life in the days ahead, perhaps the rest of America will rethink the abnormalities of 2020. Perhaps they will notice the Democratic Party’s investment in the Covid-19 lockdown narrative, and what it has done to their livelihoods, their families, and their futures. Maybe watching Mr. Trump get through this, they will see a way out of the woods.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/36InGTL Tyler Durden

Saudi Arabia Sees Oil At $50 Until 2023

Saudi Arabia Sees Oil At $50 Until 2023

Tyler Durden

Tue, 10/06/2020 – 07:45

Submitted by Irina Slav of OilPrice

Saudi Arabia appears to be more upbeat about the immediate future of oil prices than fundamentals warrant, according to Goldman Sachs analysts. These have calculated that the Saudi budget plan is based on a Brent average of $50 a barrel between 2020 and 2023, according to Bloomberg.

“Using our own estimates for the breakdown of government revenues, we calculate that the numbers presented in the budget statement are based on an average oil price of around $50 a barrel between 2020 and 2023,” one UK-based Goldman analyst told Bloomberg.

However, even at $50 a barrel, which is far from certain, Brent would be cheaper than Saudi Arabia needs it to be to shrink its deficit. Even the Saudis themselves have acknowledged the effect the pandemic has had on their finances. In a recent update, the governor of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority said the financial outlook for the year remained uncertain.

In July, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said that the price plunge and the oil production cuts would hit oil exporters in the Middle East and North Africa hard, with the combined oil income for those countries expected to plummet by US$270 billion this year compared to 2019.

Saudi Arabia is the biggest oil economy in the Gulf and while it will not be the hardest hit, it is already being affected adversely by the combination of oil’s fundamentals and the pandemic. The Kingdom booked a deficit of $29 billion for the second quarter and effected some austerity measures although Riyadh insists this is not austerity. A tripling of VAT, a cancellation of so-called cost-of-living allowances, and the delay of some public spending decisions and the cancellation of others were among the measures.

Even so, the largest OPEC oil producer appears to believe oil prices will start improving soon, if Goldman’s calculations are right. The bank is among the oil bulls that expect prices to recover beginning next year as the supply and demand situation rebalances. However, fresh tightenings of movement restrictions in Europe last week hinted this may not come to pass. Brent closed below $40 a barrel at the end of the week and with Libya ramping up oil production with lightning speed, it may be a while before the benchmark recovers.

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Stwkx1 Tyler Durden