Wholesale Inventories Build Most In 3 Years, Signal Q1 GDP Boost

Wholesale Inventories rose 4.5% YoY in January – the biggest annual build since June 2015 – as it appears the nation’s businesses are embracing the ‘field of dreams’ economy.

The 0.7% MoM rise in inventories is almost double expectations.

This better than expected inventory build will likely force an upside adjustment to Q1 GDP guesses (though Durable Goods disappointment may offset that).

And while we are reflecting on Q1 – is it not somewhat off-putting that inventories surged but orders tumbled in January?

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Co3Ezd Tyler Durden

Advance Data Signals Biggest US Trade Deficit In 10 Years

For the fifth month in a row, the US trade balance went deeper into deficit (if the advance data holds), hitting a larger than expected -$74.4bn in January – the biggest deficit since July 2008 (in the middle of the last recession).

Both imports and exports dropped in January:

  • Exports fell 2.2% in Jan. to $133.922b from $137.004b in the prior month

  • Imports fell 0.5% to $208.317b in Jan. from $209.263b in Dec.

But the overall picture is not pretty…

As a reminder, the trade deficit was actually at a record high ex-petroleum in December…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2FzC7tw Tyler Durden

Powell Testimony Highlights: Ignore Recent Volatility, Gradual Rate Hikes Will Continue

In advance of his first testimony before the House at 10am today, Fed Chair Jay Powell released his prepared remarks moments ago, as “some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds” and that the Fed can continue gradually raising interest rates as the outlook for growth remains strong, as and the recent bout of financial volatility shouldn’t weigh on the U.S. economy.

Commenting on Trump’s tax reform and policies, Powell said that “fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory.” He also glossed over the recent bout of volatility, “saying financial conditions remain accommodative.” At the same time, he noted that “inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.”

Of particular interest to markets will be Powell’s commentary on recent market events, which Powell is not too worried about: “After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong.

Looking forward, Powell said that “in gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis.”

Also notable is his conviction that “the economic outlook remains strong” because “the robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment.”

The Fed chair also said that “we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term,’’ and added that the lag in wages during the expansion was due to low gains in output per hour, or productivity, though a new wave of investment spending “should support higher productivity growth in time.’’

“Wages should increase at a faster pace as well,’’ Powell said, adding that the FOMC continued to view the shortfall in inflation last year “as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat.’’

Overall, a neutral commentary, one which clearly suggests that the recent market correction did not disturb the Fed, and one which hints that as long as “outlook remains strong”, rate hikes will continue…

His full testimony is below:

Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

Chairman Jerome H. Powell

Chairman Hensarling, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.

On the occasion of my first appearance before this Committee as Chairman of the Federal Reserve, I want to express my appreciation for my predecessor, Chair Janet Yellen, and her important contributions. During her term as Chair, the economy continued to strengthen and Federal Reserve policymakers began to normalize both the level of interest rates and the size of the balance sheet. Together, Chair Yellen and I have worked to ensure a smooth leadership transition and provide for continuity in monetary policy. I also want to express my appreciation for my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Finally, I want to affirm my continued support for the objectives assigned to us by the Congress–maximum employment and price stability–and for transparency about the Federal Reserve’s policies and programs. Transparency is the foundation for our accountability, and I am committed to clearly explaining what we are doing and why we are doing it. Today I will briefly discuss the current economic situation and outlook before turning to monetary policy.

Current Economic Situation and Outlook
The U.S. economy grew at a solid pace over the second half of 2017 and into this year. Monthly job gains averaged 179,000 from July through December, and payrolls rose an additional 200,000 in January. This pace of job growth was sufficient to push the unemployment rate down to 4.1 percent, about 3/4 percentage point lower than a year earlier and the lowest level since December 2000. In addition, the labor force participation rate remained roughly unchanged, on net, as it has for the past several years–that is a sign of job market strength, given that retiring baby boomers are putting downward pressure on the participation rate. Strong job gains in recent years have led to widespread reductions in unemployment across the income spectrum and for all major demographic groups. For example, the unemployment rate for adults without a high school education has fallen from about 15 percent in 2009 to 5-1/2 percent in January of this year, while the jobless rate for those with a college degree has moved down from 5 percent to 2 percent over the same period. In addition, unemployment rates for African Americans and Hispanics are now at or below rates seen before the recession, although they are still significantly above the rate for whites. Wages have continued to grow moderately, with a modest acceleration in some measures, although the extent of the pickup likely has been damped in part by the weak pace of productivity growth in recent years.

Turning from the labor market to production, inflation-adjusted gross domestic product rose at an annual rate of about 3 percent in the second half of 2017, 1 percentage point faster than its pace in the first half of the year. Economic growth in the second half was led by solid gains in consumer spending, supported by rising household incomes and wealth, and upbeat sentiment. In addition, growth in business investment stepped up sharply last year, which should support higher productivity growth in time. The housing market has continued to improve slowly. Economic activity abroad also has been solid in recent quarters, and the associated strengthening in the demand for U.S. exports has provided considerable support to our manufacturing industry.

Against this backdrop of solid growth and a strong labor market, inflation has been low and stable. In fact, inflation has continued to run below the 2 percent rate that the FOMC judges to be most consistent over the longer run with our congressional mandate. Overall consumer prices, as measured by the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE), increased 1.7 percent in the 12 months ending in December, about the same as in 2016. The core PCE price index, which excludes the prices of energy and food items and is a better indicator of future inflation, rose 1.5 percent over the same period, somewhat less than in the previous year. We continue to view some of the shortfall in inflation last year as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat; consistent with this view, the monthly readings were a little higher toward the end of the year than in earlier months.

After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong. The robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment. Moreover, fiscal policy is becoming more stimulative. In this environment, we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term. Wages should increase at a faster pace as well. The Committee views the near-term risks to the economic outlook as roughly balanced but will continue to monitor inflation developments closely.

Monetary Policy
I will now turn to monetary policy. The Congress has assigned us the goals of promoting maximum employment and stable prices. Over the second half of 2017, the FOMC continued to gradually reduce monetary policy accommodation. Specifically, we raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point at our December meeting, bringing the target to a range of 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 percent. In addition, in October we initiated a balance sheet normalization program to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings. That program has been proceeding smoothly. These interest rate and balance sheet actions reflect the Committee’s view that gradually reducing monetary policy accommodation will sustain a strong labor market while fostering a return of inflation to 2 percent.

In gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis. While many factors shape the economic outlook, some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds: In particular, fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory. Despite the recent volatility, financial conditions remain accommodative. At the same time, inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

In evaluating the stance of monetary policy, the FOMC routinely consults monetary policy rules that connect prescriptions for the policy rate with variables associated with our mandated objectives. Personally, I find these rule prescriptions helpful. Careful judgments are required about the measurement of the variables used, as well as about the implications of the many issues these rules do not take into account. I would like to note that this Monetary Policy Report provides further discussion of monetary policy rules and their role in the Federal Reserve’s policy process, extending the analysis we introduced in July.

Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EZzNuX Tyler Durden

Durable Goods Orders Tumble In January

Durable goods orders slumped unexpectedly in January – dropping 3.7% MoM (vs a 2.0% expected decline), and worse still, December’s bounce was revised lower as the ‘uneven-ness’ of the so-called recovery rears its ugly head once again.

The uglier picture here is that January’s plunge is not a reflection of a one-off December surge (in aircraft or defense orders) as we have seen previously.

Core durable goods orders dropped for the first time in 7 months…

Non-Defense new orders also declined MoM.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Cnx1BW Tyler Durden

Bob Poole on Trump’s Gas Tax, Rep. Beto O’Rourke on Challenging Ted Cruz

I'm still taking the under, but he could be a top-5 political story of 2018. ||| John Glaser/Cal Sport Media/NewscomWho loves gas-tax increases? According to preliminary reports, fans of jacking up the federal government’s share of consumer gasoline spending include but are not limited to President Donald Trump, House Transportation Committee Chairman Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Penn.), and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, among other parties not normally associated with the T-word. It’s all part of Trump’s politically wobbly infrastructure plan, whose main sticking point (though there are many) is over just how many hundreds of billions of dollars will be spent by Washington. Hence the thirst for revenue.

I will be asking about the propriety of the idea, and the long history of the gas tax, with arguably the most knowledgeable transportation policy expert in the country, the Reason Foundation’s own Robert Poole, tomorrow when I again guest-host Stand UP! with Pete Dominick on SiriusXM Insight (channel 121) from 9-12 a.m. ET. Poole has written about the subject a time or three over the years, including the recent piece, “It Is Time to Rethink the U.S. Highway Model: Our highway funding system based on per-gallon fuel taxes is breaking down for several reasons.”

Competing for Poole’s thunder will be Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), who, in addition to being that rare Democrat who successfully primaried an incumbent in part over the issue of legalizing marijuana, is now the Great Democrat Hope for unseating Sen. Ted Cruz and helping turn Texas from red to blue. (See O’Rourke’s 2013 interview with Mike Riggs, and his 2015 interview with me.) We will definitely hit up the latest in congressional immigration negotiations.

Other guests are scheduled to include Matt Kibbe, to talk about his recent Reason piece “The Tea Party Is Officially Dead. It Was Killed by Partisan Politics.,” and Gordon Chang, to talk about Xi Jinping’s power grab.

Please call in at any time, at 1-877-974-7487.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2t2nFHU
via IFTTT

Trump Tweets: Russia Probe Is A “Witch Hunt” With “No Evidence Of Collusion”

After taking a notable break from Twitter early this week, President Donald Trump sent out a flurry of tweets this morning on one of his favorite topics: Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

The tweets come after Mueller secured a guilty plea from former Paul Manafort deputy Rick Gates, who is now believed to be cooperating with the investigation. Mueller also recently secured a guilty plea from Dutch lawyer Alex van der Zwaan for lying to investigators about his interactions with Gates.

In a series of tweets, Trump offers several quotes from an appearance by Fox judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News last night where he the judge opined that “written answers” would be a victory for the president, referring to a report last week that Trump’s lawyers are pushing for Mueller to accept limited testimony from Trump, including the possibility of offering written answers to the Mueller team’s questions.

Napolitano soon turned the conversation to Hillary Clinton’s criminality and any evidence that might remain at the DOJ, saying “somebody in the Justice Department has a treasure trove of evidence of Mrs. Clinton’s criminality…” which Trump quoted…

 

 

…Along with several other comments from pundits expressing skepticism about the investigation…

 

 

 

…Before ending his tweetstorm with a familiar declaration…

 

 

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2HRzOmu Tyler Durden

Dollar Spikes After Weidmann’s ECB Rate-Hike Comments

The euro is weakening and Dollar Index spiking (back above pre-FOMC Minutes level) following headlines from Buba President Jens Weidmann on ECB rate-hike guidance.

When asked about prospects for ECB interest rates, Bloomberg reports that Weidmann pointed to investor expectations built on the economic situation and communication by the central bank. Given the current economic backdrop, expectations for hikes to begin in mid-2019 are “not completely unrealistic,” he said.

Weidmann’s comments come as the ECB debates how to wind down QE after September and amend language that currently includes a pledge to keep interest rates unchanged “well past” that time. With the 19-nation economy expanding strongly and confidence increasing that inflation will sustainably pick up, officials have signaled that a shift could come early this year.

“This could probably be one part of our discussion — whether to complement any decision on the asset-purchase program and on communication regarding the asset-purchase program with a bit more specificity with respect to the interest-rate guidance,” Weidmann said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Frankfurt. “‘Well past’ is a rather vague time dimension so it could be about specifying what well past means.”

The reaction was EUR selling, USD buying…

We suspect the move is as much technical stop-hunting as fundamental shift as FX algos worldwide sharpen their headline-reading minds on Powell’s hearing.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2GO3cZo Tyler Durden

Blain: “Here’s Why Many Think The Market Looks Unsustainable”

Blain’s Morning Porridge, submitted by Bill Blain of Mint Partners

February nearly behind us – where does that leave the rest of the year?

“And if the band you’re in starts playing different tunes….”

It’s a pleasure to be writing the Porridge this morning after London was hit by the vicious “Beast from the East” Whiteout last night, with nearly 2 whole snowflakes causing mass train cancellations and panic consumer buying. Thankfully the authorities had prepared us all with their “yellow snow alert”, (what’s the first thing a baby polar bear learns?), and so we were all prepared and wrapped up warm. London survived Snowmaggedon! The next Blizzard hits Thursday – we shall be wearing shorts and sunglasses. (US readers – extreme sarcasm alert..)

February looks like its closing on constructive tone. So much for the VAR/VIX Volatility Crash. It almost feels like it didn’t happen. Don’t be fooled. Markets are in “wait and see” mode rather than convinced on direction. Volumes (particularly in stocks) are suspiciously low.

This week’s key issues are the Italian Elections – where we’re effectively blind because of 2 week no-polling regulations, German coalition concerns – where we simply can’t guess how the SPD membership will vote, and what the new Fed-Hed is going to say. Its just more of the same – apparently. Most folk are breathing a sigh of relief that February’s early slides didn’t turn into market rout and ruin.

With US stocks total market capitalisation now trading right up to 143% of US GDP – the Buffet Chart (attached), a number of folk have warned the market looks unsustainable. However, the structure of the market has also changed. The stock market is more balanced across sectors (in 2000, 40% of value was in Tech, today its 27%). My macro-economist colleague Martin Malone believes the breadth of the US market means we can stop worrying and upgrade the Equity/GDP target from the 20-yr average of 100% to 150%.

The truth is we’re into a new 2 part reality. Things have changed.

There is the short-term action; what happens next on the charts. Then there is the market going through a longer-term paradigm shift as we adapt to the new reality. We have to be challenging the way we think about markets – get out of the mindset of the last few years, and into a more market driven way of thinking to reflect how things have changed. We’ve shifted gears in both bonds and stocks. Apparently over 60% of fund management professionals have less than 8 years market experience – which means they haven’t seen bond bear markets, liquidity ice-storms, or genuine fear in stocks. We can warn about them – much like the authorities did about last night’s non-blizzard.

The new fundamentals are different – stop worrying about deflation and figure out the reality that inflation might be unmeasured (especially in Europe)!. The outlook is changed – the global financial crash has given way to global synchronous growth. Central banks remain an issue – figure out how wrong they might be, and the risk they panic. And, politics will remain “fluid” and volatile – driven by increased perceptions of income inequality as a fertile breeding ground for populism. It’s a new world.. try to read it.

But taken as a whole, what’s not to like? Global Growth!

Lets start with central banks where the focus today will be on Jerome Powell’s first public comments as Fed Chairman: Will he hint a hawkish 4 hike pace, or a dovish 3 hike ramble? It’s the words that go with it that will count – what will he say about momentum, growth, etc. On the other hand, the first reference I can find to the Powell Put (thanks Ara Levonian for alerting me to the fact the market is already discussing it) came as early as Feb 5th in Marketwatch – when some Fed watcher opined the sell-off in stocks is not a concern; “don’t even think about a Powell put.” The key thing is to take a look at the 10-year Treasury chart – then try to convince yourself we’re not in bear phase.

What about politics? It feels like there is massive risk in Italy, in Germany and the UK, but these things are seldom as bad as they promise. While Brexit remains an unholy mess… just imagine how shocked you would be, and how quickly your market assessment would have to change if Theresa May was suddenly able to govern close to competently? (Sure that would require a whole fleet of No 37 buses to impact cabinet ministers with prejudice.. but, you never know..) The bottom line is politics is going to change our base line assumptions.

Which leaves growth – the real driver of value. Although large swathes of the investment community believe growth may stall later this year or early in 2019, all the global institutions are positive. Global GDP is rising, justifying higher stocks and risk assets. With that pace of growth still modest, and inflation threats limited, there might not even be so much to fear in bonds.

Hmmm.. it all sounds very positive… Yep… I’m a buyer. Buy Risk. Sell Bonds.

 

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2GOfIYM Tyler Durden

Self-Proclaimed Bitcoin Inventor, Craig Wright Sued For $5 Billion

Submitted by CoinTelegraph

Chief scientist of nChain and self-proclaimed mind behind the Satoshi Nakamoto pseudonym, Craig Wright, is being sued for $5 bln. The suit is brought to the United States District Court of the Southern District of Florida by the estate of David Kleiman.

David Kleiman was a computer scientist and cyber-security expert, whom many suspect to have been one of the developers behind Bitcoin and the Blockchain technology.

In documents which surfaced on Reddit, the plaintiff claims that Wright stole hundreds of thousands of BTC, worth over $5 bln dollars at today’s rate, from David Kleiman’s estate. The statement by the plaintiff alleges that Wright recognized that Kleiman’s friends and family were initially unaware of the wealth he accumulated.

The official complaint states that Wright took advantage of this and “forged a series of contracts that purported to transfer Dave’s assets to Craig and/or companies controlled by him. Craig backdated these contracts and forged Dave’s signature on them.”

The plaintiff continues in the document, stating that following David Kleiman’s death on April 26, 2013, Wright contacted Kleiman’s estate and disclosed that he and David had worked together to develop Blockchain and Bitcoin.

According to the estate, Wright claimed that David had signed away any rights to resulting wealth or intellectual property in exchange for a non-controlling and non-operational share in an Australian company. According to the plaintiff, Wright estimated the share to be worth “millions”., and informed the Kleiman estate that he’d be able to sell the share on the estate’s behalf within a few months.

Apparently this was a lie, as the company went bankrupt after Wright misled the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). In late 2015, Australian police raided Wright’s home, and Wright fled to the UK from Australia.

To date, the plaintiff states that Wright hasn’t returned any of the bitcoins or the intellectual property rights to the Kleiman estate. The lawsuit is “brought to rectify that injustice.”

Kleiman is seeking compensation for the intellectual property in addition to the 5 bln BTC fortune.

While Wright no longer claims he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and the lawsuit does not seek to discover or define the identity of that individual, the proceedings may require that identity to be established in order to find a definite ruling.

Wright has issued a one-word statement regarding the lawsuit via Twitter:

The case is Ira Kleiman v. Craig Wright, No. 18-cv-80176, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, according to Bloomberg.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Creepa Tyler Durden

Trump Backs Away From Raising Minimum Age For Gun Purchases

After President Donald Trump last week surprised his supporters and NRA members, by saying he would support increasing the age limit for buying long guns to 21, along with a raft of other measures including supporting a bill that would strengthen background checks, Trump appears to be backing away from his call to raise the age limit, according to CNN.

“He’s obviously moving back from that,” a key GOP congressional source said.

After promising that the NRA would go along with his plan, but the influential lobby came out against the idea. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, also expressed skepticism for the idea and said it might not have enough support to pass the Senate.

Trump

Another source close to the White House said Trump signaled as much in both his remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Friday and at the White House on Monday. The source asked how a soldier could be told he or she could use an assault weapon on the battlefield but not at home to protect his or her family. Last week, Sen. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican, said he was supportive of a bill with Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California to “raise the minimum purchase age for non-military buyers from 18 to 21.”

Another source close to the White House said Trump signaled as much in both his remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Friday and at the White House on Monday. The problem, as NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch famously articulated during a CNN town hall last week, is how do you tell an 18-year-old soldier that he or she can use an assault weapon on the battlefield but not at home.

Last week, Sen. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican, said he was supportive of a bill with Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California to “raise the minimum purchase age for non-military buyers from 18 to 21.”

To be sure, it isn’t clear how committed Trump is to the issue. The President tweeted his support for the idea last week, and a few Republican senators, including Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, also voiced support for raising the age to 21.

Trump is set to meet with lawmakers on Wednesday to discuss the legislative response to the Parkland shooting. Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders wouldn’t say exactly what would be discussed. Sanders said Trump has also instructed the ATF to find a way to outlaw bump stocks.

Meanwhile, Florida lawmakers late Monday rejected a proposed assault weapons ban. They did, however, approve raising the legal age for purchasing a firearm to 21 – while also approving legislation to allow teachers to carry guns in school, the Post reported.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2BRRcXE Tyler Durden